Developing Country Studies www.iiste.

org
ISSN 2224-607X (Paper) ISSN 2225-0565 (Online)
Vol.4, No.22, 2014

Evaluation of Banking Sector’s Development in Bangladesh in

light of Financial Reform
1* 2
Nusrat Jahan K.M. Golam Muhiuddin
1.Assistant Professor, School of Business, Chittagong Independent University, Bangladesh
2.Professor, Ex-Dean, AIS Department, Faculty of Business Administration, Chittagong University
* E-mail of the corresponding author: mrs_jahan@ciu.edu.bd

Abstract
Historically, the performance of the banking sector has been weak, characterized by weak asset quality,
inadequate provisioning, and negative capitalization of state-owned banks. To overcome these problems, the
initial phase of banking reform (1980-1990) focused on the promotion of private ownership and
denationalization of nationalized commercial banks (SCBs). During the second phase of reform, Financial
Sector Reform Project (FSRP) of World Bank was launched in 1990 with the focus on gradual deregulations of
the interest rate structure, providing market-oriented incentives for priority sector lending and improvement in
the
debt recovery environment. Moreover, a large number of private commercial banks were granted licenses during
the second phase of reforms. Bangladesh Bank adopted Basel-I norms in 1996 and Basel-II during
2010. Moreover, the Central Bank Strengthening Project initiated in 2003 focused on effective regulatory and
supervisory system, particularly strengthening the legal framework of banking sector. This study evaluates how
successfully the banking sector of Bangladesh has evolved over the past decades in light of financial reform
measures undertaken to strengthen this sector.
Keywords: Financial Reform, PCB, SCB, FCB, DFI, Bangladesh

1. Introduction
The financial sector in Bangladesh comprises the money and capital markets, insurance and pensions, and
microfinance. In addition to the Bangladesh Bank the central bank of Bangladesh-there are four state-owned
commercial banks (SCBs), four state-owned specialized banks (DFIs) dedicated to agricultural and industrial
lending, thirty domestic private commercial banks (PCBs), nine foreign commercial banks (FCBs), and thirty
one non-bank financial institutions (NBFIs). Bangladesh Bank has regulatory and supervisory jurisdiction over
the entire banking sub-sector as well as the NBFIs. Most of the institutions in the financial sector are
characterized by a mix of public and private ownership. During the first decade of independence, financial
system of Bangladesh has been suffering from deep crises. Historically, the performance of the banking sector of
Bangladesh has been weak due to weak asset quality, inadequate provisioning, negative capitalization in
systemically important state banks and constrained profitability. State banks were at times used to lend to
politically important economic sectors and institutions as well as politically linked persons. Similarly, the private
banks lacked sufficient checks and balances in the form of effective standards of corporate governance,
resulting in high levels of related party lending. However, these trends have started to reverse in more recent
times, with significant efforts made to restructure ailing state banks, improve standards of risk management,
corporate governance and bank supervision and cope with international best practice standards. Following the
global financial crisis of 2008 the role of financial sector regulators came under sharp scrutiny worldwide,
however the banking sector of Bangladesh remain largely unaffected by the crisis. With the revamp of financial
sector regulatory and supervisory frameworks with sharper focus on risk and systemic stability in line with post-
global crisis and revisions of international best practice standards, the importance of conducting study on the
performance evaluation of banking sector is interminable. Therefore, the aim of this study is to evaluate how
successfully banking industry of Bangladesh has evolved over the past decades with regards to financial reform
measures undertaken to strengthen this sector.

