** T- Substantial Definitions

T – “Substantial Reduction” = 25%

US code defines a “substantial reduction” as 25% of spending in the context of

military policy.
US Code 10 (TITLE 10. ARMED FORCES SUBTITLE A. GENERAL MILITARY LAW
PART IV. SERVICE, SUPPLY, AND PROCUREMENT CHAPTER 148. NATIONAL
DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY AND INDUSTRIAL BASE, DEFENSE REINVESTMENT,
AND DEFENSE CONVERSION SUBCHAPTER II. POLICIES AND PLANNING, May 17,
lexis)

"(f) Definitions. For purposes of this section: "(1) The term "major defense program"
means a program that is carried out to produce or acquire a major system (as defined in
section 2302(5) of title 10, United States Code). "(2) The terms 'substantial reduction'
and 'substantially reduced', with respect to a defense contract under a major defense
program, mean a reduction of 25 percent or more in the total dollar value of the funds
obligated by the contract.".

The DOD defines a “substantial reduction” as 25% of funding.

DOD 5/12/2003, Department of Defense, Department of Defense Instruction SUBJECT:
Operation of the Defense Acquisition System, N UMBER 5000.2 cp

E9.4.3.                                    Additional Funding Considerations.  The DoD Components shall not

terminate or substantially reduce participation in international cooperative ACAT ID
programs under signed international agreements without USD(AT&L) approval; or in
international cooperative ACAT IAM programs without ASD(C3I) approval.  A DoD
Component may not terminate or substantially reduce U.S. participation in an
international cooperative program until after providing notification to the USD(AT&L)
or the ASD(C3I).  As a result of that notification, the USD(AT&L) or the ASD(C3I) may
require the DoD Component to continue to provide some or all of the funding for that
program in order to minimize the impact on the international cooperative program. 
Substantial reduction is defined as a funding or quantity decrease of 25 percent or more
in the total funding or quantities in the latest President's Budget for that portion of the
international cooperative program funded by the DoD Component seeking the
termination or reduced participation.

A substantial reduction means a reduction of 25% or more

DFARS 2006 [Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS) and
Procedures, Guidance, and Information (PGI) “NOTIFICATION OF ANTICIPATED
CONTRACT TERMINATION OR REDUCTION” DEC 2006,
http://www.acq.osd.mil/dpap/dars/dfars/html/current/252249.htm]

Definitions  “Major defense program” means a program that is carried out to produce or
acquire a major system (as defined in 10 U.S.C. 2302(5)) (see also DoD 5000.2-R,
Mandatory Procedures for Major Defense Acquisition Programs (MDAPs) and Major
Automated Information System (MAIS) Acquisition Programs. “Substantial reduction”
means a reduction of 25 percent or more in the total dollar value of funds obligated by
the contract.
Interpretation – a substantial reduction is 25% - military regulations prove.
Major Steven N. Tomanelli et al, has served as a Judge Advocate in the United States Air
Force, Chief of Acquisition and Fiscal Law for the Air Force s Air Mobility Command,
and Senior DoD Counsel for the National Reconnaissance Office (NRO), Army Lawyer,
February 1994, Lexis Academic

1. Regulatory Changes--Notification Requirements for Termination or Reduction of

Defense Programs.--The DOD has issued an interim rule requiring military departments and defense
agencies to notify contractors of a potential termination of, or substantial reduction in, a defense
program. n581 Under the new rule, each military department and defense agency must
establish procedures for determining which defense programs are likely to be terminated
or substantially reduced as a result of the submission of the President's budget or
enactment of an appropriations act. Within thirty days of such submission or enactment,
agencies and military departments must notify affected contractors of the proposed
termination or reduction. Affected contractors are those with a contract of $ 500,000 or more
under a program identified as likely to be terminated or reduced by at least twenty-five percent.
Within two weeks after receiving notice from the government, contractors must notify,
among others, their affected employees and subcontractors of the proposed termination
or reduction.

25% is the definition used in military legislation.

National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1994, PUBLIC LAW 103-160 [H.R. 2401],
NOVEMBER 30, 1993, Lexis Congressional

"(g) Definitions.--For purposes of this section:

"(1) The term 'major defense program' means a program that is carried out to produce
or acquire a major system (as defined in section 2302(5) of title 10, United States Code).
"(2) The terms 'substantial reduction' and 'substantially reduced', with respect to a major defense
program, mean a reduction of 25 percent or more in the total dollar value of contracts under the
program.".

For international cooperative programs, substantial reductions must be a

reduction of 25% or more or funding or quantity allocated in previous year’s
budget.
Defense Acquisition University, 2008, “Resource Allocation Process”,
https://learn.dau.mil/CourseWare/804197_5/course/.../print_version.pdf

Termination or Reduction in Participation in International Cooperative Programs “DoD

Components shall notify and obtain the approval of the USD(AT&L), for ACAT ID, or for
ACAT IAM programs, before terminating or substantially reducing participation in
international cooperative programs under signed international agreements. The
USD(AT&L) may require the DoD Component to continue to provide some or all of the
funding for that program in order to minimize the impact on the international
cooperative program. Substantial reduction is defined as a funding or quantity decrease
of 25 percent or more in the total funding or quantities in the latest President's Budget
for that portion of the international cooperative program funded by the DoD Component
seeking the termination or reduced participation.” (DoDI 5000.02)
 T – Substantial = 5% (Contextual)
A substantial military presence is 5 percent or greater.
Booth et al 2k - Ph.D. candidate in sociology at the University of Maryland. His current
research focuses on the social and economic effects that the military has on local labor
markets in the United States, April 2k
(Bradford, William W. Falk, David R. Segal, Mady Wechsler Segal, “The Impact of
Military Presence in Local Labor Markets on the Employment of Women”
Source: Gender and Society, Vol. 14, No. 2 (Apr., 2000), pp. 318-332)
This article uses Public Use Micro sample (PUMS) data drawn from the 1990 census to
explore the relationship between military presence, defined as the percentage of the local labor force
in the active-duty armed forces, and women's employment and earnings across local labor
market areas (LMAs) in the United States. Comparisons of local rates of unemployment
and mean women's earnings are made between those LMAs in which the military plays a
disproportionate role in the local labor market and those in which military presence is
low. Results suggest that women who live in labor market areas with a substantial (5 percent or
greater) military presence have, on average, lower annual earnings and higher rates of
unemployment than their counterparts who live in nonmilitary L MAs. The argument is
made that through the interaction of several socially situated conditions-including
gender, family, labor markets, human capital, and place-the military emerges as a source
of inequality in labor market out-comes for women working on or around military
installations.
 T – “Substantially Reduce” = 50%
DOD defines “substantially reduce” as 50%.
DOD 96 Department of Defense Regulation, Number 5000.2R, Change 3 cp
DoD Components may not terminate or substantially reduce participation in joint ACAT
ID programs without the approval of the USD(A&T). Before any such termination or
substantial reduction is approved, the proposed termination or substantial reduction
shall be reviewed by the JROC. The USD(A&T) may require a Component to continue to
provide some or all of the funding necessary to allow the joint program to continue in an
efficient manner after approval of a Component request to terminate or substantially
reduce that Component’s participation (10 USC §2311(c)41). Substantial reduction is
defined as a funding or quantity decrease of 50% or more in the total funding or
quantities in the latest President’s Budget for that portion of the joint program funded by
the Component seeking to reduce its participation.

DOD defines substantial reduction as 50% - official guidelines prove.

US Department of Defense (DOD), produced by the Office of Under Secretary of Defense
(Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics), Office of Assistant Secretary of Defense
(Command, Control, Communications, and Intelligence), Office of Director, Operational
Test and Evaluation, “Mandatory Procedures for Major Defense Acquisition Programs
(MDAPS) and Major Automated Information Systems (MAIS) Acquisition Programs,”
April 5, 2002,
http://www.explorationsystems.nasa.gov/documents/TTT_052005/DoD50002R.pdf
DA 7/12/2010
C7.10.3.12. The DoD Components shall not terminate or substantially reduce
participation in joint ACAT ID programs without Requirements Authority review and
USD(AT&L) approval; or in joint ACAT IA programs without Requirements Authority
review and ASD(C3I) approval. The USD(AT&L) or ASD(C3I) may require a DoD
Component to continue some or all funding, as necessary, to sustain the joint program in
an efficient manner, despite approving their request to terminate or reduce participation.
Substantial reduction is defined as a funding or quantity decrease of 50
percent or more in the total funding or quantities in the latest President's Budget
for that portion of the joint program funded by the DoD Component seeking the
termination or reduced participation.

In the context of the military, a “substantial reduction” is defined as at least

50%.
Comprehensive Base Closure Reform and Recovery Act 92 1992 H.R. 4421 ; 102 H.R. 4421, text of
the Comprehensive Base Closure Reform and Recovery Act of 1992, introduced by
Olympia Snowe, lexis
TITLE I-ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION AT MILITARY INSTALLATIONS TO BE
CLOSED
SEC. 101. CLEANUP SCHEDULE FOR CERTAIN BASES ON SUPERFUND NATIONAL
PRIORITIES LIST.
  (a) CLEANUP SCHEDULE FOR CERTAIN BASES ON NATIONAL PRIORITIES LIST.-
(1)
With respect to each military installation described in subsection (b)-
      (A) before the installation is closed or substantial reductions in its operations have
occurred, at least 75 percent of the remedial action required on the installation pursuant
to the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of
1980 (42 U.S.C. 9601 et seq.) shall be completed; and
      (B) not later than two years after the installation is closed or substantial reductions in
its operations have occurred, all of the remedial action required on the installation
pursuant to such Act shall be completed.
  (2) For purposes of paragraph (1), substantial reductions in the operations of a military
installation shall be considered to have occurred if more than 50 percent of the
personnel assigned to the installation, including employees and members of the Armed
Forces, have been reassigned and moved to another installation.

More evidence.
THOMAS.gov 92 – Summary of H.R.4421, the Comprehensive Base Closure Reform and
Recovery Act of 1992, http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?
d102:HR04421:@@@L&summ2=m&
Comprehensive Base Closure Reform and Recovery Act of 1992 - Title I:
Environmental Restoration At Military Installations To Be Closed - Requires,
with respect to each military installation which is on the National Priorities List (for
substantial environmental cleanup) under the Comprehensive Environmental Response,
Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 and which is to be closed under Federal base
closure Acts or otherwise by the Department of Defense (DOD): (1) that at least 75
percent of the environmental remedial action required under Federal law be completed
before the installation is closed or substantial reductions in its operations have occurred;
and (2) that all of the required remedial action be occurred no later than two years after
such installation is closed or substantially reduced. Defines a "substantial reduction" as
the reassignment of more than 50 percent of its personnel.

Our definition is true across multiple areas of legislation.

Pallone, US Congressional Representative, 2003 Text of H.R. 3189, introduced by Pallone,
to amend Title XVII of the Social Security Act,” 9/25,
http://www.theorator.com/bills108/hr3189.html
`(7) SUBSTANTIAL REDUCTION- The term `substantial reduction'--
`(A) means, as determined under regulations of the Secretary and with respect to a
qualified beneficiary, a reduction in the average actuarial value of benefits under the plan
(through reduction or elimination of benefits, an increase in premiums, deductibles,
copayments, and coinsurance, or any combination thereof), since the date of
commencement of coverage of the beneficiary by reason of the retirement of the covered
employee (or, if later, January 6, 2004), in an amount equal to at least 50 percent of the
total average actuarial value of the benefits under the plan as of such date (taking into
account an appropriate adjustment to permit comparison of values over time); and
`(B) includes an increase in premiums required to an amount that exceeds the premium
level described in the fourth sentence of section 602(3).'
In the context of joint acquisition programs, substantial reductions must be a
funding or quantity decrease of at least 50% of total funding or quantity from
the previous year’s budget.
Defense Acquisition University, 2008, “Resource Allocation Process”,
https://learn.dau.mil/CourseWare/804197_5/course/.../print_version.pdf
Termination or Reduction in Participation in Joint Acquisition Programs “The DoD
Components shall not terminate or substantially reduce participation in joint ACAT ID
or ACAT IAM programs without Requirements Authority review and USD(AT&L)
approval; or in joint ACAT IA programs without Requirements Authority review
approval. The USD(AT&L) may require a DoD Component to continue some or all
funding, as necessary, to sustain the joint program in an efficient manner, despite
approving their request to terminate or reduce participation. Substantial reduction is
defined as a funding or quantity decrease of 50 percent or more in the total funding or
quantities in the latest President's Budget for that portion of the joint program funded by
the DoD Component seeking the termination or reduced participation.” (DoDI 5000.02)
The top right blue button is labeled International Cooperative Programs and when the
user selects this button, it brings up this text below:

Substantial is 50%
Pallone 3 – US Congressional Representative (Text of H.R. 3189, introduced by Pallone, to
amend Title XVII of the Social Security Act,” 9/25,
http://www.theorator.com/bills108/hr3189.html)

`(7) SUBSTANTIAL REDUCTION- The term `substantial reduction'-- `(A) means, as

determined under regulations of the Secretary and with respect to a qualified
beneficiary, a reduction in the average actuarial value of benefits under the plan (through
reduction or elimination of benefits, an increase in premiums, deductibles, copayments,
and coinsurance, or any combination thereof), since the date of commencement of
coverage of the beneficiary by reason of the retirement of the covered employee (or, if
later, January 6, 2004), in an amount equal to at least 50 percent of the total average
actuarial value of the benefits under the plan as of such date (taking into account an
appropriate adjustment to permit comparison of values over time); and `(B) includes an
increase in premiums required to an amount that exceeds the premium level described
in the fourth sentence of section 602(3).'
Limits Arguments
***General Limits
 All (Missile Systems)
About 100
Global Security 10 (US Missiles,
http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/systems/munitions/missile.htm)

Target
Air Ground Ship Submarine
SHIP-LAUNCHED
RIM-2 Terrier
RIM-7 Sea Sparrow
RIM-8 Talos
RIM-24 Tartar
RIM-46 Sea Mauler
RIM-50 Typhon
RIM-66 Standard MR
RIM-67 Standard ER
RIM-85
RIM-116 RAM
RIM-156 SM-2 TMD
RIM-161 SM-3
RIM-162 ESSM
AGM-84 Harpoon
BGM-109 Tomahawk
RGM-165 LASM

