Fever Management in ICU Patients
Fever Management in ICU Patients
Fever is a common problem in ICU patients. The presence of fever frequently results in the
performance of diagnostic tests and procedures that significantly increase medical costs and
expose the patient to unnecessary invasive diagnostic procedures and the inappropriate use of
antibiotics. ICU patients frequently have multiple infectious and noninfectious causes of fever,
necessitating a systematic and comprehensive diagnostic approach. Pneumonia, sinusitis, and
blood stream infection are the most common infectious causes of fever. The urinary tract is
unimportant in most ICU patients as a primary source of infection. Fever is a basic evolutionary
response to infection, is an important host defense mechanism and, in the majority of patients,
does not require treatment in itself. This article reviews the common infectious and noninfectious
causes of fever in ICU patients and outlines a rational approach to the management of this
problem. (CHEST 2000; 117:855– 869)
Key words: cytokines; fever; ICU; sinusitis; urinary tract infection; ventilator-associated pneumonia
Abbreviations: CDC ⫽ Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; CFU ⫽ colony-forming units; ELISA ⫽ enzyme-
linked immunosorbent assay; IL ⫽ interleukin; TNF ⫽ tumor necrosis factor; UTI ⫽ urinary tract infection;
VAP ⫽ ventilator-associated pneumonia
856 Reviews
IL-6, and TNF-␣ will result in the development of be considered in ICU patients are listed in Table
fever. While infections are the commonest cause of 1.1,55,66 – 68 For reasons that are not entirely clear,
fever in ICU patients, many noninfectious inflamma- most noninfectious disorders usually do not lead to a
tory conditions cause the release of the proinflam- fever ⬎ 38.9°C (102°F); therefore, if the tempera-
matory cytokines with a febrile response.55– 61 Simi- ture increases above this threshold, the patient
larly, it is important to appreciate that not all patients should be considered to have an infectious etiology
with infections are febrile. Approximately 10% of as the cause of the fever.67 However, patients with
septic patients are hypothermic and 35% are normo- drug fever may have a temperature ⬎ 102°F.69 –71
thermic at presentation. Septic patients who fail to Similarly, fever secondary to blood transfusion may
develop a temperature have a significantly higher be ⬎ 102°F.72,73
mortality than febrile septic patients.62– 64 The reason Most of those clinical conditions listed in Table 1
that patients with established infections fail to de- are clinically obvious and do not require additional
velop a febrile response is unclear; however, prelim- diagnostic tests to confirm their presence. However,
inary evidence suggests that this aberrant response is a few of these disorders require special consider-
not due to diminished cytokine production.65 ation. Although drug-induced fever is commonly
The presence of fever in an ICU patient fre- cited as a cause of fever,74 ⬍ 300 cases of this
quently triggers a battery of diagnostic tests that are condition have been reported in the literature.70
costly, expose the patient to unnecessary risks, and Furthermore, only a single case of drug fever has
often produce misleading or inconclusive results. It been reported in an ICU patient population.1 How-
is therefore important that fever in ICU patient be ever, on the basis of the number of medications
evaluated in a systematic, prudent, clinically appro- administered to patients in the ICU, one would
priate, and cost-effective manner. expect drug fever to be a relatively common event.
Although the true incidence of this disorder is
unknown, drug fever should be considered in pa-
Noninfectious Causes of Fever in the ICU tients with an otherwise unexplained fever, particu-
larly if they are receiving -lactam antibiotics, pro-
A large number of noninfectious disorders result cainamide, or diphenylhydantoin.70 Drug fever is
in tissue injury with inflammation and a febrile usually characterized by high spiking temperatures
reaction. Those noninfectious disorders that should and shaking chills.70 It may be associated with a with
leukocytosis and eosinophilia. Relative bradycardia,
although commonly cited, is uncommon.67,70,74
Table 1—Noninfectious Causes of Fever in the ICU Atelectasis is commonly implicated as a cause of
Noninfectious Causes
fever. Standard ICU texts list atelectasis as a cause of
fever, although they provide no primary source.51,75
Alcohol/drug withdrawal Indeed a major surgery text states that “fever is
Postoperative fever (48 h postoperative)
Posttransfusion fever
almost always present [in patients with atelecta-
Drug fever sis].”51 However, Engeron76 studied 100 postopera-
Cerebral infarction/hemorrhage tive cardiac surgery patients and was unable to
Adrenal insufficiency demonstrate a relationship between atelectasis and
Myocardial infarction fever. Furthermore, when atelectasis is induced in
Pancreatitis
Acalculous cholecystitis
experimental animals by ligation of a mainstem
Ischemic bowel bronchus, fever does not occur.77,78 However, Kisala
Aspiration pneumonitis and coworkers79 demonstrated that IL-1 and TNF-␣
ARDS (both acute and late fibroproliferative phase) levels of macrophage cultures from atelectatic lungs
Subarachnoid hemorrhage were significantly increased compared with the con-
Fat emboli
Transplant rejection
trol lungs. The role of atelectasis as a cause of fever
Deep venous thrombosis is unclear; however, atelectasis probably does not
Pulmonary emboli cause fever in the absence of pulmonary infection.
