Hydrochemical and Statistical Characterization of Basement Aquifer Groundwater in The Extreme Northern Togo
Hydrochemical and Statistical Characterization of Basement Aquifer Groundwater in The Extreme Northern Togo
ABSTRACT: About two third of the population in the North of Togo lives in rural and semi-rural areas,
depends on groundwater for drinking, for domestic and agricultural uses. Hydrochemical and statistical methods
investigation are carried out on the groundwater of the basement aquifer system in the North of Togo in order to
determine the mineralization water process. Chemical analysis were made at Laboratory of Water Chemistry
(LCE) at University of Lomé according to AFNOR methods. The quality of groundwater has been conducted by
using multivariate statistical and spatial analyses. Major chemical elements show that this aquifer system is
composed by fresh water dominated by the Ca-Mg-HCO3 and Ca-HCO3 water types (about 93%). According to
hydrochemical and multivariate statistical analysis, groundwater mineralization is caused by the silicates
weathering related to the residence time of water in the aquifer, anthropogenic activities in urban environment
and agricultural area, soil CO2 diffusion and cation exchange process.
Keywords:- Birrimian aquifer, Hydrochemical, multivariate statistical analysis, mineralization water process.
                                         I.       INTRODUCTION
         On a global scale, about two third of the population in the Savannas region in Togo, lives in rural and
semi-rural areas, depends on groundwater for drinking and for domestic uses [1]. Surface water is easily
accessible, but they are subject to increasing pollution and a significant temporal and seasonal variation in their
quantity. Unlike surface water, groundwater has the advantage of being less exposed to pollution, being
available near demand points and having a quantity that varies little with the seasons [2]. This supplying point
once of good quality, is currently threatened by various points and diffuse sources of contamination [3]. It is the
main source of water supply for people in the Savannah region of Togo, given the occasional drying up of
traditional water points (backwaters, springs and traditional wells) following the effects of climate change.
         Indeed, Togo is a small country in West Africa covering an area of 56,600 km2. It is divided into five
major economic regions, the fifth region being the Savannah region located in the extreme north of the country.
The study area is located in the Savannah region, which is bordered in the North by Burkina Faso, in the South
by the Kara region, in the West by Ghana and in the East by Republic of Benin. The rate of drinking water
supply in the region in 2007 was estimated at 16.6% in rural and semi-rural areas, 44.2% in urban areas with an
average of 24.7% [1]. In front of this shortage, the Togolese State, with the help of a few donors, initiated a
national program of village hydraulics throughout the Savannah region, the objective of which was to supply
drinking water in all areas of the country, sub-prefectures and more generally in all urban, peri-urban and rural
areas of the region [4]. This program has made it possible to build several water points in villages only from
groundwater. Nowadays, no study has been done in order to characterize these waters qualitatively and
quantitatively.
         At the national level, the works carried out concerned the coastal sedimentary basin and the few works
done in the basement are those of [5] (in plateau region) and [6] (in Kara region ). The study done on the
Birrimian basement of the Savannah region by [7] focused on a mathematical model of the structure and
functioning of the exploited basement aquifer. This study shows that the overall rainfall shortage since 1970,
and which increased from 1983 to 1985, resulted in a decrease in annual recharge for these three years. The
present study aimed to determine the hydrogeochemical characteristics of groundwater of the basement aquifer
in northwestern Togo for domestic use. Specifically, the study focused on determining the quality of
groundwater, the processes influencing this quality, the chemical facies and the influence of geological
formations on the water resources, to monitor the spatial evolution of physicochemical parameters.
were carried out with software XL-STAT 2007. The values of the parameters were compared with the World
Health Organization [13] value guides for drinking water. The values of the ionic balance characterizing the
samples taken within the framework of this study are all lower than 5% reflecting the good quality of the
analysis carried out.
- Major Cations
         The calcium contents range from 4 mg/L to 156 mg/L with an average of 31.2 mg/L. While the values
of magnesium obtained vary between 0.72 mg/L and 79.2 mg/L with an average of 13.3 mg/L. The water
hardness is an indicator of the limestone level in water: it corresponds to its calcium content and magnesium.
