Commercial Law - Negotiable Instruments Law
Commercial Law - Negotiable Instruments Law
1. Negotiable Instruments – written contracts for the payment of money; by its form, intended as a
substitute for money and intended to pass from hand to hand, to give the holder in due course the right
to hold the same and collect the sum due.
2. Characteristics of Negotiable Instruments:
a. negotiability – right of transferee to hold the instrument and collect the sum due
Holder in due course may have better rights transferee acquires rights only of his
than transferor transferor
Prior parties warrant payment prior parties merely warrant legality of title
Have requisites of Sec. 1 of the NIL does not contain requisites of Sec. 1 of NIL
Holder in due course may have rights better than transferee merely steps into the shoes of the
transferor transferor
5. Promissory Note – unconditional promise to pay in writing made by one person to another, signed
by the maker, engaging to pay on demand or a fixed determinable future time a sum certain in money to
order or bearer. When the note is drawn to maker’s own order, it is not complete until indorse by him.
(Sec. 184 NIL)
Parties:
1. maker
2. payee
6. Bill of Exchange – unconditional order in writing addressed by one person to another, signed by
the person giving it, requiring the person to whom it is addressed to pay on demand or at a fixed or
determinable future time a sum certain in money to order or to bearer. (Sec. 126 NIL)
Parties:
1. drawer
2. payee
3. drawee/ acceptor
7. Check – bill of exchange drawn on a bank and payable on demand. (Sec. 185 NIL)
8. Difference between Promissory Note and Bill of Exchange
CHECK BOE
– always drawn upon a bank or banker – may or may not be drawn against a bank
– must be presented for payment within a – may be presented for payment within a
reasonable time after its issue (6 months) reasonable time after its last negotiation.
10. Distinctions between a Promissory Note and Check
PN CHECK
– there are two (2) parties, the maker and – there are three (3) parties, the drawer, the
the payee drawee bank and the payee
12. Trust Receipt – a security transaction intended to aid in the financing of importers and retailers
who do not have sufficient funds to finance their transaction and acquire credit except to use as
collateral the merchandise imported
13. Requisites of a Negotiable Note (PN): (SUDO)
It must:
It must:
– In order to be negotiable, there must be a writing of some kind, else there would be nothing to
be negotiated or passed from hand to hand. The writing may be in ink, print or pencil. It may be upon
parchment, cloth, leather or any other substitute of paper.
– It must be signed by the maker or drawer. It may consist of mere initials or even numbers, but the
holder must prove that what is written is intended as a signature of the person sought to be charged.
– The Bill must contain an order, something more than the mere asking of a favor.
– Sum payable must be in money only. It cannot be made payable in goods, wares, or merchandise
or in property.
*In determining is the instrument is negotiable, only the instrument itself and no other, must be
examined and compared with the requirements stated in Sec. 1. If it appears on the instrument that it
lacks one of the requirements, it is not negotiable and the provisions of the NIL do not govern the
instrument. The requirement lacking cannot be supplied by using a separate instrument in which that
requirement which is lacking appears.
17. General Rule: The promise or order should not depend on a contingent event. If it is conditional, it
is non-negotiable.
Exceptions:
a. indication of particular fund from which the acceptor disburses himself after payment
b. statement of the transaction which gives rise to the instrument. (Sec. 3 NIL)
But an order or promise to pay out of a particular fund is not unconditional
Notes on Section 3
– The particular fund indicated should not be the direct source of payment, else it becomes
unconditional and therefore non-negotiable. The fund should only be the source of reimbursement.
– A statement of the transaction does not destroy the negotiability of the instrument. Exception:
Where the promise to pay or order is made subject to the terms and conditions of the transaction
stated.
c. on or at a fixed date after the occurrence of an event certain to happen though the exact date is
not certain (Sec. 4 NIL)
Notes on Section 4
– If the instrument is payable upon a contingency, the happening of the event does not cure the
defect (still non-negotiable)
19. General Rule: If some other act is required other than the payment of money, it is non-
negotiable.
Exceptions:
d. gives option to the holder to require something to be done in lieu of money (Sec. 5 NIL)
Notes of Section 5
– There are two kinds of judgements by confession: a) cognovit actionem b) relicta verificatione
– Confessions of judgement in the Philippines are void as against public policy.
