Persons and Family Relations
Persons and Family Relations
Effectivity of laws
GENERAL RULE: Laws take effect 15 days following the completion of its publication
EXCEPTION: Unless otherwise provided by the law. This refers to the 15 day period and NOT to the requirement of publication. (Tanada vs. Tuvera)
NOTE: Administrative rules and regulations must also be published if their purpose is to enforce or implement existing laws pursuant to a valid delegation.
The publication must be in full since its purpose is to inform the public of the contents of the law. (Phil. Int’l Trading Corp. vs. Angeles)
considered a CONCLUSIVE presumption and applies only to mandatory and prohibitory laws. (Consunji vs. CA)
Non-retroactivity of laws
EXCEPTIONS: (UCIPELT)
2. Curative statutes
3. Interpretative statutes
4. Procedural/remedial
5. Emergency laws
7. Tax laws
GENERAL RULE: Acts which are contrary to mandatory or prohibitory laws are void.
EXCEPTIONS:
1. When the law itself authorized its validity (ex. lotto, sweepstakes)
2. When the law makes the act only voidable and not void (ex. voidable contracts where consent is vitiated)
3. When the law makes the act valid but punishes the violator (ex. marriage solemnized by a person without legal authority)
Waiver of rights
Requisites: (EKI)
1. Existence of a right
EXCEPTIONS:
1. If the waiver is contrary to law, public order, public policy, morals or good customs (LPPMG)
NOTE: A stipulation requiring the recipient of a scholarship grant to waive his right to transfer to another school, unless he refunds the equivalent of his
scholarship in cash is null and void. The school concerned obviously understands scholarship awards as a business scheme designed to increase the business
potential of an educational institution. Thus, conceived, it is not only inconsistent with sound policy, but also with good morals. (Cui vs. Arellano
University)
Laws applicable
laws of the Philippines will govern upon ALL those who live or sojourn in it
2. Laws relating to family rights and duties, or to the status, condition and legal capacity of persons
laws of the Philippines will govern its citizens, regardless of their residence
EXCEPTION: When a marriage between a Filipino citizen and a foreigner is validly celebrated and a divorce is thereafter validly obtained abroad by the
alien spouse capacitating him or her to remarry, the Filipino spouse shall likewise have the capacity to remarry under Philippine law. ( Article 26(2) Family
Code)
NOTE: domiciliary rule supplants the nationality rule in cases involving stateless persons
3. Laws on property
NATIONALITY
DOMICILIARY RULE
RULE
Basis for basis for
determining determining
personal law of an personal law of an
individual is individual is
his domicile his citizenship
Art. 26, par. 2 of Family Code (CIAO) 1. Art. 26, par. 1 of Family Code (marriage involving Filipinos
solemnized abroad, when such are void in the Philippines)
1. Capacity to succeed
2. Intrinsic validity of contracts
2. Intrinsic validity of the will
4. Order of succession
Renvoi Doctrine
Where the conflict rules of the forum refer to a foreign law, and the latter refers it back to the internal law, the latter (law of the forum) shall
apply.
NOTE: If the foreign law refers it to a third country, the said country’s laws shall govern, and is referred to as the transmission theory.
The foreign law, whenever applicable, should be proved by the proponent thereof; otherwise, such law shall be presumed to be exactly the same as the
law of the forum.
GENERAL RULE: Prohibitive laws concerning persons, their acts or property and laws which have for their object public order, public policy or good
customs are notrendered
Human Relations
Every person must, in the exercise of his rights and in the performance of his duties, act with justice, give everyone his due, and observe
honesty and good faith. (Art. 19 of NCC)
3. For the sole intent of prejudicing or injuring another. (Albenson Ent. Corp. vs. CA)
Every person who, contrary to law, willfully or negligently causes damage to another, shall indemnify the latter for the same. (Art. 20 of NCC)
Any person who willfully causes loss or injury to another in a manner that is contrary to morals, good customs or public policy shall compensate the latter
for the damage. (ART. 21 of NCC)
NOTE: Art. 21 deals with acts contra bonus mores, and has the following elements:
Arts. 19, 20 and 21 are related to each other and, under these articles, an act which causes injury to another may be made the basis for an award
of damages.
There is a common element under Arts. 19 and 21, and that is, the act must be done intentional. However, Art. 20 does not distinguish, the act may be
done either “willfully” or “negligently.” (Albenson Ent. Corp. vs. CA)
The SC in Pe vs. Pe, applying Art. 21 ruled that a married man had seduced a girl through an ingenious and tricky scheme, i.e. on the pretext of
teaching her how to pray the rosary, to the extent of making her fall in love with him. Verily, he has committed an injury to the girl’s family in a manner
contrary to morals, good customs and public policy.
However, in Tanjanco vs. CA, the SC denied the award of moral damages based on the fact that for one year, from 1958-1959, the plaintiff, a woman of
adult age, maintained intimate sexual relations with defendant, with repeated acts of intercourse. Such conduct is incompatible with the idea of seduction.
Plainly, there is here voluntariness and mutual passion; for had the plaintiff been deceived, had she surrendered exclusively because of the deceit, artful
persuasions and wiles of defendant, she would not have again yielded to his embraces, much less for one year without exacting early fulfillment of the
alleged promises of marriage and would have cut short all sexual relations upon finding that defendant did not intend to fulfill his promises. Hence, no case
is made under Art. 21 of Civil Code.
