365 Full
365 Full
   The identification of two types of infectious hepatitis            epidemiologïcal, and immunological types of infec¬
with distinctive clinical, epidemiological, and immunolog-            tious hepatitis.
ical features provided an explanation for the occurrence                The nature of the endemic situation at the Wil-
of second attacks of the disease. One type resembled                  lowbrook State School has been described in detail
classical infectious hepatitis (IH); it was characterized             in previous reports.1'3 Briefly, infectious hepatitis
by an incubation period of 30 to 38 days, a relatively                was first noticed among Willowbrook patients as
short period of abnormal serum transaminase activity                  early as 1949. From 1949 to 1963 the patient popu¬
(3 to 19 days), a consistently abnormal thymol turbidity,             lation increased from a mere 200 to over 6,000. As
and a high degree of contagion. The other type resembled              the population increased and new susceptible chil¬
serum hepatitis (SH); it was characterized by a longer                dren were admitted, hepatitis found a continuous
incubation period (41 to 108 days), a longer period of                foothold. Attempts to relieve overcrowding have now
abnormal transaminase activity (35 to 200 days) and a                 reduced this population to approximately 5,400
relatively normal thymol turbidity. Contrary to commonly               mentally retarded patients, predominantly children,
accepted concepts, the SH type was moderately conta-                   who are distributed among 24 buildings. The con¬
gious. Patients with IH type were later proved to be                   stant admission of many susceptible children and the
immune to the same type. Patients with the SH type were                natural transmission of the disease via the intes¬
not immune to the IH type infection.
                                                                       tinal-oral route have been responsible for the con¬
                                                                       tinuing endemic situation. Many of the patients are
InfectioIsland,
Staten
         us hepatitis
                NY,
                       has been recognized as an en¬
     demic disease at the Willowbrook State School,
                      since 1953. As a result of this
                                                                                For editorial   comment   see   page 406.
endemic environment, 1,153 cases of infectious hepa¬
titis with jaundice were observed to have been trans¬                  incapable of being toilet trained and prone to put
mitted by natural contact in this institution during                   everything that they pick up into their mouths. This
                                                                      intensifies the problem of control. Under the chronic
the past 12 years. Second attacks with jaundice                       circumstance of multiple and repeated natural ex¬
have occurred in 63 patients or 5.5% of this group.                   posure, it has been shown that most newly admitted
In most instances the second attack of jaundice oc¬                   children become infected within the first 6 to 12
curred within one year but occasionally as late as                    months of residence in the institution.
four and seven years after the first attack. One pos¬                     Prior experience indicated that y-globulin did not
sible explanation for second attacks would be the
existence of multiple types of infectious hepatitis                   prevent hepatitis infection; it attenuated the dis¬
                                                                      ease. Eleven separate dosage trials with y-globulin
virus, immunologically separate and distinct. Ex¬                     have been undertaken since 1956 in an attempt to
amples of this phenomenon have been observed in                       reduce the number of clinical cases of infectious
enterovirus, adenovirus, and myxovirus infections.                    hepatitis in the institution. The direct measurable
The studies reported in this communication provide                    result of these programs was a reduction of ap¬
evidence for the presence of two distinctive clinical,
                                                                      proximately 85% of icteric hepatitis among patients
  From the Department of Pediatrics, New York University              and employees at Willowbrook. With the realiza¬
School of Medicine, New York (Drs. Krugman and Giles), and            tion that subclinical cases persisted and were con¬
Willowbrook State School, Staten Island, NY (Dr. Hammond).
Dr. Giles is recipient of the New York City Health Research           tagious, elimination of the disease could not be
Council Career Scientist award.