ALAM
HyStrike
HyFly
Fasthawk
JSSCM
RATTLRS
Affordable Weapon
AGM-84 Harpoon
BGM-109 Tomahawk RUM-139 VL ASROC
RUR-5 ASROC
SUBMARINE-LAUNCHED
AGM-84 Harpoon
BGM-109 Tomahawk
HyStrike
HyTech
JSSCM
AGM-84 Harpoon
BGM-109 Tomahawk
RUM-125 Sea Lance UUM-125 Sea Lance
UUM-44 SUBROC
AIR-LAUNCHED
AIM-7 Sparrow
AIM-9 Sidewinder
AIM-54 Phoenix
AIM-120 AMRAAM
AIM-132 ASRAAM
DRM / ASMT
AAAM
FIM-92A Stinger ATAS
2.75" APKWS
2.75" Hydra-70
5.0" Zuni
AGM-12 Bullpup
AGM-45 Shrike
AGM-53 Condor
AGM-62 Walleye
AGM-65 Maverick
AGM-78 Standard ARM
AGM-84 Harpoon
AGM-86 CALCM
AGM-88 HARM
AGM-114 Hellfire
AGM-122 Sidearm
AGM-123 Skipper
AGM-130
AGM-136 TACIT RAINBOW
AGM-137 TSSAM
AGM-142 HAVE NAP
AGM-154 JSOW
AGM-158 JASSM
Joint Common Missile
HyStrike
HyTech
JSSCM
RATTLRS
SHOC
Scorpion
AGM-84 Harpoon
AGM-119 Penguin
GROUND-LAUNCHED
CLAWS
FIM-43 Redeye
FIM-92A Stinger
HUMRAAM
MIM-23 Hawk
MIM-46 Mauler
MIM-72 Chaparral FAADS
MIM-104 Patriot
MEADS
SLAMRAAM
THAAD Joint Common Missile
FOTT
Javelin
LOSAT
M13 Shillelagh
M47 Dragon
M136 AT4
M220 TOW
SRAW Predator

ATACMS
ATACMS / BAT
EFOGM
M26 MLRS
M30 MLRS Guided
M31 GMLRS (Unitary)
M55
MGM-52 Lance
Net Fires

AHW
 All (Smart Bombs)
120
Global Security 10 (US Missiles,
http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/systems/munitions/missile.htm)

Walleye 1967
x
AGM-65 Maverick 27 1 ~40,000 1972 x
x x x
AGM-84 Harpoon / SLAM 100 ~6,000 1977 x
x
AGM-86C CALCM 1,100 +300 1991 x

AGM-88 HARM 50 ~19,000 1984

x x
AGM-123 Skipper 25 1985
x
AGM-130 30 500 1994 x

AGM-136 TACIT RAINBOW 430 0 XXX x x

x x x x
AGM-137 TSSAM 100 0 XXX x x x
x x x x
AGM-142 HAVE NAP 80 130 1992 x

AGM-154 JSOW 75 ~24,000 1998 x x x

x x x x x
AGM-158 JASSM100 4340 2003 x x x x
x x x
BGM-109 Tomahawk 1,100 2,000 1983

LOCAAS x x x x x x
x x
FRSW x x x x x x
x
ARRMD 1100 2010 x x x x x
x x
HyStrike / Fast Hawk 1300 2010 x x x x
x x x
SSV ??? x
x
Guided Bombs
Laser Guided Bombs range
km CEP
m quantity
current &
planned IOC A-10 B-52 B-1B B-2 F-15 F-16 F-117 F-14 F-18
BOLT-117 0 1968
GBU-10 Paveway II 2000lb 15 8 11,000 1976 x
x x x x x
GBU-12 Paveway II 500lb 15 8 32,0001976 x
x x x x x
GBU-16 Paveway II 1000lb 15 8 1976 x
x x x x x
GBU-24 Paveway III 2000lb 20 8 13,000 1983 x
x x x x
GBU-27 HAVE VOID 20 8 3,200 1987
x
GBU-28 "bunker buster" 10 8 300 1991
x
TV/IR Guided Bombs
GBU-15 TV/IR guided 10 3 +2,000 1985
x
GPS Guided Bombs
GBU-15 GPS-mod 10 3 ~1,500 1999
x
GBU-24 E/B Paveway III 2000lb 20 8 2000 x
x x x x
GBU-28 E/B "bunker buster" 10 8 350 2002
x
GBU-29 JDAM 250lb 10 13 87,0001997 x x x
x x x x x
GBU-30 JDAM 500lb x x x x x x x
x
GBU-31 JDAM 2000lb x x x x x x x
x
GBU-32 JDAM 1000lb x x x x x x x
x
GBU-35 JDAM 1,000lb x x x x x x x
x
GBU-36 GAM 2,000 lb 10 6 128 1996 x

GBU-37 GAM 4,500 lb 10 6 100 1996 x

GBU-38 JDAM 500lb x x x x x x x

x
GBU-39 SDB 250lb MMC [ex-SBS] 100 13 12,000 2006

GBU-39 FLM 250lb 100 13 450 ? 2008

GBU-40 SDB 250lb 100 4 12,000 2014

GBU-43/B MOAB ---

GBU- ADW x x x x x
x x
GBU- DSHTW / Big BLU --- x
GBU- MDBDA x x x x
x x x
Diamond Back65 13

HardSTOP ---

LongShot 40 13 -0- N/A

SSBREX / SWAK 40 13

Other Guided Bombs

CBU-103 WCMD 40,000 1998 x x
x x x
CBU-104 WCMD 1998 x x x
x x
CBU-105 WCMD 1998 x x x
x x
CBU-107 PAW 2003 x x x
x x
BLU-118 Thermobaric / Hard Target

AMSTE PDAM / OWL

Targeting Pods IOC A-10 B-52 B-1B B-2 F-15 F-16 F-117 F-14
F-18
AN/AAQ-14 LANTIRN x x
x
AN/AAQ-28 LITENING x

AN/AAQ-X ATP Advanced Targeting Pod

x x
AN/AAS-35 Pave Penny x x

AN/AAS-38
x
AN/ASQ-213 HARM Targeting Systems (HTS)
x
AN/AVQ-12 Pave Spike

AN/AVQ-26 Pave Tack x

AN/AXQ-14 x

AN/AWW-7 Data Link Pod

x
AN/AWW-9 Data Link Pod
x
AN/AWW-12 Data Link Pod
x
AN/AWW-13 Advanced Data Link x
x
AN/AWW-14 Data Link Pod
x
IRADS x
ATFLIR
x
 All (Ground Systems)
About 1000
Global Security 10 (Ground Systems,
http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/systems/ground/index.html)

Direct Fire
Indirect Fire
Command &
Combat
Support Combat
Service
Support
TRACKED
TANKS
M1 Abrams
M1 Combat Car
M2 Stuart
M3 Stuart
M3 Lee
M4 Sherman
M5 Stuart
M6
M8 Buford AGS
M18 Hellcat
M22 Locust
M24 Chaffee
M26 Pershing
M41 Walker
M45 Pershing
M46 Patton
M47 Patton
M48 Patton
M50 Ontos
M56 Scorpion
M60 Patton
M67 Flamethrower
M103
M551 Sheridan
M803
M1917
M1918
Mark VIII
MBT-70

INFANTRY VEHICLES
AAVP7A1
CAV
EFV
FCS
FSCS / Tracer
FIV
LVT
LVT1 Alligator
LVT2 Water Buffalo
LVT3 Bushmaster
LVT4 Water Buffalo
LVTP5
LVTP7
M2 Bradley IFV
M3 Bradley CFV
M39 APC
M44 APC
M59 APC
M75 APC
M113
M132
XM701 MICV
XM723 MICV
XM734 MICV
XM765 AIFV
XM800 ARSV
M901 ITV
MEFFV
Stingray

AIR DEFENSE
M6 Linebacker
M42 Duster
M163 PIVADS
M167 VADS
M247 DIVAD
M730 Chaparral
ADATS
AN/VLQ-7 Stingray
XUV
Self Propelled Howitzer
Artillery Rockets
M7
M12
M40
M44
M52
M53
M55
M106
M107
M108
M109
M109A6 Paladin
M110
M125
M270 MLRS
M992 FAASV
M993 MLRS
M1064
M2001 Crusader
M2002 RSV
ENGINEERS
AAVC7A1
AAVR7A1
D7G MCAP
DEUCE
ESMB
HYEX
M1 ABV
M1 Grizzly
M1 MCBS
M1 Panther
M1/2 BCV
M2A2ODS-E EBFV
M4 C2V
M7 FIST
M9 ACE
AP
M58 Wolf
M60 AVLB
M60 AVLM
M60 Panther
M88 Hercules
M104 Wolverine
M114 CRC
M157 SGS
M577
M578 VTR
M579
M728 CEV
M981 FISTV
M992 FDCV
M1015
M1059 Lynx
M1068 SICPS
M1070 EFV
MK154
Panther
T-9
AMEV
AMTV
M548
M973 SUSV
M1065 SUSV
M1066 SUSV
M1067 SUSV
M1108

WHEELED
Armored Car
AGMS
Avenger
FCS LOS
HTTV
M-ATV
IAV Stryker
IFAV
ITV
LAV
LAV-25
LAV-AD
LAV-AG
LAV-AT
LAV-105
LAV-150
LAV-300
LAV GEN III
LOSAT
LSV
M8 AUC
M16
M151 FAV
M706
M707 Knight
XM800 ASRV
M966 HMMWV TOW
M1036 TOW
M1045 HMMWV TOW
M1046 TOW
M1117 ASV
M1121 TOW
M1200 Armored Knight
RST-V
PEP
V-MADS
EFOGM
EFSS
FCS NLOS
IAV Stryker

LAV-EFSS
LAV-M
M-142 HIMARS
ATEC
ATLAS
FOL
GSTAMIDS
HMEE
Hydrema
LAV-C2
LAV-C2 FDC
LAV-E
LAV-MEWSS
LAV-R
M56 Coyote
M93 Fox NBCRS
Mini-Flail
Mongoose
MRAP
RCV
SEE
Volcano

M945 BT
M1977 CBT

Countermine
Trucks
HMMWV
MRAP
Jeep
CUCV
COMBATT
FHTV
FMTV
FTTS
JLTV
LMTV
MTV
MTVR
RCV
21st Century Truck
ATV
CTV DPV
FTTS
KLR 2250
LAV-A
LAV-AC
LAV-L
LAV-PC
LTV
M-Gator
MUV-R
MUV-R
Polaris
RTCC
RTCH

LVSR
MK48 LVS
M35
M151 Jeep
M246
M274
M561
M747 HET
M809
M810
M811
M812
M813
M814
M815
M816
M817
M818
M819
M820
M821
M872
M911 HET
M923
M925
M927 XLWB
M931 Tractor
M936 Medium Wrecker
M939
M977 HEMTT
M978 HEMTT
M983 HEMTT
M984 HEMTT
M985 HEMTT
M996 HMMWV Ambulance
M997 HMMWV Ambulance
M998 HMMWV
M1000 HETS
M1008 CUCV
M1009 CUCV
M1010 CUCV
M1025 HMMWV
M1026 HMMWV
M1028 CUCV
M1035 HMMWV
M1037 HMMWV
M1038 HMMWV
M1042 HMMWV
M1043 HMMWV
M1044 HMMWV
M1069 Tractor
M1070 HETS
M1074 PLS
M1075 PLS
M1078 FMTV
M1079 FMTV
M1081 FMTV LVAD
M1082 MTV LMTVT
M1083 MTV
M1084 MTV
M1085 MTV LWB
M1086 MTV LWB
M1087 MTV
M1088 MTV
M1089 MTV
M1090 MTV
M1091 MTV
M1093 MTV LVAD
M1094 MTV LVAD
M1095 MTV MTVT
M1097 Heavy HMMWV
M1109 HMMWV
M1113 HMMWV
M1114 HMMWV
M1116 HMMWV
M1120 HEMTT
M1123 Heavy HMMWV
M1145 HMMWV
TOWED
Towed Artillery
FDSWS
Little David
M1 8-inch
M1 240mm
M-2A1 105mm
M-2A2 155mm
M8
M18
M59
M65
M101
M102
M114
M115
M119
M198
M204
M240
M777 LW155
M58 MICLIC
M128 GEMSS
MK155
ROWPU
INFANTRY SMALL ARMS AND LIGHT WEAPONS
CREW SERVED
SNIPER RIFLES
M21
M24
M40
M82
M107
M109
M110
MK11 / SR 25
MK12 SPR

MACHINE GUNS
M1917
M1919
M2
M37
M60
M73
M85
M219
M240
M307
M312
XM806
Mk 19
Mk 47 ALGL
Mk 48
ACSW

RECOILLESS WEAPONS
FIM-92 Stinger
FOTT
Javelin
M9 2.36-Inch
M18 57mm
M20 75mm
M20 3.5-Inch
M27 105mm
M40 106mm
M47 Dragon
M67 90mm
M202 FLASH
M220 TOW
MORTARS
M29 81-mm
M30 107-mm
M120 120-mm
M121 120-mm
M224 60-mm
M252 81-mm

MFSS 120-mm
INDIVIDUAL
HANDGUN
M1911
M1917
M9 Beretta
M11 Pistol
Mk 23
FHS
JCP
.38 Pistols and Revolvers

SUBMACHINE GUNS
M1928 Thompson
M1 Thompson
M3 SMG
MP5N

SHOTGUN
M26 MASS
12-gauge Shotguns

NON-LETHAL
M234
MRCD
RIFLES
M1903
M1 Garand
M14
M16
XM25 ISAAS
XM29 OICW
Mk 16 SCAR-L
Mk 17 SCAR-H
ACR
LSAT
OICW
SABR
SPIW

CARBINES
M1 Carbine
M2 Carbine
M3 Carbine
M4 Carbine
XM8 Lightweight Carbine
AUTOMATIC RIFLES
M1918 BAR
M1941
M249 SAW
Mk 46
LSAT

RECOILLESS WEAPONS
M3 MAAWS
M72 LAW
M136 AT4
M141 SMAW-D
Mk 153 SMAW
EGLM
FOTS
MPIM
Predator
SRAW
UAW

GRENADE LAUNCHER
M32
M79
M203
M320
Mk 13 EGLM
Mk 14

M138 FLIPPER
OTHER SYSTEMS
DEFENSE / COUNTERMEASURES
Soldier Equipment
Land Warrior
Objective Force Warrior

Body Armor
ACH
ACVCH
BLPS
Interceptor
ISAPO
LWH
MEPS
MICH
PASGT
PASGT-V
RBA

Uniforms
BDU
ACU

Camouflage
Camo Paint
Ghillie Suit
LCCS net
Electronic warfare (EW)
AN/GLQ-16 Shortstop
AN/PLQ-7 Shortstop
AN/PRD-10 MPRDFS
AN/PRD-11 MINI-FIX
AN/PRD-12 LMRDFS
AN/TLQ-17 TRAFFICJAM
AN/ULQ-19 RACJAM
AN/VLQ-9 Shortstop
AN/VLQ-10 Shortstop
AN/VLQ-11 Shortstop
CREW
Warlock

HEXJAM

Combat ID
AN/PSC-12
AN/PSX-1
AN/VSC-9 BCIS
AN/VSX-4 BCIS
BCIS
Budd Light
CCID
CIDDS
CIP
ICIDS
Phoenix Light
CBW Defense
ACIPS
BDO
CAM
CBPS
CPO
E-NBC
ICAM
ITAP
JBPDS
JCAD
JFIRE
JSGPM
JSLIST
JSLNBCRS
JSLSCAD
LR-BSDS
M17
M21
M22
M31 BIDS
M40
M45
M48
MDS
MICAD
STEPO
Radiological Defense
AARS
AN/PDR-75
AN/PDR-77
AN/UDR-13
AN/VDR-2

