Acta of Bioengineering and Biomechanics                                                                      Original paper
Vol. 16, No. 4, 2014                                                                       DOI: 10.5277/ABB-00041-2014-02
Finite element analysis of the percutaneous coronary intervention
                    in a coronary bifurcation
                         JAKUB KAROL BUKAŁA1*, JERZY MAŁACHOWSKI1, PIOTR KWIATKOWSKI2
               1
                Department of Mechanics and Applied Computer Science, Military University of Technology, Warsaw, Poland.
           2
               Clinical Department of Interventional Cardiology, Central Clinical Hospital Ministry of Interior, Warsaw, Poland.
     Purpose: The paper presents the process of numerical modeling and simulation of balloon angioplasty of the coronary artery using
Finite Element Method.
     Methods: The authors focused on the issue of applying adequate pressure in an arterial tissue during the post-dilatation process in the
“kissing balloon” stenting technique applied to patients with bifurcation stenosis. Despite great progress in the field of interventional
cardiology, angioplasty in bifurcations still belongs to the most difficult interventions, generally being less effective and more risky than
in the cases of straight stenosis.
     Results: During the modeling procedures and further simulations, the authors focused on mutual cooperation of non-compliant an-
gioplasty balloons and the coronary artery. The other goal was to develop a sufficiently accurate model of the coronary artery fragment,
including its bifurcation and angioplasty balloons; however, it was decided to ignore the modeling of coronary stents.
     Conclusions: The issue undertaken is considered as relatively complicated and complex but, in the authors’ opinion, the implemen-
tation of advanced computer aided engineering techniques may, in this case, answer several important questions without the need of
performing costly and aggravating in vivo tests.
Key words: angioplasty, balloon, FEA, kissing, simulation
                     1. Introduction                                        Understanding the causes of a miscarriage of the
                                                                        angioplasty according to the variety of the morpho-
                                                                        logical views of bifurcations, shape and anatomy of
    Incessant progress that can be observed enabled                     the left main lesions, with different diameters of the
invasive cardiologists to conduct the most difficult                    main artery according to the side branch, plaque loca-
procedures especially within the area of bifurcation –                  tion, length, extension, morphology and angulations
the place of the origin of the side branch from the                     of the side branch origin, make it possible to apply
main artery. It can be estimated that all of them con-                  a wide range of solutions that improve the effect of
stitute about 15–20% of all PTCA (Percutaneous                          PTCA [28].
Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty) procedures [14],                         Bifurcation angioplasty is a very complex proce-
[24]. There are lots of techniques (such as mini crush                  dure, which relates to the main and side branch. Un-
technique, culotte, or provisional T stenting) applied                  fortunately, despite the unceasing progress in inter-
to obtain the optimal, angiographic effect of the an-                   ventional cardiology especially in the range of the
gioplasty [9]. Therefore, special stents and angioplasty                accessibility to the new equipment and new improved
balloons were developed. Their peculiar shape and                       procedure techniques, outlying effects of the bifurca-
construction made them irreplaceable in the field of                    tion angioplasty are still unacceptable. It is worth
bifurcation angioplasty [25], [29].                                     pointing out that bifurcation angioplasty is one of the
______________________________
   * Corresponding author: Jakub Karol Bukała, Department of Mechanics and Applied Computer Science, Military University of
Technology, ul. gen. Sylwestra Kaliskiego 2, 00-908 Warsaw, Poland. Tel: +48 22 683 96 83, e-mail: jbukala@wat.edu.pl
   Received: April 16th, 2014
   Accepted for publication: April 21st, 2014
24                                                J.K. BUKAŁA et al.
most difficult and advanced procedures in the field of          It was decided that the initial model of the coro-
interventional cardiology [1], [31], [12].                  nary arteries will be obtained by Computed Tomogra-
    In the case of complications like restenosis or in      phy (CT) imaging. Unfortunately, the accuracy of CT
stent thrombosis, which are infrequent but still occur,     imaging depends strictly on the resolution of the ma-
reangioplasty might be a necessity. Stent thrombosis        chine. All these factors determined the fact that pre-
can lead to the MACE (Major Adverse Cardiac Event)          mapped geometry is further elaborated by Intravascu-
like death. Injury of the artery wall which activates       lar Ultrasound (IVUS) echo images.
