Managing Organizational Change Student Name Course Professor Name Date of Submission
Managing Organizational Change Student Name Course Professor Name Date of Submission
Managing Organizational Change Student Name Course Professor Name Date of Submission
Student Name
Course
Professor Name
Date of Submission
2
The current business world is faced with diverse challenges, which permits Management
to changes the processes, job roles and organizational structures. Both competitions and
technological changes which arise from dynamic business environment are the factors towards
the modification of organizational culture. Actually, it is the personnel of the business who
ultimately change how they do their work not organization itself (Armenakis & Harris, 2009,
p.124). If these people do not embrace the new transitional working ideas, the management
and methods for instigating change and helping people to accept and adapt to the change. For
example; Nestle initiated management changes purposely to improve customer base and
productivity. This initiative is deemed successful if workers embrace and adopt the changes
necessary by the initiative, thus delivering expected results. This case study will analyze the
Change Management initiative in relation to the Nestle Management ingenuity and goals.
not possible to change employees. Although, Management actions can inspire employees in their
personal capacity .Change management assists in transforming employees from current states to
future states by assimilating changes as means of development. This does not only creates
benefit to the employees but also the working organization (Bish, et al., 2015, p 535). It is
generally believed that people are naturally resistance to change.Thefore, for change
This means the most single perplexing task most managers face is leading their cause or
diverse products including health and wellness factor has been embracing change management
initiative, with a mission of providing their customers with broad range of nutritious products.
factors which may arise both internally or from external environment. For instance, Nestle
implemented a complete overhaul of its executive board and replace it with ten new executives
in an effort to build companies strength. This initiated the guide for the company’s
organizational changes. Therefore, the critical consideration is company’s goals and mission.
Technology is the key peripheral pressure which call for the management for
changes. The rate of technological change in the business world, influences production and
management techniques. This changes the nature of jobs workings at all the levels of the
which have made a remarkable impact on the functioning of the organizations. Nestle has
adapted Modern technology which has improved productivity as well as minimizing costs. The
effectiveness of the modern technology drives management towards adopting new technological
of acquiring market dominance. Market conditions are usually dynamic. These conditions are in
the process of rapid changes which needs immediate response from the organizational
management. Sales may decline as a result of stiff competition in the market. If business desire
to stay viable in the market it must compete by altering the way it operating or changing the
product line.
4
Customer are the key stakeholder to any business. They directly influence business
success, therefore any complain in relation to how company behave towards customers or
unsatisfied with companies policy can initiate management change. Customers can also apply
compression while denigrating the organization by making frequent complains. To solve these
promotions or transfer can create need for the change intiative.Ideally every leader take along his
own concepts and the way of operation in the company. Relationship especially the casual ones,
changes with the change in ownership positions. The initiation of new philosophies and
may fail to create a viable manageable span of management (Stephen, 2013, p.24). This may
result from numerous management levels, poor coordination and lack of uniformity on policy
formulation amongst the department. However the need for the change may remain unrecognized
Catastrophic events can wipe out a business. These events can enforce business to
organization might be forced to adjust its activities, with an aim of accommodating the new
These factor may influence change management in different levels. To embrace change
amongst the employees, examination of how different people perceive changes important. It
further requires assimilating the awareness on what will help people make successful transitions,
time required for embracing the change and how to train people on demonstrating new behaviors
5
(Davenport & Ronanki, 2018, p.30). It’s only through assimilation of individual change
situations for accepting the change. For example; Nestle could only accept changes depending on
its capability. This capability requires a strategic approach to implant change management
different diagnostic model available for change management. Diagnostic tools allows for a rapid
analysis of the main problem thus helping to deal with a situation stepwise (McFillen,2013,p.
83)Although models of changes follow the similar themes, different models can be used for
different changes.