While a breach of promise to marry is not actionable, it has been held that to formally set a wedding and go through and spend for all the wedding
preparation and publicity, only to walk out of it when the matrimony was about to be solemnized is a different matter. This palpably and unjustifiably
contrary to good customs for which the defendant must be held answerable for damages in accordance with Art. 21 of the Civil Code. (Wassmer vs. Velez)
The obligation of cohabitation of husband and wife is not enforceable by contempt proceedings. In private relations, physical coercion is barred under
the the old maxim – “Nemo potest preciso cogi ad factum.” However, the refusal of the wife to perform her wifely duties, her denial of consortium and her
desertion of her husband would certainly constitute a willful infliction of injury upon her husband’s feelings in a manner which is contrary to morals, good
customs and public policy for which Arts. 21 and 2210 (10) of the CC authorize an award for moral damages. (Tenchavez vs. Escano)
Prejudicial Question
GENERAL RULE: If both criminal and civil cases are filed in court, the criminal case takes precedence.
EXCEPTION: When there is a prejudicial question or a question that arises in a case, the resolution of which is a logical antecedent of the issue involved
herein, and the cognizance of which pertains to another tribunal.
a. Previously instituted civil action involves an issue similar or intimately related to the issue raised in the subsequent criminal action, and
b. The resolution of such issue determines whether or not the criminal action may proceed
PERSONS
CIVIL PERSONALITY
CAPACITY TO ACT
JURIDICAL CAPACITY
Fitness to be the subject of legal Power to do act with legal effects
relations
Passive Active
Inherent Merely acquired
Lost only through death Lost through death and other causes
Can exist without capacity to act Cannot exist without juridical capacity
Cannot be limited or restricted Can be restricted, modified or limited
THEORIES ON CAPACITY TO ACT
THEORY OF
THEORY OF GENERAL CAPACITIES
SPECIAL CAPACITIES
Applies to natural persons Applies to juridical persons
One has the ability to do all things with legal effects except only in This limits the power of juridical persons only to those that are expressly conferred
those specific circum-stances where the capacity to act is upon them or those which can be implied therefrom or incidental thereto
restrained
Natural persons
EXCEPTION: The law considers the conceived child as born for all purposes favorable to it if born alive. Therefore, the child has a presumed personality,
which has two characteristics:
1. limited; and
NOTES:
The presumption as to the child’s personality applies only in cases beneficial to the child.
The concept of provisional personality CANNOT be invoked to obtain damages for and in behalf of an aborted child. (Geluz vs. CA)
GENERAL RULE: For civil purposes, the fetus is considered born if it is alive at the time it is completely delivered from the mother’s womb.
EXCEPTION: If the fetus had an intrauterine life of less than 7 months, it is not deemed born if it dies within 24 hours after its complete delivery from
the maternal womb.
Presumption of survivorship
Two or more persons, called to succeed each other, shall be presumed to have died at the same time, subject to the following conditions:
NOTE: Article 43 applies when the parties are called to succeed each other. But if the parties are not called to succeed each other, Rule 131, Sec. 3 (jj) of
the Rules of Court applies. Both are to be applied only in the absence of facts.
Juridical persons
WHO:
HOW CREATED: For (a) and (b), by the laws creating or recognizing them; private corporations are governed by BP 68 and partnership and associations are
governed by the provisions of this Code concerning partnerships.
NOTE: The Roman Catholic Church is a corporation by prescription, with acknowledged juridical personality, inasmuch as it is an institution which
antedated, by almost a thousand years, any other personality in Europe, and which existed when Grecian eloquence still flourished in Antioch and when
idols where still worshipped in the temple of Mecca. (Barlin vs. Ramirez)
The estate of a deceased person should be considered an artificial or juridical person for the purposes of the settlement and distribution of his
estate which, of course, include the exercise during the judicial administration thereof of those rights and the fulfillment of those obligations of his which
survived after his death. (Limjoco vs. Intestate Estate of Pedro Fragrante)
DOMICILE
RESIDENCE
Used to indicate a PLACE OF ABODE, whether permanent or denotes a FIXED PERMANENT RESIDENCE, which when absent, one has
temporary the intention of returning
There can be several places of residence There can only be ONE place of domicile
Elements of Domicile
Kinds of Domicile
II. FAMILY CODE
MARRIAGE
A special contract of permanent union between a man and a woman entered into in accordance with law for the establishment of conjugal and
family life. Its nature, consequences and incidents are fixed by law and cannot be the subject of stipulation.
1. Legal capacity of the contracting parties, who must be a male and a female
2. Valid Marriage License
3. Marriage ceremony where the contracting parties appear before the solemnizing officer, with their personal declaration that the take each other as
husband and wife in the presence of not less than two witnesses of legal age
Effects:
The is marriage voidable
3. Irregularity in any of the formal requisites
Does NOT affect the validity of the marriage BUT will hold the party responsible for such irregularity liable
3. members of the judiciary
EXCEPTIONS:
3. marriage at a house or place designated by the parties with the written request to the solemnizing officer
1. among Muslims or members of ethnic cultural communities, provided such were solemnized in accordance with their customs, rites and practices
2. solemnized outside the Phil. where NO marriage license is required by the country where they were solemnized
3. of a man and a woman who have lived together as husband and wife for at least 5 years and without legal impediment to marry each other
4. in articulo mortis
5. in remote places
NOTE: The 5-year period should be computed on the basis of a cohabitation as husband and wife where the only missing factor is the marriage contract
to validate the union. This 5-year period should be the years immediately before the day of the marriage and it should be a period of cohabitation
characterized by exclusivity- meaning no third party was involved at any time within the 5 years and continuity - that is unbroken (Ninal vs. Bayadog,
GR No. 133778 March 14, 2000).
