M2A2 Discussion Chapter 3 Questions 1-3
MAN4442
1. What is the relationship among property rights, corruption, and economic progress? How
important are anticorruption efforts in the effort to improve a country’s level of economic
development?
Property rights, or legal rights over the use of resources (property) for income, are very
important to any business. According to the textbook, strong legal protection of
property rights is required for innovation and entrepreneurial activity to take place in
the market. This results in economic growth for that business or area. Without these
rights- no business would come out with new ideas. It would not be profitable when
anyone can take that property and use it as their own. Corruption in relation to property
rights takes place when state bureaucrats grant company a license to do business in a
certain area. It is extremely important that anticorruption efforts take place in areas
such as Haiti, which have been affected economically. With better protection and
definition of property rights, Haiti would be able to get out of poverty.
2. You are a senior manager in a U.S. automobile company considering whether to invest in
production facilities in China, Russia, or Germany. These facilities will serve local market
demand. Evaluate the benefits, costs, and risks associated with doing business in each nation.
Which country seems the most attractive target for foreign direct investment? Why?
When deciding where to do business, the risks of choosing China outweigh the benefits.
China is not a free country and is mostly unfree in terms of economic freedom. This can
cause a strain on profitability. The benefits of China include being amongst the upper
middle income bracket and having medium human development, compared globally.
Russia’s economic environment is very similar to China’s, given the communist
ideologies. Russia is only slightly worse off than China in terms of income level, but
shares the same freedom levels. After looking over the maps from Chapter 3 of the
textbook (and using my knowledge as a senior manager), I believe that Germany would
be the best choice for doing this international business. Germany is the most relatable
to the U.S. With high income and human development, as well as being mostly free
economically. Germany and the U.S. have the same average annual growth rate making
this automobile company likely to reach its goals there.
3. Reread the Country Focus on India, and answer the following questions:
(1) What kind of economic system did India operate under during 1947- 1990? What kind of
system is it moving towards today? What are the impediments to completing this
transformation?
India adopted a democratic system of government and had a mixed economy during the
years 1947-1990. The economy mostly consisted of state-owned companies, subsidies,
and central planning. After 1991 many business sectors were opened to the private
enterprises in an effort to increase wealth and GDP. Political opposition impedes further
transformation in India still today. Laws in place make it difficult to thrive in the private
sector in this country.
(2) How might widespread public ownership of businesses and extensive government
regulations have affected the (a) the efficiency of state and private businesses and (b)
the rate of new business formation in India during the 1947-1990 time frame? How do
you think these factors affected the rate of economic growth in India during this time
frame?
The public or state ownership of enterprises, along with regulations and tariffs enforced
in India, caused widespread economic distress. Strict laws and regulations on
production, as well as large barriers for government permission made it impossible to be
efficient and profitable. These large barriers also made the rate of new business
formation in the private sector slow. The slow development resulted in an extremely
low GDP compared to India’s huge population. The economy was completely unable to
prosper without the help of the private sector.
(3) How would privatization, deregulation, and the removal of barriers to foreign direct
investment affect the efficiency of business, new business formation, and the rate of
economic growth in India during the post-1990 time period?
In India post-1990 the economy has expanded. GDP and foreign direct investment grew
exponentially over the next 20 years. The private sector was given the ability to develop
into a thriving economy after the regulation and barriers were removed. Today India is
actually has a position in the global market and is more successful.
(4) India now has pockets of strengths in key high- technology industries such as software
and pharmaceuticals. Why do you think India is developing strengths in these areas?
How might success in these industries help generate growth in the other sectors on the
Indian economy?
India has emerged with strengths in areas such as pharmaceuticals due to their ability to
produce them at a low cost- therefore creating high profit. With such a large and
growing population, it is no wonder these areas have become so important. The
increase in profit generated by these practices have gone back into the Indian economy,
helping everyone else grow as well.
(5) Given what is now occurring in the Indian economy, do you think the country represents
an attractive target for inward investment by foreign multinationals selling consumer
products? Why?
I think that India is an attractive target for investment due to its rapidly expanding
economy. India continues to flourish while still dealing with the lasting effects of the
previous era. The challenges facing India today are still being worked out and in the
future I believe that India will continue to increase wealth.
References:
Hill, C. W., & Hult, G. T. (2016). Global business today (Ninth ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Education
Create.