1) Neeraj Kumar
1) Neeraj Kumar
REVIEW ARTICLE
The demand for the tooth color restorations and a more In 1955, Buonocore’s research into the acid-etch technique
attractive smile has now passed the boundaries of exclusive provided a simple method of increasing the adhesion to enamel
practitioners, specialist and the esthetic centers to all over surface for acrylic filling materials2. His discovery was quickly
the world. As esthetically pleasing restorations of young followed by Bowen’s work with filled resin. Only in 1970s,
however, with introduction of visible-light cured composites,
did the dentist have the necessary working time to properly
Dr Neeraj Kumar has done his graduation (BDS) shape direct composite laminate veneers. In the 1970s, Faunce
from College of Dental Sciences, Manipal in 2002 described a one-piece acrylic resin prefabricated veneer as
and postgraduation (MDS) from A B Shetty MIDS an improved alternative to direct composite resin bonding.3,4
Mangalore in 2008. He is currently working as senior These veneers were primed with ethyl acetate or methylene
lecturer in Azamagarh Dental College. chloride liquid and luted to the etched tooth with a composite
resin.
Department of Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics, 1Azamagarh The concept of laminate veneers although existing long back,
Dental College, Azamagarh, 2Sardar Patel PG Dental & Medical Health got surface in 1975 by Rochette who introduced the use of
Sciences, 4 Saraswati Dental College & Hospital, Lucknow (UP),
3
Department of Dentistry, Govt. Medical College & Hospital, Agartala,
silane coupling agent with porcelain laminate veneers of
India. repairing fractured incisors.5 Then the popularity of porcelain
Address for Correspondence: laminate skyrocketed in 1980s partly because o f its
Dr Neeraj Kumar, Department of Conservative Dentistry conservative nature and the dental researches in the etched
& Endodontics,1Azamagarh Dental College, Azamagarh,
Contact: +91 9450540189, E-mail: njmahe98@gmail.com.
technique and new bonding methods.
Date of Submission : 09-03-2012
Reviews Completed : 26-04-2012 In the 1983- Porcelain as a material for veneering was first
Date of Acceptance : 28-04-2012 reported by Horn, using commercially available porcelain.6
Asian Journal of Oral Health & Allied Sciences 2012, Volume 2, Issue 1 17
Veneer in Restorative Dentistry Kumar et al.
In the 1983, Horn advocated the use of a light-curing resin 4. Marginal integrity and discoloration were worse when
luting agent for efficacy and convenience. the restoration margin was within dentin.
In the 1983, Simonsen and Calamia demonstrated that etching 5. The weak link in bonding PLVs was the dentin resin
of the internal surface of the porcelain veneer allowed the cement bond.
veneer to be retained on etched tooth enamel better than
composite resins or acrylic resin.7,8 6. The wearing time had a significant influence on the
porcelain surface, marginal integrity, and marginal
In the 1984, study done by Calamia revealed the enhancement discoloration.
of the etched porcelain/luting resin bond by chemical means
through pretreatment with silane.9 7. Papillary bleeding on probing and recession increased
when the preparatio n margins were l ocat ed
1986- Nicholls J.I. showed that tensile forces are primarily equigingivally or subgingivally. 16
responsible for dislodgement of esthetic veneers that are
cemented with microfilled resins.10 Overall the esthetic results over an extended period remain
excellent, as did patient’s acceptance.