NOTE: In the case of Manzano vs. Sanchez (G.R. No. MTJ-00-1329, March 08, 2001), the Supreme Court laid down the requisites to avail the exemption
under Article 34 of the Family Code:
a. The man and woman must have been living together as husband and wife for at least five years before the marriage;
b. The parties must have no legal impediment to marry each other;
c. The fact of absence of legal impediment between the parties must be present at the time of marriage;
d. The parties must execute an affidavit stating that they have lived together for at least five years [and are without legal impediment to marry
each other; and
e. The solemnizing officer must execute a sworn statement that he had ascertained the qualifications of the parties and that he had found no
legal impediment to their marriage
NOTE: A marriage license is valid only for 120 days from date of issue, in any part of the Philippines.
Foreign Marriages
Validity of marriage:
GENERAL RULE: Where one or both parties to the marriage are citizens of the Philippines, the foreign marriage is valid in this country if solemnized in
accordance with the laws of the country of celebration.
EXCEPTIONS: Foreign marriages shall not be recognized in the Philippines if prohibited because: (MABB-PIP)
4. contracted following the annulment or declaration of nullity of a previous marriage but before partition
6. incestuous
Validity of divorce:
GENERAL RULE: A divorce validly obtained abroad by the alien spouse, capacitating him/her to remarry can allow the Filipino to remarry.
EXCEPTION: The rule will not apply if the divorce was obtained by the Filipino spouse.
NOTE: A Filipino wife remains the lawful wife of the Filipino husband despite a decree of divorce obtained abroad by the wife. However, if the wife is
already a foreigner at the time of the divorce, she ceases to be the lawful wife of the Filipino husband. This, notwithstanding, if at the time of the
marriage the wife was still a Filipino, and subsequently acquires citizenship of another country, thereby rendering her to have the legal capacity to obtain a
decree of divorce, the Filipino husband remains a spouse of the former. This situation is not covered by Art. 26, par.2 which requires that, at the time of
the marriage, one of the parties is already an alien.
VOID MARRIAGES
2. solemnized by any person not legally authorized to perform marriages unless one or both of the parties believed in good faith that the solemnizing
officer had the legal authority to do so
5. marriages contracted through mistake of one of the parties as to the identity of the other
6. subsequent marriages that are void under Article 53 of the Family Code
5. between the surviving spouse of the adopting parent & the adopted child
9. between parties where one, with the intention to marry the other, killed the latter’s spouse, or his/her spouse.
NOTE: Under the FC, the following can now marry each other:
3. where the spouse was presumed dead, and both the present spouse and would-be spouse were in bad faith in contracting marriage (Article 44)
NOTE: Where there was failure to record in the civil registry and registry of property the judgment of annulment or of absolute nullity of the marriage,
partition and distribution of the property of the spouses and the delivery of the children’s presumptive legitimes it shall not affect third persons (Articles
52-53).
NOTE: Even if a marriage is void, it must be declared void first because the parties cannot decide for themselves the invalidity of their marriage.
VOID VOIDABLE
Decree of nullity Decree of annulment
Never be ratified Ratified by free cohabitation
Attacked directly or collaterally Attacked directly only
Co-ownership Conjugal Partnership
Always void Valid until annulled
Action for declaration of nullity does not prescribe Action prescribes
Psychological Incapacity
no exact definition but is restricted to psychological incapacity “to comply with the essential marital obligations of marriage”
involves a senseless, protracted and constant refusal to comply with the essential marital obligations by one or both of the spouses although he, she
or they are physically capable of performing such obligations (Chi Ming Tsoi vs. CA)
Essential elements: (MAVFFCCI)
a. Mental condition
b. Applies to a person who is maritally contracted to another
6. marital obligations refer to Art. 68-71 of FC as well as Art. 220,221 and 225 of the FC
7. interpretations of the National Appellate Matrimonial Tribunal of the Catholic Church of the Philippines while not controlling should be given great
respect.
8. trial court must order the prosecuting attorney or fiscal and the Solicitor General to appear for the state.
JUDICIAL OF DECLARATION OF NULLITY
The absolute nullity of a previous marriage may be invoked for purposes of remarriage on the basis solely of a final judgment declaring such
previous marriage void.
NOTES:
For purposes of remarriage, the only legally acceptable basis for declaring a previous marriage an absolute nullity is a final judgment declaring such
previous marriage void, whereas, for purposes other than remarriage, other evidence is acceptable. (Domingo vs. CA)
In a case for concubinage, the accused need not present a final judgment declaring his marriage void for he can adduce evidence in the criminal case
of the nullity of his marriage other than proof of a final judgment declaring his marriage void. Hence, the pendency of the civil action for nullity of
marriage does not pose a prejudicial question in a criminal case for concubinage.
Parties to the marriage should not be permitted to judge for themselves its nullity, for the same must be submitted to the judgment of the
competent courts and only when the nullity of the marriage is so declared can it be held as void, and so long as there is no such declaration, the
presumption is that the marriage exists for all intents and purposes. Therefore, he who cohabits with a woman not his wife, before the judicial
declaration of nullity of the marriage, assumes the risk of being prosecuted for concubinage. (Beltran vs. People, June 20, 2000)
BIGAMOUS MARRIAGES
GENERAL RULE: A marriage contracted by any person during the subsistence of a previous valid marriage shall be null and void.(Gomez vs. Lipana)
EXCEPTIONS: When the following conditions concur, the subsequent bigamous marriage shall be valid:
1. absence of the other spouse must have been for four consecutive years, or two years where there was danger of death
2. well-founded belief of the present spouse that absent spouse was already dead
1. Children of the subsequent marriage conceived prior to its termination shall be considered legitimate;
2. The absolute community or conjugal partnership shall be dissolved and liquidated. If either spouse acted in bad faith, his/her share in the net
profits shall be forfeited:
3. Donations by reason of the marriage remain valid except if the donee contracted the marriage in bad faith;
4. The innocent spouse may revoke the designation of the spouse in bad faith as the beneficiary in any insurance policy; and
5. The spouse who contracted the subsequent marriage in bad faith shall be disqualified to inherit from the innocent spouse by testate or intestate
succession.
