Jurnal 11
Jurnal 11
1 Academy of Scientific and Innovative Research, New Delhi, India, 2 Agrotechnology of Medicinal, Aromatic
and Commercially Important Plants Division, CSIR-Institute of Himalayan Bioresource Technology, Palampur
a1111111111 (HP), India, 3 Natural Product Chemistry and Process Development Division, CSIR-Institute of Himalayan
a1111111111 Bioresource Technology, (Council of Scientific and Industrial Research), Palampur (HP), India
a1111111111
a1111111111 * rakeshkumar@ihbt.res.in
a1111111111
Abstract
A field experiment was conducted at the experimental farm of CSIR-Institute of Himalayan
OPEN ACCESS
Bioresource Technology, Palampur, India for two consecutive years (2015–16 and 2016–
Citation: Thakur M, Bhatt V, Kumar R (2019) Effect
17). The aim of the study was to test the hypothesis whether different shade level and mulch
of shade level and mulch type on growth, yield and
essential oil composition of damask rose (Rosa type would influence the growth, flower yield and essential oil profile of R. damascena. Yield
damascena Mill.) under mid hill conditions of attributes viz., numbers of flowers plant-1, fresh flower weight plant-1, flower yield, and
Western Himalayas. PLoS ONE 14(4): e0214672. essential oil yield were significantly higher under open sunny conditions as compared to
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0214672
25% and 50% shade levels. However, plants grown under 50% shade level recorded signifi-
Editor: Manuel Joaquı́n Reigosa, University of cantly higher plant height (cm), plant spread (cm) and the lowest numbers of branches as
Vigo, SPAIN
compared to control. Among mulches, black polyethylene mulch recorded significantly
Received: November 28, 2018 higher growth, and yield attributes of damask rose as compared to other mulches. Black
Accepted: March 18, 2019 polyethylene mulch recorded 74.5 and 39.2% higher fresh flower yield as compared to with-
Published: April 4, 2019 out mulch, during 2015–16 and 2016–17, respectively. Correlation studies showed a posi-
tively significant correlation between quality and quantity traits. A total of twenty-six
Copyright: © 2019 Thakur et al. This is an open
access article distributed under the terms of the essential oil compounds were identified which accounted for a total of 88.8 to 95.3%. Plants
Creative Commons Attribution License, which grown under open sunny conditions along with the applications of black polyethylene mulch
permits unrestricted use, distribution, and produced a higher concentration of citronellol and trans-geraniol. Damask rose planted in
reproduction in any medium, provided the original
open sunny conditions and mulched with black polyethylene sheet recorded significantly
author and source are credited.
higher flower yield.
Data Availability Statement: All relevant data are
within the paper.
other funding from commercial companies: No reduction [2]. Bulgaria, Turkey, Morocco, Iran, India, Egypt, China, and Russia are known to
salary was received from commercial funding. produce damask rose for producing rose oil, rose water, concrete, attar and absolute [3]. The
URLs to sponsors’ websites: http://www.dst.gov.
price of its essential oil varies from 7 to 10 lakh kg-1 [2]. The quality of essential oil of damask
in. The funders had no role in study design, data
collection and analysis, decision to publish, or rose is due to the high percentage of the monoterpene alcohols such as citronellol, trans-gera-
preparation of the manuscript. niol, linalool, phenyl ethyl alcohol and hydrocarbons such as nonadecene and nonadecane.
The growth and yield of damask rose are affected by agronomic factors viz., nutrient manage-
Competing interests: The authors have declared
that no competing interests exist. ment, varieties, harvesting stage, distillation process, diurnal variability and storage conditions
of flowers.
