Project Report: Economic Growth in Asia
Project Report: Economic Growth in Asia
Project Report
(Submitted for the degree of B.Com Honors in Accounting & Finance
Submitted By:
Supervised By:
June-2020
1
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
I would like to thank all the people involved, directly and indirectly
who contributed their time and effort for the completion of this
project, “Economic growth and Environment in Asia”.
VAIBHAV GUPTA
B.COM (H)
2
INDEX
CHAPTERS PAGE
1. Introduction 4-5
-2.6 Overfishing 18
-3.6
Cooperation 29
-4.2 Conclusion 30
6. Annexures 32-33
3
1. INTRODUCTION
Asia is the world’s largest continent, encompassing about 30% of the surface area. It has
both the highest and lowest points on the surface of the earth along with longest
coastline with climatic extremities. It also produces the most varied forms of vegetation
and animal life on earth; one could witness the broadest variety of human adaptation in
Asia as compared to any of the other continents.
Despite of the most staggering features of the continent, the entire region is facing
environmental crisis at the expense of development. This outcome had already been
foreseen as the world approached the end of 20 th century. The economic discipline
followed by most western and first world countries was based on the sole principle of
evolving first and worrying about the environment later. It is now widely accepted that
long term economic growth requires not just accumulation of technology and other
forms of capital and labour but also the preservation of the natural capital base.
Environmental degradation and economic growth are directly related as most factors of
production may be replaceable or substitutable but are still finite. Once damaged, they
might be unusable for long periods and fixing the problem is an expensive and
protracted process. As these natural systems are the primary sources of food and clean
water, their degradation through various forms of pollution and overuse has raised
concerns in academics and policy-makers around the globe.
The most important message for this region, an economic powerhouse, would be to not
undermine the damage being done to the environment at the expense of their rapid
growth and instead make sure that the damage is accounted for. Even so, a whole new
scenario arises as urbanization reaches the remote corners of this region, and the
demand for commodities produced by the prospect of consuming environmental capital
becomes a necessity. Meeting these demands of numerous, wealthier and urbanized
people becomes a cause as well.
Clean and ample supply of water, arable land and clean air are the vital ecosystem
necessities for sustaining life and thus ensuring Asia’s emergence as the engine of the
global economy. However, in recent times the strategies for economic expansions come
at the cost of the environment and if continues to proceed on this trajectory, will
progressively hinder future development.
4
Environmental damage not only affects the sustainability of growth but also puts future
welfare at risk and might even extract welfare costs to deal with the current conditions.
Sections of people residing in rural areas with low income mostly depend on
environmental sources/ the primary sources. Their financial condition compels them to
live under harsh conditions as it is and finding alternatives to a contaminated water
source or compromised cooking fuels amidst this crisis affects their livelihoods on a
huge scale. Apart from this problems such as their capacity to earn, receive education
and several health problems arise.
Even though progress might not be easy it would still be a step towards sustainability of
environment with respect to economic growth. This study will illustrate the complexity
of these problems, showcase how difficult it would be to lessen them and why
persistence, if not worsening, seems like the only feasible reality to construct and base
social policies upon.
5
1.1 LITERATURE REVIEW
Extant Literature provides us with valuable insights into issues we are seeking to
uncover and analyze.
For instance a paper published under the forum of ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS 15 (1995)
91- 95 states that 1) National and international policy has usually ignored the
environment. 2) There’s a general proposition that economic growth is good for the
environment and it has been justified by the claim that an empirical relation exists
between per capita income and some measures of environmental quality. It has been
observed that as income increases there is an increase in environmental degradation as
well, but up to a certain point, after which environment quality improves.
Arrow et al. 1995, Dasgupta 1996 states that towards the end of the 20 th century, the
economic discipline began to seriously acknowledge the central importance of
environmental sustainability to the process of economic development.
According to (Brock and Taylor 2005, OECD 2011) it is now widely accepted that long
term economic growth not only requires the accumulation of technology, physical
capital and labour but also the preservation of natural resources.
In 1987 the United Nations Report on sustainable development foresaw the need for “a
new era of economic growth, one that must be based on policies that sustain and
expand the environmental resource base” (WCED 1987).