NOTE: The above effects apply in voidable bigamous marriages. Except for (1), the above effects also apply to marriages which are annulled or declared
void ab initiounder Art. 40 of the Code.
Requisites: (MR-BF)
1. That the absentee spouse has been missing for 4 consecutive years or 2 consecutive years if the disappearance occurred where there is danger of
death under circumstances laid down in Art.391 of the NCC
4. The present spouse files a summary proceeding for the declaration of presumptive death.
NOTE: The present spouse must establish that he had a well-founded belief required by law that his absent wife was already dead that would sustain the
issuance of a court order declaring presumptive death. In the case of RP vs. Nolasco, The SC believed that respondent Nolasco failed to conduct a search
for his missing wife with such diligence as to give rise to a “well-founded belief” that she is dead. When he arrived in San Jose, Antique after learning of his
wife’s departure, instead of seeking the help of local authorities or of the British embassy, he secured another seaman’s contract and went to London, a
vast city of many millions of inhabitants, to look for her there. (RP vs. Nolasco)
GENERAL RULE: The subsequent bigamous marriage under Article 41 remains valid despite reappearance of the absentee spouse.
EXCEPTION: If the reappearance was made in a sworn statement recorded in the civil registry, the subsequent marriage is “automatically terminated.”
EXCEPTION TO THE EXCEPTION: If there was a previous judgment annulling or declaring the first marriage a nullity, the subsequent bigamous marriage
remains valid.
VOIDABLE MARRIAGES
Grounds: (UP-FAVS)
1. Age of the party in whose behalf it is sought to have the marriage annulled was 18 years of age or over but below 21, and the marriage was
solemnized without the consent of the parents, guardian or person exercising substitute parental authority over the party, in that order, and both lived
together as husband and wife;
5. Physical incapability of either party to consummate the marriage with the other, and such incapacity continues and appears to be incurable
NOTE: Mode of ratification for Nos. 1-4 is COHABITATION. In Nos. 5 & 6, there is no ratification to speak of since the defect is permanent. The latter can
be convalidated only by prescription, i.e. 5 years from the date of marriage. Specifically, in no.5, the healthy spouse may still annul the marriage within
5yrs. after celebration.
1. Non-disclosure of a previous conviction by final judgment of the other party of a crime involving moral turpitude;
2. Concealment by the wife of the fact that at the time of the marriage, she was Pregnant by a man other than her husband;
3. Concealment of a Sexually transmissible disease, regardless of its nature, existing at the time of the marriage; and
4. Concealment of Drug addiction, habitual alcoholism, homosexuality or lesbianism existing at the time of the marriage.
NOTES:
Misrepresentation as to character, health, rank, fortune or chastity is not a ground for annulment.
The enumeration in Article 46 is EXCLUSIVE. (Anaya vs. Palaroan)
3. incapability to consummate Injured party w/in 5 years after the celebration of the marriage
4. Insanity (a) sane spouse who has no knowledge of the insanity (a) anytime before the death of either party
(b) relatives, guardians or persons ha-ving legal charge (b) anytime before the death of either party
of the insane
(c) during lucid interval or after regaining sanity
(c) insane spouse
5. Non- consent (a) parent/ legal guardian having charge of the “no- (a) anytime before the “no consent” party reaches 21
consent” party
(b) w/in 5 years after reaching 21
(b) ”no consent “ party
6. STD Injured party w/in 5 years after the celebration of the marriage
NOTE: In Nos. 1, 2, 4, and 5, when cohabitation takes place after the defect ceases to exist, the prescriptive period is rendered moot and academic.
Whichever comes first may convalidate the marriage: Cohabitation or Prescription.
c. incurable
presumption that the husband is impotent should the wife still remain a virgin after 3 years of living together with her husband.
NOTES:
There will be collusion only if the parties had arranged to make it appear that a ground existed or had been committed although it was not, or if the
parties had connived to bring about a matrimonial case even in the absence of grounds therefore. (Ocampo vs. Florenciano)
A grant of annulment of marriage or legal separation by default is fraught with danger of collusion. If the defendant spouse fails to answer the
complaint, the court cannot declare him or her in default but instead, should order the prosecuting attorney to determine if collusion exists between
the parties.
However, petitioner’s vehement opposition to the annulment proceedings negates the conclusion that collusion existed between the parties. Under
these circumstances, the non-intervention of a prosecuting attorney to assure lack of collusion between the contending parties is not fatal to the
validity of the proceedings in the trial court. (Tuason vs. CA, GR 116607, April 10, 1996)
RULE ON DECLARATION OF ABSOLUTE NULLITY OF VOID MARRIAGES AND ANNULMENT OF VOIDABLE MARRIAGES (A.M. 00-11-01-SC)
for a more comprehensive discussion on the procedural aspects of the Rule, please refer to the Remedial Law Memory Aid.
LEGAL SEPARATION
Grounds: (SAMBA-LIPAD)
1. repeated physical violence or grossly abusive conduct directed against the petitioner, a common child, or a child of the petitioner
2. attempt of the respondent to corrupt or induce the petitioner, a common child, or a child of the petitioner, to engage in prostitution, or
connivance in such corruption or inducement
4. final judgment sentencing the respondent to imprisonment of more than 6 years even if pardoned
7. abandonment of the petitioner by the respondent without justifiable cause for more than 1 year
8. physical violence or moral pressure to compel petitioner to change religious or political affiliation
NOTES:
Cooling-off Period – 6 months period designed to give the parties enough time to further contemplate their positions with the end in view of
attaining reconciliation between them.