2. Financial Sector Reform Initiatives of Banking Sector

There were six nationalized commercial banks (NCBs) in Bangladesh until 1982 which are Sonali, Agrani,
Janata, Rupali, Pubali and Uttara Bank. Banking system reforms in Bangladesh were required due to the serious
weaknesses that threatened to destabilize the banking system, including weak asset quality and capitalization.
The more severe weaknesses were at the state-owned commercial banks that were affected by poor credit
underwriting standards, politically linked lending, weak management and to some extent, regulatory inaction.
The initial phase of financial sector reform initiated in 1982, when the government denationalized two of the six
NCBs (Rupali Bank and Pubali Bank) and permitted entry of local private banks. Rupali bank was
denationalized in 1986 and transformed into PLC, with the government holding 51% shares. As of December
2007, government share in the paid up capital of Rupali bank was at 93.2%. In order to identify major problems
in the financial system and to suggest remedial measures, Bangladesh government formed the ‘National
13
Commission on Money, Banking and Credit’ (NCMBC) in 1984. Many private commercial banks which were
granted license in the early 1980s were Islami Bank Bangladesh (1983), United Commercial Bank (1983), City
Bank (1983), National Bank (1983), Arab Bangladesh Bank (1985) and Al-Baraka Bank (1987). Despite the
measures taken, initial round of reform was largely unsuccessful due to influence of vested Private Commercial
Banks (PCBs) and State-owned Commercial Banks (SCBs) interest groups which resulted in loan default
culture. Subsequently, a World Bank Mission conducted a comprehensive study of the financial sector and
suggested reforms relating to fixation of interest rates on deposits and advances, classification of overdue loans,
restructuring of capital of NCBs and PCBs and market orientation of banking transactions (Chowdhury, 2000,
Robin, 2008 and Moral, n.d.).
Bangladesh Bank combined the observations and suggestions from both the NCMBC and World Bank,
and undertook some initiatives aligned with these suggestions. In 1990, Financial Sector Adjustment Credit
(FSAC) and Financial Sector Reform Program (FSRP) of World Bank was instituted with board objective of
enhancing competitiveness in the banking industry, whereas the specific objective was to make SCBs
commercially viable for subsequent privatization and help PCBs to increase their market share in total
commercial banking. The policies of FSRP directed banks to provide loans on commercial basis,
limited government control to the monetary policy only. It forced banks to have a minimum capital adequacy
following Basel-I norms, systematically classify loans and to implement modern accounting systems and
computerized systems. It forced the central bank to free up interest rates, revise financial laws and to increase
supervision in the credit market. However, FSRP expired in 1996 and just before expiry government formed
Banking Reform Committee (BRC) which recommended relevant acts and laws should be reviewed and
amended to ensure legal enforcement which is must for attaining financial stability (Robin, 2008, Islam and
Hamid, 2012).
The Banking Companies Act, 1991 was enacted in February 1991 and amended in 1993 and 1995, in
order to make the role of Bangladesh Bank as authoritarian in dealing with licensing, monitoring, regulating and
supervising the banking sectors. The Act deals mainly with the operations and permitted activities of the
banking companies. Bangladesh Bank exercises the Act in order to reestablish the discipline in the sanctioning
and rescheduling of loans and advances. Minimum capital adequacy guidelines based on Capital-to
Liabilities approach was incorporated in the Banking Companies Act, 1991 and in the Banking Companies
(amendment)
Act, 1995. Following the recommendation of the Bank for International Settlement (BIS), Bangladesh Bank
instructed all scheduled banks to submit their capital ratios and adopted Basel-I norms in 1990. In order to
recover the defaulted loans, Artha Rin Adalat Act, 1990 was enacted in 1990 and a series of amendments were
made to the Act in 1990, 1992, 1994 and 1997 to incorporate the effective rules to accommodate the changed
situation. Prior to setting up of Artha Rin Adalat, there was no special law for recovery of loans. Even after so
many amendments, the Act still suffers from some drawbacks. The Bankruptcy Act, 1997 has been enacted in
March 1997. The Act has been enacted with a view to judge a debtor as bankrupt, make smooth realization of a
bankrupt's assets, discharge the debtor after distribution of his assets, and take effective measures
against defaulting borrowers (Chowdhury, 2000).
As per recommendation of FSRP, Bangladesh bank introduced a flexible market-oriented interest rate
policy in 1990 abolishing the earlier system of centrally administered interest rate structure and sector specific
concession refinancing facilities. Under the new policy, interest-rate bands were prescribed for different
categories of loans, advances and deposits within which banks are free to fix their own rate. Interest rate spreads
were closely monitored by Bangladesh banks and banks are advised to keep the spread below five percent due to
concern over hampered credit allocation to priority sectors of the economy. Bangladesh Bank has established
Credit Information Bureau (CIB) in August 1992 in order to provide reliable information regarding the credit
worthiness of borrowers. The aim of CIB report is to avoid duplication of credit facilities, avoid credit facilities
to defaulters and justify the status of the borrowers. In order to ensure early recognition of Non-Performing
Loans, Bangladesh Bank has adopted the Loan Classification and Provisioning policy formulated by the
