Forage Res., 44 (4) : pp. 286-290 (2019) http://forageresearch.

in

PERFORMANCE OF DUAL PURPOSE OAT, WHEAT AND BARLEY

UNDER DIFFERENT CUTTING MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
A. S. GODARA1, SATPAL*, NEELAM2, Y. JINDAL AND D. S. PHOGAT
Forage Section, Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding, 2Department of Agronomy
CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar-125 004 (Haryana), India
*(e-mail: satpal.fpj@gmail.com)
(Received : 5 February 2019; Accepted : 30 March 2019)

SUMMARY

A field experiment was conducted at CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar (Haryana)
during winter season (rabi) 2014-15 to study the performance of dual purpose oat, wheat and barley
under different cutting management system. Three crops i. e. oat, wheat and barley and four cutting
management i. e. no cutting, cutting for fodder at 50, 60 and 70 days after sowing (DAS) were replicated
thrice under split plot design. The varieties used were HJ 8, WH 1164 and RD 2035 for oat, wheat and
barley, respectively. The soil of the experimental field was sandy loam in texture with pH 8.6, organic
carbon 0.49%, available phosphorus 14.0 kg/ha and available potassium 254.0 kg/ha. Among crops, oat
produced the maximum green fodder, dry matter followed by barley. However, wheat produced the
maximum grain yield followed by barley. Among different cutting management practices, maximum
green fodder and dry matter yield were recorded when cut was taken 70 DAS and then left for grain.
Wheat crop produced the highest grain and second highest straw yield and thereby fetched highest B:C
ratio (2.16). Based on the results, it could be concluded that among the crops i. e. oat, barley and wheat,
all the three crops suits for dual purpose but crop selection should be based on the priority of end user. If
the priority was to get more green fodder from first cut then oat could be first choice followed by barley
and wheat. Besides this, the cutting management schedule needs to be standardized. The green fodder
yield increased significantly as the number of days to cut increased from 50 to 70 from sowing. But the
grain yield decreased significantly as the cutting schedule was advanced from 50 days onward. Based on
the economic analysis, wheat was the most remunerative crop followed by oat for dual purpose. If
compared with no cut where remunerations were highest, the cut at 50 DAS was most beneficial.

Key words : Dual purpose, dry matter, fodder yield, cutting management, oat, barley and wheat

India supports 512 million livestock animal consumption and grains for human, the
population and there is tremendous pressure on conventional cereal crops need to be grown for dual
availability of feed and fodder for the livestock purpose under irrigated farming system (Naveed,
(Anonymous, 2014a). Country faces a net deficit of 2013; Dove and Kirkegaard, 2014; Jarial, 2014). In
36% green fodder, 11% dry fodder and 49% feed the Northern plains (Rajasthan, Madhya Pradesh,
(Anonymous, 2016). Dual purpose varieties of wheat, Southern Haryana, South West Punjab and Western
oat and barley can be helpful in ensuring fodder and U.P.), animal husbandry occupies an important role
feed security for the burgeoning livestock and human and there is a big gap between demand and supply of
population. Besides this, the lodging problem of these forage. In these areas barley can be grown as dual
cereal fodders can be managed by taking one fodder purpose crop (Verma et al., 2007). The grain yield of
cut and then one cut for grain. The main problem is to improved varieties of multicut oat is poor due to
identify the location specific variety of cereal crop lodging and as such grain yield potential of this crop
suitable for dual purpose along with the cutting is low in comparison to other cereal crops. Lesser seed
management schedule and improved agronomic production of this crop results in less availability of
practices to overcome the issue of fodder, feed and quality seeds. Therefore, it is necessary to develop
food scarcity. Barley, wheat and oat besides providing strategies for obtaining considerable yield of green
grain, has enormous potential for fodder and is fast fodder as well as grain from the same crop by adopting
emerging as promising crop for dual purpose. To appropriate cutting management (Singh et al., 2014).
mitigate the continued shortage of green fodder for Among cereals, wheat also has the potential to produce
1
Current address: Agricultural Research Station, Bikaner, SKRAU, Bikaner (Rajasthan), India.
 DUAL PURPOSE OAT, WHEAT & BARLEY UNDER CUTTING MANAGEMENT 287