Light is one of the most important environmental factors for plant growth and development
[4]. Different light intensities influence plant growth, leaf gas exchange, and water use effi-
ciency. In aromatic crops, different light intensities have been demonstrated to alter essential
oil content and composition. The substantial amount of light energy is required to reduce car-
bon which combines with CO2 producing oxygen, carbohydrates, ATP and NADPH. The sug-
ars converted into amino acids, hormones, and secondary metabolites. However, plants grown
under shade level leads to reduce the stomatal conductance, photosynthesis rate, ATP synthe-
sis, carbon assimilation and plant growth [5,6]. The study of microclimate modification by
using different green shade nets found that different crops behaved differently under shade
conditions [7]. These variations in the microclimate modify the rate of CO2 assimilation and
photosynthesis, consequently, crop growth and productivity. Crop yield and productivity can
also be increased by application of mulch in the soil as it improves soil conditions for plant
growth, including soil temperature, soil moisture, weed control, reduction in leaching of fertil-
izers [8]. Mulching is also known to buffer soil temperature, increases early production and
higher yields along with better quality; enhance water and fertilizer use efficiency and decrease
the incidence of pests [9]. Therefore, different types of mulching materials are used to change
the micro environment along with the improvement of crop growth and yield.
Plant acclimation to different light intensities depends on environmental conditions and
plant genotype, and thus is species-specific [10,11]. There is a dearth of information on shade
effect and mulch type for the production of damask rose in the world. Modification of micro-
climate by shade and mulch is an alternative approach to meet the increasing demand of dam-
ask rose under such conditions. However, the effects of shade level and mulch type on R.
damascena have not been studied under Western Himalayan conditions. In view of the above
facts, an experiment was conducted to study the effect of shade level and mulch type on
growth, flower yield, essential oil content, and composition of damask rose under mid hill con-
ditions of Western Himalayas.
Fig 1. Meteorological standard weeks (A) during growing season of damask rose (2015–2016) (B) during growing season of damask rose (2016–2017).
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0214672.g001
exhibited a low availability of nitrogen (49.6 mg/kg of soil), low phosphorous (3.1 mg/kg of
soil) and high potassium (182.2 mg/kg soil). Application of nutrients NPK was applied in the
ratio of 120:60:40 kg/ha through fertilizer urea (46% N), single super phosphate (16% P2O5)
and muriate of potash (60% K2O), respectively. The experiment was laid out in a split plot
design (SPD) with four replications. The agro-shade net houses (shade level) were organized
in main plots, while the different mulches were subjected to sub-plot. Shade houses (3 m height
x 12 m width x 22 m length) were constructed on a 0.2 ha section of an open field at the
Chandpur farm of the institute. Green polypropylene shade fabrics of different mesh gauges
were erected on frames to simulate shade treatments: 25 and 50%. Frames without shade fabric
served as control (i.e., 0% shade). The shade houses were placed on ground cover in the open
field, 2 m a part to prevent treatment overlap.
The experimental area was divided into three blocks to account for any shading effect from
adjacent sides. After pruning of damask rose bushes in the month of December, nine treat-
ments consisting of three shade net houses viz., control (without shade), 25% shade and 50%
shade level were made. Three mulch types viz., control (without mulch), organic mulch at the
rate of 5 t/ha (poplar leaf mulch) and black polyethylene mulch (25/30 micron size) in sub
plots were organized.
190 quantum sensor (LI-COR, Inc., USA). The observations were taken around 8:00 AM to
4:00 PM after each interval of two hours as the sun’s angle to normal (zenith angle) is less than
2˚C on most days of observations. Each reading was expressed as μmol-1m-2s-1.
Fig 2. Photosynthetic Active Radiation (PAR) at different time intervals during flowering season of damask rose.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0214672.g002
Table 1. Effect of shade level and mulch type on growth parameters of damask rose.
