0% found this document useful (0 votes)
80 views1 page

Balero VS People

Petitioner entered Malou's room through the window while she slept and pressed a chemical-soaked cloth over her mouth to subdue her. Malou struggled and was able to free her hand, then grabbed petitioner's genitals in defense. Petitioner fled without completing the act. The court found petitioner not guilty of attempted rape, as pressing the cloth did not constitute an overt act that would necessarily lead to rape, and petitioner made no attempt to undress or touch Malou privately. His intentions for subduing her could not be clearly determined from his actions alone.

Uploaded by

memory furika
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
80 views1 page

Balero VS People

Petitioner entered Malou's room through the window while she slept and pressed a chemical-soaked cloth over her mouth to subdue her. Malou struggled and was able to free her hand, then grabbed petitioner's genitals in defense. Petitioner fled without completing the act. The court found petitioner not guilty of attempted rape, as pressing the cloth did not constitute an overt act that would necessarily lead to rape, and petitioner made no attempt to undress or touch Malou privately. His intentions for subduing her could not be clearly determined from his actions alone.

Uploaded by

memory furika
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

BALERO V.

PEOPLE

G.R. NO. 138033

FEBRUARY 22, 2006

FACTS:

One evening, inside her room, Malou retired at around 10:30. Outside, right in front of her bedroom
door, her maid slept on a folding bed. Early morning of the following day, petitioner, clad in t-shirt and
shorts, entered the room of Malou through its window. Once inside, he approached Malou and tightly
pressed on her face a piece of cloth soaked with chemical and. at the same time, pinned her down on
the bed. She was awakened thereby and she struggled but could not move.

She wanted to scream for help but the hands covering her mouth with cloth wet with chemicals were
very tight. Still, Malou continued fighting off her attacker by kicking him until at last her right hand got
free. With this, the opportunity presented itself when she was able to grab hold of his sex organ which
she then squeezed. Petitioner let her go and escaped while Malou went straight to the bedroom door
and roused her maid.

ISSUE:

Is petitioner guilty of attempted rape?

HELD:

No, he is not. There is absolutely no dispute about the absence of sexual intercourse or carnal
knowledge in the present case. The next question that thus comes to the fore is whether or not the act
of the petitioner, i.e., the pressing of a chemical-soaked cloth while on top of Malou, constitutes an
overt act of rape.

Overt or external act has been defined as some physical activity or deed, indicating the intention to
commit a particular crime, more than a mere planning or preparation, which if carried out to its
complete termination following its natural course, without being frustrated by external obstacles nor by
the voluntary desistance of the perpetrator, will logically and necessarily ripen into a concrete offense.

Harmonizing the above definition to the facts of this case, it would be too strained to construe
petitioner's act of pressing a chemical-soaked cloth in the mouth of Malou which would induce her to
sleep as an overt act that will logically and necessarily ripen into rape. As it were, petitioner did not
commence at all the performance of any act indicative of an intent or attempt to rape Malou. It cannot
be overemphasized that petitioner was fully clothed and that there was no attempt on his part to
undress Malou, let alone touch her private part. For what reason petitioner wanted the complainant
unconscious, if that was really his immediate intention, is anybody’s guess.

You might also like