0% found this document useful (0 votes)
56 views12 pages

222-مدمج 3

The document is a research paper submitted by a student named Khider Aymen to their teacher Chenini Abdelhak for the academic year 2019-2020. The paper examines the effect of social media on students' reading habits. It contains an introduction outlining the importance of reading skills for language learners. It also includes several research questions, a literature review on the concepts of reading, reading habits, and social media. The methodology section describes a survey conducted with 20 student respondents to study their social media usage and how it impacts their reading habits. The results section analyzes the findings of the survey related to time spent on social media and its effect on reading.

Uploaded by

PrinceMino
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
56 views12 pages

222-مدمج 3

The document is a research paper submitted by a student named Khider Aymen to their teacher Chenini Abdelhak for the academic year 2019-2020. The paper examines the effect of social media on students' reading habits. It contains an introduction outlining the importance of reading skills for language learners. It also includes several research questions, a literature review on the concepts of reading, reading habits, and social media. The methodology section describes a survey conducted with 20 student respondents to study their social media usage and how it impacts their reading habits. The results section analyzes the findings of the survey related to time spent on social media and its effect on reading.

Uploaded by

PrinceMino
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 12

Mohamed Khider University of

Biskra Faculty of Letters and


Languages Department of Foreign
Languages

Division of English

Research Paper
Submitted by:

KHIDER AYMEN

Title:

THE EFFECT OF SOCIAL MEDIA ON STUDENTS’


READING HABIT

Teacher:
CHENINI ABDELHAK

Academic Year : 2019 – 2020


TABLE OF CONTENTS

1) TABLE OF CONTENENTS ……………………………………1

2) INTRODUCTION.…………………………………………. 2

3) R s rc Qu st ns …….…………………………………….3

4) L t r tur R v w

4.1 T c nc pt f R ng……………………………………….. 3

4.2 T c nc pt f r ng b t ………………………………….4

4.3 T c nc pt f s c l ……………………………………4-5

5) t l gy ……………………………………. 5

6) R sults ………………………………… 5-9

7) C nclus n r c n t n ………………………………….. 10

8) R f r nc s…………………………………. 11-12
2- INT ODUCTION:

T b g f r gn l ngu g l rn r, n n st pr v s/ r l ngu g sk lls

g v ng qu l p rt nc t v ry sk ll b s n s/ r pr r kn wl g . T f ur

sk lls f l ngu g l rn ng r L st n ng, Sp k ng, R ng, n Wr t ng. R ng s

n ft st p rt nt l ngu g sk lls. It s c ns r s n b st x rc s f r

n nc ng n ’s c c p rf r nc . R gul r r ng ncr s s n ’s v c bul ry

n b l ty t t nk, pr v s n ’s v rb l n wr t ng b l t s.

Du t t c n l g c l v l p nt, r ng b ts r c ng ng. In ur s c ty

t y, w l t c n l gy s sl wly t k ng st y c ntr l v r n v u l l v s, t

r ng b t s f st v n s ng nt t n r. Stu nts n w l ck t sk lls f r ng.

Inst t y sp n r urs n s c l n tw rks. Stu nts’ r ng b ts t s ys

r str ct wt t p rs st nc us f s c l n tw rk ng. T us, t y n w b c

p ss v r rs w pr f r t s t b ck, nly t b nt rt n n n t put ff rt t

r ng. T y pr f r t sp n t w l ys c tt ng w t fr n s nst fr ng

r stu y ng. T s ff cts stu nts’ c c p rf r nc .


3- qu tion :

T f ll w ng r s rc qu st ns w r r s t gu t stu y:

1. Ar y u nv lv n us ng s c l n tw rk ng?

2. W c Typ s f s c l st s stly us by y u?

3. W t s y ur purp s f us ng s c l w bs t ?

4. H w uc t y u sp n ns c l p r y?

5. H w s s c l n tw rk ng s t ff ct y ur r ng b t?

4- Lit tu vi w:

4.1 T on t of ding:

T r r ny f n t ns f r ng cc r ng t xp rt:

H r r (1991:190) st t t tr ng s n x rc s n t by t y s n t

br n. T y sr c v ss g s n t br n t n s t w rk ut t s gn f c nc

ft s ss g s.

R ng s pr c ss n w c nf r t n fr t t xt n t kn wl g

p ss ss by t r r ct t g t r t pr uc n ng (An rs n, H b rt, Sc tt, 8c

W lk ns n, 1984)

B s n Gr ll t (2004) r ng s c nst nt pr c ss f gu ss ng, n w t n

br ngs t t n xt s ft n r p rt nt t n w t n f n s n t. In r ng, t

stu nts s ul b t ug t t us w t t y kn w t un rst n unkn wn l nts,

w t rt s r s rs pl w r s.

R ng s c pl x c gn t v pr c ss f c ng sy b ls f r t purp s f

r v ng n ng (r ng c pr ns n) n / r c nstruct ng

n ng(R ng,2020).
B s nt f n t ns b v t wr t r g ts c nclus n t t r ng c n b

fn s c pl x pr c ss t t s n by r r t c pr n t

wr t r’s purp s s. B s s, n r ng pr c ss t r r us s s br n t t nk n

r s n ut.