Banking Control Division (BCD) in 1989 in order to attain international standard. All the commercial banks
have to set up required provisions for their loans. According to this policy, a certain portion of the loans and
advances sanctioned by all the banks have to be kept under the newly set up provisions. ‘Offshore Banking
Unit’ (OBU) of the banks also has also to follow this new policy which made the OBU transactions more
transparent. In order to manage the credit risk effectively, Bangladesh Bank has introduced the Credit Risk
Grading System (CRGS) where banks have to grade their loans into eight categories. These grades are Superior,
Good, Acceptable, Marginal or Watch list, Special Mention Account, Substandard, Doubtful and Loss according
to the duration of the overdue status (Kabir, 2004). A supervisory unit both off-site and on-site was established
in the Bangladesh Bank to evaluate the performance of banks, grading them using ‘CAMEL’ rating system, a
device judging five major indicators of banks on a scale of 1 to 5 which are capital adequacy, asset quality,
management, earning and liquidity. (Robin, 2008)
During May 1997, government undertook another project, namely "Commercial Bank Restructuring
Project (CBRP)" also funded by the World Bank. This project was undertaken to identify urgent course of
actions needed for continuing the pace and progress so far done. Second phase of reform though resulted in
greater private participation and development of wide range of financial products and services but the banking
sector did not generate expected result until the late 1990s. However, earlier reform measures undertaken failed
to overcome some key problems such as high nonperforming loan in both SCBs and PCBs and enforcement of
capital adequacy and other regulatory requirements. Therefore, in early 2000s, reform measures are shifted to
risk-based regulations and supervision of banking sector. World Bank submitted some recommendations which
are “effective legal system, good management, and effective central bank" as three pillars of banking and
proposed to rebuild these pillars first. The World Bank urged to go for privatization only after the successful
completion of financial restructuring of the SCBs. The Word Bank identified less attractive pay structure of SCB
officials, excessive influence of trade unions, absence of autonomy and accountability, poor internal governance
and management, over-staffing and over-branching, and weak legal infrastructure. Based on these observations,
World Bank suggested some programs mainly focusing on to improve institutional capacity, restructure SCBs,
ensuring transparency, formulating legal procedure related to realize the outstanding loans, compliance with
international best practices etc. Based on the recommendation of the World Bank, Bangladesh Bank undertook
some reform initiatives (Rahman, 2012).
Though FSRP spelled out the issues regarding regulation and supervision but it was indeed the reform
measures in post 2000s that had a main focus on risk-based banking regulations and supervision. The Central
Bank Strengthening Project initiated in 2003 focused on effective regulatory and supervisory system for the
banking sector, particularly strengthening the legal framework, automation and human resource development
and capacity building. Money Laundering Prevention Act 2002 was enacted in April 2002 and amended in 2007.
Money Loan Court 2003 has been enacted to provide speedy procedures for obtaining decrees and execution
regarding settlement of loan recovery disputes. (Robin, 2008) The Enterprise Growth and Bank Modernization
Project was adopted in 2004 by the World Bank to help the government achieve a competitive private banking
system through a staged withdrawal through divestment and corporatisation of a substantial shareholding in the
three public sector banks which are Rupali, Agrani and Janata bank and the largest state bank, Sonali. Given the
government’s fiscal constraints, which limit its ability to recapitalize the SCBs, what was achieved was the
conversion of Sonali, Janata and Agrani Bank into PLC’s by mid 2007 in order to make them more autonomous
and to pursue eventual privatization (Islam and Hamid, 2012). During the conversion of three SCBs into PLC,
the valuation adjustment of assets and liabilities resulted in the accumulated losses. Since the conversion of these
SCBs into PLCs, notable improvements are yet to be seen. The reported gross NPL to total loan ratios for the
four SCBs and DFIs were still high at 11.3% and 24.6% during 2011, indicating that significant progress still
needs to be made (Anandakumar, Khan and Srivastava, 2009). However, the banking sector reform post 2000s
resulted in expansion of private and foreign commercial banking activities and therefore the domination of the
banking system by the SCBs is declining while PCBs and FCBs have been gaining market share in recent years,
reflecting increased competition in the banking industry. Since 2002, the PCBs and FCBs have consistently
outperformed state-owned specialized banks (DFIs) and SCBs in terms of growth in deposits and advances. To
cope with the international best practices and to make the bank’s capital more risk sensitive as well as more
shock resilient, Bangladesh Bank adopted Basel II Framework in 2006 in accordance with ‘International
Convergence of Capital Measurement and Capital Standards’ released by Basel Committee on Banking
Supervision (BCBS). Basel II guidelines were made as statutory compliance for all scheduled banks in
Bangladesh from January, 2010. Meanwhile, Basel-III has been published by Basel Committee for Banking
Super-vision (BCBS) and Bangladesh Bank is planning to adopt the same in near future (Recent
Reform Initiatives, 2012).