Gout/pseudogout Febrile reactions complicate about 0.5% of blood
Hematoma transfusions, but may be more common following
Cirrhosis (without primary peritonitis)
GI bleed
platelet transfusion.72,80,81 Antibodies against mem-
Phlebitis/thrombophlebitis brane antigens of transfused leukocytes and/or plate-
Adrenal insufficiency lets are responsible for most febrile reactions to
IV contrast reaction cellular blood components.72 Febrile reactions usu-
Neoplastic fevers ally begin within 30 min to 2 h after a blood-product
Decubitus ulcers
transfusion is begun. The fever generally lasts be-
858 Reviews
CDC may, however, not be applicable to ICU The optimal technique(s) for diagnosis of VAP re-
patients.109,110 For example, according to the most mains unclear as a uniformly agreed on “gold stan-
recent definitions published in 1988, the presence of dard,” for the diagnosis is lacking.111,118,124,133–135
rales and purulent sputum or the presence of new The impact that diagnostic tests for VAP have on
chest radiographic findings and change in sputum patient outcome is controversial. Using a decision
character were used to diagnose pneumonia.110 In analysis method, Sterling and coauthors136 demon-
patients receiving mechanical ventilation, less than a strated that invasive or semi-invasive microbiological
third of patients with these features would be con- diagnostic techniques improved the outcome of pa-
sidered to have pneumonia using invasive diagnostic tients with suspected VAP. However, Luna and
methods.111–114 Similarly, fever and a urine culture colleagues137 and Rello and coworkers138 have dem-
of ⱖ 105 colony-forming units (CFU)/mL was con- onstrated that the most important factor affecting
sidered diagnostic of urinary tract infection. As is outcome in patients with VAP is the early initiation
discussed below, the presence of these two finding in of appropriate antibiotic therapy. In the study by
catheterized critically ill ICU patients does not rep- Luna et al,137 the mortality of patients who were
resent infection of the urinary tract. changed from inadequate antibiotic therapy to ap-
The most common infections reported in ICU pa- propriate therapy based on the results of the BAL
tients are pneumonia, followed by sinusitis, blood was comparable to the mortality of those patients
stream infection, and catheter-related infection.1,102–108 who continued to receive inadequate therapy. Kollef
Table 2 lists the most important sites of infection in and Ward,139using noninvasive mini-BAL to diag-
ICU patients. As is discussed below, urinary tract nose VAP, confirmed these findings. It should how-
infection is probably unimportant in most ICU pa- ever be noted that patients who have clinical features
tients. of VAP and in whom VAP is “excluded” based on
quantitative culture of lower respiratory tract secre-
tions and in whom antibiotics are stopped have a
Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia significantly lower mortality than those patient who
are culture positive.121,139 Invasive or noninvasive
Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) occurs in sampling of lower respiratory tract sections with
approximately 25% of patients undergoing mechan- quantitative culture therefore allows for the safe
ical ventilation.49,115–118 The impact of VAP on pa- discontinuation of antibiotics in the “culture nega-
tient outcome has been much debated117,119,120; tive” patients.123,125,140 –145 Furthermore, as the ini-
however, Fagon and colleagues121 reported an attrib- tial empiric antibiotic regimen must be broad and
utable mortality of 27%. The optimal management of cover both Gram-positive and negative organisms,
patients with suspected VAP requires confirmation these techniques allow for narrowing of the spec-
of the diagnosis and identification of the responsible trum once a pathogen has been isolated in those
pathogen(s) in order to provide appropriate antimi- patients with confirmed pneumonia. This approach
crobial therapy. The diagnosis of VAP remains one of to suspected VAP will result in significant cost savings
the most difficult clinical dilemmas in critically ill and reduce the selection of resistant organisms.113
patients receiving mechanical ventilation.49 Clinical
criteria alone have been shown to be unreliable in
the diagnosis of this condition.113,115,122 A number of
invasive and minimally invasive techniques have Sinusitis
been reported to aid in the diagnosis of VAP. The Because paranasal sinusitis is usually clinically
number of methods currently available attest to the silent in intubated patients, it is not widely appreci-
fact that no single method is ideal.49,112,120,123–132 ated that nosocomial sinusitis is an important source
of infection and fever in critically ill patients. Fur-
thermore, many ear, nose, and throat surgeons are of
Table 2—Common Infectious Causes of Fever in the the belief that paranasal sinusitis in intubated pa-
ICU tients receiving mechanical ventilation does not
Infectious Causes cause fever or systemic signs of infection. Nosoco-
mial sinusitis is particularly common following nasal
VAP
Sinusitis
intubation, with an incidence of up to 85% after a
Catheter-related sepsis week of intubation.146 –151 The incidence of nosoco-
Primary Gram-negative septicemia mial sinusitis appears to be lower in patients in
C difficile diarrhea whom both the endotracheal and gastric tubes are
Abdominal sepsis placed orally.146 –151 The diagnosis of sinusitis re-
Complicated wound infections
quires a CT scan and cannot be accurately assessed
860 Reviews
catheter for monitoring fluid balance and renal nous colitis is the most dramatic manifestation of C
function. The patients’ colonic flora rapidly colonizes difficile infection; these patients have marked ab-
the urinary tract in these patients.178 Stark and dominal and systemic signs and symptoms and may
Maki179 have demonstrated that in catheterized pa- develop a fulminant and life-threatening colitis.
