Scribd
Upload
189 views1 page

People V de Guia

Manuel de Guia was convicted of illegal recruitment and estafa for recruiting workers and promising employment abroad without proper licensing. On appeal, he argued his arrest was unlawful as it was done in public without a warrant. The Supreme Court ruled that the legality of the arrest could no longer be raised after conviction by the trial court. It noted he did not raise the issue during arraignment and pleaded not guilty, thereby waiving any objection. The Court cited precedent that an illegal arrest alone does not invalidate subsequent legal proceedings if guilt is established.

Uploaded by

Loreen Danao
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
189 views1 page

People V de Guia

Manuel de Guia was convicted of illegal recruitment and estafa for recruiting workers and promising employment abroad without proper licensing. On appeal, he argued his arrest was unlawful as it was done in public without a warrant. The Supreme Court ruled that the legality of the arrest could no longer be raised after conviction by the trial court. It noted he did not raise the issue during arraignment and pleaded not guilty, thereby waiving any objection. The Court cited precedent that an illegal arrest alone does not invalidate subsequent legal proceedings if guilt is established.

Uploaded by

Loreen Danao
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

CRIMPRO | DIGESTS | 2F

Case No. 2 : People v De Guia


G.R. Nos. 107200-03 November 9, 1993
TOPIC : Arrest, when unlwful
LODA

FACTS:
Accused-appellant Manuel de Guia y Samonte, conspiring and confederating with one
whose true name, identity and present whereabouts are still (unknown) and mutually
helping each other, representing himself to have the capacity to contract, enlist and
transport Filipino workers for employment abroad, recruited and promised
employment/job placement abroad to Cirilo Lising y Mercado, Monteza (sic) Gazmin y
Pascual, Leopoldo Realino y Arceo and Jesus Sumalinog y Carin among others without
first having secured the required license or authority from the Department of Labor and
Employment for a fee. Thus, de Guia was convicted by the Regional Trial Court of
Manila, Branch XLI, of the crime of Illegal Recruitment in large scale and three (3)
counts of Estafa, in violation of Article 38 of the Labor Code, as amended and Article
315 (2) (a) of the Revised Penal Code, respectively.

On appeal to the SC, accused averred that the lower court erred in upholding the
unlawful arrest of the accused in a public place without any warrant or process issued
by a competent court.

ISSUE:
Whether or not legality of an accused’s arrest can still be raised after conviction
by the trial court

SC RULING:
NO. Appellant's alleged warrantless arrest will not exculpate him from his guilt as found
by the trial court. To be sure, the plea comes too late in the day. We note that upon
arraignment, appellant pleaded not guilty to the Information and did not raise the
alleged illegality of his arrest. By so pleading, he waived the alleged illegality of
his arrest. The SC cited People v. Briones in saying that the illegality of appellant's
warrantless arrest cannot render all the other proceedings, including the
appellant's conviction, void. It cannot deprive the State of its right to convict the guilty
when all the facts on record point to his culpability.

ADDITIONAL NOTES (DOCTRINES)


●

You might also like