The more it contains some, the more it is "hard". As a whole, these results thus reveal that water is in extreme
cases soft and fairly hard. Hard water of tendency is water of boreholes: FP1 (72 °F), FP6 (33 °F) and FP8
(32°F). Sodium presents contents ranges from 0.8 mg/L to 114 mg/L for an average value of 22.1 mg/L. The
values of potassium, just like sodium are very low. Potassium vary between 0.5 mg/L and 36 mg/L, for an
average of 3.18 mg/L.
- Major Anions
         Just like the cations, the anions exist with low dose in the majority of sampled water of this study.
Except the bicarbonates (HCO3-) which post the highest contents in the water samples. These contents vary from
12.2 mg/L to 414.8mg/L with an average about 181.8 mg/L. More than 50% of the water points have a content
bicarbonates higher than the average value. The recorded chloride rates are very low and vary between 0 mg/L
and 215.2 mg/L, with an average of 11.86 mg/L. This standard deviation shows a great variability of the
contents point chlorides from one point to another. The sulphates contents range from 0.3 mg/L (in 32
observations is 43.2 % of the total staff complement) to 80.9 mg/L in FP1, with an average of 4.98mg/L.
Figure 5: Piper Diagram showing the hydrochemical compositions of groundwater and surface water
          The factor F1, with an expressed variance of 57.59%, is the most significant follow-up of the factors F2
and F3, with respectively 12.61% and 10.03% of the original variance. The first two factors translate the main
part of required information and make it possible significantly to represent the essential part of the observations
and the variables expressed about 70.2%.
         Table 5 presents the contribution of the various variables in the definition of the principal factors. This
table shows that the factor F1, is defined by electrical conductivity EC (r=0.986), calcium (r=0.903), magnesium
(0.891), sodium (0.932), sulphates SO42- (R = 0.928), nitrates NO3- (r=0.84), and chlorides Cl- (r=0.891). Thus
the axis F1 (57.59%) represented the phenomenon of mineralization by hydrolysis but also expresses an
anthropic effect (correlation between F1 and NO3-, Cl- and SO42-) due to pollution.
         The connection existing between all the variables taken two by two and the coefficients of correlation
between these various variables are given by the matrix of correlation (Table 6). While being based on the
coefficient of correlation r=0.64 [14] criticizes, a test of correlation of the various studied parameters
highlighted a close connection between Ca2+, Mg2+, Na+ SO42-, Cl-, NO3- and electrical conductivity. This
relation results in the coefficients of correlation approaching "1". Taking into consideration this table, one can
make several noticed:
        A good correlation between conductivity and Ca2+ (0.94), Mg2+ (0.924), Na+ (0.808), SO42- (0.864), Cl-
         (0.874) and NO3- (0.804).
        A discrete correlation between the bicarbonates, Ca2+ and Mg2+; like between calcium and the anions
         (NO3-, SO42- and Cl-) then between Mg2+ and these some anions.
         The Factor F2 which explains 12.61% of the total inertia of the points representative of the
observations and determined by the HCO3- (r=0,796). This plan highlights the surface exchange which proceeds
between water and CO2 biogenic.
Table 6: Pearson correlation among physicochemical properties in Birrimian basement aquifer p< 0.05 starting
from a table of contingency
Variables   Cond        pH                    HCO3-     Ca2+     Mg2+      Na+       K+            NO3-     Cl-         SO4      SiO2
Cond        1
pH          0.099       1
HCO3-       0.617       0.126                 1
Ca          0.940       0.023                 0.671     1
Mg          0.924       0.039                 0.626     0.899    1
Na          0.808       0.251                 0.497     0.619    0.585     1
K           0.452       -0.026                0.064     0.296    0.299     0.562     1
NO3-        0.804       0.029                 0.078     0.727    0.738     0.569     0.334         1
Cl-         0.874       0.041                 0.187     0.762    0.782     0.716     0.613         0.905    1
SO42-       0.864       0.085                 0.207     0.746    0.737     0.763     0.601         0.868    0.962       1
SiO2        -0.222      0.104                 -0.159    -0.234   -0.114    -0.266    -0.184        -0.119   -0.187      -0.269   1
The projection of observations in the factorial design F1xF2 shows that we can subdivide the points of
measurement into three groups (Figure 7):
        First group (Boreholes: FP1, FP6, FP8) which accounts for 4.22% of the sampled points. They are the
boreholes with high mineralization controlled by a pollution more specifically as these boreholes are located in
full urban environment.
