Liver Biochemistries in Hospitalized Patients With COVID-19: Version of Record Doi: 10.1002/HEP.31326
Liver Biochemistries in Hospitalized Patients With COVID-19: Version of Record Doi: 10.1002/HEP.31326
This article has been accepted for publication and undergone full peer review but has not been
through the copyediting, typesetting, pagination and proofreading process, which may lead to
differences between this version and the Version of Record. Please cite this article as doi:
10.1002/HEP.31326
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved
or
Accepted Article
Raymond T. Chung, M.D.
Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital
55 Fruit Street, Warren 10
Boston, MA 02114
E-mail: chung.raymond@mgh.harvard.edu
Tel.: +1-617-726-5925
Abbreviations: AASLD, American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases; ALT, alanine
aminotransferase; ARDS, acute respiratory distress syndrome; AST, aspartate aminotransferase;
COVID-19, coronavirus disease 2019; CTCAE, Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events;
ESR, erythrocyte sedimentation rate; ICU, intensive care unit; MGH, Massachusetts General
Hospital; SARS-CoV-2, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2.
Financial Support: Dr. Bloom is a recipient of an American Association for the Study of Liver
Diseases (AASLD) Advanced Transplant Hepatology Award. Dr. Chung is supported by the
Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) Research Scholars Program.
The cause of elevated liver biochemistries in COVID-19 remains unclear. Postmortem liver biopsy of
one patient infected with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) found
moderate microvascular steatosis and mild lobular and portal activity.(11) Whether those changes can
be attributed to direct viral cytopathic effect, cytokine release associated with COVID-19, ischemia, a
preexisting condition, or the result of some other cause, such as drug-induced liver injury, remains
unclear. To further complicate the picture, myositis from COVID-19 could independently lead to AST
elevation.(12)
In our cohort, several experimental therapeutics were applied, both within and outside the bounds of
formal clinical trials. These medications included hydroxychloroquine, remdesivir, and 3-hydroxy-3-
methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors (statins). Although there are currently
no proven or approved treatments for COVID-19 and clinical data about statin use in this disease are
lacking, statins were recommended at our institution for some patients for several reasons: (1) Statins
may protect against the potentially severe cardiac complications of COVID-19; (2) they may enhance
innate immune response to certain viruses (including the SARS-like coronaviruses); and (3) they have
been studied and are safe in critical illnesses and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS).(13-16)
There are no published reports detailing the impact of statins on liver biochemistries in COVID-19.
In this study, we sought to clarify the trend of liver biochemistries during the illness course of
COVID-19 in hospitalized patients. We followed the first cohort of patients admitted to our center
with moderate to severe COVID-19 to evaluate the trend of their liver biochemistries, correlation of
Methods
Adults admitted to Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) with a positive SARS-CoV-2 real-time
polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) from Saturday, March 21, 2020, through Saturday, March 28,
2020, were followed by chart review until Friday, April 3, 2020. This study was deemed exempt by
our institutional review board.
Cohort
The diagnosis of COVID-19 was made by at least one positive SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR test performed
on nasopharyngeal swab samples. This assay was developed at MGH and authorized by the Food and
Drug Administration (FDA) under an emergency use authorization.
In accordance with our institutional clinical guidance, patients with COVID-19 were continued on a
statin if already prescribed. Medical teams were asked to consider starting atorvastatin 40 mg daily
unless there was a contraindication, such as creatine kinase greater than 500 U/L or ALT greater than
3 times the upper limit of normal. Based on our internal guidance at the time, patients with risk factors
for moderate or severe COVID-19, including at least one epidemiological and one vital sign or
laboratory value risk factor for severe disease (Supporting Table S1), were also initiated on
hydroxychloroquine for 5 days. Patients at this time were additionally considered for enrollment into
a blinded, placebo-controlled trial of remdesivir, an inhibitor of viral ribonucleic acid (RNA)-
dependent RNA polymerase.
The first 50 patients were included in the cohort consecutively. The subsequent 10 patients were
included consecutively but only those who had not been placed on statin therapy within the first 48
hours of admission. This change in cohort selection was made in an attempt to include more patients
off statin therapy.
Grade of hepatocellular liver injury was tabulated daily based on the Common Terminology Criteria
for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0 system.(17) (Supporting Table S2) The grades from 0 to 4
were based on multiples of gender-specific upper limits of normal (e.g., grade 1 = ALT or AST 1-3
times the upper limit of normal).