Treatment Plant height (cm) Numbers of branches Plant spread (cm) Leaf area index (LAI)
plant-1
N-S E-W
2015–2016 2016–2017 2015–2016 2016–2017 2015–2016 2016–2017 2015–2016 2016–2017 2015–2016 2016–2017
Shade level
Control (0% Shade) 100.3c 119.7c 22.2a 25.3a 93.5c 99.7c 111.2c 116.3 4.0bc 4.8c
b b b ab b ab b ab
25% Shade 125.2 127.4 18.1 23.8 106.9 112.3 127.9 132.6 5.0 6.3ab
a a bc c a a a a
50% Shade 137.4 144.7 16.9 20.6 122.6 118.9 140.4 141.6 5.6 6.6a
SEm± 2.7 1.1 0.5 0.7 0.9 2.8 1.6 3.5 0.3 0.3
LSD (p � 0.05) 9.6 3.7 1.7 2.4 3.2 9.5 5.5 NS 1.1 0.9
Mulch type
Without Mulch 109.0c 121.4c 17.9 21.4bc 104.2b 96.8c 122.2bc 112.2c 4.8 5.5
ab b ab a b a
Organic Mulch 123.1 131.4 19.3 23.7 117.2 113.2 133.7 131.6b 4.9 5.8
Black polyethylene Mulch 129.9a 139.1a 20.0 24.6a 101.5bc 120.9a 123.5b 146.7a 4.8 6.4
SEm± 3.0 1.5 0.9 0.8 2.6 3.2 2.8 10.0 0.2 0.2
LSD (p � 0.05) 8.9 4.5 NS 2.5 7.6 9.4 8.2 11.2 NS NS
Note: N-S: North South; E-W: East West; NS: Not significant; LSD: Least Significant Difference; SEm: Standard Error of Mean;LAI: Leaf area index; Mean values with
same letter in same columns do not differ significantly (p�0.05)
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0214672.t001
productivity by affecting the gas exchange as compared to full sunlight [17]. During both the
years of studies, plant spread (N-S) was significantly higher in 50% shade level as compared to
open sunny conditions (control). Significantly, lowest plant spread was recorded under open
sunny conditions which might be due to higher absorption of PAR, that had enhanced the
photosynthetic rate compared to shaded conditions (Fig 2). The presented data revealed signif-
icantly higher LAI under 50% shade level followed by 25% shade and control, respectively, for
both years of studies. Similar results were observed by modifying the microclimate in S. offici-
nalis to different shade levels resulted in maximum leaf areas when planted in 50% shade
[5,18,19].
Table 2. Effects of shade level and mulch type on yield attributes and yield of damask rose.
Treatment Number of flowers plant-1 Fresh flower weight plant-1 (g) Flower yield (kg ha-1) Essential oil yield (kg ha-1)
2015–2016 2016–2017 2015–2016 2016–2017 2015–2016 2016–2017 2015–2016 2016–2017
Shade level
Control (0% Shade) 186.7a 131.8a 511.3a 381.6a 4544.7a 3392.4a 2.0a 1.5a
b b b ab b ab b
25% Shade 79.2 111.5 230.7 334.2 2050.3 2970.3 0.9 1.4ab
c c c c c c c
50% Shade 34.2 78.7 105.3 207.2 936.1 1841.4 0.4 0.9c
SEm± 5.4 7.2 19.6 44.1 174.1 392.4 0.01 0.08
LSD (p � 0.05) 6.2 8.3 22.6 50.9 200.9 452.7 0.05 0.3
Mulch type
Without Mulch 72.8c 90.1c 203.1c 256.3c 1805.0c 2278.1c 0.8c 1.0c
b b b b b b ab
Organic Mulch 102.1 109.0 289.9 309.7 2576.7 2753.2 1.2 1.3b
a a a a a a a
Black polyethylene Mulch 125.2 122.9 354.3 356.9 3149.4 3172.7 1.4 1.5a
SEm± 11.2 6.5 30.9 44.1 274.3 147.0 0.3 0.2
LSD (p � 0.05) 11.0 6.5 30.6 16.4 271.5 145.5 0.1 0.1
LSD: Interaction (S X M) 19.1 11.2 52.9 28.4 470.3 252.0 0.2 NS
Note: S: Shade; M: Mulch; LSD: Least Significant Difference; SEm: Standard Error of Mean; Mean values with same letter in same columns do not differ significantly
(p�0.05)
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0214672.t002
shade level. This may be due to the higher flower yield and essential oil content under control
and 25% shaded conditions as compared to 50% shade level (Table 2). The production and
quality of essential oil of medicinal and aromatic species responds differently to shade condi-
tions due to genetic makeup and environmental conditions. Essential oil yield of Thymus vul-
garis and Matricaria chamomilla increased under open sunny conditions, however, Ocimum
gratissimum, Anethum graveolens and Pothomorphe umbellate recorded significantly higher
essential oil yield when cultivated under shade [31].
Table 3. Estimate of correlation coefficients at the phenotypic levels for quantitative and quality traits during crop season (Pooled data of two years).