        Second Group: constituted by the boreholes and wells fairly to slightly mineralization and
characterized by a mineralization due to the residence time.
0.75 HCO3
                                     0.5
                                                                                               Mg
                                                                                    pH         Ca
                                0.25
                      F2 (12,61 %)
                                                                                                Cond
                                                                    SiO2                       Na
                                       0
                             -0.25                                                             SO4
                                                                                               NO3
                                     -0.5                                                 Cl       K
                             -0.75
                                      -1
                                            -1 -0.75 -0.5 -0.25 0 0.25 0.5 0.75                1
                                                             F1 (57,59 %)
                                                 Groupe 2
                                     5
                      F2 (12,61 %)
                                                                F29
                                                                 FP4
                                                                  F87
                                                                 F66
                                                                F35
                                                            F19F83
                                                               F49
                                                             F31                              Groupe 1
                                                       F72
                                                        F30
                                                        F2  F51F91
                                                             F67 F32
                                                       F73
                                                       FP2
                                                     F26
                                                     FP3
                                                       F54  F47
                                                        F82F89
                                                       F81
                                                       F69  F43
                                                             F78
                                                            F28
                                                       F25 F88
                                                      F74
                                                      F23
                                                      F64
                                                      F50     F8
                                                              F75            FP6
                                     0
                                                     F84
                                                     F3
                                                    F61
                                                     F52
                                                    P2            F37
                                                  F71
                                                  F57
                                                  F90
                                                 ES1
                                                 F5   F7
                                                     F46F68
                                                       F79
                                                      F16
                                                 F56
                                                F53
                                                  F48
                                                 F80
                                                 ES3
                                                 F11               F63                           FP1
                                                F86F85
                                                 F77
                                                FP5P1 F39
                                                ES2
                                               P3
                                     -5                                                 FP8
                                          -5              0              5         10           15       20
F1 (57,59 %)
Figure 7: Projection of the points of measurement of groundwater on the factorial design F1xF2
-0.06049
0.13951
                           0.33951
              Similarité
0.53951
0.73951
                           0.93951
                                         HCO3
                                                              Cond
                                                         Mg
                                                                                Cl
                                                    Na
                                                                     Ca
                                                K
NO3
                                                                                           pH
                                                                                     SO4
                                                                                                SiO2
                           Fig 8: Dendrogram of the physicochemical parameters of groundwater
         120                                                                   45
                                          Surface water                                            Surface water
                                                                               40
         100                              Well water                                               Well water
                                                                               35
                                          Borehole water                                           Borehole water
             80                                                                30
Ca en mg/L
                                                                 Na en mg/L
                                                                               25
             60
                                                                               20
             40                                                                15
             20                                                                10
                                                                               5
              0
                                                                               0
                  0                 50                 100
                                                                                    0   50        100            150
                               SiO2 en mg/L                                             SiO2 en mg/L
        120                                                                450
                                                                                                        Surface water
                                                                           400
        100                                                                                             Well water
                                                                           350
                                                                HCO3 en mg/L
                                                                           250
             60
                                                                           200
             40                               Surface water                150
                                              Well water                   100
             20
                                              Borehole water                   50
             0                                                                  0
                  0                 20                     40                       0   50         100               150
                               SiO2 en mg/L                                              SiO2 en mg/L
Figure 9: Relationship between the contents Ca2+, Mg2+, Na+ and HCO3- with silica.
Figure 10 shows the relationship between [Ca2++Mg2+] and [SO42-+HCO3-]. This Figure shows that most of the
groundwater samples and surface water samples are plot below and along the y= x line due to excess of
bicarbonates as only eight samples representing 11% were found to be above the aquiline. This Figure indicates
that silicate weathering is the main source of sodium and bicarbonate and it exerts major control on groundwater
and surface water in the study area.
