Scribd
Upload
59 views2 pages

Project Evaluation Form Guide

This document is a project evaluation form for examining student projects. It is divided into five parts that evaluate different aspects of the project. Part I (15 points) evaluates the problem statement, idea, planning, and coding standards of the project. Part II (10 points) evaluates the clarity, depth of knowledge, verbal/non-verbal communication, and use of supporting materials in the project presentation. Part III (35 points) assesses documentation like the SRS report, UML diagrams, ERD, and test cases. Part IV (30 points) involves a project viva with three questions. Part V (10 points) evaluates the demonstration and poster summarizing the final year project. The examiner signs and dates the

Uploaded by

Kamran SH
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
59 views2 pages

Project Evaluation Form Guide

This document is a project evaluation form for examining student projects. It is divided into five parts that evaluate different aspects of the project. Part I (15 points) evaluates the problem statement, idea, planning, and coding standards of the project. Part II (10 points) evaluates the clarity, depth of knowledge, verbal/non-verbal communication, and use of supporting materials in the project presentation. Part III (35 points) assesses documentation like the SRS report, UML diagrams, ERD, and test cases. Part IV (30 points) involves a project viva with three questions. Part V (10 points) evaluates the demonstration and poster summarizing the final year project. The examiner signs and dates the

Uploaded by

Kamran SH
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

School of Professional Advancement

Project Evaluation Form

CIRCULAR IN
Examiner Name: __________________________ Examiner: Internal External

Part-1: (15 points)

Criteria for Evaluation Muhammad Asif Muhammad


Umar Arshad

1- Problem Statement
(3 points)

2- Idea Proposed /
Contextualization
(3 points)

3- Planning
 Realistic timings
given
 Realising the
resources required
(2 points)

4- Methodology
 Monitoring tools
 Methods for
evaluating results
(3 points)

5- Coding Standards
 Comments
 Readable yet efficient
 Not much Hard-Code
 Use of API’s
 Use of IDE’s drop-
down menu
(4 points)

Part II: Presentation Evaluation (10 points)

6- Clarity of Explanation
(2 points)

7- Depth of Knowledge
(2 points)

8- Verbal and Body Language


(2 points)

University of Management & Technology


School of Professional Advancement

9- Use of supporting
documents / elements
(2 points)

10- Professionalism of
Presentation
(2 points)

Part III: Documentation (35 points)

SRS Report (10 points)

Validity of UML Diagrams (10


points)

ERD and Databases (5 points)

Accuracy of Test Cases (10


points)

Part IV: Project Viva (30 points)

Q1:

Q2:

Q3:

Part V: Showcase of FYP (10 points)

Demonstration

Flex/Poster summarizing their


FYP

Date and signature of the examiner ___________________________________________

University of Management & Technology

You might also like