RECOLETOS LAW CENTER

University of San Jose-Recoletos

Practice answering the following Bar Questions by emphasizing or citing the KEY
WORDS:

(Income Taxation)

1. Differentiate tax exclusions from tax deductions. (2019 Bar)

2. B transferred his ownership over a 1,000-square meter commercial land and three-door
apartment to ABC Corp., a family corporation of which B is a stockholder. The transfer
was in exchange of 10,000 shares of stock of ABC Corp. As a result, B acquired 51 %
ownership of ABC Corp., with all the shares of stock having the right to vote. B paid no
tax on the exchange, maintaining that it is a tax avoidance scheme allowed under the
law. The Bureau of Internal Revenue, on the other hand, insisted that B's alleged
scheme amounted to tax evasion.

Should B pay taxes on the exchange? Explain.(2019 Bar)

3. GHI, Inc. is a corporation authorized to engage in the business of manufacturing ultra-

high density microprocessor unit packages. After its registration on July 5, 2005, GHI,
Inc. constructed buildings and purchased machineries and equipment. As of December
31, 2005, the total cost of the machineries and equipment amounted to
₱250,000,000.00. However, GHI, Inc. failed to commence operations. Its factory was
temporarily closed effective September 15, 2010. On October 1, 2010, it sold its
machineries and equipment to JKL Integrated for ₱300,000,000.00. Thereafter, GHI, Inc.
was dissolved on November 30, 2010.

(a) Is the sale of the machineries and equipment to JKL Integrated subject to
normal corporate income tax or capital gains tax? Explain.

(b) Distinguish an ordinary asset from a capital asset.(2019 Bar)

4. Mr. D, a Filipino amateur boxer, joined an Olympic qualifying tournament held in Las
Vegas, USA, where he won the gold medal. Pleased with Mr. D's accomplishment, the
Philippine Government, through the Philippine Olympic Committee, awarded him a cash
prize amounting to ₱1,000,000.00. Upon receipt of the funds, he went to a casino in
Pasay City and won the ₱30,000,000.00 jackpot in the slot machine. The next day, he
went to a nearby Lotto outlet and bought a Lotto ticket which won him a cash prize of
₱5,000.00.

Which of the above sums of money is/are subject to income tax? Explain. (2019
Bar)

5. JKL-Philippines is a domestic corporation affiliated with JKL-Japan, a Japan-based

information technology company with affiliates across the world. Mr. F is a Filipino
engineer employed by JKL-Philippines. In 2018, Mr. F was sent to the Tokyo branch of
JKL-Japan based on a contract entered into between the two (2) companies. Under the
said contract, Mr. F would be compensated by JKL-Philippines for the months spent in
the Philippines, and by JKL-Japan for months spent in Japan. For the entirety of 2018,
Mr. F spent ten (10) months in the Tokyo branch.
6. On the other hand, Mr. J, a Japanese engineer employed by JKL-Japan, was sent to
Manila to work with JKL-Philippines as a technical consultant. Based on the contract
between the two (2) companies, Mr. J's annual compensation would still be paid by JKL-
Japan. However, he would be paid additional compensation by JKL-Philippines for the
months spent working as a consultant. For 2018, Mr. J stayed in the Philippines for five
(5) months.
7. In 2019, the Bureau of Internal Revenue (BIR) assessed JKL-Philippines for deficiency
withholding taxes for both Mr. F and Mr. J for the year 2018. As to Mr. F, the BIR argued
that he is a resident citizen; hence, his income tax should be based on his worldwide
1
 income. As to Mr. J, the BIR argued that he is a resident alien; hence, his income tax
should be based on his income from sources within the Philippines at the schedular rate
under Section 24 (A) (2) of the Tax Code, as amended by Republic Act No. 10963, or
the "Tax Reform for Acceleration and Inclusion" Law.

(a) ls the BIR correct in basing its income tax assessment on Mr. F's worldwide
income? Explain.

(b) Is the BIR correct in basing its income tax assessment on Mr. J's income
within the Philippines at the schedular rate? Explain. (2019 Bar)

8. As a way to augment the income of the employees of DEF, Inc., a private corporation,
the management decided to grant a special stipend of ₱50,000.00 for the first vacation
leave that any employee takes during a given calendar year. In addition, the senior
engineers were also given housing inside the factory compound for the purpose of
ensuring that there are available engineers within the premises every time there is a
breakdown in the factory machineries and equipment.