                                            16
                                                          Surface water
                                            14            Well water
                                            12            Borehole water
                                                          Y=X
                            [Ca+Mg] meq/L
10
                                             6             Carbonate
                                                           weathering
                                             4
                                                                                                         Silicate
                                             2                                                           weathering
                                             0
                                                 0                2              4                             6
                                                                        [HCO3+SO4] meq/L
                                                 Figure 10: Relationship between [Ca+Mg] and [HCO3 +SO4]
Na en mg/L
        40                                                                            60
                                                                                      50
        30                                                                            40
        20                                                                            30
                                                                                      20
        10
                                                                                      10
              0                                                                        0
                  0       100                 200    300  400             500                0   100     200       300   400      500
                                             HCO3 en mg/L                                              HCO3 en mg/L
     40                                                                             14
                                                                                                                  Borehole
     35                                                                             12                            water
                                                                                                                  Surface
     30                                                                             10                            water
 Mg en mg/L
     25
                                                                                          8
                                                                              K en mg/L
     20
                                                                                          6
     15                                             Borehole
                                                    water                                 4
     10
                                                    Surface                               2
              5                                     water
              0                                                                           0
                  0          100      200    300    400        500                            0   200       400             600
                                     HCO3 en mg/L                                                  HCO3 en mg/L
Figure 11: Relationship between Ca2+, Mg2+, Na+, K+ and HCO3- in groundwater of the study area.
-4 -4
-5 -5
-6 -6
2 2
1 1
0 0
                                                                       Is Aragonite
                        0              5          10              15                        0      5          10             15
 Is Calcite
-1 -1
         -2                                                                           -2
                                                 Borehole water                                             Borehole water
         -3                                                                           -3
                                                 Surface water                                              Surface water
         -4                                      Well water                           -4
                                                                                                            Well water
         -5                                                                           -5
                                    [Ca + HCO3] en méq/L                                          [Ca+HCO3] en meq/L
              -2
                                                                                            -8
                                                                             Is Halite
              -4                                                                         -8.5
                                                 Borehole water                             -9
              -6                                                                                           Borehole water
                                                 Surface water                           -9.5
              -8                                                                           -10             Surface water
                                                 Well water
                                                                                      -10.5                Well water
       -10
                                                                                           -11
                                 [Ca+Mg+HCO3] en meq/L
Figure 12: Index of saturation of water with respect to carbonated and evaporitic minerals
                                                                           9
                                                                                        Borehole water
                                                                           7            Surface water
              [Ca+Mg-HCO3-SO4] in meq/L
                                                                                        Well water
                                                                           5
-7 -5 -3 -1-1 1 3 5 7
-3
                                                                          -5
                                               [Na + K - Cl-] in meq/L
                                                                          -7
Figure 13: Description of the basic exchanges with clayey minerals in the aquifers
III.2- Discussion
          The analysis of basement aquifer groundwater in the north Togo (Dapaong) shows that the temperature
ranges from 27.4 to 30.1°C with a mean temperature about 28.4°C. These results are close to those of [18] in
Burkina Faso in the basement aquifer, where the temperature is in general very close to the average atmospheric
values (28 with 32° C) for well water and (28 with 34° C) for boreholes water [18]. The values of the
temperature reflect as well the ambient temperature at the time of the collection of the samples as the climate of
the season. That confirms the influence of the climate on the groundwater resources with low depth in the area.
At this level, groundwater is more influenced by the seasonal variations of the temperature of the atmospheric
air [19].
          The values of pH recorded during the sampling campaign vary from 5.68 to 8.88 with an average of
7.34 thus close to neutrality. This trend to neutrality in the aquifers is due to the consumption of CO2 following
the weathering of silicates involving the increase in the alkalinity (HCO3- of water [20]. These values are rather
homogeneous (low CV) and vary independently of the aquifers collected. They probably do not showing clearly
the variation because of the interference of several geochemical processes (dissolution, reduction, oxidation...)
with the mixture between water of the alterites and that of the fractured basement.
          The alkalinity of water is connected to the pH system, and these two parameters make it possible to
calculate the pressure partial of balancing CO2. The values of log(pCO2) vary little and evolve/move around
0,03 atm (logpCO 2 = - 1.5 atm). According to Mbonu (1991) , this value is frequently associated the
atmosphere of the ground; what let think that it is about a contribution of CO2 in opened conditions system on
an unlimited gas tank which is the atmosphere of the ground. The values of the log(pCO2) characterizing
groundwater and surface water of the study area, vary largely between -2,78 and -0,18 with an average of about
-1.41. The values which exceed those of the atmosphere indicate that the groundwater gained CO2 of the
breathing of the plants and the degradation of the organic matter of the ground [21]. Moreover, the values of pH
follow the same evolution that the pCO2 and remain lower than 8.3. Therefore alkalinity is essentially made up
of bicarbonates (HCO3-) [22] which represent in the majority of the cases the anion dominating with more than
50 % of the total mass of the dissolved charge.