The enumeration in Article 55 regarding legal separation is EXCLUSIVE. (Lacson vs. San Jose-Lacson)
a. Condonation -NOTE: failure of the husband to look for his adulterous wife is NOT condonation to wife's adultery. (Ocampo vs. Florenciano)
b. Consent
c. Connivance
d. Collusion
e. Mutual Guilt
f. Prescription
g. Death of either party during the pendency of the case (Lapuz-Sy vs. Eufemio)
Effects of filing petition:
b. The husband shall have no more right to have sexual intercourse with his wife.
c. In the absence of an agreement between the parties, the court shall designate the husband, the wife, or a 3 rd person to manage the absolute
community or conjugal partnership property.
a. The spouses shall be entitled to live separately from each other but the marriage bond is not severed.
c. The custody of the minor children shall be awarded to the innocent spouse subject to the provisions of Art. 213 of the Code.
d. The offending spouse shall be disqualified from inheriting from the innocent spouse by intestate succession and the provisions in favor of the
offending spouse made in the will of the innocent spouse shall be revoked by operation of law.
e. The innocent spouse may revoke the donations made by him/her in favor of the offending spouse, as well as the designation of the latter as
beneficiary in any insurance policy, even if the designation be irrevocable.
Effects of Reconciliation of the Spouses:
a. The legal separation proceedings, if still pending, shall thereby be terminated at whatever stage.
b. The final decree of legal separation shall be set aside, but the separation of property and any forfeiture of share of the guilty spouse already
effected shall subsist, unless the spouses agree to revive their former property regime.
(A.M. 02-11-11-SC)
this Rule shall govern petitions for legal separation under the Family Code in the Philippines; the Rules of Court shall apply suppletorily
please refer to the Remedial Law Memory Aid for the procedural provisions of the Rule
(JL-FORM)
1. live together
Exercise of Profession
GENERAL RULE: Husband & wife can engage in any lawful enterprise or profession without the consent of the other.
EXCEPTION: Upon objection of the other spouse only on valid, serious and moral grounds, may the former’s consent be necessary.
Governed by:
MARRIAGE SETTLEMENTS
It is a contract entered into by the future spouses fixing the matrimonial property regime that should govern during the existence.
Requisites:
6. additional signatories
1. 18-21: parents
2. civil interdictees & disabled: guardian
3. contrary stipulation
Requisites: (COBB)
2. in consideration of marriage
EXCEPTIONS:
NOTE: This rule also applies to common-law spouses. (Article 87, Family Code)
5. complied Resolutory condition
The property regime of the spouses in the absence of a marriage settlement or when the marriage is void. This is so because it is more in keeping
with Filipino culture.
GENERAL RULE: Community property shall consist of all property owned by the spouses at the time of the marriage or acquired thereafter.
EXCEPTIONS: (BEG)
1. property acquired before the marriage by either spouse who has legitimate descendants by a former marriage
3. property acquired during the marriage by gratuitous title, except when the donor, testator or grantor expressly provides otherwise
NOTE: No waiver of rights allowed during the marriage except in case of judicial separation of property. The waiver must be in a public instrument.
EXCEPTIONS:
a. Disposition
b. encumbrance
LOSS: Shall be borne by the loser-spouse and shall not be charged to the community property
1. Inventory
First, pay out of community assets, if not enough, husband and wife are solidarily liable
It is that formed by a husband and wife whereby they place in a common fund the fruits of their separate property, and the income from their work
or industry, the same to be divided between them equally (as a general rule) upon the dissolution of the marriage or the partnership.
2. acquired by chance
5. acquired through occupation
3. acquired by right of redemption, barter or exchange with property belonging to either spouse
1. Reverse Accession – if the cost of the improvement and the plus value is more than the value of the principal property at the time of the
improvement, the property becomes conjugal
2. Accession – if the cost of the improvement of the plus value is equal to or less than the value of the principal property at the time of the
improvement, the entire property becomes the exclusive property of the spouse.
NOTE: Property bought on installments paid partly from exclusive funds of the spouses and partly form conjugal funds:
1. If full ownership was vested before the marriage – it shall belong to the buyer-spouse
2. If full ownership was vested during the marriage - it shall belong to the conjugal partnership
3. Debts and obligations without marital consent provided the family was benefited;
4. All taxes, liens, charges and expenses including major or minor repairs upon the community or conjugal property;
NOTE: However, in conjugal partnership, actual use need not be proved because it is presumed.
5. All taxes and expenses for mere preservation made during the marriage upon the exclusive property of either spouse used by the family;
7. Ante-nuptial debts of either spouse insofar as they have redounded to the benefit of the family;
8. The value of what is donated or promised by both spouses in favor of their common legitimate children for education or self-improvement; and
NOTES:
The separate properties shall be solidarily and subsidiarily liable for the obligations if the community or conjugal properties are insufficient.
The absolute community property shall also be liable for ante-nuptial debts mentioned above, support of illegitimate children, and liabilities
incurred by either spouse by reason of a crime or quasi-delict in case of insolvency of the exclusive property of the debtor-spouse. Payment of which
shall be advanced by the absolute community property, subject to deduction from the share of the debtor-spouse.
The conjugal partnership property shall likewise be liable for the payment of the personal debts of either spouse insofar as they have redounded to
the benefit of the family.
