Robert Gluck Family Poems 1
Robert Gluck Family Poems 1
R O B E R T G L U C K
r~
I - ^•iMMMUHiMMaMHMfeMMM ^i
Other Books: Family Poems
A N D Y (1973)
M A R S H A POEMS {197?;
METAPHYSICS (1977)
JYAIB
F 3
"IF
H o m a g e t o C o u s i n Bette
10 11
T^
12
13
IT
14 15
letters, a little too loud. T h a t is, she spoke like an adult speaks Scar
to a third grader. " H o w Very Nice T o See You Bobby " " H o w
During dinner Ed began one of the stories out of his past and
IsYourMother?»"OhWhatAGoodReportCard.»Irealized
o u t of the blue whose connecting link to the present did not
t h a t she had never talked t o m e without condescension.
trouble either of them. It was about John Abeel's father, Ed's
Rather, she talked d o w n to everyone. I didn't k n o w then w h a t
I w a n t e d her to say. I wanted her to say, " W h y don't you go step-mother's ex-husband, a mechanic w h o made his living
over to the m a p and point o u t N o r t h America." with three yellow earth-movers and a few trucks for hauling
and dumping. Bob watched Ed tell the story more than he
If M r s . Scranage is n o t dead by n o w , she's almost dead. My
listened to the actual story. They sat by a window with white
3rd grade humiliation is only light waves traveling to the stars
curtains. T h e summery evening light reflected off a window
But here's the crux of m y story. I would love to rip her skull off
opposite theirs and o n t o their chicken and peas. Mr. Abeel's
t o p u m m e l her complacent gut, her small death's head. I mean I
garage h a d every kind of gigantic pipe-wrench, file, soldering
w o u l d like to kick and harm her dinosaur grandmotherly
iron, pliers, a n d so on, all in greasy black heaps, so that Ed
body. H o w d o I rescue this e x p l o s i o n - t h i s dishonesty
t h o u g h t this greasy disorganization was the main feature of all
supposedly surrounded by four directions-
garages a n d masculine w o r k areas. M r . Abeel made his son eat
t w o teaspoons of dirt t o m a k e him tough, t o make a m a n o u t of
him. M r . Abeel w a s very neurotic and went in and out of what
Ed called the "mental institution." Bob reflected that a lot of
people from Ed's childhood did that, and that Ed said it
casually. They seemed to go to sanitariums as one feasible and
even attractive alternative in life. Meanwhile Bob was noticing
a scar o n Ed's upper lip. He knew the scar but had never seen it
d o t h i s : every time Ed chewed d o w n the scar lit up, the blood
drained a w a y from the thin line, leaving a wire of light in the
dusky sky of Ed's skin. Ed was saying that then Mr. Abeel
became a Jesus freak. H e came preaching to Ed's front door.
Bob said, "I didn't k n o w people's parents became Jesus freaks,
I t h o u g h t only people did."
M e a n w h i l e the scar went on, off, on, off, with each bite
d o w n . Bob wondered if he should point it o u t to Ed but
^
decided no, decided t h a t it would be taken wrong, and in fact it
w o u l d n o t have been meant as a compliment. N o . O n the other
h a n d , Bob asked himself if he could love the scar and answered
yes. T h e n M r . Abeel became the manager of a seedy gay 90s
hotel in d o w n t o w n Tacoma. If he could love that scar, Bob
w o n d e r e d , w h a t else was he capable of loving ?
16
17
T h e Body
18 19
her h u s b a n d of fifty years, smiling M a x the
tailor—everyone liked him better—moved out
time a n d time again while she crochets bitter
patterns Sc schemes like M a d a m e LaFarge, her secret A b u g crawls behind a painting of a mountain
real estate deals and her fear that M a x would I think, a b u g crawled behind a mountain.-
oudive her Sc spend all her money (he did)
A b a t h r o o m door swings o u t and voila!