tients, bacteria in the urinary system rapidly prolif- Stool assay for toxins A or B are the main clinical
erate to exceed 105 CFU/mL over a short period of tests used to diagnose C difficile infection.190 –192 The
time. Bacteriuria, defined as a quantitative culture of “gold standard” test is the tissue culture cytotoxicity
ⱖ 105 CFU/mL, has been reported in up to 30% assay. This test has a high sensitivity (94 to 100%)
of catheterized hospitalized patients.180 The terms and specificity (99%). The major disadvantages of
“bacteriuria” and “UTI” are generally although in- this test are its high expense and the time needed to
correctly used as synonyms. Indeed, most studies in complete the assay (2 to 3 days). For these reasons,
ICU patients have used bacteriuria to diagnose a
this test is no longer routinely performed. Toxin
UTI. Bacteriuria implies colonization of the urinary
enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) tests
tract without bacterial invasion and an acute inflam-
are less sensitive (70 to 90%) than the cytotoxicity
matory response.181 UTI implies an infection of the
urinary tract.181 Criteria have not been developed for test, but demonstrate excellent specificity (99%) and
differentiating asymptomatic colonization of the uri- can be rapidly processed, and have largely replaced
nary tract from symptomatic infection. Furthermore, the cytotoxicity assay.190 –192 It is suggested that two
the presence of white cells in the urine is not useful stool specimens be examined for leukocytes and
for differentiating colonization from infection, as toxin ELISA test.190 Should the ELISA be negative
most catheter-associated bacteriurias have accompa- and a high index of suspicion for C difficile exist, the
nying pyuria.182 It is therefore unclear how many following are recommended: (1) sigmoidoscopy,
catheterized patients with ⬎ 105 CFU/mL actually and/or (2) cytotoxicity assay, and/or (3) CT scan of
have UTI. abdomen looking for thickened colonic wall.
While catheter-associated bacteruria is common in
ICU patients, data for the early 1980s indicates that
⬍ 3% of catheter-associated bacteriuric patients will Candida Infections
develop bacteremia caused by organisms in the
urine.183 Therefore, the surveillance for and treat- Candida species are important opportunistic
ment of isolated bacteruria in most ICU patients is pathogens in the ICU. The CDC National Nosoco-
currently not recommended.184 Bacteriuria should, mial Infection Study reported that 7% of all nosoco-
however, be treated following urinary tract manipu- mial infections were due to candidal species.193 In
lation or surgery, in patients with kidney stones, and the EPIC study,104 17% of nosocomial ICU infec-
in patients with urinary tract obstruction. tions were due to fungi. Candida infections should
be considered in febrile ICU patients who have been
in the ICU for ⬎ 10 days and have received multiple
CLOSTRIDIA DIFFICILE Colitis courses of antibiotics.53 Candida species are partic-
ularly important pathogens in patients with ongoing
C difficile, the agent that causes pseudomembra- peritonitis.52–54 It is important to realize that Can-
nous colitis and antibiotic-associated diarrhea, has dida species are constituents of the normal flora in
become a common nosocomial pathogen.185–187 Ap- about 30% of all healthy people. Antibiotic therapy
proximately 20% of all hospitalized patients become increases the incidence of colonization by up to
“infected” with C difficile, of whom only about a 70%.53 It is probable that most ICU patients become
third develop diarrhea.185–187 The majority of hospi- colonized with Candida species soon after admission.
tal inpatients infected with C difficile are asymptom- Not all patients colonized with Candida will become
atic.188,189 C difficile infection commonly presents infected with Candida. Nonneutropenic patients
with mild to moderate diarrhea, sometimes accom- with isolation of Candida species from pulmonary
panied by lower abdominal cramping. Symptoms samples (tracheal aspirates, bronchoscopic or blind
usually begin during or shortly after antibiotic ther- sampling methods), even in high concentrations, are
apy but are occasionally delayed for several weeks. unlikely to have invasive candidiasis.194,195 Indication
Severe colitis without pseudomembrane formation for initiation of antifungal therapy in these patients
may occur with profuse, debilitating diarrhea, ab- should be based on histologic evidence or identifica-
dominal pain, and distension. Common systemic tion from sterile specimens. Similarly, isolation of
manifestations include fever, nausea, anorexia, and Candida species from the urine in ICU patients with
malaise. A neutrophilia and increased numbers of indwelling catheters usually represents colonization
fecal leukocytes are common.188,189 Pseudomembra- rather than infection. Although candiduria may be
Diagnostic Evaluation
Scintigraphy, CT Scanning, and Ultrasound
It is important that blood cultures as well as other Examinations
appropriate cultures be performed before the initi-
ation of antibiotic therapy. The impact of antibiotic Scintigraphic scanning techniques have a low sen-
therapy on culture positivity is illustrated in patients sitivity and specificity in ICU patients and are there-
with suspected VAP, where a number of studies have fore not recommended.1,211,212 The advantages of
demonstrated that both prior and current antibiotic CT scanning and/or ultrasound over scintigraphy is
therapy reduces the predictive accuracy of invasive that the results of the test can be obtained immedi-
diagnostic testing. 198,199 ately with superior anatomic resolution, which can
be used to guide drainage procedures.
