0% found this document useful (0 votes)
39 views10 pages

Armare grinda principala: f f f f T f f f L h λ h H b μ

1. The document provides details for reinforcing a main column, including material properties, dimensions, loads, and calculations. 2. It determines the effective width, calculates required reinforcement for the column web and marginal and central ties, and verifies shear capacity. 3. Anchor lengths are also calculated for the ties to ensure adequate development length.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
39 views10 pages

Armare grinda principala: f f f f T f f f L h λ h H b μ

1. The document provides details for reinforcing a main column, including material properties, dimensions, loads, and calculations. 2. It determines the effective width, calculates required reinforcement for the column web and marginal and central ties, and verifies shear capacity. 3. Anchor lengths are also calculated for the ties to ensure adequate development length.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 10

Armare grinda principala

1. Date generale:
N fyk N
fyk ≔ 355 ―― fyd ≔ ―― = 308.696 ―― fctm ≔ 2.6 MPa
mm 2 1.15 mm 2
fck T ≔ 10.5 m
N N
fck ≔ 25 ―― fcd ≔ ―― = 16.667 ――
mm 2 1.5 mm 2 L ≔ 7.5 m

hGP ≔ 1200 mm λ ≔ 0.8 hf ≔ 8 cm H≔4 m

bGP ≔ 600 mm μlim ≔ 0.372

2. Determinarea latimii efective in camp a grinzii principale:

b1 ≔ 0.5 ⋅ ⎛⎝T − bGP⎞⎠ = 4.95 m


bGP bGP
L0 ≔ T − ―― − ―― = 9.9 m
2 2
beff1.2 ≔ 0.2 ⋅ b1 + 0.1 ⋅ L0 = 1.98 m

beff ≔ min ⎛⎝beff1.2 ⋅ 2 + bGP , b1 ⋅ 2 + bGP , L0⎞⎠ = 4.56 m


beff.GP
beff.GP ≔ 4.6 m ――― >5=1
bGP
Med.camp ≔ 2226.32 kN ⋅ m

ϕsl ≔ 25 mm

cnom ≔ 35 mm ϕ
sl
d ≔ hGP − cnom − ― = 1.153 m
2
Med.camp
μ ≔ ―――― = 0.168
bGP ⋅ d 2 ⋅ fcd

η≔1
beff.GP hf ⎛ hf ⎞
μ < η ⋅ ――― ⋅ ―⋅ ⎜1 − 0.5 ⋅ ―⎟ = 1 Axa neutra se afla in placa
bGP d ⎝ d⎠
3.1 Armarea in camp:

Med.camp ≔ 2226.32 kN ⋅ m

beff.GP ≔ 4.5 m

d = 1.153 m
Med.camp
μ ≔ ――――― = 0.022 μ < μlim = 1
beff.GP ⋅ d 2 ⋅ fcd

ω ≔ 1 − ‾‾‾‾‾‾
1 − 2 ⋅ μ = 0.023
fcd
As.camp ≔ ω ⋅ beff.GP ⋅ d ⋅ ―― = 63.293 cm 2 Aleg 8 ϕ 32 cu Asl.camp ≔ 64.32 cm 2
fyd
3.2 Armarea reazamului marginal:

Med.r1 ≔ 701.61 kN ⋅ m
Med.r1
μ ≔ ―――― = 0.053 μ < μlim = 1
bGP ⋅ d 2 ⋅ fcd
fctm
As.min1 ≔ 0.26 ⋅ ―― ⋅ bGP ⋅ d = 0.001 m 2
ω ≔ 1 − ‾‾‾‾‾‾
1 − 2 ⋅ μ = 0.054 fyk
fcd
As.r1 ≔ ω ⋅ bGP ⋅ d ⋅ ―― = 20.271 cm 2 0.013 ⋅ bGP ⋅ d = 0.009 m 2
fyd
Aleg 2 ϕ 36 cu Asl.r1 ≔ 20.40 cm 2
3.3 Armarea reazamului central:

Med.r2 ≔ 2837.86 kN ⋅ m

ϕsl ≔ 36 mm

cnom ≔ 35 mm
28
d ≔ hGP − cnom − ― mm = 1.151 m
2
Med.r2
μ ≔ ―――― = 0.214 μ < μlim = 1
bGP ⋅ d 2 ⋅ fcd

ω ≔ 1 − ‾‾‾‾‾‾
1 − 2 ⋅ μ = 0.244
fcd
As.r2 ≔ ω ⋅ bGP ⋅ d ⋅ ―― = 90.967 cm 2 Aleg 9 ϕ 36 Asl.r2 ≔ 91.80 cm 2
fyd
fctm
As.min2 ≔ 0.26 ⋅ ―― ⋅ bGP ⋅ d = 13.151 cm 2 0.013 ⋅ bGP ⋅ d = 0.009 m 2
fyk

4 A l f t t i t
4. Armarea la forta taietoare:

4.1 Reazemul marginal:

Ved.A ≔ 1263.44 kN Asl.r1 ≔ 20.40 cm 2


0.18 N fyk N
CRdc ≔ ―――― = ⎛⎝1.2 ⋅ 10 5 ⎞⎠ Pa fywd ≔ ―― = 308.696 ――
1.5 mm 2
1.15 mm 2
k1 ≔ 0.15 fck ≔ 25
N
σcp ≔ 0 ――
mm 2
‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾
200 mm
k≔1+ ―――= 1.417 k≤2=1
d
Asl.r1
ρl ≔ ――― = 0.003 ρl < 0.02 = 1
bGP ⋅ d

⎛ ―⎞
1
⎜ 3⎟
Vrd.c ≔ ⎝⎛⎝k1 ⋅ σcp⎞⎠ + CRdc ⋅ 1 ⋅ k ⋅ ⎛⎝100 ⋅ ρl ⋅ fck⎞⎠ ⎠ ⋅ bGP ⋅ d = 228.654 kN

⎛ fck ⎞
ν1 ≔ 0.6 ⋅ ⎜1 − ―― ⎟ = 0.525
⎝ 200 ⎠
⎛⎝1 ⋅ bGP ⋅ 0.9 ⋅ d ⋅ ν1 ⋅ fcd⎞⎠
VRd.max ≔ ―――――――= ⎛⎝1.875 ⋅ 10 3 ⎞⎠ kN
2.5 + 0.4

⎛ ⎛⎝⎛⎝Ved.A − Vrd.c⎞⎠ ⋅ 1.5⎞⎠ ⎞


ctθ1 ≔ 2.5 − ⎜――――――― ⎟ = 1.557
⎝ VRd.max − Vrd.c ⎠
ctθ1
s ≔ 0.9 ⋅ d ⋅ fywd ⋅ 226 ⋅ mm 2 ⋅ ――= 89.084 mm
Ved.A
Aleg etr.: ϕ12 /200:
⎛⎝226 ⋅ mm 2 ⎞⎠
VRd.s ≔ ――――⋅ 0.9 ⋅ d ⋅ fywd ⋅ ctθ1 = 562.761 kN
200 mm
VRd.s ≤ VRd.max = 1 ar ≔ 0.5 ⋅ 0.929 m ⋅ ctθ1 = 0.723 m

5.2 Reazemul central:

Ved.B ≔ 1665.24 kN Asl.r2 ≔ 91.80 cm 2


d 1 151
d = 1.151 m
0.18 N fyk N
CRdc ≔ ―――― = ⎛⎝1.2 ⋅ 10 5 ⎞⎠ Pa fywd ≔ ―― = 308.696 ――
1.5 mm 2
1.15 mm 2
k1 ≔ 0.15 fck ≔ 25
N
σcp ≔ 0 ――
mm 2
‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾
200 mm
k≔1+ ―――= 1.417 k≤2=1
d
Asl.r2
ρl ≔ ――― = 0.013 ρl < 0.02 = 1
bGP ⋅ d

