Running head: UNDERSTANDING SATANISM
Understanding Satanism More Completely: Iconoclasm in Vain
                         Valerie G.R.A.E. R-A. Johnson
                              Legend High School
                              ENG 122: Period 5
                               Ms. Ashlee Tripp
                                 April 5, 2020
                                                                                                     2
               Understanding Satanism More Completely: Iconoclasm in Vain
        Satanism: by definition, “the worship of Satan, typically involving a travesty of Christian
symbols and practices, such as placing a cross upside down.”
        In reality, Satanism is slightly more complicated than the simplistic “definition”
encompasses, and often has nothing to do with The Devil. This usually harmless philosophical
system has been stigmatized and dragged through the metaphorical dumpster: perhaps
undeservedly, having been mistaken for Devil-worship. However despite being certric around
virtues like individualism, iconoclasm, and nonconformity, Satanism falls into many of the same
issues that Christianity does. The objective of this paper is to prove, through the use of
substantial and unequivocal evidence, that Satanism is not inherently evil, and teaches both
valuable and worthless lessons, just like any other religion. The evil reputation Satanism receives
is a result of the reactive, blasphemous nature of the religion combined with an uneducated moral
panic in primarily Christian societies.
        The name Satanism comes from prominent Satanist organizations using the actions of
biblical Satan as a symbolic structure for their values. These values (including rebellion against
authority, individualism, and pride) combine to form a belief system similar to punk philosophy.
As recognized by Taub & Nelson (1993), “Satanism, as an ideology, is frequently defined either
too broadly or too narrowly. For example, Lanning (1989) observes that a number of religions
are mistakenly labelled ‘Satanic,’ including Santeria, Witchcraft, and various Eastern religions;
similarly, fraternal organizations such as Freemasonry are sometimes considered Satanic” (p.
525).
                                                                                                     3
       There are two prevalent Satanist organizations: the Church of Satan (CoS) and the
Satanic Temple (TST). The Church of Satan is, while atheist, still a religious organization, the
leaders of which regularly publish books and essays on Satanist philosophy. The Satanic Temple
is atheist and non-religious, and focuses on political activism, advocating for secularism, equal
rights, and several other noble pursuits. The CoS was founded by Anton LaVey in 1969 and the
TST was founded by Lucien Greaves and Malcolm Jarry in 2013.
       These organizations are completely separate, connected only by nonconformist beliefs
and the term Satanism. The Church of Satan (while not ritualistic murderers or abusers) support
apoliticism and anti-authoritarianism. This support is in direct contrast with their stated tenets. A
prime example of this is when, in March 2015, (just three months before the legalization of gay
marriage,) the CoS began producing and selling “Inequality Polo Shirts” (Palmer 2015),
emblazoned with loud inequivalence symbols. The shirt is supplemented with an advertisement
stating that “Egalitarianism is a myth that breeds weakness & rewards mediocrity. [They]
embrace the stratified & Darwinian reality of Nature” (Palmer 2015), and believe that “the entire
concept of equality is simply one of wishful thinking or flight of fancy that, very much like the
concept of reincarnation, will allow the lowest to feel that they are equal to the highest” (LaVey
1992). These beliefs are objectively discriminatory and elitist, but “embracing the … Darwinian
reality of Nature” is legitimately a Nazist ideology. The support of social Darwinism, the theory
that individuals and peoples are subject to the laws of natural selection just as plants and animals,
is what “justified” the abhorrent actions of the Nazi party and the 1999 Colorado Columbine
school shooters, and many more terrorist groups.
                                                                                                      4
       LaVey also blatantly was “all for a police state; no messing around” (1997) and
advocated the presence of “an armed guard on every street corner” (1997). Not only is this
against the CoS’s deeply-held resentment for authority, the implementation of police states has
historically been a main ingredient in fascist societies.
       In short, the doctrine that Church members put forth is contradictory to their supposed
principles. They claim to “support the legalization of gay marriage” (Gilmore, n.d.) but advertize
inequality shirts before the legalization; they claim to have accepted transgender people “since
the organization was founded in 1966” (Gilmore, n.d.) but LaVey (1998) calls a transgender man
“an ersatz man at worst and an incomplete woman at best” (p. 13); they claim to be apolitical,
but outright supporting and endorsing Nazi philosophies is anything but.
       Even the idea of an individualist organization is intrinsically illogical: a good example of
an individualist movement is ANTIFA, for which there is no headquarters, local chapters,
website, or leaders — just individuals working with the same ideology.
       The connection between LaVeyan Satanism and Nazism was so widely recognized that in
the 1990s, “Nazi satanic cults that combine paganism with praise for Hitler and the Third Reich”
(Goodrick-Clarke, 2003, p. 215) began sprouting up. These groups are major components and
inflamers of the late 20th century Satanic panic, in which invisible Satanist cults were accused of
Satanic ritual abuse (SRA): primarily barbaric child abuse. The drastic rise and fall of
accusations is indicative of a moral panic (as shown in Figure 1), and it is clear that many of the
SRA cases were falsified. The details of this statistic have always been relatively vague, but
“survey research has found that those psychotherapists who claim to have had patients with
memories of SRA, are also those who are most likely to use ‘memory recovery’ techniques
                                                                                                 5
(Bottoms, Shaver, and Goodman 1996). Many cognitive psychologists suggest that the ‘memory
recovery’ techniques employed by some therapists” (Victor, 1998, p. 554) to uncover forgotten
memories of SRA “are the means by which false memories are elicited (Lindsey and Read 1994;
Loftus 1993)” (p. 554). These techniques can include hypnosis and dream interpretation.