Indirect benefits that might accrue to a husband in his signing a surety or guarantee agreement not in favor of the family but in favor of his employer
corporation are not the benefits that can be considered as giving a direct advantage accruing to the family. Hence, the creditors cannot go against the
conjugal partnership property of the husband in satisfying the obligation subject of the surety agreement. A contrary view would put in peril the
conjugal partnership property by allowing it to be given gratuitously as in cases of donation of conjugal partnership property, which is
prohibited. (Ayala Investment Corp. vs. CA)
4. judicial separation of property
Causes: (CLAAPS)
a. petitioner’s spouse has been sentenced with a penalty which carries with it civil interdiction;
d. abandonment by the petitioner’s spouse and failure to comply with the obligations to the family;
f. at the time of the petition, spouses are separated in fact for at least 1 year and the possibility for reconciliation is highly improbable.
NOTE: The spouses contribute to the family expenses proportionately with their income and the value of their properties. However, the liability of the
spouses to the creditors for family expenses is solidary.
Property Acquired by Both Parties Governed by the rules on co-ownership Owned by them in common in proportion to their
respective contributions
Presumption (prima facie) Presumption of joint acquisition andequal sharing as to property No presumption of joint acquisition. When there is
acquired while they live together. evidence of joint acquisition but none as to
the extent of actual contribution, there is a
presumption of equal sharing.
Forfeiture When only one of the parties is in good faith, the share of the party If one of the parties is validly married to another,
in bad faith in the co-ownership shall be forfeited: his/her share in the co-ownership shall accrue to
the absolute community or conjugal partnership
a. in favor of their common children; or existing in such valid marriage.
NOTE: Under Art. 148, only the properties acquired by both of the parties through their actual joint contribution of money, property or industry shall be
owned by them in proportion to their respective contributions. It must be stressed that actual contribution is required by this provision, in contrast to
Art. 147 which state that efforts in the care and maintenance of the family and household, are regarded as contributions to the acquisition of common
property by one who has no salary or income or work or industry. If the actual contribution of the party is not proved, there will be no co-ownership and
no presumption of equal shares. (Agapay vs. Palang). Hence, mere cohabitation without proof of contribution will not result in a co-ownership. (Tumlos
vs. Fernandez).
THE FAMILY
Basic social institution which public policy cherishes and protect hence, no suit between members of the family shall prosper unless the compromise
between the parties have failed
FAMILY HOME
GENERAL RULE: The family home is exempt from execution, forced sale or attachment.
EXCEPTIONS: (PLMN)
Guidelines:
3. must be permanent
4. rule applies to valid and voidable and even to common-law spouses under Articles 147 and 148
5. continues despite death of one or more spouses or unmarried head of the family for 10 years, or as long as a minor beneficiary lives
-Status is legitimate child, provided both husband and wife authorized or ratified the insemination in a written instrument which they executed and signed
before
GENERAL RULE: Only those who are conceived or born during a valid marriage
EXCEPTIONS: (CAVALAC)
3. Conceived or born before judgment of annulment or absolute nullity under Art. 36 has become final & executory
5. Of mothers who may have declared against its legitimacy or was sentenced as an adultress
6. Legally adopted
7. Legitimated, conceived and born outside of wedlock of parents without impediment at the time of conception and had subsequently married
Illegitimate Children
GENERAL RULE: Those conceived and born outside a valid marriage are illegitimate.
1. born of marriages which are void ab initio such as bigamous and incestuous marriages and marriage was declared void for being contrary to law
and public policy
1. physical impossibility of the husband to have sexual intercourse with his wife within the 1 st 120 days of the 300 days immediately preceding the
child’s birth, due to:
a. physical incapacity of the husband;
2. biological or scientific proof that the child could not have been that of the husband; and
3. written authorization or ratification of either parent for artificial insemination was obtained through mistake, fraud, violence, intimidation or undue
influence.
1. one year, from knowledge of birth or recording in the civil register, if husband or heirs lives in the SAME city/municipality
C. Parties
EXCEPTION: The heirs, if the husband dies before the end of the prescription of the action, or after filing complaint, or child was born after death
NOTE: The question of legitimacy cannot be collaterally attacked, it can be impugned only in a direct action.
Rule on the Status of Children born after 300 days following Termination of Marriage
A. Requisites (TS-WBN)
1. first marriage terminated
3. subsequent marriage was contracted within 300 days after termination of previous marriage
4. child was born
1. to first marriage, if child was born before the lapse of 180 days after celebration of 2 nd marriage provided born within 300 days after termination of
the 1stmarriage.
2. to second marriage, if child was born after 180 days following celebration of 2 nd marriage whether born within 300 days after termination of
1st marriage or afterwards.
Proof of Filiation
GENERAL RULE: Filiation of legitimate (or illegitimate) children is established by any of the following:
2. An admission of legitimate (or illegitimate) filiation in a public document or a private handwritten instrument and signed by the parent concerned.
EXCEPTION: In the absence of any of the foregoing evidence, such legitimate or illegitimate filiation shall be proved by:
2. Any other means allowed by the Rules of Court and special laws.
NOTES:
Continuous does not mean that the concession of status shall continue forever but only that it shall not be of an intermittent character while it is
continuous. The possession of such status means that the father has treated the child as his own, directly and not through others, spontaneously and
without concealment though without publicity. There must be a showing of permanent intention of the supposed father to consider the child as his own
by continuous and clear manifestation of paternal affection and care. (Mendoza vs. CA). The paternal affection and care must not be attributed to pure
charity. “Such acts must be of such a nature that they reveal not only the conviction of paternity, but also the apparent desire to have and treat the
child as such in all relations in society and in life, not accidentally, but continuously.” (Jison vs. CA)
The SC in Lim vs. CA, ruled that petitioner was the father of his illegitimate children because the evidences convincingly show this. Hence, it was
the petitioner who paid the bills for the hospitalization of the mother when she gave birth. He was the one who caused the registration of the name of
the child using his surname in the birth certificate. He also wrote handwritten letters to the mother and the child stating his promise “to be a loving
and caring husband and father to both of you.” There were also pictures of the petitioner on various occasions cuddling the child.
