Conceptualizing The Role of Organizational Commitment
Conceptualizing The Role of Organizational Commitment
ABSTRACT: This study aims to examine and analyze the influence of organizational culture, work
environment and organizational commitment on organizational citizenship behavior and employee performance.
This research was conducted on 60 respondents using a quantitative descriptive approach. The approach used in
this research is Structural Equation Model (SEM) with Smart-PLS analysis tools. The results showed that
organizational culture, The work environment, Organizational commitment has a significant positive effect on
organizational behavior citizenship. Organizational Culture, Work environment, Organizational Commitment
has a significant positive effect on Employee Performance. Organizational Citizenship Behavior has a
significant positive effect on employee performance.
                                          I.       INTRODUCTION
          Planned and sustainable human resource development is an absolute necessity especially for the future
of the organization. Management is required to develop new ways to keep employees at high productivity and
develop their potential to make maximum contributions to the organization. (Kartika, 2016; Mugiono et al,
2020; Nurhayati, 2017; Hafid and Prasetio, 2017).. An employee will have a high level of performance if there
is a match between work and ability. If this is fulfilled, then there will be a feeling of responsibility towards its
workers and their willingness to participate in achieving organizational goals through the implementation of
tasks to the fullest. (Jufnidar, 2018). According to Elisa Hilda (2016), To be able to survive and continue its
business, companies need to improve themselves and begin to consider all aspects related to the company's
operations.
          Acording Soelton et al, 2020; Ramli et al, 2019; Sebayang, 2017; Makel and Trang , 2015, argue that
efforts to improve employee performance, including by paying attention to the work environment, because
everything around workers can affect themselves in carrying out the tasks that are charged. So that it will affect
the organization's culture, work environment and commitment to work so that organizational citizenship
behavior will be realized which will affect employee performance in order to increase company productivity.
Every individual who is incorporated in an organization has a different culture. Like humans, organizations also
have certain characteristics. Through these characteristics we can also find out how the character of the
organization. We are familiar with this organizational culture (Soelton et al, 2020; Soelton et al, 2018; Kartika,
Ika. 2016).
          Organizational culture directs employee behavior to improve work skills, commitment and loyalty, and
extra role behavior such as: helping co-workers, volunteering to do extra activities, avoiding conflicts with
coworkers, protecting organizational property, respecting applicable regulations, tolerating less than ideal /
pleasant situations, giving constructive advice, and not wasting time at work. (Andi Tri Haryono, 2016).
According to Soelton and Saptarini (2018), organizational culture refers to a system of shared meanings shared
by members that distinguishes the organization from other organizations. The formation of an organizational
culture based on the vision and mission of the organization or company created as an effort to fulfill the creation
of company goals. Each organization has a different culture so employees must adjust the organizational culture
where the employee is located. Organizational culture as a foundation for employees both in norms and
employee behavior in an effort to achieve organizational goals. (Putra, Susilo, Aini, 2018). Waspodo,
Lindawati, Sholikhah, (2019). Explain to create a pleasant friendly atmosphere where employees can have
identification with the organization and feel satisfied with their work, and explain individual perceptions about
the work environment based on their daily experiences.
          Research conducted by Sukmawati and Surachman (2013), states that psychological evaluation of the
work environment by individuals is starting to become increasingly important for extra role behavior (OCB),
which can further explain what individual needs are in the workplace. A work environment that is in accordance
*Corresponding Author: Mochamad Soelton                   www.aijbm.com                                  178 | Page
                                               Conceptualizing The Role of Organizational Commitment
with the needs of employees will create positive work enthusiasm so that employees will further enhance good
work performance, employees will feel responsible for their work so that they do not require more supervision
from the company but instead remind and supervise each other so that together the same can achieve the
achievements and goals that the company expects (Lindawati, 2019).
         The factors that influence OCB and other performance are Organizational Commitment. According to
Soelton and Rahasidhi (2018), states that an organizational commitment shows a power of someone in
identifying involvement in an organization. So that organizational commitment will create a sense of belonging
for employees towards the organization. It can also be concluded that organizational commitment is an attitude
regarding employee loyalty to the organization and is an ongoing process of organizational members to express
their concern for the organization and this continues to success and prosperity. (Restu Fajar Nurhayati, 2019).
