INTRODUCTION

The original research for this book was done as fieldwork for a
Master of Anthropology degree from the University of Adelaide,
South Australia. [1] It was a study of the methods by which the
Mormon church [sic] creates a new 'reality' for their young
missionaries. [2] The task was to investigate how a group of young
men and women could be sent into 'the field' to preach for and
defend an organization that was really undefendable in a traditional
Christian context. [3] We looked at the ways the Church imposed
[4] its control over these young people. [5] The study had the full
support and cooperation of the Church hierarchy. The First
Quorum of Seventies [6] [the mission board] [7] and the Apostle of
the Church, [8] Mr. Gorden [could he possibly mean GORDON?]
Hinckley, gave this task their full encouragement, because of their
belief that 'anyone who really understands what the Mormon
Church is all about can do nothing else but join'. The only
important condition placed upon the study was that we tell the
truth about what we might learn, [9] because they know from bitter
experience that they don't always get fair treatment from their
'reviewers'. [10] The Mission President [11] told me that there
were over 1,600 violently anti-Mormon books on collection in Salt
Lake City.

We have done our best to report on the Church as we found it, [12]
which is not to say that Mormons will be happy with the
conclusions. [13] Errors of omission are regretted, but since this is
but a short study, [14] we have been unable to follow all the
thoughts to their logical conclusions. [15] Knowledgeable readers
[16] will be able to identify a number of points which have not
been addressed at all. [17] But we have addressed all the important
ones. [18]

We owe a great debt of gratitude to a large number of very kind

Mormons who took us into their homes and confidences; all being
eager for us to understand them and to be known for what they are;
[19] honest, hardworking, humble people worshipping their god
[20] with a great zeal, confident of a good reward if they keep their
faith to the end. [21] However, contrary to the opinion that we
would become a good Mormon ourselves [22] [they even had us
scheduled in for baptism, without our knowledge, at one time],
[23] the more we searched into their doctrines and the foundations
of the Church, [24] the more obvious became the errors of their
whole system. We had thought that the Church was just another of
the apostate daughters of Church of Rome [25] (cf. Rev. 17:5), but
what opened up before us was a world of intrigue and error,
masquerading as Christianity, [26] that has ensnared millions of
innocent, naive people around the world. [27] By comparing the
truth about their founders, as revealed by people who knew them
best [friends, neighbors, the courts, and various enemies both from
inside and outside the Church itself]; with the 'improved version' of
the Church as it is taught by them today, [28] one is led to the only
conclusion possible: the [sic] Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day
[29] Saints has both deluded itself and is deluding many in the
world around it as they embrace its teachings. [30]

Ronnie Bray comments:

1. I contacted this University. They had no knowledge of

Brinkerhoff or his fieldwork or his pursuit of a masters
degree.
2. There is no evidence in this ‘fieldwork’ book that this subject
was ever broached.
3. There is no evidence in this ‘fieldwork’ book that this subject
was ever broached.
4. This question is begged. Evidence of sinister work by
Brinkerhoff. No evidence for any such imposition is either
presented or ever likely to be found within Mormonism.
5. There is no evidence in this ‘fieldwork’ book that this subject
was ever broached.
6. The first Quorum of Seventy.
7. Some members of the Seventy serve on the ‘Missionary
Board’.
8. There is no such position as ‘The Apostle of the Church.’
This type of error betrays Brinkerhoff’s lack of scholastic and
academic rigour, especially for one in pursuit, he alleges, of a
higher degree.
9. Brinkerhoff failed abysmally to achieve this because he took
the lazy man’s way and read the work of other Anti-Mormons.
10. As in Brinkerhoff’s case.
11. The Mission President is not identified.
12. This has to be an outright lie unless he means as he found it
reported in the works of Martin, the Tanners, and other
avowed enemies of Mormonism. This cannot be a
recommendation for anyone to place his or her trust in
Brinkerhoff’s ‘revelations.’
13. No one can be contented or happy with lies, unless it is Forest
A Brinkerhoff.
14. Masters Degrees are not usually satisfied with ‘short studies.’
They have to have some meat and some merit and some
original research. Plundering Martin’s atrocious Kingdom of
the Cults, &c, is not the avenue to a Masters Degree.
15. Since there is no logic in Brinkerhoff’s work, this is a safe bet.
16. Brinkerhoff apparently has his own definition of what
constitutes a ‘knowledgeable reader.’ It has to be one that is
not taught by Brinkerhoff and is not dependent on Brinkerhoff
for what he or she knows about Mormonism.
17. Such as the TRUTH?
18. Important to whom? Unschooled scribblers?
19. Obviously believing you would be fair and honest, rather than
– as you proved to be – treacherous.
20. ‘god’ is usually capitalised by those that know and respect
Him. Such belittlement betrays Brinkerhoff’s mile wide mean
streak.
21. A solid biblical teaching. “If ye endure to the end … ”
22. Sloppy grammar – ‘we’ is plural, and ‘a’ good Mormon is
singular, and the twain cannot be used with each other except
when basic, first grade, scholarship is lacking to a notable
degree.
23. This is highly unlikely. Baptisms are always scheduled with
the candidate for baptism. Hence, this is an extremely suspect
statement.
24. No such research is evident in this book. Why raise in an
introduction that which is not addressed in the thesis? Just
another broken promise from Brinkerhoff: just another faded
hope that he might actually have done something correct in
his research. However, it proves to be simply one more
disappointment among many disappointments.
25. Pity he cannot find words to say why he would think this to be
the case and mention if as a propositional statement without
any further development of the strain. Perhaps assembling
material for a higher degree was too much of a strain for
Brinkerhoff.
26. He fails to show this to be the case. Why? What is wrong
with the man?
27. Again, Brinkerhoff’s trade mark is opinionated statement
without visible means of support. Direct evidence of his
mental vagrancy.
28. It is hardly ‘compared’ in this effete body of work. Throwing
in the odd scripture that applies to Mormonism as well as
Christadelphianism and then claiming that Mormons do not
believe it is silly in the extreme, and dishonest to boot. He
bears false witness by the usual methods used by anti-
Mormons that, for the most part, are bitterly anti-
Christadelphian.
29. The name of the Church that Brinkerhoff says he is studying
for a Masters Degree in Anthropology is, “The Church of
Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints” and not “The Church of
Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints.” Anyone capable of
pursuing a Masters Degree will know the name of his subject.
 Brinkerhoff repeatedly demonstrates that he is incapable of
earning a decent grade in an ‘O’ Level English Language test,
taken by 16 year old schoolchildren in the British educational
system.
30. Since there is no evidence presented by Brinkerhoff regarding
the subjects he assays in this introduction to address, and since
that which is not addressed cannot lead to anything like a
conclusion, the only safe conclusion is that Brinkerhoff
formed his conclusion prior to penning his introduction and
did nothing to test his proposition. Rather, he has lied and
cheated his way through this book, another reason why the
University of Adelaide have NO record of Brinkerhoff.
Perhaps he attended a barbecue there one time and, after the
fashion of his major informant, Bogus-Doctor Walter ‘Liar’
Martin claimed to have all kinds of degrees. He has foolishly
let Martin lead him straight into the ditch that is full of those
whose Bibles have been mutilated at the point where most
others declare, “Thou shalt not bear false witness ... ” That is
the only possible conclusion.

Sad – but undeniably true!

Ronnie Bray