Dems Empower ObamaGate Grifters [46] — Rationalizations for Procrastinations

TO GET UP-TO-SPEED ON THE UNDER-REPORTED INFO ABOUT OBAMAGATE — THE #1 POLITICAL

SCANDAL IN AMERICAN HISTORY, PLEASE READ/SKIM MY PRIOR 57 **ESSAYS** plus a probe of
the potential impact of declassification already impacting the Department of State.

Due to the desire to preserve lotsa prior thought-through issues, separate issues
focus on the [**Impeachment** and **Impeachment**] debacle (four pages)
and on the **previously-assessed** issues regarding ObamaGate (sixteen pages)
that often have been subsumed in essays already provided and subsequent ones;
these musings are not provided in any particular sequence BUT they ARE worth
skimming, for the goal is to provide any researcher a shortcut to information that
has actually been in the public eye chronically AND to dramatize why so many
loose-ends abound.

This is the 60th essay in this series of probing essays/hyperlinks intended to demonstrate (both to
the reader and to the author) that hope abounds that the interlocking issues surrounding
ObamaGate will soon be exposed via FULL DECLASSIFICATION WITHOUT REDACTION [inclusive of
Hillary/Unmasking]; inasmuch as prosecution is justified for leaking/perjury plus signing FISA
Warrants that weren’t verified, it always seems as if the most recent revelation[s] will be even
more damning than the aggregate of the prior disclosures, for “logical“ reasons.

Again note the news-summaries c/o *(Ace of Spades & PJMedia)* that provide
great cites that cannot be explored in a given “blast” e-mail); their perceptions
continue to be right-on regarding lotsa “hot” issues, even as many hyperlinks
overlap. {Reminder: Hyperlinks surrounded by asterisks (*) are amenable to being
read in their entirety.}

Once more, I am compelled to compose an update that is comprised more by commentary than
by hyperlinks after having read the headline article on RedState [If No Indictments Prior to the
Election, What Is Durham's End Game?]; I attempted to be polite when responding, suppressing
anger/angst:

These rationalizations fall flat, for Durham should IMMEDIATELY indict all of the
people known to have lied/leaked; I have consistently opposed the Flynn case
formulations composed by this author and filed a brief accordingly.
https://disq.us/url?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.scribd.com%2Fdocument%2F465
117543%2FFlynn-Filing-6-10-
20%3ATBkrTgoL5ff4XCmi4Att8upPKLY&cuid=1554500

My assertions have been heavily documented, with the goal being to empower
Judge Sullivan to COMPETE with Durham ["from the inside of the DoJ"] to NUDGE
 him to ACT; that the case was remanded to Sullivan from the District Court is c/w
my [lone, from the conservative perspective] efforts, notwithstanding the astute
legal analyses by this author.

https://disq.us/url?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.scribd.com%2Fdocument%2F479
125229%2FObamaGate-Essays-10-7-
2020%3A7t3UMlV2y_SSZRWxb7AF4JLEl08&cuid=1554500

What is composed is factually attractive—particularly the elements of a “conspiracy”—but this

essay does not preclude the ability to provide full disclosure regarding the leak/perjury perps;
these filings would be slam-dunks based upon what’s known in the public record.

Because he can multitask (accept guilty pleas while digging more deeply), I care
not that Durham’s investigation “expanded in recent weeks,” and it is now going
“well beyond origins of FBI Russia probe”; indeed, Trump indicated AG Barr has
enough evidence to charge Obama admin officials with spying on his campaign.

Furthermore, his hope that social-pressure could dissuade any Biden-AG from dismissing the case
is undermined by what’s a norm among the media noting, for example, how they flip blame
[“Toobin said Trump ‘Has Succeeded in Politicizing’ Mueller Investigation”]; the Dems would
continue to keep voters in the dark with this version of 'Truman Show.'

They would be channeling the perspective of a putative-AG, CUOMO, who

expressed the view of the WHITE KNIGHTS FOR DEEP STATE when he warned that
Trump shouldn’t ‘IMPUGN THE REPUTATION OF THE FBI’; this, in turn, would be
congruent with a blast-from-the-past, former CIA director Michael Hayden, who
wouldn't let the facts get in the way of a good sliming.

Proving again the danger of not yet having driven a stake through the hearts of the Clintons, note
that one author warned VOTE BIDEN GET "CROOKED" after Hillary Auditioned For SecDef in 5000-
Word Pro-Biden Article that Admitted Massive Defense Jobs Cuts Plan; along these lines, Trump
must Seize a Golden Opportunity to Punish Clinton Charity Fraudsters.

Candidly, I have been immersed in this issue for years (recalling my lineage of
being a “WaterGate Freak”) and honor reformulations of recent data such as in
Bongino’s new book, which fingers Obama’s fixer, Kathy Ruemmler, as being
involved in all these scandals; as lucid as they are, however, (e.g., The Mueller
Probe, Part 3: Mueller’s Band of Misfits, with part 1 here and part 2 here), there
ain’t much more THERE there that hasn’t been illuminated.

Dramatizing my “perseveration” concern is what Bongino conveyed on 4/13/2018:

• Is Loretta Lynch in serious legal trouble?