According to Soelton & Yasintha (2018), argues that if the office wants to create a comfortable work
environment situation, it should pay more attention to the arrangement of workspaces such as the placement of
work equipment, lighting, noise, and comfort that can later improve a better work environment.
Figure 1. Framework
                                        III.      METHODOLOGY
         The variables in this study consisted of the independent variable (X) and the dependent variable (Y).
The research design used is causal using a quantitative analysis approach. According to Sugiyono (2014), causal
design is a causal relationship between the independent variable and the dependent variable. This study is a
study to determine the effect of three independent variables namely cultural organization, work environment,
and organizational commitment to the dependent variable, organizational citizenship behavior and employee
performance. In this case, this study aims to determine the effect of cultural organization, work environment,
and organizational commitment to organizational citizenship behavior and employee performance. The
population in this study were all employees 60 people. Dtermination of the sample used in this study uses the
type of saturated sample method. According to Arikunto (2012) if the total population is less than 100 people,
then the total sample is taken, but if the population is greater than 100 people, then it can be taken 10-15% or
20-25% of the total population. Based on this study because the population is not greater than 100 respondents,
the authors take 100% of the population with 60 employees. The method of data analysis in this study uses
component or variance based Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) where the data processing uses the Smart-
Partial Least Square (Smart-PLS) version 3.0 program. PLS (Partial Least Square) is a model of SEM-based
variance.
                                            Table 4.10 Validity Result
                                                            Outer Loading
            Variable                     Indicator                                Description
                                                  Outer Loading
         Variable               Indicator                         Description
         Work Environment       L1
                                L2                0,611
                                                  0,854           Valid
                                                                  Valid
                                L3                0,818           Valid
                                L4                0,879           Valid
                                L6                0,811           Valid
                                L8                0,661           Valid
                                L9                0,650           Valid
Figure 4.2
Table 4.14
From the data in Tables 4.12 and 4.13 it can be concluded that the square root of the average variance extracted
(√AVE) for each construct is greater than the correlation between one construct and the other constructs in the
model. AVE value based on the table above, it can be concluded that the construct in the estimated model meets
the criteria of discriminant validity.
Table 4.16
Based on Tables 4.15 and 4.16 that the results of testing the reliability and cronbach's alpha composite showed
satisfactory value, because all latent variables have a reliable composite value and cronbach's alpha ≥0.70. This
states that all latent variables are said to be reliable.
Table 4.17
         The variable model of organizational citizenship behavior and employee performance can be said to be
strong because it has a value above 0.67. model of the influence of independent latent variables (cultural
organization, work environment, and organizational commitment) on organizational citizenship behavior and
employee performance gives an r-square value of 0.792 (organizational citizenship behavior) which can be
explained by the variability of cultural organization constructs, work environment, and organizational
commitment of 79.2% while 20.8% is explained by other variables outside of the study and by 0.815 (employee
performance) which can be interpreted that the variability in the construct of employee performance can be
explained by the variability of the construct of cultural organization, work environment, organizational
commitment and organizational citizenship behavior by 81 , 5% while 18.5% explained by other variables
outside the study.
         The calculation results above show a predictive-relevance value of 0.961 which is greater than 0 (zero).
This means that 96.1% of the variation in the variable organizational citizenship behavior and employee
performance (the dependent variable) is explained by the independent variables used. thus the model is said to
have a relevant predictive value.
Table 4.18
Figure 4.3
organizational commitment has a positive and significant effect on employee performance. (Kurniawati,
Sunaryo and Khoirul, 2019; Winarno and Hermana, 2019; Liu and Huang, 2019; Aktar and Pangil, 2018)
5.2. Recommendations
  1)    Companies pay more attention to the comfort of organizations in the company so that each employee
        can feel comfortable in working.
  2)    The company should pay attention to the work space for its employees so that employees can work
        better in doing their jobs.
  3)    The company can make decisions for the responsibilities of each of its employees so that the
        responsibilities do not match the work and level accepted by the employee.
  4)    The company must be able to control every performance and result of every employee's work, so that
        they can see and reprimand employees who are not working well.
  5)    The company must pay attention to the skills of each employee, by holding training every year so that
        the skills and abilities of each employee can be improved.