Parameters Fresh flower weightplant-1 Plant height Number of N-S plant E-W plant Leaf area Essential oil Flower yield
(g) (cm) branches plant-1 spread (cm) spread (cm) index content (v/w%) (kg ha-1)
(LAI)
Numbers of flowers 0.99�� -0.69 0.44 -0.59 -0.53 -0.77 0.77� 0.99��
plant-1
Fresh flower weight plant-1 (g) -0.67 0.45 -0.59 -0.51 -0.76 0.77� 0.99��
�� �� ��
Plant height (cm) 0.14 0.88 0.82 0.89 -0.24 -0.67
Numbers of branches plant-1 0.24 0.32 0.20 0.71� 0.45
N-S Plant spread (cm) 0.94�� 0.78� -0.08 -0.59
E-W plant spread (cm) 0.78� -0.10 -0.51
Leaf area index (LAI) -0.33 -0.76
Essential oil content (v/w%) 0.77�
Note
� ��
, , Significant correlation with p values � 0.05, � 0.01, respectively.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0214672.t003
higher positive correlation with flower yield (0.99), essential oil content (0.77), while, showed
positive correlation with numbers of branches plant-1 (0.44). Similar results were observed in
correlation matrix of damask rose in which data revealed that flower yield was significantly
and positively correlated with the number of flower [34]. Plant height (cm) had highly positive
significant correlation for LAI (0.89), N-S plant spread (0.88) and E-W plant spread (0.82),
however, had positive correlation for number of branches plant-1. Numbers of branches plant-
1
produced significant positive correlation for essential oil content (0.71), while, showed posi-
tive correlation for growth and yield attributes. N-S plant spread showed highly significant
positive correlation for E-W plant spread (0.94) and showed significant and positive correla-
tion for LAI (0.78). Likewise, E-W plant spread showed positive correlation for LAI (0.78).
Essential oil content produced significantly higher positive correlation for flower yield (0.77).
Similar results were observed in Tanacetum parthenium, in which positive correlation was
observed between essential oil % and flower yield [35].
Table 4. Effect of shade level and mulch type on essential oil compounds of damask rose (Pooled data of two years).
Area (%)
Treatment Control 25% Shade 50% Shade
Sr. No. Compounds Lit. R.I Exp.R.I WM OM PM WM OM PM WM OM PM
Oxygenated Monoterpene
1 Linalool 1098 1100 1.1±0.5 1.1±0.4 1.5±0.1 0.9±0.0 0.8±0.1 1.3±0.2 1.3±0.3 1.1±0.5 1.2±0.1
2 trans-rose oxide 1106 1115 0.6±0.1 0.6±0.2 0.8±0.1 0.6±0.0 0.5±0.2 0.6±0.1 0.6±0.1 0.5±0.4 0.7±0.0
3 Phenyl ethyl alcohol 1110 1116 0.1±0.1 0.1±0.1 0.1±0.0 0.2±0.1 0.1±0.1 0.1±0.1 0.1±0.0 0.3±0.4 0.2±0.1
4 cis-rose oxide 1111 1118 0.2±0.3 0.1±0.1 0.1±0.1 0.1±0.0 0.3±0.4 0.3±0.4 1.1±0.0 0.1±0.1 0.1±0.1
5 Terpineol 1189 1191 1.1±0.0 1.0±0.3 1.2±0.2 1.0±0.0 0.7±0.3 0.9±0.2 0.7±0.5 1.0±0.1 0.9±0.0
6 Citronellol 1228 1238 40.0±0.0 45.5±8.5 49.2±1.8 40.8±2.0 35.5±9.1 46.4±2.6 43.3±0.6 44.2±1.0 46.5±3.3