3. Objective of the Study

The broad objective of this study is to evaluate the development of banking sector of Bangladesh in light of
financial reform measures undertaken during the period of 1997 to 2011. The specific objectives
are: I) Evaluating the growth of accessibility to banking services.
II) Examining the banking sectors contribution in financial deepening.
III) Examining the operational efficiency of the banking sector.
IV) Investigating the stability of the banking sector.

4. Research Methodology
The financial sector of a country comprises a variety of financial institutions, markets, and products. The World
Bank’s Global Financial Development Database developed a comprehensive yet relatively simple conceptual
framework to measure financial development of two major components in the financial sector, namely the
financial institutions and financial markets. According to this framework a financial sector’s development
should be evaluated in terms of financial depth, access, efficiency, and stability (Beck, Asli and Ross 2000).
These four dimensions are measured by using some proxy indicators stated in the framework. Therefore, this
study evaluates the development of banking sector of Bangladesh by using the framework given in the following
Table 1.

Table 1: Financial Sector Development Framework

Financial Institutions Financial Markets
• Stock market capitalization and
• M2 to GDP outstanding domestic private debt
• Deposits to GDP securities to GDP
• Gross value added of the financial sector to • Private Debt securities to GDP
Depth
GDP • Public Debt Securities to GDP
• Private Sector Credit to GDP • International Debt Securities to GDP
• Financial Institutions’ asset to GDP • Stock Market Capitalization to GDP
• Stocks traded to GDP
• Percent of market capitalization outside of
top 10 largest companies
• Accounts per thousand adults • Percent of value traded outside of top 10
• Branches per 100,000 adults traded companies
• % of people with a bank account (from user • Government bond yields (3 month and 10
Access
survey) years)
• % of firms with line of credit (all firms) • Ratio of domestic to total debt securities
• % of firms with line of credit (small firms) • Ratio of private to total debt securities
(domestic)
• Ratio of new corporate bond issues to GDP
• Turnover ratio for stock market
• Price synchronicity (co-movement)
• Net interest margin
• Private information trading
• Lending-deposits spread
• Price impact
• Non-interest income to total income
Efficiency • Liquidity/transaction costs
• Overhead costs (% of total assets)
• Quoted bid-ask spread for government
• Profitability (return on assets, return on
bonds
equity)
• Turnover of bonds (private, public) on
• Boone indicator (or Herfindahl Statistics)
securities exchange
• Settlement efficiency
• Volatility (standard deviation / average) of
stock price index, sovereign bond index
• Skewness of the index (stock price,
• Z-score sovereign bond)
• Capital adequacy ratios • Vulnerability to earnings manipulation
• Asset quality ratios • Price/earnings ratio
Stability
• Liquidity ratios • Duration
• Others (net foreign exchange position to • Ratio of short-term to total bonds
capital etc) (domestic, int’l)
• Correlation with major bond returns
(German, US)
Source: Beck, Asli and Ross 2000

5. Evaluation of Banking Sector’s Development in Bangladesh

5.1 Access to Banking Service
Access to banking services or financial inclusion refers to the ability of individuals to access appropriate
financial products and services. Chart 1 reports demographic accessibility to banking services in Bangladesh.
 400
377.87

350 328.35

273.05
300 252.47 267.77 274.63
259.03 263.33

250

200

150

100

50
7.04 6.98 7.01 7.04 7.08 7.28 7.53 7.85

0
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

No. of Bank Accounts per 1000 population

No. of Bank Branches Per 100000 Population

Chart 1: Demographic Penetration of Banking Services

Source: Financial Stability Report, Bangladesh Bank

Demographic penetration indicates that number of bank branches per 100,000 population increased
from 7.04 to 7.85 over the period of 2004 to 2011, reporting an increment of 11.5% and number of bank
accounts per 1000 population also increased by 49% over the same period. Trend in demographic penetration
indicates that access to banking services has increased overtime in Bangladesh. Bangladesh government has
been pursuing banks and financial institutions to follow Bangladesh Bank’s financial inclusion initiatives to
engage themselves in increased lending to the under-served or un-served economic sectors and population
segments, including micro and SME entrepreneurs, agricultural and other rural and urban farm and non-farm
productive activities for broadening access to financial services. Furthermore, in issuing new branch licenses to
banks, Bangladesh Bank has been following a policy of requiring at least one in every five new branches to be
in rural locations; with a view to pushing banking services physically closer to the rural population (Financial
Stability Report, Bangladesh Bank).

5.2 Financial Depth

Financial deepening refers to the increased provision of financial services with a wider choice of services geared
to all levels of society. Though it is difficult to obtain a satisfactory measure of financial deepening, it generally
means an increased ratio of money supply to GDP.
5.2.1 M3 to GDP
This study uses ratio of some broad measures of money supply (M3) to the level of GDP to evaluate the effect of
banking sector in financial deepening of a growing economy like Bangladesh. These monetization variables are
used in this study to illustrate the real size of the banking sector of a growing economy in which money supply
provides valuable savings and payment services. Broad money should rise at a faster rate in proportion to
economic transaction if financial deepening is taking place. The ratio of M3 to GDP indicates banks ability to
stimulate long-term savings relative to the level of nominal income. Bangladesh Bank begin calculating M3
from
1998, hence the Table 2 reports a rising trend in M3 to GDP ratio since 1998 and the ratio is reportedly
increasing at a faster rate till 2011. Therefore, as broad money measure (M3) rising at a faster rate relative to
GDP hence financial deepening is taking place in Bangladesh. This indicates that financial reform measures has
geared up diversification of financial intermediation services resulting in growth of banking sector relative to the
economy.
Table 2: M3 as a Percentage of GDP
Year M3/GDP (%)
1998-1999 34.7
1999-2000 38.5
2000-2001 42.5
2001-2002 45.4
2002-2003 47.8
2003-2004 49.0
2004-2005 50.7
2005-2006 53.2
2006-2007 54.2
2007-2008 54.3
2008-2009 56.8
2009-2010 61.8
2010-2011 64.8
Source: Economic Research