Rose at the hospital: the sublime poet making cong-cong Sc shi-shi
her anger Sc the corresponding impenetrable cheerfulness for everyone to s e e - W h y not corral all
of the nurses until she throws her filled-up bedpans
these thoughts in the body, why not
a t them
as well as t h e -
Shvartzes! Shikses! u g h ! dirty dirty d i r t - f e h !
her last words—"But I took all my vitamins."
21
20
M a n g l e Story stick t o her w o r d . But when she only tapped my shoulder with
her fist I became sick with sensual feeling and frustration. I
begged her to hit me again, but then I could see her starting to
get m a d .
I w a s compromised into thinking everything was "nice," a
blanket of nice so t h a t it's hard to remember because so much
w a s n ' t nice:
I was practicing, or rather n o t practicing my ballet exercises So I organized this S8cM scenario with my mother in which
in the basement on the barres my dad had built into the wall for I w a s the masochist, b u t really the sadist because my will
m y 9 t h birthday. M y mother sat at the mangle. The mangle imposed o n hers. And where in this imbroglio of feeling was
was a sit-down ironing machine popular in the fifties. You ran m y father, the king of the enemy ? If I could have forced her to
it with foot pedals like a sewing machine. My mother had w o u n d me, w h a t triumph I would have enjoyed over him. If I
slipped her disc and the mangle was a precaution for her back. could have convinced her, w h a t victory of speech, of language.
I w a s talking to my mother and she was responding with W h a t evidence of my desire's power to seduce words into a soft
h u m m s a n d tsks, her back turned to me, her attention divided pillow and soft sheets in order to proceed to further seduc-
between me and the sheets. I was excited by the idea of tions :
rescuing her from this painful life. I felt a powerful surge and
to carry her up to the rook's castle
welling up of love for her, felt it with my whole body. I asked
at the top of the glass mountain!
her t o hit me. Of course she said no. I asked her again. I was
submerged, hardly ever conscious, and when I surfaced to
create a n event in the real world the form it would take was
always a mystery. M y mother, giving less attention to the
pillow cases, said, " W h y should I, you weren't a bad boy were A n d so this was a world of three elements: my father (more
you ? " I explained that I just wanted her to hit me, that's all. accurately my father's absence), my mother and myself. I
T h e urgency in my voice made her stop mangling completely w a n t e d t o challenge the elements as in dreams when you
although she still talked with her back to me. She laughed from breathe underwater or fly. If I could have swam through my
uncertainty and said n o she didn't w a n t to hurt me. I became father's tears breathing against his will. Instead he cast me into
playful. Then I tried child psychology. She generalized: she a sunken marble swimming pool filled with a delirium tremens
d i d n ' t w a n t to hurt any of her children. I pleaded that all she of snakes. W h a t a way to treat his Persian and heir to reading in
H
h a d to d o was hit me in the shoulder. I implored her. Reluc- the t u b the kingly Sunday paper. If I could have spread my
tantly she agreed. By then I was right by her side in the pose and arms parallel to the ground and run and with that extra
m o o d of Ingres' Jupiter and Thetis (except I was standing, but separate muscular life, that sensual lift, carried my mother up.
short). But the story required a gift, a wound, to transform its love and
M y mother tried to refuse again, her face showed "good anger into flight which in turn I could have given to you.
Instead I can only give this story, which is the same as sitting
h u m o r e d " irritation at the violence of my request. I made her
with m y back to you, half-listening.