  Read in part before the Pan American Health Organization\x=req-\
                                                                      accomplished. In the absence of an effective vaccine,
World Health Organization International Conference on Vaccines        the study on the natural history of infectious hepa¬
Against Viral and Rickettsial Diseases of Man, Washington, DC,        titis in this institution was therefore considered an
Nov 11, 1966, and before the 77th annual meeting of the Amer-
ican Pediatric Society. Atlantic City, NJ, April 27. 1967.            important step toward better understanding and
  Reprint requests to 550 First Ave, New York 10016 (Dr. Krug-        future control of this infection. The benefits of such
man).                                                                 a program to the entire institution were obvious. It
Willowbrook serum pool No. 5 (WSP-5) was used 0 ANICTERIC HEPATITIS O N0 APPARENT DISEASE
 for the first trial. It was prepared from specimens           1. First trial, occurrence of first attack of hepatitis after
obtained three to seven days before onset of jaun¬             subjects were fed Willowbrook serum pool No. 5
                                                               (WSP-5). Second trial, occurrence of second attacks of
dice in 27 Willowbrook study patients. On Sept. 23,            hepatitis in same subjects following inoculation of
1964, WSP-5 was fed to 11 of 13 newly admitted                 WSP-5 six months later. First number indicates first
                                                               day SGOT exceeded 100 units/ml; second number,
subjects in a dose of 1.0 ml. Two children served as           first day SGOT declined to levels below 109 units; num¬
controls. All subjects were intimately exposed to              bers in parentheses, peak SGOT levels.
each other but were isolated from other Willow¬
brook patients.                                           in most  patients during the first trial; it was much
   Results.—As indicated in Fig 1, oral administra¬       longer (17 to 64 days) during the second trial. These
tion of WSP-5 was followed by hepatitis in ten of 11      findings suggested the possibility that the two at¬
subjects. The incubation periods ranged between           tacks of hepatitis were caused by two different
30 and 36 days in six children, and between 51 and        viruses.
58 days in three; in one child evidence of hepatitis         During the course of the first two trials, serial
was first detectable on the 125th day. Patient Mac        samples of serum were obtained before and after
had a spontaneous second attack of hepatitis on the       onset of first and second attacks of hepatitis in indi¬
97th day, 67 days after onset of the first attack.        vidual subjects. This material was stored in the deep
At least one of the two unfed controls may have had       freeze at —20 C. Serum specimens from subject
possible anicteric hepatitis. Jaundice was observed       Mir were selected for special study. It was postu-
in six of ten subjects with hepatitis.
                                                                          WILLOWBROOK SERUM POOL No.5-l.OML ORALLY ON 9/23/64
                    Second Trial
                                                                       -{-
    The second trial was undertaken to study the          m              ATTACK                            MIR.B FIRST
problem of second attacks of hepatitis. On March                       I   J-l TOJ-6 DAY SERUM IMS-l)0.l-0.2 ML    Ü                             CONTROL GROUP
                                                                                                                                                            jp                i
 26, 1965, WSP-5 was given to ten of 13 subjects                     H        ö ói Ó â ÈÔ                                              ÈÉÈÈ
who had participated in the first trial six months                   31-40 34-53 37-40 37-46 38-4946-60 53-63                         46-49 60-70 66-78 70-81 70-78 85-91+
                                                                 (1280) (3401 (2701 (560) (5601(1380) (840)                            (156) (1240) (240) (1880) (640) (420)
previously. The dose was 0.25 ml intramuscularly.                    CLA      JEN SHER MCD         WJO   PAR   AXE SHE                 POR       HOR MAR WJA           RAM   ALL
Three additional subjects were uninoculated con¬
                                                               WILLOWBROOK SERUM POOL No. 5-0.25 ML INTRAMUSCULARLY ON 3/26/65
trols. All 13 subjects were isolated from other Wil¬
lowbrook patients from the beginning of the first                                                                  ï
                                                          m                                                MIR.B SECOND            ATTACK
trial until the termination of the second trial.
   Results.—As indicated in Fig 1, hepatitis was ob¬                  I         J-5DAY SERUM(M5-2)0,25MLI.M.                   I            |       CONTROL GROUP             I
served in six of ten subjects who were inoculated
with WSP-5. The incubation periods ranged be¬
                                                          í\         b       à à \h à à äöo
                                                                 41-162 45-246 50-113 55-146 59162 59-181 69-104
                                                                 (440) (1500) (680) (270) (4201 (620) (1380)
                                                                                                                                                 ààóó
                                                                                                                                                155-215 231-265
                                                                                                                                                (220) (950)
                                                                                                                                                                             o
tween 38 and 102 days. The occurrence of hepatitis               PEL         HAM    CER CIL        BIS   RHO LAW NE* SUT                         CEN MED          GOM RUM TOR
in four subjects (Sch, Mas, Wac, and Mir) repre¬
sented second attacks.
