Articulo I Tesis
Articulo I Tesis
The reactions of transition metal (M) atoms Zr and Nb with ethylene (C2H4) were studied using the technique
of crossed molecular beams. Angular and velocity distributions of MC2H2 products following H2 elimination
were measured at collision energies between 5 and 23 kcal/mol using electron impact and 157 nm
photoionization mass spectrometry. Photodepletion studies identify that the atomic reactants are predominantly
in their ground electronic states and that the observed MC2H2 products result primarily from reactions of
these ground-state atoms. Center-of-mass product angular distributions derived from the data indicate that
Downloaded by UNIV NACIONAL AUTONOMA MEXICO on August 31, 2015 | http://pubs.acs.org
reactions involve the formation of intermediate complexes having lifetimes longer than their rotational periods.
Product translational energy distributions demonstrate that a large fraction of excess available energy is
channeled into product internal excitation. Wide-angle nonreactive scattering of metal atom reactants following
decay of long-lived MC2H4 association complexes was also observed for both transition metal reactants at
collision energies g 9 kcal/mol, with approximately 36% of the initial translational energy converted into
Publication Date (Web): April 24, 1999 | doi: 10.1021/jp9846633
C2H4 internal excitation. At collision energies of e 6 kcal/mol, nonreactive scattering of Zr from ZrC2H4
decay was found to be negligible, whereas this channel was clearly observed for Nb. RRKM modeling of the
competition between decay of MC2H4 complexes back to M + C2H4 and C-H insertion forming HMC2H3
indicates that there exists an adiabatic potential energy barrier for M + C2H4 association in the case of Zr and
that the transition state for this process is tighter than for the analogous process in Nb + C2H4. The barrier
for Zr + C2H4 association is attributed to the repulsive s2 ground state configuration of Zr, whereas for Nb
the s1 ground state configuration results in no barrier for association. The absence of decay of ZrC2H4 back
to Zr + C2H4 at low collision energies indicates that the barrier for C-H insertion forming HZrC2H3 lies
below the barrier for Zr + C2H4 association. This opens up the possibility that direct C-H insertion without
initial ZrC2H4 formation may play an important role.
cyclopropane complex. Consequently, C-H bond insertion may required to access the insertion intermediate. Although diabatic
be preceded by formation of the metallacyclopropane complex. curves of different spin multiplicities are more weakly coupled
However, according to calculations,19 the optimized transition than those of the same multiplicity, for 4d series atoms, spin-
state for C-H insertion has an M-C-C bond angle greater orbit interactions can effectively couple the two states. Calcula-
than 120°. This transition state, calculated to lie 1.8 kcal/mol tions suggest that when the system accesses the quartet reaction
above the ground-state reactants, lies quite far from the coordinate via a curve crossing, there are no potential energy
equilibrium geometry of the MC2H4 complex which has an barriers to dehydrogenation above the Nb(a6D) + C2H4 asymp-
M-C-C angle considerably smaller than 90° (Figure 1).13,18,19 tote (Figure 2). Carroll and co-workers observed that at room
Thus the C-H bond insertion step in the Zr + C2H4 reaction temperature, ground-state Nb (a6D1/2) reactant is depleted by
may also occur directly, without first accessing the deep well ethylene at approximately the gas kinetic limit under low-
associated with the M-C2H4 complex. pressure conditions where termolecular processes should be
Following C-H bond insertion, a second intramolecular negligible.11,13 Thus, Nb is five times more reactive than Zr at
rearrangement may lead to formation of an H2MC2H2 interme- an average collision energy of 0.9 kcal/mol.