7 trans-geraniol 1255 1271 12.6±0.4 13.0±8.6 14.4±4.1 15.1±4.0 15.3±10.3 18.4±1.2 12.8±0.1 15.6±0.3 15.6±3.0
Sub Total 55.7±0.2 61.4±2.6 67.3±0.9 58.7±0.9 53.2±0.4 68.0±0.7 59.9±0.2 62.8±0.4 65.2±0.9
Oxygenated Sesquiterpene
8 Citronellyl acetate 1354 1354 0.8±0.2 0.8±0.1 0.7±0.3 0.5±0.1 0.5±0.1 0.5±0.1 0.6±0.1 0.5±0.0 0.5±0.0
9 Eugenol 1356 1367 0.4±0.1 0.3±0.1 0.3±0.1 0.1±0.0 0.2±0.1 0.2±0.1 0.2±0.0 0.2±0.0 0.2±0.1
10 Geranyl acetate 1383 1383 2.8±0.6 2.4±1.0 2.1±0.6 1.2±0.1 1.2±0.3 1.8±0.8 2.1±1.1 1.0±0.5 1.4±0.6
11 Methyl Eugenol 1401 1401 0.9±0.3 1.0±0.2 0.8±0.1 0.8±0.1 0.7±0.1 0.6±0.0 0.9±0.1 0.8±0.2 0.8±0.1
12 Farnesol 1722 1717 1.4±0.5 1.1±0.0 0.9±0.1 1.3±0.2 1.2±0.5 0.9±0.1 1.2±0.3 1.1±0.5 1.0±0.2
Sub Total 6.3±0.3 5.6±0.3 4.8±0.3 3.9±0.1 3.8±0.2 4.0±0.2 5.0±0.2 3.6±0.2 3.9±0.1
Sesquiterpene Hydrocarbon
13 Elemene 1391 1396 0.9±0.1 0.8±0.2 0.9±0.4 0.6±0.1 0.6±0.1 0.6±0.2 1.4±0.6 0.6±0.0 0.5±0.0
14 Caryophyllene 1404 1420 0.7±0.1 0.9±0.1 0.5±0.1 0.6±0.0 0.6±0.1 0.6±0.0 0.8±0.2 0.6±0.1 0.6±0.0
15 Alpha-guiaene 1439 1435 0.1±0.1 0.3±0.2 0.1±0.0 0.1±0.0 0.0±0.0 0.2±0.1 0.1±0.1 0.3±0.0 0.1±0.1
16 Alpha-humulene 1454 1457 0.9±0.2 1.0±0.1 0.1±0.0 0.8±0.0 0.7±0.0 0.8±0.1 0.9±0.1 0.9±0.1 0.7±0.1
17 Germacrene-D 1480 1482 0.6±0.2 0.6±0.1 0.6±0.1 0.6±0.0 0.6±0.1 0.5±0.0 0.7±0.0 0.6±0.1 0.6±0.0
18 Pentadecane 1500 1500 0.6±0.1 0.7±0.1 0.6±0.1 0.6±0.1 0.7±0.0 0.6±0.1 0.7±0.1 0.5±0.2 0.5±0.0
19 Farnesene 1508 1510 0.2±0.0 0.2±0.0 0.2±0.0 0.2±0.0 0.3±0.0 0.3±0.0 0.3±0.1 0.2±0.0 0.2±0.1
Sub Total 4.0±0.1 4.5±0.1 3.0±0.1 3.5±0.03 3.5±0.04 3.6±0.07 4.9±0.02 3.7±0.07 3.2±0.04
Aliphatic Hydrocarbon
20 Heptadecane 1700 1697 0.1±0.0 0.1±0.0 0.1±0.1 0.1±0.0 0.2±0.1 0.1±0.0 0.1±0.0 0.1±0.0 0.2±0.1
21 Octadecane 1800 1796 0.2±0.1 0.2±0.0 0.1±0.0 0.2±0.0 0.2±0.1 0.1±0.0 0.1±0.1 0.2±0.1 0.1±0.0
22 Nonadecene 1870 1870 3.0±1.0 2.5±0.2 1.6±0.1 3.4±0.2 3.6±2.2 2.1±0.2 2.7±0.5 2.7±0.3 2.5±0.3
23 Nonadecane 1900 1895 14.5±5.8 12.6±0.2 8.9±0.1 14.2±1.9 15.1±7.5 9.2±0.8 10.3±3.3 10.9±4.0 9.5±1.1
24 Eicosane 2000 2002 1.4±0.6 1.4±0.1 0.9±0.1 1.5±0.0 1.7±1.0 1.0±0.2 1.0±0.3 1.1±0.2 1.0±0.0
25 Heneicosane 2100 2096 6.6±3.2 6.1±0.2 3.8±0.4 7.1±0.4 8.7±5.2 4.8±1.1 4.6±1.6 5.5±1.0 4.9±0.1
26 Tricosane 2300 2298 1.3±0.8 1.3±0.2 0.7±0.0 1.7±0.2 2.3±1.4 1.1±0.3 0.8±0.5 1.3±0.2 1.1±0.1
Sub Total 27.1±1.6 24.2±0.1 16.1±0.1 28.2±0.4 31.8±2.5 18.4±0.4 19.6±0.9 21.8±0.8 19.3±0.2
Total 92.8±3.9 95.3±0.6 91.4±0.1 94.0±0.9 91.9±2.0 93.6±2.1 88.8±3.5 91.8±2.2 91.1±0.3
Note: WM: Without Mulch; OM: Organic Mulch; PM: Black polyethylene Mulch; ± values represents standard deviation of three replicates.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0214672.t004
followed by organic and without mulch. This may be because of biosynthetic activation of
pathways of essential oils due to light which depend on the carbon chain obtained by photo-