more grain yield along with substantially higher green and maximum (ºC), relative humidity of morning and
fodder and also for fetching higher net income, dual evening (%) and rainfall (mm). The soil of the
purpose wheat requires high level of management and experimental site was sandy loam in texture with pH
a balance should be there between both the 8.6, organic carbon 0.49%, available phosphorus 14.0
components (fodder and grain). Schedules of cutting kg/ha and available potassium 254.0 kg/ha. Three
as well as sowing time both are important to realize crops viz. oats, barley and wheat and four cutting
the optimum yield of green fodder and grains from management viz. no cut, cutting of fodder at 50 DAS,
dual purpose wheat (Waheddullah et. al., 2018). cutting of fodder at 60 DAS, cutting of fodder at 70
Keeping these points in view, the present investigation DAS, were replicated thrice under split plot design.
was taken up to find out suitable cereal crop and cutting Second cut was taken for grain in all the treatments
schedule to realize the maximum green fodder and except for no cut. The varieties used were HJ 8, WH
grain yield under semi-arid conditions. 1164 and RD 2035 for oat, wheat and barley,
respectively. The sowing was done in second fortnight
MATERIALS AND METHODS of November 2014 in open furrows at 25 cm apart
using the seed rate of 100 kg/ha. All the other standard
A field experiment was conducted during agronomic practices for the cultivation of oat, wheat
Rabi season of 2014-15 at Forage Section Research and barley were followed uniformly in all the
Farm of CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar treatments (Anonymous, 2014b). The harvested green
(Haryana), India situated at 29°10' N latitude, 75°46' fodder from each plot was weighed in situ and then
E longitude, and altitude of 215.2 m above mean sea converted into q/ha. A random sample of 500 g was
level. The site has semi-arid and sub-tropical climate taken from each plot at the time of green fodder
with hot dry summer and severe cold winter. Average harvest, chopped well and put into paper bag. These
annual rainfall is about 450 mm, 75 per cent of which bags were aerated by making small holes all over. The
is received in three months, from July to September samples were first dried in the sun for 15 days and
during south-west monsoon. Fig. 1 represents the then transferred in an electric hot air oven for drying
weekly weather parameters i.e. temperature - minimum at a temperature of 60±5°C till constant weight was

Rainfall (mm) Temp Max Temp Mini RH (Morning) RH (Evening)

100 100

90 90

80 80
Relateive Humidity (%) 

70 70

60 60
Temperatrue (oC) 
Rainfall (mm)  

50 50

40 40

30 30

20 20

10 10

0 0
41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20

Standard Meteorological Weeks 

Fig. 1. Weekly weather data during the season.

