CONSTRUCTIVISM

The philosophy behind constructivist pedagogies is that humans can understand only what they have
themselves constructed. A cross-disciplinary nature of constructivism has facilitated the development of
various branches of learning and teaching theories. The general concept that AClass maintains for
constructive pedagogies is the effort to identify “learner” as an important agent in the learning
process, their interest and characteristics are taken into consideration, and learning should build on
prior knowledge so learners understand how to construct new knowledge from authentic experience, to
support active participation and engaged learning. Constructivist learning is to make learning meaningful
to learners and to eliminate the struggle of learners with the power of teacher and knowledge.

Constructivist learning and teaching perspective represents a shift from viewing learners as responding
to external stimuli to seeing learners as “active in constructing their own knowledge;” they assert that
“social interactions are important in knowledge construction” (Bruning, Schraw, Norby, & Ronning,
2004). In constructivist perspectives, learners directly develop knowledge by experiencing things and by
reflecting on such experiences. Learners can actively learn through cognitive processes, constructing an
understanding of 1the world around them. Educators such as Piaget, Vygotsky, and Bruner contribute to
theories of constructivist learning. Constructivism is best understood in terms of how individuals use
information, resources, and help from others to build and improve their mental models and their
problem solving strategies (Woolfolk, 2007). The constructivist model of teaching enables learners to
construct knowledge, whether this construction reflects objective realities, or the construction is
perceived to sharpen one’s cognitive development for acquiring higherlevel intellectual development,
or the construction of knowledge should happen in a social interactive setting with the mediation of
individuals. There is no specific constructivist pedagogy, but we can conclude the principles that guide
the development of constructivist pedagogies, by comparing it with traditional behaviourist perspective
of teaching.

Constructivist Pedagogies vs. Traditional Pedagogies

Dimensions/Approaches 1 Constructivist Learning1 Traditional Learning1

Nature of learner1 Sees learners as unique individuals; Sees learners as homogenous mass
the unique nature of learners is an defined by chronological age upon
integral part of the learning process which learning targets and
1 materials are designed in the
curriculum; learners are expected
to meet the nominal standard

1
Responsibility for learning2 Resides with the learner; Rests with the teacher; learner is
emphasizes the active role of passive and receptive; learners
learners in the learning process in present what they learn from
looking for meaning 2 teachers2

Learning motivation 2 Develops learners’ motivation Learners’ behaviors are

through authentic experiences in reinforced by praises and rewards;
learners increase motivation by
conforming to standards and
handling problems; by gaining expected achievements; extrinsic 2
success, learners gain confidence
and motivation to embark on more
complex challenges; intrinsic

Role of Teacher2 Usually asks, supports, provides Often gives instructions from the
guidelines, and creates environment front; gives answers and expects
for learners to arrive at their own learners to be disciplined in
conclusions; continuous dialogue receiving the content of the
with learners; teacher should curriculum with the least
challenge learners 2 distraction and disturbances;
learners are under control in the
learning process

Interaction Teachers and learners learn from The learning experience is

each other; learners compare their objective; learners receive truth
version of truth with that of and knowledge from teachers
teachers and peers to arrive at a through given tasks; the teacher is
socially tested/socially negotiated an expert who gives expert advice
version of truth; learning task is the and instruction to get learners gain
interface between teachers and knowledge efficiently2
learners, both should develop
awareness of each other's
viewpoints and should look at their
own standards and values

Collaboration Learners collaborate to arrive at a Learners should be attentive and

shared understanding of truth in a disciplined to achieve the content
specific field; through set in the curriculum; they should
“scaffolding,” learners can extend try hard to fulfill expectations from
beyond the limitation of physical teachers; students seek advice
maturation to the extent that the from teachers in their study2
development process lags behind
the learning process 2
 Context3 Sees the context in which learning Knowledge is de-contextualized; it
occurs as central to learning; may not give learners skills to
learning is directly relevant to understand authentic tasks;
application; it acculturates students learning occurs when outcomes
into authentic and complex are measured
practices through activities and
social interaction

Assessment3 A two-way process involving A process carried out by the

interaction between teachers and teacher; a separate process of
learners; inextricably linked with the measuring how much learners
learning process to find out learning have gained and how far learners
achievements and quality of have reached at the end of the
learning experiences; courseware; learning process3
share possible ways in which
learner’s performance may be
improved

One of the popular constructivist pedagogies is named "scaffolding”. It is a technique whereby the
teacher models the desired learning strategy or task, then gradually shifts responsibility to the students.
The metacognition in problem solving are quite similar to a scaffolding teaching approach, which the
teacher conceptualizes how the learners can be guided to use skills and develop strategies to learn, they
offer assistance based on the ability, insufficiency and inexperienced condition of the learner, and little
by little, seeing the progress of the learners, the teacher signals the learners to take full responsibility in
their work. Scaffolding activities can be very useful in learning. For experts, they used to make use of
prior knowledge to solve a problem which is unfamiliar to them. They may think of a similar but simplier
situation, and manage their own self regulating mechanism which enables themselves to grasp new
skills and knowledge gradually and finally they can handle the new task satisfactorily. Scaffolding
support that is commonly used by trainers and teachers include modelling, coaching, contextual
support, asking “leading questions”, giving away parts of the solution.

Examples of Scaffolding Strategies

Scaffolding Methods 3 Examples3

Questioning 3 It is commonly used in solving abstract or conceptual problems

after exploring and practicing basic levels of understanding. For
example, in reviewing what children are doing in their social and
personal lives, teachers ask children critical questions, such as
“what do you think is the meaning of a society?” to push their
thinking beyond their limits.3
 Role playing and demonstration4 Show students the process by which skills and

concepts are applied by highlighting critical features that easily

fail learners. For example, an art teacher demonstrates how eye-
hand coordination can enhance one’s skills in modelling and
creative production of a ceremic art

Hints and examples 4 Give cues, hints, or guides at critical points to enhance
learners’ self-inquiry and self-discovery

Instruction4 Prepare guided task instructions to address the different

domains of understanding within a specific topic.4

Graded assignments/materials Prepare exercises that fit the individual interests and needs of
adaptation 4 learners, or design exercises that accomodates the interest and
academic levels so that learners can handle the basic level and
move on to the more advanced level of the subject

Self-assessment and peer Ask learners to assess their own learning outcomes and to
assessment4 conduct peer assessment to develop understanding-based
criteria4

Reference

https://www.bing.com/search?q=constructivistlearningjuner.pdf&PC=U316&FORM=CHROMN