Scribd
Upload
414 views14 pages

Gender Analysis and Evaluation Framework

This document appears to be a scoring sheet for assessing gender and development (GAD) elements in a project. It contains 10 categories with multiple items scored on a scale of 0 to 2. The total GAD score for the project development stage based on this assessment is 18. The categories cover issues like involvement of women and men in project design, collection of sex-disaggregated data, gender analysis conducted, gender equality goals, matching strategies to identified gender issues, impact assessment considering women, inclusion of gender targets and indicators, and allocation of resources.

Uploaded by

Manangbiday Udquin
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
414 views14 pages

Gender Analysis and Evaluation Framework

This document appears to be a scoring sheet for assessing gender and development (GAD) elements in a project. It contains 10 categories with multiple items scored on a scale of 0 to 2. The total GAD score for the project development stage based on this assessment is 18. The categories cover issues like involvement of women and men in project design, collection of sex-disaggregated data, gender analysis conducted, gender equality goals, matching strategies to identified gender issues, impact assessment considering women, inclusion of gender targets and indicators, and allocation of resources.

Uploaded by

Manangbiday Udquin
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 14

Done?

Element (col. 2)
and Score for Gender
an item/ issues
item/ques
element* identified
tion No Partly Yes (col. 3) (col. 4)
(col.1) (2a) (2b) (2c)

1.0
Involve
ment of
women
and
men
(max
score: 2;
for each
item, 1)

/ 2
1.1
Participat
ion of
women
and men
in
beneficia
ry groups
in
identifica
tion of
the
problem
(possible
scores: 0,
0.5,
1.0)

/ 1
1.2
Participat
ion of
women
and men
in
beneficia
ry groups
in project
design
(possible
scores: 0,
0.5, 1.0)

/ 1
2.0
Collecti
on of
sex-
disaggr
egated
data
and
gender-
related
informa
tion
(possibl
e scores:
0, 1.0,
2.0)

/ 2
3.0
Conduc
t of
gender
analysis
and
identific
ation of
gender
issues
(max
score: 2;
for each
item, 1)

/ 1
3.1
Analysis
of gender
gaps and
inequaliti
es related
to gender
roles,
perspecti
ves and
needs, or
access to
and
control of
resources
(possible
scores: 0,
0.5, 1.0)

/ 1
3.2
Analysis
of
constrain
ts and
opportuni
ties
related to
women
and
men’s
participat
ion in the
project
(possible
scores:
0, 0.5,
1.0)

/ 1
4.0
Gender
equality
goals,
outcom
es, and
outputs
(possibl
e scores:
0, 1.0,
2.0)
Does
the
project
have
clearly-
stated
gender
equality
goals,
objectiv
es,
outcom
es or
outputs
?

/ 1
Microsoft Word - Expanded box 7 _combined Boxes 5-6 Generic_.doc
Done?
(col. 2)
1

5.0
Matchin
g of
strategi
es with
gender
issues
(possibl
e scores:
0, 1.0,
2.0)
Do the
strategi
es and
activitie
s match
the
gender
issues
and
gender
equality
goals
identifie
d?

6.0 / 0.67
Gender
analysis
of
likely
impacts
of the
project
(max
score: 2;
for each
item,
0.67)
6.1 Are
women
and girl
children
among
the direct
or
indirect
beneficia
ries?
(possible
scores: 0,
0.33,
0.67)
/ 0.33
6.2 Has / 0.67
the
project
considere
d its
long-
term
impact
on
women’s
socioeco
nomic
status
and
empower
ment?
(possible
scores: 0,
0.33,
0.67)
6.3 Has / 0.33
the
project
included
strategies
for
avoiding
or
minimizi
ng
negative
impacts
on
women’s
status
and
welfare?
(possible
scores: 0,
0.33,
0.67)
7.0
Monitor
ing
targets
and
indicato
rs
(possibl
e scores:
0, 1.0,
2.0)
Does
the
project
include
gender
equality
targets
and
indicato
rs to
measure
gender
equality
outputs
and
outcom
es?
8.0 Sex- / 1
disaggr
egated
databas
e
require
ment
(possibl
e scores:
0, 1.0,
2.0)
Does
the
project
M&E
system
require
the
collectio
n of sex-
disaggr
egated
data?

9.0
Resourc
es (max
score: 2;
for each
questio
n, 1)

/ 1
9.1 Is the / 0.5
budget
allotted
by the
project
sufficient
for
gender
equality
promotio
n or
integrati
on? OR,
will the
project
tap
counterp
art funds
from
LGUs/par
tners for
its GAD
efforts?
(possible
scores: 0,
0.5, 1.0)
9.2 Does / 0.5
the
project
have the
expertise
to
promote
gender
equality
and
women’s
empower
ment?
OR, is the
project
committi
ng itself
to invest
project
staff time
in
building
capacitie
s within
the
project to
integrate
GAD or
promote
gender
equality?
(possible
scores: 0,
0.5, 1.0)

10
Relatio
nship
with the
agency’
s
GAD
efforts
(max
score: 2;
for each
questio
n or
item,
0.67)

/ 0.67
10.1 Will / 0.67
the
project
build on
or
strengthe
n the
agency/N
CRFW/
governm
ent’s
commitm
ent to the
empower
ment of
women?
(possible
scores: 0,
0.33,
0.67)
IF THE
AGENCY
HAS NO
GAD
PLAN:
Will the
project
help
towards
the
formulati
on of the
impleme
nting
agency’s
GAD
plan?
10.2 Will
it build
on the
initiative
s or
actions of
other
organizat
ions in
the area?
(possible
scores: 0,
0.33,
0.67)

/ 0.33
10.3 / 0.33
Does the
project
have an
exit plan
that will
ensure
the
sustainab
ility of
GAD
efforts
and
benefits?
(possible
scores: 0,
0.33,
0.67)

TOTAL GAD SCORE FOR


PROJECT DEVELOPMENT
STAGE
18

You might also like