Statistical Analysis
Descriptive statistics were summarized using a mean and standard deviation (continuously measured)
or presented as proportions (categorical). The primary aim of our study was to describe the pattern of
liver biochemistries in patients admitted with COVID-19 over the course of their illness. These trends
were depicted with median daily values of liver biochemistries, including by key subgroups.
A secondary aim of our study was to explore associations of elevated liver biochemistries with other
markers of muscle injury and inflammation. At our institution, the reference ranges for AST, ALT,
alkaline phosphatase, creatine kinase, ESR, and ferritin vary by gender. A Pearson correlation
coefficient was performed for each comparison of gender-normalized laboratory values. Analyses
examining correlation of serologic parameters were adjusted for multiple comparisons using a
Bonferroni correction, and P < 0.01 was considered significant for those tests.
Finally, we aimed to assess the of ability of admission liver biochemistries to predict clinical
outcomes. A parametric t test or Fisher’s exact test was used to compare variables of interest between
binary outcomes. Univariate logistic regression was also used. All data were analyzed with SAS
version 9.4 (Cary, NC).
Results
A total of 60 patients with COVID-19 were admitted from March 21 through March 28, 2020, and
followed through April 3, 2020. Of these 60 patients, 4 (7%) had a prior diagnosis of chronic liver
disease, 48 (80%) were overweight or obese, and 41 (69%) had at least one abnormal liver
biochemistry on admission (Table 1). Hepatitis B and C viral testing was negative in 46 (77%) and 44
(73%) patients, respectively; positive in none; and not tested in the remainder. Median length of stay
at the end of the study period in the entire cohort was 9 days (range: 1-20 days) and in the sub-group
who remained admitted was 12 days (range 6 to 20 days).
Given that abnormal liver biochemistries were primarily limited to aminotransferases, patients were
stratified by peak grade of hepatocellular liver injury. Of 59 patients, 4 (7%) peaked at grade 0 (male:
AST <40 U/L or ALT <55 U/L; female: AST <32 U/L or ALT <33 U/L); 32 (54%) at grade 1 (male:
AST 41-120 U/L or ALT 34-99 U/L; female: AST 33-96 U/L or ALT 34-99 U/L); 13 (22%) at grade
AST was highly correlated with ALT on admission (r = 0.91; P < 0.0001) as well as every subsequent
day of admission (Supporting Fig. S2). In addition, peak AST correlated with peak ALT during
hospitalization (r = 0.97; P < 0.0001).
In the 10 patients who experienced grade 3-4 liver injury, AST was greater than ALT on 68% of
patient-days (Supporting Fig. S3). In 8 of 10 (80%) patients with grade 3-4 liver injury, the AST or
ALT began to rise within the first 4 days of admission. In the first 4 days, 5/10 (50%) were admitted
to the ICU, 5/10 (50%) were intubated, 4/10 (40%) were enrolled in a placebo-controlled remdesivir
trial, 6/10 (60%) were taking a statin, 9/10 (90%) received acetaminophen, and none were given
tocilizumab.
Patients continued on a home statin (n = 24) were older (65 vs. 53 years; P = 0.01) and more likely to
have diabetes (46% vs. 8%; P = 0.008) than those who started a new statin (n = 24; Supporting Table
S3). There was no difference in peak AST (P = 0.22), peak ALT (P = 0.15), peak creatine kinase (P =
0.41), or peak grade of liver injury (P = 0.20) between the two groups. In addition, patients newly
started on a statin were just as likely to have their statin stopped for elevated liver biochemistries
(23% vs. 23%; P = 1.00).
Patients who needed to stop statin therapy due to elevated liver biochemistries had higher admission
AST (78 vs. 43; P = 0.002) and admission ALT (60 vs. 33; P = 0.001) than those able to continue
statin therapy (Supporting Table S4). Also, a larger percentage of patients who needed to stop statins
were enrolled in the placebo-controlled remdesivir trial (70% vs. 32%; P = 0.04) than patients who
were able to continue statins. In some cases, the statin was discontinued in an effort to keep liver
biochemistries within the acceptable range for trial inclusion (inclusion and exclusion criteria for the
National Institutes of Health [NIH]-sponsored remdesivir trial; Supporting Table S5). Peak AST (P =
0.72), peak ALT (P = 0.82), and peak grade of liver injury (P = 0.78) did not differ between those
enrolled and not enrolled in the remdesivir trial.