288 GODARA, SATPAL, NEELAM, JINDAL AND PHOGAT

achieved. On the basis of dry weight of these samples, more dry matter than wheat. Maximum plant height
the green fodder yield was converted into dry matter (71.0 cm) was recorded with oat which was
yield (q/ha). Crude protein content was estimated in significantly higher over barley and wheat. Higher
dried and grinded samples (2 mm sieve size), collected yield of oat is because of maximum height and higher
at first cut. The crude protein content was calculated number of tillers per meter row length. Highest number
by multiplying the nitrogen percentage with 5.83 of tillers per m row length (112.4) was recorded with
estimated by conventional micro-Kjeldhal method wheat which was on a par with oat but significantly
(AOAC, 1995). Crude protein yield was calculated superior over barley. Maximum L:S ratio was recorded
by the multiplication of crude protein content (%) with in oat followed by wheat and barley. The higher L:S
dry matter yield (q/ha), respectively. Economics was ratio of oat indicates more leafage, leaf area and more
worked out on the basis of prevailing prices of inputs green biomass of this crop as compared to wheat and
and outputs in the local market. The experimental data barley. High value of L:S ratio of oat is an indicator
were analyzed by using OPSTAT software available that it is a more suitable crop for green fodder.
on CCS Haryana Agricultural University home page
(Sheoran et al., 1998). Grain and straw yield evaluation among
crops : Highest straw yield was recorded with oat
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION which was significantly superior over barley but at
par with wheat. However, highest grain yield (35.1 q/
A. Crops : ha) was recorded with wheat which was significantly
superior over barley and oat. Wheat tends to produce
Green fodder & dry matter evaluation more tillers and leaves than are necessary for maximum
among crops : The data presented in Table 2 revealed grain yield, so a reduction in tiller number may have
that among crops, highest green fodder and dry matter no effect on grain yields. The dual-purpose system is
yield (154.7 and 24.6 q/ha) were recorded with oats likely to have little effect on wheat grain yield when
which were significantly superior over barley and soil fertility is adequate (Lollato et al., 2017). Highest
wheat. The green fodder yield recorded in oat was plant height (118.6 cm) was recorded with oat which
31.09 and 36.40 percent higher over barley and wheat. was significantly superior over wheat and barley. No
The dry matter yield of oat was 29.27 and 33.74 percent significant difference was observed among number of
higher over barley and wheat. Loretta Serafin et. al. tillers per meter row length at grain harvest. Higher
(2013) also reported that oats and barley produced straw yield of oat was due to its better regeneration

TABLE 1
Performance of dual purpose forage crops under different cutting management system

Treatments Plant height Leaf : Stem Tillers/mrl Green Dry Grain Straw Plant Tiller/mrl B:C
at fodder ratio at fodder fodder matter yield yield height at grain
harvest harvest yield yield (q/ha) (q/ha) at grain harvest
(cm) (q/ha) (q/ha) harvest
(cm)

A. Crops
Oat (HJ 8) 71.0 0.48 111.8 154.7 24.6 19.7 47.9 118.6 102.8 1.76
Wheat (WH 1164) 55.9 0.42 112.4 98.4 16.3 35.1 46.1 94.4 100.0 2.16
Barley (RD 2035) 58.1 0.38 100.7 106.6 17.4 31.7 38.5 83.9 94.8 1.71
C. D. (P=0.05) 3.4 - 8.0 9.7 1.3 1.8 3.7 4.3 NS 0.1
B. Cutting management
No cut - - - - - 36.5 53.9 107.8 112.3 2.15
Cut (50 DAS) 47.6 0.46 103.7 61.6 8.4 34.1 49.2 104.3 106.9 1.99
Cut (60 DAS) 58.7 0.43 110.0 105.1 16.0 26.9 42.0 96.9 96.8 1.77
Cut (70 DAS) 78.8 0.39 111.2 192.9 33.9 17.8 31.6 86.9 80.9 1.58
C. D. (P=0.05) 3.4 - NS 9.7 1.3 2.0 4.2 4.9 7.9 0.12
A×B
C. D. (P=0.05) NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS

DAS-Days after sowing, NS-Non Significant, B : C-Benefit Cost ratio.