4.2 T on t of ding bit :

"R ng bt sb v rw c k s n n v u lt r b kf r

kn wl g r nt rt n nt r just t p ss t t " (S rly, 2011) n t s n

ss nt l l nt f r t v l p nt f p rs n l ty n nt ll ctu l c p c t s f

p pl . In t n t p rs n l n nt l v l p nts, r ng s cc ss t

s c l, c n c n c v c l f styl s (B n , 2011).

R ng b ts s ft n c ns r nt r s ft unt f t r ls b ng r ,

t fr qu ncy f r ng s w ll s t v r g t sp nt n r ng (W gn r, 2002)

4.3 T on t of o i l m di :

A t c n cr t c fnt n fs c l r s: “ gr up f Int rn t-b s

ppl c t ns t t bu l nt l g c l n t c n l g c l f un t ns f W b 2.0,

n t t ll w t cr t n n xc ng f Us r G n r t C nt nt” ( pl n &

H nl n, 2010)

S c l r nt r ct v c put r- t t c n l g st tf clt t t

cr t n r s r ng f nf r t n, s, c r r nt r sts n t rf r s f

xpr ss n v v rtu l c un t s n n tw rks.( S c l ,2020)

Acc r ng A n Ej r f (2012), s c l n tw rk ng r f rs t ct v t s,

pr ct c s n b v ur ng c un t s f p pl w g t r nl n t s r
nf r t n, kn wl g n p n n us ng nt r ct v ..

5- M t odology:

T stu y pt t surv y r s rc t , us ng s pl s z f 20 r sp n nts

.T t rg t p pul t n f t stu y w s stu nts f Engl s f culty,

r Un v rs ty, b tw n t g s f 21 – 24 y rs, b t s x s.

6- ESULTS :

Qu tion 1:

T bl u 1: Numb nd nt g of o i l m di tud nt ti i nt .

Y % No %

ANSWE

QYESTION

Ar y u nv lv n us ng s c l 25 100 0 0

n tw rk ng?

Fr t b v t bl 1, t w s cl r t t stu nts r nv lv ns c l s t s.

T f n ngs r v l t t 25(100%) f t stu nts r us ng f n t ly s c l

nt r l v s.

Qu tion 2

T bl u 2: Ty of o i l m di it mo tly u d by tud nt

M di N %
F c b k 10 44

Y utub 5 20

Inst gr 8 32

Tw tt r 2 8

Ot rs 0 0

Fr T bl 2 t c ul b bs rv t t ut f 25 r sp n nts 10 r pr s nt ng

b ut 44% f t stu nts st t t s c l st t y stly us s F c b k.

nw l , 5 (20%) f t stu nts r s rt t Y utub st s c l st t y

v s t. W l 8 (32%) n c t , t y us Inst gr , f ll w by Tw tt r w t 2 (8%)

r sp n nts r sp ct v ly.

Qu tion 3 : W t i you u o of u ing o i l m di

w b it ?

T bl u 3: u o fo u ing o i l n two k

u o F qu n y nt g

k p ng n t uc w t fr n s n f ly 7 28

t t n w fr n s 6 24

T v funny t 9 36

T r f r x n t n n t st 1 4

T s r n xc ng c c 2 8
nf r t n

T t bl 3 b v s ws t t stu nts us s c l n tw rk f r v r us r s ns. T

t bl n c t s t t j r ty f t us s c l n tw rk f r n n- c c purp s s

t nf r c c purp s s. T s s w ll xp s w nt g st nu b r f 22

(88%) f t r sp n nts n c t t r r s ns t b f r k p ng n t uc w t

fr n s n f ly, t t n w fr n s , n t v funny t , Ot rs 3 (12%) f

t r sp n nts st t us s c l n tw rk f r c c purp s s.

Qu tion 4

T bl u 4 : F qu n y of u of o i l n two k d y

Tim nt vi it F qu n y nt g

30 – 60 minut 2 8

1—2 urs 5 20

2—3 urs 7 28

3 urs + 11 44

T b v t bl 4 r v ls t t s stu nts sp nt w n t y v s t t rst f

nt r st. j r ty 11 (44%) f t r sp n nts sp nt r t n3 urs y. .

Ot rs 7 (28%) s t t t y sp nt fr 2t 3 urs us ng s c l s t s . 5 ut f

25 ft r sp n nts n c t t t t y us t b tw n 1 t 2 urs y. W l

2 (8%) f t stu nts s t t t y sp nt fr 30 t 60 nut w n t y us

s c l s t s. W n r l t t t bl . t w s cl r v nt t t t sp n ng
f r ft rt ns c l s t n ncy t r uc t t stu nts

sp n nt r p rs n l r ngs.

Qu tion 5 : How do o i l n two king it ff t you

ding bit?

T bl u 5 : Eff t of o i l n two king on tud nt ding bit

An w F qu n y nt g

D str ct w l r ng r n 10 40

cl ss.