1987- Heymann HO demonstrated a clinical technique of
indirect composite resin veneers11 2000- Peumans m et al stated that an optimal bond was
obtained if the preparation was located completely in enamel,
1988 - Reid J.S. did a study on tooth color modification and if correct surface treatment procedures were carried out and if
po rcel ain veneers and found a method whereby t he a suitable composite luting agent was selected. They also
appearance of a discolored tooth could be improved not only concluded that the major shortcoming of porcelain veneers
by masking the discoloration but also by producing a more was the relatively wide marginal discrepancy. 17
natural result.12
2001- Hager Bertil, Agneta Oden, Bernt Anderson et al
1989- Graber A. David compared direct composite veneer DESCRIBED the use of Procera All ceram laminates for patients
versus etched porcelain laminate veneers. He concluded that with discolored teeth.18
the etched porcelain restoration, in future would replace direct
bonding composite restoration in most clinical situation. 2004- Magne pascal demonstrated novel porcelain laminates
preparation approach driven by a diagnostic mock-up. 19
1991 - Herbert Victor Exner investigated the predictability of
colour (hue value and chroma) on cervical surfaces, body 2005-George P. Cherukara, Graham R. Davis, Kevin G.Seymour,
surfaces and incisal surfaces of ceramic veneers and the extent Lifong Zou, DayanandaY.D.Samarawickrama did a study to
to which laminates may be shade adapted by use of tints and assess the effectiveness of 3 clinical techniques, namely,
opaquers on the fitting surfaces.13 dimple, depth groove, and freehand, in producing an
intraenamel preparation. Within the limitations of this pilot
1991 - Rada E. Robert and Betty Jean Jankowski described study, the 3 different techniques tested did not differ
porcelain laminate veneer provisionalization using visible light significantly in conserving enamel.20
cure acrylic resin.14
2006- Zarone, Ettore Epifania, Giuliana Leone, Roberto
1997- Rouse S. Jeffrey discussed the interproximal extension Sorrentino, Marco Ferrari, demonstrated that chamfer
of full veneer and traditional veneer preparations.15 preparation is recommended for central incisors, whereas the
window preparation showed better results for canines.21
20 00-Dumfahrt Herbert and Herbert Schaffer did a
retrospective evaluation after one to ten years of service of 2006-Barghi et al did a study on effects of porcelain leucite
porcelain laminate veneers (PLVs). This study covered a content, types of etchants, and etching time on porcelain-
period from 14 months to 127 months and evaluated 191 PLV composite bond strength and they concluded that
restorations with a mean wearing time of 55.6 months. They
concluded that: 1. Gel hydrofluoric acid etchant provided higher porcelain-
composite bond strength than did the liquid etchant.
1. The survival probability of PLVs was 97% at 5 years
and 91% at 10 ½ years. 2. Proper etching of porcelain for boning depends on the
leucite content of the porcelain as well as the type of
2. The failure rate increased when the finish line was within etchant used.
an existing filling and/or when the veneer was partially
bonded to dentin. 3. Presence of additional leucite crystals may affect the
time required for proper etching of porcelain. 22
3. Occlusion played a major role in most failures.
18 Asian Journal of Oral Health & Allied Sciences 2012, Volume 2, Issue 1
Kumar et al. Veneer in Restorative Dentistry
2007- Sailer I et al compared color stability of three veneering full veneers are done, care must be taken to provide proper
ceramics for zirconia frameworks. Three veneering ceramic physiological contours, particularly in the gingival area, to
compared were Initial (GC), Triceram (Esprident) and Cercon favor good gingival health. One veneer has been lost and
Ceram S (DeguDent).They concluded that all 3 ceramics met severe gingival irritation exists around the remaining
the esthetic demands only to a limited extent. Triceram allowed overcontoured veneers.
to be the most predictable result in terms of color stability. 23
Partial veneer
Porcelain has long history in the dental field. It is one of the
most esthetically suitable and biocompatible material available. Full veneers can be accomplished by a direct or an indirect
Porcelain abrasion and stain resistance are excellent and well technique. When a small number of teeth are involved or
tolerated by gingival tissues. Thus it makes porcelain laminate when the entire facial surface is not faulty (partial veneers),
veneers superior to other veneering systems. directly applied composite veneers can be completed for the
patient in one appointment with chair side composite. Placing
A veneer is a layer of tooth colored material that is applied to direct composite full veneers is very time consuming and
a tooth for esthetically restoring localized or generalized labor intensive. However, for cases involving young children,
defects or intrinsic discolorations.24 a single discolored tooth or when economics or patient time
are limited precluding a laboratory fabricated veneer the direct
Constructing a veneer (without regard to the material) and
technique is a viable option.
bonding it to etched tooth structure is referred to as
“laminating” (Faunce FR). 3 Veneers also can be divided into two categories based method
of fabrication
The laminate veneer is a conservative alternative to full
coverage for improving the appearance of an anterior tooth 1. Directly fabricated composite resin veneers (i.e. free
(Horn HR).25 hand placed), and
A porcelain laminate veneer is an extremely thin shell 2. Indirectly fabricated veneers, such as preformed
of porcelain applied directly to tooth structure (McLaughlin laminates or laboratory-fabricated acrylic resin,
G). 26 microfilled resin, or porcelain veneers.