Nobel Laureate- Michael Spence, chairing the Commission of Growth and Development
( and one of the senior developing-country economic policymakers (including from the
People’s Republic of China, India and Indonesia) said:
It is only a slight exaggeration to say that most developing countries decide to grow first
and worry about the environment later. This is a costly mistake… The poor suffer the
most from many kinds of pollution… Early attention to environmental standards serves
the interests of equity as well as growth.
6
1.2 OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY
- To have a complete idea about the major environmental problems in Asia
7
1.3 REASEARCH METHODOLOGY
AREA OF STUDY:
With the economic growth of countries, environment has been seen to take the toll. Asia,
which is home to various developing countries like India, Bangladesh, and Global superpower
country like China, what are the repercussions on the environment. The economy of any
nation operates under its social paradigms embedded within the natural world, and thus to
meet its demands it might affect the environment and vice versa.
TYPE OF STUDY:
This study is qualitative as well as descriptive and analytical.
The primary data has been collected through analyzing the influence of economy on
environment and vice-versa. The secondary data has been collected through communication
with peers and scholars involved in the specified field.
METHOD OF ANALYSIS:
Different types of analysis are used for the study. The analyses are informal investigation,
Internal Analysis and External analysis.
8
2. NATIONAL AND INTERNATIONAL SCENARIO
Excessive groundwater extraction, pollution due to human wastes and industries and
Hydropower projects are among the factors that are causing this. Although Major
improvements have occurred in water access and sanitation in Asia over the last two
decades, it is still a long way from showing adequate number of facilities. Several supply
issues are set to be compounded by altered rainfall pattern which is a result of climate
change. It is estimated that within the next 30 years increasing glacial meltdown dry
season will transform Himalayan originating rivers such as Brahmaputra, Ganges and
Yangtze into seasonal rivers. According to United Nations projections to 2030 estimation
believes that the population of ASEAN, the PRC and India (46% of the global population)
will increase by 462 million (2010 UN). Thus, rises in agricultural, industrial and urban
usage will take an even greater toll on these dwindling supplies. The challenge could be
as great as water demand exceeding the supply by 25% in PRC and 50% in India (WRG
2009).
Even though accessibility to clean and ample supply of freshwater will be a common
challenge shared by most countries across Asia, the nature of this issue will vary across
different settings. While demand maybe a large role in some locations, supply-side
concerns such as polluted water or lower dry season rainfall maybe some of the issues
as well. In most locations a somewhat combination of these two such as efficiency of
water usage, degradation of water resources through overuse or pollution, allocation of
the resource according to agricultural, industrial and livelihood usage and even flood
control may turn out to be a disaster. The welfare implications of degraded water
resources in Asia are substantial. As 70% of water is currently used in agriculture (ADB
2007), water shortages undercut food security and the incomes of rural farmers.
9
There’s also the matter of hazards to health caused due to the intake of contaminated
water which ultimately reduces productivity and raises other health affiliated costs for
these people, already striving to make a living famers. Without improved management
of pollution, expansion of industrial water usage and other uses, particularly in the PRC,
the water may diminish to levels as low as unavailability for human consumption and
other uses. Conflicts may arise between states over the scarcity of water (Asia Society),
already plans for several PRC dams on the Tsangpo-Brahmaputra River upstream of the
Indian border are perceived as ‘a threat to the stability of bilateral relations between
the two countries'.
The causes for several of these deforestation and land degradation problems in Asia are
caused by: demand for timber products, palm oil, intensive farming and urban sprawl.
Some cases have showcased, poor regulations and corruptions to be the root cause of
allowing such unsustainable practices. With time it has become apparent throughout
the region that enduring economic costs from unsustainable land use ultimately
overwhelm the more immediate gains. Once the soil and land has been harmed enough,
it requires a large amount of time and expenses to recover. This eliminates the prospect
of gaining future sources of wood and causes other problems that curb the productivity
of the natural resource base. Over-cultivation of agricultural land is increasingly leading
to declining soil productivity and as a result, lowers output and food insecurity in some
regions. At the regional level l, the situation with regards to deforestation is clearly
improving. One of the main causes is due to the concerted afforestation and forest
protection efforts in the PRC, and also, to a lesser extent, in India and Vietnam.
10
The PRC has shown admirable ambition in this area and now has the largest area of
planted forest in the world. Even so in several other countries in Asia, such as Indonesia,
Malaysia, Myanmar, and Cambodia, deforestation continues on a massive scale.