(a) Is the special stipend part of the taxable income of the employees receiving the
same? If so, what tax is applicable and what is the tax rate? Explain.

(b) Is the cash equivalent value of the housing facilities received by the senior
engineers subject to fringe benefits tax? Explain. (2019 Bar)

9. Mr. C is employed as a Chief Executive Officer of MNO Company, receiving an annual

compensation of ₱10,000,000.00, while Mr. S is a security guard in the same company
earning an annual compensation of ₱200,000.00. Both of them source their income only
from their employment with MNO Company.

(a) At the end of the year, is Mr. C personally required to file an annual income tax
return? Explain.

(b) How about Mr. S? Is he personally required to file an annual income tax
return? Explain. (2019 Bar)

10. (a) Differentiate between a calendar year and a fiscal year.

(b) When is the deadline for the filing of a corporation's final adjustment return for
a calendar year? How about for a fiscal year? (2019 Bar)

11. XYZ Corp. is listed as a top 20,000 Philippine corporation by the Bureau of Internal
Revenue. It secured a loan from ABC Bank with a 6% per annum interest. All interest
payments made by XYZ Corp. to ABC Bank is subject to a 2% creditable withholding
tax. At the same time, XYZ Corp. has a trust deposit with ABC Bank in the amount of
₱100,000,000.00, which earns 2% interest per annum, but is subject to a 20% final
withholding tax on the interest income received by XYZ Corp.

(a) Who are the withholding agents in the case of: 1. the 20% final withholding tax;
and 2. the 2% creditable withholding tax? Explain.

(b) When is the deadline for filing a judicial claim for refund for any excess or
erroneous taxes paid in the case of: 1. the 20% final withholding tax; and 2. the 2%
creditable withholding tax? (2019 Bar)

12. Vanderful, lnc.'sincome tax return for taxable year 2015 showed an overpayment due
to excess creditable withholding taxes in the amount of P750,000.00. The company
opted to carry over the excess income tax credits as tax credit against its quarterly
income tax liabilities for the next succeeding years. For taxable year 2016, the
company'sincome tax return showed an overpayment due to excess creditable
withholding taxes in the amount of P1,100,000.00, which included the carry-over
from year 2015 in the amount of P750,000.00 because its operations resulted in a net
loss; hence, there was no application for any tax liability. This time, the company
opted and marked the box "To be refunded' in respect of the total amount of
2
 P1,100,000.00.

Vanderful, Inc. now files in the BIR a claim for refund of unutilized overpayments
of P1,100,00.00. Is the claim meritorious? (2017 Bar)

13. Mapagbigay Corporation grants all its employees (rank and file, supervisors, and
managers) 5% discount of the purchase price of its products. During an audit
investigation, the BIR assessed the company the corresponding tax on the amount
equivalent to the courtesy discount received by all the employees, contending that
the courtesy discount is considered as additional compensation for the rank and file
employees and additional fringe benefit for the supervisors and managers. In its
defense, the company argues that the discount given to the rank and file employees
is a de minimis benefit and not subject to tax. As to its managerial employees, it
contends that the discount is nothing more than a privilege and its availment is
restricted.

Is the BIR assessment correct? Explain. (2016 Bar)

14. Congress issued a law allowing a 20% discount on the purchases of senior citizens
from, among others, recreation centers. This 20% discount can then be used by the
sellers as a "tax credit." At the initiative of BIR, however, Republic Act No. (RA)
9257 was enacted amending the treatment of the 20% discount as a "tax deduction."
Equity Cinema filed a petition with the RTC claiming that RA 9257 is
unconstitutional as it forcibly deprives sellers a part of the price without just
compensation.

[a] What is the effect of converting the 20% discount from a "tax credit" to a
"tax deduction"?

