Scribd
Upload
63 views1 page

Response Paper Ii H. Mohamed Abdul Raaziq BC0150015 Comment On Professional Etics On Transnational Lawyers

1) Transnational lawyers face a daunting maze of conflicting ethical rules from different jurisdictions as the global regulation of law has not fully matured. 2) Major law firms have begun to navigate this challenge, with their general counsel taking responsibility for cross-border ethical issues rather than lawyers addressing complexities directly. 3) There is a disconnect between how lawyers and clients view ethics, as clients demand total commitment to business ends while lawyers take ethics seriously, putting pressure on lawyers' morals in serving corporate interests.

Uploaded by

Mohamed Raaziq
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
63 views1 page

Response Paper Ii H. Mohamed Abdul Raaziq BC0150015 Comment On Professional Etics On Transnational Lawyers

1) Transnational lawyers face a daunting maze of conflicting ethical rules from different jurisdictions as the global regulation of law has not fully matured. 2) Major law firms have begun to navigate this challenge, with their general counsel taking responsibility for cross-border ethical issues rather than lawyers addressing complexities directly. 3) There is a disconnect between how lawyers and clients view ethics, as clients demand total commitment to business ends while lawyers take ethics seriously, putting pressure on lawyers' morals in serving corporate interests.

Uploaded by

Mohamed Raaziq
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

RESPONSE PAPER II

H. Mohamed Abdul Raaziq


BC0150015
COMMENT ON PROFESSIONAL ETICS ON TRANSNATIONAL LAWYERS
The prospect of being a transnational lawyer or a global lawyer is a daunting one as
lawyers wend their ways through the maze of conflicting rules that govern their working lives.
This comes about because of the nascent state of global law and its regulation, which has not yet
reached maturity so the necessary institutions are still to be created. The situation is not,
however, insoluble as the major Anglo-American law firms have begun to navigate their way in
global practice. The result is, perhaps a perverse one that lawyers inside these firms do not think
about cross-border ethical issues because of their intrinsic complexity and the pressures 10 of
work: this has instead become the remit of firms’ own general counsel. To be somewhat
skeptical, it is reasonable to say that institutional laziness impelled these legal systems to the top
rather than any inherent legal superiority. It enabled a global reach across multiple legal
jurisdictions at relatively low cost. The problem of the local jurisdiction was not totally removed
but at least it was contained. Perhaps this is best summarized rather whimsically by one in-house
counsel who said, “Like all good professionals we make it up as we go along and hid our copy of
Libyan Law for Dummies under a pile of learned papers”
It may be that the perceptions of clients and lawyers are too far apart. Lawyers are a profession
where ethical responsibility is taken seriously, however clients demand total commitment by
their advisers to their business ends. Here we see a double shift. The lawyer, to succeed in the
corporate world, takes on the persona of business both in her own organization in order to
maximize her returns and as her guiding principle in serving her clients’ business. Does this
mean business is amoral and that lawyers are prevented from acting ethically with corporate
clients? Not necessarily. Even Adam Smith was aware of the role of morality in the marketplace
when he wrote the Theory of Moral Sentiments. And in the last few years there has been a
movement in business schools to introduce an MBA oath to “create value responsibly and
ethically”. Law firms are highly aware of the growing impact of the regulatory state on their
practice, as repeated scandals like the savings and loans debacle and the collapse of Enron
graphically demonstrate. And perhaps Goldsmiths’ Brussels lawyer friend was not being overly
cynical in his description of practice as being all about billable hours and not service. But what
these appear to be telling us is what Simon refers to as “another dimension of the loss of agency
is the lawyer’s insensitivity to the underlying moral stakes of his work” (1998: 115). Corporate
practice is intensifying the moral anxieties of professionalism and will increase the pressures for
external regulation over self-regulation.

You might also like