– If the choice lies with the debtor, the instrument is rendered non-negotiable.
20. The validity and negotiability of an instrument is not affected by the fact that:
1. it is not dated
2. does not specify the value given or that any had been given
3. does not specify the place where it is drawn or payable
4. bears a seal
5. designates the kind of current money in which payment is to be made (Sec. 6 NIL)
Where an instrument is issued, accepted or indorsed when overdue, it is, as regards to the person so
issuing, accepting, or indorsing it, payable on demand.
Notes on Section 7
– if the time for payment is left blank (as opposed to being omitted), it may properly be considered as an
incomplete instrument and fall under the provisions of Sec. 14, 15, or 16 depending on how the
instrument is delivered.
– The payee must be named or otherwise indicated therein with reasonable certainty.
– If there is no payee, there would be no one to indorse the instrument payable to order. Therefore
useless to be considered negotiable.
– Joint payees in indicated by the conjunction “and”. To negotiate, all must indorse.
c. payable to order of fictitious or non-existent person and this fact was known to drawer
Notes on Section 9
– “fictitious person” is not limited to persons having no legal existence. An existing person may be
considered fictitious depending on the intention of the maker or the drawer.
– “fictitious person” means a person who has no right to the instrument because the maker or
drawer of it so intended. He was not intended to be the payee.
– where the instrument is drawn, made or prepared by an agent, the knowledge or intent of the
signer of the instrument is controlling.
– Where the agent has no authority to execute the instrument, the intent of the principal is
controlling
Effects:
– any holder may insert the true date of issuance or acceptance
– the insertion of a wrong date does not avoid the instrument in the hands of a subsequent holder
in due course
– as to the holder in due course, the date inserted (even if it be the wrong date) is regarded as the
true date.
25. Subsequent Holder in Due Course not affected by the following deficiencies:
c. complete and delivered issued without consideration or a consideration consisting of a promise
which was not fulfilled (Sec 28 NIL)
b. It must be filled up strictly in accordance with the authority given and within a reasonable time.
c. If negotiated to a holder in due course, it is valid and effectual for all purpose as though it was
filled up strictly in accordance with the authority given and within reasonable time. (Sec. 14 NIL)
1. It was delivered by the person making it in order that it may be converted into a negotiable
instrument
2. The holder has prima facie authority to fill it up as such for any amount. (Sec. 14 NIL)
Notes on Section 14
– if the instrument is wanting in material particular, mere possession of the instrument is enough
to presume prima facie authority to fill it up.
– material particular may be an omission which will render the instrument non-negotiable (e.g.
name of payee), an omission which will not render the instrument non-negotiable (e.g. date)
– in the case of the signature in blank, delivery with intent to convert it into a negotiable
instrument is required. Mere possession is not enough.
Notes on Section 15
General Rule: Every contract on a negotiable instrument is incomplete and revocable until delivery for
the purpose of giving effect thereto.
a. If between immediate parties and remote parties not holder in due course, to be effectual there
must be authorized delivery by the party making, drawing, accepting or indorsing. Delivery may be
shown to be conditional or for a special purpose only
b. If the holder is a holder in due course, all prior deliveries conclusively presumed valid
c. If instrument not in hands of drawer/maker, valid and intentional delivery is presumed until the
contrary is proven (Sec. 16 NIL)
2) as between immediate parties or those is like cases, delivery must be with intention of passing title
3) an instrument signed but not completed by the drawer or maker and retained by him is invalid as to
him for want of delivery even in the hands of a holder in due course
4) but there is prima facie presumption of delivery of an instrument signed but not completed by the
drawer or maker and retained by him if it is in the hands of a holder in due course. This may be rebutted
by proof of non-delivery.
5) an instrument entrusted to another who wrongfully completes it and negotiates it to a holder in due
course, delivery to the agent or custodian is sufficient delivery to bind the maker or drawer.
6) If an instrument is completed and is found in the possession of another, there is prima facie
evidence of delivery and if it be a holder in due course, there is conclusive presumption of delivery.
7) delivery may be conditional or for a special purpose but such do not affect the rights of a holder in
due course.