[b] If you are the judge, how will you decide the case? Briefly explain your
answer. (2016 Bar)

15. Peter is the Vice-President for Sales of Golden Dragon Realty Conglomerate, Inc.
(Golden Dragon). A group of five (5) foreign investors visited the country for
possible investment in the condominium units and subdivision lots of Golden
Dragon. After a tour of the properties for sale, the investors were wined and dined by
Peter at the posh Conrad's Hotel at the cost of Pl 50,000.00. Afterward, the investors
were brought to a party in a videoke club which cost the company P200,000.00 for
food and drinks, and the amount of P80,000.00 as tips for business promotion
officers. Expenses at Conrad's Hotel and the videoke receipted club were and
submitted to support the deduction for representation and entertainment expenses.
Decide if all the representation and entertainment expenses claimed by Golden
Dragon are deductible. Explain. (2016 Bar)

16. Henry, a U.S. naturalized citizen, went home to the Philippines to reacquire
Philippine citizenship under RA 9225. His mother left him a lot and building in
Makati City and he wants to make use of it in his trading business. Considering that
he needs money for the business, he wants to sell his lot and building and make use
of the consideration. However, the lot has sentimental value and he wants to
reacquire it in the future. A friend of Henry told him of the "sale-leaseback
transaction" commonly used in the U.S., which is also used for tax reduction. Under
said transaction, the lot owner sells his property to a buyer on the condition that he
leases it back from the buyer. At the same time, the property owner is granted an
option to repurchase the lot on or before an agreed date. Henry approaches you as a
tax lawyer for advice.

3
 Explain what tax benefits, if any, can be obtained by Henry and the buyer from
the sale-leaseback transaction? (2016 Bar)

17. Patrick is a successful businessman in the United States and he is a sole proprietor of
a supermarket which has a gross sales of $10 million and an annual income of $3
million. He went to the Philippines on a visit and, in a party, he saw Atty. Agaton
who boasts of being a tax expert. Patrick asks Atty. Agaton: if he (Patrick) decides to
reacquire his Philippine citizenship under RA 9225, establish residence in this
country,a and open supermarket in Makati City, will the BIR tax him on the income
he earns from his U.S. business? If you were Atty. Agaton, what advice will you give
Patrick? (2016 Bar)

18. Rakham operates the lending company that made a loan to Alfonso in the amount of
Pl20,000.00 subject of a promissory note which is due within one (1) year from the
note's issuance. Three years after the loan became due and upon information that
Alfonso is nowhere to be found, Rakham asks you for advice on how to treat the
obligation as "bad debt." Discuss the requisites for deductibility of a "bad debt?"
(2016 Bar)

8. Mr. A, a citizen and resident of the Philippines, is a professional boxer. In a

professional boxing match held in 2013, he won prize money in United States (US)
dollars equivalent to P300,000,000.

a) Is the prize money paid to and received by Mr. A in the US taxable in

the Philippines? Why?

b) May Mr. A's prize money qualify as an exclusion from his gross
income? Why?

c) The US already imposed and withheld income taxes from Mr. A's prize
money. How may Mr. A use or apply the income taxes he paid on his
prize money to the US when he computes his income tax liability in the
Philippines for 2013? (2015 Bar)

9. Ms. C, a resident citizen, bought ready-to-wear goods from Ms. B, a nonresident

citizen.

a) If the goods were produced from Ms. B's factory in the Philippines, is
Ms. B's income from the sale to Ms. C taxable in the Philippines? Explain.

b) If Ms. B is an alien individual and the goods were produced in her

factory in China, is Ms. B's income from the sale of the goods to Ms. C
taxable in the Philippines? Explain. (2015 Bar)

10. BBB, Inc., a domestic corporation, enjoyed a particularly profitable year in 2014. In
June 2015, its Board of Directors approved the distribution of cash dividends to its
stockholders. BBB, Inc. has individual and corporate stockholders. What is the tax
treatment of the cash dividends received from BBB, Inc. by the following stockholders:

a) A resident citizen

4
 b) Non-resident alien engaged in trade or business

c) Non-resident alien not engaged in trade or business

d) Domestic corporation

e) Non-resident foreign corporation (2015 Bar)

11. Indicate whether each of the following individuals is required or not required to file
an income tax return:

a) Filipino citizen residing outside the Philippines on his income from

sources outside the Philippines.

b) Resident alien on income derived from sources within the Philippines.

c) Resident citizen earning purely compensation income from two

employers within the Philippines, whose income taxes have been correctly
withheld.

d) Resident citizen who falls under the classification of minimum wage

earners.

e) An individual whose sole income has been subjected to final

withholding tax.