          Water is characterized by a great variability of mineralization in space. They are of slightly with fairly
mineral-bearing having nevertheless strong mineralization of some boreholes in urban environment. Electric
Conductivity varies between 24 µs/cm and 1747 µs/cm. [23] showed that the electric conductivity of
groundwater varies from 227 to 1740 µs/cm with an average of 605.3 µs/cm in zone of basement in the basin of
Dargol in Niger. This great variation shows a notable heterogeneity in the mineral charge distribution of
groundwater due to lithology and specific pollution. The extreme values of conductivity observed are noticed
with boreholes FP1 (1747 µs/cm), FP8 (1184 µs/cm) and FP6 (880 µs/cm). These points are located in urban
environment and would be probably of anthropic origin. Borehole FP1 is located near a large dumping ground
and probably receives water resulting from the scrubbing of this one. As for borehole FP8, it is beside the
gutters by where forwards worn water coming from the big market of the city. It is showed that the sources of
direct pollution are the escapes of the sewerage systems, the septic tanks, surface the water, solid waste, fuel the
puddle pools, the infiltration starting from the polluted rivers, the intrusion saltworks, the fertilizers, the
pesticides, the scrubbing of the zone unsaturated at the time of the piezometric increase among so much of
others. The lowest mineralization at the well P3 (24 µs/cm) is located at an altitude of 333m and is on the rock,
it is what explained the lowest mineralization of this well.
         However, from the conductivity point of view, we can classify the groundwater of the study area in
three groups: that with less mineralization water whose conductivity is lower than 300 µs/cm. This group
includes surface water, well and some borehole who are for most of them located in the West and a little
extreme East (Figure 3). The second group made up of fairly mineralization water whose conductivity lies
between 300 and 800 µs/cm. This one occupies Center-East and the South-west of the study area. Finally the
third group, with the highest mineralization with conductivities higher than 800 µs/cm. It occupies the Center-
South and corresponds to the points sampled in the town of Dapaong.
         Water is characterized by a bicarbonate prevalence on nitrates, chlorides and sulphates. As for the
cations, calcium prevails followed sodium, magnesium and potassium. The facies HCO3-Ca and HCO3-Ca-Mg
are the major characteristic of water in basement zone in crystalline medium and cristallophyllian areas. They
are largely the dominant ions, and they represent more than 50% of the dissolved anion load. The work carried
out in other areas in Côte d'ivoire in medium of basement more precisely in the zone of Soubré in CI [24], the
area of Man in CI [25], in Kara region in Togo [6], and in plateau region in Togo [5] also highlight the
importance of the calcic and magnesian bicarbonated facies. It is the same for [23] which reveals an abundance
of calco-magnesian bicarbonated water (70%) in water of the fissured aquifers of the South-west of Niger. The
ions bicarbonates come mainly from the acid hydrolysis of the rocks. For example anorthite (plagioclase of the
calcic pole) produced kaolinite and releases from calcium and the ions bicarbonates according to the reaction:
(ammonification and nitrification) [33]. The concentrations raised out of sulphates which are sometimes
associated to high chloride and nitrate concentrations are clearly indicating of an anthropogenic pollution [34].
The impact of the anthropic activities on the quality of groundwater constitutes a major problem of a world
nature and is the subject of several studies: [35; 36]. This various works also showed the influence of anthropic
contributions in the quality of groundwater. However borehole F63, located in rural medium has a concentration
of 123.4 mg/L in nitrates, this justifies an intense practice of agricultural activities accompanied by the use of
artificial fertilisers.
          The nitrates NO3- have a surface origin and thus come from the anthropic activities. However, the
nitrate concentrations in boreholes belonging to the chlorinated and sulphated facies calcic and magnesian
exceed all the standards of potability of WHO (50 mg/L). This confirms the surface origin of the recharge of
these aquifers.
          The Factor F1 of the PCA indicates that Cl-, Na+, and SO42- and NO3- are put in solution by the same
phenomenon. The regrouping around the axis F1 also indicates the processes of mineralization by surface water
infiltration and dissolution of the rock. The elements which define this factor come from infiltration and a long
residence time in solution following the contact water-rock. These elements come from the hydrolysis of
minerals present in the rocks which constitute the rock substratum of the aquifers which shelter water of the
zone of study [37]. Indeed, the factor F1 thus expresses the phenomenon of mineralization residence time by
dissolution. The chlorides, sulphates and nitrates are almost always less in water resulting from granites [38;
39], but there place is to notice that the concentrations are not negligible in water of the alterity aquifers.