22
Poem Mexico
24 25
I browsed along, relishing the high blue malls, and turned b e y o n d me. W h e n You Were Sweet Sixteen, Elsie Schultz-
into a store t h a t w a s like the other stores. It was heaped with enheim, I'm Looking Over a Four Leaf Clover, Old Black Joe,
cheap colorful things. I narrowed my eyes looking for the exact C o m i n g ' R o u n d the M o u n t a i n , Night Sc Day, Hava Nagila,
treasure. I looked a t the chess sets, the red lowfire pottery, the Dixie, America the Beautiful. They talked about my grand-
Aztec book-ends. I looked in a case of hammered silver rings. m o t h e r ' s will. W h o will get the building, the" good diamond
T h e as yet unseen shop attendant stepped into place. I looked earrings, the b a d diamond earrings, Aunt Helen will be pro-
at him. H e was very slender. H e was older but he reminded me vided for, the pearls, the lot in California City. M y sister said,
of Bernie Barbash from the 3rd grade, whose ears Sc fingers " I ' m going to p o k e you with this ruler if you d o n ' t answer me
were translucent and whose face always hovered in the out- a n d carry o n a decent conversation."
skirts of the cry position. "You like me to open the case ? " I W h e n w e arrived home I went into the pastel bathroom and
looked at him and shook my head no. I thought, " I bet he m a s t u r b a t e d . I feared the authority it would give t o the ex-
sleeps on a cot, I bet he's p o o r . " I felt as though I'd spent my life perience, locating as it did the h u m a n response. I sat there
sitting on a birthday cake. H e opened the case and I moved my utterly drained, hating Mexico 8c hating the USA. Tell me,
h a n d over the rings. H e stroked the t o p of my hand and said, given the options, where would your anger have taken you—
" A ring for your boyfriend? You have a boyfriend?" H e where has it taken you ?
smiled directly into my eyes. N o t having the tools to respond in
any way, I moved away slowly in order to disappear, but he
came around the counter and as I looked back at him, both of
us stepping over pottery jars, he brushed my thigh with his
h a n d saying, "You be my boyfriend?" Did he w a n t my
m o n e y ? I didn't exactly stay, b u t I didn't leave either. I just
moved around, followed, until, n o t knowing how to say good-
by to all this, I slipped away.
27
26
IS
!
R e m a r k s o n N a r r a t i v e : the Example
of R o b e r t Gliick's Poetry
"There is a story being told
about you..."
1.
If nothing else— b u t there certainly is a great deal more here—
R o b e r t Gliick's offering of narrations attracts attention as
storytelling.' T h e stories and poems present themselves to us as
a series of developments of narrative possibilities in poetry
itself. As has n o w been apparent for some time, the poetry of
t h e '70s seems generally to have reached a point of stagnation,
increasing a kind of refinement of technique and available
forms, w i t h o u t yet being able to profit gready from the vigor,
energy a n d accessibility t h a t mark so much of the new
M o v e m e n t writing of gays, w o m e n and Third World writers,
a m o n g others. Ultimately this impasse of poetry reflects
conditions in society itself. In the meantime, however, poetry's
consciousness of itself in relation to society can often be more
progressive a n d open t o n e w awareness when it takes the form
of a critique of its o w n poetic forms.
2.
R o b e r t Gliick's narratives seem to me to be just such a critique
of m a n y recent formalistic tendencies in poetry, particularly
the n e w trends toward conceptualization, linguistic abstrac-
tion a n d process poetry. These various orientations appear as a
refusal t o be heard socially, that is, to speak to any real
audience. T h u s the function of the poem often seems t o
continue the a u t o n o m o u s Modernist sense of the poem's
existence on the page, and only there. Counteracting some of
29
g^BBl
4.
these tendencies, Frank O ' H a r a in the '50s and early '60s, and If o n e of the concerns of a certain type of Jewish joke has been
then some of the poets in N e w York—Ron Padgett should be t o reconcile the unreconcilable, then what is being narrated
mentioned particularly—began to integrate narrative material here seems to insist on an extremely unreconcilable side of
as a technique to constitute the poem again socially. Robert things. "It cost X X X b u t it was worth it your uncle nearly
Gliick's poems seem to come from, and be a development of, killed m e , " says A u n t Sura. Of course—and we take it for
this countertendency to prevailing Modernist practices. His g r a n t e d — s u c h a family life is not healthy. But that after all
p o e m s in this respect bring out a strongly judgmental or m a y n o t be the main point. O r we could p u t it another way. We
juridical aspect of this narrative function in a tradition which might ask w h o the subject of these poems might be. And we
u p to n o w has not adequately or politically appreciated it. might also ask w h o or w h a t their object could be.