(Figure 1. As of 03 May 2020, retrieved from
https://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?year_start=1800&year_end=2008&corpus=15&smoothi
ng=7&case_insensitive=on&content=satanism&direct_url=t4%3B%2Csatanism%3B%2Cc0%3
B%2Cs0%3B%3BSatanism%3B%2Cc0%3B%3Bsatanism%3B%2Cc0%3B%3BSATANISM%
3B%2Cc0#t4%3B%2Csatanism%3B%2Cc0%3B%2Cs0%3B%3BSatanism%3B%2Cc0%3B%3
Bsatanism%3B%2Cc0%3B%3BSATANISM%3B%2Cc0)
       The Satanic Temple is a less complicated matter to consider, with less history to consider
and having been founded after the Satanic panic. For the most part, the Temple seems to be
kindly, satirical political activists, looking “to encourage benevolence and empathy among all
people, reject tyrannical authority, advocate practical common sense, oppose injustice, and
undertake noble pursuits” (Greaves, n.d.). The Temple primarily uses Satanic imagery to call
                                                                                                  6
attention to religious hypocrisy, and promote secularism. A good example of this is their After
School Satan club, formed after “the Supreme Court ruled in Good News Club v. Milford Central
School that schools may not discriminate against religious speech and thereby affirmed the rights
of religious organizations to operate clubs on public school premises after school hours”
(Greaves, n.d.). When this resulted in countless proselytizing Christian clubs, TST legally and
fairly formed their own Satanic club. However, while occasionally achieving noble goals, TST
will sometimes overexaggerate victories or accidentally harm the populations they try to protect.
       In 2014, a statue of the 10 Commandments was removed from public property in
Oklahoma, local judges ruling that the government “explicitly endorsing the message of one
religion over another” (Newell, 2015) violated the state constitution as well as the American
constitution. The Satanic Temple treated the court ruling as their victory, having applied to erect
a statue of Baphomet next to the 10 Commandments statue; however, TST did not win the court
case. Conversely, it was won by three Christians working with ACLU Oklahoma, all who
supported secularism.
       In 2013, as a response to vile action by the Westboro Baptist Church, the “Satanic
Temple went to Meridian, Mississippi to perform a Pink Mass at the gravesite of the mother of
Westboro Baptist founder, Fred Phelps” (Greaves, n.d.). The Pink Mass supposedly “turned his
mother gay in the afterlife” (n.d.). This succeeded in angering the Westboro Baptist Church, and
while this is an action against an extremist and violently homophobic organization, the subtext is
that people (alive or dead) can be turned gay or straight. The Westboro Baptist Church is
notorious for performing conversion therapy, an incredibly harmful and often deadly attempt at
turning gays straight. By trying to provoke the Church, TST accidentally affirmed them.
                                                                                                       7
        The Satanic Temple certainly has noble goals, but few actual accomplishments. They
often affiliate the populations they protect with the unpopular idea of the Devil instead of staying
within the realm of secularist political activists, where they could be (but unfortunately are not
yet quite) effective.
        The stigmatization of Satanism is a combined result of the nonconformist nature of the
philosophy and the fallout of a major moral panic. The Satanic panic of the 80’s and 90’s can be
illustrated purely through analyzing timely sources. A police training manual focusing purely on
Satanic cults published in the midst of the panic provides a “comprehensive” profile of a young
person who may be involved in Satanic activity — among the list of criteria is included “anxiety,
feelings of a lack of control, self mutilation, objects such as candles, stones, and oils, obsession
with fantasy role-playing games, [and] obsession with heavy-metal music” (Hurst & Marsh,
1993). It can be objectively stated that many of these alleged indicators are unfortunately
common occurrences for a teenager, and the rest simply have nothing to do with Satanism. If we
still used these standards, it would appear that effectively all of the youth of today are at high
risk for Satanism. Despite having earned a Ph.D. and Sc.D., Hurst (a Christian police officer
from Texas) manages to consistently use improper grammar and contradict himself throughout
the entire training manual. At the end of the document, Hurst includes a list of supposedly
Satanic symbols, including peace and yin yang signs, the Star of David, and the stylized names
of popular metal bands AC/DC, Twisted Sister, Ozzy Osbourne, and Kiss. Nearly all of these
symbols appear to be hand-drawn.
                                                                                                       8
           The Satanic panic mirrored many recorded moral panics and conspiracy theories,
including the blood libel against Jews in the 30s CE and forward, (in which Jews were accused
of murdering Christian babies in order to use their blood for religious rituals,) and the witch
hunts of the 16th and 17th centuries (in which accusations of unholy witchcraft, mostly put forth
by adolescent women later found to be under the effect of LSD, resulted in innocent people being
hanged, pressed, or burned until dead). It seems, at least historically, that Christians nearly never
tire of stirring up nonexistent religious drama.