30. General rule: a person whose signature does not appear on the instrument in not liable.
Exception:
31. General rule: an agent is not liable on the instrument if he were duly authorized to sign for or on
behalf of a principal.
Requisites:
– if an agent does not disclose his principal, the agent is personally liable on the instrument.
32. Per Procuration – operates as notice that the agent has a limited authority to sign.
Effects:
– the principal in only bound if the agent acted within the limits of the authority given
– the person who takes the instrument is bound to inquire into the extent and nature of the
authority given. (Sec. 21 NIL)
33. General rule: Infants and corporations incur no liability by their indorsement or assignment of an
instrument. (Sec. 22 NIL)
Effects:
– the instrument is still valid and the indorsee acquires title
34. General rule: a signature which is forged or made without authority is wholly inoperative.
Effects:
1. no right to retain
2. no right to give a discharge
3. no right to enforce payment can be acquired. (Sec. 23 NIL)
Exception:
– the party against whom it is sought to be enforced is precluded from setting up the forgery or
want of authority.
Notes on Section 23
– Section 23 applies only to forged signatures or signatures made without authority
– Forms of forgery are a) fraud in factum b) duress amounting to fraud c) fraudulent impersonation
– Only the signature forged or made without authority is inoperative, the instrument or other
signatures which are genuine are affected
– The instrument can be enforced by holders to whose title the forged signature is not necessary
– Persons who are precluded from setting up the forgery are a) those who warrant or admit the
genuineness of the signature b) those who are estopped.
– Persons who are precluded by warranting are a) indorsers b) persons negotiating by delivery c)
acceptors.
– drawee bank is conclusively presumed to know the signature of its drawer
– if endorser’s signature is forged, loss will be borne by the forger and parties subsequent thereto
– drawee bank is not conclusively presumed to know the signature of the indorser. The
responsibility falls on the bank which last guaranteed the indorsement and not the drawee bank.
– Where the payee’s signature is forged, payments made by the drawee bank to collecting bank is
ineffective. No debtor/creditor relationship is created. An agency to collect is created between the
person depositing and the collecting bank. Drawee bank may recover from collecting bank who may in
turn recover from the person depositing.
– a party whose endorsement is forged on a note payable to order and all parties prior to him
including the maker cannot be held liable by any holder
– a party whose endorsement is forged on a note originally payable to bearer and all parties prior
to him including the maker may be held liable by a holder in due course provided that it was
mechanically complete before the forgery
– a maker whose signature was forged cannot be held liable by any holder
In a BOE
– the drawer’s account cannot be charged by the drawee where the drawee paid
– the drawer has no right to recover from the collecting bank
– the drawee bank can recover from the collecting bank
– the payee can recover from the recipient of the payment, such as the collecting bank
– the collecting bank bears the loss but can recover from the person to whom it paid
– if the drawee has accepted the bill, the drawee bears the loss and his remedy is to go after the
forger
– if the drawee has not accepted the bill but has paid it, the drawee cannot recover from the
drawer or the recipient of the proceeds, absence any act of negligence on their part.
35. Every negotiable instrument is deemed prima facie to have been issued for a valuable
consideration. (Sec. 24 NIL)
Effects:
– every person whose signature appears thereon is a party for value
36. Where value has at any time been given for the instrument, the holder is deemed a holder for value
in respect to all parties who become such prior to that time. (Sec. 26 NIL)
1. Absence or failure of consideration may be set up against a holder not a holder in due course
(personal defense)
2. Partial failure of consideration is a defense pro tanto (Sec 28 NIL)
Notes on Section 28
– failure of consideration implies that consideration was intended by that it failed to pass
– the defense of want of consideration is ineffective against a holder in due course
– a drawee who accepts the bill cannot allege want of consideration against the drawer
38. An accommodation party is one who signs the instrument as maker, drawer, acceptor, or indorser
without receiving value therefor and for the purpose of lending his name to some other person.
Effects:
– an accommodation party is liable to the holder for value notwithstanding that such holder knew
that of the accommodation. (Sec. 28 NIL)
Notes on Section 28
– the accommodated party cannot recover from the accommodation party
– an accommodation maker may seek reimbursement from a co-maker even in the absence of any
provision in the NIL; the deficiency is supplied by the New Civil Code.