At the end of the "Mangle Story," for instance, we find that
3. t h r o u g h some sleight of hand it is we ourselves w h o have
become the n a r r a t o r of the story, and through a linguistic ruse
I say 'politically' because I think this is the real meaning behind
the subject of these stories has become only a conveniently
the confusing narrative disguises that these poems often take
transferrable function. And the narrator has become the object
on. They find it satisfying, 'for instance, to keep a running
of a n e w narration being told—this time by ourselves. What
commentary on themselves—the metatext that is spoken from
t h e n a r r a t o r seems to be claiming then is that it is the act of
the present—while onstage appear conventional anecdotes,
narrating itself that causes the narrative function to slip across
such as these narratives of someone's past, of ethnicity and
the invisible bar of separation—from him to us. Thus at the
family life. They are stories that mime a past as overheard by a
conclusion of this anecdote he tells us that he "can only give
mocking, sometimes cynical presence that seems to be ma-
(you) this story, which is the same as sitting with my back to
nipulating them for its own ends. But when we think a b o u t it
you, half-listening." Are the narrator's claims to indifference
these stories may seem rather odd in other ways too. Some-
sincere t h e n ? We suspect not. The narrator can hardly be
times they may seem t o have an air of the slightly risque, or else
indifferent if a t this point the question for both us and for him
of the puzzlingly factitious or 'worked up,' but at all events of a
is, w h o is the ' w h o ' telling the story ?—and h o w could we
certain rather embarrassing tone that for some reason appears
indicate this subject? Freud, knowledgeable enough about
t o be assuming our complicity in its own slightly shady or
such matters to follow his 'dream-book' a little later with his
seedy designs. We ought to be shocked of course, but we are
'joke-book,' thereby doubly accomodating the examples of
n o t . These feelings clearly w a r n us—be on your guard, because
w i t from his o w n tradition, may be invoked here to tell us
these stories concern you. But the question is, how ? For w h a t
something important a b o u t the story he disclosed as the
is after all to be done with a set of stories whose every
n a r r a t i o n of a dream 'structured like a language'—and always
ridiculous conclusion is a vaudeville death? "Bobby, your
taking place 'elsewhere,' as Lacan would later point out. For
m o t h e r has the face/of an angel and a heart of gold, /and you'll
Freud the question of the narration is thus the place of the
be sorry w h e n she's d e a d . " Certainly these stories are every bit
subject—the subject w h o is recounting that narration. It is to
as h u m o r o u s as they are intended to be. But aren't they also in a
this question, the question of the location of the subject
sense compromising—to the extent that we find them as
actually speaking these poems and stories, that we should now
h u m o r o u s as they say they are ?
t u r n o u r a t t e n t i o n — t o locate, that is, that offstage 'elsewhere,'
30 31
VSk
mmm*mj*
-r^r
5.
Conditions of reality operate in these poems and stories as a
return to a social origin as well as to a destination of the
narrative—ourselves as that 'audience' both hearing and
producing these same stories. The narrative function reveals
itself in the technical features which characterize it. The
'deceptive' ending, o r ending of reversal, the rhetorical texture
of a h u m o r t h a t makes us accomplices of a narrator w h o seems
t o claim that ethnic and family caricatures are indeed reflec-
tions of ' h o w things are'; or else ("The Body") the juridical
a n d semantic usage of anger, acting as warnings or signals that
the poems are partisan, and intended to have real effects on
u s — a judgmental viewpoint that declines to be 'objective' in
any sense that would satisfy us. These devices constitute a
transfer of the subject from a local determination in the
speaking narrator to a more profound and generalized func-
tion which may be thought of as society itself, as it tells us the
story t h a t continues to constitute it.
Bruce Boone
32