a defensive response of the whole coronary system               CT images are monochrome and various shades of
may be caused by the usage of incorrect equipment or        gray correspond to the respective values of the radio-
false techniques according to the PTCA [22].                logical density in the Hounsfield scale [16]. An image
    Therefore, it seems to be crucial to conduct exten-     of the heart in a transverse plane with a marked place
sive studies in the field of biomedical engineering.        where the Left Coronary Artery (LCA) arises from the
Research may contribute to the development of a new         aorta is shown in Fig. 1. Finally, through interpolation
sophisticated appliance during conducting percutaneous      in three dimensions between separated masks in
interventions. The balance and cooperation between          Mimics®, a model of the left coronary artery with side
medical and engineering science efficiently influences      branches was created (Fig. 1).
progress in the methods of heart disease treatment. Thus,       Intravascular ultrasound images were used to ac-
it improves comfort and life expectancy of a number of      curately reproduce the geometry of artery walls. It
patients with the above mentioned problem.                  must also be added that IVUS survey is more reliable
    The literature review made by the authors sug-          and more conclusive than computed tomography im-
gests that there are no papers in which the modeling        aging when it comes to coronary arteries. Designated
methodology of balloon angioplasty of the coronary          cross sections were reproduced as accurately as possi-
artery using Finite Element Method is extensively           ble in CAE software in accordance with all measured
described. This fact and the remarks presented earlier      dimensions. Afterwards they were placed in the ap-
were a direct cause to undertake the issue described        propriate position of the geometry model obtained by
in the paper.                                               means of CT.
    The authors focused on the issue of mutual coop-            The profiles have been discretized in Altair Hyper
eration of two non-compliant angioplasty balloons and       Mesh software. At the outset, it was decided to opt out
the coronary artery during the post-dilatation process      of 8-node solid elements for 4-node shell elements for
in the “kissing balloon” stenting technique, applied to     the inner surface of the vessel. The result was a 44997
patients with bifurcation stenosis. The other goal was      4-node quad element (fully integrated shell element)
to develop a sufficiently accurate model of the coro-       model, based on 44765 nodes. The thickness of elements
nary artery fragment, including its bifurcation and         in the transverse direction was set at 0.7 [mm], an average
angioplasty balloons; however, it was decided to ig-        value for both the literature study and thickness specified
nore the modeling of coronary stents.                       in the IVUS survey [7], [8], [13], [16], [21], [23].
                                                                       2.2. Angioplasty non-compliant
       2. Materials and methods                                                balloon model
     2.1. Geometry and discrete model                           High pressure “non-compliant” balloons are made
                                                            of materials characterized by a very small susceptibil-
           of coronary bifurcation                          ity. They allow the shape to be maintained despite the
                                                            high pressure used to inflate. Balloons are made of
    Modeling the biological structures, in particular       “PET”-Polyethylene terephthalate and Nylon® [5].
soft tissues, is a high complexity problem (geometry,       The ideal balloons should be characterized by a very
material properties, etc.). In the paper, it was decided    thin, non-compliance layer, with high durability and
to create a sufficiently accurate model of the human        a small profile available in a wide range of length and
coronary artery fragment, including its actual geome-       diameter. It should be underlined that the shape
try and material parameters. It was necessary, how-         (sometimes complex) and the presence of special
ever, to introduce certain simplifications that were        coats on the balloon surface can be exerted during
imposed by restrictions of simulation methods and           planning and formation process of new models of the
available computing resources.                              balloons [5].
                      Finite element analysis of the percutaneous coronary intervention in a coronary bifurcation                 25
            Fig. 1. Subsequent stages of developing the discrete model of coronary artery fragment: (a) three-dimensional
      artery volume reconstruction based on CT (red circle marks the spot where left coronary artery (LCA) arises from aorta);
      (b) image of detailed cross sections from IVUS survey; (c) geometrical model of the inner surface of the coronary artery;
                                                (d) discrete model – 2D shell elements
    The process of developing the balloons geometry                  • inflated balloon diameter 2 [mm], compressed bal-
took several aspects into account:                                       loon diameter: 1 [mm]);
• the shape of the inflated balloon (a classic balloon               • side branch (body length: 10 [mm], total length:
    with a cylindrical body and a conical sharp end-                     15 [mm],
    ings was chosen);                                                • inflated balloon diameter 1,5 [mm], compressed
• the non-compliant balloon folded form (the com-                        balloon diameter: about 0.8 [mm]);
    mon three wings type);                                              Discretization of the main branch balloon and the
• shape (facing) of the inflated balloon in the coro-                side branch balloon was based on 47 250 and 35 000
    nary artery (particularly important in terms of lo-              4-node 2D shell elements, respectively. In both cases,
    cation of the two balloons within the vessel with-               the elements were formulated as fully integrated shell
    out initial collision).                                          elements, and they were given a thickness of 0.02 [mm].
