Scribd
Upload
20 views1 page

Niñal v. Badayog

1) Pepito shot and killed his wife Teodulfa. 1 year and 8 months later, Pepito married Badayog without obtaining a marriage license. 2) The court ruled Pepito and Badayog's marriage was void from the beginning due to the lack of a marriage license. 3) An affidavit declaring Pepito and Badayog cohabited for 5 years was inadmissible because both parties admitted it was false, as Pepito was still married to Teodulfa during the alleged cohabitation.

Uploaded by

Napoleon Sango III
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
20 views1 page

Niñal v. Badayog

1) Pepito shot and killed his wife Teodulfa. 1 year and 8 months later, Pepito married Badayog without obtaining a marriage license. 2) The court ruled Pepito and Badayog's marriage was void from the beginning due to the lack of a marriage license. 3) An affidavit declaring Pepito and Badayog cohabited for 5 years was inadmissible because both parties admitted it was false, as Pepito was still married to Teodulfa during the alleged cohabitation.

Uploaded by

Napoleon Sango III
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

Niñal v.

Badayog issued an affidavit declaring that they


cohabited for more than five years
 Pepito shot Teodulfa which resulted to her  Court ruled that marriage was void ab initio
death. 1 yr and 8 months after her death for absence of marriage license.
Pepito married Badayog
 The affidavit declaring that they cohabited
 When Pepito died, the petitioners assailed for 5 years is inadmissible because both
the validity of their marriage claiming that it parties admitted to its falsity.
was void for lack of marriage license.
 The court ruled that the marriage was void
because even if Pepito and Badayog
cohabited for 5 years, it was not what the
law contemplated as Pepito was still
married to Teodulfa while he is cohabiting
with Badayog.
 The 5 year period should be a period of
legal union had it not been for the absence
of the marriage
 Void marriages can be questioned even
after death of either party, but voidable
marriages can be assailed only during the
lifetime of the parties and not after the
death of either.

Manzano v. Sanchez

 the judge solemnized the marriage even


though the husband has a subsisting
marriage
 Cohabiting for 5 years does not severe the
subsisting marriage.

DeCastro v. De Castro

 The marriage had no marriage license


because it was expired and instead they

You might also like