diate.13 This species may be either a metal-acetylene type
II. Experiment
complex (Figure 1) or a metal-vinylidene complex (H2Md
CdCH2). To date, ab initio calculations have focused only on All of the experiments described in this paper were performed
the metal-acetylene structure.13 Either intermediate can elimi- using a newly constructed universal crossed molecular beams
nate molecular hydrogen. Because potential energy barriers for apparatus (Figure 3).23-25 The apparatus facilitates production
the reverse process (insertion of transition metal centers into of two supersonic molecular beams that intersect at 90 degrees
H2) are generally small or nonexistent,4a,22 no barrier in excess in the main vacuum chamber. The transition metal atomic beam
of the reaction endoergicity for H2 elimination is indicated in is produced by laser ablation30 from a 0.25 in. diameter rod
Figure 1. The reaction Zr + C2H4 f ZrC2 + 2H2 is endothermic (Alfa 99.9%) that is rotated and translated in front of a
by 47 kcal/mol and thus cannot occur at the collision energies piezoelectric pulsed valve31 delivering an inert carrier gas. The
used in our experiments.28,29 532 nm output (15 mJ, 7 ns, 30 Hz) from a Nd:YAG laser
Using a fast-flow reactor, Carroll and co-workers observed (Continuum Surelite 2) is focused to a 1 mm diameter spot on
that ground-state Zr (a3F2) reactant was depleted by ethylene at the surface of the metal rod. The ablated metal beam, entrained
room temperature on one in every five hard-sphere collisions in carrier gas, passes through a skimmer and then through a
under low-pressure conditions where collisional stabilization of second defining aperture into the main chamber. A mechanical
ZrC2H4 complexes should be negligible.11,13 More recently, the chopper wheel (9 in. diameter, 0.5 mm slot) is spun synchro-
ZrC2H2 reaction product was observed via 157 nm photoion- nously at 210 Hz with the vaporization laser and pulsed valve
ization, mass-selection, and ion detection.14 for additional temporal resolution of the metal atom beam pulse.
C. Nb + C2H4. Calculations show that for the Nb/ethylene The secondary molecular beam source consists of a second
system (Figure 2), the two most stable complexes are a low- piezoelectrically actuated pulsed nozzle which delivers C2H4
spin 4B1 ground-state metallacyclopropane (which correlates to (Matheson, polymer grade, 99.9%), either neat or 20% in
excited quartet atomic states) and a high-spin 6A1 excited state helium.
π-complex (which correlates to the ground sextet atomic states). The entire source assembly can be rotated in a vertical plane
Unlike the case for Zr, these two complexes are very similar in with respect to a fixed detector (Figure 3).25 This is ac-
energy, both being bound by approximately 36 kcal/mol with complished by supporting the source assembly on two rotatable
respect to ground-state reactants.13,18 The equilibrium Nb- bearings with associated differentially pumped 30 in. diameter
ethylene distances are calculated to be 2.07 Å for the 4B1 ground Teflon spring-loaded dynamic seals. In this configuration, a
state and 2.34 Å for the excited 6A1 state.18 pressure (P) of < 2 × 10-6 Torr is maintained in the main
As in the case of Zr, the reaction coordinate leading to chamber of the apparatus with both beams running. Because
Reaction Dynamics of Zr and Nb with Ethylene J. Phys. Chem. A, Vol. 103, No. 19, 1999 3709
Figure 8. ZrC2H2 product TOF spectra (Ecoll ) 13.7 kcal/mol) recorded Figure 10. ZrC2H2 laboratory angular distribution at Ecoll ) 14.0 kcal/
at several laboratory angles using electron impact ionization detection. mol. Lines represent simulation of distribution using T(θ) and P(E) in
Each TOF corresponds to 24 000 laser shots. Figure 11. Solid line corresponds to best simulation of data. Dashed
lines represent a range of acceptable fits.
Downloaded by UNIV NACIONAL AUTONOMA MEXICO on August 31, 2015 | http://pubs.acs.org
Publication Date (Web): April 24, 1999 | doi: 10.1021/jp9846633
out using this method (i.e., using laser “C” in Figure 4).
However, photodepletion of reactive signal was also detected
using electron impact ionization.
The depletion of reactive signal (m/e ) 116) resulting from
crossed beams experiments in which one of the ground spin-
orbit states was depleted was found to be comparable in
magnitude to the total depletion of the corresponding reactant
Zr beam (measured by electron impact ionization). TOF spectra
displaying depletion of reactive signal resulting from the 3F2
ground spin-orbit state are given in the bottom panel of Figure
14. This verifies that the observed reactive signal results
predominantly from reactions of ground state Zr atoms.
