Bioenergy
–
An
Introduc1on
TSS
Consultants
• TSS
established
in
1986
–
principal
focus
was
biomass
to
power
• Con1nue
to
assist
project
developers,
government
agencies,
u1li1es,
and
tribal
en11es
with
bioenergy
development
and
projects
–
biopower,
biogas,
biofuels,
and
bioproducts
What
is
Biomass?
• Biomass
–
any
solid,
nonhazardous,
cellulosic
material
derived
from:
forest-‐related
resources,
solid
wood
wastes,
agricultural
wastes,
and
plants
grown
exclusively
as
a
fuel.*
*based
on
the
defini1on
of
biomass
in
the
2005
Energy
Act
3
Benefits of Biomass
• Renewable energy, transportation fuels, and bio-based products
• Domestic source of energy
• Provides baseload electricity
• Healthy forests/reduce wildfire danger
• Turning a waste into a product
• Air quality benefits
• Greenhouse gas reduction
• Rural economic development
• Promoted by federal, state, and even local policy
4
Why
are
healthy
forests
important?
Forest
Thinning
and
Bioenergy
• Wildfire
hazard
is
reduced
by
removing
excess
biomass
fuel
• Power
genera1on
technology
in
small,
distributed
system
has
advanced
• Such
power
plants
provide
a
place
to
take
the
hazardous
fuels
(rather
than
pile/burn)
• However,
with
this
poten1al
opportuni1es
come
the
challenge
of
costs
Posi1ve
Effects
of
Fuel
Treatments
Thinned
Fire
Un-‐thinned
Cone
Wilfire,
Lassen
Na1onal
Forest,
September
2002
Woody
Biomass
Energy
Produc1on
-‐
Reduces
Overall
Emissions
from
Open
Burning
Controlled
Facility
Combus1on
1-‐5
lbs
of
pollutant
released
to
atmosphere
per
ton
of
fuel
Uncontrolled
Open
Combus1on
20-‐200
lbs
of
pollutant
released
to
atmosphere
per
ton
of
fuel
Graphic
courtesy
of
Placer
County
Air
Pollu1on
Control
District
New
Influencing
Factors
Effec1ng
Bioenergy
Facili1es
• Growing
waste
disposal
issues/opportuni1es
• Renewable
energy
gov’t
mandates/incen1ves
• New
financial
and
owner
groups
looking
for
renewable
energy
business
deals
• Fossil
fuel
pricing
–
abrupt
current
and
future
price
increases
• Accelera1on
in
the
development
of
new
biomass
to
energy
conversion
technologies
• Greenhouse
gas
reduc1on
opportuni1es
9
CA
Bioenergy
Ac1on
Plan
• The
2012
Bioenergy
Ac/on
Plan
is
a
coordinated
California
state
agency
approach
to
addressing
challenges
and
maximizing
opportuni1es
for
the
development
of
bioenergy
projects
that
promote
economic
development
and
provide
the
greatest
environmental
benefit
• The
plan
outlines
California
state
agency
ac1ons
that:
1) S1mulate
cost-‐effec1ve
u1liza1on
of
the
California’s
diverse
biomass
resources
for
conversion
to
“low-‐carbon”
biofuels,
biogas,
and
renewable
electricity;
2) Increase
research,
development
and
demonstra1on
of
bioenergy
toward
commercializing
new
technologies;
3) Streamline
the
regulatory
and
permigng
processes;
and
4) Quan1fy
and
mone1ze
the
benefits
of
bioenergy.
SB
1122
• Enacted
in
2012
• Requires
250
megawaks
of
biomass
power
procurement:
-‐
110
megawaks
from
wastewater
treatment,
organic
waste
diversion,
food
processing,
and
codiges1on
-‐
90
megawaks
from
dairies
and
agricultural
waste
-‐
50
megawa6s
from
sustainable
forest-‐sourced
biomass
• Rules
being
developed
at
CPUC
under
the
Renewable
Market
Adjus1ng
Tariff
(Re-‐MAT)
proceeding
Reducing the Carbon Impact
12
Carbon
“Neutral”
(a
simple
approach)
• Biomass
absorbs
carbon
dioxide
during
growth
of
wood
and
green
materials,
and
emits
it
during
conversion
• It
recycles
the
carbon
and
does
not
add
to
the
greenhouse
effect
• It
displaces
fossil
fuel
13
Woody
Biomass
U1liza1on
A
variety
of
value-‐added
end
uses
have
evolved
over
1me
–
Some
are
commercially
proven
and
some
are
s1ll
in
the
RD
&
D
Phases
• Lumber
products,
composite
panels,
pulp
•
Soil
amendments
•
Landscape/landfill
cover
•
Biomass
power
•
Bio-‐based
products
(plas1cs,
solvents,
etc.)