– he may do this even without first proceeding against the debtor provided:
a. he paid by virtue of judicial demand
1. written
2. on the instrument itself or upon a piece of paper attached (Sec. 31 NIL)
Notes on Section 31
– an allonge must be attached so that it becomes a part of the instrument, it cannot be simply
pinned or clipped to it.
– the person indorsing is liable as endorser to such persons as to make title through his
endorsement (Sec. 40 NIL)
Notes on Section 40
– It cannot apply where the instrument is payable to bearer because the only or last endorsement
is in blank.
43. A holder may strike out any endorsement which is not necessary to his title.
Effects:
– All endorsers subsequent to such endorser who has been discharged are likewise relieved. (Sec.
48 NIL)
– the transferee acquires the right to have the endorsement of the transferor
– negotiation takes effect as of the time the endorsement is actually made (Sec. 49 NIL)
Effects:
b. became a holder before it was overdue and had no notice that it had been previously dishonored
if such was the fact
d. at time he took the instrument, no notice of infirmity in instrument or defect in the title of the
person negotiating it (Sec. 52 NIL)
Notes on Section 52
– the person who questions such has the burden of proof to prove otherwise
– if one of the requisites are lacking, the holder is not HDC
– an instrument is considered complete and regular on its face if a) the omission is immaterial b)
the alteration on the instrument was not apparent on its face
– on the date of maturity, the instrument is not overdue and the holder is a HDC
47. A holder is not a HDC where an instrument payable on demand is negotiated at an unreasonable
length of time after its issue (Sec. 53 NIL)
– holds the instrument free from any defect of title of prior parties
– free from defenses available to prior parties among themselves (personal/ equitable defenses)
– may enforce payment of the instrument for the full amount against all parties liable(Sec. 57 NIL)
Notes on Section 57
– Personal or equitable defenses are those which grow out of the agreement or conduct of a
particular person in regard to the instrument which renders it inequitable for him through legal title to
enforce it. Can be set up against holders not HDC
– Legal or real defenses are those which attach to the instrument itself and can be set up against
the whole world, including a HDC.
7. acquisition of the instrument by unlawful Insanity where the insane person has a
means guardian appointed by the court
49. A instrument not in the hands of a HDC is subject to the same defenses as if it were non-negotiable.
Exception:
– a holder who derives his title through a HDC and is not a party to any fraud or illegality affecting
the instrument, has all the rights of such HDC in respect to all parties prior. (Sec. 58 NIL)
– may receive payment and if it is in due course, the instrument is discharged
– holds the instrument subject to the same defenses as if it were non-negotiable
– if he derives his title through a HDC and is not a party to any fraud or illegality thereto, has all the
rights of such HDC
50. General rule: every holder is deemed prima facie to be a holder in due course.
Exception:
– where it is shown that the title of any person who has negotiated the instrument is defective, the
burden is on the holder to prove that he is a HDC or that a person under whom he claims is a HDC (Sec.
59 NIL)
b. admits existence of payee and his capacity to indorse (Sec. 60 NIL)
Notes on Section 60
– one who has signed as such is presumed to have acted with care and to have signed with full
knowledge of its contents, unless fraud is proved
– the payee’s interest is only to see to it that the note is paid according to its terms
– when two or more makers sign jointly, each is individually liable for the full amount even if one
did not receive the value given
– the maker is precluded from setting up the defense of a) the payee is fictional, b) that the payee
was insane, a minor or a corporation acting ultra vires
– a drawer may insert an express stipulation to negative or limit his liability
– engages that he will pay according to the tenor of his acceptance
– admits the existence of the drawer, the genuineness of his signature and his capacity and
authority to draw the instrument
– the existence of the payee and his then capacity indorse
54. Irregular Indorser – a person not otherwise a party to an instrument places his signature in blank
before delivery is liable as an indorser in the following manner:
1. if payable to order of a third person – liable to the payee and to all subsequent parties
2. if payable to order of the maker or drawer – liable to all parties subsequent to the maker or
drawer
3. if payable to bearer – liable to all parties subsequent to the maker or drawer
4. if signs for an accommodation party – liable to all parties subsequent to the payee (Sec. 64 NIL)
55. Warranties where negotiating by delivery or qualified endorsement:
1. the instrument is genuine and in all respect what it purports to be
2. the indorser has good title to it
3. all prior parties had the capacity to contract
4. indorser has no knowledge of any fact that would impair the validity or the value of the
instrument.