          Sodium Na+ comes from the deterioration of feldspars contained in the igneous rocks, of the attack of
clayey minerals and the dissolution of soluble salt grains contained in the rocks and the beds of evaporites. It
should be noticed that the geology of the study area is dominated by the formations of Paleoproterozoïc made up
mainly of granites and gneiss. The hydrolysis of such rocks rich in alkaline feldspars and acid plagioclases,
explains the fact that the Ca2+ contents and Na+ are dominant for the cations in groundwater. These ions result
from the deterioration of the rocks and the weathering of silicated minerals [40].
                                           IV.      CONCLUSION
          The groundwater quality in the Northern Togo has been evaluated for their chemical composition and
suitability for human consumption. In this study, a combined hydrochemical, hydrogeological and varied
statistical analysis methods are used to understand the mineralization status and geochemical processes
occurring in birrimian basement. This study in hydrochemical results show that groundwater has in majority
between fresh water and fairly mineralization water. However, some points have high mineralization because of
anthropic origin, signs of an urban pollution. The geochemistry of groundwater beneath the city of Dapaong
does suggest that the leaky sewage system, septic wells and other point source of contamination have most
likely impacted groundwater quality. The hydrofacies approach shows the existence of four facies largely
dominated by the facies HCO3-Ca and the facies HCO3-Ca-Mg. The analysis factorial by statistical units
highlighted three (3) groups of water: Group 1 made up the highest mineralization water which contents higher
nitrates than the standard of potability of WHO. Group 2 is characterized by the high bicarbonates
concentrations and an average mineralization, then group 3 concerns the wells and the majority of boreholes of
the study area with low electric conductivity. Principal Components Analysis (PCA), Hierarchical Cluster
Analysis (HCA) and the different diagrams of correlation indicate that the mineralization of groundwater in the
study area is controlled by the silicates weathering related to the residence time of water in the aquifer. These
results indicate that future development of urban areas within birrimian basin in North Togo, especially those
located on the recharge areas could represent a serious threat to groundwater quality. This study gave results
certainly interesting but it deserves to be supplemented by other investigations in particular a study on isotopic
hydrology, heavy metals, the pesticides as well as a bacterial study. This work will allow us to have a data base
for a follow-up of physicochemical of groundwater in the study area.
                                                 REFERENCES
 [1].    Rapport de mission de consultation sur les OMD de l’eau potable et de l’assainissement au Togo 2007.
 [2].    Koffi K. V., 2017. Hydrogeochemistry and impacts of climate change on groundwater recharge: Case
         study of the crystalline basement aquifer of Northern Ghana. Thèse de Doctorat de l’Université
         d’Abomey-Calavi; p241.
 [3].    Amadou H., Mahaman S. L., Abdou S. M., 2014. Caractérisation hydro chimique des eaux souterraines
         de la région de Tahoua (Niger). Journal of Applied Biosciences 80:7161 – 7172
 [4].    PNUD, FAO., 2001. Proposition de services dans le secteur de l’eau – Politiques et stratégies de
         gestion intégrée des ressources en eau (GIRE). TOG/00/008/A/08/01. Document de service d’appui à
         l’élaboration de politiques et de programmes (SAEPP).
[5].   Akpataku, K. V., Gnazou, M. D. T., Bawa, L. M., Djaneye-Boundjou G. et Faye, S., 2015. Étude
       hydrogéochimique du système aquifère granito-gneissique dans la préfecture du Moyen-Mono, Togo,
       Afrique SCIENCE 12(2) 38 – 53
[6].   Zoulgami S., M. D. T. Gnazou M. D. T.*,Kodom T. G. Djaneye-Boundjou G. BAWA L. M., 2015.
       Physico-chemical study of groundwater in the Northeast of Kara region (Togo). Int. J. Biol. Chem. Sci.
       9(3): 1711-1724.
[7].   Assouma, D., 1988. Etude par modèle mathématique de la structure et du fonctionnement d’un aquifère
       de socle exploitée, en région tropicale (Alimentation en eau potable de la ville de Dapaong). Thèse de
       Doctorat de 3ème cycle, Université d’Orléans. p183.