Blood Cultures
An Approach to the Critically Ill Patient
Bacteremia and candidemia have been docu- With Fever
mented in up to 10% of ICU patients and are an
important cause of morbidity and mortality in the From the forgoing information, the following ap-
ICU.200 –203 Blood cultures are therefore indicated in proach is suggested in ICU patients who develop a
all febrile patients. Surveillance blood cultures, how- fever (see Fig 1). Due to the frequency and excess
ever, are expensive and add very little to the man- morbidity and mortality associated with bacteremia,
agement of patients in the ICU.204 blood cultures are recommenced in all ICU patients
Bennett and Beeson205 reported that the presence who develop a fever. A comprehensive physical
of microorganisms in the blood is the initiating event examination and review of the chest radiograph is
leading to fever and chills 1 to 2 h later, and that essential. Noninfectious causes of fever should be
blood cultures are frequently negative at the time of excluded. In patients with an obvious focus of infec-
the temperature spike. Thus blood cultures are tions (eg, purulent nasal discharge, abdominal ten-
ideally drawn prior to the onset of a temperature derness, profuse green diarrhea), a focused diagnos-
spike. In reality, this is not possible; therefore, tic workup is required. If there is no clinically
spreading out the collection of blood cultures in- obvious source of infection and unless the patient is
creases the likelihood of blood collection during clinically deteriorating (falling BP, decreased urine
bacteremia. It is therefore recommended that at output, increasing confusion, rising serum lactate
least two and no more than three sets of blood concentration, falling platelet count, or worsening
cultures should be obtained by separate needle sticks coagulopathy), or the temperature is ⬎ 39°C
from different venipuncture sites.206 Colonization of (102°F), it may be prudent to perform blood cultures
the lumen of central venous catheters occurs within and then observe the patient before embarking on
a short period of time after placement. Therefore, further diagnostic tests and commencing empiric
862 Reviews
Figure 1. Fever diagnostic algorithm. Dx ⫽ diagnostic; ABx ⫽ antibiotics; Rx ⫽ therapy.
antibiotics. However, all neutropenic patients with loose stools, and CT scan of the sinuses with removal
fever and patients with severe (as outlined above) or of all nasal tubes. Urine culture is indicated only in
progressive signs of sepsis should be started on patients with abnormalities of the renal system or
broad-spectrum antimicrobial therapy immediately following urinary tract manipulation. If the patient is
after obtaining appropriate cultures. at risk of abdominal sepsis or has any abdominal
In patients whose clinical picture is consistent with signs (tenderness, distension, unable to tolerate en-
infection and in whom no clinically obvious source teral feeds) CT scan of abdomen is indicated. Pa-
has been documented, removal of all central lines tients with right upper quadrant tenderness require
⬎ 48 h old (with semiquantitative or quantitative an abdominal ultrasound.
culture) is recommended as well as stool for WBC Reevaluation of the patient’s status after 48 h
count and C difficile toxin in those patients with using all available results and the evolution of the
864 Reviews
temperature on the chemotaxis, phagocytic engulfment, 47 O’Grady NP, Barie PS, Bartlett J, et al. Practice parameters
digestion and O2 consumption of human polymorphonu- for evaluating new fever in critically ill adult patients. Crit
clear leukocytes. J Reticuloendothel Soc 1980; 27:561–565 Care Med 1998; 26:392– 408
25 Biggar WD, Bohn DJ, Kent G, et al. Neutrophil migration in 48 Musher DM, Fainstein V, Young EJ, et al. Fever patterns:
vitro and in vivo during hypothermia. Infect Immunol 1984; their lack of clinical significance. Arch Intern Med 1979;
46:857– 859 139:1225–1228
26 Azocar J, Yunis EJ, Essex M. Sensitivity of human natural 49 Chastre J, Fagon JY, Trouillet JL. Diagnosis and treatment
killer cells to hyperthermia. Lancet 1982; 1:16 –17 of nosocomial pneumonia in patients in intensive care units.
27 Styrt B, Sugarman B. Antipyresis and fever. Arch Intern Clin Infect Dis 1995; 21(Suppl 3):S226 –S237
Med 1990; 150:1589 –1597 50 Kollef MH. Ventilator-associated pneumonia: a multivariate
28 Dennie CC. A history of syphilis. Springfield, IL: Charles C. analysis. JAMA 1993; 270:1965–1970
Thomas, 1962 51 Hiyama DT, Zinner MJ. Surgical complications. In:
29 Small PM, Tauber MG, Hackbarth CJ, et al. Influence of Schwartz SI, Shires GT, Spencer FC et al, eds. Principles of
body temperature on bacterial growth rates in experimental surgery. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill, 1994; 455– 487
pneumococcal meningitis in rabbits. Infect Immunol 1986; 52 Calandra T, Bille J, Schneider R, et al. Clinical significance
52:484 – 487 of Candida isolated from peritoneum in surgical patients.