12. What are de minimis benefits and how are these taxed? Give three (3) examples of de
minimis benefits. (2015 Bar)

13. Mr. H decided to sell the house and lot wherein he and his family have lived for the
past 10 years, hoping to buy and move to a new house and lot closer to his children's
school. Concerned about the capital gains tax that will be due on the sale of their house,
Mr. H approaches you as a friend for advice if it is possible for the sale of their house to
be exempted from capital gains tax and the conditions they must comply with to avail
themselves of said exemption. How will you respond? (2015 Bar)

14. GGG, Inc. offered to sell through competitive bidding its shares in HHH Corp.,
equivalent to 40% of the total outstanding capital stock of the latter. JJJ, Inc. acquired the
said shares in HHH Corp. as the highest bidder. Before it could secure a certificate
authorizing registration/tax clearance for the transfer of the shares of stock to JJJ, Inc.,
GGG, Inc. had to request a ruling from the BIR confirming that its sale of the said shares
was at fair market value and was thus not subject to donor's tax. In BIR Ruling No. 012-
14, the CIR held that the selling price for the shares of stock of HHH Corp. was lower
than their book value, so the difference between the selling price and the book value of
said shares was a taxable donation. GGG, Inc. requested the Secretary of Finance to
review BIR Ruling No. 012-14, but the Secretary affirmed said ruling. GGG, Inc. filed
with the Court of Appeals a Petition for Review under Rule 43 of the Revised Rules of
Court. The Court of Appeals, however, dismissed the Petition for lack of jurisdiction
declaring that it is the CTA which has jurisdiction over the issues raised. Before which
Court should GGG, Inc. seek recourse from the adverse ruling of the Secretary of Finance
in the exercise of the latter's power of review? (2015 Bar)

5
15. KKK Corp. secured its Certificate of Incorporation from the Securities and Exchange
Commission on June 3, 2013. It commenced business operations on August 12, 2013. In
April 2014, Ms. J, an employee of KKK Corp. in charge of preparing the annual income
tax return of the corporation for 2013, got confused on whether she should prepare
payment for the regular corporate income tax or the minimum corporate income tax.

a) As Ms. J's supervisor, what will be your advice?

b) What are the distinctions between regular corporate income tax and
minimum corporate income tax? (2015 Bar)

16. In 2012, Dr. K decided to return to his hometown to start his own practice. At the end
of 2012, Dr. K found that he earned gross professional income in the amount of
P1,000,000.00; while he incurred expenses amounting to P560,000.00 constituting mostly
of his office space rent, utilities, and miscellaneous expenses related to his medical
practice. However, to Dr. K's dismay, only P320,000.00 of his expenses were duly
covered by receipts. What are the options available for Dr. K so he could maximize the
deductions from his gross income? (2015 Bar)

17. Dr. Taimtim is an alumnus of the College of Medicine of Universal University (UU),
a privately-owned center for learning which grants yearly dividends to its stockholders.

UU has a famous chapel located within the campus where the old folks used to
say that anyone who wanted to pass the medical board examinations should offer a dozen
roses on all the Sundays of October. This was what Dr. Taimtim did when he was still
reviewing for the board examinations. In his case, the folk saying proved to be true
because he is now a successful cardiologist. Wanting to give back to the chapel and help
defray the costs of its maintenance, Dr. Taimtim donated P50,000.00 to the
caretakers of the chapel which was evidenced by an acknowledgment receipt.

In computing his net taxable income, can Dr.Taimtim use his donation to the chapel as an
allowable deduction from his gross income under the National Internal Revenue Code
(NIRC)? (2014 Bar)

18. Mr. Gipit borrowed from Mr. Maunawain P100,000.00, payable in five (5) equal
monthly installments. Before the first installment became due, Mr. Gipit rendered general
cleaning services in the entire office building of Mr. Maunawain, and as compensation
therefor, Mr. Maunawain cancelled the indebtedness of Mr. Gipit up to the amount of
P75,000.00. Mr. Gipit claims that the cancellation of his indebtedness cannot be
considered as gain on his part which must be subject to income tax, because according to
him, he did not actually receive payment from Mr. Maunawain for the general cleaning
services. Is Mr. Gipit correct? Explain. (2014 Bar)

19. Which of the following is an exclusion from gross income?

(A) Salaries and wages

(B) Cash dividends
(C) Liquidating dividends after dissolution of a corporation
(D) De minimis benefits
(E) Embezzled money (2014 Bar)

20. Triple Star, a domestic corporation, entered into a Management Service Contract
with Single Star, a non-resident foreign corporation with no property in the Philippines.
Under the contract, Single Star shall provide managerial services for Triple Star’s
Hongkong branch. All said services shall be performed in Hongkong.