The economic stature of some states like the PRC, Indonesia Malaysia and India depends
largely on commodities exported which are produced at the expense of land
degradation and deforestation. Indonesia and Malaysia by itself produce over 85% of
global palm oil exports. The PRC and India account for 45% of global imports (FAO
2011b). Limits to expansion of agricultural land in the latter are, to some degree,
“exporting” former deforestation problems. Similar trends in the Asian timber trade
have also emerged from recent analysis. Land degradation is a major environmental
issue like water shortage because like sufficient water, productive land is a necessary
determinant of food security. Food security in turn supports labour participation, well-
being and hence development and economic growth, but also other factors such as
political stability. The quality and quantity of arable land across Asia is continuing to
deteriorate, affecting large swathes of the population. According the Govt. of India it is
estimated that nearly half of the country’s land is degraded. Poor Management
practices in agricultural fields have caused huge problems such as soil erosion, rising
salinity, contamination by pesticides amongst various other issues. In the PRC, despite
extensive land restoration projects, the area of arable land continues to fall as erosion
and pollution spread. South East Asia witnesses draining of swampy peatland, usually
intended for agricultural purposes, has caused land to subside, become highly acidic,
and, hence, be unfit for any use (ASEAN 2011). According to the Food and Agriculture
Organization, an estimated two-thirds of ASEAN nations (excluding Singapore) have 40%
of their lands suffering severe degradation due to human activities. Intensive farming,
has contributed to high rates of decline in agricultural soil quality, particularly in Viet
Nam and Thailand.
11
environment. Consequently, air pollution is now a primary cause of illness and death in
both the growing cities and the poor rural areas of Asia. This problem has now grown to
such extents that its widespread nature is causing problems to productivity and income
of the labor force and thus exacting a heavy economic toll. A recent study has estimated
that in 2005 the annual welfare loss associated with air pollution in the PRC amounted
to US$ 151 billion (2010 dollars). Former 1997 dollars report shows this cost to be at an
estimation of 111.5 billion US dollars.
12
At a regional level, air pollution from cities has mixed with that from other sources
(including indoor air pollution) to form atmospheric brown clouds (ABCs) over Asia.
These combinations of aerosols and partially combusted (or black) carbon have been
shown to affect regional and global climate, crop production, as well as health. ABCs and
indoor air pollution both are a significant regional health risk even though the latter is a
symptom of under-development.
Particulate matter, CO, CO2 and other airborne substances damage the lungs of
householders, causing a variety of illnesses including cancer. Exposure to particulate
matter has been estimated to be 8 to over 100 times daily World Health Organization
(WHO) safe levels. According to WHO estimated 1million deaths occur in PRC, India and
ASEAN.
Asia is highly vulnerable to the effects of climate change. With a large population in low-
lying and coastal areas, widespread water insecurity, and around two thirds of the
world’s poorest people, the region is likely to suffer extensive damages in the future.
Even though the full force of development impacts might not be realized for many
decades, climate change adaptation is already a contemporary issue. Still various State
Leaders and sections of people continue to undermine the gravity of this issue while
some outright deny its existence.
Rising maximum temperatures and changing rainfall patterns are affecting agriculture
and food security today, and the effect of these changes will keep escalating until 2030.
It is estimated that yields of important crops will decline in parts of Asia by 2.5% to 10%
by the 2020s and a greater intensity of extreme weather events, incidence of flooding
and tropical disease, and decline of marine ecosystems are also concerns for the
proximate future.
The Climate change will only continue to worsen the ill effects of Asia’s current
environmental problems, such as water insecurity. But there’s something more to it.
Water shortage and Deforestation and black carbon emissions in Asia are important
drivers of global warming, both in terms of contribution and also because their
mitigation could be a low-cost option with short-term benefits. Continuing on its current
trajectory, energy demand in Asia is expected to explode with ongoing economic
expansion and, accordingly, so will coal use and greenhouse gas emissions. Asia is set
13
out to be the most dominant source of expansion in global emissions. In respect to
current projections, it is estimated that the PRC’s share of global fossil fuel emissions
will be 34% by 2030, and the figure for developing Asia as a whole will be 51.9%.