5.3 Efficiency
The proponents of financial reform argue that efficient operation of financial institution is prerequisite
to financial sector development. Following framework of World Bank, indicators which are evaluated in this
study to examine operational efficiency of banking sector of Bangladesh are profitability and competitiveness
within the sector.
5.3.1. Profitability
Table 3 presents profitability indicator ROA for sub-sector of banks over the period 1998 to 2011. As it is
observed from the Table 3, ROA differ largely by banking sub-sectors even after the reform measures. The ROA
of the SCBs were found to be nil during the period 1998 to 2000, which were even worst (negative) in case of
the DFIs, -3.7%. The huge loss of the DFI’s in 2000 was mainly due to making of provisions by debiting ‘loss’
in their book of accounts. During 2011, ROA of SCB and DFI have been 1.3% and less than 0.1% respectively.

Return on Asset (ROA) %

Bank 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Types
SCBs 0 0 0 0.06 0.10 0.08 -0.14 -0.10 0 0 0.70 1.0 1.1 1.3
DFIs -2.8 -1.6 -3.7 0.67 0.33 -0.04 -0.13 -0.13 -10.15 -0.27 -0.60 0.4 0.2 0.1
PCBs 1.2 0.8 0.8 1.12 0.75 0.69 1.24 1.06 1.07 1.28 1.37 1.6 2.1 1.6
FCBs 4.7 3.5 2.7 2.8 2.36 2.55 3.15 3.09 3.34 3.10 2.94 3.2 2.9 3.2
All 0.3 0.2 0 0.69 0.52 0.49 0.69 0.60 0.79 0.89 1.1 1.4 1.8 1.5
Banks
Table 3: ROA of Banking Sub-sector
Source: Annual Report, Bangladesh Bank

PCB’s ROA is found to have a positive but inconsistent trend, whereas the FCB’s showed a
consistently better trend over the last 14 years. The superior performance of foreign banks might be due to their
technological advantage and product differentiation capabilities which might have been eroded to an extent by
the local private banks in recent years. The ROA of PCBs and FCBs were strong, 2.1% and 2.9% respectively,
in 2010 implying a growing competition between them after the reform measures. Despite benefiting from high
interest spread, profitability has been modest for sub-sector of banks due to high operating cost resulting from
low level of automation and over-staffing in state-owned banks and inability to increase fee based income and
in most recent years mostly due to increased provisioning requirement of Bangladesh Bank.
5.3.2. Competitiveness within the Sector: Boone Indicator
Recently, a new approach to measuring competition has been introduced by Boone (Boone, 2008), which is a
measure of degree of competition based on profit-efficiency of the banking sector. It is calculated as
the elasticity of profits to marginal costs. The rationale behind the indicator is that higher profits are achieved by
more-efficient banks.
 0

-0.01 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

-0.02
-0.0240916
-0.03

-0.04
-0.05
-0.0616354
-0.06 -0.0663758
-0.0640303 -0.066174
-0.07 -0.0715051 -0.0731693 -0.077719
-0.0678639
-0.0750756
-0.0798925
-0.08
-0.0823391
-0.0825262
-0.09
Chart 2: Boone Indicator Index
Source: Economic Research

An increase in the Boone indicator implies a deterioration of the competitive behavior of financial
intermediaries. Hence, the more negative the Boone indicator, the higher the degree of competition within a
sector. In Chart 2, higher negative boon indicator over the period of 1999 to 2011 indicates growing competitive
market behavior of the banking industry.