   As indicated in Fig 1, the following differences
                                                               ^-HEPATITIS WITH          JAUNDICE        Q-ANICTERIC HEPATITIS                  O"N0 »PWENT DISEASE
were apparent when the results of the first two trials         2. Third trial,  occurrence of hepatitis in subjects who
                                                               received serum (MS-1) obtained from patient Mir during
were compared: (1) During the first attack of hepa¬            first trial. Note onset of hepatitis after relatively short
titis in four subjects (Sch, Mas, Wac, and Mir) the            incubation period: relatively short period of abnormal
incubation period ranged between 35 and 51 days; it            transaminase activity; and high attack rate in control
                                                               group. Fourth trial, occurrence of hepatitis in subjects
was longer during the second attack, ranging be¬               who received serum (MS-2) from patient Mir during
tween 66 and 82 days. (2) Duration of abnormal                 second trial. Note longer incubation pericd, longer
SGOT activity was relatively short (5 to 17 days)              period of abnormal transaminase activity, and contact
                                                               infection in two of five control subjects.
ly before the second attack were designated MS-2                                                All 14 children were intimately exposed to each
and were used for the fourth trial.                                                             other during the course of the trial.
                                                                                                    Results.—As indicated in Fig 2 and Table 2, hepa¬
                    Third Trial                                                                 titis was observed in seven of nine subjects who
   Fourteen newly  admitted subjects participated in                                            were inoculated with MS-2 serum. The incubation
the third trial. On Nov 22, 1965, a pool of MS-1                                                periods ranged between 41 and 69 days. Jaundice
                            Table 1.—Serial Liver Function Tests in Seven Children Infected With MS-1                                   Hepatitis   Serum
                          CLA                            JEN                     SHER                   MCD                W JO                    PAR                 AXE
  Day
  After  r
Exposure          TT"           SGOTt                          SGOT                  SGOT        TT           SGOT             SGOT                      SGOT                SGOT
                                                                                                                                 16                       26    2.5           26
     0            4             _34_             2.5           _14__                   19       <1.2            21   <1.2                   j4.0_                             27
                                                 1.2             20                    28       <lZ-            20   <\.2        16          1.8          27
    10            2.7             27                                      _32_                                                                            21
    16                          _28                                        4.2_        42        3.5            18   <1.2        21                              2.1          27_
                                                                                                                                                                              22
                                                                                       42        2.1            42     1.8         26        2.7          20
    22             2.7          _20           57_               27         8.7
                                                                                                                                                          16
                                                                 50        7.5         27        J.2_           16     2.1         18                            7.5
    28             6.2            84_       _<1.2_
                                            _
                                                                                       20         5.7           21     1.8         12                     21                  16
    31_            6.5          1,280
                                _           _2.1_              _40_        4.5
    34                                           8              310
                                                                          13.7                    3.2          24      2.1         14        4.2          10     6.5          20
    35            12.5              120     _
                                                12.5 _
                                                                160                       24_                                                             17
    37            11.2              170         15.5            340        6.2          _?70_     2.1         170      1.2     _86_          2.1
                                                                                                                                                          40                  14
    40"           12.5^              56         25_             138^       7.5          _84_    _7JL5_        180                 560        4.2
                                                                                                                                                          22     4.5          19
    42            10               39_          25_            J40         ñ.2_          40      14.8         J60      7.5        420
                                                                                                                                                                 1.2          20
                   6.5                          22               91       10             34_    21              75     6.7     J14                       128
    46                           _48_                                      7.7           "27     18             84     5.5         51                    750                  21
    49             6.2               29         27              126
    51_                                                                                                                                             J,380^
    52                                                                                                                                       7.5    _940^
                                                                                                                39                 56        9.2         740    11           840
   153_
    55
                                                21              64         8.5           50      17^
                                                                                                 13             48
                                                                                                                      13.4
                                                                                                                                            13           600
    56                              49          22.2             34        8.5           41                           11.7         46       11           480    16           560
    58                                                                                                                                                          15            138_
   L60_                              21_        17.5             44        8.7            35     10.5^          20    11.2         44        9.5          60    22           _106_
    63             7                42          16.4             57       11              13     11.5           42     8.7         18       13            34    16.5          49
                  Table 2.—Serial Liver Function Tests in Seven Children Infected With MS-2   Hepatitis Serum
                                                                    CIL             BIS              RHO        LAW
  189
  "Thymol turbidity, units.