D. Nonreactive Zr + C2H4 Scattering at 14.0 kcal/mol.
The nonreactive channel, Zr + C2H4 f Zr + C2H4, in which
Zr reactants are reformed after collision and possible association
with ethylene, was also examined. Collisions that result in the
formation of ZrC2H4 complexes having lifetimes longer than a
rotational period before subsequent reformation of reactants are
expected to produce Zr signal at large laboratory angles,
corresponding to CM angles, Θ, near 180° (Figure 7).34 Zr atom
(m/e ) 90) TOF spectra at laboratory angles of 15°, 20°, and
25° (recorded using 157 nm photoionization) are shown in
Figure 15. The large, slow peak in the TOF at θ ) 15°,
occurring at t ) 175 µs, is due primarily to fragmentation of
product ZrC2H2 in the mass spectrometer. This contribution to
the TOF is simulated using the reactive P(E) and T(Θ) discussed
above (Figure 11). Fragmentation of ZrC2H2 to form Zr is also
observed at θ ) 20°, although only very weakly, because at
this angle, the extreme edge of the reactive Newton circle
(Figure 7) is being sampled. The solid lines in Figure 15 are
thus comprised of two components (shown as dashed lines):
fragmentation of the reactive channel and the nonreactive
channel, which was best simulated using the P(E) and T(Θ)
Figure 13. Simulation of ZrC2H2 laboratory angular distribution. Top shown in Figure 16. The dashed lines in Figure 16 represent
panel shows simulation using optimum P(E). Lower panels show the range of P(E)s that are deemed to adequately model the
simulations using different P(E) distributions which lead to poorer nonreactive signal.
simulation of angular distribution. As expected from the Newton diagram (Figure 7), the Zr TOF
observed TOF data when this field was applied. This was recorded at θ ) 25° has no contribution from fragmentation of
expected because metal cations or positively charged reaction ZrC2H4 reaction products. Two distinct peaks are observed,
products are unable to enter the mass spectrometer because of which correspond to the fast and slow edges of the nonreactive
a large applied positive DC field at the entrance to the mass Zr Newton circle. The slower peak, which corresponds to very
spectrometer ion lenses. Owing to the much greater sensitivity large CM angles, Θ, is more intense than the faster peak. This
Reaction Dynamics of Zr and Nb with Ethylene J. Phys. Chem. A, Vol. 103, No. 19, 1999 3713
Downloaded by UNIV NACIONAL AUTONOMA MEXICO on August 31, 2015 | http://pubs.acs.org
delay, 21% of the Nb beam is depleted. (b) NbC2H2 reactive signal at several laboratory angles using 157 nm photoionization detection. Solid
12° with the depletion laser on (open circles) and off (closed circles). lines are simulations using CM functions given in Figure 21.
With depletion laser set at optimal delay, 22% of the reactive signal is
depleted.
Figure 21. CM distributions used for simulation of NbC2H2 reactive Figure 23. P(E) and T(Θ) for simulation of Nb nonreactive signal
signal from 13.5 kcal/mol data set. Solid line P(E) represents “best (13.5 kcal/mol). Dashed lines in P(E) represent uncertainty in simula-
tion.
Publication Date (Web): April 24, 1999 | doi: 10.1021/jp9846633
not change as a function of collision energy. The T(Θ)s for IV. Discussion
best simulation of nonreactively scattered Nb atoms are also A. Angular Momentum in Nonreactive Scattering. Con-
found to be quite similar for all data sets, sharply peaking at Θ servation of angular momentum through the nonreactive inelastic
) 180° at all collision energies studied. The resulting P(E)s collision is represented by eq 1:
for best simulations of data (reactive and nonreactive) are found
to be stretched or compressed proportionately with increasing L + J ) J* ) L′ + J′ (1)
or decreasing collision energy supplied.
Figure 24 shows the effect of collision energy on the wide- where J and J′ represent the rotational angular momenta of the
angle scattering of Zr and Nb atoms off of C2H4. At all three initial reactant and reformed reactant molecules, respectively.
collision energies shown, TOFs were recorded at laboratory L and L′ are the relative orbital angular momenta of the colliding
angles (θ ) 25° or 30°) where significant backward scattering and recoiling bodies, and J* is the angular momentum of the
in the CM frame (Θ ) 180°) relative to the incoming metal intermediate complex. The efficient rotational cooling of the
atom from decay of long-lived complexes should be evidenced supersonic expansion will leave ethylene with very little average
by an intense slower peak in the TOF spectra. To improve the rotational angular momentum (J < 5p).39 For a colliding pair,
