Scribd
Upload
154 views1 page

Presentation Evaluation Guide

This evaluation form is used to assess oral presentations. It evaluates the content, organization, and delivery of a presentation. The content section considers the clarity, quality, originality and significance of the presented material. The organization section examines the use of media, transitions, flow, and summary. Delivery is assessed based on engagement, voice, language, and response to questions. Ratings are provided on a scale of 1 to 5 for each criterion, with total scores calculated for content, organization, delivery, overall impression, and a grand total. Space for comments is also included.

Uploaded by

Marlowe Sarabia
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
154 views1 page

Presentation Evaluation Guide

This evaluation form is used to assess oral presentations. It evaluates the content, organization, and delivery of a presentation. The content section considers the clarity, quality, originality and significance of the presented material. The organization section examines the use of media, transitions, flow, and summary. Delivery is assessed based on engagement, voice, language, and response to questions. Ratings are provided on a scale of 1 to 5 for each criterion, with total scores calculated for content, organization, delivery, overall impression, and a grand total. Space for comments is also included.

Uploaded by

Marlowe Sarabia
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

ORAL PRESENTATION EVALUATION FORM

Name of Presenter/s: ________________________________________________ Date: ____________________


Topic: _____________________________________________________________________________________

Please mark the score for each evaluation criterion below. When you are finished, combine the total points at the
bottom for the overall score.

Poor Fair Average Good Excellent


Content
Clarity of content 1 2 3 4 5
Quality of content (background, methodology, findings, etc.) 1 2 3 4 5
Originality and complexity of project 1 2 3 4 5
1 2 3 4 5
Significance of project (to field of study, community, etc.) 1 2 3 4 5
Support main points
Comments on Content:
Content Points = / 25

Organization
Appropriate use of media 1 2 3 4 5
Smooth transitions between topics 1 2 3 4 5
Logical flow of sections/ideas 1 2 3 4 5
1 2 3 4 5
Clear thesis and supporting data 1 2 3 4 5
Informative and clear project summary
Comments on Organization:
Organization Points = / 25

Delivery
Professional and confident 1 2 3 4 5
Engaged with audience 1 2 3 4 5
Clear voice with good pace 1 2 3 4 5
1 2 3 4 5
Command of language/avoiding jargon 1 2 3 4 5
Response to questions
Comments on Delivery:
Delivery Points = / 25

Overall Impression/Quality 1 2 3 4 5

Overall Impression Points = /5

Comments (may use back of paper as well) TOTAL SCORE = / 80


What were the strengths of this presentation?

Do you have any suggestions for improvement?

You might also like