⎛ ―⎞
1
⎜ 3⎟
Vrd.c ≔ ⎝⎛⎝k1 ⋅ σcp⎞⎠ + CRdc ⋅ 1 ⋅ k ⋅ ⎛⎝100 ⋅ ρl ⋅ fck⎞⎠ ⎠ ⋅ bGP ⋅ d = 377.499 kN

⎛ fck ⎞
ν1 ≔ 0.6 ⋅ ⎜1 − ―― ⎟ = 0.525
⎝ 200 ⎠
⎛⎝1 ⋅ bGP ⋅ 0.9 ⋅ d ⋅ ν1 ⋅ fcd⎞⎠
VRd.max ≔ ―――――――= ⎛⎝1.875 ⋅ 10 3 ⎞⎠ kN
2.5 + 0.4

⎛ ⎛⎝⎛⎝Ved.B − Vrd.c⎞⎠ ⋅ 1.5⎞⎠ ⎞


ctθ2 ≔ 2.5 − ⎜――――――― ⎟ = 1.21
⎝ V Rd.max − V rd.c ⎠
ctθ2
s ≔ 0.9 ⋅ d ⋅ fywd ⋅ 226 ⋅ mm 2 ⋅ ――= 52.53 mm
Ved.B
Aleg etr.: ϕ12 /150:
⎛⎝226 ⋅ mm 2 ⎞⎠
VRd.s ≔ ――――⋅ 0.9 ⋅ d ⋅ fywd ⋅ ctθ2 = 583.169 kN
150 mm
VRd.s ≤ VRd.max = 1

ar1 ≔ 0.5 ⋅ 0.85 m ⋅ ctθ2 = 0.514 m


5. Lungimea de ancorare Marginal

α1 ≔ 1 α2 ≔ 1 α3 ≔ 1 α4 ≔ 1 α5 ≔ 0.7

d = 1.151 m

z ≔ 0.9 ⋅ d = 1.036 m

ctθ1 = 1.557 ctα ≔ 0

a1 ≔ 0.5 ⋅ z ⋅ ⎛⎝ctθ1 − ctα⎞⎠ = 0.807 m


Ved.A ⋅ a1
Fsd.1 ≔ ―――= 983.834 kN
z
Fsd.1 N
σsd.1 ≔ ――= 482.272 ――
Asl.r1 mm 2

Lungimea de ancorare la baza

ϕ1 ≔ 36 mm fbd ≔ 2.70 MPa


σsd.1
lbd.rqd1 ≔ 0.25 ⋅ ϕ1 ⋅ ―― = ⎛⎝1.608 ⋅ 10 3 ⎞⎠ mm
fbd

lb.min1 ≔ max ⎛⎝0.3 ⋅ lbd.rqd1 , 10 ⋅ ϕ1 , 100 mm⎞⎠ = 0.482 m

lbd.1 ≔ α1 ⋅ α2 ⋅ α3 ⋅ α4 ⋅ α5 ⋅ lbd.rqd1 = 1.125 m

lbd.1 ≥ lb.min1 = 1

Central
ϕ2 ≔ 36 mm
⎛ cnom − ϕ2 ⎞
α1 ≔ 1 α2 ≔ 1 − 0.15 ⋅ ⎜―――⎟ = 1.004
⎝ ϕ2 ⎠
k ≔ 0.1
12 ⋅ 226 − 0.25 ⋅ 1315.1
λ ≔ ―――――――= 1.812
1315.1
α3 ≔ 1 − k ⋅ λ = 0.819

α4 ≔ 0.7

α5 ≔ 1 − 0.04 ⋅ 0 = 1

d = 1.151 m
0 9 d 1 036
z ≔ 0.9 ⋅ d = 1.036 m

ctθ2 = 1.21 ctα ≔ 0

a2 ≔ 0.5 ⋅ z ⋅ ⎛⎝ctθ2 − ctα⎞⎠ = 0.627 m


Ved.B ⋅ a2
Fsd.2 ≔ ―――= ⎛⎝1.008 ⋅ 10 3 ⎞⎠ kN
z
Fsd.2 N
σsd.2 ≔ ――= 109.782 ――
Asl.r2 mm 2