Limitations of warranties:
-warranty of capacity to contract does not apply to persons negotiating public or corporate securities
(Sec. 65 NIL)
Notes on Section 65
– a qualified indorser is one who indorses without recourse or sans recourse
– recourse – resort to a person secondarily liable after default of person primarily liable
– a qualified indorser cannot raise the defense of a) forgery b) defect of his title or that it is void c)
the incapacity of the maker, drawer or previous indorsers.
– a qualified Indorsement makes the indorser mere assignor of title of instrument, relieves him of
general obligation to pay if instrument is dishonored, but he is still liable for the warranties arising from
instrument only up to warranties of general indorser
– the warranty is to the capacity of prior parties at the time the instrument was negotiated.
Subsequent incapacity does not breach the warranty.
– lack of knowledge of the indorser as to any fact that would impair the validity or the value of the
instrument must be subsisting all throughout.
– a person Negotiating by Delivery warrants same as those of qualified indorser and extends to
immediate transferees only
In addition:
– engages that the instrument will be accepted or paid or both according to its tenor on due
presentment
– engages to pay the amount thereof if it be dishonored and the necessary proceedings on
dishonor are taken
Notes on Section 66
– the indorser under Section 66 warrants the solvency of a prior party
– the indorser warrants that the instrument is valid and subsisting regardless of whether he is
ignorant of that fact or not.
– warranties extend in favor of a) a HDC b) persons who derive their title from HDC c) immediate
transferees even if not HDC
– the indorser does not warrant the genuineness of the drawer’s signature
57. General rule: Presentment for payment is not necessary to charge persons primarily liable on the
instrument. Presentment for payment is necessary to charge the drawer and indorsers. (Sec 70 NIL)
Notes on Section 70
– presentation for payment – production of a BOE to the drawee for his acceptance, or to a drawee
or acceptor for payment. Also presentment of a PN to the party liable for payment of the same.
– consists of a) a personal demand for payment at a proper place b) the bill or note must be ready
to be exhibited if required and surrendered upon payment.
– parties primarily liable – persons by the terms of the instrument are absolutely required to pay
the same. E.g maker and acceptors. They can be sued directly.
– if payable at the special place, and the person liable is willing to pay there at maturity, such
willingness and ability is equivalent to tender of payment.
– presentment is necessary to charge persons secondarily liable otherwise they are discharged
– Acts needed to charge persons secondarily liable: a) presentment for payment/acceptance b)
dishonor by non-payment/non-acceptance c) notice of dishonor to secondary parties
– Acts needed to charge persons secondarily liable in other cases: a) Protest for non-payment by
the drawee b) protest for non-payment by the acceptor for honor
– only the holder or one authorized by him has the right to make presentment for payment
– presentment for payment is made to the maker, or acceptor. Not to the person secondarily liable.
– if the instrument is payable on demand – a) if it is a note – presentment must be made within
reasonable time after issue b) if it is a bill – presentment must be made within reasonable time after last
negotiation.
61. General rule: Presentment for payment necessary to charge persons secondarily liable otherwise
they are discharged:
Exception:
– only the drawer or indorser are not discharged. All other parties secondarily liable are discharged.
Notes on Section 82
– what is excused is the failure to make presentment. There is no need to make any presentment
versus under section 81 (delay in presentment) presentment for payment is still required after the cause
of delay has ceased.