In view of the fact that filiation may be proved by “any means allowed by the Rules of Court and special laws” this may consist of baptismal
certificate, a judicial admission, a family bible in which his name has been entered, common reputation respecting his pedigree, admission by silence,
the testimony of witnesses and such other kinds of proof admissible under Rule 130 of RC. (Mendoza vs. CA) For a baptismal certificate to be proof of
filiation under the Rules of Court, it must be shown that the father therein participated in the preparation of the same. A birth certificate not signed by
the alleged father indicated in said certificate is not competent evidence of paternity. (Fernandez vs. CA)
Proof of filiation of petitioners to the late Enrique Baluyut is not sufficient to confer upon them any hereditary right in the estate of the deceased.
What is necessary to be established by an illegitimate not natural child in order that he may be entitled to successional rights under Art 887 of NCC, is
not the fact of his bare filiation but a filiation acknowledged by the putative parent.(Baluyut vs. Baluyut)
ILLEGITIMATE
LEGITIMATE
Use of father & mother’s surname Use of mother‘s surname
Entitled to the legitime & other successional rights Legitime is ½ of the legitime of a legitimate child
An Act Allowing Illegitimate Children to use the surname of their Father, amending for the purpose Article 176 of EO No. 209, otherwise known as
the "FAMILY CODE OF THE PHILIPPINES":
Approved February 24, 2004
1. their filiation has been expressly recognized by the father through the record of birth appearing in the civil register, or
2. when an admission in a public document or private handwritten instrument is made by the father
LEGITIMATION
Requisites: (NIM)
b. The parents at the time of the child’s conception are not disqualified from marrying each other
ADOPTION
1. Filipino Citizen:
a. of legal age
b. in a position to support and care for his/her children in keeping with the means of the family
2. Alien:
c. has been living in the Phil. for at least three (3) continuous years prior to the application for adoption and maintains such residence until the
adoption decree is entered, except when
1) former Filipino citizen who seeks to adopt a relative within the 4 th degree of consanguinity or affinity
2) one who seeks to adopt the legitimate or illegitimate child of his/her Filipino spouse
3) one who is married to a Filipino citizen and seeks to adopt jointly with his/her spouse a relative within the 4 th degree of consanguinity or
affinity of the Filipino spouse
e. certified by said office that his government allows the adoptee to enter his/her country as his/her adopted child
3. Guardian – with respect to the ward after termination of the guardianship and clearance of his/her financial accountabilities
Pre-Adoption Services
1. counselling services for the biological parents, prospective adoptive parents and prospective adoptee
2. exhaust all efforts to locate the biological parents, if unkown
EXCEPTIONS:
1. any person below 18 years of age who has been voluntarily committed to the DSWD under P.D. 603 or judicially declared available for adoption
2. legitimate stepchild
3. illegitimate stepchild
4. qualified adult, who, prior to the adoption, has been consistently considered by the adopter as his/her own child since minority;
6. child whose biological or adoptive parents have died, provided that no proceedings shall be initiated within 6 months from the time of death of said
parents
Consent in Adoption (BAILAS)
4. the illegitimate children, 10 years old or over, of the adopter if living with the adopter and the latter's spouse
a decree of adoption shall be effective as of the date the original petition was filed. It applies also in case the petitioner(s) dies before the issuance of
the decree of adoption to protect the interest of the adoptee.
NOTE: Where the petition for adoption was granted after the child had shot and killed a girl, the SC did not consider the retroactive effect to the decree
of adoption so as to impose a liability upon the adopting parents accruing at the time when the adopting parents had no actual or physical custody over the
adopted child. Retroactive effect may perhaps be given to the granting of the petition for adoption where such is essential to permit the accrual of some
benefit or advantage in favor of the adopted child. To hold that parental authority had been retroactively lodged in the adopting parents so as to burden
them with liability for a tortious act that they could not have foreseen and which they could have prevented would be unfair and unconscionable. (Tamargo
vs. CA 209 S 518)
Effects of Adoption: (SAL)
1. Severance of legal ties between the biological parents and the adoptee and the same shall be vested in the adopters.
2. Adoptee shall be considered as a legitimate child of the adopter(s) for all intents and purposes.
3. In legal or intestate succession, the adoptee and the adopter(s) shall have reciprocal rights of succession without distinction from legitimate
filiation. However, if there is a will, the rules on testamentary succession shall be followed.
Rescission of Adoption
Grounds: (ASAR)
NOTES:
Only the adoptee is given the right to rescind the decree of adoption
The adopter can NOT rescind the decree of the adoption but he or she may disinherit the adoptee.
Effects:
a. Parental authority of adoptee’s biological parents or legal custody of DSWD shall be restored if adoptee is still a minor or incapacitated.
b. Reciprocal rights and obligations of the adopter(s) and the adoptee to each other shall be extinguished.
c. The amended certificate of birth of the adoptee shall be cancelled and its original shall be restored.
d. Succession rights shall revert to its status prior to the adoption, but vested rights shall not be affected.
Inter-Country Adoption
The socio-legal process of adopting a Filipino child by a foreigner or a Filipino citizen permanently residing abroad where the petition is filed, the
supervised trial custody is undertaken, and the decree of adoption is issued outside the Philippines.
NOTE: “Legally-free Child” - a child who has been voluntarily or involuntarily committed to the DSWD of the Philippines, in accordance with the Child
Youth and Welfare Code.
b. No child shall be matched to a foreign adoptive family unless it is satisfactorily shown that the child cannot be adopted locally.