6
Is the compensation for the services of Single Star taxable as income from sources within
the Philippines? Explain. (2014 Bar)

21. Which of the following should not be claimed as deductions from gross income?
(A) discounts given to senior citizens on certain goods and services.
(B) advertising expense to maintain some form of goodwill for the taxpayer’s
business.
(C) salaries and bonuses paid to employees.
(D) interest payment on loans for the purchase of machinery and equipment
used in business. (2014 Bar)

22. Hopeful Corporation obtained a loan from Generous Bank and executed a mortgage
on its real property to secure the loan. When Hopeful Corporation failed to pay the loan,
Generous Bank extrajudicially foreclosed the mortgage on the property and acquired the
same as the highest bidder. A month after the foreclosure, Hopeful Corporation exercised
its right of redemption and was able to redeem the property. Is Generous Bank liable to
pay capital gains tax as a result of the foreclosure sale? Explain. (2014 Bar)

23. On August 31, 2014, Haelton Corporation (HC), thru its authorized representative
Ms. Pares, sold a 16-storey commercial building known as Haeltown Building to Mr.
Belly for P100 million. Mr. Belly, in turn, sold the same property on the same day to Bell
Gates, Inc. (BGI) for P200 million. These two (2) transactions were evidenced by two (2)
separate Deeds of Absolute Sale notarized on the same day by the same notary public.

Investigations by the Bureau of Internal Revenue (BIR) showed that:

(1) the Deed of Absolute Sale between Mr. Belly and BGI was notarized ahead of the sale
between HC and Mr. Belly; (2) as early as May 17, 2014, HC received P40 million from
BGI, and not from Mr. Belly; (3) the said payment of P40 million was recorded by BGI in
its books as of June 30, 2014 as investment in Haeltown Building; and (4) the substantial
portion of P40 million was withdrawn by Ms. Pares through the declaration of cash
dividends to all its stockholders.

Based on the foregoing, the BIR sent Haeltown Corporation a Notice of Assessment for
deficiency income tax arising from an alleged simulated sale of the aforesaid commercial
building to escape the higher corporate income tax rate of thirty percent (30%). What is
the liability of Haeltown Corporation, if any? (2014 Bar)

24. A, B, and C, all lawyers, formed a partnership called ABC Law Firm so that they can
practice their profession as lawyers. For the year 2012, ABC Law Firm received earnings
and paid expenses, among which are as follows:

Earnings:

(1) Professional/legal fees from various clients

(2) Cash prize received from a religious society in recognition of the
exemplary service of ABC Law Firm
(3) Gains derived from sale of excess computers and laptops

Payments:

(1) Salaries of office staff

(2) Rentals for office space
(3) Representation expenses incurred in meetings with clients

(A) What are the items in the above mentioned earnings which should be
included in the computation of ABC Law Firm’s gross income? Explain.
7
 (B) What are the items in the above-mentioned payments which may be
considered as deductions from the gross income of ABC Law Firm?
Explain.
(C) If ABC Law Firm earns net income in 2012, what, if any, is the tax
consequence on the part of ABC Law Firm insofar as the payment of
income tax is concerned? What, if any, is the tax consequence on the part
of A, B, and C as individual partners, insofar as the payment of income
tax is concerned? (2014 Bar)

25. Freezy Corporation, a domestic corporation engaged in the manufacture and sale of
ice cream, made payments to an officer of Frosty Corporation, a competitor in the ice
cream business, in exchange for said officer’s revelation of Frosty Corporation’s trade
secrets.