– when the instrument has been dishonored by non-acceptance under Sec. 83
– the instrument was duly presented but payment is refused or cannot be obtained
– presentment is excused and the instrument is overdue and unpaid (Sec. 83 NIL)
– an immediate right of recourse to all parties secondarily liable accrues to the holder. (Sec. 84 NIL)
Notes on Section 84
– possession of the note by the maker is presumptive evidence that it has been paid
– is a party to the instrument and might be compelled to pay the instrument
– to a holder who having taken it up would have a right of reimbursement from the party to whom
notice is given. (Sec. 90 NIL)
68. Notice:
1. may be written or oral (Sec. 96)
2. written notice need not be signed or may be supplemented by verbal communication (Sec. 95)
3. may be by personal delivery or by mail (Sec. 96)
69. Notice may be waived either expressly or implied:
1. before the time of giving notice has arrived
2. after the omission to give due notice (Sec. 109 NIL)
70. Protest may be waived:
Effects:
– deemed a waiver of presentment and notice of dishonor as well (Sec. 111 NIL)
71. Notice of Dishonor – given by the holder to the parties secondarily liable, drawer and each
indorser, that the instrument was dishonored by non-acceptance or non-payment by the drawee/maker
General rule: Any drawer or indorser to whom such notice is not given is discharged.
Exceptions:
d. drawer has no right to expect that the drawee will accept/pay the instrument (Sec. 114 NIL)
a. drawee was a fictitious/incapacitated person and the indorser was aware of such at the time of
indorsement
b. indorser is the person to whom instrument was presented for payment
74. Omission to give notice of dishonor by non-acceptance doe not prejudice a HDC (Sec. 117 NIL)
75. Protest only necessary for a foreign bill of exchange. Protest for other negotiable instruments is
optional. (Sec. 118 NIL)
e. debtor becomes holder of the instrument at/after maturity in his own right ( Sec 119 NIL)
– payment must be in due course, and by the principal debtor or on his behalf
– if payment is not made by the principal debtor, payment only cancels the liability of the payor
and those obligated after him but does not discharge the instrument.
– the party is remitted to his former rights as to all prior parties
– the party may strike out his own and all subsequent indorsements
Exception:
– an instrument cannot be renegotiated where it is payable to order of a 3 rd person and has been
paid by the drawer
– and instrument cannot be renegotiated where is was made or accepted for accommodation and
it has been paid by the party accommodated.
– if renounced in favor of a party secondarily liable, only he is exonerated from liability and all
parties subsequent to him
79. General rule: When materially altered, without the consent of all parties liable, the instrument is
avoided except as against:
Exception:
– if in the hands of a HDC, may be enforced according to its original tenor
80. Material Alteration – an alternation is said to be material if it alters the effect of the instrument.
Under Section 125 the following changes are considered material alterations:
1. dates
2. the sum payable
3. time and place of payment
4. number or relations of the parties
5. medium or currency for payment
6. adding a place of payment where no place is specified
7. any other which alters the affect of the instrument
81. Instances where a BOE may be treated as a PN:
1. where the drawer and the drawee are one and the same
2. where the drawee is a fictitious person
3. where the drawee has no capacity to contract (Sec. 130 NIL)
82. Acceptance is the signification by the drawee of his assent to the order of the drawer. It is an act by
which a person on whom the BOE is drawn assents to the request of the drawer to pay it. (Sec. 132 NIL)
– in writing
– must not express the drawee will perform his promise by any other means than payment of
money
– Presentment is the production of a BOE to the drawee for his acceptance
a. to make the drawee primarily liable and for the accrual of secondary liability (Sec. 144)
b. necessary to fix maturity date, where bill expressly stipulates presentment, bill payable other than
place of drawee (Sec. 143)
c. when presentment is excused: drawee is dead, hides, is fictitious, incapacitated person, after due
diligence presentment cannot be made, presentment is refused on another ground although
presentment is irregular (Sec. 148)
Exception:
Protest is required:
1. where the foreign bill is dishonored by non acceptance
2. where the foreign bill is dishonored by non-payment
3. where the bill has been accepted for honor, it must be protested for non-payment before it is
presented for payment to the acceptor for honor
4. where the bill contains a referee in case of need, it must be protested for non payment before
presentment for payment to the referee in case of need (Sec. 152)
Notes on Section 152
– Protest – formal statement in writing made by a notary under his seal of office at the request of
the holder, in which it is declare that the some was presented for payment or acceptance (as the case
may be) and such was refused.
