PHILOSOPHY                              1
Philosophy of Education
             University Ana G. Méndez
                  Online Division
PHILOSOPHY                                                                                         2
                                    Philosophy of Education
       According to the Encyclopaedia Britannica (2019), philosophy is defines as “the rational,
abstract, and methodical consideration of reality as a whole or of fundamental dimensions of
human existence and experience” (p. 1). This term basically means “love of wisdom” and is used
by people to understand personal themselves, the world around them, and their relationship with
the world (Florida State University, 2019). Academically, philosophy is based in the questioning,
answering, and arguing of basic question about life divided in major areas of study. These areas
are known as metaphysics, Epistemology, Ethics, and Logic (Florida State University, 2019). On
the other side, educational philosophy refers to a teacher’s personal statement that serves as a
guide to issues related to students’ education such as best learning strategies and techniques
(Lewis, 2019). Referring to curriculum development, both philosophy and educational
philosophy influence in the establishment of standards, principles, and skills that will be attained
in a course. In addition, a specific philosophy of education serves to determine the goals and
objective of the curriculum, provides a framework for the planning implementation and the
evaluation of the curriculum, and helps to answers the questions about what materials,
techniques, strategies, and subject are better for the learning process of students (Thomas, Kuria,
Nyamwaka, & Nyakan, 2013). In other words, philosophy represents the starting point for the
decision-making process and the development of curriculum.
       The curriculum development process is focused in what teachers should teach, how
teachers should teach, and how they will organize the content. There are different principles of
curriculum development such as personalization, breadth, relevance, challenge, and enjoyment.
Personalization is the principle responsible of teaching professionals and institutions how to
review, evaluate, and improve the learning process and the teaching strategies taking into
PHILOSOPHY                                                                                            3
account all learners (Writers Bureau Centre, 2017). The principle of breadth provides learners a
vast amount of experiences in the learning process due to planning, organization and learning
through different contexts (Writers Bureaus Centre, 2017). Relevance allows learners to
understand why they are learning and the activities that are related to ensure that learners
recognize the value and relevance of learning in their lives (Writers Bureau Centre, 2017).
Through the principle of challenge, the curriculum enhances learner’s aspirations and ambitions
and students encounter the challenge to improve their potential creating an appreciation of a
motivational and attractive learning process (Writers Bureau Centre, 2017). According to the
Writers Bureau Centre (2017), the principle of coherence “allows a combination of the learner’s
different aspects of learning activities to form a coherent experience that enhances the
achievement of the learning outcomes” (p. 7). Additional principles are focused in the facts that
the development of the curriculum should be sustainable to the age and mental level of learners,
focused in the students’ interests, environmentally centered, comprehensive, co-related, and
flexible.
        There are major philosophies of education in the United States such as essentialism and
existentialism. Essentialism believes in a core curriculum with high standards supporting to get
back to basics. The focus of this philosophy is based “on the teaching of the essential elements of
academic and moral knowledge” (Sadker, 2016, p. 4). Essentialism support the idea that each
thing possesses attributes and characteristics that creates its identity and function. On the other
side, existentialism is focused in the belief of free will and the necessity of the individual to
develop his/her own future (Sadker, 2016). In the classroom, education is auto-controlled by the
students trying to find out what is the meaning of their lives. Compared to essentialism,
existentialism do not believe in “essence” or identity and consider that the existence precedes
PHILOSOPHY                                                                                          4
essence. In addition, through this philosophy, teachers should encourage students to practice
individual choices, teach that every action or decision has positive or negative results, explain to
students that they are responsible from themselves, and provide them with all the different
choices that they have in life (Drew, 2020).
       Each one of these philosophies impact, in any manner, the roles of students and teachers.
Essentialism is a student-centered philosophy that strives in the fact that teachers should develop
a curriculum and teach students the knowledge of society and civilization, environment, basic
laws, and education (Chandler, 2018). Through this philosophy, teachers should use traditional
approaches to instill students with the most important information or essential of the American
culture (Chandler, 2018). For the essentialism, teachers dominate the instruction, while students
receive the important and necessary knowledge. Perennialism is a teacher-centered philosophy
that believes that the ideas established centuries ago are the ones that should be directing the
students’ education (Chandler, 2018). Under this philosophy, teachers facilitates and/or coaches
students, while students engages discovery and construct their own knowledge. For this reason,
teachers develop a traditional and universal curriculum, in which the principal purpose in to
engage the minds of students. Therefore, the learning process of students is through reading and
analyze of the works of history’s great writer and philosophers (Chandler, 2018).
       Progressivism, social reconstructionism, and existentialism are student-centered
philosophies, in which the activities in the classroom are focused in the learning process of
students. Progressivism is a philosophical theory based in the fact that education should be
focused in the student rather than on the content of the curriculum. This is an active philosophy
in which students learn through questions about their experiences, problem solving, and thinking.
In this case, the role of teachers consist in provide experiences, such as the scientific method,
PHILOSOPHY                                                                                          5
based in the student’s interest so the students can learn by their own investigations (Oregon State
University, 1999). Social reconstructionism is a philosophy that believes in the improving of
society. For the implementation of this theory, teachers should develop a curriculum based in
social reform incorporating real problems such as violence, hunger, and inequality (Oregon State
University, 1999). Through social reconstructionism, students are encourage to dialog and
practice critical thinking to reinvent the world and create a social change. As mentioned
previously, existentialism supports the theory that students possess a complete freedom and
responsibility of their education (Drew, 2020). Under this philosophy, the role of teachers is to
provide the resources for students to explore all their choices and values and create a classroom
environment where students can express themselves through discussions or projects. On the
other side, students must determine their identity and values and take a complete responsibility
of these values and consequences (Drew, 2020).
PHILOSOPHY                                                                                        6
                                          References
Chandler, C. (2018). Similarities and Differences between Essentialism and Perennialism.
       Retrieved from: https://www.genesisuniversity.education/similarities-and-differences-
       between-essentialism-and-perennialism/
Drew, C. (2020). Existentialism in education – 7 Key features. Retrieved from:
       https://helpfulprofessor.com/existentialism-in-
       education/#Existentialism_in_the_Classroom
Encyclopaedia Britannica (2019). Philosophy. Retrieved from:
       https://www.britannica.com/topic/methodic-doubt
Florida State University (2019). What is Philosophy? Retrieved from:
       https://philosophy.fsu.edu/undergraduate-study/why-philosophy/What-is-Philosophy
Lewis, B. (2019). 10 questions to ask yourself to design your educational philosophy. Retrieved
       from: https://www.thoughtco.com/design-your-educational-philosophy-2081733
Oregon State University (1999). Section III – Philosophical Perspectives in Education. Retrieved
       from: https://oregonstate.edu/instruct/ed416/PP3.html
Sadker (2016). Philosophy of education. Retrieved from:
       http://highered.mheducation.com/sites/0072877723/student_view0/chapter9/index.html
Thomas, E., Kuria, G., Nyamwaka, E., & Nyakan, B. (2013). Philosophy as a key instrument in
       establishing curriculum, educational policy, objectives, goals of education, vision and
       mission of education. Journal of Education and Practice, 4(11), 95-101.
Writers Bureaus Centre (2017). An overview of the principles of curriculum design in education.
       Retrieved from: http://writersbureau.net/jede/an-overview-of-the-principles-of-
       curriculum-design/