0% found this document useful (0 votes)
161 views5 pages

Lagrange Equation in Classical Mechanics

This document presents the derivation of the Lagrange equation from D'Alembert's principle of virtual work. It shows that: 1) D'Alembert's principle can be used to express the equilibrium of both static and dynamic cases in terms of generalized coordinates. 2) Expressing the position, velocity, and virtual displacement of particles in terms of generalized coordinates allows derivation of generalized forces and momenta. 3) Gathering all terms results in the Lagrange equation, which relates generalized forces and momenta to the derivatives of the kinetic and potential energies with respect to generalized coordinates and velocities.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
161 views5 pages

Lagrange Equation in Classical Mechanics

This document presents the derivation of the Lagrange equation from D'Alembert's principle of virtual work. It shows that: 1) D'Alembert's principle can be used to express the equilibrium of both static and dynamic cases in terms of generalized coordinates. 2) Expressing the position, velocity, and virtual displacement of particles in terms of generalized coordinates allows derivation of generalized forces and momenta. 3) Gathering all terms results in the Lagrange equation, which relates generalized forces and momenta to the derivatives of the kinetic and potential energies with respect to generalized coordinates and velocities.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 5

Jaezyl Comon Elumba

Classical Mechanics

September 20, 2020

1 Lagrange Equation
From the D’ Alembert’s Principle,
X ~(a)
= (Fi − P~i )· δ~ri = 0
i

This equation expresses the equilibrium of both the static and dynamic case.

Now, the position of the ith particle expressed in terms of the generalized
coordinates is

r~i = r~i (q1 , q2 , ..., qn ; t)


Thus, the velocity vi can be expressed in terms of q˙k by the formula

d~
ri X ∂~
ri ∂~
ri
~v = = q˙k +
dt ∂qk ∂t
We may define the virtual displacement δ~
ri as
X ∂~
ri
δ~
ri = δqi
j
∂t

Note that δt is not involve here, because in virtual displacement we held the
time as fixed.

1
In terms of the generalized coordinates, the virtual work of the Fi becomes
X X ∂~
ri
F~i · δ~
ri = F~i · δqj
i i,j
∂qj

We can express the jth components generalized force Qi as


X ∂~
ri
Qj = F~i ·
i,j
∂qj

We turn now to the momentum componet which can be written as


X X
p~˙i · δ~
ri = mi r~¨i · δ~
ri
i
X ∂~
ri
= mi r~¨i
i,j
∂qj

Evaluating the expression


d ˙ ∂~ ri ∂~
ri d ∂~ri
i i·
(m~r ) = mi r~¨i · + mi r~˙i · ( )
dt ∂qj ∂qj dt ∂qj

What we need is
∂~
ri
mi r~¨i
∂qj
Expanding the momentum component in terms of i for a given j, we have
X ∂~
r i
X d ∂~
r i d ∂~
ri

mi r~¨i · = (mi r~˙i · ) − mi r~˙i · ( )
i
∂q j i
dt ∂q i dt ∂qi

If we look at the last term


d ∂~ri ∂ d~ri ∂ v~i
( )= =
dt ∂qj ∂qj dt ∂qj

Note that
X ∂~
ri ∂~
ri
v~i = q˙k +
k
∂qk qt

2
Substituting the value of v~i we now have
( )
d ∂~ ri ∂ X ∂~ ri ∂~ri
( )= · q˙k +
dt ∂qj ∂qj k
∂q k ∂t
X ∂ 2 r~i ∂ 2 r~i
= q˙k +
k
∂qj ∂qk ∂t

If we go back to the main problem


X ∂~
ri
X d ∂ v
~ i ∂ v
~i

mi r~¨i · = [mi v~i · ] − mi v~i ·
i
∂qj i
dt ∂ q˙j ∂qj

If you recall, there is an expression


∂ 1 ∂vi
( mi vi 2 ) = mi vi ·
∂ q˙j 2 ∂ q˙j
∂ v~i
= mi v~i ·
∂ q˙j
We also have  
∂ 1 2 ∂ v~i
mi vi = mi v~i ·
∂qi 2 ∂qi
Gather the last 2 equations we have
     
X
¨ ∂~
ri X d ∂ ∂
mi r~i · = Ti − Ti
i
∂q j i
dt ∂ q˙i ∂q i
PP P
Since there is a in the momentum, we still have a j written as
! (     )
X X ∂~ri
X X d ∂~r i d ∂~
r i
mi r~¨i · δqj = mi r~˙i · − mi r~˙i · δqj
j i
∂q j j i
dt ∂q j dt ∂q j

We can rewrite this further as


( )
X X d  ∂ v~i

∂ v~i
= mi v~i · − mi v~i · δqj
j i
dt ∂ q˙j ∂q j

Taking out the j factor, we have


( )
X d ∂ X 1 
∂ X1
= mi vi 2 − mi vi 2 δqj
j
dt ∂ q˙j i
2 ∂q j i
2

3
Rewriting the momentum term,
X ∂~
ri X  d ∂T ∂T

¨
mi r~i · δqj = − δqj
i,j
∂q j j
dt ∂ q˙j ∂q j

Putting everything together in D’ Alembert’s Principle, we have


X
F~i − p~˙i · δ~

ri = 0
i
!
X ∂~
ri ∂~
ri
F~i · − mi r~¨i · δqj = 0
i,j
∂qj ∂qj
We define the first term for the generalized force, we have now
( " #)
X d ∂T ∂T
Qj − − δqj = 0
j
dt ∂ q˙j ∂q j

If you have holonomic constraints, there are actually k constraints.

Suppose you have k constraints from 3N coordinates, we now have 3N −k


independent j - equations.
What we get now is  
d ∂T ∂T
− − Qj = 0
dt ∂ q˙j ∂qj
This equation is the general result.
However, the special case is when the forces F are derivable from a scalar
potential V
F~i = −∇
~ iV
Rewrite the Qj
X ∂~ri
Qj = F~i ·
i
∂qj

~ i V · ∂~
ri
X
=− ∇
i
∂qj

If we take the dot product of the last term along the direction of i, the result
would be
∂V
=−
∂qj

4
Everything can be written now as
 
d ∂T ∂T ∂V
− + =0
dt ∂ q˙j ∂qj ∂qj

Remember that V does not depend on q˙j


  
d ∂
T −V − ∂(T − V ) over∂qj = 0
dt ∂ q˙j

Define L = T − V , we get the Lagrange Equation


 
d ∂L ∂L
− =0
dt ∂ q˙j ∂qj

You might also like