Countermine
AN/PSS-12
HSTAMIDS
MIMID

Smoke Launchers
M6 CD
M7 LVOSS
Air Defense
AN/MPQ-49 FAAR
AN/UPS-3 TDAR

Active Protection
CIAPS
FCLAS
IAAPS

C-RAM
COMMUNICATIONS, COMMAND, CONTROL
LandWarNet
FAAD-C2I
FAAD-GBS Sentinel

AN/GSQ-187 IREMBASS
AN/GSQ-187 REMBASS
AN/PPS-5 GSR
AN/PPS-15 GSR
Raptor

Night Vision
AN/AVS-2
AN/PVS-4
AN/PVS-5
AN/PVS-7
AN/PVS-10
AN/PVS-14
AN/PXX TLOS
ENVG
AN/TVS-5

AN/TRS-2 PEWS

Bugle Calls
AFATDS
Tacfire

Counter-Battery Radar
AN/TPQ-36 Firefinder
AN/TPQ-37 Firefinder
AN/TPQ-47 Firefinder
Firefinder
G/ATOR
Multi-Mission Radar
Rangefinders
AN/GVS-5
AN/PAQ-1 LTD
AN/PAQ-3 MULE
AN/PED-1 LLDR
AN/PEQ-1 SOFLAM
AN/PVS-6 MELIOS
AN/TVQ-2 G/VLLD
GLTD II
PTS-180
TLDHS
AEROS

ASTAMIDS Radio
JTRS

SINCGARS
MIDS-LVT

AN/GRC-206
AN/PRC- 11
AN/PRC- 77
AN/PRC-104
AN/PRC-113
AN/PRC-119
AN/PRC-126
AN/PRC-127
AN/PRC-177
AN/VRC- 12
AN/VRC- 24

AN/TTC-39 TRI-TAC
AN/TTC-46
AN/TTC-48
ABCS
ATCCS

Applique
ADOCS
AWIS
BITS
CINC-TMD
CPOF
CSSCS
CSSCS-EAC
EPLRS
FBCB2
Internet-T
JTIDS
MCS
MFCS
MSE
PLRS
REGENCY NET
STCCS
TOC-AD
TOC-AV
TOC-FP
WIN
WIN-T
WIN-T
OTHER EQUIPMENT
MRE
FOL
Joint HPSSL

MILES Ribbon Bridge

Improved Ribbon Bridge
DGPDs
MEP

Force Provider

Container
 All (Ammunition)
A lot
Global Security 10 (Ammo,
http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/systems/munitions/ammo.htm)

Munitions (IM)
Rocket-Assisted Projectiles
Base Bleed Projectiles
Smoke
Non-Lethal Weapons
5.56-mm Cartridges
6.8mm Cartridges
7.62mm Cartridges
9mm Cartridges
.30 Caliber Cartridges
.45 Caliber Cartridges
.50 Caliber Cartridges
12 Gauge Cartridges

20-mm Cartridges
25-mm Cartridges
30-mm Cartridges
40-mm Cartridges

57-mm RCL Cartridges

75-mm RCL Cartridges
84-mm RCL Cartridges
90-mm RCL Cartridges
106-mm RCL Cartridges

90-mm Tank
105-mm Tank
120-mm Tank
152-mm Tank

Naval Projectiles
57-mm Projectile
3 inch Projectile
5 inch Projectile
6 inch Projectile
8 inch Projectile
16 inch Projectile Artillery Projectiles
105 mm Projectiles
155 mm Projectiles
175 mm Projectiles
203 mm Projectiles

Mortar Cartridges
Rockets
EFOGM
M26 MLRS
M30 MLRS Guided
M39 ATACMS
M39 ATACMS / BAT
M48 Chaparral FAADS
M55

Smoke Cartridges
66-mm Projectiles
Land Mines
FASCAM
M14 APM
M15 ATM
M16 APM
M18 APM Claymore
M19 ATM
M21 ATM
M23 VX
M67 ADAM
M70 RAAMS
M72 ADAM
M73 RAAMS
M86 PDM
M93 WAM Hornet
M131 MOPMS
M1023 RADAM
NSD-A
Hand Grenades

Demolitions
M2 SLAM
M112 C4
M118 C4
M150 PAM
M180
M300 FPE
M303 SOFDK

M1A1 Bangalore
APOBS
 All (Bases)
Globemaster No Date (MILITARY BASES DIRECTORY,
http://www.globemaster.de/regbases.html)

1. Army Airfields, Army Camps, Army Barracks (SEARCH / QUICK FIND)

A. P. Hill Army Airfield, Fort A. P. Hill (Fredericksburg), VA, USA

Aberdeen Proving Ground (AAF Phillips), Aberdeen, MD, USA
Aberdeen Proving Ground (AASF Weide), Edgewood Arsenal, MD, USA
Akron-Canton Regional Airport, Akron, OH, USA
Allen Army Airfield, Fort Greely (Delta Junction), AK, USA
Allen C. Perkinson Airport (AAF Blackstone), Blackstone, VA, USA
Amedee Army Airfield, Herlong, CA, USA
Arlington Heights Army Heliport, Arlington Heights, IL, USA
Armstrong Army Heliport, Buedingen, Hessen, Germany
Bates Field (Mobile Regional Airport), Mobile, AL, USA
Bicycle Lake Army Airfield, Fort Irwin (Barstow), CA, USA
Biggs Army Airfield, Fort Bliss (El Paso), TX, USA
Bismarck Army Airfield, Bismarck (MAP), ND, USA
Blackstone Army Airfield, Fort Pickett (Blackstone), VA, USA
Blue Grass Station Army Heliport, Blue Grass St., KY, USA
Bradshaw Army Airfield, Camp Pohakuloa, HI, USA
Brasschaat Army Airfield, Brasschaat, Belgium
Bryant Army Airfield, Fort Richardson (Anchorage), AK, USA
Bucholz Army Airfield, Kwajalein Atoll, Kiribati, Marshall Islands
Butts Army Airfield, Fort Carson (Colorado Springs), CO, USA
Cairns Army Airfield, Fort Rucker (Ozark), AL, USA
Camp Able-Sentry, Macedonia, Kosovo, Skopje
Camp Blanding Army Airfield, Camp Blanding (Starke), FL, USA
Camp Bondsteel (Army), Macedonia, Kosovo, Urosevac
Camp Comanche, Bosnia-Herzegowina
Camp Doha, Kuwait City, Kuwait
Camp Eagle (Army), Wonju, Korea
Camp Gary Owen (Army), Munsan, Korea
Camp Henry (Army), Taegu, Korea
Camp McCoy Army Airfield, Sparta, WI, USA
Camp Monteith, Macedonia, Kosovo, Gnjilane
Camp Page (Army), Chunchon, Korea
Camp Udairi, Kuwait City, Kuwait
Camp Walker (Army), Taegu, Korea
Campbell Army Airfield, Fort Campbell (Hopkinsville), KY, USA
Castle Dome Army Heliport, Yuma Proving Ground (Yuma), AZ, USA
Charles L. Kelly Army Heliport, Fort Sam Houston, TX, USA
Cochran Army Airfield, Camp Stanley (Uijongbu), Korea
Coleman Army Airfield, Mannheim, Baden-Wuerttemberg, Germany
Combat Maneuver Training Center (CMTC) - Hohenfels AAF, Regensburg, Bayern,
Germany
Condron Army Airfield, White Sands, NM, USA
Conn Barracks (AHP Schweinfurt), Schweinfurt, Bayern, Germany
Davison Army Airfield, Fort Belvoir (Alexandria), Virgina, USA
Desiderio Army Airfield, Camp Humphreys (Pyongtaek), Korea
Dugway Proving Ground (AAF Michael), UT, USA
Dyess Army Airfield, Roi-Naumur, Kiribati, Marshall Islands
Felker Army Airfield, Fort Eustis (Yorktown), VA, USA
Fliegerhorst Kaserne (AAF Hanau), Hanau, Hessen, Germany
Forney Army Airfield, Fort Leonard Wood (Waynesville), MO, USA
Fort Devens (Moore Army Airfield), Ayer, MA, USA
Fort Gordon HQ Helipad, Fort Gordon (Augusta), GA, USA
Fort Harrison Army Airfield, Helena, MT, USA
Fort Kobbe (Army), Colon, Panama
Fort Lee Army Heliport, Fort Lee (Petersburg), VA, USA
Fort Wolter Army Airfield, Mineral Wells, TX, USA
Fritzsche Army Airfield (Marina MAP), Fort Ord (Marina), CA, USA
Giebelstadt Army Airfield, Giebelstadt (Wuerzburg), Bayern, Germany
Godman Army Airfield, Fort Knox (Louisville), KY, USA
Grafenwoehr Army Airfield, Grafenwoehr, Bayern, Germany
Gray Army Airfield, Fort Lewis (Tacoma), WA, USA
Hagler Army Airfield, Camp Shelby, MS, USA
Haley Army Airfield, Fort Sheridan, IL, USA
Hanau Army Airfield, Hanau, Hessen, Germany
Hanchey Army Airfield, Fort Rucker (Ozark), AL, USA
Hawkins Field (Jackson Army Air Support Facility), Jackson, MS, USA
Heidelberg Army Airfield, Heidelberg, Baden-Wuerttemberg, Germany
Helena Army Airfield, Helena (RAP), MT, USA
Henry Post Army Airfield, Fort Sill (Lawton), OK, USA
Hohenfels Army Airfield, Hohenfels (Regensburg), Bayern, Germany
Hood Army Airfield, Fort Hood (Killeen), TX, USA
Hunter Army Airfield, Fort Stewart (Savannah), GA, USA
Iowa Army NG Heliport, Waterloo, IA, USA
Jackson Army Air Support Facility (Hawkins Field), Jackson, MS, USA
Kastner Army Airfield, Camp Zama, Japan
Katterbach Barracks Army Airfield, Ansbach, Bayern, Germany
Knox Army Heliport, Fort Rucker (Ozark), AL, USA
Laguna Army Airfield, Yuma Proving Ground (Yuma), AZ, USA
Lawson Army Airfield, Fort Benning (Columbus), GA, USA
Libby Army Airfield, Fort Huachuca (Sierra Vista), AZ, USA
Los Alamitos Army Airfield, Los Alamitos, CA, USA
Lowe Army Airfield, Fort Rucker (Ozark), AL, USA
Mabry Army Heliport, Austin, TX, USA
Mackall Army Airfield, Camp Mackall (Hoffman), NC, USA
Marina Muncipal Airport (AAF Fritzsche), Marina, CA, USA
Marshall Army Airfield, Fort Riley (Manhattan), KS, USA
Martindale Army Airfield, Fort Houston (San Antonio), TX, USA
Mather Army Air Support Facility, Sacramento, CA, USA
Mayaguana Army Airfield, Mayaguana, Bahamas
McKenna Army Airfield, Columbus, GA, USA
Michael Army Airfield, Dugway Proving Ground, UT, USA
Mobile Regional Airport (AAF), Mobile, AL, USA
Montgomery Army Airfield (County AP), Conroe, TX, USA
Moore Army Airfield (Fort Devens), Ayer, MA, USA
Morris Army Airfield, Forest Park, GA, USA
Muir Army Airfield, Fort Indiantown (Harrisburg), PA, USA
Oakdale Army Heliport, Oakdale, PA, USA
O'Sullivan Army Heliport, Camp San Luis Obispo, CA, USA
Papago Army Airfield, Phoenix, AZ, USA
Patton Barracks (AAF Heidelberg), Heidelberg, Baden-Wuerttemberg, Germany
Pentagon Army Heliport, Washington, DC, USA
Phillips Army Airfield, Aberdeen Proving Ground (Aberdeen), MD, USA
Polk Army Airfield, Fort Polk (Leesville), LA, USA
Quonset Army Airfield (State Airport), North Kingston, RI, USA
Raleigh-Durham Army Airfield, Morrisville (IAP), NC, USA
Ray S. Miller Army Airfield, Camp Ripley (Little Falls), MN, USA
Red River Army Heliport, Texarkana, TX, USA
Redstone Army Airfield, Huntsville, AL, USA
Robert Gray Army Airfield, Fort Hood (Killeen), TX, USA
Roberts Army Airfield, Camp Roberts (San Miguel), CA, USA
Robinson Army Airfield, Camp Robinson (Little Rock), AR, USA
Sabre Army Heliport, Fort Campbell (Clarksville), TN, USA
Sacramento Army Air Support Facility, Sacramento, CA, USA
Schweinfurt Army Heliport, Schweinfurt, Bayern, Germany
Shell Army Heliport, Fort Rucker (Enterprise), AL, USA
Sherman Army Airfield, Fort Leavenworth, KS, USA
Sierra Vista Muncipal Airport (AAF Libby), Sierra Vista, AZ, USA
Simmons Army Airfield, Fort Bragg (Fayetteville), NC, USA
Smyrna Army Airfield, Smyrna, TN, USA
South Carolina Army Air Support Facility, Eastover, SC, USA
Stallion Army Airfield, Socorro, NM, USA
Stockton Army Airfield, Stockton (Metro AP), CA, USA
Storck Barracks Army Airfield, Illesheim, Bayern, Germany
Stuttgart Army Airfield, Stuttgart-Echterdingen, Baden-Wuerttemberg, Germany
Tipton (AP) Army Airfield, Fort George G. Meade (Odenton), MD, USA
Truax Field, Corpus Christi (NAS), TX, USA
Tupelo Army Air Support Facility, Tupelo, MS, USA
Tusi Army Heliport, Fort Hunter (Jolon), CA, USA
Vagabond Army Airfield, Yakima, WA, USA
Wainwright Army Airfield, Fort Wainwright (Fairbanks), AK, USA
Wake Island Army Airfield, Wake Island, USA
Waynesville RAP (AAF Forney), Fort Leonard Wood, MO, USA
Weide Army Air Support Facility, Edgewood Arsenal, MD, USA
Wheeler Army Airfield, Wahiawa (Oahu), HI, USA
Wheeler-Sack Army Airfield, Fort Drum (Watertown), NY, USA
Wiesbaden Army Airfield, Wiesbaden-Erbenheim, Hessen, Germany
Wright Army Airfield, Fort Stewart (Hinesville), GA, USA
Yuma Proving Ground (AAF Laguna), Yuma, AZ, USA
Yuma Proving Ground (AHP Castle Dome), Yuma, AZ, USA

