Statistical Methods for Management: Group
Assignment
Impact of Physical Fitness on Employee Productivity
Puneet Tokas
Manasvi Bansal
Anandita Kar
B. Abirami
Pallavi Keshri
1
TABLE OF CONTENTS
S. No. Topic Page No.
1. Introduction & Objectives of the Study 3
3. Research Methodology 4
4. Data Analysis & Interpretation
5. Findings of the study
6. Conclusion
7. Suggestions
Annexures
QN
8. exce
2
INTRODUCTION & OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY
INTRODUCTION
This research is conducted so as to understand the impact physical fitness has on
employee productivity. In today’s sedentary lifestyle, it is becoming all the more important for
employees to engage in physical activity. It not only improves physical health but also mental
health. Physical exercise is the performance of some activity to enhance physical fitness and
overall health and wellness. A good physical exercise involves at least 30 minutes and hence in
this research anyone engaging in any physical activity for more than 30 minutes is considered to
be physically active. The proxies for productivity in this study are low absenteeism, alertness,
speed of work completion, level of activeness, level of stress and diseases of the employee.
With the help of a structured questionnaire administered to 100 respondents spanning
across varied fields like business management, engineering, marketing, IT, health sector,
software development etc., we aimed to examine the difference between the productiveness of
those who engage in physical activity and those who do not. According to the results of our
study, it was found that
OBJECTIVES
To descriptively examine the relationship between physical activity and employee
productivity
To find whether there exists a difference between the work productivities of employees
who exercise and those who do not
3
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
SOURCE OF DATA
Data is primary in nature and is collected from the sample of working professionals aged
between 20 to 40.
DATA COLLECTION METHOD
The data has been collected with the help of a structured questionnaire by the means of a google
form.
TIME FRAME
The data has been collected over a period of 2 weeks.
DATA ANALYSIS METHOD
Coding- scale
The data has been analyzed by using descriptive statistical methods such as mean, media, mode,
standard deviation, variance, percentages, skewness and kurtosis. It is presented in the form of
graphs and tables.
SOFTWARE
SPSS as well as Excel was used to analyze the data collected.
4
DATA ANALYSIS & INTERPRETATION
The data collected from the questionnaire was analyzed as follows taking into
account the following parameters:
1. Age
Statistics
Age
N Valid 100
Missing 0
Mean 24.8600
Median 23.0000
Mode 22.00
Age of Respondents
35-40
9%
30-35
15%
20-25
55%
25-30
22%
2. Gender (1=Female, 2=Male)
5
Statistics
Gender
N Valid 100
Missing 0
Mean 1.6800
Median 2.0000
Mode 2.00
Gender
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid Female 32 32.0 32.0 32.0
Male 68 68.0 68.0 100.0
Total 100 100.0 100.0
3. Sector of work of respondents
Sector of Work
Software
Marketing
Development
Healthcare 7%
9% 7% Engineering
47%
Business
30%
Engineering Business Healthcare
Software Development Marketing
4. Frequency of exercise:
6
How many times a week do you exercise
N Valid 100
Missing 1
Mean 3.0600
Median 3.0000
Mode 2.00a
Std. Deviation 1.50299
Variance 2.259
Skewness .115
Std. Error of Skewness .241
Kurtosis -1.490
Std. Error of Kurtosis .478
5. Impact of health issues on work productivity
Std.