[8].   Dewandel B, Lachassagne P, Wyns R, Marechal JC, Krishnamurthy NS., 2006. A generalized 3-D
       geological and hydrogeological conceptual model of granite aquifers controlled by single or multiphase
       weathering. Journal of Hydrology, 330:260284.doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2006.03.026.
[9].   Alassane A. 2011. Pratique de l’élevage et évolution du milieu naturel dans la région des Savanes
       (Nord-Togo) et dans le Nord-Ouest du département de l’Atacora (Bénin). Thèse de Doctorat unique de
       Géographie, Université de Lomé ; p40
[10]. Ahoussi K. E., Soro N., Soro G., Lasm T., Oga M. S., Zade S. 2008. Groundwater Pollution in Africans
       Biggest Towns: Case of the Town of Abidjan (Côte d’Ivoire). European Journal of Scientific Research,
       20(2), 302-316.
[11]. Biémi J., 1992. Contribution à l’étude géologique, hydrogéologique et par télédétection des bassins
       versants Subsahéliens du socle précambrien d’Afrique de l’Ouest : Hydrostructurale, hydrochimie et
       isotopie des aquifères discontinus des sillons et aires granitiques de la Haute Marahoué (Côte d’Ivoire).
       Thèse d’Etat, Université Nationale de Côte d’Ivoire, p. 480.
 [12]. Yidana SM, Ophori D, Banoeng-Yakubo B., 2008. A multivariate statistical analysis of surface water
       chemistry data. The Ankobra Basin, Ghana. Journal of Environmental Management, 86: 80-87.
[13] O.M.S, 2000. «Directives de qualité pour l’eau de boisson». 2nd Ed., Vol 2, Critères d’hygiène et
       documentation à l’appui, 1050p
[14]. Mangin A., 1974. Contribution à l’étude hydrodynamique des aquifères karstiques. Concepts
       méthodologiques adoptés. Systèmes karstiques étudiés. Ann. Spéléol. 29, 4, 495.601.
[15]. Belkhiri L, Boudoukha A, Mouni L, Baouz T., 2010. Application of multivariate statistical methods
       and inverse geochemical modeling for characterization of groundwater—A case study: Ain Azel plain
       (Algeria). Geoderma 159:390–398. doi: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2010.08.016
[16]. Kumar P.S, Jegathambal P, Nair S. James EJ., 2015. Temperature and pH dependent geochemical
       modeling of fluoride mobilization in the groundwater of a crystalline aquifer in southern India. J
       Geochem Explor 156:1–9. doi: 10.1016/j.gexplo.2015.04.008
[17]. Kortatsi BK., 2006. Hydrochemical characterization of groundwater in the Accra plains of Ghana.
       Environ Geol 50:299–311. doi: 10.1007/s00254-006-0206-4
[18]. Yaméogo S., 2008. Ressources en eau souterraine du centre urbain de Ouagadougou au Burkina Faso :
       Qualité et Vulnérabilité. Thèse de doctorat en Sciences de l’Université d’Avignon et des Pays de
       Vaucluse, p254
[19]. Ousmane B., 1988. Etude géochimique et isotopique des aquifères de socle de la bande sahélienne du
       Niger (Liptako, Sud-Maradi, Zinder-Est). Thèse Univ. Niamey, p175.
 [20]. Faillat J.P. et Drogue C., 1993. Différenciation hydrochimique des nappes superposées d’altérites et de
       fissures en socle granitique. Journal des Sciences hydrologiques, pp215-229.
[21]. Van der Weijden CH, Pacheco F., 2003. Hydrochemistry, weathering and weathering rates on Madeira
       Island
[22]. Drever, J.I., 1988. The Geochemistry of Natural Waters, 2nd Edition: Prentice, Englewood Cliffs, New
       Jersey, 402 p.
[23]. Abdou Babaye M. S., Sandao I., Saley M. B., Wagani I., Ousmane B., 2016. Comportement
       hydrogéochimique et contamination des eaux des aquifères fissurés du socle précambrien en milieu
       semi-aride (Sud-Ouest du Niger). Int. J. Biol. Chem. Sci. 10(6): 2728-2743
[24]. Soro N., 2002. Hydrochimie et géochimie et isotopique des eaux souterraines du degré carré de Grand-
       lahou et ses environs (sud-ouest de la côte d’ivoire). Implications hydrologiques et hydrogéologiques.