Whilst the scale of climate change damages to 2030 alone may not warrant the
substantial mitigation investment required in Asia over the next two decades, they will
be in the long run. At a regional level, Asia is both highly vulnerable to climate change
and will play a decisive role in its limitation. Therefore, extensive climate change
mitigation activities are a matter of self-interest. It is clear today that the process of
lifting the standard of living throughout Asia cannot follow the carbon-intensive
trajectory laid out by today’s high-income economies: the limits of the climate system
render such repetition infeasible. Switching to a “green growth” development pathway
will reduce the impact of potentially major stumbling blocks arising from climate
change, such as food and water insecurity, environmental refugees and conflict, among
others. Not only does avoidance of major climate damages provide a firmer base for
growth beyond 2030, but there are significant economic opportunities in the short-term
from leading the way in, for example, renewable energy generation, and also increasing
energy security. Indeed, the PRC and, to a lesser extent, India and ASEAN countries are
moving towards exploiting these opportunities.
14
individual conception of underlying drivers. Looking closely at the major environmental
challenges in Asia, it is evident that they evade precise definition as such. Certain issues
arise due to a complex network of already underlying problems.
Some of the common causes include: weak environmental regulation due to the
absence of laws or the institutional capacity to enforce them; economic growth in
sectors that use or pollute environmental resources; a burgeoning and more urbanized
population; and substantial underlying poverty. Even so there are specific factors
prominent for certain issues, such as poor infrastructure obstructing urban water
management or corruption encouraging deforestation. The lists of such underlying
causes are potentially endless. Overall assessment of a problem requires subjective
assessment of this myriad of causes and how they interact with each other at every
level. Defining a problem at a single location is difficult; from a regional perspective
harder still. The exact composition of the same broad problem is location specific; poor
transmission infrastructure may be a defining water management issue in Delhi, but it
may be negligible to a community living downstream from a manufacturing plant in the
PRC.
Formulating such problems is difficult due to their dynamic nature. That is, these
problems do not stand still. Some or many of the components of these scales of
problems change over time and eventually so does the nature of the problem itself. For
example, considering the groundwater depletion example, factors such as population
growth and climate change will likely increase pressure for over-exploitation over time.
Other factors may also change in conjunction with their market-based or political
determinants, such as standard of irrigation infrastructure, enforcement of regulations,
energy subsidies, and the cost of drilling deeper wells. More generally, variation in
incomes, energy use, population, and other underlying drivers of Asia’s broader
environmental challenges ensures that both the broader problems and their localized
manifestations will also be subject to continual change. Moreover, any attempted
solution will change the importance of such underlying factors and, hence, the problem
itself. There is no stopping rule when taking these issues into account. In the event of
more efficient management or development of alternative sources, there will always
remain incentives for over-exploitation. Successful policies may only improve the
situation temporarily, as, in many cases, prevailing conditions inexorably make these
problems worse, further complex, or more difficult to address.
15
Interdependency: The interdependent characteristics of such problems extend
beyond the causal linkages discussed in the context of problem formulation. As they
encompass numerous issues, these problems involve a multitude of different interest
groups. Let us take the example of dam construction on the Mekong River. The
expansion of regional energy supply could benefit urban and rural households, workers
in industry, company shareholders and, to some measure, the welfare of all that profit
from industrial expansion and regional economic growth without a doubt. The
recipients of dam-funded government projects in Laos and Cambodia could also hope
for prospective gains.
On the other hand, obstruction to the environmental services provided by the river
would harm fishermen, riparian farmers, and, to some measure, the welfare of the
regional population that is exposed to food insecurity. There’s a risk of tourist operators
also being negatively affected. Any solution will impact or involve all these groups, and,
for a single group, potentially in counteracting ways. For example, a fishing community
may receive better houses, healthcare, and electricity supply as part of a resettlement
package, but at a cost of the diminished viability of their major income activity.