    It was decided to model the balloon geometry in
a compressed form (as opposed to many works on
a similar topic, where the geometry of the compressed                            2.3. Constitutive modelling
balloon was pre-simulated from an inflated form [6],
[18]). After the analysis of the geometry fragment of                    There are numerous works on the material models
the coronary artery, the most appropriate dimensions                 and material constants of the coronary artery tissue
for the two balloons were chosen:                                    [7], [21], [26]. In the paper, the artery material was
• main branch (body length: 10 [mm], total length:                   based on a 5-parametric hyperelastic model, based on
    15 [mm],                                                         the strain energy density function according to the
26                                                                      J.K. BUKAŁA et al.
                                        Fig. 2. Geometrical model and finite element mesh of the proximal balloon:
                                      (a) cross sectional curve (generatrix), (b) balloon ending (conical sharp corner),
                                  (c) balloon body (cylindrical), (d) complete geometrical model of angioplasty balloon,
                                           (e) discrete model – 2D shell elements, (f) zoom on the balloon ending
                                   Table 1. Material hyperelastic (Mooney–Rivlin) constants for artery and plague [21]
                                                  Coronary artery                  Cellular plague                    Calcified plague
                     a10 [MPa]                       0.01890                         –0.088314                            –3.0254
                     a01 [MPa]                       0.00275                          0.10619                              3.1073
                     a20 [MPa]                       0.59042                          0.11373                              107.39
                     a11 [MPa]                       0.85718                          0.89382                              –234.7
                     a02 [MPa]                          0                            –0.96676                              137.22
theory of Mooney–Rivlin, with the material constants                                    With the 5-parameter M–R model [16]:
experimentally obtained by Prendergast and his team
[21]. These values are cited in many papers concern-                                                 n
ing similar problems [4], [6], [8].                                                       W=     ∑a
                                                                                                p,q =0
                                                                                                         10 ( I1   − 3) + a01 ( I 2 − 3) + a20 ( I1 − 3) 2
                                         ⎡ g ⎤
    The density of the material was 1.1 ⎢ 3 ⎥ , Pois-
                                         ⎣ cm ⎦                                                  + a11 ( I1 − 3)( I 2 − 3) + a02 ( I 2 − 3) 2 .              (2)
son’s ratio: v = 0.45 [–]. The equations for the strain
energy density function of the material are shown                                      The balloon material model was, as in much of
below [15]                                                                          the related research [4], [6], a classical one based
                           n                                                        on Hooke’s theory of elasticity with Young’s
W ( J1 , J 2 , J n ) =   ∑C
                         p ,q=0
                                  pq ( J1   − 3) p ( J 2 − 3) q + WH ( J ) . (1)    modulus E = 900 [MPa] and Poisson’s ratio v =
                                                                                    0.3 [–].
                     Finite element analysis of the percutaneous coronary intervention in a coronary bifurcation          27
          2.4. Boundary conditions                                  computing machine, number of unknowns and the
                                                                    lowest stiffness of elements that are currently in con-
                                                                    tact or in relation to the masses of bodies remaining in
    For the simulation considered was supposed to be                contact using a weight functions [30].
calculated numerically using the implicit method, all                  The load was applied as the function of pressure
the boundary nodes, both from the artery and the bal-               on the inner surface of the two balloons in accor-
loons, have to be constrained in all possible degrees of            dance with given function curves, which are shown
freedom (three translational directions and three rota-             in Fig. 3.
tional directions).
