English Language: Action Research Report: Mona Mustapha - Oct 2010
English Language: Action Research Report: Mona Mustapha - Oct 2010
ABSTRACT
This action research has been carried out for the purpose of assisting the pupils of Year 4 Alfa as
they were having difficulty in understanding how to use the correct form of the SIMPLE
PRESENT TENSE. My target group is all 41 pupils in this class. I chose them as I found out their
weakness in this area during a simple exercise in the class. To my surprise, I discovered that most
of them actually had no idea when and when not to plus an ‘s’ or ‘es’ to the verb. They were
unable to tackle questions on this grammar item when they answered some objective questions in
the workbook during the daily lessons as well as in tests and examination. Every time they did the
filling in the blanks exercises, they simply guessed the answers without knowing exactly how to
tackle it. From my observation, most of the pupils in Year 4 Alfa understand what a verb is and I
would regard that their collection of basic vocabulary in verbs is quite rich. In fact, most of them
are also able to differentiate subject and verb quite well. This is the prior knowledge and advantage
that the pupils have acquired. With this prior knowledge, it convinces and enables me to run the
research activities among the pupils. I strongly believe that these activities which I called 2PIC
(further elaborated under Execution of Research section) would benefit and assist them to tackle
this problem later. It involves lots of drilling process and step by step formulas for each activity
along the way, so that it would build the pupils’ confidence when answering such questions.
1. BACKGROUND OF RESEARCH
1.1 Early Observation
Being teaching the English Language subject for almost 7 years, I have discovered
that the SIMPLE PRESENT TENSE has always been a difficult grammar item for the
Level 2 pupils. Most of them failed to correctly answer this type of grammar questions in
classroom exercises, tests and examinations. They simply put ‘s’ or ‘es’ after the verb
reflecting that they were unable to tackle these questions well. Furthermore, I have noticed
that the SIMPLE PRESENT TENSE has been the favourite grammar item under Section C
(Question 16 – 20 : Grammar Item) in Ujian Penilaian Sekolah Rendah (UPSR) Paper 1. In
fact, I would say that it has been a compulsory question every year which made me more
determined to run this research. Who knows if it could contribute 1 mark for all 41 of them
in the UPSR 2012.
Taking all these into consideration, I decided to run two survey sessions among the
pupils; Survey 1 and Survey 2. In order to support my survey, I have also decided to run a
pre-test consisting of 30 questions on this item. All 41 pupils were compulsory to answer
this test with the prior knowledge which they have acquired before in the previous lesson or
in their former years both in school and tuition centres.
2. RESEARCH FOCUS
While teaching the SIMPLE PRESENT TENSE in the class, I discovered that most
of the pupils answered the exercise wrongly. Since this was my first time teaching this
class, I decided to run a few instruments before proceeding with the suggested activities
such as in the Proposal Paper in order to evaluate the level of pupils’ understanding on this
Mona Mustapha | Oct 2010
2
English Language: Action Research Report
item. They were supposed to be able to identify the subject as well as the verb in each
sentence. For subject, I did not include “uncountable nouns” in this research where I only
focused on “countable nouns”, so that pupils can differentiate singular and plural subject
and thus, avoid confusion among them. Being able to differentiate this subject would help
them to tackle the questions more easily and commit lesser mistakes for this grammar item.
3. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
Throughout this research, I have studied the pupils’ attitude and behaviour along the
way i.e. during the lessons in the classroom. I observed a few areas on their interest and
attention as well as how they respond towards my lesson. I even made sure there is a close
3
English Language: Action Research Report
monitoring on their work in the exercise book. Besides, I also used other methodologies
such as survey, pre-test, research activities and post test.
3.1 Survey
There were two surveys carried out among the pupils before proceeding with other
research activities and tests. The pupils had answered Survey Form 1 and Survey
Form 2. Survey 1 focuses on the pupils’ personal background and interest in
learning while Survey 2 focuses on pupils’ basic understanding on this particular
grammar item; SIMPLE PRESENT TENSE. They answered the surveys and filled
in the forms during the English Language period where I myself read the questions
for them for the purpose of reliance and validation.
3.2 Pre-test
The pupils had to sit for the Pre-test consisting of 30 questions on this item. This is
for the purpose of assessing pupils’ understanding in using the SIMPLE PRESENT
TENSE with the prior knowledge they have acquired before.
4
English Language: Action Research Report
4. EXECUTION OF RESEARCH
The whole process of carrying out this research took 14 solid weeks involving few
stages such as problem study, planning, execution of activities, test and data analysis as
well as reflection on the research.
NO PROBLEMS PERCENTAGE
5
English Language: Action Research Report
meant to boost the pupils’ interest and self-confidence especially the weaker or
passive pupils. I even rewarded them with sweets and ‘smiley’ stickers for every
correct answer. This action challenged and encouraged them to participate more
actively as they would want to have more and more sweets as well as stickers in
their collection.
The next step to overcome Problem No. 6 was providing the pupils exercises
as according to the four research activities which I have planned in the proposal
paper. Interesting activities and exercises would be carried out along the research to
develop the pupils’ understanding and able to tackle questions on SIMPLE
PRESENT TENSE easily in the future.
should be improving in the Post Test after all activities had been carried out
during the lesson.