5.4 Stability
Following the framework of World Bank, the stability of banking sector is evaluated in terms of Z score, Asset
Quality and Capitalization condition of banking sub-sectors.
5.4.1. Z- Score
Z-score is a widely used indicator of financial stability in the recent studies. It captures the probability of default
of a country's banking system, calculated as a weighted average of the Z-scores of a country's individual banks,
where the weights are based on the individual banks' total assets. Z-score compares a bank's buffers,
i.e. capitalization and returns, with the volatility of those returns. Intuitively, Z-score can be considered as an
inverse measure of insolvency risk, that is, the threat for a bank to be forced out of business because of a lack in
capital to compensate for a decline in the value of its’ assets (Roy, 1952). A higher Z-score implies a lower
probability of insolvency and a greater financial stability.
10
8.51622 8.66009
8 7.091914

6
5.409904
4
2.973001
2.22405 2.373586 2.779462
2 0.3597535 2.392439
1.929848 2.371433
0
1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
-2
-1.509809

-4

Chart 3: Average Z-Score of all Banks

Source: Economic Research

Chart 3 reports the average Z-scores at the bank-year level over the period of 1999 to 2011. The average
Z-score across all banks during 2011 is about 8.7, indicating that on an average, profits (ROA) have to fall by 8.7
times their standard deviation to deplete bank’s equity. The analysis suggests a modest improvement in financial
stability of the banking sector since 2007. Hence, this indicates that banking reforms occurring in terms
privatization of state banks and establishment of prudential regulation and supervision led to banks having better
opportunity to explore economies of scope and scale and thereby create more stable revenue.
5.4.2 Asset Quality
Asset quality indicated by nonperforming loan to total loan ratio has persistently been weak in Bangladeshi
banks with nearly one third of the loan portfolio being classified as non-performing loans (NPLs) for the
systemically important state-banks and DFIs. At end of 2011, the reported gross NPL to total loan ratios in Table
4 for the SCBs and DFIs were 11.3% and 24.6%, respectively, whereas they were more acceptable at 2.9% for
PCBs and FCBs. Meanwhile, the reported banking system gross NPL ratio of 6.1% during 2011 is much
improved compared to the highest 41% posted in 1999. The high level of NPLs at SCBs and DFIs is largely
attributed to politically directed lending extended on non‐market terms as well as lending under government‐
directed schemes. This position is also worsened by the limited credit appraisal, post-disbursement credit
monitoring and risk management skills in these institutions. Furthermore, some banks are reluctant to write-off
historically bad loans because of the poor quality of underlying collateral and therefore to avoid the recognition
of hefty losses on their income statement as well as the legal impediments in recovering loans that are written-
off.
Bank 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Type
SCBs 36.6 40.4 45.6 38.6 37.0 33.7 29.0 25.3 21.4 22.9 29.9 25.4 21.4 15.7 11.3
DFIs 65.7 66.7 65.0 62.6 61.8 56.2 47.4 42.9 34.9 33.7 28.6 25.5 25.9 24.2 24.6
PCBs 31.4 32.7 27.1 22.0 17.0 16.4 12.4 8.5 5.6 5.5 5.0 4.4 3.9 3.2 2.9
FCBs 3.6 4.1 3.8 3.4 3.3 2.6 2.7 1.5 1.3 0.8 1.4 1.9 2.3 3.0 2.9
All 37.5 40.7 41.1 34.9 31.5 28.0 22.1 17.6 13.6 13.2 13.2 10.8 9.2 7.3 6.1
Banks
Table 4: Gross NPL to Total Loan Ratio % (without adjustment for actual provision and interest
suspense)
Source: Annual Report, Bangladesh Bank