    The mechanism of contact between the surfaces of
the two balloons and the inner wall of the coronary                                 2.5. Implicit method
artery was defined by a penalty formulation method                                – simulation parameters
(potential areas of contact, indicating the penetrated
and penetrating bodies were specified). Optional con-
                                                                        FEA in static applications is based on the follow-
tact parameters and additional features were used
                                                                    ing matrix equation:
(e.g., small penetration in contact search option, soft
constraint formulation, initial penetration check and                                         [ K ]{U } = {F }           (4)
the IGAP parameter, where the stiffness is not added
instantaneously but ramped up to 100% over a certain                where: [K] – global stiffness matrix of the system
number of iterations) to improve the convergence of                 (construction stiffness), the sum of the stiffness matri-
the calculation (implicit methods generate more                     ces of individual elements, {U} – single-column ma-
problems for the contact mechanism than explicit                    trix of the displacements of all nodes, {F} – single-
integration methods).                                               column matrix of the loads applied to the nodes of the
    In this case, the contact mechanism was accom-                  structure [2].
plished using the penalty formulation in relation to the                Due to the nature of the simulations prepared (high
normal displacement. To the basic FEM system of                     nonlinearity while preserving static nature of the is-
equations, based on a stationary functional that repre-             sue) it was decided to use the implicit method, spe-
sents the sum of the internal energy (deformation of                cifically the iterative Newton–Raphson scheme. It is
the body) and the potential energy of the external                  a very common method, due to the versatility of its
load, a fictional equation of energy in the form of the             applications and high accuracy of calculations. In each
penalty function is added [15]:                                     iterative cycle, the full load R is used. In particular
                                                                    cycles, constant, approximate stiffness matrices are
           π (u ) = κ [( Bu − gN )T ( Bu − gN )]            (3)     assumed, which results in failure to fulfil equilibrium
                                                                    conditions. After each cycle an unbalanced load is ac-
where u describes the global displacement vector, and               quired in a particular configuration of the deformation.
κ is the stiffness of fictitious spring element acting              This load is used to determine the additional displace-
between two nodes which are in contact. The value of                ments, which aim at changing the configuration corre-
the parameter κ is determined by the accuracy of the                sponding to the equilibrium configuration [2]:
                           Fig. 3. Functions of the applied pressure throughout the deployment process
28                                                    J.K. BUKAŁA et al.
                  Δr (i +1) = ( KT(i ) ) −1 ΔR (i )      (5)    applied to both balloons p = 1.5 [atm], the full infla-
                                                                tion), is shown in Fig. 4. The coronary artery fragment
where Δr(i+1) – increment of displacements in the tran-         is shown in a cross section in order to show the bal-
sition from state i to i + 1, KT – the tangential (ap-          loons inside.
proximate) stiffness matrix, ΔR(i) – unbalanced load
(ΔR(1)) = R – F(1)).
    The nonlinear numerical solver with BFGS up-
dates (Broyden–Fletcher–Goldfarb–Shanno algo-
rithm), which is the default LS-Dyna solver for non-
linear static analysis, was used. The relative energy
and the relative translational displacements of the
system were applied as convergence parameters.
Automatic time step selection, depending on the num-
ber of iterations performed in the previous time step,
was defined, which allowed computation time to be
shortened and significantly increased the numerical
convergence.
    Calculations were performed using LSTC LS-Dyna
solver. This numerical code is a comprehensive,
highly advanced tool for non-linear physical simula-
tions developed by Livermore Software Technology
Corporation. It applies the finite element approach and
the main mechanism is an explicit integration of dy-
namic equations of motion.
                      3. Results
          3.1. Simulated procedures
    Basic analysis involved simultaneous inflation of
both balloons in the modeled fragment of the coronary
artery. That is, using some simplifications, an identi-
cal process to the “balloon kissing” technique for
coronary balloon angioplasty. It is a procedure de-
signed for percutaneous angioplasty of coronary arte-
rial bifurcations, which uses simultaneous inflation of
two balloons. One of them is placed in the main
branch while the other one is placed partially in the
main branch and partially in the side branch. The
proximal parts of both balloons touch each other,
while the distal parts lay separately [3].