Minimu Maximu Deviatio Varianc
N Range m m Mean n e Skewness Kurtosis
Do you 100 4.00 1.00 5.00 3.8400 1.07045 1.146 -.732 .241 -.095 .478
think
performanc
e is affected
by health
issues
6. Whether the job is sedentary
The respondents were categorized into 2 groups:
7
a. Those who work out (Less than 30 minutes, 30-60 minutes, 1-2 hours and
more than 2 hours)
b. Those who do not (Selected No Workout as an option)
Percentage of Respondents
17%
83%
No Workout Workout
7. Descriptive statistics of respondents who do not work out:
Absenteeism (How often do you take an off)
Statistics Value
Mean 4.3125
Median 4
Mode 5
Kurtosis -0.64271
Skewness -0.53702
Standard Deviation 0.70415
8
Variance 0.4958
Alertness (Do you feel alert and focused at workplace)
Statistics Value
Mean 3.75
Median 4
Mode 4
Kurtosis -0.5920
Skewness 0.3584
Standard Deviation 0.6831
Variance 0.4667
Speed (Do you tend to complete your work within stipulated time)
Statistics Value
Mean 3.5
Median 4
Mode 4
Kurtosis 1.1074
Skewness -0.8299
Standard Deviation 1.0327
Variance 1.0667
Activeness (How active are you at your workplace)
Statistics Value
Mean 2.6875
Median 3
Mode 3
Kurtosis -0.4707
Skewness -0.3517
Standard Deviation 0.9464
Variance 0.8958
Stress (Do you feel you get stressed at your workplace)
Statistics Value
Mean 3.5625
Median 4
9
Mode 4
Kurtosis -0.2523
Skewness -0.8127
Standard Deviation 1.2093
Variance 1.4625
Diseases (Do you feel you get stressed at your workplace)
Statistics Value
Mean 3.5625
Median 4
Mode 4
Kurtosis -0.2523
Skewness -0.8127
Standard Deviation 1.2093
Variance 1.4625
8. Descriptive statistics of respondents who work out:
Absenteeism (How often do you take an off)
Statistics Value
Mean 4.2619
Median 4
Mode 5
Kurtosis 2.4635
Skewness -1.4523
Standard Deviation 0.8659
Variance 0.7498
Alertness (Do you feel alert and focused at workplace)
Statistics Value
Mean 3.797
Median 4
Mode 4
Kurtosis 0.9574
Skewness -0.6139
Standard Deviation 0.8033
Variance 0.6452
10
Speed (Do you tend to complete your work within stipulated time)
Statistics Value
Mean 4.095
Median 4
Mode 4
Kurtosis -0.464
Skewness -0.0764
Standard Deviation 0.6328
Variance 0.4004
Activeness (How active are you at your workplace)
Statistics Value
Mean 3.2142
Median 3
Mode 3
Kurtosis 1.2632
Skewness -0.4626
Standard Deviation 0.6026
Variance 0.3631
Stress (Do you feel you get stressed at your workplace)
Statistics Value
Mean 3.5476
Median 3
Mode 3
Kurtosis -0.3220
Skewness -0.1355
Standard Deviation 0.9867
Variance 0.9736
Diseases (Do you feel you get stressed at your workplace)
Statistics Value
Mean 1.7802
Median 2
Mode 2
11
Kurtosis 3.8299
Skewness -2.3956
Standard Deviation 0.3257
Variance 0.1061
9. Comparison of those who work out and those who do not
Absenteeism (How often do you take an off)
Statistic No Work Out Work out Interpretation
Mean 4.3125 4.2619
Median 4 4
Mode 5 5
Kurtosis -0.64271 2.4635
Skewness -0.53702 -1.4523
Standard 0.70415 0.8659
Deviation
Variance 0.4958 0.7498
Alertness (Do you feel alert and focused at workplace)
Statistic No Work Out Work out Interpretation
Mean 3.75 3.7976
Median 4 4
Mode 4 4
Kurtosis -0.5920 0.9574
Skewness 0.3584 -0.6139
Standard 0.6831 0.8033
Deviation
Variance 0.4667 0.6452
Speed (Do you tend to complete your work within stipulated time)
Statistic No Work Out Work out Interpretation
Mean 3.5 4.095
Median 4 4
Mode 4 4
Kurtosis 1.1074 -0.464
12
Skewness -0.8299 -0.0764
Standard 1.0327 0.6328
Deviation
Variance 1.0667 0.4004
Activeness (How active are you at your workplace)
Statistic No Work Out Work out Interpretation
Mean 2.687 3.2142
Median 3 3
Mode 3 3
Kurtosis -0.4707 1.2632
Skewness -0.3517 -0.4626
Standard 0.9464 0.6026
Deviation
Variance 0.8958 0.3631
Stress (Do you feel you get stressed at your workplace)
Statistic No Work Out Work out Interpretation
Mean 3.5625
Median 4
Mode 4
Kurtosis -0.2523
Skewness -0.8127
Standard 1.209
Deviation
Variance 1.4625
13
