Female genital mutilation

Fact sheet
Updated February 2016

Key facts
• Female genital mutilation (FGM) includes procedures that intentionally alter or cause injury to the female genital
organs for non-medical reasons.
• The procedure has no health benefits for girls and women.
• Procedures can cause severe bleeding and problems urinating, and later cysts, infections, as well as
complications in childbirth and increased risk of newborn deaths.
• More than 200 million girls and women alive today have been cut in 30 countries in Africa, the Middle East and
Asia where FGM is concentrated1.
• FGM is mostly carried out on young girls between infancy and age 15.
• FGM is a violation of the human rights of girls and women.

Female genital mutilation (FGM) comprises all procedures that involve partial or total removal of the external
female genitalia, or other injury to the female genital organs for non-medical reasons.
The practice is mostly carried out by traditional circumcisers, who often play other central roles in communities,
such as attending childbirths. In many settings, health care providers perform FGM due to the erroneous belief
that the procedure is safer when medicalized1. WHO strongly urges health professionals not to perform such
procedures.
FGM is recognized internationally as a violation of the human rights of girls and women. It reflects deep-rooted
inequality between the sexes, and constitutes an extreme form of discrimination against women. It is nearly
always carried out on minors and is a violation of the rights of children. The practice also violates a person's
rights to health, security and physical integrity, the right to be free from torture and cruel, inhuman or degrading
treatment, and the right to life when the procedure results in death.

Procedures
Female genital mutilation is classified into 4 major types.
• Type 1: Often referred to as clitoridectomy, this is the partial or total removal of the clitoris (a small, sensitive
and erectile part of the female genitals), and in very rare cases, only the prepuce (the fold of skin surrounding the
clitoris).
• Type 2: Often referred to as excision, this is the partial or total removal of the clitoris and the labia minora (the
inner folds of the vulva), with or without excision of the labia majora (the outer folds of skin of the vulva ).
• Type 3: Often referred to as infibulation, this is the narrowing of the vaginal opening through the creation of a
covering seal. The seal is formed by cutting and repositioning the labia minora, or labia majora, sometimes
through stitching, with or without removal of the clitoris (clitoridectomy).
• Type 4: This includes all other harmful procedures to the female genitalia for non-medical purposes, e.g.
pricking, piercing, incising, scraping and cauterizing the genital area.
Deinfibulation refers to the practice of cutting open the sealed vaginal opening in a woman who has been
infibulated, which is often necessary for improving health and well-being as well as to allow intercourse or to
facilitate childbirth.

No health benefits, only harm

FGM has no health benefits, and it harms girls and women in many ways. It involves removing and damaging
healthy and normal female genital tissue, and interferes with the natural functions of girls' and women's bodies.
Generally speaking, risks increase with increasing severity of the procedure.

Immediate complications can include:

• severe pain
• excessive bleeding (haemorrhage)
• genital tissue swelling
• fever
• infections e.g., tetanus
• urinary problems
• wound healing problems
• injury to surrounding genital tissue
• shock
• death.
Long-term consequences can include:
• urinary problems (painful urination, urinary tract infections);
• vaginal problems (discharge, itching, bacterial vaginosis and other infections);
• menstrual problems (painful menstruations, difficulty in passing menstrual blood, etc.);
• scar tissue and keloid;
• sexual problems (pain during intercourse, decreased satisfaction, etc.);
• increased risk of childbirth complications (difficult delivery, excessive bleeding, caesarean section,
need to resuscitate the baby, etc.) and newborn deaths;
• need for later surgeries: for example, the FGM procedure that seals or narrows a vaginal opening
(type 3) needs to be cut open later to allow for sexual intercourse and childbirth (deinfibulation).
Sometimes genital tissue is stitched again several times, including after childbirth, hence the
woman goes through repeated opening and closing procedures, further increasing both immediate
and long-term risks;
• psychological problems (depression, anxiety, post-traumatic stress disorder, low self-esteem, etc.).

[Also see: Health complications of female genital mutilation]

Who is at risk?
Procedures are mostly carried out on young girls sometime between infancy and adolescence, and occasionally
on adult women. More than 3 million girls are estimated to be at risk for FGM annually.

More than 200 million girls and women alive today have been cut in 30 countries in Africa, the Middle East and
Asia where FGM is concentrated 1.