May Freezy Corporation claim the payment to the officer as deduction from its gross
income? Explain.( 2014 Bar)

26. In January 2013, your friend got his first job as an office clerk. He is single and lives
with his family who depends upon him for financial support. His parents have long
retired from their work, and his two (2) siblings are still minors and studying in grade
school. In February 2014, he consulted you as he wanted to comply with all the rules
pertaining to the preparation and filing of his income tax return. He now asks you the
following:

(A) Is he entitled to personal exemptions? If so, how much?

(B) Is he entitled to additional exemptions? If so, how much?
(C) What is the effect of the taxes withheld from his salaries on his taxable
income? (2014 Bar)

27. In its final adjustment return for the 2010 taxable year, ABC Corp. had excess tax
credits arising from its over-withholding of income payments. It opted to carry over the
excess tax credits to the following year. Subsequently, ABC Corp. changed its mind and
applied for a refund of the excess tax credits.
Will the claim for refund prosper? (2013 Bar)

29. A group of philanthropists organized a non-stock, non-profit hospital for charitable

purposes to provide medical services to the poor. The hospital also accepted paying
patients although none of its income accrued to any private individual; all income were
plowed back for the hospital's use and not more than 30% of its funds were used for
administrative purposes.
Is the hospital subject to tax on its income? If it is, at what rate? (2013 Bar)

30. Atty. Gambino is a partner in a general professional partnership. The partnership

computes its gross revenues, claims deductions allowed under the Tax Code, and
distributes the net income to the partners, including Atty. Gambino, in accordance with
its articles of partnership.

In filing his own income tax return, Atty. Gambino claimed deductions that the
partnership did not claim, such as purchase of law books, entertainment expenses, car
insurance and car depreciation. The BIR disallowed the deductions.

Was the BIR correct?

31. XYZ Law Offices, a law partnership in the Philippines and a VAT-registered
taxpayer, received a query by e-mail from Gainsburg Corporation, a corporation
organized under the laws of Delaware, but the e-mail came from California where
8
Gainsburg has an office. Gainsburg has no office in the Philippines and does no business
in the Philippines.

XYZ Law Offices rendered its opinion on the query and billed Gainsburg
US$1,000 for the opinion. Gainsburg remitted its payment through Citibank which
converted the remitted US$1 ,000 to pesos and deposited the converted amount in the
XYZ Law Offices account.

What are the tax implications of the payment to XYZ Law Offices in terms of VAT and
income taxes? (2013 Bar)

32. In 2000, Mr. Belen bought a residential house and lot for PI ,000,000. He used the
property as his and his family's principal residence. It is now year 2013 and he is
thinking of selling the property to buy a new one. He seeks your advice on how much
income tax he would pay if he sells the property. The total zonal value of the property is
P5,000,000 and the fair market value per the tax declaration is P2,500,000. He intends
to sell it for P6,000,000.

What material considerations will you take into account in computing the income tax?
Please explain the legal relevance of each of these considerations. (2013 Bar)

33. ABC Corp. was dissolved and liquidating dividends were declared and paid to the
stockholders.

What tax consequence follows?

(A) ABC Corp. should deduct a final tax of 10% from the dividends.

(B) The stockholders should declare their gain from their investment and pay
income tax at the ordinary rates.
(C) The dividends are exempt from tax.
(D) ABC Corp. should withhold a 10% creditable tax. (2013 Bar)

34. MGC Corp. secured an income tax holiday for 5 years as a pioneer industry. On the
fourth year of the tax holiday, MGC Corp. declared and paid cash dividends to its
stockholders, all of whom are individuals.

Are the dividends taxable?

(A) The dividends are taxable; the tax exemption of MGC Corp. does not
extend to its stockholders.
(B) The dividends are tax exempt because of MGC Corp.'s income tax
holiday.
(C) The dividends are taxable if they exceed 50% of MGC Corp.'s retained
earnings.
(D) The dividends are exempt if paid before the end of MGC Corp.'s fiscal
year. (2013 Bar)

35. Kenya International Airlines (KIA) is a foreign corporation, organized under the
laws of Kenya. It is not licensed to do business in the Philippines. Its commercial
airplanes do not operate within Philippine territory, or service passengers
embarking from Philippine airports. The firm is represented in the Philippines by
its general agent, Philippine Airlines (PAL), a Philippine corporation.