         Further Research Suggestions, This study aims to examine and analyze the influence of organizational
culture, work environment and organizational commitment on organizational citizenship behavior and employee
performance. The results showed that organizational culture, The work environment,
         Organizational commitment has a significant positive effect on organizational behavior citizenship.
Organizational Culture, Work environment , Organizational Commitment has a s ignificant positive effect on
Employee Performance. Organizational Citizenship Behavior has a significant positive effect on employee
performance. According to the hypothesis we developed, we can look for it in the future with a variety of
variables and more population
                                            REFERENCES
[1].    Adi, A. Z., and Ratnasari, S. R. 2015. Pengaruh Komitmen Organisasi, Penghargaan dan Kepuasan
        Kerja terhadap Perputaran Karyawan pada Perbankan Syariah di Kota Batam. Etikonomi, 14 (1): 35-
        50.
[2].    Ardiansyah, Y., & Sulistiyowati, L. H. (2018). Pengaruh Kompetensi dan Kecerdasan Emosional
        Terhadap Kinerja Pegawai. Jurnal Inspirasi Bisnis dan Manajemen, 2(1), 91-100.
[3].    Dessler, Gary. (2015). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.
[4].    Fisher et al., (2009). Beyond work and family: A measure of work/nonwork interference and
        enhancement. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology. American Psychological Association. Vol
        14, No.4, 441-456.
[5].    Goleman, Daniel (2015). Emotional Intelligence : Kecerdasan emosional mengapa EI lebih penting
        daripada IQ, Jakarta: PT. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
[6].    Hafid, M., & Prasetio, A. P. (2017). Pengaruh Work-Life Balance Terhadap Turnover Intention (Studi
        pada Karyawan Divisi Food & Beverage Hotel Indonesia Kempinski Jakarta). SMART-Study &
        Management Research, 14(3), 54.
[7].    Handayani, Arri. (2015). Studi Ekplorasi makna keveimbangan kerja keluarga pada ibu bekerja.Jurnal
        seminar dan Kemanusian.ISBN: 978- 979-796-324-8.
[8].    Hendrayani, D. (2013). Pengaruh Komitmen Dan Job Insecurity Terhadap Intensi Turnover Pada
        Operator Garuda Call Center. MIX: Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen, 3(1).
[9].    Kim, H.K.. (2014). Work-Life Balance and Employees Performance: The Mediating Role of Affective
        Commitment. Global Business and Management Research: An International Journal, 6, 37-51.
[10].   Luthans, Fred. Organizational Behavior. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2011.
[11].   Mahiri, E. A. (2016). Pengaruh Pendelegasian Wewenang dan Komitmen Organisasi Terhadap Prestasi
        Kerja Pegawai Dinas Pendidikan Kabupaten Majalengka. MAKSI, 3(1).
[12].   Majdalani, J. F., & Maamari, B. E. (2016). Emotional intelligence, a tool for customer satisfaction.
        Journal for Global Business Advancement, 9(3), 275-283.
[13].   Mangkunegara, Anwar Prabu. (2016). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia Perusahaan. Cetakan
        Kesebelas. Remaja Rosdakarya. Bandung.
[14].   M Soelton, P Amaelia, H Prasetyo. 2020. Dealing with Job Insecurity, Work Stress, and Family
        Conflict of Employees. 4th International Conference on Management, Economics and Business
        (ICMEB 2019). atlantis-press.com. 2020/2 (167-174).
[15].   M Soelton, D Amalia, N Noermijati, B Wahyudiono. 2020. Self-Esteem: The Levels of Religiosity in
        Job Insecurity and Stress in Government Company. 4th International Conference on Management,
        Economics and Business (ICMEB 2019). atlantis-press.com. 2020/2 (302-310).
[16].   F Rohman, YB Abadi, M Soelton, N Prasetyo, ET Saratian. 2020. The Effect of Environmentally
        Friendly Paper Toward Purchasing Intention. 4th International Conference on Management,
        Economics and Business (ICMEB 2019). atlantis-press.com. 2020/2 (120-126).
[17].   M Soelton, D Hardianti, S Kuncoro, J Jumadi. 2020. Factors Affecting Burnout in Manufacturing
        Industries. 4th International Conference on Management, Economics and Business (ICMEB 2019).
        atlantis-press.com. 2020/2 (46-52).