Asia’s broader environmental challenges, are intrinsically linked to not only many
causes, but bear impacts across a range of social and economic activities. Many of these
are related to development and human welfare. Adequate water, clean air, arable land
and natural ecosystems (such as those associated with rivers and forests) have great
bearing on food security, human health and, more generally, poverty and incomes. But
often these outcomes affect the environmental issues themselves. Food insecurity may
prompt expansion of cropland into forested areas, thus increases agricultural water
demand. Low incomes increase incentives to adopt fire-clearing methods or use
biomass fuels, thus causing air pollution and respiratory illness. Poor health reduces
income potential, and so on and so forth. A complex web of interdependent factors
involving many groups is therefore involved. This combination of competing interests
and the multi-faceted linkages between them places a concerned policymaker in an
unenviable position. Environmental issue and policies to address it affect a wide variety
of stakeholders, and formulating a solution demands judgement upon an extensive
series of welfare trade-offs. Yet even these trade-offs are indeterminable and
subjectively assessed. Considering the dam example again, what is good for the
industrial worker in Viet Nam might be bad for his compatriot farming in the Mekong
Delta, but to which extent is unknown. Short-term reductions to fishing incomes in a
Lao village may eventually be offset in the long-term if dam revenues are
16
used to increase educational attainment. The development impacts of dam construction
would not only be widespread, they would also not be uniform across different groups
or across time. What’s more, the cyclical relationship between components of such a
problem means that any attempted solution is likely to have feedback effects. Hence the
policymaker is not even able to discern the true impact of a solution after
implementation because its effects cycle back and forth through the components of the
problem, altering the welfare and activities of stakeholders in a variable and obscure
process.
The presence of numerous and diverse stakeholders, in addition to the complex links
between their welfare and the problem, entails that solutions are neither right or
wrong, but rather better or worse. The merits of a particular solution depend on
personal judgements about the expected outcome, rather than on the basis of objective
evidence from, say, a scientific experiment, or an identical problem in the past. Indeed,
wicked problems are distinguished by a unique nature that defies simple application of a
conventional or recycled methodology. Furthermore, a clear and definable set of
solutions requires the complete, and unachievable, grasp of the dense web of
underlying processes. In any event, if this complete knowledge was achievable, the
preferred methods for navigating this web would be determined by formulation of the
problem. This presents a perverse situation. From earlier, one cannot define the
problem without some preconceived notion of the solution, yet a viable solution is
determined by how one views the problem.
17
2.6 Overfishing: Fish is a key source of food for virtually all Asian states, providing
one of the largest sources of animal protein to the world’s fastest growing commodity
market. The world’s largest Tuna fishery crosses the jurisdiction of at least 21 countries-
as well as extensive high seas areas of the Pacific Ocean- and involves harvesting by
fishing vessels from 26 different nations.
Across the Pacific Ocean and in many coastal and riparian parts of Asia, fishing is a
significant part of the economic base, providing food, employment, revenue and foreign
exchange earnings. World fisheries are being overfished as marine catches increased
from 17 million metric tons (MMT) in 1950 to a peak of 87.1 MMT in 1996. As a result
there has been a steady increase in the frequency of clashes and incidents at sea caused by
foreign fishing trawlers illegally encroaching into Exclusive Economic Zones and
territorial seas.
Aquaculture production is a growing part of the fisheries sector. In 1996 20% of all
global fisheries production was from aquaculture. Asia dominates world aquaculture for
fish, shrimp and shellfish, with China producing 68% of the global total. If done in an
environmentally friendly manner aquaculture can be a positive contributor to the world
food supply.
For example, giant tiger prawn production in Thailand has exploded from 900tonnes to
277000 tons in the last decade. However, reckless pumping of seawater into shrimp
ponds can damage neighbouring fields and hurt coastal marine life.
18
Ground Report of Specific Cases
tonnes of fish by 2030, equating to US$ 476 million per year. As fish
account for 47–80% of animal protein consumed within the LMB
(Hortle 2007), and are a major source of rural income (Dugan et al.
2010), this factor alone could have a major impact on food security
and poverty (MRC 2010). In addition, substantial blockage of
sediment transfer would cause significant downstream erosion and
undermine the productivity of riverside and flood plain agriculture.
Although prior assessment of the damages caused by LMB
mainstream dams are unavoidably estimates, disastrous experiences in
the PRC (Economy 2010) and on Mekong tributaries indicate their
potential scale.
3.2 Groundwater Depletion in India : The impending water crisis in
India is widely acknowledged as one of the major environmental and
economic issues facing the country. A principal component of this
problem is the unsustainable depletion of the nation’s groundwater
aquifers. Groundwater is a crucial resource in India, accounting for
over 65% of irrigation water and 85% of drinking water supplies.