– it means all steps or acts accompanying the dishonor of a bill or note necessary to charge an
indorser
– it must be made on the same date of dishonor, by a notary/respectable citizen of the place in the
presence of 2 credible witnesses so recourse to secondary parties
1. Acceptance for Honor (Sec. 161 NIL)– an acceptance of a bill made by a stranger to it before
maturirty, where the drawee of the bill has:
1. refused to accept it
2. and the bill has been protested for non-acceptance
3. or where the bill has been protested for better security
Requisites for acceptance for honor:
– the bill must have been previously protested a) for non-acceptance b) or for better security
– the bill is not overdue at the time of the acceptance for honor
– Purpose: to save the credit of the parties to the instrument or some party to it as the drawer,
drawee, or indorser or somebody else.
– Acceptor for honor is liable to the holder and to all the parties to the bill subsequent to the party
for whose honor he has accepted (Sec. 164)
3. Payment for Honor – payment made through a notarial act of honor of a party liable/stranger to
the bill after bill has been dishonored by non-payment by the acceptor and protested for non-
payment by the holder
Requisites:
4. Bills in Set – bill of exchange drawn in several parts, each part of the set being numbered and
containing a reference to the other parts, the whole of the parts just constituting one bill (Sec 178
NIL)
Source:
Commercial Law Memory Aid
Negotiable Instruments Law
Ateneo Central Bar Operations 2001
Advertisements
REPORT THIS AD
Posted in Commercial Law, Negotiable Instruments Law
5 Comments
Tags: commecial law, commlaw, negotiable instruments law
SEARCH HERE
Go
Search for:
SUBSCRIBE
Join 1,268 other followers
Email Address:
Subscribe by email
RECENT POSTS
o Legal Ethics Case Digests – Imposition of Proper Penalty
o Legal Ethics Case Digests – Grant of a Motion for Reconsideration
o Legal Ethics Case Digests – Issuance of an Order of Release
o Legal Ethics Case Digests – Granting of Bail
o Legal Ethics Case Digests – Payment of Docket Fees in Election Cases
o Legal Ethics Case Digests – Improper Imposition of the Punishment of Contempt
o Legal Ethics Case Digests – Misrepresentation and Non-payment of IBP Dues
o Legal Ethics Case Digests – Duty of Lawyer to Client/Proper Conduct
o Legal Ethics Case Digests – Duty to Client/Accounting of Client’s Money/Negligence
o Legal Ethics Case Digests – Duty to the Court/Negligence of a Lawyer
o Jokes Part IV
o Jokes Part III
o Jokes Part II
o Jokes Part I
o 2014 Bar Examinations set in October
o Civil Law – Property
o Civil Law – Land Titles
o Pre-Bar Quizzer in Political Law – PART 2: Constitution of Liberty 101 – 120
o Pre-Bar Quizzer in Political Law – PART 2: Constitution of Liberty 91 – 100
o Pre-Bar Quizzer in Political Law – PART 2: Constitution of Liberty 81 – 90
PAGES
o Home
o Digests
Legal Ethics Case Digests
Criminal Law Case Digests
o Reviewers
Administrative Law
Civil Law
Civil Procedure
Commercial Law
Constitutional Law
Criminal Law
Criminal Procedure
Election Law
Insurance Code
Legal Ethics
Negotiable Instruments Law
Political Law
o Jokes
o Contact Me
CATEGORIES
o Administrative Law
o BAR Exam
o Civil Law
o Civil Procedure
o Commercial Law
o Constitutional Law
o Criminal Law
o Digests
o Insurance Code
o Jokes
o Legal Ethics
o Negotiable Instruments Law
o Political Law
o Remedial Law
ARCHIVES
o September 2014
o August 2014
o July 2014
o June 2014
o January 2012
o December 2011
o October 2011
o September 2011
o July 2011
o June 2011
o May 2011
ABOUT ME
Magz
First of all, I am not a lawyer. I'm a graduate of AB Political Science and went to the College of Law but
stopped going to law school for some reasons. I'm a passionate teacher who has been teaching English
to speakers of other languages and a person who likes writing and blogging. I lost some important files
and software when my computer broke down so the reason I created this website is to preserve the
notes, reviewers and digests I collected when I was at the law school and at the same time, I want to
help out law students who do not have enough time to go and read books in the library.
View Full Profile →
META
o Register
o Log in
o Entries feed
o Comments feed
o WordPress.com
Advertisements
REPORT THIS AD
Blog at WordPress.com.
Follow