[18].   M Mugiono, BH Purwoko, M Soelton, R Yuvitasari. 2020. Recognizing How the Job Involvement,
        Burnout, and Self-Efficacy Work Influences the Work Stress at International Hospitals. 4th
        International Conference on Management, Economics and Business (ICMEB 2019). atlantis-
        press.com. 2020/2 (264-270).
[19].   M Soelton, PA Lestari, H Arief, RL Putra. 2020. The Effect of Role Conflict and Burnout Toward
        Turnover Intention at Software Industries, Work Stress as Moderating Variables. 4th International
        Conference on Management, Economics and Business (ICMEB 2019). atlantis-press.com. 2020/2
        (185-190).
[20].   DF Suzabar, M Soelton, M Umar, J Triwulan. 2020. Recognizing How the Time Demands of Work
        Influences the Turnover Intention in Banking Industry. 4th International Conference on Management,
        Economics and Business (ICMEB 2019). atlantis-press.com. 2020/2 (40-45).
[21].   A Nanda, M Soelton, S Luiza, ETP Saratian. 2020. The Effect of Psychological Work Environment
        and Work Loads on Turnover Interest, Work Stress as an Intervening Variable. 4th International
        Conference on Management, Economics and Business (ICMEB 2019). atlantis-press.com. 2020/2
        (225-231).
[22].   McShane, Steven L. and Mary Ann Von Glinow. Organizational Behavior. New York: McGraw-Hill,
        2010.
[23].   Mobley, W. H. (2011). Pergantian Karyawan : Sebab, Akibat dan Pengendaliannya (Terjemahan).
        Jakarta: PT Pustaka Binaman Pressindo.
[24].   Moorhead, G., & Griffin, R. (2013). Organizational Behavior: Managing People and Organization (9th
        ed.). Mason: South Western Cengage Learning.
[25].   Nasution, M. I. (2017). Pengaruh Stres Kerja, Kepuasan Kerja Dan Komitmen Organisasi Terhadap
        Turnover Intention Medical Representative. MIX: Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen, 7(3).
[26].   M Nurhayati, A Thoyib, DW Irawanto, 2019. Impersonal Trust and Perceived Organizational Politics
        on Organizational Commitment. European Research Studies Journal 21 (3), 391-403 | vol: | issue: |
        2018
[27].   M Nurhayatia, A Thoyib, N Noermijati, 2017. The Role of Political Skills for Organizational
        Commitment . International Journal of Economic Perspectives 11 (4), 493-498 | vol: | issue : | 2017
[28].   Mochamad Soelton, Noermijati Noermijati, Fatchur Rohman, Mugiono, Irfan Noviandy Aulia and
        Rustam Efendi Siregar. 2020. Reawakening perceived person organization fit and perceived person job
        fit: Removing obstacles organizational commitment. Management Science Letters 10 (2020) 2993–
        3002 homepage: www.GrowingScience.com/msl
[29].   Soelton, M., Visano, N. A., Noermijati, N., Ramli. Y., Syah. T. Y. R., & Sari, Y. J. (2020). The
        Implication Of Job Satisfaction That Influence Workers To Practice Organizational Citizenship
        Behavior (Ocb) In The Work Place. Archives of Business Research, 8(5). 33-48 Publication Date: May
        25, 2020 DOI: 10.14738/abr.85.8139.
[30].   Soelton, M., Visano, N. A., Aulia, I. N., Rohman. F., Abadi. Y. B., & Adelia, D. (2020). Factors That
        Affect The Masinical Productivity In The Indonesian Railway Industry. Archives of Business
        Research, 8(5). 49-62. Publication Date: May 25, 2020 DOI: 10.14738/abr.85.8183.