The practice is most common in the western, eastern, and north-eastern regions of Africa, in some countries the
Middle East and Asia, as well as among migrants from these areas. FGM is therefore a global concern.
Cultural and social factors for performing FGM
The reasons why female genital mutilations are performed vary from one region to another as well as over time,
and include a mix of sociocultural factors within families and communities. The most commonly cited reasons
are:
• Where FGM is a social convention (social norm), the social pressure to conform to what others do and
have been doing, as well as the need to be accepted socially and the fear of being rejected by the
community, are strong motivations to perpetuate the practice. In some communities, FGM is almost
universally performed and unquestioned.
• FGM is often considered a necessary part of raising a girl, and a way to prepare her for adulthood and
marriage.
• FGM is often motivated by beliefs about what is considered acceptable sexual behaviour. It aims to
ensure premarital virginity and marital fidelity. FGM is in many communities believed to reduce a
woman's libido and therefore believed to help her resist extramarital sexual acts. When a vaginal
opening is covered or narrowed (type 3), the fear of the pain of opening it, and the fear that this will be
found out, is expected to further discourage extramarital sexual intercourse among women with this
type of FGM.
• Where it is believed that being cut increases marriageability, FGM is more likely to be carried out.
• FGM is associated with cultural ideals of femininity and modesty, which include the notion that girls
are clean and beautiful after removal of body parts that are considered unclean, unfeminine or male.
• Though no religious scripts prescribe the practice, practitioners often believe the practice has religious
support.
• Religious leaders take varying positions with regard to FGM: some promote it, some consider it
irrelevant to religion, and others contribute to its elimination.
• Local structures of power and authority, such as community leaders, religious leaders, circumcisers, and
even some medical personnel can contribute to upholding the practice.
• In most societies, where FGM is practised, it is considered a cultural tradition, which is often used as an
argument for its continuation.
• In some societies, recent adoption of the practice is linked to copying the traditions of neighbouring
groups. Sometimes it has started as part of a wider religious or traditional revival movement.

International response
Building on work from previous decades, in 1997, WHO issued a joint statement against the practice of FGM
together with the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) and the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA).
Since 1997, great efforts have been made to counteract FGM, through research, work within communities, and
changes in public policy.

Progress at international, national and sub-national levels includes:

• wider international involvement to stop FGM;
• international monitoring bodies and resolutions that condemn the practice;
• revised legal frameworks and growing political support to end FGM (this includes a law against FGM
in 26 countries in Africa and the Middle East, as well as in 33 other countries with migrant populations
from FGM practicing countries);
• the prevalence of FGM has decreased in most countries and an increasing number of women and men
in practising communities support ending its practice.

Research shows that, if practicing communities themselves decide to abandon FGM, the practice can be
eliminated very rapidly.

In 2007, UNFPA and UNICEF initiated the Joint Programme on Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting to accelerate
the abandonment of the practice.
In 2008, WHO together with 9 other United Nations partners, issued a statement on the elimination of FGM to
support increased advocacy for its abandonment, called: “Eliminating female genital mutilation: an interagency
statement”. This statement provided evidence collected over the previous decade about the practice of FGM.

In 2010, WHO published a "Global strategy to stop health care providers from performing female genital
mutilation" in collaboration with other key UN agencies and international organizations.

In December 2012, the UN General Assembly adopted a resolution on the elimination of female genital
mutilation.

Building on a previous report from 2013, in 2016 UNICEF launched an updated report documenting the
prevalence of FGM in 30 countries, as well as beliefs, attitudes, trends, and programmatic and policy responses
to the practice globally.

WHO is publishing “Guidelines on the Management of Health Complications from Female Genital Mutilation”
in 2016, which aim to support health care professionals in their care to girls and women that have undergone
FGM.

WHO response
In 2008, the World Health Assembly passed resolution WHA61.16 on the elimination of FGM, emphasizing the
need for concerted action in all sectors - health, education, finance, justice and women's affairs.
WHO efforts to eliminate female genital mutilation focus on:

• strengthening the health sector response: guidelines, training and policy to ensure that health
professionals can provide medical care and counselling to girls and women living with FGM;
• building evidence: generating knowledge about the causes and consequences of the practice, how
to eliminate it, and how to care for those who have experienced FGM;
• increasing advocacy: developing publications and advocacy tools for international, regional and
local efforts to end FGM within a generation.

Citations: 1 Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting: A Global Concern

UNICEF, New York, 2016.













Document source: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs241/en (Updated February 2016)