Any alien or Filipino citizen permanently residing abroad may file an application for inter-country adoption of a Filipino child if he/she:
1. is at least 27 years of age and at least 16 years older than the child to be adopted, at the time of the application unless the adopter is the parent
by nature of the child to be adopted or the spouse of such parent
3. has the capacity to act and assume all rights and responsibilities of parental authority under his national laws, and has undergone the appropriate
counselling from an accredited counsellor in his/her country
6. is in a position to provide the proper care and support and to give the necessary moral values and example to all his children, including the child
to be adopted
7. agrees to uphold the basic rights of the child as embodied under Philippine laws, the U.N. Convention on the Rights of a Child, and to abide by the
rules and regulations issued to implement the Inter-Country Adoption Act
8. comes from a country with whom the Philippines has diplomatic relations and whose government maintains a similarly authorized and accredited
agency and that adoption is allowed under his/her national laws
9. possesses all the qualifications and none of the disqualifications under the Inter-Country Adoption Act and other applicable Philippine laws
The Board shall ensure that all possibilities for the adoption of the child under the Family Code have been exhausted and that inter-country adoption
is in the best interest of the child.
Trial Custody:
1. starts upon actual physical transfer of the child to the applicant who, as actual custodian, shall exercise substitute parental authority over the
person of the child.
2. the adopting parent(s) shall submit to the governmental agency or authorized and accredited agency, which shall in turn transmit a copy to the
Board, a progress report of the child’s adjustment.
NOTES:
If the pre-adoptive relationship is found unsatisfactory by the child or the applicant or both, or if the foreign adoption agency finds that the
continued placement of the child is not in the child’s best interest, said relationship shall be suspended by the Board and the foreign adoption agency
shall arrange for the child’s temporary care.
If a satisfactory pre-adoptive relationship is formed between the applicant and the child, the Board shall submit the written consent to the adoption
to the foreign adoption agency within 30 days after receipt of the latter’s request.
A copy of the final decree of adoption of the child, including certificate of citizenship/naturalization whenever applicable, shall be transmitted by
the foreign adoption agency to the Board within 1 month after its issuance.
NOTE: For a comprehensive discussion of the procedural aspects of adoption, please refer to A.M. No. 02-06-02-SC or the Remedial Law Memory Aid
SUPPORT
everything indispensable for sustenance, dwelling, clothing, medical attendance, education and transportation in keeping with the financial capacity
of the family
Kinds: (LJC)
Characteristics: (PIN-ERV)
1. Personal
2. Intransmissible
5. Reciprocal on the part of those who are by law bound to support each other
6. Variable
Persons obliged to support each other:
1. spouses
3. parents and their legitimate children and the legitimate and illegitimate children of the latter
4. parents and their illegitimate children and the legitimate and illegitimate children of the latter
NOTE: Support shall be in proportion to the resources or means of the giver and to the necessities of the recipient.
1. spouse
NOTES:
When the obligation to give support falls upon 2 or more persons payment shall be divided between them in proportion to the resources of each, but
in case of urgent need and special circumstances, the court may order one of them to furnish the support provisionally subject to the right to claim
from the other obligors the share due them
When two or more recipients at the same time claim for support and the obligor does not have sufficient means to satisfy all claims:
1. The father and the mother shall JOINTLY exercise parental authority over the persons of their common children. In case of disagreement, the
father’s decision shall prevail UNLESS there is a judicial order to the contrary
the natural parents, who are of good character and who can reasonably provide for the child are ordinarily entitled to custody as against all persons
GENERAL RULE: No child under 7 years of age shall be separated from the mother.
NOTE: Paramount consideration in matters of custody of a child is the welfare and well-being of the child. (Tonog vs. CA)
Persons Exercising Substitute PA:
1. surviving grandparent
Persons Exercising Special PA:
1. school
NOTES:
Parental authority and responsibility are inalienable and may not be transferred and renounced except in cases authorized by law.
PROFECTITIOUS
ADVENTITIOUS
1. earned or acquired by the child through his work or industry by onerous or gratuitous title 1. property given by the parents to the child for the latter to administer
Termination of PA
TEMPORARY
PERMANENT
1. death of the parents 1. adoption of the child
5. acts of lasciviousness, allowed for the child to be subjected to, or himself subjects the child to
FUNERALS
GENERAL GUIDELINES
1. duty and right to make arrangement in funerals in accordance with Article 199, FC
2. the funeral shall be in keeping with the social position of the deceased
3. the funeral shall be in accordance with the expressed wishes of the deceased
a. in the absence of the expressed wishes, his religious beliefs or affiliation shall determine
4. any person who disrepects the dead or allows the same shall be liable for damages
Grounds for Change of First Name or Nickname under R.A. No. 9048 (An act authorizing City or Municipal Civil Registrar or the Consul General to
Correct a Clerical or Typographical Error in an Entry and/or Change of First Name or Nickname in the Civil Registrar Without need of a Judicial Order,
Amending for this Purpose Articles 376 and 412 of the Civil Code))
1. The petitioner finds the first name or nickname to be ridiculous, tainted with dishonour or extremely difficult to write or pronounce
2. The new first name or nickname has been habitually and continuously used by the petitioner and he has been publicly known by that first name or
nickname in the community
NOTE: Please refer to Remedial Law Memory Aid for a comprehensive discussion of the procedural aspects of change of name.
ABSENCE
DECLARATION OF ABSENCE
WITH ADMINISTRATOR
WITHOUT ADMINISTRATOR
2 years from the lapse of time without news about the absentee or 5 years from the lapse of time without news about the absentee or
since the receipt of the last news since the receipt of the last news
PRESUMPTION OF DEATH
c. person in danger of death under other circumstances and his existence has not been
known