• A disturbing account of Bob Mueller’s ties to Obama administration officials involved in
the Obamagate scandal.
• Bob Mueller is scrutinizing this meeting in his Russia investigation.
• Read this piece and pay attention to the attorney representing a key figure in the Mueller
probe.
 • This older piece describes Kathy Ruemmler’s involvement in the IRS scandal.
• This Buzzfeed piece describes Kathy Ruemmler’s role in the Benghazi scandal.
• Who is Susan Rice’s Attorney? Oh, Kathy Ruemmler.
• Who is the Clinton Foundation Attorney? Oh, Kathy Ruemmler.
• Kathy Ruemmler replaced Bob Bauer at the White House (who left for Perkins Coie, the
law firm that paid Fusion GPS). Bauer replace Greg Craig, a Clinton impeachment attorney
who left for Skadden (a law firm central to the Mueller probe).
• Skadden’s role in the Mueller probe.
• Bob Mueller’s former colleague plays a central role in the Russian collusion narrative.

Checking back to the RedState comments, two follow-up threads are provided [along with what
they provoked c/o moi], all c/w my earlier expressed-viewpoints; the first thread was provoked
by my summary of what had been posted by most authors (ignoring the efforts to soothe them
by gbenton, who consistently forgot the echo-chamber has definable limits when facing Dems)
[“r_sklaroff: The consensus view of comments subsequent to mine are c/w my input that this
essay is "swampy"; Durham must indict "YESTERDAY"!”]:

gbenton
This essay was written by a former prosecutor. What you are calling 'swampy' is
perhaps just someone with actual experience gaming out what is could be
happening.
If indictments happened 'yesterday' and were rushed or allowed others further
up the food chain to escape proper scrutiny, does that serve justice?
Are the wheels of justice known to be slow or fast?
We all would have wanted to see justice done by now. On that we can agree.

r_sklaroff
Your assumption is awry, for indictments of a dozen leakers/perjurers
would be based on what's already known and wouldn't clear their
superiors, particularly noting how "high up the food chain" many already
are (Smirky Comey, Lovers Strzok-Page, etc.]; the "wheels" seem to need
a grease-job whenever a never-Trumper is at the wheel.

gbenton
From my understanding the IC laws are not so cut and dried.
Worst I think they'll get Comey and Stzrok on is perjury, perhaps.
Barr and Trump have to work within a system that's infested with
crooked accomplices. But I have faith they will go for the jugular
between now and the election when attention is at the peak in
the court of public opinion.

r_sklaroff gbenton • 5 minutes ago

Inasmuch as you admit indictments were indicated, they should
have been issued; inasmuch as you opine they are going for the
jugular, note that I prefer the carotid as a target.

r_sklaroff
 i discount the CV for reasons detailed in my prior reactions to his Flynn
analyses [vide infra] and there is NOTHING in the current spate of new
info [which ain't so new, noting what Bangino wrote 2 1/2 years ago] that
precludes abiding by Trump's not-so-subtle nudge.
https://bongino.com/april-13-2018-ep-698-the-case-against-mueller/
https://www.theblaze.com/news/trump-evidence-obama-biden-spying

gbenton
True, the info ain't new, but it's new to much of the public. There
probably was never enough time to push this through the court
system before this election, if we're honest. So timing is critical
so that the outrage meter is high right before the election. Not 6
months ago where it becomes 'old news'. but in October. With
more dots connected and more proof.
It's like a television series ending. That's what I expect Trump and
crew will produce.
The explicit or implicit promise will be that Trump needs to be re-
elected for any of these maggots to see justice.
My guess is it helps Trump win by larger margin AND costs Dems
the House and Senate.

r_sklaroff gbenton • a few seconds ago

Inasmuch as you suggest more shoes will drop, you
forget early-voting is already occurring; inasmuch as you
suggest this could become an October Surprise, you
forget the steep learning curve of an already deluged
public.

To be fair, this last comment provoked an exchange which served only to compound my fears:

gbenton
Who votes early? Decided people. Who pays attention in the final weeks?
undecideds. Your point is valid, but
a) this is where we are,
b) I expect a major information warfare carpet bombing for the remaining
days prior to the election,
c) I don't think it will be close.
Biden/Blow can't get anyone to show up up for their first joint appearance in AZ.
Trump can be in the hospital and the surrounding area is flooded with fans.
The public is desperate to be done with democrats in a large percentage. That's
my gut feeling and matches with Primary turnout and other metrics.
The public has a notoriously short attention span so October surprise with some
big bombshell that nukes the Dems remaining pillars of support would be well
timed.
That's not to say I wouldn't have wanted indictments long before now, but it is
what it is. Covid was its own kind of attack and I believe Durham's investigation
has expanded.
 So, in the end, I have faith more impact will be had after re-election. Can't prove
it, but I have faith.

r_sklaroff
basing your attitude on "faith" reflects dependence upon input from
echo-chambers, the identical ones upon which Hillary depended four
years ago

The second thread was provoked by an astute thinker [civil_truth: “As has been the case from
nearly the beginning, completing a prosecution depends on whether Trump or Biden wins the
November election.”], to which I replied:

r_sklaroff
Although I deeply respect the view of this author, my additional comments reflect
the view that this need not have been the case; we need not be playing "Beat the
Clock" when declassification has been delayed [probably by the Deep Staters
"advising" The Donald] and when so many obvious indictments could have been
achieved years ago [w/wo a "Report"].

Thus, until/unless something SUBSTANTIVE emerges, this series of essays will end here @ #60,
after having vacuumed/conceptualized every possible lead; it’s ENOUGH already!