3716 J. Phys. Chem. A, Vol. 103, No. 19, 1999 Willis et al.
by eq 4:
L2
Veff ) V(r) + (4)
2µr2
Publication Date (Web): April 24, 1999 | doi: 10.1021/jp9846633
[ ]( ) C6
( ) C6
1/2 1/6 1/6
3
bmax ) ) 1.375 (5)
22/3 Ecoll Ecoll
|Lmax|
X) (6)
〈M′〉rms
Figure 24. Top: Newton diagram for nonreactive collisions at Ecoll
≈ 14 kcal/mol. Bottom: TOF spectra for Zr and Nb + C2H4 at 14, 9,
and 6 kcal/mol. Note that at 6 kcal/mol, the slower peak disappears in Here, M′ is defined as the projection of J* onto the relative
the Zr system. recoil velocity vector v′ and 〈M′〉rms refers to the root-mean-
the magnitude of the orbital angular momentum (L) is square (rms) average value of M′. For prolate rotors (i.e., Ix )
Iy > Iz) in which the decomposition occurs directly along the
L ) µWb (2) principal axis Iz (v′ || Iz), the rms value of M′ is zero and Xf∞.
where µ is the reduced mass, W is the relative velocity, and b Classically, this results in a T(Θ) with a 1/sin(Θ) form,
the collision impact parameter. To estimate the maximum impact extending to infinity at Θ ) 0° and 180°.34 Decomposition with
parameter that leads to complex formation, we assume a greater rms values of M′ (i.e., smaller values of X), results in a
standard “capture model”.40 Let us examine one particular less sharply peaked T(Θ). A comparison of the T(Θ) used for
system in detail: Nb + C2H4 at 13.5 kcal/mol. The attractive best simulation of our data (Figure 16) to the T(Θ) calculated
long-range interaction potential between the Nb and ethylene from the statistical complex model34 suggests that the Nb +
is approximated by a C6 potential, i.e., C2H4 system decomposes along the principal axis of a prolate
rotor complex with X ) 8((1). Using |Lmax| ) 319p, this yields
C6 〈M′〉rms ) 40 ((5)p. This is consistent with the calculated nearly-
V(r) ) - 6 (3)
r prolate geometry18 of the ground-state NbC2H4 complex, having
with C6 ) 10.6 × 103 Å6 kcal/mole for the Nb/ethylene moments of inertia Ix ) 113 amu‚Å2, Iy ) 95.7 amu‚Å2, and Iz
system.41,42 ) 24.3 amu‚Å2 decomposing to reactant Nb + C2H4 along its
Reaction Dynamics of Zr and Nb with Ethylene J. Phys. Chem. A, Vol. 103, No. 19, 1999 3717
atom lying near the plane of C2H4, indicating that no strong rotational periods. Wide-angle inelastic scattering of atomic M
chemical interaction exists between Zr and the C-C π-bond at resulting from the decay of long-lived MC2H4 complexes was
the transition state for C-H insertion.19 Consequently, the height also observed for both transition metal reactants. For the Zr
of the barrier for direct C-H insertion, without initial formation system, this was only observed for Ecoll g 9.1 kcal/mol,
of a metallacyclopropane, is also likely to lie below the indicating that an adiabatic barrier exists for formation of ZrC2H4
asymptotic energy of the Zr + C2H4 reactants. In this regard it complexes. RRKM calculations modeling the competition
is interesting to note that Stoutland and Bergman45 have studied between decay back to Zr + C2H4 reactants and C-H bond
the reaction (η5-C5Me5)(PMe3)Ir + C2H4 in solution. Their insertion require that the insertion barrier be lower than the
results indicated the involvement of a direct insertion reaction barrier for association. Reaction of Zr atoms at low collision
without the initial formation of a complex, as well as a separate energies via initial formation of ZrC2H4 is likely to be hindered
channel forming complexes. Subsequent extended Hückel by this barrier to association. The Nb reaction can occur at low
calculations suggest that the most favorable approach of the collision energies by initial NbC2H4 complex formation without
metal center for insertion is along the H-C bond axis in a barrier above reactants, which facilitates the spin flip necessary
ethylene.46 Further calculations on the Zr + C2H4 system for C-H bond insertion. At increasing energies, Zr becomes
focusing on transition states for direct C-H bond insertion and the more reactive atom as the barrier for complex formation is
insertion starting from ZrC2H4 would be interesting. surmounted. Alternatively, direct C-H insertion without met-
In the case of the Nb reaction, at the lowest studied collision allocyclopropane formation is fully spin-allowed in the Zr +
Downloaded by UNIV NACIONAL AUTONOMA MEXICO on August 31, 2015 | http://pubs.acs.org
energy of 4.8 kcal/mol, decay of complexes is clearly observed. C2H4 reaction and may play an important role. Our finding that
In addition to reforming reactants, these complexes can readily the barrier for C-H insertion must be below that for ZrC2H4
undergo intersystem crossing and then C-H insertion. Direct formation suggests that such a direct mechanism is in fact likely.