synthetic light [10]. The remaining compounds did not showed any consistent trend under
shade levels and mulch types. The variation in the compounds of damask rose essential oil
may be related both to the availability of light and favorable soil temperature and soil moisture,
since the quality of essential oil is determined by favorable environmental conditions in the
productivity of secondary metabolites of essential oil crops [36].
Fig 3. Loading plot of principal component analysis (A) loading plot PC-1 (B) loading plot PC-2.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0214672.g003
Fig 4. Principal component analysis of essential oil compounds data. Principal component 1 and Principal component 2 jointly explained 76.9% of the
total variation. 0%, 25% and 50% are the shade levels, respectively, while WM, OM, PM are the mulch types viz., without mulch, organic mulch and black
polyethylene mulch, respectively.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0214672.g004
4. Conclusions
Applications of ‘‘different shade levels and mulch types” influenced the growth, yield attributes
and quality of essential oil of damask rose under the mid hill conditions of Western Himalayas.
The open sunny conditions and black polyethylene mulch promotes the production of major
secondary metabolites of damask rose. Since the adaptation of plants to shaded conditions
have reduced the yield attributes, hence from the studies we concluded that plants grown
under open sunny condition with black polyethylene mulch produced higher yield and good
quality of damask rose.
Table 5. Clusters variability in major essential oil constituents (%) of damask rose as affected by shade level and mulch type.
Sr. No. Components Cluster 1 Cluster II Cluster III Cluster IV
1 Citronellol 49.2 44.2–47.1 35.5–40.8 40.0–45.5
2 Trans-Geraniol 14.4 15.6–18.1 15.1–15.3 12.6–13.0
3 Geranyl acetate 2.1 1.0–1.6 1.2 1.7–2.8
4 Nonadecene 1.6 2.0–2.7 3.4–3.6 2.5–3.0
5 Nonadecane 8.9 9.0–10.9 14.2–15.1 11.3–14.5
6 Heneicosane 3.8 4.5–5.5 7.1–8.7 5.0–6.6
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0214672.t005
Acknowledgments
The authors are grateful to the Director, CSIR-IHBT, Palampur, (HP), India for providing nec-
essary facilities during the course of study. We also thank Mr. Kuldeep Singh, Mr. Ramdeen
Prasad and Mr. Shiv Kumar for their technical support. This is IHBT publication number
4323.
Author Contributions
Data curation: Vinod Bhatt.
Formal analysis: Meenakshi Thakur.
Supervision: Rakesh Kumar.
Validation: Vinod Bhatt, Rakesh Kumar.
Writing – original draft: Meenakshi Thakur.
Writing – review & editing: Rakesh Kumar.
References
1. Achuthan CR, Babu BH, Padikkala J. Antioxidant and hepatoprotective effects of Rosa damascena.
Pharmaceutical Biology. 2003; 41(5):357–361.