Admission AST was higher in patients requiring intubation (69 vs. 49; P < 0.05; Table 3) but did not
predict ICU admission (odds ratio [OR], 1.01 [1.00, 1.03]; P = 0.09) or intubation (OR, 1.02 [1.00,
1.03]; P = 0.06) in univariate logistic regression. Patients requiring intubation had a higher peak
hepatocellular injury grade (2.1 vs. 1.3; P = 0.0005). Length of stay also rose with increasing grade of
liver injury (P = 0.03; Supporting Fig. S4).
The patients who died were older (78 vs. 55 years; P = 0.001) than the surviving patients. The patients
who died did not have higher peak grade of liver injury (P = 0.32), admission AST (P = 0.16), peak
AST (P = 0.48), or peak ALT (P = 0.26). Admission ALT was lower in those who died (20 vs. 42; P
= 0.03). Of the 6 patients who died, none required statin cessation due to elevated liver
biochemistries.
Discussion
This rate of abnormal liver biochemistries on admission is considerably higher than reported cohorts
in China.(1,2) This is despite a lower upper limit of normal for male AST and ALT in most Chinese
cohorts compared to ours.(3,4,8,9,18,19) Our findings are consistent with high rates of elevated admission
AST (58.4%) and ALT (39.0%) in a large New York cohort.(20) To our knowledge, ours is the first
published report to describe liver biochemistries over the course of hospitalization and in a cohort at
an American medical center. Of our cohort, 80% were overweight or obese, perhaps with
undiagnosed nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, which may explain some of the discrepancy from
Chinese cohorts. In addition, the bar for hospital admission may have differed, with sicker patients
being admitted to our institution. It has been demonstrated that patients with severe COVID-19 have
higher liver biochemistries.(8) Given the high incidence of abnormal liver biochemistries in our cohort,
we agree with the guidance from the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD)
that liver biochemistries should be monitored in all hospitalized patients with COVID-19.(21)
Viral hepatitis classically leads to an ALT-predominant hepatocellular injury; however, patients with
COVID-19 did not match that pattern. Given that AST is also produced in muscle and patients with
COVID-19 develop elevated markers of muscle injury, the AASLD and others have recommended
consideration of myositis or cardiac injury as contributors to the AST elevation.(12,21,22) In our cohort,
AST correlated moderately well with a marker specific to muscle injury on admission but not on
subsequent days or overall. Likewise, we hypothesized that the hepatitis in COVID-19 may be related
to the proinflammatory state associated with cytokine release. However, AST did not correlate with
markers specific to inflammation over the course of hospitalization. Instead, AST correlated very
strongly with ALT on admission and throughout the hospitalization. This suggests true hepatic injury
as the predominant source of aminotransferase elevation.
There are currently no proven or approved treatments for COVID-19. Statins are being considered as
a potential component of COVID-19 therapy for several reasons. First, cardiovascular complications
have been described as a result of COVID-19, and statin therapy could potentially mitigate that
risk.(13,14) Second, there is a theoretical role for statins in modulating the innate immune response of
viral respiratory infections—in particular, by inhibiting myeloid differentiation factor 88 (MYD88)
gene induction, which may be driven by SARS-like coronaviruses and precipitate
hyperinflammation.(15,28) Finally, statin use may be associated with less severe viral pneumonia.(29,30)
In our cohort, patients were not randomly placed on statin therapy and therefore statin users were
different in many ways from non-statin users, limiting our ability to make accurate comparisons.
Despite this limitation, there was no signal of increased liver injury in patients on statin therapy,
including those newly started on statins. Prior studies have found that the risk of statin-related drug-
induced liver injury is low overall and no higher in patients with baseline abnormal liver
Liver biochemistries were associated with disease severity and clinical outcomes. Admission AST
was higher in those requiring ICU stay and intubation but did not predict death. It should be noted,
however, that some patients remained intubated and critically ill at the end of our study period with a
median follow-up of 12 days. Degree of hepatocellular injury was associated with length of stay, ICU
admission, and intubation, but not death. This finding suggests that liver injury from COVID-19 is
associated with severe disease but is not associated with liver failure or risk of death. However, longer
follow-up in larger cohorts will be required to draw conclusions about the prognostic value of liver
biochemistries in this condition.
The results of this study must be interpreted within the context of study design. First, liver
biochemistries and other important laboratory markers were not assessed daily on every patient
because this was not required for clinical decision making. Second, given the context of numerous
simultaneous factors, including severity of viral illness, hemodynamic changes, and multiple
medications, it is challenging to tease apart the influence of medications, such as statins, on liver
biochemistries. To complicate matters, more than one-third of the cohort was enrolled in a blinded
placebo-controlled study of remdesivir, a potentially hepatotoxic antiviral medication. Given the
blinded status of that medication, we cannot control for its influence on biochemistries and outcomes.
