Scribd
Upload
1K views1 page

Video Presentation Rubric (Contemporary Art)

The rubric evaluates video presentations on content and organization, usefulness, creativity and design elements, mechanics, and participation. It provides criteria for beginning, developing, proficient, and exemplary levels across each category, with point values assigned from 5 to 20. The highest level demonstrates a complete, easily followed story that promotes technology use and engages the audience, while lower levels show poor organization, lack of focus, design flaws, and less student contribution.

Uploaded by

Raymund Patricio
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
1K views1 page

Video Presentation Rubric (Contemporary Art)

The rubric evaluates video presentations on content and organization, usefulness, creativity and design elements, mechanics, and participation. It provides criteria for beginning, developing, proficient, and exemplary levels across each category, with point values assigned from 5 to 20. The highest level demonstrates a complete, easily followed story that promotes technology use and engages the audience, while lower levels show poor organization, lack of focus, design flaws, and less student contribution.

Uploaded by

Raymund Patricio
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

Video Presentation Rubric (Contemporary Art)

Beginning Developing Proficient Exemplary


5 10 15 20

Content & Not organized. Portions may be Fairly well Program shows a
Organization – poorly documented documented and continuous progression of
Difficult to follow. and/or organized. organized. Format ideas and tells a complete,
Is your project Poor quality shows Hard to follow the is easy to follow. easily followed story.
organized and poor effort. progressions of the Good explanation Well documented and
documented? story. Explanation shows good effort. organized. Excellent, well
shows some effort. thought out explanation
shows superior effort.

Usefulness – Project’s usefulness Project Project is focused Project is focused and


is in question. Does demonstrated and informative; very informative;
Does your video not inform; does not development of promotes the use of promotes the use of
stay focused on an stay focused on the computer computer computer technology to
informative topic? topic. technology; has technology to create create the video and
Does it promote the problems staying the video to deliver makes others want to use
use of technology to focused on topic. information. the same type of format in
inform the audience delivering information to
about the topic? an audience.

Creativity & Use of elements Minimal use of Good use of Excellent sense of design.
Elements of Design detracts from video. design elements. graphics and/or Effective camera
– Is your video Too many or too No transitions. other design techniques used for the
interesting? Did gaudy graphics; Sound is lacking or elements. Some video and pictures. Video
your choice of transitions, too inappropriate or transitions are and pictures are I focus
elements such as many clips, scratchy. Some inappropriately and of good quality.
film clips, pictures, backgrounds and/or pictures or video placed. Sound Smooth transitions are
backgrounds, and sounds detract from clips may be out of quality is OK. Video appropriate and aid in
transitions enhance content. Pictures or focus or “shaky”. clips or pictures are delivery of the
the project? video clips may be clear and in focus. presentation.
out of focus or
“shaky”.

Mechanics – Did Includes five or Includes 3 – 4 Includes 2 – 3 Grammar, spelling,


you check your more grammatical grammatical errors, grammatical errors, punctuation, capitalization
grammar and errors, misspellings, misspellings, misspellings, are correct.
usage? punctuation errors. punctuation errors. punctuation errors.

Participation – Did Students make poor Students select Students make good Students make good
all the students on choices for their choices for their working working relationships. All
the group group activity. The group activity relationships for students in the group
participated and group is unable to according to social their activity. All participate actively 100%
contributed a fair complete the video desire. Some students in the of the time. Each student
share? in a timely fashion. students in the group participate excels in every activity.
group participate actively 100% of the
actively. Few time. Most students
students excel in the excel in the
activities. activities.

*Who is/are the best actor/s and actress/es for you? Kindly write the/their name/s below*

Judge

You might also like