2. Air Force Bases (Non CONUS) (SEARCH / QUICK FIND)

Ahmed Al Jaber Air Base, Kuwait

Akrotiri Royal Air Force Base, Akrotiri, Cyprus
Al Dhafra Air Base, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
Al Udeid Air Base, Al Udeid, Qatar
Alconbury Royal Air Force Base, Huntingdon (Cambridgeshire), UK
Ali Air Base, Nasiriyah, Iraq
Ali Al Salem Air Base, Kuwait
Andersen Air Base, Yigo, Guam
Aviano Air Base, Aviano, Pordenone, Italy
Bagram Air Base, Parvan, Charikar, Afghanistan
Balad Air Base, Balad, Iraq
Bitburg Air Base, Bitburg, Rheinland-Pfalz, Germany
Camp Adder (Ali Air Base), Nasiriyah, Iraq
Camp Anaconda (Balad Air Base), Balad, Iraq
Cha Shan Air Base, Hualien, Taiwan
Cheong Ju Air Base, Cheong Ju, Korea
Clark Air Base, Balibago (Luzon), Philippines
Croughton Royal Air Force Base, Croughton (Oxfordshire), UK
Diego Garcia (Air Force), Diego Garcia, BIOT
Einsiedlerhof Air Station, Kaiserslautern, Rheinland-Pfalz, Germany
Eloy Alfaro Air Base, Manta, Ecuador
Eskan Village Air Base, Saudi Arabia
Fairford Royal Air Force Base, Fairford (Gloucestershire), UK
Feltwell Royal Air Force Base, Thetford (Norfolk), UK
Ganci Air Base (Manas Intl. Airport), Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan
Geilenkirchen Air Base (NATO), Geilenkirchen, NRW, Germany
Ghedi Air Base, Vicenza, Italy
Greenham Common Royal Air Force Base, Greenham (Newbury), UK
Hahn Air Base, Hahn, Rheinland-Pfalz, Germany
Howard Air Base, Panama City, Panama
Hualien Air Base (Cha Shan), Hualien, Taiwan
Incirlik Air Base, Adana, Turkey
Istres Air Base, Istres, France
Izmir Air Base, Izmir, Turkey
Kadena Air Base, Kadena, Okinawa, Japan
Kandahar Air Base, Kandahar, Afghanistan
Kapaun Air Station (KNCOA), Kaiserslautern, Rheinland-Pfalz, Germany
Khanabad Air Base, Khanabad, Uzbekistan
Khost Airbase, Paktia, Khost, Afghanistan
Kimhae Air Base, Pusan, Korea
King Abdul Aziz Air Base, Dhahran, Saudi Arabia
King Fahd Air Base, Taif, Saudi Arabia
King Khalid Air Base, Khamis Mushayt, Saudi Arabia
Kunsan Air Base, Kunsan City, Korea
Lajes Field Air Base, Terceira Island, Azores, Portugal
Lakenheath Royal Air Force Base, Lakenheath (Suffolk), UK
Mazar-e-Sharif Airbase, Mazar-e-Sharif, Afghanistan
Mildenhall Royal Air Force Base, Mildenhall (Suffolk), UK
Misawa Air Base, Misawa, Honshu, Japan
Molesworth Royal Air Force Base, Huntingdon (Cambridgeshire), UK
Moron Air Base, Sevilla, Spain
Osan Air Base, Osan, Korea
Paya Lebar Air Base, Sembawang, Singapore
Ramstein Air Base, Ramstein, Rheinland-Pfalz, Germany
Rhein-Main Air Base, Frankfurt/Main, Hessen, Germany
Richmond Royal Australian Air Force Base, Australia
Riyadh Air Base, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
San Vito dei Normanni Air Station, Brindisi, Italy
Sembach Air Base, Kaiserslautern, Rheinland-Pfalz, Germany
Seoul Air Base (K-16), Seoul, Korea
Soesterberg Air Base, Soesterberg, Netherlands
Sola Sea Air Base, Norway
Soto Cano Air Base (Camp Picket), Comayagua, Honduras
Spangdahlem Air Base, Spangdahlem, Rheinland-Pfalz, Germany
Stavanger Air Base, Stavanger, Norway
Suwon Air Base, Seoul, Korea
Taegu Air Base (K-2), Taegu, Korea
Tallil Air Base, Nasiriyah, Iraq
Taszar Air Base, Pecs, Hungary
Thule Air Base, Thule, Greenland, Denmark
Torrejon Air Base, Torrejon, Spain
Upper Heyford Royal Air Force Base, Upper Heyford (Oxfordshire), UK
Upwood Royal Air Force Base, Ramsey (Cambridgeshire), UK
Woomera Air Station, Woomera, Australia
Yokota Air Base, Tokyo, Honshu, Japan
Zweibruecken Air Base, Zweibruecken, Rheinland-Pfalz, Germany

3. Air Force Bases, Air Force Stations, Airfields (CONUS) (SEARCH / QUICK FIND)

Air Force Academy, Colorado Springs, CO, USA

Air University (Maxwell Air Force Base), Montgomery, AL, USA
Altus Air Force Base, Altus, OK, USA
Andrews Air Force Base, Camp Springs, MD, USA
Arnold Air Force Base, Manchester, TN, USA
Avon Park Air Force Station, Avon Park, FL, USA
Barksdale Air Force Base, Bossier City, LA, USA
Beale Air Force Base, Marysville, CA, USA
Bellows Air Force Station, Kaneohe (Ohau), HI, USA
Bolling Air Force Base, Washington, DC, USA
Brooks Air Force Base, San Antonio, TX, USA
Buckley Air Force Base, Aurora, CO, USA
Cannon Air Force Base, Clovis, NM, USA
Cape Canaveral Air Force Station, Cape Canaveral, FL, USA
Cape Cod Air Force Station, Bourne, MA, USA
Cape Lisburne Air Force Station, Cape Lisburne, AK, USA
Cape Newenham Air Force Station, Cape Newenham, AK, USA
Cape Romanzof Air Force Station, Cape Romanzof, AK, USA
Carswell Air Force Base, Fort Worth, TX, USA
Castle Air Force Base, Merced, CA, USA
Cavalier Air Force Station, Fordville, ND, USA
Charleston Air Force Base, North Charleston, SC, USA
Cheyenne Mountain Air Force Station, Colorado Springs, CO, USA
Clear Air Force Station, Clear, AK, USA
Columbus Air Force Base, Columbus, MS, USA
Creech Air Force Base, Indian Springs, NV, USA
Davis-Monthan Air Force Base, Tucson, AZ, USA
Dover Air Force Base, Dover, DE, USA
Duke Field Air Force Station, Crestview, FL, USA
Dyess Air Force Base, Abilene, TX, USA
Eareckson Air Station, Shemya Island, AK, USA
Edwards Air Force Base, Rosamond, CA, USA
Eglin Air Force Auxiliary Field (AFS Duke Field), Crestview, FL, USA
Eglin Air Force Base, Valparaiso, FL, USA
Eielson Air Force Base, North Pole, AK, USA
Eldorado Air Force Station, TX, USA
Ellsworth Air Force Base, Rapid City, SD, USA
Elmendorf Air Force Base, Anchorage, AK, USA
England Air Force Base, Alexandria, Lousiana, USA
Fairchild Air Force Base, Airway Heights, WA, USA
Falcon Air Force Base, Colorado Springs, CO, USA
Francis E. Warren Air Force Base, Cheyenne, WY, USA
George Air Force Base, Victorville, CA, USA
Gila Bend Auxiliary Field, Gila Bend, AZ, USA
Goodfellow Air Force Base, San Angelo, TX, USA
Grand Forks Air Force Base, Emerado, ND, USA
Griffiss Air Force Base, Rome, NY, USA
Hanscom Air Force Base, Bedford, MA, USA
Hickam Air Force Base, Honolulu, HI, USA
Hill Air Force Base, Ogden, UT, USA
Holloman Air Force Base, Alamogordo, NM, USA
Hurlburt Field, Mary Esther, FL, USA
Indian Springs Air Force Auxiliary Air Field, Indian Springs, NV, USA: see AFB Creech
K. I. Sawyer Air Force Base, Gwinn, MI, USA
Keesler Air Force Base, Biloxi, MS, USA
Kelly Air Force Base, San Antonio, TX, USA
King Salmon Air Force Base, King Salmon, AK, USA
Kirtland Air Force Base, Albuquerque, NM, USA
Lackland Air Force Base, San Antonio, TX, USA
Langley Air Force Base, Hampton, VA, USA
Laughlin Air Force Base, Del Rio, TX, USA
Little Rock Air Force Base, Jacksonville, AR, USA
Loring Air Force Base, Caribou, ME, USA
Los Angeles Air Force Base, El Segundo, CA, USA
Lowry Air Force Base, Denver, CO, USA
Luke Air Force Base, Litchfield Park, AZ, USA
MacDill Air Force Base, Tampa Bay, FL, USA
Malmstrom Air Force Base, Great Falls, MT, USA
Maxwell - Gunter Annex Air Force Base, Montgomery, AL, USA
McChord Air Force Base, Tacoma, WA, USA
McClellan Air Force Base, Sacramento, CA, USA
McConnell Air Force Base, Wichita, KS, USA
McGuire Air Force Base, Wrightstown, NJ, USA
Minot Air Force Base, Minot, ND, USA
Moody Air Force Base, Valdosta, GA, USA
Mountain Home Air Force Base, Mountain Home, ID, USA
Myrtle Beach Air Force Base, Myrtle Beach, SC, USA
Nellis Air Force Base, Las Vegas, NV, USA
New Boston Air Force Station, New Boston, NH, USA
Newark Air Force Station, Heath, OH, USA
North Auxiliary Airfield, North, SC, USA
Norton Air Force Base, San Bernadino, CA, USA
Offutt Air Force Base, Bellevue, NE, USA
Onizuka Air Force Station, Sunnyvale, CA, USA
Patrick Air Force Base, Cocoa Beach, FL, USA
Peterson Air Force Base, Colorado Springs, CO, USA
Pope Air Force Base, Fayetteville, NC, USA
Randolph Air Force Base, Universal City, TX, USA
Reese Air Force Base, Lubbock, TX, USA
Robins Air Force Base, Warner Robins, GA, USA
Schriever Air Force Base, Colorado Springs, CO, USA
Scott Air Force Base, Belleville, IL, USA
Seymour Johnson Air Force Base, Goldsboro, NC, USA
Shaw Air Force Base, Sumter, SC, USA
Shemya Air Force Base, Shemya Island, AK, USA
Sheppard Air Force Base, Wichita Falls, TX, USA
Tinker Air Force Base, Oklahoma City, OK, USA
Tonopah Test Range (TTR) Airfield, Tonopah, NV, USA
Travis Air Force Base, Fairfield, CA, USA
Tyndall Air Force Base, Panama City, FL, USA
Vance Air Force Base, Enid, OK, USA
Vandenberg Air Force Base, Lompoc, CA, USA
Whiteman Air Force Base, Knob Noster, MO, USA
Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Fairborn, OH, USA

4. Air Reserve Bases, Air Reserve Stations (SEARCH / QUICK FIND)

Warren Regional Airport (Youngstown Air Reserve Station), Vienna, OH, USA
Bergstrom Air Reserve Station, Austin, TX, USA
Carswell Air Reserve Station, Fort Worth, TX, USA
Dobbins Air Reserve Base, Marietta, GA, USA
General Billy Mitchell Air Reserve Station, Milwaukee, WI, USA
Grissom Air Reserve Base, Bunker Hill, IN, USA
Homestead Air Reserve Base, Homestead, FL, USA
March Air Reserve Base, Sunny Mead, CA, USA
Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport Air Reserve Station, Minneapolis (IAP), MN,
USA
Niagara Falls Air Reserve Station, Niagara Falls (IAP), NY, USA
Pittsburgh Air Reserve Station (IAP), Coraopolis, PA, USA
Richards-Gebaur Air Force Reserve Station, Kansas City, MO, USA
Westover Air Reserve Base, Chicopee, MA, USA
Willow Grove Air Reserve Station, Hatboro, PA, USA
Youngstown Air Reserve Station (RAP Warren), Vienna, OH, USA

5. Air National Guard Bases (SEARCH / QUICK FIND)

Allen C. Thompson Field Air National Guard Base, Jackson, MS, USA
Alpena County Regional Airport (ANGB), Alpena, MI, USA
Andrews Air National Guard Base (AFB), Camp Springs, MD, USA
Atlantic City Air National Guard Base (IAP), Egg Harbor Township, NJ, USA
Bangor Air National Guard Base, Bangor (IAP), ME, USA
Barnes Air National Guard Base, Westfield, MA, USA
Battle Creek Air National Guard Base, Battle Creek, MI, USA
Boise Air National Guard Base, Boise (MAP), ID, USA
Bradley Air National Guard Base, Windor Locks (IAP), CT, USA
Buckley Air National Guard Base, Aurora, CO, USA
Burlington Air National Guard Base, South Burlington (IAP), VT, USA
Byrd Field (ANGB IAP Richmond), Sandston, VA, USA
Capital Air National Guard Base, Springfield (MAP), IL, USA
Carswell Field Air National Guard Base (NAS Ft. Worth, JRB), Ft. Worth, TX, USA
Channel Islands Air National Guard Base, Point Mugu, CA, USA
Charlotte/Douglas International Airport (ANGB), Charlotte, NC, USA
Cheyenne Air National Guard Base, Cheyenne (MAP), WY, USA
Colonel Francis S. Gabreski Airport (ANGB), Westhampton Beach, NY, USA
Dane County Air National Guard Base (RAP), Madison, WI, USA
Dannelly Field Air National Guard Base, Montgomery (RAP), AL, USA
Des Moines Air National Guard Base, Des Moines (MAP), IA, USA
Dobbins Air National Guard Base (ARB), Marietta, GA, USA
Duluth Air National Guard Base, Duluth (IAP), MN, USA
Eastern West Virginia Air National Guard Base (RAP), Martinsburg, WV, USA
Ebbing Air National Guard Base, Fort Smith (MAP), AR, USA
Ellington Field Air National Guard Base, Houston, TX, USA
Forbes Field Air National Guard Base, Topeka, KS, USA
Fort Wayne Air National Guard Base, Fort Wayne (MAP), IN, USA
Fresno Air National Guard Base, Fresno, CA, USA
Galena Airport Air National Guard Base, Galena (AP), AK, USA
Gowen Field (ANGB Boise), Boise (MAP), ID, USA
Great Falls Air National Guard Base, Great Falls (IAP), MT, USA
Greater Peoria Air National Guard Base (RAP), Bartonville, IL, USA
Gulfport-Biloxi Regional Airport (ANGB), Gulfport, MS, USA
Hancock International Airport (ANGB), Syracuse, NY, USA
Harrisburg International Airport (ANGB), Middletown, PA, USA
Hector International Airport (ANGB), Fargo, ND, USA
Hondo Air National Guard Base, Hondo (MAP), TX, USA
Hulman Field (ANGB IAP Terre Haute), Terre Haute, IN, USA
Jacksonville Air National Guard Base (IAP), Callahan, FL, USA
Joe Foss Field Air National Guard Base, Sioux Falls, SD, USA
Key Field Air National Guard Base, Meridian, MS, USA
Kingsley Field Air National Guard Base, Klamath Falls, OR, USA
Kulis Air National Guard Base, Anchorage (IAP), AK, USA
Lambert-St. Louis International Airport (ANGB), St. Ann, MO, USA
Lincoln Air National Guard Base, Lincoln (MAP), NE, USA
Little Rock Air National Guard Base (AFB), Jacksonville, AR, USA
Louisville Air National Guard Base, Louisville (IAP), KY, USA
Mansfield Lahm Airport Air National Guard Base, Mansfield, OH, USA
Martin State Airport Air National Guard Base, Baltimore, MD, USA
McEntire Air National Guard Base, Columbia, SC, USA
McGhee Tyson Air National Guard Base, Alcoa, TN, USA
Memphis International Airport (ANGB), Oakville, TN, USA
Minneapolis-St. Paul Air National Guard Base, Minneapolis (IAP), MN, USA
Mitchell Field Air National Guard Base (IAP), Milwaukee, WI, USA
Montgomery Regional Airport (ANGB Dannelly Field), Montgomery, AL, USA
Munoz Air National Guard Base, San Juan (IAP), Puerto Rico
Nashville Metropolitan Airport (ANGB), Nashville, TN, USA
New Castle Air National Guard Base, New Castle County AP, DE, USA
O'Hare International Airport (ANGB), Chicago, IL, USA
Otis Air National Guard Base, Falmouth, MA, USA
Pease Air National Guard Base, Portsmouth, NH, USA
Phoenix Sky Harbour International Airport (ANGB), Phoenix, AZ, USA
Pittsburgh Air National Guard Base (IAP), Coraopolis, PA, USA
Portland Air National Guard Base (IAP), Portland, OR, USA
Quonset State Airport Air National Guard Base, North Kingston, RI, USA
Reno-Tahoe International Airport (ANGB), Reno, NV, USA
Richmond Air National Guard Base (IAP), Sandston, VA, USA
Rickenbacker Air National Guard Base (IAP), Columbus, OH, USA
Rosecrans Air National Guard Base, St. Joseph (MAP), MO, USA
Salt Lake Air National Guard Base, Salt Lake City (IAP), UT, USA
Savannah Air National Guard Base (IAP), Garden City, GA, USA
Selfridge Air National Guard Base, Mount Clemens, MI, USA
Shepherd Field ANGB (Eastern West Virginia RAP), Martinsburg, WV, USA
Sioux Gateway Airport (ANGB), Sioux City, IA, USA
Springfield-Beckley Muncipal Airport (ANGB), Springfield, OH, USA
Standiford Field (ANGB Louisville), Louisville (IAP), KY, USA
Stewart Air National Guard Base, Newburgh (IAP), NY, USA
Stratton Air Guard Base, Schenectady (County AP), NY, USA
Sumpter Smith Air National Guard Base, Birmingham (IAP), AL, USA
Terre Haute International AP (ANGB), Terre Haute, IN, USA
Toledo Express Airport Air National Guard Base, Swanton, OH, USA
Truax Field ANGB (Dane County Regional Airport), Madison, WI, USA
Tucson Air National Guard Base, Tucson IAP, AZ, USA
Tulsa Air National Guard Base, Tulsa (IAP), OK, USA
Volk Field Air National Guard Base, Camp Douglas, WI, USA
Will Rogers Air National Guard Base, Oklahoma City, OK, USA
Yeager Airport Air National Guard Base, Charleston, WV, USA

