0% found this document useful (0 votes)
77 views3 pages

ILO, 2020a ILO, 2020a

The document summarizes the global impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on work and the workforce. It discusses how the WHO declared COVID-19 a pandemic in March 2020 when there were over 100,000 confirmed cases across 110 countries. To slow the spread, countries instituted lockdowns and travel bans which had wide-ranging economic effects. Millions of workers lost their jobs or had hours cut across many industries from manufacturing to retail to aviation. The document then outlines nine essays on the pandemic's implications for future research on its impact on vocational behavior, marginalized groups, cultural responses, perceptions of occupations, stress and uncertainty, and gig workers. It aims to better understand how shocks like this affect work and workers worldwide.

Uploaded by

Aqib Sheikh
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
77 views3 pages

ILO, 2020a ILO, 2020a

The document summarizes the global impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on work and the workforce. It discusses how the WHO declared COVID-19 a pandemic in March 2020 when there were over 100,000 confirmed cases across 110 countries. To slow the spread, countries instituted lockdowns and travel bans which had wide-ranging economic effects. Millions of workers lost their jobs or had hours cut across many industries from manufacturing to retail to aviation. The document then outlines nine essays on the pandemic's implications for future research on its impact on vocational behavior, marginalized groups, cultural responses, perceptions of occupations, stress and uncertainty, and gig workers. It aims to better understand how shocks like this affect work and workers worldwide.

Uploaded by

Aqib Sheikh
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 3

On March 11, 2020, the World Health Organization declared that COVID-19 was a global

