Scribd
Upload
37 views1 page

Portfolio Assessment of Usman Khan Jadoon Criterion Comments of Examiner Mark

The document provides a portfolio assessment of Usman Khan Jadoon's design project. It evaluates seven criteria: identification of need and design brief, research, generation of design ideas, development of proposed solution, planning for production, product realization, and testing/evaluation. For each criterion, the examiner provides comments on strengths and weaknesses and assigns a mark out of a total possible points. Overall, Usman received a total of 82 out of a possible 100 marks for his portfolio, demonstrating a thorough process and high-quality final product.

Uploaded by

TSS DT
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
37 views1 page

Portfolio Assessment of Usman Khan Jadoon Criterion Comments of Examiner Mark

The document provides a portfolio assessment of Usman Khan Jadoon's design project. It evaluates seven criteria: identification of need and design brief, research, generation of design ideas, development of proposed solution, planning for production, product realization, and testing/evaluation. For each criterion, the examiner provides comments on strengths and weaknesses and assigns a mark out of a total possible points. Overall, Usman received a total of 82 out of a possible 100 marks for his portfolio, demonstrating a thorough process and high-quality final product.

Uploaded by

TSS DT
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

Portfolio Assessment of Usman Khan Jadoon

Criterion Comments of Examiner Mark

1. Identification of a need or  Detailed analysis of problem and need clearly identified.


opportunity with a brief analysis  Descriptive design brief and reference to the user requirement is detailed.
4 out of 5
leading to a design  Good use of task analysis to explore different possibilities.
brief  Specific constraints clearly set up.

2. Research into the design  Conclusive information gathered from research.


brief resulting in a  Critical findings in mood board, product analysis, questionnaire, designer research and client profile 8 out of 10
specification  Detailed specification that is linked well with research.

 A range of ideas showing different possibilities using good drawing technique.


3. Generation and exploration of  Comparative analysis of ideas is bit ambiguous
16 out of 20
design ideas  Use of descriptive annotations in developed ideas.
 Objective evaluation of ideas against specifications.
 Good development of proposed solution, with appropriate design modifications and reasoned
4. Development of proposed decision-making on materials.
12 out of 15
solution  Good use of CAD to develop a solution.
 Effective use of modelling to set up an effective planning for production.
 Sketching lacks in detailed annotations, and dimensions. Clear and detailed sequence of manufacture
5. Planning for production proposed using cutting list, time plan and flowchart. 8 out of 10
 Prototype making is detailed and clear.
 Completed to a high standard, fulfils the requirements of product specification and functions well.
6. Product realization 27 out of 30
 Photographic record of whole manufacturing process

 Objective testing and evaluation carried out in the actual environment.


7. Testing and evaluation  Product evaluated against specification and by the client. 7 out of 10
 Weaknesses and strengths are identified but the suggestions for the future can be added.

Total mark awarded 82 out of 100

You might also like