  ¡Serum glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase, units/ml.
            £ S 5 5 S i
           64-70
           (180)
                                 96-133
                                 (440)
                                                      117-161
                                                      (490)
                                                                      133-161+
                                                                       (840)
                                                                                      209-222+
                                                                                         1360)
                                                                                                                    types of infectious hepatitis with distinctive clini¬
                                                                                                                    cal and epidemiological features. The seventh trial
                                                                                                                    was designed to study the immunological aspects
            WOO                   CAS                 VEL               KAR               WIL               KET     of the disease following MS-1 type infection (third
                                                                                                                    trial) and MS-2 type infection (fourth trial).
            "MS-2"SERUM FR0M"HAM"AND"PEL"0.5ML ORALLY-NO GAMMA GLOBULIN                                                                                     Seventh Trial
                                                                                                                       The sixteen subjects who participated in the
            ¿r "ir "h it "ir
          88-115
           (740)
                                 95-157
                                 11320)
                                                     104-167
                                                      (980)
                                                                      104-115
                                                                       (140)
                                                                                       108-179
                                                                                        (1260)
                                                                                                           o        seventh trial included eight children from the
                                                                                                                    third trial and eight children from the fourth trial.
                                                                                                                    The entire group was isolated from other institu¬
            LOP                   LEN                 HAR               SEO               OAV              DEA
                                                                                                                    tional patients during the entire period of the study.
                                              [«"I   ANICTERIC HEPATITIS                                            On March 28, 1966, four months after the third
                                                                                                                    trial and seven months after the fourth trial, all
     4. Fifth and sixth trials, oral administration of MS-2
     serum followed by anicteric hepatitis in ten of 12 sub¬                                                        16 subjects were inoculated with infectious hepa¬
     jects after long incubation periods. First number indi¬                                                        titis serum, MS-1 type; the dose was 0.2 ml. intra¬
     cates first day that SGOT exceeded 100 units/ml; sec¬
     ond number, first day the SGOT declined to levels below                                                        muscularly.
      100 units; numbers in parentheses, peak SGOT levels.                                                             Results.—Evidence for homologous immunity fol¬
                                                                                                                    lowing MS-1 infection    is presented in Fig 5. The
six presumably susceptible subjects. The incubation                                                                 initial inoculation of MS-1 serum on Nov 22, 1965,
periods ranged between 64 and 209 days. The dura¬                                                                   had been followed by infectious hepatitis in seven
tion of abnormal SGOT activity was prolonged and                                                                    of eight subjects; the pattern of serum transaminase
the thymol turbidity response was normal in three                                                                   and thymol turbidity activity was typical of MS-1
of five subjects with hepatitis. All children were                                                                  infection. Subsequent challenge with infectious MS-
clinically normal. They were asymptomatic and                                                                       1 serum on March 28, 1966, revealed no evidence
they gained weight. Hepatitis was not observed in                                                                   of hepatitis with or without jaundice; all eight sub¬
the three children who                                     were     unfed controls.                                 jects were immune.