However, on current trends it is estimated that 60% of groundwater
sources will be in a critical state within the next twenty years. In the
most seriously affected north-western states, the nation’s centre of
irrigated agriculture and site of economic hubs such as Delhi, recent
satellite measurements indicate an average decline of 33 cm per year
from 2002 to 2008. At a more localized level, observations of annual
water table decline exceeding 4 metres are common throughout India;
even exceeding 10 metres in some cases Groundwater depletion is
driven by a diverse range of demand-side factors.
20
Utilization of this resource facilitates irrigated agriculture in areas far
from rivers; groundwater was a key component of the “green
revolution” that occurred from the mid 1960s. In regions where
surface water is available but unsafe for drinking or farming—over
70% of India’s surface water resources are polluted by human waste
or toxic chemicals, rendering many of them unfit for consumption.
Groundwater has often been seen as a safe alternative. Water supply
infrastructure in urban areas is commonly poor and unreliable,
therefore rendering well drilling the most economical means of
obtaining household water; the local government estimates that 40%
of the water transmitted through Delhi’s mains system is lost through
leakages. In rural areas, the electricity subsidies allowing farmers to
pump groundwater cheaply have become entrenched in the political
landscape, and are likely to become more so as energy requirements
increase to extract water from greater depths. Low cost encourages
excess water withdrawal, an inefficient pattern of usage commonly
exacerbated by ineffective application to crops and the wastage of
agricultural produce between farm and market. In order to feed a
growing and wealthier population, it is projected that by 2030, and
under current usage patterns, agricultural water demand will double,
comprising of 80% demand. The state of groundwater quality in India
is a major health issue from both a contemporary and long-term
perspective. As wells are drilled deeper in pursuit of the falling water
table, the water which is extracted frequently displays higher levels of
arsenic, fluoride and other harmful chemicals. The attendant health
effects have been well documented throughout India, particularly in
poorer rural communities where there is no alternative for drinking
water. Geological contamination is often compounded by the broader
hydrological effects of a falling water table. Over-depletion of a
freshwater aquifer can induce leakage from a contaminated external
source such as saline water in coastal areas or surface water polluted
by sewage, agricultural fertilizers, or industry. It follows that
depletion of groundwater is not simply a case of drawing down a
21
replenishable resource, but one of lasting and proximate degradation.
The impact of climate change in India adds a further dimension to this
issue. Greater incidence of drought in some regions and an eventual
reduction in dry season river flow (once glacial melt decreases) will
position groundwater as a crucial buffer stock of water. A deficiency
in alternative water sources will increase the pressures for exploitation
in the future, thus rendering sustainable management under present
conditions even more important.
25
Pricing:
It should be taken into view that many environmental problems are directly or
indirectly affected by “market failure”. This failure usually pertains to
environmental costs being absent in the price of goods, services, and access to
certain resources. Raising the price to reflect these costs might lead to lesser
damage when it comes to environmental depletion. In the case studies, the link
was particularly clear in the case of excessive ground-water degradation in India.
In fact, when it comes to energy and water, the prices fail to reflect economic or
environmental costs. Of course, one of the reasons for Asia’s environmental
issues being problematic is because the pricing reforms they need to deal with
them are extremely hard to implement. Energy pricing reform can be one of the
most difficult changes which any government can attempt to undertake.
Nevertheless, if one is looking for solutions, opportunities to rectify the major
economical gap between private and social cost need to be strictly put into action.
The cons of this particular argument is that environmentally beneficial activities
should be actually supported through subsidies and other price-based
mechanisms. Governments all around the world are in fact already investing
heavily in renewable energy. The negative impacts of deforestation and the
importance of preservation of the ecosystem is given more importance now and
more economic mechanisms are employed to sustain them. This will only increase
with international and regional support in the provision of funds, technology, and
other valuable resources.
28
4.1.3 Cooperative management, regional institutions, and
international:
Cooperative management mechanisms need to be prevalent in order to avoid any
conflict over use of common or shared resources, particularly between states.
Forums such as the Mekong River Commission and many other similar
organisations like it in the region must serve as an important meeting place for
states to not only exchange critical information but also to negotiate. Agreements
regarding shared aspects and resources, if done beforehand, will help in the
materialization of potential flashpoints in the upcoming future, such as the
changing hydrology of rivers originating in Tibet and the Himalayas, will assist
adaptive and mutually beneficial management. At a lower community level,
cooperative management of say, groundwater, could help to break “public good”
characteristics wherein individual users have no self-interest in personally
pursuing sustainable usage patterns. Hence cooperative management in the pursuit
of such co-benefits will be critical to the results of a multi-objective reach.