This model focuses of creating a resistance environment to the factors to change. Although is a
popular organization change mechanism it’s not frequently used due to the competition rates and
nutritious products, any change enforced by the external factors need to assimilated in an effort
of ensuring persistence success in the market. The three step model highlights the need for
organizational norms (Burnes, 2004, p.1000). .This model can used to highlight the forces for
and against the need for change. This is usually important because without identification of a
need for change, people will be reluctant to follow the idea. Change refers to adding in
some articles. These actions are taken in aim of getting organization from the way it was
6
working before. For example, Nestle added article which reflects on the frequent changes in
management in case of persistence loss. This initiated a management model which aims at
assimilating changes depending on the productivity based on the current competition levels.
Nestle decided to change its focus from the local Swiss Market to the other part of the
world such as North America. The Main endeavor during this organizational change phase is the
managers to maintain work balance and operational tranquility by working together with other
organizational members. The current Nestle operations, were carried in a way that the
organization can add some articles depending on the host market adaptability theories. New
Markets are usually embarked with high level of external forces. Assimilation of those forces
creates a room for effective change, in an effort of tapping new customers. In a competitive
behave like change agents and advocates for change. Although this model advocates for
important to consider the organization capability as well as the market share. An evidence based
approach, which refers to the previous change approaches by the leading organization lays a
foundations for existing companies to assimilate in determining the change directions. For
example, The Nokia decline from the market is usually related to management decisions,
These factors delimited Nokia from achieving competitive advantage in the market. The change
of existing organizational management to align company’s competitive level with the current
Kotters eight stage Model is one of the most frequently used tool for managing changes
in the leading organizations across the world (Hackman, 2017). It highlights how organizations
might achieve the selected change process without engaging a lot of financial and human
resources factor. This model is referred as the most modern tool towards achieving best change
clearly the situation leading to change. For example, letting the people within organization
understand the need for the customers. The need to assimilate all the stakeholders in making
Creating a good coalition in a change management is very important. This means creating
change management. For example, good leaders lead by example by encouraging others towards
the change.
emphasizes of achieving a competitive advantage in the market. Without better vision or local
plan an organization can rarely inspire the kind of best action needed to produce a major change.
For instance, Nestle focused on inspiring employees with an aim of limiting resistance to the
changes. In this situation Leaders needed to show leadership qualities of empowering their
followers to perform particular task. These qualities include motivation and communication
qualities.
The organizational internal powers based upon the Managers is the key determinant of
the success level. The pressures to the organizational change can only be challenged by ensuring
The Nestle change created a positive impact on it productivity. Although the result were
adverse in first year of operation, the consisted changes reveals an increase Return in Capital
invested. The real internal growth raised by 2.9% as well as the pricing of about 0.6 percent.
Underlying business earning per share increased by 11.1 percent (Akhtar, Xicang,& Iqbal,
2017,p.230). These stastics embraced the need for organization change in case of lower
Conclusion
The role of any organizational changes management is related to the success of the
organisation.Leaders are required to justify the need for the change, the nature of change and the
challenges likely to happen in case of change (Caldwell,2013,p.30). They are also tasked with
picking the appropriate strategy to implement change and make it acceptable amongst the
organizational members.
Managers should not ignore the role change plays in an organization, therefore they
should dedicate necessary resources to achieve a particular change. By doing this organization
will achieve success both in sales and customer base. Pressures to changes can only be
minimized if there is closer coordination amongst the organization members. The success of
Reference
Armenakis, A.A. & Harris, S.G. 2009, 'Reflections: our journey in organisational change
research and practice', Journal of Change Management, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 127-142.
Bish, A. Newton, C., Johnston, K. 2015. ‘Leader vision and diffusion of HR policy during
Burnes, B. (2004). Kurt Lewin and the planned approach to change: a re‐appraisal. Journal of
Davenport, T. H. & Ronanki, R. 2018, Artificial Intelligence for the Real World, Harvard
Nunes, Paul and Breene, Tim, 2011, ‘Reinvent Your Business Before It’s Too Late’ Harvard
Akhtar, S., Xicang, Z., & Iqbal, S. (2017). Impact of Brand Image on the Profitability of Firm,
Stephen, D., 2013, Ten drivers of radical management in the “creative economy”, Strategy &