6. Coast Guard Air Stations (SEARCH / QUICK FIND)

Astoria Coast Guard Air Station, Warrenton, OR, USA

Atlantic City Coast Guard Air Station, Atlantic City, NJ, USA
Barbers Point Coast Guard Air Station, Ewa/Oahu, HI, USA
Borinquen Coast Guard Air Station, Aguadilla, Puerto Rico
Cape Cod Coast Guard Air Station, Bourne, MA, USA
Clearwater Coast Guard Air Station, Clearwater, FL, USA
Corpus Christi Coast Guard Air Station, Corpus Christi, TX, USA
Detroit Coast Guard Air Station, Detroit, MI, USA
Elizabeth City Coast Guard Air Station, Elizabeth City, NC, USA
Houston Coast Guard Air Station, Houston, TX, USA
Humboldt Bay Coast Guard Air Station, Humboldt Bay, CA, USA
Kodiak Coast Guard Air Station, Kodiak Island, AK, USA
Long Island Coast Guard Air Facility, New York City, NY, USA
Los Angeles Coast Guard Air Station, Los Angeles, CA, USA
Miami Coast Guard Air Station, Miami, FL, USA
Muskegon Coast Guard Air Facility, Muskegon, MI, USA
New Orleans Coast Guard Air Station, New Orleans, LA, USA
Newport North Bend Det. Coast Guard Air Facility, Newport, OR, USA
Port Angeles Coast Guard Air Station, Port Angeles, WA, USA
Sacramento Coast Guard Air Station, Sacramento, CA, USA
San Diego Coast Guard Air Station, San Diego, CA, USA
San Francisco Coast Guard Air Station, San Francisco, CA, USA
Savannah Coast Guard Air Station, Savannah, GA, USA
Sitka Coast Guard Air Station, Baranof Island, AK, USA
Traverse City Coast Guard Air Station, Traverse City, MI, USA

7. Marine Corps Air Stations, Marine Corps Bases (SEARCH / QUICK FIND)

Beaufort Marine Corps Air Station, Beaufort, SC, USA

Camp Lejeune Marine Corps Base, Jacksonville, NC, USA
Camp Pendleton Marine Corps Air Station, Oceanside, CA, USA
Cherry Point Marine Corps Air Station, Havelock, NC, USA
El Toro Marine Corps Air Station, Irvine, CA, USA
Futenma Marine Corps Air Station, Okinawa, Japan
Hawaii Marine Corps Base, Kailua, HI, USA
Iwakuni Marine Corps Air Station, Iwakuni, Honshu, Japan
Kaneohe Bay Marine Corps Air Facility (MCBH), Kailua, HI, USA
Miramar Marine Corps Air Station, San Diego, CA, USA
New River Marine Corps Air Station, Jacksonville, NC, USA
Tustin Marine Corps Air Station, Tustin, CA, USA
Twentynine Palms MCAGCC, Twentynine Palms, CA, USA
Yuma Marine Corps Air Station, Yuma, AZ, USA

8. Naval Air Stations, Naval Air Reserve Center, Naval Bases and Stations (SEARCH /
QUICK FIND)

Adak Naval Air Station, Adak, AK, USA

Agana Naval Air Station, Guam
Alameda Naval Air Station, Alameda, CA, USA
Andreos Island Naval Air Station, Bahamas
Atlanta Naval Air Station, Marietta, GA, USA
Atsugi Naval Air Facility, Sagamino, Honshu, Japan
Barbers Point Naval Air Station, Ewa/Oahu, HI, USA
Bremerton Naval Station, Bremerton, WA, USA
Brunswick Naval Air Station, Brunswick, ME, USA
Camp Smith Naval Air Station, Honolulu, HI, USA
Carswell Field (Fort Worth Naval Air Station Joint Reserve Base), Ft. Worth, TX, USA
Cecil Field Naval Air Station, Cecil Field, FL, USA
Chambers Field (NS Norfolk), Norfolk, VA, USA
China Lake Naval Air Station, China Lake, CA, USA
Columbus Naval Air Reserve Center, Columbus, OH, USA
Corpus Christi Naval Air Station, Corpus Christi, TX, USA
Cubi Point Naval Air Station (Subic Bay), Olongapo City, Philippines
David L. Macdonald Field (NS Mayport), Mayport, FL, USA
Denver Naval Air Reserve Center, Aurora, CO, USA
Diego Garcia Naval Support Facility, Diego Garcia, BIOT
El Centro Naval Air Facility, El Centro, CA, USA
Everett Naval Station, Everett, WA, USA
Fallon Naval Air Station, Fallon, NV, USA
Federal Airfield (NAS Moffett Field), Mountain View, CA, USA
Fort Worth Naval Air Station Joint Reserve Base, Ft. Worth, TX, USA
Glenview Naval Air Station, Glenview, IL, USA
Great Lakes Naval Station, Great Lakes, IL, USDA
Guam Naval Base, Guam
Guantanamo Bay Naval Air Station, Cuba
Halsey Field (NAS North Island), San Diego (Coronado, North Island), CA, USA
Jacksonville Naval Air Station, Jacksonville, FL, USA
Keflavik Naval Air Station, Reykjanes, Iceland
Key West Naval Air Station, Key West, FL, USA
Kingsville Naval Air Station, Kingsville, TX, USA
Kitsap Naval Base, Bremerton, WA, USA
La Maddalena Naval Support Activity, Sardinia, La Maddalena, Italy
Lajes Field Naval Air Station, Terceira Island, Azores, Portugal
Lakehurst Naval Air Station, Manchester, NJ, USA
Lemoore Naval Air Reserve Center, Lemoore, CA, USA
Lemoore Naval Air Station, Lemoore, CA, USA
Mayport Naval Station, Mayport, FL, USA
Memphis Naval Air Station, Millington, TN, USA
Meridian Naval Air Station, Meridian, MS, USA
Minneapolis Naval Air Reserve Center, Minneapolis, MN, USA
Miramar Naval Air Station, San Diego, CA, USA
Misawa Naval Air Facility, Misawa, Honshu, Japan
Moffett Field Naval Air Station, Mountain View, CA, USA
Naples Naval Support Activity, Naples, Italy
New Orleans Naval Air Station (JRB), Belle Chasse, LA, USA
Newport Naval Station, Newport, RI, USA
Norfolk Naval Air Station, Norfolk, VA, USA
Norfolk Naval Station, Norfolk, VA, USA
North Island Naval Air Station, San Diego (Coronado, North Island), CA, USA [pictures]
Oceana Naval Air Station, Virginia Beach, VA, USA
Patuxent River Naval Air Station, Patuxent River, MD, USA
Pensacola Naval Air Station, Pensacola, FL, USA
Point Mugu Naval Air Station, Oxnard, CA, USA
Port Hueneme, Port Hueneme, CA, USA
Roosevelt Roads Naval Air Station, Caguas, Puerto Rico
Rota Naval Air Station, Rota, Spain
San Diego Naval Station, San Diego, CA, USA [pictures]
San Jose Naval Air Reserve Center, San Jose, CA, USA
Santa Clara Naval Air Station, Mountain View, CA, USA
Seattle Naval Air Station, Seattle, WA, USA
Selfridge Naval Air Reserve Center, Mount Clemens (ANGB Selfridge), MI, USA
Sigonella Naval Air Station, Sigonella, Sicily, Italy
Souda Bay Naval Support Activity, Chania (Crete), Greece
South Weymouth Naval Air Station, South Weymouth, MA, USA
Subic Bay Naval Base, Olongapo City (Luzon), Philippines
Towers Field (NAS Jacksonville), Jacksonville, FL, USA
Washington Naval Air Facility (AFB Andrews), Camp Springs, MD, USA
Whidbey Island Naval Air Station, Oak Harbor, WA, USA
Whiting Field Naval Air Station, Milton, FL, USA
Willow Grove Naval Air Station (JRB), Willow Grove, PA, USA
Yokosuka Naval Station, Yokohama, Honshu, Japan
 All (Nukes)
Global Security 10 (http://www.globalsecurity.org/wmd/systems/nuclear.htm)
** Japan Limits
***Numbers
 All (50,000)
50,000 US troops are in Japan now.
US Department of State 10 (Bureau of East Asian and Pacific Affairs, “Japan”, March
31st, http://www.state.gov/r/pa/ei/bgn/4142.htm)

Japan provides bases and financial and material support to U.S. forward-deployed
forces, which are essential for maintaining stability in the region. Under the U.S.-Japan
Treaty of Mutual Cooperation and Security, Japan hosts a carrier battle group, the III
Marine Expeditionary Force, the 5th Air Force, and elements of the Army's I Corps. The
United States currently maintains approximately 50,000 troops in Japan, about half of whom are stationed
in Okinawa.

We have 53,360 troops in Japan

GlobalSecurity.org 10 (page last modified: 29-03-2010,
http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/deploy.htm)

United States ~370,000 133,000 Iraq-OIF (CENTCOM) 66,418 Germany (EUCOM) 53,360
Japan (PACOM)
 Air Force (13,000)

There are 13,000 soldiers supporting Air Force Operations in Japan

USFJ 11 (“About U.S. Forces Japan,” http://www.usfj.mil/)

The U.S. Air Forces, Japan/Fifth Air Force mission is to maintain the deterrent force posture of the
United States and to conduct offensive and defensive air operations, should deterrence
fail. Supporting that mission are approximately 13,000 military and civilian personnel located at
units throughout Japan. In addition to the tactical air roles, USAFJ provides theater
airlift and operational support with cargo airlift. USAFJ participates with the Japan Air
Self Defense Force in bilateral training exercises and the development of bilateral plans.
Fifth Air Force is headquartered at Yokota Air Base and is commanded by
COMUSJAPAN in a dual-hatted capacity.
 Army (2,000)
Army has 2,000 troops
USFJ 11 (“About U.S. Forces Japan,” http://www.usfj.mil/)

U.S. Army, Japan, consists of about 2,000 soldiers and is charged, during peacetime, with
operating port facilities and a series of logistics installations throughout Honshu and
Okinawa.
 Central Command (160)
Command has 160 troops
USFJ 11 (“About U.S. Forces Japan,” http://www.usfj.mil/)

Approximately 160 military, DoD civilians, and Japanese national employees comprise the
Commander, U.S. Forces, Japan's, (COMUSJAPAN) joint staff
 Civilians (3,000)
3,000
CSM 3/11 (US Navy poised to help Japan earthquake relief effort,
http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Military/2011/0311/US-Navy-poised-to-help-Japan-
earthquake-relief-effort)

Japan has long been one of the US military’s key base regions. There are some 38,000 US troops
stationed in Japan, along with 43,000 US family members and roughly 3,000 Department of
Defense civilians. While the US Navy continues to assess the state of its fleet, it is also
getting ships underway and clear of the rough coast in Hawaii and Seal Beach, San Diego
to protect them from turbulent seas and possible tsunami in the wake of the earthquake
that has devastated Japan, defense officials said Friday. “We’re moving things out from
affected areas and getting them inland,” says Col. Dave Lapan, Pentagon spokesman.
 Futenma (2,000)
Futenma houses fewer than four percent of troops in Japan
BBC News, 1-25-10, [“Japan 'May Rethink' US Futenma Air Base After Poll”,
http://www.commondreams.org/headline/2010/01/25-5]

Japan signed a deal with the US four years ago that was part of a broader realignment of
American troops. A key part of the plan was to relocate the Futenma air base, home to
about 2,000 Marines, to the smaller city of Nago. Okinawa is home to most of the
47,000 American troops based in Japan.