The decline in the NPL to Total Loan Ratio from 2001 to 2011 was aided by a reduction in absolute
NPLs, while in more recent years it was influenced by higher loan growth. Some reduction from the absolute
NPL base was also made possible due to write-off of long overdue NPLs, in keeping with guidelines issued by
Bangladesh Bank. With nearly 80% of all classified loans in the loss category, the reduction of NPLs through
recoveries seems remote hence write-offs appear to be the likely outcome. Asset quality is likely to come under
pressure with recoveries becoming tougher, therefore to wipe out unnecessarily and artificially inflated size of
balance sheet, uniform guidelines of write-off have been introduced in 2003. According to the policy, banks may,
at any time, classify write-off loans as bad or loss. Those loans, which have been classified as bad or loss for the
last five years and above and loans for which 100% provisions have been kept, should be written off
immediately. Besides loan loss provisioning and write-offs, stronger regulation, enhanced legal powers of the
banks to collect problem loans through the Money Loan Court and better screening of new loans facilitated by
the Credit Information Bureau have also improved the NPL ratio. The government made progress in this regard
by improving the legal framework for debt recovery by enacting and amending Acts from time to time. The
government strategy, which is being implemented by the Bangladesh Bank with assistance from the International
Monetary Fund (IMF) and the World Bank, includes limiting the annual credit portfolio growth of SCBs to 5%.
However, in response to the global financial crisis, the Government in March 2009 doubled the lending limits of
the SCBs to 10% to boost domestic investment. Banking sub-sector structural reform is well under way with the
assistance of the current Enterprise Growth and Bank Modernization Project and the Poverty Reduction and
Growth Facility. These initiatives aim to bring about a competitive private banking system by reforming the
SCBs through (Recent Reform Initiatives, 2012).
5.4.3 Capitalization
Capital adequacy focuses on the total position of banks' capital and the protection of depositors and other
creditors from the potential shocks of losses that a bank might incur. It helps absorbing all possible financial
risks like credit risk, market risk, operational risk, residual risk, core risks, credit concentration risk, interest rate
risk, liquidity risk, reputation risk, settlement risk, strategic risk, environmental and climate change risk etc.
Bangladesh Bank adopted BASEL-I norms in 1996 and it was followed till the end of 2009. Following BASEL-
I principles, banks were required to keep Capital Adequacy Ratio (CAR) of not less than 9.00 percent of their
risk- weighted assets with at least 4.5 percent in core capital or Taka 1.00 billion whichever is higher. Table 5
shows that aggregate capital adequacy ratio of the banking sector showed a downward trend since 1997 and
declined to
5.6% in 2005. However, in 2009, the ratio rose to 11.6%, the highest during the last 13 years. The SCBs could
not attain the required level till 2009 and DFIs failed to maintain required CAR except for the year 2004. FCBs
have the CAR much above the required standard over the stated period.
20
Bank 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Type
SCBs 6.6 5.2 5.3 4.4 4.2 4.1 4.3 4.1 -0.4 1.1 7.9 6.9 9.0 8.9 11.7
DFIs 6.0 6.9 5.8 3.2 3.9 6.9 7.7 9.1 -7.5 -6.7 -5.5 -5.3 0.4 -7.3 -4.5
PCBs 8.3 9.2 11.0 10.9 9.9 9.7 10.5 10.3 9.1 9.8 10.6 11.4 12.1 10.1 11.5
FCBs 16.7 17.1 15.8 18.4 16.8 21.4 22.9 24.2 26.0 22.7 22.7 24.0 28.1 15.6 21.0
Total 7.5 7.3 7.4 6.7 6.7 7.5 8.4 8.7 5.6 6.7 9.6 10.1 11.6 9.3 11.4
Table 5: Capital Adequacy Ratio % (CAR)
Source: Annual Report, Bangladesh Bank

Banking sector of Bangladesh is in a healthy state since capital adequacy related BASEL-II norm has
been adopted fully in 2010. Capital adequacy ratio of all banks was 11.4% in 2011 and 9.3% in 2010 as against
required CAR level of greater than or equal to 10% as described in BASEL-II accord. Table 5 shows that on 31
December 2011, in aggregate the SCBs, DFIs, PCBs and FCBs maintained CAR of 11.7%, -4.5%, 11.5% and
21.0% respectively. But individually, three PCBs and two DFIs did not maintain the minimum required CAR
whereas, all PCBs and FCBs complied with the minimum required capital. Bank’s having CAR below the
regulatory requirement are categorized as ‘problem banks’ and are asked to make-up for the shortfall
by increasing their paid-up capital. Until recent development in CAR ratio, capitalization levels of banks were
poor and affected by weak capitalization in state banks as well as marginal capitalization in some private banks.
The weak capitalization levels and inadequate provisioning on a high NPL base resulted in an extremely weak
CAR ratio over the stated period. Improvement in CAR ratio that is visible from 2007 was largely enabled
by a
‘valuation adjustment’ made during the conversion of three SCBs (Agrani, Janata and Sonali Bank) into limited
liability companies. Clearly, the capital base of the banking sector has tremendously expanded especially during
the last four years. This has been possible due to the transfer of a sizeable portion of banks’ profits into capital.
As a result, the base of banking system has become much stronger. At present, Bangladesh Bank is preparing to
adopt and implement the BASEL-III principles in near future. While capitalization could further improve in
future, due to the enhanced minimum capital requirements, sustaining such improvements would depend on the
ability of the banks to ensure their equity base is not affected by operational losses, especially in a challenging
environment with renewed pressure on asset quality (Financial Stability Report, Bangladesh Bank).