 DUAL PURPOSE OAT, WHEAT & BARLEY UNDER CUTTING MANAGEMENT 289

capacity, higher re-growth and plant height over the over cut at 60 and 70 DAS.
wheat and barley but the higher grain yield of wheat
might be due to higher number of grains per earhead, Interaction of crop and cutting
test weight and higher no. of effective tillers per unit management : Data presented in table 1 reveal that
area. Serafin et. al. (2013) while comparing the no interactive effect was observed for all the characters
performance of oat, barley and wheat also found wheat among crops and cutting management schedules.
produced the least amount of dry matter but the second
highest grain yield. Oats in comparison had the poorest Economics : Data presented in Table 1 reveal
grain recovery of all species. Barley appeared to give that wheat crop produced the highest grain and second
the best balance between dry matter production and highest straw yield and thereby fetched highest B:C
grain recovery. ratio (2.16). Waheddullah et. al. (2018) also reported
that wheat (C 306) harvested at 55 DAS for green
B. Cutting management fodder was found most suitable having grain yield
(37.10 q/ha with a percent reduction of 9.3 over uncut)
For green fodder, cuttings were taken at 50, and additional green fodder yield of 143.13 q/ha over
60 and 70 DAS, besides this one treatment was also uncut and concluded it as most remunerative option.
kept under no cut. Highest plant height (78.8 cm) was Serafin et. al. (2013) concluded that wheat has a higher
recorded with the cut at 70 DAS which was return price for the sale of the grain as compared to
significantly higher over 60 and 50 DAS. Significantly barley and oat. Among cutting management, highest
highest green fodder yield (192.9 q/ha) and dry matter B:C ratio (2.15) was observed in no cut followed by
yield (33.9 q/ha) were recorded at 70 DAS which was cut at 50 DAS.
83.9, 124.9 and 111.9 and 303.6 per cent higher over
60 and 50 DAS. This might be due to increased leaf Soil fertility status : No significant
area index with the advancement of crop age till 70 differences were observed for organic carbon (%),
days after sowing. Similar results were also reported available phosphorus and available potassium
by Verma et al. 2016. However, Maximum L:S ratio analyzed in the soil after crop harvest among various
(0.46) was observed in the cut at 50 DAS followed by treatments (Table 2).
cut at 60 and 70 DAS. The number of tillers per meter TABLE 2
row length was not affected significantly among the Soil fertility status of the soil after crop harvest
cut at different intervals. The treatments in which cut
were taken at 50, 60 and 70 DAS were later on left for Treatments Organic Available Available
grain production. It was observed that highest grain carbon Phosphorus Potassium
(%) (kg/ha) (kg/ha)
yield (36.5 q/ha) was recorded in no cut which was
significantly superior over the cut at 50, 60 and 70 A. Crops
DAS treatments. The grain yield produced in no cut Oat 0.48 13.0 252
was 7, 35 and 105 per cent higher over 50, 60 and 70 Wheat 0.50 14.0 252
DAS cut for green fodder treatment. Same trend was Barley 0.50 14.0 254
also observed for straw yield. This was probably due C. D. (P=0.05) NS NS NS
B. Cutting management
to lower number of effective tillers in cut treatments
No cut 0.48 14.0 254
as some tillers might have failed to regenerate after Cut (50 DAS) 0.50 13.0 252
cutting (Waheddullah et. al., 2018). Maximum Plant Cut (60 DAS) 0.49 13.0 251
height (107.8 cm) was recorded in no cut which was Cut (70DAS) 0.50 14.0 252
significantly higher over 60 and 70 DAS but at par C. D. (P=0.05) NS NS NS
with the cut at 50 DAS. The reason might be
DAS-Days after sowing, NS-Non Significant.
decapitation of wheat causing termination of growth
and the new growth of shoot could not attain the same CONCLUSION
plant height as that of uncut treatment on account of
slow growth under different planting time Khalil et Based on the results, it can be concluded that
al. (2011) also found that plant height was significantly among crops, oat produced the maximum green fodder,
affected by different cutting schedules. Highest dry matter followed by barley at first cut. Among crops,
number of tillers/mrl was recorded in no cut which wheat produced the maximum grain yield followed
was at par with cut at 50 DAS but significantly superior by barley. Among different cutting management
290 GODARA, SATPAL, NEELAM, JINDAL AND PHOGAT