•
Biofuels
(ethanol,
renewable
diesel)
14
Using
Biomass
15
Bioenergy
Power
and
Fuels
16
Technology
Evalua1on
&
Selec1on
• Search
for
most
appropriate
technology
considering
project
loca1on
and
biomass
supply
ü Ability
to
convert
local
supply
into
heat,
power,and/or
transporta1on
fuels
ü Must
meet
local
permigng
specifica1ons
• Technology
should
be
proven
ü Operates
efficiently
on
available
biomass
supply
ü Operates
cleanly
on
available
biomass
supply
ü Appropriate
for
site
and
local/regional
resources
Biopower
–
a.k.a
Bioelectricity
Pellets
Wood
Chips
Gasifica1on
v.
Combus1on
• Gaseous
fuel
more
versa1le
• Small
scale
thermal
use
very
than
solid
fuel
well
commercialized
• Lower
emissions
(air
and
(hundreds
of
vendors)
water)
• However,
the
integra1on
of
• Less
expensive
labor
needed
electricity
genera1on
(via
at
facility
steam
cycle)
is
very
limited
• Produces
bio-‐char,
an
added
on
the
small-‐scale.
value
product
• Higher
air
and
water
• However,
syngas
cleanup
is
emissions,
as
well
as
higher
s1ll
an
issue…
water
supply
needs.
Combus1on
Technology
Chiptec
Advanced
Recycling
AESI
Uniconfort
Biotec
Global
Hurst
Solagen
Gasifica1on
Gasifica1on
converts
biomass
to
a
combus1ble
gas
(a.k.a.
syngas)
Reliable
Renewables
(Biogen)
Phoenix
Energy
(Ankur)
Nexterra
Radian
Bioenergy
West
Biofuels
PHG
All
Power
Labs
More
Energy
Conversion
Technologies
Biomass
Thermal
• Can
be
part
of
biopower
project
–
using
waste
heat
(combinded
heat
and
power)
ü Improve
efficiency
ü Improve
economics
Biomass
Thermal
• Can
be
stand
alone
for
space
and
process
heat
in
lieu
of
more
expensive
fossil
fuels
The
Unique
Role
of
Biomass
in
Transpora1on
Fuels
The growing need for sustainable
electric power can be met by other
renewables, but…
…our demand for carbon-based
liquid fuels and chemicals can only be
met by biomass
Biofuels
• Cellulose
to
biofuels
is
coming
–
facili1es
are
under
construc1on
and
beginning
to
produce
fuel
• Transporta1on
fuel
diversity
and
security
• Poten1al
value-‐
added
use
for
forest
biomass
Three
Primary
Pathways
to
Fuels
è
A
potential
fourth
pathway
is
to
Renewable
CNG
Types
of
Biofuels
• Ethanol
• Renewable
Diesel
and
Gasoline
(“Drop-‐in
Fuels”)
• Bio-‐0il
(needs
upgrade)
• Biomethane
(Renewable
CNG)
• Butanol
• Methanol
• Dimethyl
Ether
(DME)
Biochemical
Technology
Thermochemical
Processes
• Fast
Pyrolysis
(Bio-‐oil)
• Gasifica1on
(Syngas)
• Plasma
Gasifica1on
(Syngas)
• R&D
Needs
ü Syngas
cleanup
ü Cataly1c
conversion
to
liquid
fuels
ü Bio-‐oil
stability
Fast
Pyrolysis
and
Bio-‐Oil
Source: “Biomass Fast Pyrolysis” A.V. Bridgwater, 2004
The
Uniqueness
of
Bio-‐Oil
Source:
“Biomass
Fast
Pyrolysis”
A.V.