[31].   Mochamad Soelton, Yudha B. Abadi Nicko Gana Saputra Eko Tama Putra Saratian Harefan Arief,
        Devi Haryanti. 2020. FACTORS AFFECTING TURNOVER INTENTION AMONG WAITERS IN
        FRANCHISE RESTAURANTS. South East Asia Journal of Contemporary Business, Economics and
        Law, Vol. 21, Issue 5 (April) ISSN 2289-1560 2020 126
[32].   Mochamad Soelton, Eko Tama Putra Saratian Anees Janee Ali Tine Yuliantini Dwi Astari. 2020. THE
        IMPLICATION OF EMOTIONAL ENVIRONMENT THAT MAY EFFECT THE EMPLOYEE
        TURNOVER INTENTION. South East Asia Journal of Contemporary Business, Economics and Law,
        Vol. 21, Issue 5 (April) ISSN 2289-1560 2020 108
[33].   Mochamad Soelton, Eko Tama Putra Saratian Anees Janee Ali Sri Anah Immanuel Alfe Andre Yosef.
        2019. IMPLEMENTATION OF ORGANIZATIONAL COMMITMENT IN ENGINEERING AND
        CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRIES. South East Asia Journal of Contemporary Business, Economics
        and Law, Vol. 20, Issue 5 (DEC) ISSN 2289-1560 2019 167
[34].   Mochamad Soelton, Yanto Ramli Anees Janee Ali Harefan Arief, Eko Tama Putra Saratian Eviyanti
        Pasaribu. 2020. TO IMPLY THE ORGANIZATIONAL CITIZENSHIP BEHAVIOR IN THE WORK
        PLACE TO IMPROVE EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE. International Journal of Business, Economics
        and Law, Vol. 21, Issue 5 (April) ISSN 2289-1552 2020 70
[35].   Eko Tama Putra Saratian Mochamad Soelton, Anees Janee Ali Harefan Arief, Lisnatiawati Saragih
        Friska Risfi. 2019. THE IMPLICATION OF WORK LOAD IN THE WORK PLACE THAT MAY
        PROVOKE WORK STRESS. South East Asia Journal of Contemporary Business, Economics and
        Law, Vol. 20, Issue 5 (DEC) ISSN 2289-1560 2019 172
[36].   Mochamad Soelton, Nicko Alexander Visano, Irfan Noviandy Aulia, Mugiono, Tantri Yanuar Rahmat
        Syah Lecturer, Siti Annisa Febriyani. 2020. Work Insecurity Enhances Work Stress and Burnout in
        Indonesian Railway Industry. THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BUSINESS &
        MANAGEMENT. ISSN 2321–8916 www.theijbm.com 232 Vol 8 Issue 4 DOI No.:
        10.24940/theijbm/2020/v8/i4/BM2004-055 April, 2020
[37].   Mochamad Soelton, Nicko Alexander Visano, Irfan Noviandy Aulia, Mugiono, Bayu Hatmo Purwoko,
        Tantri Yanuar Rahmat Syah, Nonni Hastuti. 2020. The Impact of Employee’s Commitment and
        Personality That Influence Their Organizational Citizenship Behavior in Property Industry. THE
        INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BUSINESS & MANAGEMENT. ISSN 2321–8916
        www.theijbm.com 232 Vol 8 Issue 4 DOI No.: 10.24940/theijbm/2020/v8/i4/BM2004-055 April, 2020
[38].   M Soelton, S Himawan, L Fazriyanti, S Ria, I Gustiawan. 2018. Visionary Leadership Structure: Stress
        Levels On Performance In Technology and Communications Industry. Forum Manajemen Indonesia
        10-Palembang. 10 (November 2018), 508
[40].   Y Ramli, M Soelton, Paijan. 2019. The Influence of Innovation Management Toward The Business
        Performance of Garment Industries in Indonesia. International Journal od Business, Economics and
        Law. 16 (Issue 5), 249-258
[41].   M Soelton, F Ahdiansyah. 2018. Toward The Best Model in Recruitment Process and Employee
        Competence in Outsourcing Industries. Jurnal Ekonomi. 23 (Juli 2018), 240-250
[42].   M Soelton, D Yasintha. 2018. Pengaruh Kepemimpinan Transformasional, Lingkungan Kerja Fisik
        dan Stres kerja terhadap Kinerja Pegawai Kantor Kelurahan Kecamatan Penjaringan Jakarta Utara.
