Section 1 21
Section 1 21
VI. As to whether they are open to the public or not        * Pwede bang incorporator ka at stockholder at the
Close Corporation- limited to selected person or            same time? YES
members of a family                                         * Lahat ba ng stockholder incorporator? NO
3 Basic Characteristics
     Stockholder should not exceed 20                      All incorporators are stockholders
     There is a restriction in transfer of shares- di      Not all stockholders are incorporators
        pwedeng ibenta yung share sa public
     The shares cannot also be sold at the stock           Section 6- Classification of Shares
        exchange                                            Doctrine of Equality of Shares
Open Corporation- open to the public (the public can             All shares are presumed to be equal.
buy the shares)
                                                            Partnership the presumption of the contribution is
VII. As to their relation to another corporation            equal
Parent or holding corporation- majority of directors
controlling the subsidiary corporation.                     Section 13 wala na tinanggal na. For purposes of
Subsidiary Corporation- related to another corporation      increase in capital stock kaya ididiscuss. In
that the majority of its directors can be elected either,   consonance in the increase of capital stock not because
directly or indirectly, by such other corporation.          of incompliance with Section 13
VIII. As to whether they are corporations in a true         Capital Stock- total number of shares of the
sense or only in a limited sense                            corporation
True Corporation- exists by statutory authority or               Authorized Capital Stock- pag inapproved ng
grant                                                               SEC
Quasi-Corporation- no legislative grant                          Subscribed Capital Stock- 25% of the
                                                                    Authorized Capital Stock
Quasi-Public Corporation                                         Paid-up Capital Stock- 25% of the SCS
    Franchise/ contract- given by congress (there               Unissued Capital Stock- portion not yet issued
       is a contract between the government and the                 to the public
       corporation)                                              Outstanding Capital Stock- defined under 137
    Public duties for profit                                       in the former law and in present under 173.
Quasi-Corporation                                           Example: ACS is 100,000
    No legislative grant (no franchise)                                   SCS- 25,000- minimum di pwedeng
    Not a corporation in its full sense                    bumaba otherwise it is a de facto corporation.
                                                                       PCS- 6,250- minimum pweden tumaas pero
Section 4- Corporations created by special laws or          bawal bumaba
charters                                                               UCS- 75,000
General Incorporation Law- RA 11232 (batas mismo,                      Minimum Capital of Corporation- 5,000
lahat ng corporation dito created)                                     Cooperative Capital- 15,000
                                                                 These are under the old law
       This is only for purposes of power. Kasi sa        * Can par value and no par value exist? YES
        power may increase of Capital Stock.               * Pwede bang yung shares lahat ay no par value? NO
                                                           walang bibili ng share mop ag ganon
* Wala ng minimum Paid-up Capital Stock at
Subscribed Capital Stock ngayon. (wala ng                  2. Voting- bumoboto for election of BOD (shares na
requirement)                                               pwedeng bumoto)
                                                           Non-Voting- GR di sila bumoboto (shares na di
Capital                                                    pwedeng bumoto)
    Actual property of the corporation- could be          E- under ASIMID Instances- they can vote under these
        building, land                                     instances
    Fluctuate yung value (nagdedepreciate)                     Amendment of the Articles
    Belongs to the corporation                                 Amendment of the by laws
    Can be Real or Personal Property                           Sale, lease, exchange, mortgage
                                                                Incurring      creating, increasing   bonded
Capital Stock                                                      indebtedness
    Something which is abstract                                Merger or consolidation
    Amount fixed                                               Investment of Corporate funds
    When issued it belongs to the Stockholders                 Dissolution of the corporation
    Always Personal Property (kaya nga share)
                                                           * Ang shares pwede lahat voting pero di pwede yung
Shares of Stock- management/ profit/ asset (MPA)           lahat non-voting kasi walang mag-eelect ng BOD
      Pag ikaw ay isang stockholder may part ka sa        * Pwede bang voting and non-voting? YES they can
        management you can vote. may share sa profit       co-exist
        – dividend and may share sa left over ng
        assets of the corporation. The mere fact that      3. Common- all shares are presumed to be equal
        you are a stockholder.                             Preferred- there are certain privileges (rights to
Characteristics of the Shares of Stock                     dividend, preference sa voting rights and sa assets at
1. Personal/Movable Property                               the time of dissolution)
2. Intangible Property
3. Does not constitute an indebtedness on the part of      4. Promotion- Binibigay sa promoter (the person
the corporation                                            convincing his incorporators to incorporate)
                                                           Founders- Incorporators (privilege the right to vote
Shares of Stock                                            and to be elected for the period of 5 years)
     Constitutes the interest (may share ka at
         ownership sa corporation)                         5. Share in Escrow (in trust)/ Escrow Stock
     Intangible                                           Example: ABC corporation nag-issue kay Pedro ng
     Can be issued even if it is not yet fully paid       share. Problema si Pedro di pa nya bayad yung share.