2,000
Time 10 (Why Japan and the U.S. Can't Live Without Okinawa, Jun 8 th,
http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1994798,00.html)

Indeed, under the world's only pacifist constitution, Japan spends about 1% of its gross
domestic product on defense. But the Japanese — and especially the Okinawans, whose
island was under U.S. control until 1972 and which currently hosts 75% of the U.S.
military presence in Japan — have expressed growing irritation at what they perceive as
their junior status in the relationship. Japan, they noted, has paid some $30 billion to
the U.S. to support the U.S. military presence in Japan since 1978. The reason for the
2006 agreement to move Futenma to a new facility in a less-populated part of Okinawa
is that the city of Ginowan now encroaches on the the current facility from all sides. The
$26 billion deal, to be largely funded by Japan, also calls for shifting 8,000 Marines from
Okinawa to Guam by 2014. For many in Okinawa, Futenma and its 2,000 American personnel have
been a perpetually noisy and polluting symbol of continuing U.S. dominance. But U.S. military leaders insist
that as long as the 3rd Marine Expeditionary Force is based on Okinawa, they need the air base, which
allows them to rapidly deploy Marines throughout the region. Stalder uses the analogy of a baseball
team to explain why the force can't do without its aircraft: "It does not do you any good
to have the outfielders practicing in one town, the catcher in another and the third
baseman somewhere else."
 Kadena (8,000)
Kadena Air Base 08 (Kadena Air Base, http://www.kadena.af.mil/main/welcome.asp)

Operating from the largest U.S. installation in the Asia-Pacific region, the 18th Wing defends U.S. and
Japanese mutual interests by providing aforward power projection platform with integrated,
deployable, combat power. The Wing operates a fleet of 81 combat-ready aircraft to
perform air superiority, aerial refueling, airborne warning and control, and combat
search and rescue functions. In addition, a force of 8,000 trained Airmen is postured to support Air
Force commitments in the Pacific region as well as U.S. military commitments around the
world. The 18th Wing is responsible for 54 F-15s, 15 KC-135s, 2 E-3s and 10 HH-60s
valued at more than $4 billion, as well as other equipment and capital assets valued at
nearly $2 billion. The base also provides infrastructure support to Army, Navy and
Marine Corps forces assigned to or transiting Kadena. Team Kadena includes associate
units from five other Air Force major commands, the U.S. Navy, and numerous other
Department of Defense agencies and direct reporting units. In addition to the 81 aircraft
of the 18th Wing, associate units operate more than 20 permanently assigned, forward-
based or deployed aircraft from Kadena on a daily basis.
 MEU (16,000)
The MEU has 16,000 troops
USFJ 11 (“About U.S. Forces Japan,” http://www.usfj.mil/)

III MEF, which is under the operational command of Marine Forces Pacific, consists of
approximately 16,000 Marines, which are garrisoned primarily on Okinawa and Southern
Honshu. III MEF is headquartered at Camp Courtney, Okinawa.
 Marine Corps (9,000)
There are 9,000 members of the Marine Corps in Japan
USFJ 11 (“About U.S. Forces Japan,” http://www.usfj.mil/)

U.S. Marine Corps Bases, Japan, consists of approximately 9,000 military and civilian personnel and
includes two air stations and nine camps/housing areas throughout Okinawa and
mainland Japan. Its primary mission is to provide installation support and services,
including force protection and quality of life, to forward-deployed Marine and Naval
forces, other service members, civilians, retirees, family members, and others associated
with U.S. Marine Corps Bases, Japan. HQs, U.S. Marine Corps Bases, Japan, is located at
Camp Foster, Okinawa.
 Naval Forces (19,000)
There are 6,000 Naval Forces in Japanese Bases
USFJ 11 (“About U.S. Forces Japan,” http://www.usfj.mil/)

Commander, Naval Forces, Japan, consisting of about 6,000 personnel, is responsible for maintaining
and operating the port facilities and providing base and logistic support for those surface, subsurface,
aviation and amphibious elements of the U.S. Seventh Fleet that operate from Japan as part of the
Forward Deployed Naval Forces (FDNF). U.S. Commander Navy Forces, Japan,
participates with the Japan Maritime Self Defense Force in exercises and planning. CNFJ
is headquartered at Yokosuka.

There are 13,000 Naval Forces on Japanese Ships

USFJ 11 (“About U.S. Forces Japan,” http://www.usfj.mil/)

U.S. Seventh Fleet, which is under the operation control of Commander, Pacific Fleet, has
about 13,000 sailors, 18 ships, and 100 airplanes operating from Japan as part of the Forward
Deployed Naval Forces.
 AT: There are more
That’s because we have bases in Guam and we rotate troops throughout the
United States
C7F 4/2 (This is an official U.S. Navy web site and the official web site for the U.S. 7th
Fleet, http://www.c7f.navy.mil/about.htm)

The Asia-Pacific region is one of the most dynamic areas of our rapidly-changing world. The fleet has to
be flexible and responsive to address a range of activities that are particularly important
in the region. It can take more than two weeks for a ship to get from San Diego to the
eastern boundary of the Area of Responsibility, and a similar amount of time to the
western boundary from Norfolk, Va. The presence of 7th Fleet’s forward-deployed forces facilitates
rapid response to natural and manmade crises in the region. At any given time, there are 60-70 ships, 200-
300 aircraft and 40,000 Navy and Marine Corps personnel assigned to the fleet. This includes forces
operating from bases in Japan and Guam and rotationally-deployed forces based in the United States.
Commander, U.S. 7th Fleet (C7F), is embarked aboard USS Blue Ridge (LCC 19), forward
deployed to Yokosuka, Japan. The flagship commands and controls the fleet, and fosters
military-to-military relationships through scheduled port visits and military exercises.
U.S. 7th Fleet units take part in as many as 100 bilateral and multilateral exercises each
year. In addition to these exercises, ships deployed to the 7th Fleet conduct more than
250 port visits every year. The presence of the U.S. 7th Fleet helps ensure the security
and stability of this key region
 AT: Operation T changed Navy
None at the time – prefer recent evidence because troop numbers changed
American Foreign Press Service 4/11 (Lisa Daniel, U.S. Military Remains Ready to Help Japan,
http://www.defense.gov/news/newsarticle.aspx?id=63517)

The U.S. military remains ready to help Japan, even as it has repositioned many assets since a
9.0 magnitude earthquake marked a chain of disasters there one month ago, military
officials said. Numerous aftershocks have rocked northeast Japan since the March 11
earthquake, including a 6.6 magnitude aftershock reported today and a 7.1 magnitude
quake reported April 8. The U.S. military has not been called to help with the most-
recent aftershocks, but continues to give support and remains positioned to respond to
requests by the Japanese government, Pentagon spokesman Marine Corps Col. Dave
Lapan told reporters today. “We continue to provide some measure of assistance to
Japan, but certainly not at the level it was at a few weeks ago,” Lapan said. The military
sent some 20,000 troops, 140 aircraft and at least 20 ships in support of Operation
Tomodachi since March 11, according to military officials. While no U.S. ships are directly
supporting Operation Tomodachi today, several are forward deployed to Japan as part of their regular
operations, officials said. About 50,000 U.S. troops are based in Japan. “U.S. forces remain committed to
the government and people of Japan and are positioned for sustained support,” DOD public affairs
officer Navy Cmdr. Leslie Hull-Ryde said. “U.S. military forces throughout Japan
maintain the capability to provide rapid response.” The repositioning of U.S. military
assets “is an indicator of the tremendous progress the Japanese government and the
Japan Self-Defense Forces have made on the ground in dealing with this catastrophe,”
she said. The initial earthquake was followed by a tsunami and a partial meltdown of
some of Japan’s nuclear reactors, as well as multiple aftershocks in the past four weeks.
The U.S. military responded to Japan immediately, with assistance to Japanese forces, as
well as more than 2 million gallons of water, 189 tons of food, 11,960 gallons of fuel and
100 tons of relief supplies, officials said.

Even if they are – they’re temporary. Our definition of presence is “long term”
means that the troops deployed for humanitarian relief efforts in Japan aren’t
presence
 Okinawa (20,000)
There are 20,000 troops on Okinawa
Global Security 10 (Okinawa, Japan,
http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/facility/okinawa.htm)

By 2003 the US was considering moving most of the 20,000 Marines on Okinawa to new bases that
would be established in Australia; increasing the presence of US troops in Singapore and
Malaysia; and seeking agreements to base Navy ships in Vietnamese waters and ground
troops in the Philippines. For the Marines based on Okinawa, most for months without
their families, the US is considering a major shift. Under plans on the table, all but about 5,000 of
the Marines would move, possibly to Australia.

24,000 troops
BBC News 10 (No easy answers in Okinawa US base debate,
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/8574208.stm)

Alongside them are the 12,500 Americans who also perished in the brutal, inch-by-inch
fight for the small, tropical island of coral 1,000 miles south of Tokyo. The United States
has been here ever since, but a peace deal signed 50 years ago was not an equal one,
agreed in the aftermath of war, surrender, then occupation. There are now 24,000 US troops
on Okinawa, most of them marines, and their bases, airfields, housing and training facilities cover a fifth of
the island.

And you use to have 50% - but 8,000 are being removed
Mainchi Daily News 2/18 (Reischauer saw U.S. forces' Okinawa-to-Guam move theoretically
possible,
http://mdn.mainichi.jp/mdnnews/news/20110219p2g00m0dm004000c.html)

Former U.S. Ambassador to Japan Edwin Reischauer told a Japanese government official in 1967
that relocating all U.S. military facilities in Okinawa to Guam was theoretically possible, declassified
Japanese diplomatic documents showed Friday. Reischauer also told the Japanese
officials that the U.S. military had estimated the cost for the relocation at $3 billion to $4
billion, showed the documents declassified by the Japanese Foreign Ministry. Reischauer
made the comment during a meeting with a Japanese diplomat in Boston on April 14,
1967, eight months after leaving the U.S. Embassy in Tokyo, according to a top-secret
cable sent the following day to the Japanese Foreign Ministry from the Japanese
Embassy in Washington. The document quoted Reischauer as saying that Japan had
enjoyed a "free ride" in its national security thanks to U.S. defense efforts, a comment
taken as speaking for some U.S. lawmakers who were dissatisfied with Tokyo and trying
to prod Japan to take a more active role in its national defense. In 2006, Japan and the
United States reached an agreement on the realignment of U.S. forces in Japan. Under the accord, the
U.S. Marine Corps' Futenma Air Station in Ginowan will be relocated to the coastal area of Nago by 2014.
The deal also includes the transfer of around 8,000 Marines to Guam from Okinawa.
 Operation T (15,000)
15,000 – this guy is hella qualled
Swift 3/30 (Rear Admiral Scott, U.S. Pacific Command, Update on Operation Tomodachi,
http://www.nbr.org/downloads/pdfs/ETA/EA_2011_Swift_Remarks.pdf)

Dr. Rich Ellings: I know that perhaps motivating that question have been in--over the
last years and more recent times events precipitated by North Korean actions, not to
mention other things going on in the region. I assume that's the gist of that question.
And thank you so much for responding. Another question out there? Admiral, I have
one, a question. How many total troops, approximately, and sailors do we have that are dedicated to
Tomodachi, both in the region, and I know there at the command you're--you've got a
whole group there. But, how many people are we talking about who are helping out the
Japanese Self-Defense Forces? Rear Admiral Scott Swift: Let me start off with framing
the forces that report for duty every morning to Admiral Willard. There's over 325,000
sailors, soldiers, airmen, marines, and coastguardsmen that are assigned to the Pacific
Command. Now, we support CENTCOM with a portion of those forces. But, again, it
speaks to the depth of capacity that the US military has to apply globally. Specifically to
your question, DOD is supporting Operation Tomodachi with approximately 15,000 personnel. The DOD
service members, when we talk of those that are assigned across the broader region specific to Japan, it's
upwards of 55,000 total. So, there's a significant number that are committed to it. From a
resource perspective, there is the--there is over 22 ships, 140 aircraft that are committed
as well. So, it's a significant force. I think I mentioned earlier two carrier strike groups
and an amphibious ready group committed as well.

18,000
Tokyo Free Press 4/7 (We used to say, "A friend in need is a friend indeed," but this is no
longer true these days, http://www.tokyofreepress.com/article.php?
story=20110407060545974&mode=print)

When the U.S. government offered a massive relief operation involving 18,000 troops, the Japanese
government jumped at it and named it "Operation Tomodachi." To be more precise, it should have
been named Operation Yujo because Yujo means friendship whereas Tomodachi just
means a friend, or friends. Semantics aside, however, most Japanese have really
appreciated the friendship demonstrated by the Americans because they are really fed up
with their government which has constantly mishandled the post-quake situation.
 Operation T (20,000)
20,000
American Foreign Press Service 4/11 (Lisa Daniel, U.S. Military Remains Ready to Help Japan,
http://www.defense.gov/news/newsarticle.aspx?id=63517)

The U.S. military remains ready to help Japan, even as it has repositioned many assets since a
9.0 magnitude earthquake marked a chain of disasters there one month ago, military
officials said. Numerous aftershocks have rocked northeast Japan since the March 11
earthquake, including a 6.6 magnitude aftershock reported today and a 7.1 magnitude
quake reported April 8. The U.S. military has not been called to help with the most-
recent aftershocks, but continues to give support and remains positioned to respond to
requests by the Japanese government, Pentagon spokesman Marine Corps Col. Dave
Lapan told reporters today. “We continue to provide some measure of assistance to
Japan, but certainly not at the level it was at a few weeks ago,” Lapan said. The military sent
some 20,000 troops, 140 aircraft and at least 20 ships in support of Operation Tomodachi since March 11,
according to military officials. While no U.S. ships are directly supporting Operation
Tomodachi today, several are forward deployed to Japan as part of their regular
operations, officials said. About 50,000 U.S. troops are based in Japan. “U.S. forces
remain committed to the government and people of Japan and are positioned for
sustained support,” DOD public affairs officer Navy Cmdr. Leslie Hull-Ryde said. “U.S.
military forces throughout Japan maintain the capability to provide rapid response.” The
repositioning of U.S. military assets “is an indicator of the tremendous progress the
Japanese government and the Japan Self-Defense Forces have made on the ground in
dealing with this catastrophe,” she said. The initial earthquake was followed by a
tsunami and a partial meltdown of some of Japan’s nuclear reactors, as well as multiple
aftershocks in the past four weeks. The U.S. military responded to Japan immediately,
with assistance to Japanese forces, as well as more than 2 million gallons of water, 189
tons of food, 11,960 gallons of fuel and 100 tons of relief supplies, officials said.
 Yokosuka (0)
There are no ships at Yokosuka – they all got evacuated
CNN 3/21 (U.S. military considering mandatory evacuations in Yokosuka,
http://articles.cnn.com/2011-03-21/us/japan.military.evacuation_1_voluntary-
evacuations-defense-official-troops?_s=PM:US)

The U.S. military is considering the mandatory evacuation of thousands of American troops and their
families in Japan out of concern over rising radiation levels, a senior defense official tells CNN. The
official, who did not want to be on the record talking about ongoing deliberations, says
there are no discussions to evacuate all U.S. troops across the country. The talks have
focused exclusively on U.S. troops in Yokosuka, just south of Tokyo, the official said. Yokosuka is
home to America's largest naval base in Japan. The military is monitoring radiation
levels on a constant basis. As of Monday, the U.S. Navy had no more warships in port at the base. The
aircraft carrier USS George Washington, which had been undergoing maintenance in Yokosuka, left port
Monday in order to get away from the plume of radioactive particles that could blow over the base.
Because it left port with a much smaller than normal crew, the George Washington will
not take part in the Japanese relief effort. The official said the talks originated with
Pacific Command, the military authority that directly oversees U.S. troops in the region,
but "discussions have since taken place here in Washington as well." The official told
CNN this is strictly a contingency plan, and could be accomplished "if they needed to do
it in a hurry, with gray tails," or large military transport planes like a C-17. CBS News
first reported that the evacuation were being considered. A second defense official at
Pacific Command, who would not go on the record for the same reason, would only say
they "are monitoring the situation, and will continue to do so and keep our families
informed. Prudent planning always happens." An official statement released by U.S.
Pacific Command, which oversees all military operations in Asia, states that the only
evacuations being performed now are under State Department guidelines, which calls for
voluntary evacuations of military family members, paid for by the U.S. government. A
flight carrying 154 military family members left Japan Monday, flying into
Seattle/Tacoma International Airport, according to Lt. Commander Bill Lewis, a
spokesman for U.S. Northern Command. That followed a flight that departed Saturday
with 230 people on board.