30 Sande MA, Sande ER, Woolwine JD, et al. The influence of Lancet 1989; 2:1437–1440
fever on the development of experimental Streptococcus 53 Petri MG, Konig J, Moecke HP, et al. Epidemiology of
pneumoniae meningitis. J Infect Dis 1987; 156:849 – 850 invasive mycosis in ICU patients: a prospective multicenter
31 Anderson KJ, Kuhn RE. Elevated environmental tempera- study in 435 non-neutropenic patients. Paul-Ehrlich Society
ture enhances immunity in experimental Chagas’ disease. for Chemotherapy, Divisions of Mycology and Pneumonia
Infect Immunol 1989; 57:13–17 Research. Intensive Care Med 1997; 23:317–325
32 Carmichael LE, Barnes FD, Percy DH. Temperature as a 54 Nolla-Salas J, Sitges-Serra A, Leon-Gil C, et al. Candidemia
factor in resistance of young puppies to canine herpesvirus. in non-neutropenic critically ill patients: analysis of prognos-
J Infect Dis 1969; 120:669 – 678 tic factors and assessment of systemic antifungal therapy.
33 Bryant RE, Hood AF, Hood CE, et al. Factors affecting Study Group of Fungal Infection in the ICU. Intensive Care
mortality of gram-negative rod bacteremia. Arch Intern Med Med 1997; 23:23–30
1971; 127:120 –128 55 Ferrara JL. The febrile platelet transfusion reaction: a
34 Weinstein MR, Iannini PB, Stratton CW, et al. Spontaneous cytokine shower. Transfusion 1995; 35:89 –90
bacterial peritonitis: a review of 28 cases with emphasis on 56 Chen CC, Wang SS, Lee FY, et al. Proinflammatory cyto-
improved survival and factors influencing prognosis. Am J kines in early assessment of the prognosis of acute pancre-
Med 1978; 64:592–598 atitis. Am J Gastroenterol 1999; 94:213–218
35 Dorn TF, DeAngelis C, Baumgardner RA, et al. Acetamin- 57 Osman MO, El-Sefi T, Lausten SB, et al. Sodium fusidate
ophen: more harm than good for chickenpox? J Pediatr and the cytokine response in an experimental model of acute
1989; 114:1045–1048 pancreatitis. Br J Surg 1998; 85:1487–1492
36 Manthous CA, Hall JB, Olson D, et al. Effect of cooling on 58 Feuerstein GZ, Wang X, Barone FC. The role of cytokines
oxygen consumption in febrile critically ill patients. Am J in the neuropathology of stroke and neurotrauma. Neuro-
Respir Crit Care Med 1995; 151:10 –14 immunomodulation 1998; 5:143–159
37 Ginsberg MD, Busto R. Combating hyperthermia in acute 59 DeGraba TJ. The role of inflammation after acute stroke:
stroke: a significant clinical concern. Stroke 1998; 29:529 – utility of pursuing anti-adhesion molecule therapy. Neurol-
534 ogy 1998; 51(3 Suppl 3):S62–S68
38 Badawi N, Kurinczuk JJ, Keogh JM, et al. Intrapartum risk 60 Carlstedt F, Lind L, Lindahl B. Proinflammatory cytokines,
factors for newborn encephalopathy: the Western Australian measured in a mixed population on arrival in the emergency
case-control study. BMJ 1998; 317:1554 –1558 department, are related to mortality and severity of disease.