Certificate of Stock                                       Habang di nya bayad, hawag ni Juan yung share ni
     Written evidence                                     Pedro for in trust. For the benefit of Pedro in the event
     Tangible                                             that Pedro will be able to pay, then that is the time that
     Must be fully paid before iissue                     Juan will give the share to Pedro.
* Kailangan pa ba ang CoS para tawagin akong
stockholder? NO because the mere fact na                   6. Convertible- pwedeng common or preferred and
nagsubscribed ka, you are considered as a stockholder      vice versa
even though you did not pay.
* Can you issue a share of stock even though it is not     7. Redeemable v. Treasury- both are acquired by the
yet fully paid? YES                                        corporation
* Can you issue a certificate of stock even though it is
not yet fully paid? NO because of the Doctrine of          8. Watered Stock- VOID
Individuality of Subscription (Di pwedeng iissue           Law 1- Absolutely Simulated Contract
yung CoS unless it is fully paid)                          Characteristics
     Sabi ng SEC, it is considered on1, whole,                 Walang bayad, kulang ang bayad ibinigay ang
         indivisible contract                                     share. Ibinigay ang certificate of stock. VOID
                                                                Anong tawag sa stock na ibinigay pero walang
Classes of Shares                                                 bayad o kulang ang bayad? Watered Stock
1. Par Value- nakalagay yung amount sa face ng
certificate of stock                                       9. Over-issued/ Spurious stock (fake)
No Par Value- di nakalagay yung stated value pero               100,000 is the ACS. Nag-issue ng 100,000
merong issued price ( no less than 5 peso)
10. Original/ Formative- number of shares from the               Delinquent
beginning
                                                            Section 7- Founders’ Shares
11. Increased- pag itinaas ang share                             Exclusive right to vote and be voted for
                                                                 5 years limitation (duration of the founders’
Statutory restrictions regarding the issuance of no                 shares)
par shares (5)                                                   Approval of SEC is required\
     Batas mismo ang nagsasabi na bawal o kaya
         may restriction                                    Redeemable
1. Entities not allowed to issue no par shares (7)               The stipulation is needed para maging
     Bank                                                          redeemable
     Trust Companies                                            Di kailangan ang Unrestricted Retained
     Insurance Companies                                           Earning (URE)
     Building and Loan Association                         * Ano yung stock na pwedeng bilhin ng corporation
     Preened Companies                                     kahit walang URE? Redeemable
     Public Utilities
     Other corporations authorized to obtain or            Treasury
         access funds from the public                           Di kailangang yung stipulation
Educational corporation are allowed                             Kailangan ang Unresricted Retain Earnings
2. All preferred shares has stated par value- Why?          * Similarity parehas nirereacquire ng corporation
How can you compute the preference as to dividends,
voting rights if there is no stated par value.              Section 8- Redeemable shares
                                                                 No voting rights and no need for Unrestricted
3. No par- fully paid, non-assessable, not liable for               Retained Earnings
corporate creditors (basic characteristics of no par)            These are the shares reacquired by the
                                                                    corporation with a stipulation that it can be
* Saan applicable ang Trust Fund Doctrine? Par                      reacquired notwithstanding with the absence
Value                                                               of URE
Retroactive- corporations existing prior to February          Whether you are an OPC or an Ordinary
23, 2019                                                         Corporation there is no minimum CS
     GR- perpetual (the law has no maximum                   Is there a minimum capital stock requirement?
        period)                                                  NONE
     E- They have chosen Fixed                               Is there a minimum paid up capital stock
     Vote- Majority of the Outstanding Capital                  requirement? NONE
        Stock                                                 Is there is a percentage requirement? YES
     Period to decide- 2 years (from February 23,       * Before there was a minimum paid up under Section
        2019, they have 2 years to decide what have      13- 5,000
        they chosen for those corporation which are
        existing. They can choose perpetual or a         Cooperative- there is a minimum paid up capital
        corporation with a fixed term.)                  stock.
