0% found this document useful (0 votes)
82 views62 pages

Warehouse Optimization

The document discusses trends in warehouse design and operations. It makes three key points: 1) Warehouse design should be based on patterns of customer orders and local economics, accounting for both space and time costs. 2) The "fastest-moving SKUs" should be given the most convenient storage locations to minimize time spent fulfilling orders. 3) Decisions about storage location assignments should consider the "bang-for-the-buck" - how much demand and order volume an SKU generates relative to the space and time resources it requires. This reflects the tradeoff between optimizing for space versus time.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
82 views62 pages

Warehouse Optimization

The document discusses trends in warehouse design and operations. It makes three key points: 1) Warehouse design should be based on patterns of customer orders and local economics, accounting for both space and time costs. 2) The "fastest-moving SKUs" should be given the most convenient storage locations to minimize time spent fulfilling orders. 3) Decisions about storage location assignments should consider the "bang-for-the-buck" - how much demand and order volume an SKU generates relative to the space and time resources it requires. This reflects the tradeoff between optimizing for space versus time.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 62

Warehousing in 2035

John J. BARTHOLDI III

Georgia Tech - Panama Logistics Innovation & Research Center

Georgia Institute of Technology

www.warehouse-science.com
Significant trends

• Science of warehousing

• Distributed automation
Port of Singapore, 1970 and 2010
4
Law of Warehousing:
“Put the fastest-moving SKUs in the most
convenient locations.”

5
Picks

Skus

6
Picks

Skus

7
8
Two fundamental warehouse resources

Space Time

9
CUSTOMER ORDER
Order-line SKU Quantity Unit of Measure
1 ABC123 6 cases
2 DEF456 2 pieces

Time Space
Units of handling

Time efficient

Space efficient
11
Space and time

12
13
Trading space for time

14
US

15
16
Germany

17
Singapore

18
Singapore, US

19
Central America

20
Two beer distributors

21
Which SKU should get the more convenient
locations in a FIFO warehouse?

Sku Rate of flow Average on-hand


A 100 pallets per week 500 pallets
B 10 pallets every other week 20 pallets

22
Which SKU should get the more convenient
locations in a FIFO warehouse?

Sku Rate of flow Average on-hand


A 100 pallets per week 500 pallets
B 10 pallets every other week 20 pallets

Pallets of B spend less time in the warehouse

23
24
25
Shared storage Dedicated storage

Ground floor
3 min per restock pallet 1 min per pick
positions

Overhead
pallet
positions

2 min per pick

26
Which have strongest claim to forward space?

Case Demand Pallet Benefit per


SKU
picks (pallets) locations location

A 600 20 2

B 1,000 100 3

C 1,800 700 4

27
Which have strongest claim to forward space?

Case Demand Pallet Benefit per


SKU
picks (pallets) locations location

A 600 20 2

B 1,000 100 3

C 1,800 700 4

forecast forecast
orders sales
28
Which have strongest claim to forward space?

Case Demand Pallet Benefit per


SKU
picks (pallets) locations location

A 600 20 2

B 1,000 100 3

C 1,800 700 4

time space

29
“Bang-for-the-buck”

Case Demand Pallet Benefit per


SKU
picks (pallets) locations location

A 600 20 2

(2 1) 600 (3) 20
= 270
2

30
Bang-for-the-buck: reflects both time and space

Case Demand Pallet Benefit per


SKU
picks (pallets) locations location

A 600 20 2 270

(2 1) 600 (3) 20
= 270
2

31
Bang-for-the-buck

Case Demand Pallet Benefit per


SKU
picks (pallets) locations location

A 600 20 2 270

B 1,000 100 3 233

C 1,800 700 4

32
Bang-for-the-buck

Case Demand Pallet Benefit per


SKU
picks (pallets) locations location

A 600 20 2 270

B 1,000 100 3 233

C 1,800 700 4 -75

33
100
Minutes per location

100

200

300
100 200 300 400 500 600
SKUs
34
100
Minutes per location

100

200

300
100 200 300 400 500 600
SKUs
35
What to do about Coke Classic?

(2 1) 1800 (3) 700


= 75
4

36
Change the economics

(2 1) 1800 (3) 700


= 75
4

37
Change the process

38
How does the value of the forward pick area
change...

• After a marketing campaign to attract new customers?

• After a marketing campaign to convince current customers to consume


more?

39
Summary

• Warehouse design should be based on

• The pattern of customer orders, and

• Local economics.

• Decisions should account for economics of both space and time.

40
Distributed automation
Throughput

Capacity

Requirements

Time
Storage
module
• More varied storage than
typical automation

• Robot travels slowly but brings


more SKUs
Convey, store, sort
Dense storage
Simulations courtesy of Kevin Gue
Bulk

Reserve

Forward

Reserve

GridPick
Bulk

Reserve

Forward

Reserve

GridPick
Bulk

Reserve

Forward

Reserve

GridPick
Sort
¡Muchas gracias!

You might also like