Third, in order to present the medical community with prompt information in the setting of a rapidly
progressive pandemic, we have not been able to observe all clinical courses to completion. Future
studies will certainly be required to ascertain the potential of liver biochemistries to predict clinical
outcomes. Finally, with only a few cases of incompletely characterized chronic liver disease in this
cohort, we cannot draw conclusions about hepatic injury and other outcomes for those patients.
Acknowledgment: We thank Cheryl Nath, Meghan Lee, Ian Strohbehn, Arley Donovan, and Jasneet
Aneja, M.P.H., for their contributions to data collection.
2) Fan Z, Chen L, Li J, Cheng X, Yang J, Tian C, et al. Clinical features of COVID-19-related liver
damage. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2020. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2020.04.002. [Epub ahead of print]
4) Zhao D, Yao F, Wang L, Zheng L, Gao Y, Ye J, et al. A comparative study on the clinical
features of COVID-19 pneumonia to other pneumonias. Clin Infect Dis 2020. doi:
10.1093/cid/ciaa247. [Epub ahead of print]
5) Zheng YY, Ma YT, Zhang JY, Xie X. COVID-19 and the cardiovascular system. Nat Rev Cardiol
2020;17:259-260.
6) Bangash MN, Patel J, Parekh D. COVID-19 and the liver: little cause for concern. Lancet
Gastroenterol Hepatol 2020. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(20)30084-4. [Epub ahead of print]
7) Huang C, Wang Y, Li X, Ren L, Zhao J, Hu Y, et al. Clinical features of patients infected with
2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China. Lancet 2020;395:497-506.
11) Xu Z, Shi L, Wang Y, Zhang J, Huang L, Zhang C, et al. Pathological findings of COVID-19
associated with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Lancet Respir Med 2020;8:420-422.
13) Shi S, Qin M, Shen B, Cai Y, Liu T, Yang F, et al. Association of cardiac injury with mortality in
hospitalized patients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China. JAMA Cardiol 2020. doi:
10.1001/jamacardio.2020.0950. [Epub ahead of print]
15) Yuan S. Statins may decrease the fatality rate of Middle East respiratory syndrome infection.
mBio 2015;6:e01120-15.
16) Agus A, Hulme C, Verghis RM, McDowell C, Jackson C, O’Kane CM, et al. Simvastatin for
patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome: long-term outcomes and cost-effectiveness from a
randomised controlled trial. Crit Care 2017;21:108-017-1695-0.
17) National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute, U.S. Department of Health and Human
Services. Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0.
https://ctep.cancer.gov/protocolDevelopment/electronic_applications/docs/CTCAE_v5_Quick_Refere
nce_8.5x11.pdf. Published November 27, 2017. Accessed March 25th, 2020.
18) Chen T, Wu D, Chen H, et al. Clinical characteristics of 113 deceased patients with
coronavirus disease 2019: Retrospective study. BMJ. 2020;368:m1091.
20) Richardson S, Hirsch JS, Narasimhan M, et al. Presenting characteristics, comorbidities, and
outcomes among 5700 patients hospitalized with COVID-19 in the new york city area. JAMA.
2020.
21) Fix OK, Hameed B, Fontana RJ, Kwok RM, McGuire BM, Mulligan DC, et al. Clinical best
practice advice for hepatology and liver transplant providers during the COVID-19 pandemic:
AASLD expert panel consensus statement. HEPATOLOGY 2020. doi: 10.1002/hep.31281. [Epub ahead
of print]
22) Bloom PP. A call to action: novel ways that hepatologists can contribute to patient care during the
COVID-19 pandemic. Dig Dis Sci 2020. doi: 10.1007/s10620-020-06251-0.
23) Zhang Y, Xiao M, Zhang S, Xia P, Cao W, Jiang W, et al. Coagulopathy and antiphospholipid
antibodies in patients with COVID-19. N Engl J Med 2020;382:e38.
24) Tang N, Li D, Wang X, Sun Z. Abnormal coagulation parameters are associated with poor
prognosis in patients with novel coronavirus pneumonia. J Thromb Haemost 2020;18:844-847.
25) Gordon DE, Jang GM, Bouhaddou M, Xu J, Obernier K, O’Meara MJ, et al. A SARS-CoV-2-
human protein-protein interaction map reveals drug targets and potential drug-repurposing. bioRxiv
2020. doi: 10.1101/2020.03.22.002386.