        Jurnal Ekonomi. 23 (Maret 2018), 20-32
[43].   M Soelton, R Pratama. 2018. Effect of Recruitment Process, Selection, and Compensation on
        Frontliner Performance in Bank Industry. Proceeding International Conference on Management
        Economics and Business of Universitas Mercu Buana (ICMEB 2018). Jilid 2018. ISBN 978-979-
        99488-3-0
[44].   M Soelton, S Ria, F Arifin. 2018. Effect of Organizational Culture, Job Satisfaction, and Engagement
        on Employee Performance in Government Company. Proceeding International Conference on
        Management Economics and Business of Universitas Mercu Buana (ICMEB 2018). Jilid 2018. ISBN
        978-979-99488-3-0
[45].   Prajuanturi, Mardiki (2017). Pengaruh Kualitas Kehidupan Kerja dan Komitmen Organisasi terhadap
        Kinerja Karyawan di PT Agung Automall Cabang Soekarno Hatta Pekanbaru. JOM Fekon, Vol.4
        No.2, Hal (2252-2263).
[46].   Rene, R., & Wahyuni, S. (2018). Pengaruh work-life balance terhadap komitmen organisasi, kepuasan
        kerja, dan motivasi kerja terhadap kinerja individu pada karyawan perusahaan asuransi di
        jakarta. Jurnal Manajemen dan Bisnis Sriwijaya, 16(1), 53-63.
[47].   Robbins, Stephen P, and Judge, Timothy, A. 2015, Perilaku Organisasi, Edisi 16, Edisi Bahasa
        Indonesia, Terjemahan Ratna Saraswati dan Febriella Sirait. Salemba Empat, Jakarta.
[47].   Sebayang, S., & Sembiring, J. (2017). Pengaruh Self Esteem Dan Self Efficacy Terhadap Kinerja
        Karyawan Studi Kasus Di PP. Finnet Indonesia. eProceedings of Management, 4(1).
[48].   Sidharta, N., & Margaretha, M. (2011). Dampak komitmen organisasi dan kepuasan kerja terhadap
        turnover intention: studi empiris pada karyawan bagian operator di salah satu perusahaan garment di
        Cimahi. Jurnal Manajemen, 10(2), 129-142.
[49].   Soelton, M., Nugrahati, T., Setiawan, M., Rochman, F., & Pratama, A. (2019). Gender: Stress Levels
        on Performance in Modern Industry. Archives of Business Research, 7 (2), 72-81, DOI:
        10.14738/abr.72.6131.
[50].   Soelton, M., Umar, M. (2018). Recognizing How The Time Demands of Work Influences the Turn
        Over Intention in Banking Industry. European Journal of Business and Management (EJBM), 12 (19).
[51].   Soelton, M. (2018). How Culture, Training Standard and Discipline on the Employee Performance
        Affect Hotel Management. European Research Studies Journal, 21(4), 378-385.
[52].   Soelton, M., & Nugrahati, T. (2018). How Complaining Behaviors Effect on Coping Stress and
        Anxiety. International Journal of Saudi Journal of Business and Management Studies (SJBMS), 3(6),
        623-628.
[53].   Soelton, M., & Oktapriatna, N. (2018). How Complaining Behaviors Effect on Performance in
        Government Industries?. International Journal of Saudi Journal of Business and Management Studies
        (SJBMS), 3(6), 623-628.
[54].   Soelton, M., & Rakasidhi, J. (2018). How to Implementation Organization Citizenship Behaviors with
        performance on Accident insurance service. European Journal of Business and Management
        (EJBM), 10(15), 10-16.
[55].   Soelton, M., Pebriani, P., Umar, M., Triwulan, J., & Wilantara, J. How transformational leadership,
        communication, and workload on the employee performance affect shoes industries. South East Asia
        Journal of Contemporary Business, Economics and Law, Vol. 17, Issue 5(December) ISSN 2289-1560.
[56].   Soelton, M., & Atnani, M. (2018). How Work Environment, Work Satisfaction, Work Stress On The
        Turnover Intention Affect University Management. Jurnal Manajemen dan Bisnis Indonesia, 5(3), 439-
        448.
[57].   Wibowo. (2017). Perilaku dalam Organisasi. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.
[58].   Wirawan. (2015). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia Indonesia : Teori, Psikologi, Hukum,
        Ketenagakerjaan, Aplikasi dan Penulisan : Aplikasi dalam Organisasi Bisnis, Pemerintahan dan
        Pendidikan. PT. RAJAGRAFINDO PERSADA. Jakarta.