practices, maximum green fodder and dry matter yield Adaptation to and Mitigation of Climate
were recorded when cut was taken 70 DAS. Based on Variability and Change.
the economic analysis, wheat was the most Naveed, K. 2013 : Enhancement of dual-purpose wheat
remunerative crop followed by oat for dual purpose. productivity through agronomic techniques. Pak.
J. Bot. 45 : 1299-1305.
If compared with no cut where remunerations were
Serafin, Loretta, Matthew Gardner, James Fleming, Dougal
highest, the cut at 50 DAS was most beneficial. Pottie and Steve Harden. 2013 : Dual Purpose
Cereals: Varieties and Management for the
REFERENCES Northern Slopes and Plains, Grain Research and
Development Corporation, Australian
Anonymous 2014a : 19th Livestock Census 2012. All India Government. https://grdc.com.au/resources-and-
Report. http://dahd-archive.nic.in/dahd/ publications/grdc-update-papers/tab-content/grdc-
WriteReadData/Livestock.pdf. update-papers/2013/02/dual-purpose-cereals-
Anonymous 2014b : Package and practices of Rabi crops varieties-and-management-for-the-northern-
for Haryana. Published by Directorate of Extension slopes-and-plains.
Education, CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Sheoran, O. P., D. S. Tonk, L. S. Kaushik, R. C. Hasija, and
Hisar. 83-85, 1-25 and 26-30. R. S. Pannu, 1998 : Statistical Software Package
Anonymous 2016 : IGFRI Jhansi - 284003, (Uttar Pradesh), for Agricultural Research Workers. Recent
India. Chara Patrika. file:///D:/agron%20509% Advances in information theory, Statistics &
20manual%209.3.17/chara%20patrika%20IGFRI/ Computer Applications by D. S. Hooda and R. C.
Charapatrika%20January-December,%202016.pdf Hasija, Department of Mathematics Statistics,
AOAC, 1995 : Association of Official Analytical Chemists, CCS HAU, Hisar (139-143).
16thedn. Official Methods of Analysis, Arlington, Singh, P., V. Sharma and S. Kaushal, 2014: Effect of sowing
U.S.A, ID No. 984.13. dates and initial period of cutting on seed
Dove, H., J. Kirkegaard. 2014 : Using dual-purpose crops production of oats (Avena sativa L.). Forage Res.
in sheep-grazing systems. J Sci. Food Agri. 94 : 40 : 192-194.
1276-83. Verma, Deepika A.S. Gontia, Amit Jha and Anita Deshmukh.
Jarial, S. 2014 : An approach in disseminating dual purpose 2016 : Study on leaf area index and leaf area
wheat technology: a case from Uttarakhand, India. duration of growth analytical parameters in Wheat,
Indian Res. J. Ext. Edu. 14. Barley and Oat. International Journal of
Khalil, S. K., F. Khan, A. Rehman, F. Muhammad, Agriculture, Environment and Biotechnology. 9 :
Amanullah A.Z. Khan .2011 : Dual purpose wheat 827-831.
for forage and grain yield in response to cutting, Verma, R.P.S., A.S. Kharub., R.K. Sharma, Randhir Singh
seed rate and nitrogen. Pak. J. Bot. 43 : 937-947. and B. Mishra. 2007 : Jau Anusandhan –
Lollato, R. P., D. Marburger, J. D. Holman, P. Tomlinson, paramparik se vayasayik Upyog ki Aur.
D. Presley and J. T. Edwards. 2017 : Dual purpose Directorate of Wheat Research Karnal Research
wheat – management for forage and grain Bulletin 23 : 36 p.
production. A product of Great Plains Grazing - Waheddullah, A. K. Dhaka, Satish Kumar, Jitender K.
greatplainsgrazing.org. U.S. Department of Bhatia, Bhagat Singh and Ramprakash. 2018 :
Agriculture, Project Nos. 2012-02355 and 2013- Growth and yield performance of dual purpose
69002-23146 through the National Institute for wheat as influenced by sowing time and cutting
Food and Agriculture’s Agriculture and Food schedule. Int. J. Chem. Stud. 6 : 2611-2614.
Research Initiative, Regional Approaches for