Their ships aren’t in dock; why they’re considering getting paid extra
Stars and Stripes 4/5 (Servicemembers aboard ships won’t get extra hardship pay,
http://www.stripes.com/news/pacific/earthquake-disaster-in-japan/servicemembers-
aboard-ships-won-t-get-extra-hardship-pay-1.140041)

Defense Department policy only allows land areas to be designated as a hardship

location, said Eileen Lainez, spokeswoman for the Office of the Secretary of Defense.
“Career sea pay is paid to members for enduring similar hardships … and is intended to recognize the
greater than normal rigors of sea duty,” Lainez said. Sea pay varies but begins at $50 per month
and increases to hundreds of dollars per month based on rank and experience, according
to military pay charts. If a sailor or Marine is assigned to a ship at Yokosuka Naval Base – which is in a
hardship area – those servicemembers will not receive hardship pay, even when their ships return to the
base. Ship-based servicemembers will only receive the hardship pay if they receive
temporary orders to a shore command for at least 30 days, defense officials said. Federal
civilian employees will earn an extra 10 percent of their base pay for working in the same
areas. For example, a consular officer earning $60,000 per year in base pay will earn an
extra $500 per month for as long as the 18 prefectures are deemed hardship locations.
The hardship allowance will remain in effect until the end of the State Department’s
authorized departure program, according to a State Department memo. Some sailors
who spoke with Stars and Stripes on Tuesday said they thought the hardship pay was a
waste of money, especially given the military’s current budget shortfalls. Congress’
inability to pass a permanent 2011 federal budget bill has left billion-dollar holes in the
Navy’s budget, forcing it to delay orders and cancel ship maintenance projects, according
to congressional testimony.
***Cash
 All Bases ($6 Billion)
The US pays 6 billion dollar for troops in Japan
AP 10 (Japan balks at $2 billion to host U.S. troops,
http://www.marinecorpstimes.com/news/2010/02/ap_military_japan_020710/)

GINOWAN, Japan — In a country where land is a precious commodity, many U.S. bases
in Japan boast golf courses, football fields and giant shopping malls whose food courts
offer everything from Taco Bell to Subway and Starbucks. They are the most visible point of
grievance in a sharpening debate about the cost to Japan of supporting the 47,000 American service
members here — about $2 billion a year. That's nearly a third of the total, and about three times what
Germany pays to host U.S. forces on its soil.
 Arm Sales (~7 billion)

The Japanese Government only spent 1.1 billion on defense

Kawasaki 09 (Akira, Member of Peace and Collaborative Development Network, ASIAN
PERSPECTIVE, Vol. 33, No. 4, 2009, pp. 129-146,
http://www.asianperspective.org/articles/v33n4-f.pdf)

The breakdown of equipment purchases comes to $1.6 billion for aircraft, $1.9 billion for ships, $1 billion for
missiles, $1.1 billion for firearms and vehicles, and $1.2 billion for ammunition. Particular importance
has been placed on the modernization of the Air Self-Defense Force’s F-15 fighter planes
and the upgrade of warning and surveillance radars. In addition, the government
allocated around $1.1 billion for “dealing with ballistic missile attacks” and around $600
million toward “efforts for development and use of space” for the purpose of “enhancing
operational infrastructure” of the ballistic missile defense (BMD) system.6 The
breakdown of equipment purchases comes to $1.6 billion for aircraft, $1.9 billion for
ships, $1 billion for missiles, $1.1 billion for firearms and vehicles, and $1.2 billion for
ammunition. Particular importance has been placed on the modernization of the Air
Self-Defense Force’s F-15 fighter planes and the upgrade of warning and surveillance
radars. In addition, the government allocated around $1.1 billion for “dealing with
ballistic missile attacks” and around $600 million toward “efforts for development and
use of space” for the purpose of “enhancing operational infrastructure” of the ballistic
missile defense (BMD) system.6

7 billion
CRS 10 (Richard F. Grimmett, Specialist in International Security, U.S. Arms Sales:
Agreements with and Deliveries to Major Clients, 2002-2009,
http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/weapons/R41539.pdf - Note: Columns were lost when I cut
the cards – just add up all the totals for one country)

Table 3. Leading Purchasers of U.S. Defense Articles and Services, Total Values of Asia
Agreements Concluded (in current U.S. dollars, rounded to nearest 10 million or 10th of
a billion) Asia Agreements 2002-2005 Asia Agreements 2006-2009 Asia Agreements
2009 1 South Korea $2.9 billion 1 Australia $7.1billion 1 Taiwan $3.8 billion 2 Japan $2.5
billion 2 Taiwan $5.7 billion 2 Australia $1.1 billion 3 Australia $1.3 billion 3 South Korea
$3.5 billion 3 South Korea $750 million 4 Taiwan $1.1 billion 4 Japan $3.1 billion 4 Japan
$730 million 5 Singapore $900 million 5 Singapore $1.1 billion 5 Singapore $210 million
 BMD (31.9 million)
BMD research project with Japan is at most 31.9 million
CRS 02 (Richard P. Cronin, Specialist in Asian Affairs Foreign Affairs, Defense, and Trade
Division, “Japan-U.S. Cooperation on
Ballistic Missile Defense: Issues and Prospects,” March 19, 2002, CRS Report for
Congress, http://fpc.state.gov/documents/organization/9186.pdf

For fiscal year 2002, which begins April 1, 2002, the Japanese Diet has appropriated about 6.9
billion yen ($53.1 million at ¥ 130/US $1) for design and trial manufacturing activities. Because of
changes in the trial manufacturing program and budgetary constraints, the Japanese Defense Agency
(JDA) request was cut by ¥ 1.3, or about $100,000.25 U.S. Department of Defense spending
specifically for the Japan/U.S. Cooperative BMD Research Project program element will total $37.6
million in FY2002. For FY2003, the Defense Department has requested $31.9 million for the same
program element.
 BMD (Japan – $1.1 billion)

The Japanese Government only spent 1.1 billion on defense

Kawasaki 09 (Akira, Member of Peace and Collaborative Development Network, ASIAN
PERSPECTIVE, Vol. 33, No. 4, 2009, pp. 129-146,
http://www.asianperspective.org/articles/v33n4-f.pdf)

The breakdown of equipment purchases comes to $1.6 billion for aircraft, $1.9 billion for
ships, $1 billion for missiles, $1.1 billion for firearms and vehicles, and $1.2 billion for
ammunition. Particular importance has been placed on the modernization of the Air
Self-Defense Force’s F-15 fighter planes and the upgrade of warning and surveillance
radars. In addition, the government allocated around $1.1 billion for “dealing with ballistic missile
attacks” and around $600 million toward “efforts for development and use of space” for the purpose of
“enhancing operational infrastructure” of the ballistic missile defense (BMD) system.6 The breakdown of
equipment purchases comes to $1.6 billion for aircraft, $1.9 billion for ships, $1 billion
for missiles, $1.1 billion for firearms and vehicles, and $1.2 billion for ammunition.
Particular importance has been placed on the modernization of the Air Self-Defense
Force’s F-15 fighter planes and the upgrade of warning and surveillance radars. In
addition, the government allocated around $1.1 billion for “dealing with ballistic missile
attacks” and around $600 million toward “efforts for development and use of space” for
the purpose of “enhancing operational infrastructure” of the ballistic missile defense
(BMD) system.6
 Kadena (6 billion)
Kadena Air Base 08 (Kadena Air Base, http://www.kadena.af.mil/main/welcome.asp)

Operating from the largest U.S. installation in the Asia-Pacific region, the 18th Wing defends U.S. and
Japanese mutual interests by providing aforward power projection platform with integrated,
deployable, combat power. The Wing operates a fleet of 81 combat-ready aircraft to
perform air superiority, aerial refueling, airborne warning and control, and combat
search and rescue functions. In addition, a force of 8,000 trained Airmen is postured to
support Air Force commitments in the Pacific region as well as U.S. military
commitments around the world. The 18th Wing is responsible for 54 F-15s, 15 KC-135s, 2 E-3s and
10 HH-60s valued at more than $4 billion, as well as other equipment and capital assets valued at nearly $2
billion. The base also provides infrastructure support to Army, Navy and Marine Corps
forces assigned to or transiting Kadena. Team Kadena includes associate units from five
other Air Force major commands, the U.S. Navy, and numerous other Department of
Defense agencies and direct reporting units. In addition to the 81 aircraft of the 18th
Wing, associate units operate more than 20 permanently assigned, forward-based or
deployed aircraft from Kadena on a daily basis.
***Bases
 All (50+)
There are over 50 bases in Japan
Close the Bases 10 (John Feffer, Grassroots network that draws together representatives
from peace groups, http://closethebase.org/)

Air Force:

• Camp Chitose, Chitose, Hokkaido

• Kadena Air Base, Okinawa Prefecture
• Kadena Ammunition Storage Area, Okinawa Prefecture
• Misawa Air Base, Aomori Prefecture
• Yokota Air Base, Fussa, Tokyo
• Fuchu Communications Station, Fuchu, Tokyo
• Tama Service Annex, Inagi, Tokyo
• Yugi Communication Site, Hachioji, Tokyo
• Camp Asaka AFN Transmitter Site, Saitama Prefecture
• Tokorozawa Transmitter Site, Saitama Prefecture
• Owada Communication Site, Saitama Prefecture
• Okuma Rest Center, Okinawa Prefecture
• Yaedake Communication Site, Okinawa Prefecture
• Senaha Communication Station, Okinawa Prefecture

Army:

• Fort Buckner, Okinawa Prefecture

• Camp Zama, Zama, Kanagawa
• Yokohama North Dock, Yokohama, Kanagawa Prefecture
• Sagami General Depot, Sagamihara, Kanagawa
• Sagamihara Housing Area, Sagamihara, Kanagawa
• Akizuki Ammunition Depot, Hiroshima Prefecture
• Hiro Ammunition Depot, Hiroshima Prefecture
• Kawakami Ammunition Depot, Hiroshima Prefecture
• Gesaji Communication Site, Okinawa Prefecture
• Army POL Depots, Okinawa Prefecture
• White Beach Area, Okinawa Prefecture
• Naha Port, Okinawa Prefecture
• Hardy Barracks, Roppongi, Tokyo
• Torii Station, Yomitan, Okinawa Prefecture, Japan

Marine Corps:

• Camp Smedley D. Butler, Okinawa, Yamaguchi Prefectures. Although these camps are
dispersed throughout Okinawa and Japan they are all under the heading of Camp
Smedley D. Butler):
• Camp McTureous
• Camp Courtney
• Camp Kinser
• Camp Hansen
• Camp Schwab
• Camp Shields
• Camp Gonsalves (Jungle Warfare Training Center)
• Kin Blue Beach Training Area
• Kin Red Beach Training Area
• NSGA Hanza
• Higashionna Ammunition Storage Point II
• Henoko Ordnance Ammunition Depot
• Camp Foster, Okinawa Prefecture
• Camp Lester, Okinawa Prefecture
• Marine Corps Air Station Futenma
• Yomitan Auxiliary Airfield
• Marine Corps Air Station Iwakuni
• Camp Fuji, Shizuoka Prefecture
• Numazu Training Area, Shizuoka Prefecture
• Tengan Pier
• Ie Jima Auxiliary Air Field, Okinawa Prefecture
• Tsuken Jima Training Area
• Kadena Ammunition Storage Area

Navy:

• Naval Air Facility Atsugi, Ayase, Kanagawa

• United States Fleet Activities Sasebo, Sasebo, Nagasaki
• United States Fleet Activities Yokosuka, Yokosuka, Kanagawa
• Urago Ammunition Depot, Yokosuka, Kanagawa Prefecture
• Tsurumi POL Depot, Yokohama, Kanagawa Prefecture
• Naval Housing Annex Negishi, Yokohama, Kanagawa Prefecture
• Naval Transmitter Station Totsuka, Yokohama, Kanagawa Prefecture
• Naval Support Facility Kamiseya, Yokohama, Kanagawa Prefecture
• Tomioka Storage Area, Yokohama, Kanagawa Prefecture
• Naval Housing Annex Ikego, Zushi, Kanagawa
• White Beach Area, Okinawa Prefecture
• Awase Communication Station, Okinawa Prefecture
• Sobe Communication Site, Okinawa Prefecture
• New Sanno Hotel, Tokyo
 Okinawa (17)
There are over 17 bases in Okinawa
Close the Bases 10 (John Feffer, Grassroots network that draws together representatives
from peace groups, http://closethebase.org/)

Air Force:

• Camp Chitose, Chitose, Hokkaido

• Kadena Air Base, Okinawa Prefecture
• Kadena Ammunition Storage Area, Okinawa Prefecture
• Misawa Air Base, Aomori Prefecture
• Yokota Air Base, Fussa, Tokyo
• Fuchu Communications Station, Fuchu, Tokyo
• Tama Service Annex, Inagi, Tokyo
• Yugi Communication Site, Hachioji, Tokyo
• Camp Asaka AFN Transmitter Site, Saitama Prefecture
• Tokorozawa Transmitter Site, Saitama Prefecture
• Owada Communication Site, Saitama Prefecture
• Okuma Rest Center, Okinawa Prefecture
• Yaedake Communication Site, Okinawa Prefecture
• Senaha Communication Station, Okinawa Prefecture

Army:

• Fort Buckner, Okinawa Prefecture

• Camp Zama, Zama, Kanagawa
• Yokohama North Dock, Yokohama, Kanagawa Prefecture
• Sagami General Depot, Sagamihara, Kanagawa
• Sagamihara Housing Area, Sagamihara, Kanagawa
• Akizuki Ammunition Depot, Hiroshima Prefecture
• Hiro Ammunition Depot, Hiroshima Prefecture
• Kawakami Ammunition Depot, Hiroshima Prefecture
• Gesaji Communication Site, Okinawa Prefecture
• Army POL Depots, Okinawa Prefecture
• White Beach Area, Okinawa Prefecture
• Naha Port, Okinawa Prefecture
• Hardy Barracks, Roppongi, Tokyo
• Torii Station, Yomitan, Okinawa Prefecture, Japan

Marine Corps:

• Camp Smedley D. Butler, Okinawa, Yamaguchi Prefectures. Although these camps are
dispersed throughout Okinawa and Japan they are all under the heading of Camp
Smedley D. Butler):
• Camp McTureous
• Camp Courtney
• Camp Kinser
• Camp Hansen
• Camp Schwab
• Camp Shields
• Camp Gonsalves (Jungle Warfare Training Center)
• Kin Blue Beach Training Area
• Kin Red Beach Training Area
• NSGA Hanza
• Higashionna Ammunition Storage Point II
• Henoko Ordnance Ammunition Depot
• Camp Foster, Okinawa Prefecture
• Camp Lester, Okinawa Prefecture
• Marine Corps Air Station Futenma
• Yomitan Auxiliary Airfield
• Marine Corps Air Station Iwakuni
• Camp Fuji, Shizuoka Prefecture
• Numazu Training Area, Shizuoka Prefecture
• Tengan Pier
• Ie Jima Auxiliary Air Field, Okinawa Prefecture
• Tsuken Jima Training Area
• Kadena Ammunition Storage Area

Navy:

• Naval Air Facility Atsugi, Ayase, Kanagawa

• United States Fleet Activities Sasebo, Sasebo, Nagasaki
• United States Fleet Activities Yokosuka, Yokosuka, Kanagawa
• Urago Ammunition Depot, Yokosuka, Kanagawa Prefecture
• Tsurumi POL Depot, Yokohama, Kanagawa Prefecture
• Naval Housing Annex Negishi, Yokohama, Kanagawa Prefecture
• Naval Transmitter Station Totsuka, Yokohama, Kanagawa Prefecture
• Naval Support Facility Kamiseya, Yokohama, Kanagawa Prefecture
• Tomioka Storage Area, Yokohama, Kanagawa Prefecture
• Naval Housing Annex Ikego, Zushi, Kanagawa
• White Beach Area, Okinawa Prefecture
• Awase Communication Station, Okinawa Prefecture
• Sobe Communication Site, Okinawa Prefecture
• New Sanno Hotel, Tokyo
 Tokyo (Bases)
There are over 6 bases in Tokyo
Close the Bases 10 (John Feffer, Grassroots network that draws together representatives
from peace groups, http://closethebase.org/)

Air Force:

• Camp Chitose, Chitose, Hokkaido

• Kadena Air Base, Okinawa Prefecture
• Kadena Ammunition Storage Area, Okinawa Prefecture
• Misawa Air Base, Aomori Prefecture
• Yokota Air Base, Fussa, Tokyo
• Fuchu Communications Station, Fuchu, Tokyo
• Tama Service Annex, Inagi, Tokyo
• Yugi Communication Site, Hachioji, Tokyo
• Camp Asaka AFN Transmitter Site, Saitama Prefecture
• Tokorozawa Transmitter Site, Saitama Prefecture
• Owada Communication Site, Saitama Prefecture
• Okuma Rest Center, Okinawa Prefecture
• Yaedake Communication Site, Okinawa Prefecture
• Senaha Communication Station, Okinawa Prefecture

Army:

• Fort Buckner, Okinawa Prefecture

• Camp Zama, Zama, Kanagawa
• Yokohama North Dock, Yokohama, Kanagawa Prefecture
• Sagami General Depot, Sagamihara, Kanagawa
• Sagamihara Housing Area, Sagamihara, Kanagawa
• Akizuki Ammunition Depot, Hiroshima Prefecture
• Hiro Ammunition Depot, Hiroshima Prefecture
• Kawakami Ammunition Depot, Hiroshima Prefecture
• Gesaji Communication Site, Okinawa Prefecture
• Army POL Depots, Okinawa Prefecture
• White Beach Area, Okinawa Prefecture
• Naha Port, Okinawa Prefecture
• Hardy Barracks, Roppongi, Tokyo
• Torii Station, Yomitan, Okinawa Prefecture, Japan

Marine Corps:

• Camp Smedley D. Butler, Okinawa, Yamaguchi Prefectures. Although these camps are
dispersed throughout Okinawa and Japan they are all under the heading of Camp
Smedley D. Butler):
• Camp McTureous
• Camp Courtney
• Camp Kinser
• Camp Hansen
• Camp Schwab
• Camp Shields
• Camp Gonsalves (Jungle Warfare Training Center)
• Kin Blue Beach Training Area
• Kin Red Beach Training Area
• NSGA Hanza
• Higashionna Ammunition Storage Point II
• Henoko Ordnance Ammunition Depot
• Camp Foster, Okinawa Prefecture
• Camp Lester, Okinawa Prefecture
• Marine Corps Air Station Futenma
• Yomitan Auxiliary Airfield
• Marine Corps Air Station Iwakuni
• Camp Fuji, Shizuoka Prefecture
• Numazu Training Area, Shizuoka Prefecture
• Tengan Pier
• Ie Jima Auxiliary Air Field, Okinawa Prefecture
• Tsuken Jima Training Area
• Kadena Ammunition Storage Area

Navy:

• Naval Air Facility Atsugi, Ayase, Kanagawa

• United States Fleet Activities Sasebo, Sasebo, Nagasaki
• United States Fleet Activities Yokosuka, Yokosuka, Kanagawa
• Urago Ammunition Depot, Yokosuka, Kanagawa Prefecture
• Tsurumi POL Depot, Yokohama, Kanagawa Prefecture
• Naval Housing Annex Negishi, Yokohama, Kanagawa Prefecture
• Naval Transmitter Station Totsuka, Yokohama, Kanagawa Prefecture
• Naval Support Facility Kamiseya, Yokohama, Kanagawa Prefecture
• Tomioka Storage Area, Yokohama, Kanagawa Prefecture
• Naval Housing Annex Ikego, Zushi, Kanagawa
• White Beach Area, Okinawa Prefecture
• Awase Communication Station, Okinawa Prefecture
• Sobe Communication Site, Okinawa Prefecture
• New Sanno Hotel, Tokyo
** Korea Limits
 All (28,500)
28,500 US troops in South Korea now.
US Department of State 10 (Bureau of East Asian and Pacific Affairs, “South Korea”,
May 28th, http://www.state.gov/r/pa/ei/bgn/2800.htm)

Several aspects of the U.S.-R.O.K. security relationship are changing as the U.S. moves
from a leading to a supporting role. In 2004 an agreement was reached on the return of
the Yongsan base in Seoul--as well as a number of other U.S. bases--to the R.O.K. and
the eventual relocation of all U.S. forces to south of the Han River. Those movements are
expected to be completed by 2016. In addition, the U.S. and R.O.K. agreed to reduce the number
of U.S. troops in Korea to 25,000 by 2008, but a subsequent agreement by the U.S. and R.O.K. presidents
in 2008 has now capped that number at 28,500, with no further troop reductions planned. The
U.S. and R.O.K. have also agreed to transfer wartime operational control to the R.O.K.
military on April 17, 2012.

And we have 28,500 troops – confirmed by our agreement with South Korea
Gates 08 (Defense Secretary, Robert, http://www.america.gov/st/texttrans-
english/2008/October/20081020121847eaifas0.7119104.html)

We have -- one of the things that I did this morning was commit again to Minister Lee
what President Bush committed during their summit meeting at Camp David, and that
as -- and that is that U.S. force levels in Korea will remain at the level at that time, which is
28,500.
 Air Force (8,300)
Airforce has 8,300 personnel
Global Security 04 (US Forces Order of Battle,
http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/ops/korea-orbat.htm)

The Air Force had two wings located in the USFK region with some 8,300 personnel, operating
a total of about 100 aircraft of all types.
 DMZ (0)
There are no troops in the Demilitarized Zone
China Daily 03 (US pulling troops away from Korean DMZ,
http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/en/doc/2003-06/06/content_168113.htm)

In a historic move after a half-century, the United States will pull its ground troops away from the
Demilitarized Zone separating North and South Korea and consolidate them at bases well to the south. The
realignment, announced in a joint US-South Korean statement Thursday, has been in the
works for months. It reflects US Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld's push to break a Cold War
mold of assumptions about the usefulness of having troops along the tense DMZ. The moves in Korea
are part of a broader Pentagon strategy to realign US forces around the globe, to include
likely reductions in Germany and the establishment of new bases in eastern Europe. Last
month the United States pulled its troops out of Saudi Arabia after a 12-year stay. But
also, residents have complained that the sprawling 8th US Army headquarters in
downtown Seoul occupies prime real estate and worsens the city's chronic traffic
congestion. Younger generations of South Koreans see the foreign military presence in
their capital as a slight to national pride. When US President Bush and Roh met in May,
they agreed that South Korea's growing economic strength allows the country to play a
bigger military role in defending itself. In Rumsfeld's view, moving US troops away from
the DMZ and consolidating them at perhaps two main "hub" bases south of Seoul will
create a more formidable fighting force. It will not remove the troops from danger, and
in Rumsfeld's view it does not weaken the US deterrent at a time when North Korea is
openly pursuing an expanded nuclear arsenal. The United States has assured South
Korea it will spend more than $11 billion over the next four years on 150 improvements
in the combined US-South Korean defenses. No details were provided. The new
arrangement will end a US troop presence on the DMZ that dates to the end of the 1950-
53 Korean War, when a 151-mile buffer zone was established along the approximate line
of ground contact between the opposing forces at the time a July 27, 1953, truce was
signed. In a two-phase movement, US troops at bases scattered near the DMZ will be moved to "hub
bases" at least 75 miles south of the Demilitarized Zone, according to the joint statement.

More evidence
Time 03 (South Korea: Run DMZ,
http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,457403,00.html)

It's an enduring relic of the cold war: more than 15,000 U.S. troops stationed just south of the Korean
peninsula's Demilitarized Zone well within range of North Korean artillery. But the trip wire the boots-
on-the-ground guarantee that an attack on South Korea would automatically bring U.S.
intervention may soon be gone. Last week, Seoul and Washington announced U.S. troops will pull
back at least 50 km to bases south of Seoul over the next few years. It makes military sense a few thousand
grunts were never going to block an invasion by the 1.1 million-strong North Korean military. And in an
era of precision-guided munitions, officials insist the pullback won't undermine the U.S.-
South Korean defense alliance or send the wrong signal to Pyongyang. Says Lieut.
Colonel Steven Boylan, a spokesman for U.S. forces in South Korea: "Everything we are
doing is to enhance the alliance, not diminish it." With anti-American sentiment still
strong in South Korea, the U.S. decision might seem like a boon to President Roh Moo
Hyun; in his younger days, he supported the withdrawal of American troops. No danger
of that here: the move comes with a $11 billion investment to bolster U.S. defenses on the
peninsula.
 Ground Force (22,500)
There are 22,500 ground forces
Global Security 04 (US Forces Order of Battle,
http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/ops/korea-orbat.htm)

Ground forces included a variety of units that were normally deployed in the region.
Forces in the region include Patriot missile batteries, Apache helicopter squadrons, a
mechanized infantry brigade, an air assault brigade, various support, intelligence and
other units. Prior to 2004 the total Army presence in the region was nearly 27,500
soldiers, of which 13,753 were assigned to the 2nd Infantry Division. However, it is
important to point out that the Department of Defense indicated during a briefing on
July 23, 2003 that the United States Army had some 4,000 additional soldiers in South
Korea than what had been previously disclosed by the military. It was not clear is this is a
mistake or not. If true, this would have brought the total number of soldiers in South
Korea to 31,460. In any event, with the 2nd Brigade Combat Team going to Iraq in August 2004, the
total number of troops declined by 5,000, to a total of 22,500 Army soldiers
 Naval Forces (293)
There are 293 sailors permanently based in South Korea
Global Security 04 (US Forces Order of Battle,
http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/ops/korea-orbat.htm)

US Naval Forces, Korea is particularly small, numbering around 293 sailors and 52 marines. CNFK
normally has no seagoing forces assigned, though its personnel are assigned to various joint,
combined, and Navy billets throughout the ROK peninsula. These personnel are actively
engaged in planning and execution of numerous operations and exercises throughout the
Korean theater. There is one ship that has been present in the region for over 30 years, that being the
USS Pueblo which was captured on 23 January 1968. She is currently located at
Pyongyang
 AT Ships!
Troops in Korea serve as a liason to the 7th fleet – which is based in Yokosuka
CNFK No Date (About CNFK, https://www.cnic.navy.mil/Korea/AboutCNIC/index.htm)

CNFK is the regional commander for the U.S. Navy in the Republic of Korea and provides leadership and
expertise in naval matters to area military commanders, including the Commander for the United
Nations Command, the Republic of Korea and U.S. Combined Forces Command, and
Commander, U.S. Forces Korea. CNFK also serves as liaison to the Republic of Korea Navy, the
Combined Forces Commander staff in armistice and in wartime and to the Commander,
U.S. 7th Fleet, based in Yokosuka.

Look we shouldn’t need cards for this – there are no actual ships based in
Korea. The fact that the USS George Washington had to come up to Korea to
project power is a reason why there is no possibility for engagement

And even if they win we might have a few ships, Yokosuka is the only thing
West of Hawaii that could actually maintain a fleet
Yoshihara 10 (Toshi, Associate professor in the Strategy and Policy Department at the
Naval War College., “CHINESE MISSILE STRATEGY AND THE U.S. NAVAL
PRESENCE IN JAPAN”, NAVAL WAR COLLEGE, accessed 10/1/10)

The indispensability of the ship-repair and maintenance facilities at Yokosuka emerges as another
common theme in the Chinese literature. Analysts in China often note that Yokosuka is the
only base west of Hawaii that possesses the wherewithal to handle major carrier repairs. Some have
concluded that Yokosuka is irreplaceable as long as alternative sites for a large repair station remain
unavailable. Li Daguang, a professor at China’s National Defense University and a frequent
commentator on naval affairs, casts doubt on Guam as a potential candidate, observing
that the island lacks the basic infrastructure and economies of scale to service carriers. 27 China’s
Jianchuan Zhishi (Naval and Merchant Ships) published a translated article from a
Japanese military journal, Gunji Kenkyu (Japan Military Review), to illustrate the physical
limits of Guam as a permanent home port for carriers. 28

We only have one carrier and it’s based in Yokosuka – removing it would
destroy capabilities because of lag time between missions
Eaglan 08 (Mackenzie, Senior Policy Analyst for National Security, Aircraft Carriers Are
Crucial, http://heritage.org/Research/Commentary/2008/08/Aircraft-Carriers-Are-
Crucial)

The Navy also should look to homeport additional carriers in either Hawaii or Guam. For
the past decade the only carrier home-ported outside the continental United States has been the Kitty
Hawk in Yokosuka, Japan. From California, it can take two weeks for a carrier strike group to travel to East
Asia and three weeks to reach the Persian Gulf. Shaving off this time by positioning a carrier in
Guam, for example, would allow ships to respond more quickly to unforeseen crises. It's
time to give aircraft carriers their due. They're not weapons platforms from a bygone era,
but rather flexible tools of national security that can offer a vast array of capabilities.
Congress was correct to stop the Navy from reducing the carrier fleet below the already-
low level of 11 carriers. Now it must be prepared to back up its foresightedness by
funding whichever option the Navy determines best for managing the looming
Enterprise/Ford shortfall. When the question is, "where are the carriers?" we need to
ensure the answer is, "plentiful, and ready to serve."