Bridgwater,
2004
Forest
Biomass-‐Based
Biofuels
• Benefits
ü Economic
s1mula1on
-‐
Poten1al
long-‐term
market
for
forest
biomass
waste
ü Various
environmental
benefits
–
greatly
reduced
carbon
emissions,
improved
air
quality,
improved
forest
health
ü Renewability
ü Energy
security
ü Poten1al
for
less
expensive
fuel
(in
the
future)
Forest
Biomass-‐Based
Biofuels
• Drawbacks
ü Current
higher
costs
of
feedstock
from
forests
ü Biofuel
produc1on
facili1es
may
need
to
be
large
with
significant
ini1al
capital
costs
ü Need
for
extensive
infrastructure
to
supply
large
facility
ü Lower
energy
output
for
current
principal
biofuels
Even
More
Energy
Conversion
Technologies
Torrefac1on
• Process
ü Thermochemical
treatment,
similar
to
roas1ng
(pyrolysis)
ü Separates
water,
some
VOCs,
&
hemicellulose
in
woody
biomass,
leaving
cellulose
&
lignin
at
200-‐300°C
ü Produces
a
carbonaceous
residue,
lignin
when
warm
acts
as
a
binder
during
pelle1za1on
(when
applicable)
ü Results
yield
66%-‐75%
of
the
original
mass
Torrefaction
• Benefits
ü Higher
Energy
Content
(per
unit
volume)
ü Lower
Moisture
Content
ü Makes
biomass
hydrophobic
ü Lower
Transport
Costs
ü Outdoor
storage
ü Negligible
decomposi1on
or
mold
ü Longer
life
without
fuel
degrada1on
ü Smoke
producing
compound
removed
ü Homogeneous
fuel
when
pelle1zed
ü Higher
lignin
frac1on
than
green
wood,
yielding
a
stronger
pellet
Price
range:
$70
to
$110
per
ton
Primary
market:
Cofiring
w/coal,
mostly
Europe
Torrefaction
• Drawbacks
ü Low
Volume
enhancement
ü 10%
loss
of
original
energy
content
ü All
ash
components
are
s1ll
present
ü Addi1onal
processing
adds
cost
ü Limited
commercial
opera1ons
in
U.S.
ü Limited
use
in
U.S.
Biochar
• Process
ü Thermochemical
treatment,
developed
through
gasifica1on
ü Separates
water,
VOCs,
&
hemicellulose
in
woody
biomass.
Also
breaks
the
cellulosic
structure
of
the
wood
at
700-‐1000°C
ü Produces
a
carbonaceous
residue
Biochar
can
be
between
75%-‐85%
fixed
carbon
ü Results
yield
7%-‐20%
of
the
original
mass
Biochar
• Benefits
ü High
fixed
carbon
content
makes
it
ideal
for
soil
amendment
Retains
about
50%
of
the
total
carbon
in
15%
of
the
mass
ü Moisture
Content
is
effec1vely
0%.
Makes
biomass
hydrophobic
Lower
transport
costs
Outdoor
storage
ü Negligible
decomposi1on
or
mold
Longer
life
without
fuel
degrada1on
ü Can
be
a
byproduct
of
syngas
produc1on
Price
range:
$500
to
$4,500
per
ton
Primary
market:
Soil
amendment
Biochar
• Drawbacks
ü When
biochar
is
the
primary
product,
the
yield
per
unit
input
is
very
low,
for
1
ton
of
biochar,
a
gasifier
must
consume
5-‐10
tons
of
wood
feedstock
–
syngas
produced
and
must
be
flared
if
not
used
for
energy
source
ü Expensive
to
process
biochar
into
a
combus1ble
form,
biochar
is
typically
crushed
through
the
gasifica1on
process
(by
screw
augurs)
Three
Major
Components
For
a
Viable
Bioenergy
Project
• Supply
• Market
• Financing
54
Principal
Components
of
Bioenergy
Project
• Resource
Assessment
• Si1ng
and
Environmental
• Technology
Selec1on
• Project
Economics/Financial
Analysis
• Design
and
Construct
Biomass
Resource
Assessment
–
What
is
necessary
to
know?
• Sustainable
long
term
supply
located
within
close
proximity
(<
50
miles)
• Economically
available
• Environmentally
available
• Meets
quality
specifica1ons
• Available
in
quan11es
and
from
diverse
sources
that
support
project
financing
ü Minimum
10
year
supply,
70%
under
contract
ü At
least
2.5
–
3
1mes
facility
usage
(fuel
supply
coverage
ra1o
Biomass
Resource
Assessment
–
Doing
the
Assessment
• Assess
available
resources
within
a
physical
and
economic
boundary
• Begin
with
available
data
and
informa1on
• Interview
poten1al
sources
and
others
knowledgeable
of
local
and
regional
biomass
resources
• Scaling
the
poten1al
facility
Resource
Assessment
Mapping
Poten1al
Environmental
Regulatory
Permigng
and
Si1ng
Issues
•
Air
Quality
•
Water
Use
&
Discharge
•
Land
Use
•
Transporta1on
•
Biological
Resources
•
Noise
•
Cultural
Resources
•
Visual/Aesthe1cs
Air
Quality
Permigng
for
Biomass
Power
• Principal
air
pollutants
of
concern:
ü NOx
(ozone
precusor)
ü PM
ü VOC
(ozone
precusor)
ü CO
ü HAPs
(par1cularly
HCl)
• Size
of
plant
and
associated
emissions
cri1cal
Which
one
are
you
building?
This
one?
or
this
one?