                                                                                                                       Lack of heterologous immunity    in subjects first
                                                 Sixth Trial                                                        infected with MS-2 virus is shown in Fig 6. The
   The fifth trial indicated that infectious hepatitis                                                              initial inoculation of MS-2 serum on Aug 24, 1965,
virus MS-2 type was infective by mouth. It was                                                                      was followed by infectious hepatitis in six of eight
considered important to confirm this observation.                                                                   subjects; the pattern of transaminase and thymol
Accordingly, on May 27, 1966, MS-2 type serum                                                                       turbidity activity was typical of MS-2 infection.
from subjects Ham and Pel was given to six pre¬                                                                     Subsequent challenge with infectious MS-1 serum
sumably susceptible newly admitted subjects; the                                                                    on March 28, 1966, was followed by hepatitis in all
dose was 0.5 ml by mouth. Gamma globulin was                                                                        eight subjects. The pattern of the SGOT and thymol
not administered.                                                                                                   turbidity response in this second attack was char¬
   Results.—As indicated in Fig 4, the results of the                                                               acteristic for MS-1 type of infection. Thus, inocu¬
sixth trial were similar to the fifth trial. Anicteric                                                              lation of MS-1 serum was followed by hepatitis in
asymptomatic hepatitis was observed in five of six                                                                  five of six subjects who had a previous infection
subjects after prolonged incubation periods rang¬                                                                   caused by MS-2 serum (Fig 6). In contrast, the
ing between 88 and 108 days. The SGOT activity                                                                      same MS-1 serum produced no evidence of infec¬
was prolonged and the thymol turbidity response                                                                     tion in seven subjects who had a previous attack
      RESULTS OF IH0CUHTI0N WITH MS-1 SEBUM 111/22/651             RESULTS OF CHALLENGE WITH MS-1 SERUM 13/28/66)         RESULTS OF IH0CULATI0N WITH MS-2 SERUMI8/24/65I    RESULTS OF CHALLEH6E WITH MS-1 SERU»(3/28/66)
                    ABNORMAL SHOT ftCTIVITT                                                                                   r,pE ABNORMAL SGOT ACTIVITY   PEJK THYMOL             TYPE      ABNORMAL SGOT ACTIVITY PEiK IHru0L
          TÏPE                                 PEJ, r„YB0L                                                                      OF    PEAK LEVEL DURATION     TURBIDITY              OF        PEAK LEVEL DURATION    TURBIDITY
           OF        PEAK LEVEL DURATION       TURBIDITY                                                            SUBJECT HEPATITIS UNITS/ML     DAYS      UNITS/ML             HEPATITIS     UNITS/ML     DAYS     UNITS/ML
SUBJECT HEPATITIS     UNITS/ML      DAYS       UNITS/ML                       TYPE OF HEPATITIS
      5. Evidence for homologous                                 immunity following MS-1                                  6. Evidence for lack of                    heterologous immunity follow¬
      hepatitis infection.                                                                                                ing MS-2 hepatitis infection.
                                                                  References
  1. Ward, R., et al: Infectious Hepatitis: Studies of Its Natural          11. Neefe, J.R.; Gellis, S.S.; and Stokes, J., Jr.: Homologous
History and Prevention, New Eng J Med 258: 407-416 (Feb 27)              Serum Hepatitis and Infectious (Epidemic) Hepatitis: Studies in
 1958.                                                                   Volunteers Bearing on Immunological and Other Characteristics
   2. Krugman, S., et al: Infectious Hepatitis: Detection of Virus       of Etiological Agents, Amer J Med 1:3-22 (July) 1946.
During the Incubation Period and in Clinically Inapparent In-               12. MacCallum, F.O., and Bauer, D.J.: Homologous Serum
 fection, New Eng J Med 261:729-734 (Oct 8) 1959.                        Jaundice: Transmission Experiments With Human Volunteers,
   3. Krugman, S.; Ward, R.; and Giles, J.P.: The Natural History        Lancet 1:622-627 (May 13) 1944.
of Infectious Hepatitis, Amer J Med 32:717-728 (May) 1962.                  13. Neefe, J.R.: Recent Advances in Knowledge of "Virus Hep-
   4. World Medical Association Draft Code of Ethics on Human            atitis" Med Clin N Amer 30:1407-1443 (Nov) 1946.
Experimentation, Brit MJ 2:1119 (Oct 27) 1962.                              14. Green, P.: Some Serochemical Differences Between Homol-
   5. Malloy, H.T., and Evelyn, K.A.: Determination of Bilirubin         ogous Serum Hepatitis and Infectious Hepatitis, Canad Med As-
With Photoelectric Colorimeter, J Biol Chem 119:481-490 (July)           soc 63:365-368 (Oct) 1950.