pandemic, indicating significant global spread of an infectious disease.At that point, there
were 118,000 confirmed cases of the coronavirus in 110 countries. China had been the first
country with a widespread outbreak in January, and South Korea, Iran and Italy following in
February with their own outbreaks. Soon, the virus was in all continents and over 177
countries, and as of this writing, the United States has the highest number of confirmed
cases and, sadly, the most deaths. The virus was extremely contagious and led to death in
the most vulnerable, particularly those older than 60 and those with underlying conditions.
The most critical cases led to an overwhelming number being admitted into the intensive
care units of hospitals, leading to a concern that the virus would overwhelm local health
care systems. Today, in early May 2020, there have been nearly 250,000 deaths worldwide,
with over 3,500,000 confirmed cases.The human toll is staggering, and experts are
predicting a second wave in summer or fall.
As the deaths rose from the virus that had no known treatment or vaccine countries shut
their borders, banned travel to other countries and began to issue orders for their citizens
to stay at home, with no gatherings of more than 10 individuals. Schools and universities
closed their physical locations and moved education online. Sporting events were canceled,
airlines cut flights, tourism evaporated, restaurants, movie theaters and bars closed, theater
productions canceled, manufacturing facilities, services, and retail stores closed. In some
businesses and industries, employees have been able to work remotely from home, but in
others, workers have been laid off, furloughed, or had their hours cut. The International
Labor Organization (ILO) estimates that there was a 4.5% reduction in hours in the first
quarter of 2020, and 10.5% reduction is expected in the second quarter (ILO, 2020a). The latter
is equivalent to 305 million jobs (ILO, 2020a).
Globally, over 430 million enterprises are at risk of disruption, with about half of those in
the wholesale and retail trades (ILO, 2020a). Much focus in the press has been on the impact in
Europe and North America, but the effect on developing countries is even more critical. An
example of the latter is the Bangladeshi ready-made-garment sector (Leipheimer et al., 2020), a
global industry that depends on a supply chain of raw material from a few countries and
produces those garments for retail stores throughout North America and Europe. But, in
January 2020, raw material from China was delayed by the shutdown in China, creating
delays and work stoppages in Bangladesh. By the time Bangladeshi factories had the
material to make garments, in March, retailers in Europe and North American began to
cancel orders or put them on hold, canceling or delaying payment. Factories shut down and
workers were laid off without pay. Nearly a million people lost their jobs. Overall, since
February 2020, the factories in Bangladesh have lost nearly 3 billion dollars in revenue. And,
the retail stores that would have sold the garments have also closed. This demonstrates the
ripple effect of the disruption of one industry that affects multiple countries and sets of
workers, because consider that, in turn, there will be less raw material needed from China,
and fewer workers needed there. One need only multiply this example by hundreds to
consider the global impact of COVID-19 across the world of work.
The ILO (2020b) notes that it is difficult to collect employment statistics from different countries,
so a total global unemployment rate is unavailable at this time. However, they predict
significant increase in unemployment, and the number of individuals filing for
unemployment benefits in the United States may be an indicator of the magnitude of those
unemployed. In the United States, over 30 million filed for unemployment between March
11 and April 30 (Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2020), effectively this is an unemployment rate of 18%. By
contrast, in February 2020, the US unemployment rate was 3.5% (Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2020).
Clearly, COVID-19 has had an enormous disruption on work and workers, most critically for
those who have lost their employment. But, even for those continuing to work, there have
been disruptions in where people work, with whom they work, what they do, and how much
they earn. And, as of this writing, it is also a time of great uncertainty, as countries are slowly
trying to ease restrictions to allow people to go back to work--- in a “new normal”, without
the ability to predict if they can prevent further infectious “spikes”. The anxieties about not
knowing what is coming, when it will end, or what work will entail led us to develop this set
of essays about future research on COVID-19 and its impact on work and workers.
These essays began with an idea by Associate Editor Jos Ackerman’s, who noted to me that
the global pandemic was creating a set of career shocks for workers. He suggested writing
an essay for the Journal. The Journal of Vocational Behavior has not traditionally published
essays, but these are such unusual times, and COVID-19 is so relevant to our collective
research on work that I thought it was a good idea. I issued an invitation to the Associate
Editors to submit a brief (3000 word) essay on the implications of COVID-19 on work and/or
workers with an emphasis on research in the area. At the same time, a group of international
scholars was coming together to consider the effects of COVID-19 on unemployment in
several countries, and I invited that group to contribute an essay, as well (Bluestein et al., 2020).
The following are a set of nine thoughtful set of papers on how the COVID-19 could (and
perhaps will) affect vocational behavior; they all provide suggestions for future
research. Ackerman’s, Richardson, and Kramer (2020) explore how the pandemic may be a career shock for
many, but also how that may not necessarily be a negative experience. Bluestein et al. (2020) focus
on global unemployment, also acknowledging the privileged status they have as professors
studying these phenomena. Cho examines the effect of the pandemic on micro-boundaries
(across domains) as well as across national (macro) boundaries (Cho, 2020). Guan, Deng, and Zhou
(2020)
drawing from cultural psychology, discuss how cultural orientations shape an
individual's response to COVID-19, but also how a national cultural perspective influences
collective actions. Kantamneni (2020) emphasized the effects on marginalized populations in the
United States, as well as the very real effects of racism for Asians and Asian-Americans in
the US. Kramer and Kramer (2020) discuss the impact of the pandemic in the perceptions of various
occupations, whether perceptions of “good” and “bad” jobs will change and whether
working remotely will permanently change where people will want to work. Restubog, Ocampo, and
Wang (2020)
also focused on individual's responses to the global crisis, concentrating on
emotional regulation as a challenge, with suggestions for better managing the stress
surrounding the anxiety of uncertainty. Rudolph and Zacher (2020) cautioned against using a
generational lens in research, advocating for a lifespan developmental approach. Spurk and Straub
(2020)
also review issues related to unemployment, but focus on the impact of COVID-19
specifically on “gig” or flexible work arrangements.
I am grateful for the contributions of these groups of scholars, and proud of their ability to
write these. They were able to write constructive essays in a short time frame when they
were, themselves, dealing with disruptions at work. Some were home-schooling children,
some were worried about an absent partner or a vulnerable loved one, some were
struggling with the challenges that Restubog et al. (2020) outlined. I hope the thoughts, suggestions,
and recommendations in these essays will help to stimulate productive thought on the
effect of COVID-19 on work and workers. And, while, I hope this research spurs to better
understand the effects of such shocks on work, I really hope we do not have to cope with
such a shock again.

You might also like