Lungimea de ancorare la baza

ϕ2 ≔ 36 mm fbd ≔ 2.70 MPa


σsd.2
lbd.rqd2 ≔ 0.25 ⋅ ϕ2 ⋅ ―― = 365.942 mm
fbd

lb.min2 ≔ max ⎛⎝0.3 ⋅ lbd.rqd2 , 10 ⋅ ϕ2 , 100 mm⎞⎠ = 0.36 m

lbd.2 ≔ α1 ⋅ α2 ⋅ α3 ⋅ α4 ⋅ α5 ⋅ lbd.rqd2 lbd.2 ≔ 0.74 m

lbd.2 ≥ lb.min2 = 1

A t l
Armare stalp

Nmax ≔ 3192.37 kN Maf ≔ 701.612 kN ⋅ m

Mmax ≔ 2837.86 kN ⋅ m Naf ≔ 1565.14 kN

θy1 ≔ 0.071 rad

θz1 ≔ 0.027 rad

1. Determinarea coeficientului de zvelte:

bst ≔ 80 cm hst ≔ 80 cm

k1 ≔ 0.1 Nodul inferior incastrare perfecta

Nodul superior:
hst 3
I ≔ bst ⋅ ―― = ⎛⎝3.413 ⋅ 10 10⎞⎠ mm 4
12
E ≔ 18 GPa
θy1 ((E ⋅ I))
k2 ≔ ――⋅ ―― = 3.843
Mmax H
‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾
⎛ k1 ⎞ ⎛ k2 ⎞
l0 ≔ 0.5 ⋅ H ⋅ ⎜1 + ―――⎟ + ⎜1 + ―――⎟ = 3.508 m
⎝ 0.45 + k1 ⎠ ⎝ 0.45 + k2 ⎠
Nmax
n ≔ ―――― = 0.299
bst ⋅ hst ⋅ fcd

10.78
λlim ≔ ――= 19.705
‾‾
n

l0
λ ≔ ――― = 15.191
‾‾‾‾
bst 2

――
12

λ < λlim = 1 Deoarece coditia este verificata se pot neglija efectele de ordinul
2 dar se introduc excentricitati aditionale.

3 A l M iN
3. Armarea la M si N:
l0
e ≔ ―― = 0.877 cm
400
Nmax
Nmax ≔ 3192.37 kN Maf ≔ 701.612 kN ⋅ m ν ≔ ―――― = 0.299
bst ⋅ hst ⋅ fcd
Mmax ≔ 2837.86 kN ⋅ m Naf ≔ 1565.14 kN
Maf
Maf ≔ 701.612 kN ⋅ m + Nmax ⋅ e = 729.611 kN ⋅ m μ ≔ ―――― = 0.086
bst ⋅ hst 2 ⋅ fcd
Mmax ≔ 2837.86 kN ⋅ m + Naf ⋅ e = ⎛⎝2.852 ⋅ 10 3 ⎞⎠ kN ⋅ m
Mmax
Naf ≔ 1565.14 kN μ ≔ ―――― = 0.334
bst ⋅ hst 2 ⋅ fcd

Naf
ν ≔ ―――― = 0.147
bst ⋅ hst ⋅ fcd

ϕsl ≔ 25 mm

ϕsl
d1 ≔ cnom + ― + 8 mm = 55.5 mm
2
d1
―= 0.069
bst

Din figura 3.6 b) "Proiectearea structurilor din beton" Z. Kiss T. Onet pagina 60 se
determina coeficientul total de armare care pentru valorea μ sub 0.1 rezulta o armare
constructiva. In consecinda se va realiza armarea din combinatia de valori cu efort
axial maxim.
Nmax
As.min ≔ 0.1 ⋅ ――= 10.341 cm 2
fyd
As.min > 0.002 ⋅ bst 2 = 0