1937.                                                                       15. MacCallum, F.O.: Transmission of Arsenotherapy Jaun-
   6. Maclagan, N.F.: Thymol Turbidity Test: New Indicator of            dice by Blood: Failure With Faeces and Nasopharyngeal Wash-
Liver Dysfunction, Brit J Exper Path 25:234-241 (Dec) 1944.              ings, Lancet 1:342 (March 17) 1945.
   7. Karmen, A.: Note on Spectrophotometric Assay of Glutamic\x=req-\      16. Findley, G.M., and Martin, N.H.: Jaundice Following
Oxalacetic Transaminase in Human Blood Serum, J Clin Invest              Yellow Fever Immunization, Lancet 1:678-680 (May 29) 1943.
34:126-133 (Jan) 1955.                                                      17. Freeman, G.: Epidemiology and Incubation Period of
   8. MacCallum, F.O., and Bradley, W.H.: Transmission of In-            Jaundice Following Yellow Fever Vaccination, Amer J Trop Med
fective Hepatitis to Human Volunteers: Effect on Rheumatoid              26:15-32 (Jan) 1946.
Arthritis, Lancet 2:228 (Aug 12) 1944.                                      18. Mirick, G.S., and Shank, R.E.: An Epidemic of Serum Hep-
   9. Paul, J.R., et al: Transmission Experiments in Serum Jaun-         atitis Studies Under Controlled Conditions, Trans Amer Clin
dice and Infectious, Hepatitis, JAMA 128:911-915 (July 28) 1945.         Climat Assoc 71:176-190, 1959.
   10. Havens, W.P., Jr.: Period of Infectivity of Patients With            19. Havens, W.P., Jr.: Experiment in Cross Immunity Between
Experimentally Induced Infectious Hepatitis, J Exp Med 83:251\x=req-\    Infectious Hepatitis and Homologous Serum Jaundice, Proc Soc
258 (March) 1946.                                                        Exp Biol Med 59:148-150 (June) 1945.
                                                     It takes little
                                                                linguistic sophistication to be ready with
                                                 a spontaneous verdict on whether a particular English
                                                 word is of Romance or Teutonic origin. The verdict may
                                           be wrong, but generally it is ready—spontaneously so. On
                                           the other hand, whether a Latin word reached us by way
                                           of French or directly is a matter on which we feel obliged
                   to consult a dictionary, except when its sojourn in French has left unmistakable
                   marks on its spelling and its pronunciation or both. That this latter matter, which
                   by rights ought to concern only the abstrusely learned, should have a bearing on
                   our spelling is most unfortunate. It does though.
                      Our suffixes "-nt" ("-nee") and "-ble" ("-bility") are preceded by "-a-" or
                   "-e-" and "-a-" or "-i-" reflecting a Latin pattern in which verbs in -are formed
                   -ant- and -abil- while verbs from other classes formed -ent- and -ibil-. Our pro¬
                   nunciation does not differentiate between the forms in -a- and those in -e- or -i-,
                   and in deciding which spelling to use in a given word we rely (to put it some¬
                   what mystically) on our awareness of Latin as Latin is alive in English.
                      This would be fine if there were not things like "resistant" (with "-a-") but
                   "resistible" (with "-i-"), while "existent" and "existible" (if we want such a
                   thing) do follow the pattern. Here is an English irregularity which hits no En¬
                   glish cause, only a French one, for French differentiates in pronunciation (and
                   spelling) between -ible and -able, but neither in pronunciation nor in spelling
                    (with some exceptions that have no bearing on our problem) between -ant and
                    -ent.
                      I can spell "existent" because I know English and am aware of the Latinity
                   that is alive in English. I can spell "resistant" because I know French or (since
                   that is no consistent guide) because I have learned it by rote. Actually, when I
                   am tired I can't spell it. When I am tired I have to look up "defendant" and "as¬
                   sistant" (but "consistent") and "ascendent" and "ascendant".                  .   .   .