             3.2. Numerical results
                                                                           Fig. 4. Simulation of the kissing balloon technique
                                                                                          in subsequent stages
    A deformed shape of the structure studied in four
stages – successively at times: t = 0 [–] (input structure),        The deformed shape of the analyzed structure with
t = 0.2 [–] (pressure applied to balloons p = 0.1 [atm],        applied equivalent tension fringe by the HMH hy-
initial inflation), t = 0.5 [–] (pressure applied to            pothesis (von Mises stress) in four stages – succes-
proximal balloon = 1.5 [atm]) and t = 1.0 [–] (pressure         sively at times: t = 0 [–] (input structure); t = 0.2 [–]
                       Finite element analysis of the percutaneous coronary intervention in a coronary bifurcation          29
(pressure applied to balloons p = 0.1 [atm], initial infla-                                 4. Discussion
tion); t = 0.5 [–] (pressure applied to proximal balloon
= 1.5 [atm]) and t = 1.0 [–] (pressure applied to both bal-
loons p = 1.5 [atm], the full inflation, is shown in Fig. 5.              Computer Aided Engineering (CAE) is a branch of
                                                                      technical expertise which appears to be especially
                                                                      useful in biomedical engineering. In particular, analy-
                                                                      sis performed using various numerical methods [17],
                                                                      [27]. An advanced finite element approach enables
                                                                      simulation of nonlinear problems, characterized by
                                                                      high displacements and deformations, nonlinear mate-
                                                                      rial properties and sophisticated contact mechanisms.
                                                                      The relatively low cost of such research methods
                                                                      compared to experiments in vivo (Latin for ‘within the
                                                                      living’) should also be noted [11]. The applied meth-
                                                                      ods also allow determination of values which, using
                                                                      empirical tests, would be extremely difficult or even
                                                                      impossible to obtain (e.g., the stress or strain rate in
                                                                      specific areas of the model).
                                                                          Numerical investigations of the inflation process of
                                                                      angioplasty balloons and stents in the coronary arteries
                                                                      using Finite Element Analysis (FEA) were performed
                                                                      on several occasions and it is impossible to mention
                                                                      them all in this short paper. Many of them tackle the
                                                                      major problem of stress distribution in the artery tissue
                                                                      caused by the inflating balloons and stent surfaces [8],
                                                                      [13], [20], [21]. These articles compare amongst others:
                                                                      various stenting techniques, different types of coronary
                                                                      stents [21] or semi-compliant and non-compliant bal-
                                                                      loons [23]. Additionally, paper [8] presents the distri-
                                                                      bution of stress compounds in the artery and the emer-
                                                                      gence of restenosis. Moreover, a numerical analysis of
                                                                      blood flow in the stenosed vessel has been performed
                                                                      [10]. An example of modeling the coronary artery
                                                                      fragment, based on intravascular echo images, can be
                                                                      found in paper [19]. There is also a separate group of
                                                                      papers that describe research on the effects of the ap-
                                                                      plied load on the resulting deformation and stress in the
                                                                      balloon–coronary stent–coronary artery configuration
                                                                      [4], [6]. A certain group of research simulations re-
                                                                      garding PTCA surgery in the area of bifurcation [18]
                                                                      focused more on aspect of coronary stents.
                                                                          The applied methods of data processing led to the
         Fig. 5. Arterial wall stress fringes (von Mises)             development of the coronary artery fragment model,
                in the kissing procedure inflation                    including the arterial bifurcation section. Formed as
                                                                      an actual representation of the geometry of a particu-
    An equivalent tension graph (HMH hypothesis)                      lar patient’s vessel, it may be successfully used as
for a selected finite element of the coronary artery                  generalization of the artery bifurcation due to suffi-
fragment (where intensive balloon contact occurred)                   ciently reproducible linear and angular ratios in whole
versus the pressure applied on balloons throughout the                population.
deployment process is shown in Fig. 6.                                    The process of modeling and simulation of angio-
    An issue of applying adequate pressure in the arterial            plasty non-compliance balloons should be regarded as
tissue is shown as a graph of relative change for the se-             a success. Numerical simulations presented, in a satis-
lected characteristic artery cross sections area, Fig. 7.             factory manner, the mechanism of the balloons infla-
30                                                      J.K. BUKAŁA et al.
                    Fig. 6. Equivalent stress (von Mises) in the selected finite element of the coronary artery
                               vs. pressure applied in balloons throughout the deployment process
                    Fig. 7. Relative cross sectional area/time plot for selected sections of the coronary artery
tion and the way the pressure was applied to the vessel                 In the authors’ opinion, concepts presented in the
walls, confirming most of their advantages (the ability             paper and the analysis performed do not exhaust the
to maintain a predetermined shape and, therefore, to                topic described and are the basis for further research and
reduce the possibility of damaging the artery).                     development in this area. The authors are absolutely
    Measurements of the pressure applied to the                     convinced that the elaborated and presented modeling
coronary vessel walls, illustrated in the graph pre-                methodology can be extended with case studies of dif-
sented in Fig. 7, as the relative change in the spe-                ferent arteries conditions (certain disease states, etc.) or
cific area of cross-sections, confirm one of the main               various equipment configurations. A reference system,
disadvantages of the “kissing balloons” method.                     in which the results from different arrangements could
Excessive pressure applied to the vessel walls                      be compared, was developed. Further research, based
is visible in the proximal region of the two cooper-                on the methodology presented, may lead to valuable
ating balloons when relatively low pressure act on                  insights and specific applications capable of improv-
the proper stenosis (side branch balloon, distal sec-               ing the conditions and specifications of coronary an-
tion).                                                              gioplasty procedures.
