0% found this document useful (0 votes)
40 views3 pages

5.1 Project No P01

This soil investigation report provides recommendations for the foundation of a proposed G+2 building in Cochin, India. One borehole (BH-01) was drilled to a depth of 60m using rotary drilling methods. The soil profile consisted of fill soil, medium to fine sand, clay with sand and shells, loose clay, laterite clay, stiff clay with decayed wood, clay sand, and charconic clay with sand. Laboratory tests were conducted to determine soil properties. Based on shear capacity and settlement criteria calculations, the safe bearing capacity of the soil is 29 T/m2. The recommended foundation type is a square footing with a width of 2m and depth of 1.5m.

Uploaded by

Dileep K Nambiar
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
40 views3 pages

5.1 Project No P01

This soil investigation report provides recommendations for the foundation of a proposed G+2 building in Cochin, India. One borehole (BH-01) was drilled to a depth of 60m using rotary drilling methods. The soil profile consisted of fill soil, medium to fine sand, clay with sand and shells, loose clay, laterite clay, stiff clay with decayed wood, clay sand, and charconic clay with sand. Laboratory tests were conducted to determine soil properties. Based on shear capacity and settlement criteria calculations, the safe bearing capacity of the soil is 29 T/m2. The recommended foundation type is a square footing with a width of 2m and depth of 1.5m.

Uploaded by

Dileep K Nambiar
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 3

5.

1 PROJECT NO P01

5.1.1 Soil Investigation Report

1 Introduction
There is a proposal for the construction of the building (G+2) at Cochin. To
determine the type of foundation and the bearing capacity of the subsoil, it was decided to
conduct soil investigation. It was decided to conduct Standard penetration test for 1 bore hole
by Rotary drilling method.

2 Scope of Works
a. Mobilization of boring machinery including all accessories, tools and plants and
skilled/unskilled personal necessary for field work.
b. Drilling 1 bore hole /standard penetration test /Rotary drilling Method.
c. Collection of disturbed samples.
d. preparation of soil report based on laboratory experiments and bore log sheet

3 Field Investigations

Table 5.1(i) Bore holes

Number Depth(m) Water Table Level(m from


Ground level)
BH 01 60.00 -0.300
_ _ _
_ _ _

4 Laboratory Investigations
To evaluate the properties of soil following lab tests were conducted
 Determination of Density
 Determination of Water content of soil
 Determination of Specific gravity of soil
 Grain size analysis
21
 Determination of Atterberg’sLimit
 Determination of Shear strength parameters using Direct shear test and Triaxial
Apparatus
All Laboratory tests were conducted as per relevant IS Specifications

5 Discussion and Recommendations


Recommendations are based on the assumption that the soil profile found in the
borehole tested is indicative of the entire plot area. Any deviation in soil profile other than
those observed in the borehole tested should immediately be referred to the consultant and
proper modification should be implemented.

Soil Profile
As per instruction of Engineer, it was decided to take one borehole at the site.
In BH-01, the top 0.40m comprise of filled soling. Below this medium to fine sand was
having SPT value of 36, 38, 31, 27&15was noted for every 1.50m depth extending up to a
depth of 8.80m.This was followed by clay with sand and sheldust having SPT value of 0 to 1
was noted extending up to a depth of 17.90m.Below this loose clay having SPT value of 0 to
1 was noted extending up to a depth of 25.80m.
Below this Laterite clay having SPT value of 24, 21, 20&17 15 was noted for every
3m depth extending up to a depth of 38.90m.Below this found Stiff clay with decayed wood
having SPT value of 16, 17&19 for every 3m depth extending up to a depth of 48.10m.Below
this clay sand having SPT value of 50 was noted extending up to a depth of 53.2m.Below this
decayed wood having SPT value of 46 was noted extending up to a depth of 55.1m. Below
this charconic clay with sand (2.7m thick), medium sand (2.2m thick) was noted extending
up to a depth of 60m.Borehole terminated at 60m depth. Water Table was noted at a depth of
0.30m from ground level during the time of investigation. From the study of borehole for
structure following recommendation are made.

22
6 Calculations
6.1 Shallow Foundation
6.1.1 Bearing Capacity from Shear Criteria
As per IS 6403-1981 clause 5.1.2, the ultimate net bearing capacity is can be
calculated from equation,
qu =CNcsc dc ic +q(Nq-1)sqdq iq+0.50B g Ng sg dg ig w’

Table 5.1(ii): Bearing Capacity Parameters


Type of Soil cohesion less soil
Type of failure general shear failure
B= 2 L = 2 C=0 phi(ф) 35
Nc= 46.13 sc = 1.3 dc= 1.05 ic= 1
Nq= 33.3 sq= 1.2 dq= 1.02 iq= 1

Ng= 48.03 sg= 0.8 dg = 1.02 ig = 1

w'= 0.5 F.S= 2.5 Df= 1.5 g= 21

qu works out to be 166 T/m2 and qsafe 66 T/m2 for shearcriteria

6.1.2 Shallow Foundation- Bearing Capacity From Settlement Criteria


As per IS 8009(PART1)-1976, the ultimate net bearing capacity was calculated.
Average SPT value of 30 is noted in the zone of influence of pressure (considering a footing
of width 2 m) for settlement of 40mm, qsafe works out to be 29 T/m2 for settlement criteria.

7 Result
Safe bearing capacity of soil = 29 T/m2

Type of Foundation =square footing

Width of foundation =2m

Depth of foundation =1.5m

23

You might also like