6. Conclusion and Policy Inferences

In spite of deterioration of some financial soundness indicator banking system continued to show growing
resilience over the years. Banking sector penetration enhanced due to bringing unbanked people into banking
network and expanding branch network. Banking sector’s contribution to economy grew notably, which is
evident as share of M3 to GDP reported increment. Banks are becoming more efficient as indicated by ROA,
which is repotted to be modest for banking sub-sectors but recorded a decline in 2011 due to creating additional
loan loss provision as a result of the new stricter loan loss provision requirement of Bangladesh Bank. Banking
sector is becoming more competitive as reported by Boone Indicator. Banking sectors ability to absorb losses
and overcoming risk of insolvency is improving over the years as reported by Z-Score. Non-performing loan
ratio is showing declining trend due to reported growth in earning asset and also because of writing-off bad
debts. At the end of year 2011 most of the banks except DFIs were able to maintain their minimum required
CAR of
10% in line with Pillar-I of the Base-II framework. Historically, the performance of banking sector has been
weak but this trend has started to reverse gradually with the initiation and enforcement of different reform
measures as reported in this study. However, it should be noted that confidence of individual’s in banking
system as a whole is the key in banking. As banks are vital institutions of financial intermediation in
Bangladesh, any loss of trust, may cause a shortage of funds in banking system and inefficient practices would
result in a failure of banking system and cause major economic slowdown in Bangladesh. Therefore, this study
suggests stricter enforcement of following factors for improvement and stability of banking sector:
• More stringent supervision of banks
• Stringent loan classification and provisioning
• Constraint on loan rescheduling
• Automation of the payment and settlement system
• Strengthening of the Credit Information Bureau (CIB)
• Broad-based social inclusion program
• Emphasis on risk management and internal control
framework;
• Satisfactory international reserve
• Implementation of Basel-III framework that focuses on minimum capital requirement, supervisory review
process and market discipline.
References
Annual Repot (1995-2011), Bangladesh Bank, Retrieved from http://www.bangladesh-bank.org.
Anandakumar, J., Khan, A. and Srivastava, A. (2009), “The Bangladesh Banking System, Bangladesh Country
Report”, Fitch Ratings, Retrieved from http://www.bracepl.com/brokerage/third_party_research/Fitch
%20Ratings%20%20Bangladeshi%20Banking%2
0System.pdf.
Beck, T., Asli, D.K. and Ross, L. (2000), “A New Database on the Structure and Development of the Financial
Sector”, World Bank Economic Review 14 (3), 597–605.
Boone, J. (2008), “A New Way to Measure Competition”, Economic Journal 118, 1245 -1261.
Chowdhury, A. (2000), “Politics, Society and Financial Sector Reform in Bangladesh”, Working Paper No. 191,
UNU World Institute for Development Economic Research, Retrieved from
www.wider.unu.edu/publications/working-papers/.../wp191.pdf.
Economic Research. Boone Indicator Index, Z-Score, M3, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, Retrieved from
http://research.stlouisfed.org.
Financial Stability Report (2010-2012), Bangladesh Bank, Retrieved from www.bangladesh-bank.org.
Islam, M.S. and Hamid, R (2012, December 25), “Three Decades of Banking Reform”, The Daily Star,
Retrieved from http://archive.thedailystar.net/newDesign/news-details.php?nid=262507.
Kabir, S. H. (2004), “Is Financial Liberalization a Vehicle for Economic Sector Efficiency of Bangladesh”, Bank
Parikrama XXVIII, 147-169.
Moral, L.H. (n.d), “Banking Sector Reforms in Bangladesh: Measures and Economic Outcomes”, Retrieved
from http://bea-bd.org/site/images/pdf/44.pdf.
Recent Reform Initiatives (2012), Bangladesh Bank, Retrieved from www.bangladesh-bank.org.
Rahman, M.M. (2012), “Banking Sector Reforms in Bangladesh and its Impact”, Asian Institute of
Technology, Thailand, Retrieved from
http://www.pmbf.ait.ac.th/www/images/pmbfdoc/research/report_mustafizurrahman.pdf.
Robin, A. I. (2008), “Financial Liberalization: What has really been achieved in Bangladesh”, The Hague
University, Netherlands, Retrieved from thesis.eur.nl/pub/6721/Iftekhar%20Ahmed%20Robin
%20ECD.pdf. Roy, A. D. (1952), “Safety First and the Holding of Assets”, Econometrica 20(3), 431-449.
The IISTE is a pioneer in the Open-Access hosting service and academic event
management. The aim of the firm is Accelerating Global Knowledge Sharing.

More information about the firm can be found on the homepage:

http://www.iiste.org

CALL FOR JOURNAL PAPERS

There are more than 30 peer-reviewed academic journals hosted under the hosting
platform.

Prospective authors of journals can find the submission instruction on the

following page: http://www.iiste.org/journals/ All the journals articles are
available online to the readers all over the world without financial, legal, or technical
barriers other than those inseparable from gaining access to the internet itself. Paper
version of the journals is also available upon request of readers and authors.

MORE RESOURCES

Book publication information:

http://www.iiste.org/book/

IISTE Knowledge Sharing Partners

EBSCO, Index Copernicus, Ulrich's Periodicals Directory, JournalTOCS, PKP Open

Archives Harvester, Bielefeld Academic Search Engine, Elektronische
Zeitschriftenbibliothek EZB, Open J-Gate, OCLC WorldCat, Universe Digtial
Library , NewJour, Google Scholar