2. Gorji-Chakespari A, Nikbakht AM, Sefidkon F, Ghasemi-Varnamkhasti M, Brezmes J, Llobet E. Perfor-
mance comparison of fuzzy ARTMAP and LDA in qualitative classification of Iranian Rosa damascena
essential oils by an electronic nose.Sensors. 2016; 16(5):636. https://doi.org/10.3390/s16050636
PMID: 27153069
3. Karami A, Khosh-Khui M, Salehi H, Saharkhiz MJ, Rowshan V. Headspace analysis of floral scent from
two distinct genotypes of Iranian damask rose (Rosa damascena Mill.). Journal of Essential Oil Bearing
Plants. 2013; 16(4):489–498.
4. Hatamian M, Arab M, Roozban MR. Stomatal behavior of two rose cultivar under different light intensi-
ties. Journal of Agriculture Crops Production. 2015; 17(1):1–11.
5. Rezai S, Etemadi N, Nikbakht A, Yousefi M, Majidi MM. Effect of light intensity on leaf morphology, pho-
tosynthetic capacity, and chlorophyll content in sage (Salvia officinalis L.).Horticultural Science and
Technology. 2018; 36(1):46–57.
6. Kumar R, Sharma S, Pathania V. Effect of shading and plant density on growth, yield and oil composi-
tion of clary sage (Salvia sclarea L.) in North Western Himalaya. Journal of Essential Oil Research.
2013; 25(1):23–32.
7. Shao Q, Wang H, Guo H, Zhou A, Huang Y, Sun Y, et al. Effects of shade treatments on photosynthetic
characteristics, chloroplast ultrastructure, and physiology of Anoectochilusroxburghii. Plos One. 2014;
9(2):1–10.
8. Bohra M. Kumar S. Singh CP. Effect of mulch materials on growth parameters of rose (Rosa spp.) cv.
"Laher".International Journal of Basic and Applied Agricultural Research. 2015; 13(2):156–161.
9. Rathinasabapathi B, Ferguson J, Gal M. Evaluation of allelopathic potential of wood chips for weed sup-
pression in horticultural production systems. Hort Science. 2005; 40(3):711–713.
10. Fadil M, Farah A, Ihssane B, Haloui T, Lebrazi S, Zghari B, et al. Chemometric investigation of light-
shade effects on essential oil yield and morphology of Moroccan Myrtus communis L. Springer Plus.
2016; 5:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40064-015-1659-2
11. Shrestha A, Cole JC. Shade intensity influences water use and growth of three Viburnum species. Jour-
nal of Environmental Horticulture. 2013; 31(4):259–266.
12. Stein SE. Mass spectral database software, version 3.02. Gaithersburg, MD: National Institute of Stan-
dards and Technology. 2005.
13. Adams PR. Identification of essential oil components by gas chromatography/mass spectroscopy, 4th
ed. Allured Publishing Corporation, 336 Gundersen Drive, Suite A Carol Stream, IL, USA;
1995:60188–62403.
14. Kumar V, Swamy KN, Vardhini BV, Rao SSR. Effect of light curtailment on growth, biochemical
response and essential oil content of rose scented geranium. International Journal of Multidisciplinary
and Current Research. 2014; 2:322–326.
15. Haque MM, Hasanuzzaman M, Rahman ML. Effect of light intensity on morpho-physiology and yield of
bottle gourd (Lagenaria vulgaris). Academic Journal of Plant Sciences. 2009; 2(3):158–161.
16. Gregoriou K, Pontikis K, Vemmos S. Effects of reduced irradiance on leaf morphology, photosynthetic
capacity, and fruit yield in olive (Olea europaea L.). Photosynthetica. 2007; 45(2):172–181.
17. Kumar R, Sharma S, Ramesh K, Pathania V, Prasad R. Irradiance stress and plant spacing effect on
growth, biomass and quality of wild marigold (Tagetes minuta L.)–An industrial crop in Western Hima-
laya. Journal of Essential Oil Research. 2014; 26(5):1–10.
18. Lambers H, Stuart Chapin F, Pons TL. Plant physiological ecology. Springer Verlag, New York. 1998.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-2855-2
19. Taiz L, Zeiger E. Plant Physiology. 4th ed., Sinauer Associates Inc., Sunderland, Massachusetts,
USA, 2006: 764.