39 Quinn M, Matthews TG. Does maternal pyrexia embarrass J Intern Med 1997; 242:361–365
the fetus? Irish Med J 1984; 77:218 –219 61 Marx N, Neumann FJ, Ott I, et al. Induction of cytokine
40 Schmitz T, Bair N, Falk M, et al. A comparison of five expression in leukocytes in acute myocardial infarction. J Am
methods of temperature measurement in febrile intensive Coll Cardiol 1997; 30:165–170
care patients. Am J Crit Care 1995; 4:286 –292 62 Clemmer TP, Fisher CJ, Jr, Bone RC, et al. Hypothermia in
41 Milewski A, Ferguson KL, Terndrup TE. Comparison of the sepsis syndrome and clinical outcome. The Methylpred-
pulmonary artery, rectal, and tympanic membrane temper- nisolone Severe Sepsis Study Group. Crit Care Med 1992;
atures in adult intensive care unit patients. Clin Pediatr 20:1395–1401
1991; 30(4 Suppl):13–16 63 Sprung CL, Peduzzi PN, Shatney CH, et al. Impact of
42 Nierman DM. Core temperature measurement in the inten- encephalopathy on mortality in the sepsis syndrome. The
sive care unit. Crit Care Med 1991; 19:818 – 823 Veterans Administration Systemic Sepsis Cooperative Study
43 Erickson RS, Kirklin SK. Comparison of ear-based, bladder, Group. Crit Care Med 1990; 18:801– 806
oral, and axillary methods for core temperature measure- 64 Arons MM, Wheeler AP, Bernard GR, et al. Effects of
ment. Crit Care Med 1993; 21:1528 –1534 ibuprofen on the physiology and survival of hypothermic
44 Hayward JS, Eckerson JD, Kemna D. Thermal and cardio- sepsis. Crit Care Med 1999; 27:699 –707
vascular changes during three methods of resuscitation from 65 Marik PE, Zaloga GP. Hypothermia and cytokines in septic
mild hypothermia. Resuscitation 1984; 11:21–33 shock [abstract]. Crit Care Med 1999; 27(Suppl):A136
45 Shiraki K, Konda N, Sagawa S. Esophageal and tympanic 66 Clarke DE, Kimelman J, Raffin TA. The evaluation of fever
temperature responses to core blood temperature changes in the intensive care unit. Chest 1991; 100:213–220
during hyperthermia. J Appl Physiol 1986; 61:98 –102 67 Cunha BA. Fever in the critical care unit. Crit Care Clin
46 Shiraki K, Sagawa S, Tajima F, et al. Independence of brain 1998; 14:1–14
and tympanic temperatures in an unanesthetized human. 68 Chambers LA, Kruskall MS, Pacini DG, et al. Febrile
J Appl Physiol 1988; 65:482– 486 reactions after platelet transfusion: the effect of single versus
866 Reviews
nia in patients receiving continuous mechanical ventilation: cultures of endotracheal aspirates for the diagnosis of ven-
prospective analysis of 52 episodes with use of a protected tilator-associated pneumonia. Am Rev Respir Dis 1993;
specimen brush and quantitative culture techniques. Am 148:1552–1557
Rev Respir Dis 1989; 139:877– 884 133 Marquette CH, Copin MC, Wallet F, et al. Diagnostic tests
114 Meduri GU. Diagnosis and differential diagnosis of ventila- for pneumonia in ventilated patients: prospective evaluation
tor-associated pneumonia. Clin Chest Med 1995; 16:61–93 of diagnostic accuracy using histology as a diagnostic gold
115 Fagon JY, Chastre J, Hance AJ, et al. Detection of nosoco- standard. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1995; 151:1878 –1888
mial lung infection in ventilated patients: use of a protected 134 Kirtland SH, Corely DE, Winterbauer RH, et al. The
specimen brush and quantitative culture in 147 patients. Am diagnosis of ventilator-associated pneumonia: a comparison
Rev Respir Dis 1988; 138:110 –116 of histologic, microbiologic, and clinical criteria. Chest 1997;
116 Torres A, Aznar R, Gatell JM, et al. Incidence, risk, and 112:445– 457
prognosis factors of nosocomial pneumonia in mechanically 135 Corely DE, Kirtland SH, Winterbauer RH, et al. Reproduc-
ventilated patients. Am Rev Respir Dis 1990; 142:523–528 ibility of the histologic diagnosis of pneumonia among a
117 Timsit JF, Chevret S, Valcke J, et al. Mortality of nosocomial panel of four pathologists: analysis of a gold standard. Chest
pneumonia in ventilated patients: influence of diagnostic 1997; 112:458 – 465
tools. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1996; 154:116 –123 136 Sterling TR, Ho EJ, Brehm WT, et al. Diagnosis and
118 Timsit JF, Misset B, Goldstein FW, et al. Reappraisal of treatment of ventilator-associated pneumonia: impact on
distal diagnostic testing in the diagnosis of ICU-acquired survival; a decision analysis. Chest 1996; 110:1025–1034
pneumonia. Chest 1995; 108:1632–1639 137 Luna CM, Vujacich P, Niederman MS, et al. Impact of BAL
119 Craig CP, Connelley S. Effect of intensive care unit noso- data on the therapy and outcome of ventilator-associated
comial pneumonia on duration and mortality. Am J Infect pneumonia. Chest 1997; 111:676 – 685
Control 1984; 12:233–238 138 Rello J, Gallego M, Mariscal D, et al. The value of routine
120 Bregeon F, Papazian L, Visconti A, et al. Relationship of microbial investigation in ventilator-associated pneumonia.
microbiologic diagnostic criteria to morbidity and mortality Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1997; 156:196 –200
in patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia. JAMA 139 Kollef MH, Ward S. The influence of mini-BAL cultures on
1997; 277:655– 662 patients outcomes: implications for the antibiotic manage-
121 Fagon JY, Chastre J, Hance AJ, et al. Nosocomial pneumo- ment of ventilator-associated pneumonia. Chest 1998; 113:
nia in ventilated patients: a cohort study evaluating attribut- 412– 420
able mortality and hospital stay. Am J Med 1993; 94:281–288 140 Wearden PD, Chendrasekhar A, Timberlake GA. Compar-
122 Fagon JY, Chastre J, Hance AJ, et al. Evaluation of clinical ison of nonbronchoscopic techniques with bronchoscopic
judgment in the identification and treatment of nosocomial brushing in the diagnosis of ventilator-associated pneumo-
pneumonia in ventilated patients. Chest 1993; 103:547–553 nia. J Trauma 1996; 41:703–707
123 Marik PE, Brown WJ. A comparison of bronchoscopic vs 141 Bello S, Tajada A, Chacon E, et al. “Blind” protected
blind protected specimen brush sampling in patients with specimen brushing versus bronchoscopic techniques in the
suspected ventilator-associated pneumonia. Chest 1995; aetiolological diagnosis of ventilator- associated pneumonia.