           Despite its dissident tenets, Satanism at its core is remarkably similar to many other
faiths. Factors such as moral panics, association with The Devil, social deviance, and fear
mongering tactics of Christian churches are responsible for Satanism’s stigmatization. Through
trying to sever themselves from the rest of society using the shock value of the Devil and various
deviant philosophies, Satanists ironically enter the same pitfalls that many religions do:
splintering organizations, literal interpretations of metaphor, and prejudice justified by religious
beliefs.
           Satanists appear to be neither ritualistic murderers nor scapegoated philosophers. In
actuality, they are most often simply people, who hold a peculiar aesthetic and questionable
values.
                                                                                                 9
                                           References
Burton, T. I. (2017, October 31). Take religion. remove God. add #resistance. meet the Satanic
       temple. Retrieved March 11, 2020, from Vox website:
       https://www.vox.com/identities/2017/10/31/16560150/religion-god-resistance-satanic-te
       mple
Dunbar, D., Ph.D., & Swart, S, Ph.D. (2012). 'No less of a foe than Satan himself': The Devil,
       transition and moral panic in the white South Africa, 1989-1993. Journal of Southern
       African Studies, 38(3), 601-621. Retrieved from JSTOR database.
Ethan, J. (n.d.). The Satanic Temple fact sheet [Fact sheet]. Retrieved April 5,
       2020, from https://www.churchofsatan.com/the-satanic-temple-fact-sheet/
Gilmore, P. H. (n.d.). F.A.Q. Fundamental Beliefs. Retrieved March 6, 2020, from Church of
       Satan website: https://www.churchofsatan.com/faq-fundamental-beliefs/
Gilmore, P. H. (2008). The satanic scriptures. Baltimore, Md.: Scapegoat.
Gilmore, P. H., LaVey, A. S., & Palmer, A. S. (2015, March 27). Inequality polo shirt - ASP
       apparel Satanic showcase. Retrieved March 24, 2020, from Church of Satan website:
       https://www.churchofsatan.com/inequality-polo-shirt-asp-apparel-satanic/
Goodrick-Clarke, N. (2003). Nazi Satanism and the new aeon. In Black sun: Aryan cults, esoteric
       Nazism, and the politics of identity (Vol. 1, pp. 213-231). New York, NY: New York
       University Press.
Google. (n.d.). Google Ngram viewer [Chart]. Retrieved from
       https://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?year_start=1800&year_end=2008&corpus=15&
       smoothing=7&case_insensitive=on&content=satanism&direct_url=t4%3B%2Csatanism
                                                                                                  10
        %3B%2Cc0%3B%2Cs0%3B%3BSatanism%3B%2Cc0%3B%3Bsatanism%3B%2Cc0%
        3B%3BSATANISM%3B%2Cc0#t4%3B%2Csatanism%3B%2Cc0%3B%2Cs0%3B%3B
        Satanism%3B%2Cc0%3B%3Bsatanism%3B%2Cc0%3B%3BSATANISM%3B%2Cc0
Greaves, L. (n.d.). Learn. Retrieved March 11, 2020, from The Satanic Temple website:
        https://thesatanictemple.com/pages/learn
Greaves, L. (n.d.). What is the difference between the Satanic Temple and the Church of Satan?
        Retrieved March 24, 2020, from The Satanic Temple website:
        https://thesatanictemple.com/pages/what-is-the-difference-between-the-satanic-temple-an
        d-the-church-of-satan
La Vey, A. S. (1997). The Doctor is in... (Interview by S. Bugbee & A. Bugbee). MF Magazine,
        3. Retrieved from https://www.churchofsatan.com/interview-mf-magazine/
La Vey, A. S. (1998). The third side: The uncomfortable alternative. In Satan speaks! (pp.
        11-12). Venice, CA: Feral House.
National Institute of Justice. (1993, January). Satanic cult awareness (G. W. Hurst, Sc.D., Ph.D.
        & R. L. Marsh, Authors). Retrieved from NCJRS Virtual Library database. (Accession
        No. 140554)
Newell, B. (2015, July 13). 13 FAQ about the Oklahoma ten commandments decision.
        Retrieved April 5, 2020, from
        https://www.acluok.org/en/news/13-faq-about-oklahoma-ten-commandments-decision
Reichert, J., & Richardson, J. T. (2012). Decline of a moral panic: A socio-legal examination of
        the current status of Satanism. Nova Religio: The Journal of Alternative and Emergent
        Religions, 16(2), 47-63. https://doi.org/10.1525/nr.2012.16.2.47
                                                                                                      11
Taub, D. E., & Nelson, L. D. (1993). Satanism in contemporary America: Establishment or
       underground? Sociological Quarterly, 34(3), 523-541.
       https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1533-8525.1993.tb00124.x
Victor, J. S. (1998). Moral panics and the social construction of deviant behavior: A theory and
       applcation to the case of ritual child abuse. Sociological Perspective, 41( 3), 541-565.
       https://doi.org/10.2307/1389563