6
4.3.2 Execution of Research Activities
I have planned four interesting activities in order to improve the pupils’
understanding on grammar item; SIMPLE PRESENT TENSE. I called these
activities the 2PIC (PPIC), which are The 6-piece Puzzle, Let’s Part and
Fix Them, I Say… You Say... and My Collection of Authentic Material. The
activities had been carried out during the English Language period. All
activities were designed to attract pupils’ interest and attention in
participating actively. They were pupil-oriented activities and used lots of
teaching materials such as coloured pencils, manila cards and some paper
cutting. More physical movement was involved along these activities;
arranging giant-sized cards and verbal game for instance. Each activity was
drilled daily for a few days and weeks.
Subject Verb
Singula Verb +
r ‘s’
Plural
Verb
The pupils had memorised the table, i.e. the arrangement of squares. They
were divided into 7 groups of 5 to 6 members (See Attachment). I have
prepared the table on manila cards and cut into 6 pieces of squares. There
were 7 sets of puzzles, meant for 7 groups. This activity was carried out
during the first 5 minutes of every English Language period for the day.
Each pupil in each group held one piece upside down. On my count to 3,
7
they turned the card up and simultaneously arranged the squares to solve the
6-piece puzzle in ten seconds. I made one round to check the arrangement
for each group. This activity was carried out for two weeks from Tuesday to
Friday. Every group had successfully solved the puzzle within the said time
frame by the second week.
P
S V
art
They walks to school every morning.
them
Fi
x
S V
Them
They walk to school every morning.
them
8
Every pupil would do this activity from Tuesday to Friday, which took 7
minutes before the lesson began. After three weeks of this activity, the
pupils had compiled 36 sentence strips.
9
5. OUTCOME OF RESEARCH
The Post-test was carried out after all the stated activities above had been executed.
The pupils had answered a set of 30 questions in 45 minutes time during an English
Language period. The questions were exactly the same questions as the Pre-test which
required them to fill in the blanks correctly. This test reflected how well they understand
the stated grammar item. The following is the result of both Pre-test and Post Test:
26 – 30 2 5% 11 27%
21 – 25 7 17% 23 56%
16 – 20 20 49% 7 17%
11 – 15 12 29% 0 0%
6 – 10 0 0% 0 0%
0-5 0 0% 0 0%
6. REFLECTION
6.1 Evaluation on Pupils’ Achievement
The data above shows tremendous increase in the percentage of Post Test. The
average score has moved to one level higher; i.e. 21 – 25 marks at 56%. The Pre-
test average score was 16 – 20 marks. All four activities which I had designed ran
as planned. I believe that the drilling process during each lesson had successfully
helped the children to understand better. The weaker pupils now are able to tackle
the question well. They follow the formulae step by step as I have drilled during
each four activities throughout the research. It indicates that my treatment through
the activities worked out well on them. They made it through answering the same
set of 30 questions in the Post Test by applying these steps. All pupils had improved
their individual score (See Attachment) compared to the Pre-test result.
10
6.2 Conclusion
From my observation, I could see that the Year 4 Alfa pupils now have an idea on
how to tackle questions on SIMPLE PRESENT TENSE. They are able to apply the
steps which I have taught them every time they answer such question during the
lesson. I have also observed that there is less confusion among the pupils on when
to put an ‘s’ or ‘es’. They manage to identify most of the keywords the way I drilled
them in each research activities. What makes it more than satisfactory is that the
pupils are able to write better usage of this particular grammar item in Section A
Paper 2 question during exercises in the classroom. The samples of sentences that
they write on the blackboard indicate their great improvement and the research had
benefited them a lot.
8. CLOSING
The pupils are our future. I sometimes sigh with their minimal achievement in the
test and examination result after all of my effort and hard work teaching them in the class.
Still, it is my responsibility that as a teacher, I cannot afford giving up in imparting
knowledge no matter how challenging and difficult it can be. Day in, day out, time
constraint and increasing workload are unavoidable factors. Thus, I believe with the spirit
and effort that I have, I should provide the pupils quality education for their better future.
11
BIBLIOGRAPHY
2. Lim Peck Choo, Gurnam Kaur Sidhu and Azman Azlina Azmar. English Year 4 Textbook.
Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa Dan Pustaka, 2006.
3. Whitehead, Jack. Action Research fot Teachers: A Practical Guide with Jack Whitehead.
London: David Fulton Publisher, 2005.
4. Nor Bi Abd. Rahman. Easy English: A Different Approach To Learn English Thirteenth
Edition. Shah Alam: Alaf 21 Sendirian Berhad, 2007.
5. Mac Yin Mee. Total Revision Year 4.5.6 New UPSR Englsih. Petaling Jaya: Sasbadi Sdn.
Bhd., 2006.
7. Oxford Dictionary
8. www.actionresearch.net/writings/livtheory.html
9. http://kajiantindakansitirafeqah.blogspot.com/2009_04_01_archive.html
12