R uc t f rr ng. 10 40

H lp y u t ncr s y ur 5 20

r ng b t.

Fr t b v t bl 5 , t w s cl r t t s c l n tw rk ng s t s n ff ct n t

r ng b t f stu nts. T f rst n c t n w s t t t y r str ct w n fr n s

c un c t w t t w l t y r r ng r n cl ss . T s c nst tut 10 (40%)

ft r sp n nts w s y s t t s.10 ut f 25 stu nt s t t us ng s c l

s n ft n c us s f r uc ng r ng t . W l 5 (20%) r sp n nts

s s c l n tw rk lp n ncr s r ng b t.

W nr l t t t bl t s st tt ncr s us f s c l n tw rk ng s t s

ng stu nt s ff ct stu nts r ng b t n g t v ly. W ng, C n n n

L ng (2011) wr t n ff ct f s c l n c ll g stu nts, s w t ts c l

us s n g t v ly ss c t wt c c p rf r nc . T y ls r p rt
t t b ut tw -t r s f t stu nts r f un us ng s c l w l n cl ss

stu y ng r ng w rk. T s ult -t sk ng ncr s s str ct n n b c s

tr nt l t stu nt p rf r nc . T f n ng s n t ff r nt fr t ssu un r

scuss n..

Acc r ng t C st n rr s (2011) s s c l w bs t s, suc s f c b k,

y utub n tw tt r g n p pul r ty, t y r ls b c ng ncr s ngly ng r us s

t y cr t s t stu nts t pr cr st n t w l try ng t c pl t w rk n

ss gn nt. In t r surv y f 102 stu nts, 57% st t t ts c l s

t l ss pr uct v . T f n ng s l nk w t t curr nt stu y b c us t c ul b

n tc t t stu nts r ly cult v t t bt fr ng.

lp u, ., C st n, D.,
CONCLUSION:

It s cl r t t st f t stu nts n r un v rs ty v t k n

v nt g fs c l t n nc t r s c l r l t ns p w t fr n s, r l t ns

n t rs. T y ls us t s c l t s r n xc ng c c

nf r t n. T ug t y nj y t s b n f ts fr s c l n tw rk, st f t

stu nts r p rt t tt s c l s r sult n str ct n n r ng bt

b c us f r uct n n t sp nt f r r ng .S nc t c n l gy s t n r r f

t y, t stu y t r f r c nclu t ts c l c ul b us w s ly, n t

nly f r k p ng n t uc w t fr n s, but c ul b us w s ly s s urc f r v t l

nf r t n t t w ul b f gr t b n f t t t stu nt n t s c ty.

omm nd tion :

1- Acc ss f un v rs ty stu nts t r ng t r ls n ff r nt g nr s n t r sp r

t s yb nsur .

2- Act v t s yb rg n z wt v wt v l p ng t r ng b ts f t

un v rs ty stu nts.

3-Un v rs ty stu nts yb nc ur g t v l pt rr ng b ts.

4- A ng un v rs ty stu nts t n swt x pl ry r ng b ts y lv r

sp c s n s r t r wn nc ur g ng xp r nc s n r ng b ks w t t

t rs.

6- Act v t s w r p rs ns suc s ut rs, j urn l sts, n publ s rs pp r s

gu sts yb rg n z n t nt r ct n f un v rs ty stu nts w t t yb

nsur .

0
C ll g n g nt s ul nt ns fy nl g t n nt c p gn n t n g tv

ff cts f s c l n tw rk ng ng t stu nts. F r ff ct v c p gn, t

s ul b t r ug us c, r , l ctur s n t r f r s f nt r ct n.

f n :

- A , E.E. & Ej r f , L. (2012). Stu nts’ Exp r nc w t F c b k n

N g r n L br ry n Inf r t n Sc nc (LIS) Sc l. s, 4(2)

75-83

- An rs n, R., H b rt, E., Sc tt, J. & W lk ns n, I. (1985). B c ng n t n f

r rs: T r p rt f t c ss n n r ng. W s ngt n, DC: N t n l

Ac y f E uc t n, C ss n n E uc t n n Publ c P l cy.

- B n , T. (2011). R ng b ts ng t stu nts f w ns c ll g , A U

l g r : surv y.

- Gr ll t, Pr nc s . (2004). D v op d sk s. Un t St t f

A r c :H rp r C ll ns Publ s rs.

- H r r, J r y. 1991. T Pr ct c f Engl s L ngu g T c ng (N w

E t n). N w Y rk:L ng n

- lp u, ., C st n, D., & rr s, J. (2011). T r l t ns p b tw n F c b k n t

w ll-b ng f un rgr u t c ll g stu nts. Cyb rpsyc l gy, B v r & S c l

N tw rk ng, 14(4), 183-189.-.

- pl n, A. ., & H nl n, . (2010). Us rs f t w rl , un t ! T c ll ng s

n pp rtun t s f S c l . Bus ss Ho zo s, 53(1), 59—68

- R ng.(2020).fr Wkp : ttps:// n.w k p . rg/w k /R ng

You might also like