C-H bond insertion by Nb is likely to be inhibited by spin Future experiments include a more quantitative determination
conservation. The intersystem crossing necessary for C-H bond of the branching ratios between nonreaction and reaction as a
Publication Date (Web): April 24, 1999 | doi: 10.1021/jp9846633
insertion by Nb is enhanced by multiple recrossings in the region function of collision energy. These studies, together with careful
of the surface crossing for long-lived NbC2H4 complexes. Such modeling, should facilitate a precise determination of the
complex-mediated spin-forbidden processes in bimolecular potential energy barrier for ZrC2H4 complex formation and may
reactions are well-known, for example, Ba + SO2.47 better assess the role of direct C-H insertion.
Comparison of Nb and Zr Reactivity. At 6 kcal/mol, the
reactivities of Nb and Zr are comparable (Figure 25). However, Acknowledgment. This work was supported by a National
there is a clear trend toward greater reactivity of Nb with Science Foundation Faculty Early Career Development Award,
decreasing collision energies. This trend is in agreement with and by an NSF Equipment Grant. Some of the equipment used
the room-temperature flow-tube result of Carroll et al.13 Under in this work was funded by an ONR Young Investigator Award.
the conditions of their experiment, corresponding to a mean Support by the Exxon Eduational Foundation is also gratefully
collision energy of approximately 0.9 kcal/mol, ground state acknowledged. H.S. thanks the Link Foundation for a Graduate
Nb was depleted by ethylene approximately five times more Fellowship. R.H. thanks the Department of Education for a
efficiently than ground-state Zr (i.e., kdiss/kinsert ) 0.2). The Graduate Fellowship. The authors thank B. Carpenter, J.
greater reactivity of Nb at low collision energies is attributable Weisshaar, S. Klippenstein, and P. Wolczanski for valuable
to the absence of any significant barrier above the ground-state discussions and suggestions.
reactants for complex formation, leading to a large capture cross-
section. Because the C-H insertion barrier for Nb lies below References and Notes
the reactants, a substantial fraction of these complexes go on
(1) Anderson, J. R.; Boudart, M. Catalysis: Science and Technology;
to insertion and H2 elimination. Springer-Verlag: Berlin, 1984; Vol. 6, Chapter 1.
At increasing collision energies, we find that Zr becomes (2) Mathey, F.; Sevin, A. Molecular Chemistry of the Transition Metal
increasingly more reactive than Nb (Figure 25). In the case of Elements; John Wiley & Sons: New York, 1996; pp 189-192.
Zr + C2H4, the presence of an association barrier will lead to (3) Crabtree, R. H. The Organometallic Chemistry of the Transition
Metals; John Wiley & Sons: New York, 1988; pp 267-275.
a large increase in the efficiency of complex formation with
(4) (a) Siegbahn, P. E. M.; Blomberg, M. R. A. In Theoretical Aspects
increasing collision energy. Once complexes are formed, C-H of Homogeneous Catalysis; van Leeuwen, P. W. N. M., Morokuma, K.,
insertion is the dominant fate because of the relatively tight van Lenthe, J. H., Eds.; Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht, 1995; p
transition state for decay back to reactants and the low barrier 15-63. (b) Wittborn, A. M. C.; Costas, M.; Blomberg, M. R. A.; Siegbahn,
P. E. M. J. Chem. Phys. 1997, 107, 4318. (c) Blomberg, M. R. A.; Siegbahn,
for C-H insertion. In the case of Nb + C2H4, because no P. E. M.; Svensson, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 6095. (d) Siegbahn,
association barrier is present, complex formation is efficient even P. E. M. J. Phys. Chem. 1995, 99, 12723. (e) Blomberg, M. R. A.; Siegbahn,
at low collision energies. However, since the transition state P. E. M.; Svensson, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114 (4), 6095. (f) Blomberg,
for decay back to reactants is expected to be looser than for Zr, M. R. A.; Siegbahn, P. E. M.; Nagashima, U.; Wennerberg, J. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1991, 113, 424. (g) Siegbahn, P. E. M. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1993, 205,
a larger fraction of NbC2H4 complexes decay back to reactants. 290.