                          Finite element analysis of the percutaneous coronary intervention in a coronary bifurcation                       31
    Further works in the presented field are currently                    [14] LESIAK M., Stentowanie bifurkacji tetnic wie}cowych. Część
being investigated by the authors in cooperation with                          I. Dwa naczynia, jeden stent, Post. Kardiol. Interw., 2009,
                                                                               4(18), 201–207.
the medical staff.                                                        [15] Livermore Software Technology Corporation, Ls-Dyna®
                                                                               Keyword Userąs Manual, Vol. II, 2012, version 971, 336.
                    Acknowledgements                                      [16] MAH P., REEVES T.E., MCDAVID W.D., Deriving Hounsfield
                                                                               units using grey levels in cone beam computed tomography,
    The study has been supported by the PARP within project No.                Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, 2010, 39, 323–335.
UDA-POIG.05.01.00-00-013/12-00. This support is gratefully                [17] MILENIN A., KOPERNIK M., Multiscale FEM model of artifi-
acknowledged.                                                                  cial heart chamber composed of nanocoatings, Acta of Bio-
                                                                               engineering and Biomechanics, 2009, 11(2), 13–20.
                                                                          [18] MORTIER P., DE BEULE M., DUBINI G., HIKICHI Y.,
                           References                                          MURASATO Y., ORMISTON J.A., Coronary bifurcation stent-
                                                                               ing: insights from in vitro and virtual bench testing, Euro
 [1] AL SUWAIDI J., BERGER P.B., RIHAL C.S. et al., Immediate                  Intervention Supplement, 2010, Vol. 6, J53–J60.
     and longterm outcome of intracoronary stent implantation             [19] OHAYON J., FINET G., TREYVE F., RIOUFOL G., DUBREUIL O.,
     for true bifurcation lesions, J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., 2000, 35,            A three-dimensional finite element analysis of stress distri-
     929–936.                                                                  bution in a coronary atherosclerotic plaque: In-vivo predic-
 [2] BELYTSCHKO T., LIU W.K., MORAN B., Nonlinear Finite                       tion of plaque rupture location, Biomechanics Applied to
     Elements for Continua and Structures, John Wiley & Sons,                  Computer Assisted Surgery, 2005, 225–241.
     LTD, England, 2000.                                                  [20] PASZENDA Z., MARCINIAK J., Biomechanical characteristics
 [3] BRUECK M., SCHEINERT D., FLACHSKAMPF F.A., DANIEL W.G.,                   of the stent-coronary vessel system, Acta of Bioengineering
     LUDWIG J., Sequential vs. kissing balloon angioplasty for                 and Biomechanics, 2002, 4(1), 81–89.
     stenting of bifurcation coronary lesions, Catheter Cardio-           [21] PRENDERGAST P.J., LALLY C., DALY S., REID A.J. et al.,
     vasc. Interv., 2002, 55(4), 461–466.                                      Analysis of Prolapse in Cardiovascular Stents: A Constitu-
 [4] DE BEULEA M., MORTIER P., CARLIERC S.G., VERHEGGHED                       tive Equation for Vascular Tissue and Finite-Element Mod-
     B., VAN IMPERA R., VERDONCKB P., Realistic finite element-                elling, Journal of Biomechanical Engineering, 2003, 125,
     based stent design: The impact of balloon folding, Journal of             699.
     Biomechanics, 2008, 41, 383–389.                                     [22] ROGERS C., PARIKH S., SEIFERT P., EDELMAN E.R., Endoge-
 [5] GARRAMONE S., Structure – Property Relationships in An-                   nous cell seeding: Remnant endothelium after stenting en-
     gioplasty Balloons, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, May                  hances vascular repair, Circulation, 1996, 11, 2909–2914.