20. Silva AC, Blank AF, Santos WM, Prata PS, Alves PB, Arrigoni-Blank MF. Fertilization and colors of plas-
tic mulch affect biomass and essential oil of Sweet-scented geranium. The Scientific World Journal.
2014:1–7.
21. Kumar R, Sood S, Sharma S, Kasana RC, Pathania VL, Singh B, et al. Effect of plant spacing and
organic mulch on growth, yield and quality of natural sweetener plant stevia and soil fertility in Western
Himalayas. International Journal of Plant Production. 2014; 8(3):311–334.
22. Hatamian M, Salehi H. Physiological characteristics of two rose cultivars (Rosa hybrid L.) under differ-
ent levels of shading in greenhouse conditions. Journal of Ornamental Plants. 2017; 7(3):147–155.
23. Souri MK. Effectiveness of chloride compared to 3, 4-dimethylpyrazole phosphate on nitrification inhibi-
tion in soil. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis. 2010; 41(14):1769–1778.
24. Chawla SL. Response of African marigold to irrigation and mulching. Journal of Ornamental Horticul-
ture. 2008; 11(2):131–135.
25. Li Q. Effects of Light Quality on Growth and Phytochemical Accumulation of Lettuce and Salvia Miltior-
rhiza Bunge; Northwest A & F University: Xianyang, China, 2010.
26. Baroli I, Price GD, Badger MR, Von Caemmerer S. The contribution of photosynthesis to the red light
response of stomatal conductance. Plant Physiology. 2008; 146:737–747. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.
107.110924 PMID: 18065555
27. Bondada BR, Syvertsen JP. Leaf chlorophyll, net gas exchange and chloroplast ultrastructure in citrus-
leaves of different nitrogen status. Tree Physiology. 2003; 23(8):553–559. PMID: 12730047
28. Kumar R, Sharma S, Pathania V. Effect of shading and plant density on growth, yield and oil composi-
tion of clary sage (Salvia sclarea L.) in North Western Himalaya. Journal of Essential Oil Research.
2013; 25(1):23–32.
29. Gregoriou K, Pontikis K, Vemmos SN. Effects of reduced irradiance on leaf morphology, photosynthetic
capacity, and fruit yield in olive (Olea europaea L.). Photosynthetica. 2007; 45(2):172–181.
30. Wei SL, Wang WQ, Chen XH, Qin S.Y and Chen XT. Studies on the shade-endurance capacity of Gly-
cyrrhiza uralensis. China Journal of Chinese Materia Medica. 2005; 30(2):100–104. PMID: 15714809
31. Ade-Ademilua EO, Obi HO, Craker LE. Growth and essential oil yield of African basil, Ocimum gratissi-
mum, under light and water stress. Journal of Medicinally Active Plants. 2013; 1(4): 143–149.
32. Mattana RS, Vieira MAR, Marchese JA, Ming LC, Marques MOM. Shade level effects on yield and
chemical composition of the leaf essential oil of Pothomorphe umbellata (L.) Miquel. Scientia Agricola.
(Piracicaba, Braz.) 2010; 67(4):414–418.
33. Bajad AA, Sharma BP, Gupta YC, Dilta BS, Gupta RK. Effect of different planting times and mulching
materials on flower quality and yield of China aster cultivars. Journal of Pharmacognosy Phytochemis-
try. 2017; 6(6):1321–1326.
34. Pal PK, Mahajan M. Pruning system and foliar application of MgSO4 alter yield and secondary metabo-
lite profile of Rosa damascena under rainfed acidic conditions. Frontiers in Plant Sciences. 2017; 8:1–
13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.00507 PMID: 28446915
35. Alizadeh MA, Jafari AA, Sayedian SE. Evaluation of aerial biomass yield and essential oil content of
seven species of Tanacetum. Journal of Horticultural Research. 2017; 25(1):19–25.
36. Fernandes VF, de-Almeida LB, Feijo EV\RS, Silva DC, Oliveira RA, Mielke MS, et al. Light intensity on
growth, leaf, micromorphology and essential oil production of Ocimum gratissimum. Brazilian Journal of
Pharmaceutical Sciences 2013; 23(3):419–424.