Note again that direct C-H insertion without initial formation (5) (a) Siegbahn, P. E. M.; Blomberg, M. R. A.; Svensson, M. J. Am.
of ZrC2H4 complexes may play an important role for Zr + C2H4, Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 4191. (b) Siegbahn, P. E. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1993, 115, 5803. (c) Siegbahn, P. E. M. J. Organomet. Chem. 1995, 491,
particularly for small impact parameter collisions where the 231.
barrier for C-H insertion is likely to be considerably smaller (6) Low, J. J.; Goddard, W. A. (a) Organometallics 1986, 5, 609. (b)
than for association (Figure 27). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1984, 106, 8321. (c) J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1984, 106, 6928.
(d) J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1986, 108, 6115.
V. Conclusions (7) (a) Bauschlicher, C. W., Jr.; Langhoff, S. R.; Partridge, H.; Barnes,
L. A. J. Chem. Phys. 1989, 91, 2399. (b) Rosi, M.; Bauschlicher, C. W.,
The reactions of ground-state transition metal (M) atoms Zr Jr.; Langhoff, S. R.; Partridge, J. J. Phys. Chem. 1990, 94, 8656.
(8) (a) Weisshaar, J. C. AdV. Chem. Phys. 1992, 82, 213. (b) Weisshaar,
and Nb with ethylene (C2H4) were studied using the technique J. C. Acc. Chem. Res. 1993, 26, 213.
of crossed molecular beams. Reactions forming MC2H2 + H2 (9) Armentrout, P. B.; Kickel, B. L. Organometallic Ion Chemistry;
involve intermediate complexes with lifetimes longer than their Freiser, B. S., Ed.; Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht, 1996; pp 1-45.
3720 J. Phys. Chem. A, Vol. 103, No. 19, 1999 Willis et al.
(10) Armentrout, P. B. (a) Annu. ReV. Phys. Chem. 1990, 41, 313. (b) (27) Bader, R. F. W.; Gangi, R. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1971, 93, 1831.
Polyhedron 1988, 7, 1573. (c) Science, 1991, 251, 175. (d) Georgiadis, R.; (28) Gupta, S. K.; Gingerich, K. A. J. Chem. Phys. 1981, 74, 3584.
Armentrout, P. B. J. Phys. Chem. 1988, 92, 7060. (29) Chase, M. W., Jr.; Davies, C. A.; Downey, J. R.; Frurip, D. J.;
(11) (a) Carroll, J. J.; Haug, K. L.; Weisshaar, J. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. McDonald, R. A.; Syverud, A. N. J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data, 1981, 13,
1993, 115, 6962. (b) Carroll, J. J.; Weisshaar, J. C. J. Phys. Chem. 1996, Suppl. 1. - JANAF Thermochemical Tables, 3rd ed.
100, 12355. (c) Ritter, D.; Carroll, J. J.; Weisshaar, J. C. J. Phys. Chem. (30) Powers, D. E.; Hansen, S. G.; Geusic, M. E.; Puiu, A. C.; Hopkins,
1992, 96, 10636. J. B.; Dietz, T. G.; Duncan, M. A.; Langridge-Smith P. R. R.; Smalley R.
(12) Carroll, J. J.; Weisshaar, J. C.; Siegbahn, P. E. M.; Wittborn, C. E. J. Phys. Chem. 1982, 86, 2556.
A. M.; Blomberg, M. R. A. J. Phys. Chem. 1995, 99, 14388. (31) Proch D.; Trickl, T. ReV. Sci. Instrum. 1989, 60, 713.
(13) Carroll, J. J.; Hauge, K. L.; Weisshaar, J. C.; Blomberg, M. R. A.; (32) Lee, Y. T.; McDonald, J. D.; LeBreton, P. R.; Herschbach, D. R.
Siegbahn, P. E. M.; Svensson, M. J. Phys. Chem. 1995, 99, 13955. ReV. Sci. Instrum. 1969, 40, 1402.