108:203–207 Eur Respir J 1996; 9:1494 –1499
124 Chastre J, Fagon JY, Bornet-Lecso M, et al. Evaluation of 142 Papazian L, Thomas P, Garbe L, et al. Bronchoscopic or
bronchoscopic techniques for the diagnosis of nosocomial blind sampling techniques for the diagnosis of ventilator-
pneumonia. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1995; 152:231–240 associated pneumonia. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1995;
125 Kollef MH, Bock KR, Richards RD, et al. The safety and 152:1982–1991
diagnostic accuracy of minibronchoalveolar lavage in pa- 143 Leal-Noval SR, Alfaro-Rodriguez E, Murillo-Cabeza F, et al.
tients with suspected ventilator-associated pneumonia. Ann Diagnostic value of the blind brush in mechanically-venti-
Intern Med 1995; 122:743–748 lated patients with nosocomial pneumonia. Intensive Care
126 Allaouchiche B, Jaumain H, Dumontet C, et al. Early Med 1992; 18:410 – 414
diagnosis of ventilator-associated pneumonia: is it possible to 144 Rouby JJ, De Lassale EM, Poete P, et al. Nosocomial
define a cutoff value of infected cells in BAL fluid? Chest bronchopneumonia in the critically ill: histologic and bacte-
1996; 110:1558 –1565 riologic aspects. Am Rev Respir Dis 1992; 146:1059 –1066
127 Speich R, Wust J, Hess T, et al. Prospective evaluation of a 145 Marik PE, Careau P. A comparison of mini-bronchoalveolar
semiquantitative dip slide method compared with quantita- lavage and blind-protected specimen brush sampling in
tive bacterial cultures of BAL fluid. Chest 1996; 109:1423– ventilated patients with suspected pneumonia. J Crit Care
1429 1998; 13:67–72
128 Kollef MH, Eisenberg PR, Ohlendorf MF, et al. The 146 Grindlinger GA, Niehoff J, Hughes L, et al. Acute paranasal
accuracy of elevated concentrations of endotoxin in bron- sinusitis related to nasotracheal intubation of head-injured
choalveolar lavage fluid for the rapid diagnosis of gram- patients. Crit Care Med 1987; 15:214 –217
negative pneumonia. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1996; 147 Deutschman CS, Wilton P, Sinow J, et al. Paranasal sinusitis
154:1020 –1028 associated with nasotracheal intubation: a frequently unrec-
129 Timset JF, Misset B, Azoulay E, et al. Usefulness of airway ognized and treatable source of sepsis. Crit Care Med 1986;
visualization in the diagnosis of nosocomial pneumonia in 14:111–114
ventilated patients. Chest 1996; 110:172–179 148 Rouby JJ, Laurent P, Gosnach M, et al. Risk factors and
130 Jourdain B, Joly-Guillou ML, Dombret MC, et al. Useful- clinical relevance of nosocomial maxillary sinusitis in the
ness of quantitative cultures of BAL fluid for diagnosing critically ill. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1994; 150:776 –783
nosocomial pneumonia in ventilated patients. Chest 1997; 149 Fassoulaki A, Pamouktsoglou P. Prolonged nasotracheal
111:411– 418 intubation and its association with inflammation of paranasal
131 Torres A, el-Ebiary M, Fabregas N, et al. Value of intracel- sinuses. Anesth Analg 1989; 69:50 –52
lular bacteria detection in the diagnosis of ventilator associ- 150 Holzapfel L, Chastang C, Demingeon G, et al. Randomized
ated pneumonia. Thorax 1996; 51:378 –384 study assessing the systematic search for maxillary sinusitis
132 el-Ebiary M, Torres A, Gonzalez J, et al. Quantitative in nasotracheally mechanically ventilated patients. Am J
868 Reviews
191 Brazier JS. The diagnosis of Clostridium difficile-associated units. French ICU Group for Severe Sepsis. JAMA 1995;
disease. J Antimicrob Chemother 1998; 41(Suppl C):29 – 40 274:968 –974
192 Kelly CP, Pouthoulakis C, LaMont JT Clostridia Difficile 204 Levin PD, Hersch M, Rudensky B, et al. Routine surveil-
Colitis. N Engl J Med 1994; 330:257–262 lance blood cultures: their place in the management of
193 Beck-Sague C, Jarvis WR. Secular trends in the epidemiol- critically ill patients. J Infect 1997; 35:125–128
ogy of nosocomial fungal infections in the United States, 205 Bennett IL, Beeson RB. Bacteremia: a consideration of
1980 –1990. National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance some experimental and clinical aspects. Yale J Biol Med
System. J Infect Dis 1993; 167:1247–1251 1954; 262:241–262
194 Rello J, Esandi ME, Diaz E, et al. The role of Candida sp 206 Chandrasekar PH, Brown WJ. Clinical issues of blood
isolated from bronchoscopic samples in nonneutropenic
cultures. Arch Intern Med 1994; 154:841– 849
patients. Chest 1998; 114:146 –149
207 Wormser GP, Onorato IM, Preminger TJ, et al. Sensitivity
195 el Ebiary M, Torres A, Fabregas N, et al. Significance of the
and specificity of blood cultures obtained through intravas-
isolation of Candida species from respiratory samples in
critically ill, non-neutropenic patients: an immediate post- cular catheters. Crit Care Med 1990; 18:152–156
mortem histologic study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1997; 208 Ilstrup DM, Washington JA. The importance of volume of
156(2 Pt 1):583–590 blood culture in the detection of bacteremia and fungemia.