There is little difference between a laminate and veneer. In
Direct Veneers:24
general terms, a laminate is done to maintain the color, where
as a veneer is made to change the color. In esthetic dentistry, Buonocore’s research of the acid etch technique in 1955,
laminates are used to restore the original color of the tooth, combined with Bowen’s later use of filled resins, provided
whereas veneers are used to change the original color of the the technology enabling mechanical bonding between etched
tooth to make it look more natural.27 tooth and filled resins (direct bonding). Although these were
major breakthroughs in dental research by the early 1960s,
Types of Veneers 24 little esthetic use was made of this bonding technology of
nearly a decade. This was partially due to the limitations of
Veneers can be divided into two categories based tooth
the available self-curing resins, which did not allow sufficient
preparation
working time for the dentist to recreate a labial surface before
1. Partial veneers the composite resin chemically cured itself.
2. Full veneers The introduction of light cured composite resins in the early
to mid 1970s allowed the dentist greater flexibility. The
Indications 24 advantages of visible light cured composite resins, such as
greater working time and improved chemistry, versus the self-
Partial veneers and Full veneers cured composite resins, marked the entrée into the next
generation of esthetic materials. Visible light cured composite
Partial veneers are indicated for the restoration of localized
resins were replacing self-cured composite resins by the late
defects or areas of intrinsic discoloration. Full veneers are
1970s and were preferred for esthetic anterior restorations.
indicated for the restoration of generalized defect or areas of
intrinsic staining involving the majority of the facial surface Direct acid etched bonding proved to be advantageous, yet a
of the tooth. However, several important factors including susceptibility to stain, poor wear resistance and lack of natural
patient age, occlusion tissue health, position and alignment fluorescence spurred the continued search for improved
of the teeth and oral hygiene must be evaluated prior to materials.
pursuing full veneers as a treatment option. Furthermore, if
Asian Journal of Oral Health & Allied Sciences 2012, Volume 2, Issue 1 19
Veneer in Restorative Dentistry Kumar et al.
20 Asian Journal of Oral Health & Allied Sciences 2012, Volume 2, Issue 1
Kumar et al. Veneer in Restorative Dentistry
Asian Journal of Oral Health & Allied Sciences 2012, Volume 2, Issue 1 21
Veneer in Restorative Dentistry Kumar et al.
a) Greater density, high flexural strength, greater fracture ii) High strength.
resistance than feldspathic porcelain. iii) Surface hardness and occlusal wear similar to enamel.
b) No special lab equip or techniques are required for iv) Can produce wax patterns precisely by using lost wax
fabrication process. technique.
22 Asian Journal of Oral Health & Allied Sciences 2012, Volume 2, Issue 1
Kumar et al. Veneer in Restorative Dentistry
SiO2 (34%) with P2O5 forms the matrix and regulates thermal Advantages
properties.
Computer assisted system eliminate the problems that arise
Advantages: for the indirect fabrication technique employed.
i) Biocompatible Disadvantages
ii) Young’s modulus, tensile strength and compressive High cost and inabilit y to bui ld layers of colo r and
strength are higher than conventional porcelains. translucency.
These products are supplied in the form of ceramic ingots in 6) ART GLASS
various shades and with the hel p of a machi ne are
Polymer glass material.
fabricated.The fabrication process involves exposing a
ceramic ingot to a machining apparatus, which produces It offers the esthetics and longevity of porcelain but is tougher
desired contours. This is followed by occlusal adjustment, and more flexible.It can be easily adjusted or repaired
polishing, etching and bonding to the tooth. intraorally with any hybrid composite. It is color stable, plaque
Various types of ingots used are: repellent and offers perfect esthetics and margins.
d) Celay.
Asian Journal of Oral Health & Allied Sciences 2012, Volume 2, Issue 1 23
Veneer in Restorative Dentistry Kumar et al.
24 Asian Journal of Oral Health & Allied Sciences 2012, Volume 2, Issue 1
Kumar et al. Veneer in Restorative Dentistry
described for the first veneer. The retraction cords are removed 10. Nicholls J.I. 1986: “Esthetic veneer cementation”. JPD. 56(1),
9-12.
and both restorations are finished together to obtain
symmetrical contours. 11. Heymann HO, Indirect composite resin veneers: clinical
technique and two- year observations, Quintessence Int;
18(2):111-118.
CONCLUSION 12. Reid J.S. 1988 : “Tooth color modification and porcelain
veneers” Quintessence International 19(7), 476-481.