     2001.                                                                [23] SCHIEVANO S., KUNZELMAN K., NICOSIA M.A., COCHRAN R.P.,
 [6] GERVASO F., CAPELLI C., PETRINI L., LATTANZIO S.,                         EINSTEIN D.R., KHAMBADKONE S., BONHOEFFER P., Percuta-
     DI VIRGILIO L., MIGLIAVACCA F., On the effects of different               neous Mitral Valve Dilatation: Single Balloon versus Double
     strategies in modelling balloon-expandable stenting by                    Balloon. A Finite Element Study, The Journal of Heart Valve
     means of finite element method, Journal of Biomechanics,                  Disease, 2009, 18, 28–34.
     2008, 41, 1206–1212.                                                 [24] SERRUYS P., MORICE M.C., KAPPETEIN A.P. et al., Percuta-
 [7] HOLZAPFEL G.A., SOMMER G., GASSER C.T., REGITNIG P.,                      neous coronary intervention versus coronary-artery bypass
     Determination of layer-specific mechanical properties of                  grafting for severe coronary artery disease, N. Engl. J. Med.,
     human coronary arteries with nonatherosclerotic intimal                   2009, 360, 961–972.
     thickening and related constitutive modeling, Am. J. Physiol.        [25] SHAO-LIANG C., IMAD S., Bifurcation Stents Strategy, Nan-
     Heart Circ. Physiol., 2005, 289, H2048–H2058.                             jing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Division of
 [8] HYRE M.R., PULLIAM R.M., SQUIRE J.C., Prediction of stent                 Cardiology, University of Turin.
     endflare, arterial stresses and flow patterns in a stenotic artery   [26] SIDOROV S., Finite Element Modeling of Human Artery
     [Internet], Department of Mechanical Engineering, Virginia                Tissue with a Nonlinear Multi-Mechanism in Elastic Mate-
     Military Institute, USA.                                                  rial, Dissertation, University of Pittsburgh, 2007.
 [9] IAKOVOU I., COLOMBO A., Two-Stent Techniques for the                 [27] TYNDYK M.A., BARRON V., MCHUGH P.E., O’MAHONEZ D.,
     Treatment of Coronary Bifurcations with Drug-Eluting                      Generation of a finite element model of the thoracolumbar spine,
     Stents, Hell J. Cardiol., 2005, 46, 188–198.                              Acta of Bioengineering and Biomechanics, 2007, 9(1), 35–46.
[10] JODKO D., OBIDOWSKI D., REOROWICY P., JÓŹWIK K., Simu-               [28] VASSILEV D., GIL R.J., Changes in coronary bifurcations
     lations of the blood flow in the arterio-venous fistula for               after stent placement in the main vessel and balloon opening
     haemodialysis, Acta of Bioengineering and Biomechanics,                   of stent cell- theory and practical verification on bench – test
     2014, 16(1), 69–74.                                                       model, J. Geriatr. Cardiol., 2008, 5(1), 43–49.
[11] KLUESS D., WIEDING J., SOUFFRANT R., MITTELMEIER W.,                 [29] VERHEYE S., GRUBE E., RAMCHARITAR S., SCHOFER J.J. et al.,
     BADER R., Finite Element Analysis in Orthopaedic Biome-                   First-in-man (FIM) study of the Stentys bifurcation stent
     chanics [Internet], University of Rostock, Department of                  – 30 days results, EuroIntervention, 2009, 4(5), 566–571.
     Orthopaedics Rostock, Germany.                                       [30] VULOVIC S., ZIVKOVIC M., GRUJOVIC N., SLAVKOVIC R.,
[12] KWIATKOWSKI P., GIL R.J., Angioplastyka z implantacją                     A comparative study of contact problems solution based on the
     stentów – powikłania, metody ich unikania i perspektywy le-               penalty and Lagrange multiplier approaches, J. Serbian Soci-
     czenia, Ogólnopolski Przegląd Medyczny, 2012, 4.                          ety for Computational Mechanics, 2007, 1(1), 174–183.
[13] LALLY C., DOLAN F., PRENDERGAST P.J., Cardiovascular                 [31] YAMASHITA T., NISHIDA T., ADAMIAN M.G. et al., Bifurcation
     stent design and vessel stresses: a finite element analysis,              lesions: two stents versus one stent – immediate and follow
     Journal of Biomechanics, 2005, 38, 1574.                                  – up results, J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., 2000, 35, 1145–1151.