196 Adelson-Mitty J, Fink MP, Lisbon A. The value of lumbar Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 1983; 1:107–110
puncture in the evaluation of critically ill, non-immunosup- 209 Mermel LA, Maki DG. Detection of bacteremia in adults:
pressed, surgical patients: a retrospective analysis of 70 consequences of culturing an inadequate volume of blood.
cases. Intensive Care Med 1997; 23:749 –752 Ann Intern Med 1993; 119:270 –272
197 Metersky ML, Williams A, Rafanan AL. Retrospective anal- 210 Levin PD, Yinnon AM, Hersch M, et al. Impact of the resin
ysis: are fever and mental status indications for lumbar blood culture medium on the treatment of critically ill
puncture in a hospitalized patient who has not undergone patients. Crit Care Med 1996; 24:797– 801
neurosurgery. Clin Infect Dis 1997; 25:285–288 211 Davis LP, Fink-Bennett D. Nuclear medicine in the acutely
198 Dotson RG, Pingleton SK. The effect of antibiotic therapy ill patient: II. Crit Care Clin 1994; 10:383– 400
on recovery of intracellular bacteria from bronchoalveolar 212 Meduri GU, Belenchia JM, Massie JD, et al. The role of
lavage in suspected ventilator- associated nosocomial pneu- gallium-67 scintigraphy in diagnosing sources of fever in
monia. Chest 1993; 103:541–546 ventilated patients. Intensive Care Med 1996; 22:395– 403
199 Souweine B, Veber B, Bedos JP, et al. Diagnostic accuracy 213 Berrouschot J, Sterker M, Bettin S, et al. Mortality of
of protected specimen brush and bronchoalveolar lavage in space-occupying (’malignant’) middle cerebral artery infarc-
nosocomial pneumonia: impact of previous antimicrobial tion under conservative intensive care. Intensive Care Med
treatments. Crit Care Med 1998; 26:236 –244 1998; 24:620 – 623
200 Crowe M, Ispahani P, Humphreys H, et al. Bacteraemia in 214 Clifton GL, Allen S, Barrodale P, et al. A phase II study of
the adult intensive care unit of a teaching hospital in moderate hypothermia in severe brain injury. J Neuro-
Nottingham, UK, 1985–1996. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect trauma 1993; 10:263–271
Dis 1998; 17:377–384 215 Marion DW, Obrist WD, Carlier PM, et al. The use of
201 Valles J, Leon C, Alvarez-Lerma F. Nosocomial bacteremia moderate therapeutic hypothermia for patients with severe
in critically ill patients: a multicenter study evaluating head injuries: a preliminary report. J Neurosurg 1993;
epidemiology and prognosis. Spanish Collaborative Group 79:354 –362
for Infections in Intensive Care Units of Sociedad Espanola 216 Marion DW, Penrod LE, Kelsey SF, et al. Treatment of
de Medicina Intensiva y Unidades Coronarias (SEMIUC). traumatic brain injury with moderate hypothermia. N Engl
Clin Infect Dis 1997; 24:387–395 J Med 1997; 336:540 –546
202 Brun-Buisson C, Doyon F, Carlet J. Bacteremia and severe 217 Mackowiak PA. Fever: blessing or curse? A unifying hypoth-
sepsis in adults: a multicenter prospective survey in ICUs esis. Ann Intern Med 1994; 120:1037–1040
and wards of 24 hospitals. French Bacteremia-Sepsis Study 218 O’Donnel J, Axelrod P, Fisher C, et al. Use of and effec-
Group. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1996; 154(3 Pt 1):617– tiveness of hypothermia blankets for febrile patients in the
624 intensive care unit. Clin Infect Dis 1997; 24:1208 –1213
203 Brun-Buisson C, Doyon F, Carlet J, et al. Incidence, risk 219 Lenhardt R, Negishi C, Sessler DI, et al. The effects of
factors, and outcome of severe sepsis and septic shock in physical treatment on induced fever in humans. Am J Med
adults: a multicenter prospective study in intensive care 1999; 106:550 –555