New emerging concepts in esthetic dentistry with regards to
13. Herbert Victor Exner 1991 : “predictability of color matching
materials technology and public awareness have made and the possibilities for enhancement of ceramic laminate
veneers on demand. It has been less than a decade since the veneers”. JPD 65, 619-622.
phenomenon of fusing porcelain directly to tooth was first 14. Rada Robert E. and Betty Jean Jankowski 1991 : “Porcelain
described in 1980s since then the growth and development in laminate veneer provisionalization using visible light curing
this field has been nothing short of humungous. Yet, because acrylic resin”. Quintessence Int. 22, 291-293.
the science is still in its infancy cautions is required. The 15. Rouse Jeffrey S. 1997: “Full veneer versus traditional veneer
preparation: A discussion of interproximal extension J Prosthet
average dentist has a tendency to think only in terms of Dent. 78(5), 544-549
articulation also and function with a little thought to esthetics. 16. Dumfahrt Herbert 1999: “Porcelain Laminate Veneers, A
We should always keep in mind that we are dealing with retrospective evaluation after 1 to 10 years of service Part I –
organs, which can change an individual’s entire visual Clinical Procedure. The International Journal of Prosthodontics
personality. A captivating smile showing an even row of 12(6), 504-511.
natural gleaming white teeth is a major factor in achieving 17. Peumans M et al. Porcelain veneers: A review of the literature,
journal of dentistry 2000; 28:163-177.
that elusive dominant characteristic called personality. The
18. Hager Bertil, Agneta Oden, Bernt Anderson and Lars Anderson
objective of cosmetic dentistry must be to provide the
2001: “Procera All Ceram Laminates: A clinical report”. J
maximum improvement in esthetic with the minimum trauma Prosthet Dent. 85(3), 230-233.
to the dentition. There are a number of procedure that begin 19. Magne pascal, Novel porcelain laminate preparation approach
in approximate the ideal parameter of cosmetic dentistry, most driven by a diagnostic mock-up. J Esthet Restor dent2004,
notably that of porcelain laminate veneers. 16(1):7-18.
20. George P. Cherukara et al 2005: Dentin exposure in tooth
Porcelain veneers are a useful adjunct to the armamentarium preparations for porcelain veneers: A pilot study. J Prosthet
of the dentist to help in the management of aesthetic problems Dent 94:5
in patients, both young and old. Care needs to be taken during 21. Fernando Zarone et al : Dynamometric assessment of the
mechanical resistance of porcelain veneers related to tooth
tooth preparation and particularly during the luting phase to
preparation: A comparison between two techniques. J Prosthet
ensure maximal results are obtained for the patient. Dent 2006,95:5.
22. Barghi et al,Effects of porcelain leucite content, types of
REFERENCES etchants, and etching time on porcelain-composite bond. J of
1. Pincus CR. Building mouth personality. Journal of South Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry, 2006, 18(1), 47-52.
California Dental Association 1938;14:125-9. 23. Sailer I et al. Clinical study of the color stability of the veneering
2. Buonocore,MG.:a simple methode of increasing thr adhesion of ceramics for zirconia frameworks.Int J Prosthodont 2007; 20(3),
acrylic filling material to enamel surface. J.D.R. :34,849,1955. 263-269.
3. Faunce FR, Myers DR: Laminate veneer restoration of 24. Sturdevant C.M. et al. : The Art and Science of Operative
permanent incisors. J Am Dent Assoc 1976;93:790-792. Dentistry, Third Edition, C.V. Mosby Co. 1995
4. Faunce FR: tooth restorstion with preformed laminate veneers. 25. Horn HR: Porcelain laminate venners bonded to etched
Dent Survey 1977;1:30-32. enamel.Dent Clin North Am 1983;27:671-684.
5. Rochette EAL: attachment of splint to enamel of lower anterior 26. McLaughlin G : Porcelain fused to tooth- A new esthetic and
teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1973;30:481-423. reconstructive modality. Compend Contin Educ Dent
1984;5:430-435.
6. Horn H: A new lamination: Porcelain bonded to enamel. NY
State Dent J 1983;49:401-403. 27. Sandesh M Mayekar , Shades of a colour – illusion or reality?.
DCNA. January 2001, 45 (1) 155 -173.
7. Calamia JR: etched porcelain facial veneers:a new treatment
modality based on scientific and clinical evidence. NY J Dent 28. Walls Awg, Steele Jg & Wassell Rw, Crowns And Extra Coronal
1983;53:255-259. Restorations: Porcelain Laminate Veneers,Bdj,Vol-193, No-2,
July 27,2002,73-82
8. Simonsen RJ, Calamia JR: tensile bond strength of etched
porcelain[abstract 1154]. J Dent Res 1983;62:297. 29. William J O’Brien – Dental Materials, Quintessence Publishing
Co.1989
9. Calamia JR, Simonsen RJ: Effect of coupling agents on bond
strength of etched porcelain[abstract 79]. J Dent Res 30. Goldstein RE, Change your smile – 3 rd Edition , Quintessence
1984;63:179. Publishing Co, Inc 1997,123
Asian Journal of Oral Health & Allied Sciences 2012, Volume 2, Issue 1 25