An important component of cooperative management would be the main role for
regional institutions. Such institutions act as a conduit between scientific
researchers and policymakers, resource managers, as well as the public. In the
Asian Development Bank (ADB), the region already has a major institution that
caters to this particular role. As Asia’s environmental problems grow day by day,
the ADB can choose to expand its activities to further engage with alternative
management strategies. Political as well as economic institutions such as ASEAN
and APEC will increasingly have to include environmental issues within their
chosen agenda, and take action in order to convey the significance of these
problems to ensure regional growth and stability.
Here, international cooperation also has a demanding role to play. Asia needs
considerable assistance in order to find the resources and expertise required to
effectively eradicate its environmental problems. This is particularly true for the
poorer countries of Asia in per capita terms, such as India. The more
economically developed countries of the world also have a crucial leadership role
to play on such global issues. Although immediate action is being taken by OECD
countries to reduce green house emissions, amongst other preventive measures,
Asia can not handle it by herself, the situation demands for international
assistance and cooperation.
29
4.2 Conclusion:
It is clear that the current trajectory of environmental degradation in Asia is
unsustainable. Policy makers around the region acknowledge the importance of
environmentally sustainable development and growth and are already acting but
still a lot more needs to be done.
A prosperous, growing and safe Asia needs water, clean air, forests and arable
land. Under the prevalent trends, these components of the natural resource base
threaten to decline substantially as population and per capita income rises. Food
security, human health, and regional cooperation are all likely to weaken if natural
resources are not protected. Action on climate change mitigation in the region
over the next two decades will, by and large, shape the scale of damages from
global warming.
Both the region and the globe cannot afford for Asia as a whole to retain any
vestiges of a “development first-environment later” mindset. At the same time,
there are no easy answers. We have argued that Asia’s diverse environmental
problems share the characteristic of being “wicked”. That is, they are dynamic
and complex, they encompass many issues and stakeholders, and they evade
straightforward, lasting solutions. The six case-studies presented here serve both
to illustrate the breadth of problems Asia is facing on the environmental front, and
their wicked nature. These are not problems that will be solved by growth alone.
Growth will help make resources available to direct towards solutions, but they
will also deepen the impact of the divergence between social and private cost
which underlies so many of these problems. Prescriptive, simplistic solutions will
not be effective, and may make matters worse. The best one can hope to articulate
at a general level is a set of principles that may be useful in dealing with a number
of these problems.
The above list of strategies is certainly not exhaustive and the relative importance
of each will vary across different settings and problems; large investments in
scientific research will not substitute for an inherently corrupt bureaucracy. The
essential point is to avoid simplistic approaches. It is unquestionable that the
challenge is vast and the urgency mounting. Asia’s continued economic
expansion and rising standard of living are being increasingly exposed to
declining environmental conditions. The degree to which considered, pre-emptive
action takes primacy over forced reaction will determine the burden of
environmental degradation on Asian economic development to 2030.
30
5. References:
www.google.com
www.oppapers.com
www.wikipedia.com
http://www.lead-journal.org/content/08075.pdf
http://www.asean.org/21060.htm.
http://www.adb.org/Documents/Reports/Energy-Efficiency-Transport/energy-
efficiency.pdf.
Adler, T. 2010. Better Burning, Better Breathing: Improving Health with Cleaner
Cook Stoves.
Environmental Health Perspectives.
Several other publications were used for information.
31
ANNEXURE-I
Place: Kolkata
Date: 25/06/2020
Signature:
32
ANNEXURE-II
I hereby declare that the project work with the title, “Economic Growth in Asia”
submitted by me for the partial fulfilment of the degree of B.Com Honours in
Accounting and Finance under the University of Calcutta is my original work and
has not been submitted earlier to any University/ Institution for the fulfilment of
the requirement for any course of study.
I also declare that no chapter of this manuscript in whole or in part has been
incorporated in this report from any earlier work done by others or by me.
However extracts for any literature which has been used in this report has been
duly acknowledged, providing details of the literature in the references.
Place: Kolkata
Date: 25/06/2020
Signature:
Name: Vaibhav Gupta
Address: 244 A.P.C. Road, Kolkata: 700006
Registration number: 017-1111-2905-17
33