• Minor Source
or
• Minor Source
Water
Quality
Permigng
for
Biomass
Power
•
Water
Use
•
Water
and
Wastewater
Discharge
ü
Non-‐contact
cooling
water
ü
Waste
water
•
Storm
Water
ü
Construc1on
ü
Opera1on
ü
Storm
Water
Pollu1on
Preven1on
Plan
Land
Use
Permigng
for
Biomass
Power
• Si1ng
and
Land
Use
• Zoning
• Condi1onal
or
Special
Use
Permits
• Community
Acceptance
• California
Environmental
Quality
Act
Land
Use
Permits
&
Zoning
• County
or
City
Planning/Community
Development
Department
• Zoning
must
be
Industrial
(or
need
for
zoning
change)
• Condi1onal
Use
Permits
usually
needed
CEQA!
•
CEQA
–
The
California
Environmental
Quality
Act
•
Purpose
–
to
inform
the
public
of
environmental
decisions
by
CA
agencies
(such
as
approving
permits)
•
Public
process
driven
•
For
bioenergy
facili1es
usually
led
by
land
use
or
air
quality
agencies
•
Not
generally
applicable
on
tribal
land
Basic
CEQA
Components
• Environmental
Informa1on
Form
• Environmental
Checklist
&
Ini1al
Study
• CEQA
Determina1on
ü Exempted
ü Nega1ve
Declara1on
ü Mi1gated
Neg
Dec
ü Focused
EIR
ü Full
EIR
NEPA
–
“CEQA
Lite”
• Used
for
federal
projects
(ini1a1ng,
funding,
or
approval)
• Three
levels
of
documenta1on
depending
on
complexity
and
impacts
ü
Categorical
Exclusion
ü
Environmental
Assessment
Which
may
lead
to
a
FONSI
or…
ü
Environmental
Impact
Statement
Other
Poten1al
Environmental
Issues
•
Transporta1on
•
Biological
Resources
•
Noise
•
Cultural
Resources
•
Visual/Aesthe1cs
Regulatory
Rapport
• Framing
the
biomass
project
and
its
posi1ve
akributes
• Understanding
the
system
and
the
regulatory
necessi1es
• Pre-‐applica1on
discussions
• Developing
permigng
&
compliance
strategies
California
air
quality
as
an
example
CA
Air
Quality
Permigng
• High
order
of
complexity
due
to:
ü Air quality constraints
ü 35 separate air districts
ü Voluminous regulations at state and district levels
Air
Quality
Constraints
• Many
of
the
CA
Air
Districts
are
in
non-‐akainment
for
NOx
and
PM
• Akainment
v.
Non-‐akainment
• Emissions
controls
par1cularly
important
in
CA
• Need
for
offset
emissions
–
are
they
available
and
at
what
cost?
U.S.
Dept.
of
Redundancy
Department
Federal
&
Tribal
Federal
Agencies/Tribal
En11es
vs.
State
and
Local
Control
• Federal
Land
Management
Agencies
•
Environmental
Protec1on
Agency
•
May
use
local/state
standards
•
Tribal
Environmental
Departments
Project
Economics
• Sustainable
and
economical
fuel
supply
ü Fuel/feedstock
supply
typically
represents
the
highest
variable
cost
for
a
biomass
facility
• Exis1ng
incen1ves
ü Produc1on
Tax
Credits
ü Business
Energy
Tax
Credits
ü Local
incen1ves
–
enterprise
zone
• Markets
for
power,
heat,
fuels,
and
byproducts
ü Market
support
jus1fies
capital
investment
• Return
on
investment
ü Return
on
Investment
(ROI)
of
20%+
75
TSS
Financial
Analysis
Components
&
Assump1ons
• System
variables
–
amount
of
electricity,
capacity
• Economic
variables
–
heat
sales,
biochar
sales
• Biomass
facility
parameters
–
heat
off
take
• Biomass
feedstock
–
hea1ng
value,
feedstock
cost
(very
important)
• Expenses
–
capex
and
O&M
• Taxes
and
incen1ves
• Financing
–
type
and
cost,
ROI
needed
Financial
analysis
results
in
the
price
of
electricity
needed
The
Challenges
• High
cost
of
feedstock
(collec1on,
processing
and
transport).
• No
ability
to
pass
through
increased
cost
of
labor/diesel
fuel
to
PPA
• Financial
markets
are
hesitant
to
support
early
phase
technologies
(gasifica1on)
• Not
all
stakeholders
(e.g.,
CBD)
are
on
board
• Small
scale
biopower
economies
of
scale
ALL
OF
THE
ABOVE
TRANSLATE
INTO
SIGNIFICANT
COSTS
Biomass
Project
Funding
• Grants
• Low
cost
loans
and
loan
guarantees
• Private
equity
• Various
combina1ons
of
the
above
Frederick
Tornatore
Chief
Technology
Officer
TSS
Consultants
fatoxic
@tssconsultants.com