Rojo 2011
Rojo 2011
a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t
Keywords: In this work an electrokinetic remediation cell for copper mine tailings using sinusoidal electric field was
Electroremediation analyzed. The sinusoidal electric field was obtained by applying simultaneously continuous-alternating
Alternating current voltages; in this work an alternating voltage of high frequency was applied. The system was tested con-
Direct current
sidering the effect of: (1) the effective voltage applied to the cell and (2) the polarity reversal of the cell.
Copper mine tailings
According to the conditions studied in this investigation, the laboratory results showed that a high fre-
quency sinusoidal electric field improves the EKR process, and increasing the effective voltage improves
the remediation action, especially when a polarity inversion is present, which reduces polarization during
the process.
© 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
∗ Corresponding author. Tel.: +56 32 2654463; fax: +56 32 2654478. The mine tailing used for remediation experiments was sam-
E-mail address: adrian.rojo@usm.cl (A. Rojo). pled from the Caren impoundment at Codelco-El Teniente copper
1383-5866/$ – see front matter © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.seppur.2011.03.029
140 A. Rojo et al. / Separation and Purification Technology 79 (2011) 139–143
Table 2 Table 3
Remediation conditions. Final total copper concentration, CF [mg/kg] and pH.
Exp Applied voltage Veffective [V] Vmax [V] Vmin a [V] Exp Anode Center Cathode Anode Center Cathode
DC [V] AC [V] CF pH
1 7.2 23.0 17.8 30.2 −15.9 1 740 880 610 3.2 3.1 3.2
2 15.3 23.0 22.3 38.3 −7.8 2 420 630 570 3.3 3.4 3.5
3 23.3 23.0 28.4 46.3 0.3 3 842 860 1075 3.1 3.2 3.2
4 29.0 23.0 33.2 52.0 6.0 4 480 880 1150 3.6 2.5 3.5
5 23.3 31.0 31.8 54.3 −7.7 5 460 950 840 2.9 2.9 3.0
6 29.0 31.0 36.4 60.0 −2.0 6 490 920 610 3.0 3.1 6.7
7 23.0 – – – – 7 450 620 1000 2.9 3.1 3.5
a
Negative values, experiment with periodic polarity reversal.
Table 4
General remediation results in terms of removal and/or accumulation [%].
nected to the cell by two titanium rods immersed in the electrode Exp Anode Center Cathode Cell
compartment. In order to separate the central compartment from CF
the lateral ones, nylon mesh (149 m) and filter paper (grade 131) 1− Co
× 100
were used. The pre-treated mine tailings were placed in central 1 19.6 4.3 33.7 19.2
compartment. Initially, in the anode compartment, the electrolyte 2 54.3 31.5 38.0 42.2
was distilled water, and in the cathode compartment was dilute sul- 3 8.5 6.5 −16.8 1.6
4 47.8 4.3 −25.0 8.4
furic acid solution, later a continuous drop addition of concentrated
5 50.0 −3.3 8.7 18.7
acid to maintain pH below 4 was supplied. On the other hand, to 6 46.7 0.0 33.7 28.2
control pH in the cathode compartment, a sample was taken each 7 51.1 32.6 −8.7 24.6
day for pH monitoring.
After the experiments were carried out, mine tailing sample was
segmented into three slices of equal size, where copper concentra- 3.1. Copper removal
tion was measured. In this work anode zone is defined as the slice
closest to the anode, center zone the slice in the middle, and cathode EKR with sinusoidal electric field obtained by applying DC and
zone the slice closest to the cathode. AC voltages simultaneously can achieve a copper removal from the
cell better than EKR with continuous electric field. In this context,
comparing experiments 2 and 7, which were made at a simi-
2.5. Experimental plan lar voltage, the use of a sinusoidal electric field represents a 70%
improvement in the copper removal from the cell. In all experi-
Seven EKR experiments with a remediation time of 7 days were ments, no significant electroosmotic flow was observed, meaning
carried out with the conditions given in Table 2. In all experiments, that the main mechanism for copper removal is electromigration.
a sample of approximately 1.6 kg solid dry weight of mine tail- Moreover, experiments with sinusoidal electric field in which
ings was adjusted to an initial humidity of 20%, using sulfuric acid a polarity reversal occurs during the cycle, indicated by the nega-
solution. tive minimum voltage shown in Table 2 (experiments 1, 2, 5 and
The objective of the experiments was to evaluate the effect of: (i) 6), copper removal was also observed in the cathode zone. In addi-
the effective voltage applied to the cell and (ii) the polarity reversal tion, experiment 2 with sinusoidal electric field reached a copper
of the cell, in the copper removal and the electrical energy con- removal from the cell which involved virtually all soluble copper
sumption of the process. A reference was conducted to compare in the mine tailing sample.
these experiments with conventional EKR. In the analysis of copper removal and/or accumulation, the effect
With a sinusoidal electric field obtained by applying simul- of the effective voltage (Veffective ) was evaluated by considering the
taneously continuous-alternating (DC–AC) voltages, the effective following combinations: (i) VAC = 23.0 [V] fixed and VDC varying
voltage applied to the cell is determined by: between 7.2 and 29.0 V and (ii) VDC = 23.3 and 29.0 [V] fixed and
VAC varying between 23.0 and 31.0 [V] in both cases.
V = VDC + VAC · sin(2ft) Tables 5 and 6 show the copper removal and/or accumulation as
the effective voltage and the combinations defined in the preceding
paragraph.
T Comparing the experiments that remained fixed VAC and VDC
1
Veffective = · V 2 dt was variable; Table 5 shows that copper removal from the cell
T 0 increases proportionally with the effective voltage in the range
17.8–22.3 [V] and 28.4–33.2 [V]. In the first, 17.8–22.3 [V], the
where VDC : continuous voltage [V]; VAC : alternating voltage [V]; f: removals are greater because the polarity of the cell during the
frequency [s−1 ]; t: time [s]; T: period [s]; Veffective : effective voltage
[V].
Table 5
Removal and/or accumulation [%] vs Veffective . VAC = 23.0 V and VDC variable.
3. Results and discussion
Exp Veffective [V] Anode Center Cathode Cell
CF
Table 3 shows copper concentrations in the anode, center, and 1− Co
× 100
cathode zone of the remediation sample after EKR experiments. 1 17.8 19.6 4.3 33.7 19.2
Table 4 includes a summary with general EKR results in terms of 2 22.3 54.3 31.5 38.0 42.2
removal (positive values) and/or accumulation (negative values) of 3 28.4 8.5 6.5 −16.8 1.6
total copper from the already mentioned zones and the whole cell. 4 33.2 47.8 4.3 −25.0 8.4
142 A. Rojo et al. / Separation and Purification Technology 79 (2011) 139–143
Table 6
Removal and/or accumulation [%] vs Veffective . VDC = 23.3 and 29 V and VAC variable.
1 17.8 11,537 46 31
Exp Anode Center Cathode Cell
CF
2
3
22.3
28.4
33,670
7313
75
12
167
1426
1− Co
× 100
4 33.2 37,521 69 2181
1 1.50 19.6 4.3 33.7 19.2 5 31.8 37,910 82 1607
5 1.50 50.0 −3.3 8.7 18.7 6 36.4 105,685 210 3048
6 1.86 46.7 0.0 33.7 28.2 7 23.0a 86,324 – 1439
2 2.33 54.3 31.5 38.0 42.2 a
Continuous electric field.
A. Rojo et al. / Separation and Purification Technology 79 (2011) 139–143 143