26) Papic N, Pangercic A, Vargovic M, Barsic B, Vince A, Kuzman I. Liver involvement during
influenza infection: perspective on the 2009 influenza pandemic. Influenza Other Respir Viruses
2012;6:e2-e5.
27) Blanco-Melo D, Nilsson-Payant BE, Liu WC, Uhl S, Hoagland D, Møller R, et al. Imbalanced
host response to SARS-CoV-2 drives development of COVID-19. Cell 2020. doi:
10.1016/j.cell.2020.04.026.
29) Frost FJ, Petersen H, Tollestrup K, Skipper B. Influenza and COPD mortality protection as
pleiotropic, dose-dependent effects of statins. Chest 2007;131:1006-1012.
30) Vandermeer ML, Thomas AR, Kamimoto L, Reingold A, Gershman K, Meek J, et al. Association
between use of statins and mortality among patients hospitalized with laboratory-confirmed influenza
virus infections: a multistate study. J Infect Dis 2012;205:13-19.
31) Chalasani N, Aljadhey H, Kesterson J, Murray MD, Hall SD. Patients with elevated liver enzymes
are not at higher risk for statin hepatotoxicity. Gastroenterology 2004;126:1287-1292.
32) Russo MW, Hoofnagle JH, Gu J, Fontana RJ, Barnhart H, Kleiner DE, et al. Spectrum of statin
hepatotoxicity: experience of the drug-induced liver injury network. HEPATOLOGY 2014;60:679-686.
33) Sinha P, Delucchi KL, Thompson BT, McAuley DF, Matthay MA, Calfee CS, et al. Latent class
analysis of ARDS subphenotypes: a secondary analysis of the statins for acutely injured lungs from
sepsis (SAILS) study. Intensive Care Med 2018;44:1859-1869.
FIG. 2. Caption: Trend and correlation of AST and creatine kinase over time
FIG A: Descriptive text: Mean AST and creatine kinase were divided by the gender-specific upper
limit of normal are depicted over time for all patients. Daily Pearson correlation between these two
values are depicted below the figure, along with P-value.
FIG B: Descriptive text: Mean AST and creatine kinase were divided by the gender-specific upper
limit of normal are depicted over time only for the patients with peak grade 3-4 liver injury.
FIG. 3. Caption: Correlation between AST and inflammatory markers over time.
Supporting FIG. S1. Alkaline phosphatase and total bilirubin over time.
FIG A: Descriptive text: Median alkaline phosphatase over time.
FIG B: Descriptive text: Median total bilirubin over time.
Supporting FIG. S2. Caption: Correlation between AST and ALT over time.
Supporting FIG. S3. Individual liver biochemistry trends in those with grade 3-4 injury. Descriptive
text. RDV trial refers to patients enrolled in the NIH-sponsored placebo-controlled remdesivir trial.
We remain blinded and do not know to which arm patients were randomized.
Age, years 57 ± 17
Diabetes 14 (23%)
Cirrhosis 1 (2%)
AST, U/L 55 ± 37
ALT, U/L 39 ± 24
Levels (U/L)
80
AST/ALT
60
AST
40
ALT
20
0
Day 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
N 58 47 50 43 40 38 34 28 30 23 20 17 15 10
40
Grade 0 4
Levels (U/L)
30
AST/ALT
20 AST
ALT
10
0
Day 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
N 4 2 3 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grade 1 32 100
80
Levels (U/L)
AST/ALT
60
AST
40 ALT
20
0
Day 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
N 31 23 26 20 17 17 15 11 13 9 8 5 4 1
Grade 2 13 150
Levels (U/L)
100
AST/ALT
AST
50 ALT
0
Day 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
N 13 12 11 11 12 11 10 9 9 8 7 7 6 5
200
Grade 3-4 10
Levels (U/L)
150
AST/ALT
100 AST
ALT
50
0
Day 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
N 10 10 10 10 10 9 9 8 8 6 5 5 5 4
hep_31326_f1.eps
Accepted Article 4
3.5
2.5
AST
2
Creatine kinase
1.5
0.5
0
Day 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
.74 .56 .33 .32 .44 .10 .09 -.07 -.15 .13 .33 -.07 -.02 .005
r
<.0001 .0003 .06 .06 .02 .59 .67 .74 .50 .60 .21 .79 .95 .99
P
B
12
Lab value/upper limit of normal
AST
10
Creatine kinase
8
0
Day 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
0.8
Correlation (r) with AST
0.6
ESR
0.4
C-reactive protein
Ferritin
0.2
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
-0.2
-0.4
Day of admission
hep_31326_f3.eps