0.008 ⋅ bst 2 = 51.2 cm 2

Aleg: 9 ϕ28 : Asl ≔ 55.44 cm 2 Se alege aceasta arie de armatura pentru a


satisface distanta minima dintre bare si
procentul minim pentru clasa DCM.
Asl
――
2
ωtot ≔ ―――― = 0.08 Pe curba cu ωtot =0.09 si cu valoarea ν =0.224
fcd
bst ⋅ hst ⋅ ―― se determina valoarea μ =0.11
fyd
μ ≔ 0.11

Nrd ≔ bst ⋅ hst ⋅ fcd + fyd ⋅ Asl = ⎛⎝1.238 ⋅ 10 4 ⎞⎠ kN

Mrd ≔ bst ⋅ hst 2 ⋅ fcd ⋅ μ = 938.667 kN ⋅ m

3. Armarea la forta taietoare:

Ved ≔ 1665.24 kN
0.18 N fyk N
CRdc ≔ ―――― = ⎛⎝1.2 ⋅ 10 5 ⎞⎠ Pa fywd ≔ ―― = 308.696 ――
1.5 mm 2
1.15 mm 2
k1 ≔ 0.15 fck = 25
Nmax N
σcp ≔ ――― = 4.988 ―― η≔1
bst ⋅ hst mm 2
‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾
200 mm
k≔1+ ―――= 1.5 k≤2=1
bst
Asl
ρl ≔ ――― = 0.009 ρl < 0.02 = 1
bst ⋅ hst
⎛ ―⎞
1
⎜ 3⎟
Vrd.c ≔ ⎝⎛⎝k1 ⋅ σcp⎞⎠ + CRdc ⋅ 1 ⋅ k ⋅ ⎛⎝100 ⋅ ρl ⋅ fck⎞⎠ ⎠ ⋅ bGP ⋅ d = 863.207 kN

⎛ fck ⎞
ν1 ≔ 0.6 ⋅ ⎜1 − ―― ⎟ = 0.525
⎝ 200 ⎠
⎛⎝1 ⋅ bGP ⋅ 0.9 ⋅ d ⋅ ν1 ⋅ fcd⎞⎠
VRd.max ≔ ―――――――= ⎛⎝1.875 ⋅ 10 3 ⎞⎠ kN
2.5 + 0.4

⎛ ⎛⎝⎛⎝Ved − Vrd.c⎞⎠ ⋅ 1.5⎞⎠ ⎞


ctθ ≔ 2.5 − ⎜―――――― ⎟ = 1.311
⎝ VRd.max − Vrd.c ⎠
ctθ
s ≔ 0.9 ⋅ d ⋅ fywd ⋅ 226 ⋅ mm 2 ⋅ ―― = 56.912 mm
Ved
Aleg etr.: ϕ12 /200:
⎛⎝226 ⋅ mm 2 ⎞⎠
VRd.s ≔ ――――⋅ 0.9 ⋅ d ⋅ fywd ⋅ ctθ = 473.861 kN
200 mm
VRd.s ≤ VRd.max = 1

⎛ ⎛⎝H − hGP⎞⎠ ⎞
lcr ≔ max ⎜hst , 450 mm , ―――― ⎟ = 80 cm Pentru clasa de ductilitate DCM
⎝ 6 ⎠
dbl ≔ 22 mm Diametrul barelor longitudinale

b0 ≔ hst − cnom ⋅ 2 − 8 mm ⋅ 2 = 71.4 cm Sectiunea utila a stalpului


⎛ b0 ⎞
scl.max ≔ min ⎜8 ⋅ dbl , ―, 175 mm⎟ = 17.5 cm Distanta maxima dintre etrieri in
⎝ 2 ⎠ zona critica

You might also like