Effect of violation (not distinguishable) Effects if           * If the corporation has met all the requirements is it a
your name is found not to be distinguishable                   discretionary or ministerial act on the part of the SEC
      SEC will summarily order- without an                    to issue? Ministerial that is the reason why you can
          opponent, the SEC with its own initiative can        fila a case for Mandamus if the corporation still
          issue:                                               refuses to issue the COI
                1. Cease and desist order (SEC is
                  telling you not to use the corporate         Section 19- De Facto Corporation
                  name)                                        De Jure- all the legal requirements have been met so it
                2. Removal of all visible signages            is a valid corporation
                3. Fails to comply- cited for contempt        De Facto- one some or maybe or some of the
                  (damages amounting to P30,000)               requirements have not been complied
                4. Administratively/Criminally liable
                5. Revoke the COI                             Requisites of De Facto Corporation
If it is distinguishable                                       1. Valid law- RA 11232
      The SEC will allow you to file the AOI
2. Attempt to incorporate/organize- the corporation        Section 20- Corporation by Estoppel
has filed the name verification, file the articles         De Jure- complied all the legal requirements (legal)
3. Actual user of the corporate power- the corporation     De Facto- has the AOI and COI but it failed to satisfy
has elected the BOD, elected the officers and file the     1 or some of the requirements under the law so it can
by-laws (operating)                                        be subjected to a Quo Warranto Proceeding
4. Issuance of COI despite of the non-compliance with      Corporation by Estoppel- No AOI, no COI basically
the legal requirements                                     it is not a corporation
                                                           Effect of corporation by estoppel- persons
* De Facto does it have articles? YES                      comprising it are liable as a general partner (up to
* Does it have certificate? YES but the problem was        the extent of their separate property)
issued but there is something violated.
Some Reasons why we are going to declare the               Legitimate Corporation- Stockholders are not liable
corporation as a de facto                                  up to the extent of their separate property (trust fund
     Corporate name resembles, it is not                  doctrine)
        distinguishable
     Forgery in the articles                              Ostensible corporation/estoppel-
     Citizenship                                              Can you evade your liability or use it as a
     Percentage Requirement                                      defense that you are a corporation by estoppel
De Jure and De facto                                              so that you will not become liable? NO
     Technically they are the same because you                Provided, however, That when any such
        apply all the principle in de facto subject only          ostensible corporation is sued on any
        to the one exception.                                     transaction entered by its as a corporation or
                                                                  on any tort committed by it as such, it shall
Remedy against De Facto- Quo Warranto                             not be allowed to use on any its lack of
(questioning the legal existence of the corporation)              corporate personality as a defense. Anyone
Example: A case was filed against ABS-CBN                         who assumes an obligation to an ostensible
questioning its legal existence (Quo-Warranto).                   corporation as such cannot resist performance
Solicitor general was questioning the existence of                thereof on the ground that there was in fact no
ABS-CBN                                                           corporation.
     Quo Warranto- filed against De Facto                     Example 1: I’m a corporation by estoppel can
         corporation and only the solicitor general can           I use that as a defense? NO
         file                                                  Example 2: Suppose a TP transacted to me
                                                                  and I’m a corporation by estoppel. Can the TP
Direct Attack                                                     evade the liability? NO
    Directly questioning the legal existence of the
        corporation.                                       Section 21- Effects of Non-use of Corporate
    The direct attack is the quo warranto                 Charter and Continuous Inoperation
        proceeding to be filed by the solgen               Non-Use- form the start (issuance of certificate by
Collateral Attack                                          SEC), it becomes a perpetual corporation
    ABC corporation (de facto) and Pedro. ABC                  Did not do anything
        extended a loan to Pedro. Pedro does not want           What if in a period of 5 years, it did not elect
        to pay because it is a de facto corporation.               the BOD, did not elect the officers and did not
        Indirect because even though ABC is a de                   file the by-laws?
        facto corporation, it is only the solicitor             Deemed Revoked- the corporation is dissolve
        general who can file the case. Anyone                      (COI will be revoked)
        questioning the legal existence, which is not a    Continuous Inoperation- What if during the 5-year
        quo warranto proceeding, which is not filed by     period they were able to elect the BOD and officers
        the solicitor general is a collateral attack.      and filed the by-laws. All of a sudden they cease to
    Not allowed against a de facto corporation.           operate. It is possible in the first year of operation they
                                                           did something and later on, stop doing it.
* If you are De Jure, you cannot be subjected to a              Did something but afterwards for a period of 5
direct or a collateral attack. But if you are De Facto             years they stopped operation
corporation, can you be subjected to a collateral               Placed under delinquent status for 2 years
attack? NO. To a direct attack? YES- Quo warranto                  (extension for you to operate)
                                                                          If compliant- order will be lifted (it is
De Facto- has COI but there is a violation                                   now again a valid corporation)
Corporation by estoppel- No articles, no certificate                      If not compliant- the revocation of
but it is operating as if it is a corporation.                               COI will happen
                  Old       Revised      Cooperative
  Non- Use      2 years     5 years        2 years
 Continuous     5 years     5 years        2 years
 Mandamus                         Quo-Warranto
 * Compelling the performance     * Questioning the
 of an act                        legal existence of the
 Example: The SEC does not        corporation. It is a
 like to issue the COI, the       direct attack filed by
 corporation does not allow the   the          Solicitor
 stockholder to examine the       General.
 books or allow the stockholder
 to attend the meeting.
 * Non-use (5 years)              *         Continuous
                                  inoperation (5 years)
 Section 16                       PD 902- A