IN THE SMALL CAUSES COURT AT BANDRA MUMBAI
R.A.E. & R. SUIT NO. 174/416 of 2008
MR.PUNSUR GOVIND CHARAN …Plaintiff
Versus
MR. BABULAL RAMSAMUJ … Defendant
It is submitted on behalf of the defendant above named as under;-
It is matter of record that during the pendency of the aforesaid
suit and after filing my examination in chief defendant took out
application to amend written statement and after considering the
merits of the said application, this Hon’ble Court is please to allow
amendment application of defendant whereby defendant filed his
written statement and accordingly vide order dt. 5 th March 2016, this
Hon’ble Court is please to frame additional issue whereby defendant is
required to file additional examination in chief, but, however some of
the important documents of defendants in support of said additional
issue is not traceable and the defendant is searching the same as it
goes to the root cause of the matter and therefore he needs at least 2
weeks time to search said documents and to file additional
examination in chief
It is therefore prayed that in the interest of justice the above
matter may be adjourned today for 2 weeks
Mumbai.
Dated this 15th day of April 2016
Advocate for Defendant
IN THE SMALL CAUSES COURT AT BANDRA MUMBAI
R.A.E. & R. SUIT NO. 174/416 of 2008
MR.PUNSUR GOVIND CHARAN …Plaintiff
Versus
MR. BABULAL RAMSAMUJ … Defendant
It is submitted on behalf of the defendant above named as
under;-
That the aforesaid matter is kept today for cross
examination of defendant but, due to sudden illness the
defendant is unable to attend this Hon’ble Court today.
It is therefore prayed that in the interest of justice the
above matter may be adjourned today.
Mumbai.
Dated this 10th day of April 2015
Advocate for Defendant
That this Hon’ble Court vide an order dt. 24.07.2014 is
please to reject the application of defendant for discarding
the evidence of P.W. 2 being Ex. No. ____. That the
defendant abovenamed wants to consider the order of this
Hon’ble Court rejecting the application for discarding the
evidence of P.W. 2 being Ex. No. ____ by filing necessary
Appeal/Revision before appropriate forum.
It is therefore prayed that this Hon’ble Court may be
please to stay the operation of order passed in Ex. No. ____
and/or adjourn the above matter for the period of 6 weeks in
the interest of justice.
Mumbai
This 1st day of August 2014
Advocate for Defendant
IN THE SMALL CAUSES COURT AT BANDRA MUMBAI
R.A.E. & R. SUIT NO. 174/416 of 2008
MR.PUNSUR GOVIND CHARAN …Plaintiff
Versus
MR. BABULAL RAMSAMUJ … Defendant
It is submitted on behalf of the defendant above named as
under;-
That Ld. Counsel appearing for the Defendant above
named is held up today in Hon’ble Supreme Court
expedited matter being Election Petition no. 70 of 2012 in
Small Causes Court Main Branch. Therefore he is unable
to remain present before this Hon’ble Court today. The
circumstances are beyond the control of Ld. Advocate for
the Defendant. Copy of order of Hon’ble Supreme Court is
annexed herewith.
It is therefore prayed that in the interest of justice this
Hon’ble Court may be please to grant adjournment in the
matter.
Mumbai
Dated this 4th day of July, 2014
Advocate for Defendant
That the aforesaid matter is kept for cross examination of
P.W. 1 but, Ld. Advocate Mr. D.D. Singh appearing as
counsel for defendant above named is held up today in
Hon’ble City Civil Court for final argument in S.C. Suit
no.1105 of 2009. Therefore he is unable to remain present
before this Hon’ble Court today i.e. 07.04.2014;
It is therefore prayed that in the interest of justice may
be adjourn the matter today.
Mumbai
This 7th Day of April 2014
Advocate for Defendant
IN THE SMALL CAUSES COURT AT BANDRA MUMBAI
R.A.E. & R. SUIT NO. 174/416 of 2008
MR.PUNSUR GOVIND CHARAN …Plaintiff
Versus
MR. BABULAL RAMSAMUJ … Defendant
It is submitted on behalf of the defendant above named
as under;-
That during the pendency of the aforesaid suit the
plaintiff has executed decree in respect of premises adjoining
and adjacent to suit property. In the aforesaid suit the
plaintiff in addition to other ground of eviction has also
sought ground of bonafide requirement to evict the
defendant. Since the plaintiff has executed decree in respect
of the said adjoining business premises and recently started
his own business and as such ground of bonafide
requirement does not survive and hence the defendant is
making inquiry about the suit proceeding wherein he got
decree of eviction and thereby executed decree in respect of
said adjoining business premises whereby the defendant can
make an amendment to bring the said fact on record to
nullify the ground of bonafide requirement made by the
plaintiff. And as such the defendant require time to search
the said suit proceeding and accordingly to amend the
written statement, by taking out necessary amendment
application.
It is therefore prayed that in the interest of justice this
Hon’ble Court may be pleased to grant four week
adjournment to enable the defendant to take necessary steps
for necessary amendment application.
Mumbai dated this 28th day of September 2012
Advocate for Defendant Defendant