(14) Wen, Y.; Porembski, M.; Ferrett, T. A.; Weisshaar, J. C. J. Phys. (33) Stauffer, H. U., unpublished.
Chem. A. 1998, 102, 8362. (34) Miller, W. B.; Safron, S. A.; Herschbach, D. R. (a) Discuss. Faraday
(15) (a) Lian, L.; Mitchell, S. A.; Rayner, D. M. J. Phys. Chem. 1994, Soc. 1967, 44, 108. (b) J. Chem. Phys. 1972, 56, 3581.
98, 11637. (b) Brown, C. E.; Mitchell, S. A.; Hackett, P. A. Chem. Phys. (35) Moore, C. E. Atomic Energy LeVels; National Bureau of Stan-
Lett. 1992, 191, 175. dards: Washington DC, 1971.
(16) (a) Mitchell, S. A.; Hackett, P. A. J. Chem. Phys. 1990, 93, 7822. (36) Corliss C. H.; Bozman, W. R. Experimental Transition Prob-
(b) Blitz, M. A.; Mitchell, S. A.; Hackett, P. A. J. Phys. Chem. 1991, 95, abilities; National Bureau of Standards: Washington DC, 1962.
8719. (c) Mitchell, S. A. Gas-Phase Metal Reactions; Fontijn, A., Ed.;
(37) C. R. C. Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 75th ed.; Lide, D.
North-Holland: Amsterdam, 1992; Chapter 12.
R., Ed.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, 1994-1995.
(17) Campbell, M. L. (a) J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans. 1998, 94, 353.
(b) J. Phys. Chem. A. 1998, 102, 892. (c) J. Phys. Chem. A 1997, 101, (38) Levine, R. D.; Bernstein, R. B. Molecular Reaction Dynamics and
Chemical ReactiVity, Oxford University Press: Oxford, 1987; pp 412-
Downloaded by UNIV NACIONAL AUTONOMA MEXICO on August 31, 2015 | http://pubs.acs.org
(21) (a) Widmark, P.; Roos, B. O.; Siegbahn, P. E. M. J. Phys. Chem. 1995.
1985, 89, 2180. (b) Pierloot, K.; Persson B. J.; Roos, B. O. J. Phys. Chem. (42) Cambi, R.; Cappelletti, D.; Liuti, G.; and Pirani, F. J. Chem. Phys.
1995, 99, 3465. 1991, 95, 1852.
(22) Blomberg, M. R. A.; Siegbahn, P. E. M.; Lee, T. J.; Rendell, A. (43) Zhu, L., Hase, W. L. Program #644, Quantum Chemistry Program
P.; Rice, J. E. J. Chem. Phys. 1991, 95, 5898. (b) Blomberg, M. R. A.; Exchange, Indiana University.
Siegbahn, P. E. M.; J. Chem. Phys. 1983, 78, 5682. (44) Yi, S. S.; Blomberg, M. R. A.; Siegbahn, P. E. M.; Weisshaar, J.
(23) Willis, P. A.; Stauffer, H. U.; Hinrichs, R. Z.; Davis, H. F. J. Chem. C. J. Phys. Chem. A 1998, 102, 395.
Phys. 1998, 108, 2665. (45) (a) Stoutland P. O.; Bergman, R. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1985, 107,
(24) Willis, P. A.; Stauffer, H. U.; Hinrichs, R. Z.; Davis, H. F. Laser 4581. (b) Stoutland P. O.; Bergman, R. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1988, 110,
Techniques for State-Selected and State-to-State Chemistry IV; SPIE 5732.
Conference Proceedings, 1998; p 3271. (46) Silvestre, J.; Calhorda, M. J.; Hoffmann, R.; Stoutland, P. O.;
(25) Willis, P. A.; Stauffer, H. U.; Hinrichs, R. Z.; Davis, H. F. ReV. Bergman, R. G. Organometallics, 1986, 5, 1841.
Sci. Instrum., accepted for publication. (47) (a) Smith, G. P.; Zare, R. N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1975, 97, 1985.
(26) (a) Chatt, J.; Duncanson, L. A. J. Chem. Soc. 1953, 2939. (b) Dewar, (b) Freedman, A.; Parr, T. P.; Behrens, R.; Herm, R. R. J. Chem. Phys.
M. J. S. Bull. Soc. Chim. Fr. 1951, 79. 1979, 70, 5251.