       Thèse, de doctorat, Université de Cocody, Abidjan, p 256.
[25]. Goné D.L. Savané I. Yao NA. Biémi J., 2005. Mobilité relative des cations majeurs lors de l’altération
       des roches et acquisition de la minéralisation des eaux souterraines dans le degré carré de Man. Sci.
       Nat., 2(1): 85-94.
[26]. Ouedraogo M., 2016. Caractérisation des aquifères de socle pour l'amélioration de la productivité des
       forages d'hydraulique villageoise dans le bassin versant du Bandama blanc amont (Nord de la Côte
       d'Ivoire). Thèse de Doctorat de l’Université Paris-Sud ; 241p.
[27].  Rajmohan N. Elango L., 2004. Identification and evolution of hydrogeochemical processes in the
       groundwater environment in an area of the Palar and Cheyyar River Basins, Southern India. Environ
       Geol 46:47–61 . doi: 10.1007/s00254-004-1012-5
[28]. Loh YS. Banoeng-Yakubo B. Yidana SM., 2012. Hydrochemical Characterisation of
       Groundwater in Parts of the Volta Basin, Northern Ghana. Ghana Min J 13:24–32
[29]. Rogers RJ, 1989. Geochemical comparison of ground water in areas of New England, New York, and
       Pennsylvania. Ground Water 27:690–712
[30]. Hounslow A., 1995. Water quality data: analysis and interpretation. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton
[31]. Travi Y, J.Y. GAC, J.Ch. Fontes, B. Fritz, 1987. Reconnaissance chimique et isotopique des eaux de
       pluie au Sénégal. Géodynamique 2 (1), p : 43- 53.
[32]. Ousmane. B, J.Ch Fontes J.F Aranyossy, A. Joseph, 1983. Hydrologie isotopique et hydrochimie des
       aquifères discontinus de la bande sahélienne et de l’Aïr (Niger). IAEA-SM- 270/59 p : 365-395.
[33]. Aghzar N, Bellouti H et Soudi B., 2001. Pollution nitrique des eaux souterraines au Tadla (Maroc).
       Rev. Sci. Eau, 15(2) 459-492.
[34]. Walraevensa K.,Bakundukizea C., Mtonia, Y. E., Campa M. V., 2018. Understanding the
       hydrogeochemical evolution of groundwater in Precambrian basement aquifers: A case study of
       Bugesera region in Burundi; Journal of Geochemical Exploration.
[35]. Bricha S., Ounine K., Oulkheir S., EL Haloui N., Attarassi B., 2007. Etude de la qualité
       physicochimique de la nappe phréatique M’nasra (Maroc). Afrique SCIENCE 03 (3), 391-404.
[36]. El Asslouj J., Kholtei S., El Amrani-Paaza N., Hilali A., 2007. Impact des activités anthropiques sur la
       qualité des eaux souterraines de la communauté Mzamza (Chaouia, Maroc). Revue des sciences de
       l'eau, vol. 20, n° 3, 309-321.
[37]. Eblin S.G.*, Soro G.M., Sombo A.P., Aka N., Kambiré O. Soro N., 2014. Hydrogéochimie des eaux
       souterraines de la région d’Adiaké (Sud-Est côtier de la Côte d’Ivoire), Larhyss Journal, ISSN 1112-
       3680, n°17, Mars 2014, pp. 193-214
 [38]. Travi. Y, et O. Dia, D. Fohlen, 1988. Hydrogéochimie des eaux souterraines de quelques formations de
       socle au Sénégal Oriental. 14 pages.
[39]. Onugba. A., 1990. Contribution à la connaissance des systèmes aquifères de la Haute Benoué (Nigéria)
       : Etude hydro chimique et isotopique de zones témoins du socle et du sédimentaire. Vulnérabilité des
       forages à la pollution. Thèse de doctorat. Université d’Avignon et des pays de Vaucluse. 183 p.
[40]. Savané I, Soro N. 2001. Caractérisation chimique et isotopique des eaux souterraines du Nord-Ouest de
       la Côte: recharge des aquifères discontinus de la région d’Odienné. Africa Géoscience Review, 8(4):
       379-390.