9
 KIA sells airplane tickets through PAL, and these tickets are serviced by KIA
airplanes outside the Philippines. The total sales of airline tickets transacted by
PAL for KIA in 1997 amounted to P2,968,156.00. The Commissioner of Internal
Revenue assessed KIA deficiency income taxes at the rate of 35% on its taxable
income, finding that KIA’s airline ticket sales constituted income derived from
sources within the Philippines.

KIA filed a protest on the ground that the P2,968,156.00 should be considered as
income derived exclusively from sources outside the Philippines since KIA only
serviced passengers outside Philippine territory.

Is the position of KIA tenable? Reasons. (2009 Bar)

36. Raffy and Wena, husband and wife, are both employed by XXX Corporation.
After office hours, they jointly manage a coffee shop at the ground floor of their
house. The coffee shop is registered in the name of both spouses. Which of the
following is the correct way to prepare their income tax return? Write the letter
only. DO NOT EXPLAIN YOUR ANSWER.

a. Raffy will declare as his income the salaries of both spouses, while Wena will
declare the income from the coffee shop.

b. Wena will declare the combined compensation income of the spouses, and
Raffy will declare the income from the coffee shop.

c. All the income will be declared by Raffy alone, because only one consolidated
return is required to be filed by the spouses.

d. Raffy will declare his own compensation income and Wena will declare hers.
The income from the coffee shop shall be equally divided between them. Each
spouse shall be taxed separately on their corresponding taxable income to be
covered by one consolidated return for the spouses.

e. Raffy will declare his own compensation income and Wena will declare hers.
The income from the coffee shop shall be equally divided between them.
Raffy will file one income tax return to cover all the income of both spouses,
and the tax is computed on the aggregate taxable income of the spouses.
(2009 Bar)

37. YYY Corporation engaged the services of the Manananggol Law Firm in 2006 to
defend the corporation’s title over a property used in the business. For the legal
services rendered in 2007, the law firm billed the corporation only in 2008. The
corporation duly paid. YYY Corporation claimed this expense as a deduction
from gross income in its 2008 return, because the exact amount of the expense
was determined only in 2008. Is YYY’s claim of deduction proper? Reasons.
(2009 Bar)

38. Ernesto, a Filipino citizen and a practicing lawyer, filed his income tax return for
2007 claiming optional standard deductions. Realizing that he has enough
documents to substantiate his profession-connected expenses, he now plans to file
an amended income tax return for 2007, in order to claim itemized deductions,
since no audit has been commenced by the BIR on the return he previously filed.
Will Ernesto be allowed to amend his return? Why or why not? (2009 Bar)

10
39. Johnny transferred a valuable 10-door commercial apartment to a designated
trustee, Miriam, naming in the trust instrument Santino, Johnny’s 10-year old son,
as the sole beneficiary. The trustee is instructed to distribute the yearly rentals
amounting to P720,000.00. The trustee consults you if she has to pay the annual
income tax on the rentals received from the commercial apartment.

a. What advice will you give the trustee? Explain.

b. Will your advice be the same if the trustee is directed to accumulate the rental
income and distribute the same only when the beneficiary reaches the age of
majority? Why or why not? (2009 Bar)

40. Masarap Food Corporation (MFC) incurred substantial advertising expenses in

order to protect its brand franchise for one of its line products. In its income tax
return, MFC included the advertising expense as deduction from gross income,
claiming it as an ordinary business expense. Is MFC correct? Explain. (2009
Bar)

41. In January 1970, Juan Gonzales bought one hectare of agricultural

land in Laguna for P100,000. This property has a current fair market
value of P10 million in view of the construction of a concrete road
traversing the property. Juan Gonzales agreed to exchange his
agricultural lot in Laguna for a one-half hectare residential property
located in Batangas, with a fair market value of P10 million, owned by Alpha
Corporation, a domestic corporation engaged in the purchase and sale of real
property. Alpha Corporation acquired the property in 2007 for P9 million.

a) What is the nature of the real properties exchanged for tax

purposes – capital asset or ordinary asset? Explain.

b) Is Juan Gonzales subject to income tax on the exchange of

property? If so, what is the tax base and rate? Explain.

c) Is Alpha Corporation subject to income tax on the exchange of

property? If so, what is the tax base and rate? Explain. (2008 Bar)

42. John McDonald, a U.S. citizen residing in Makati City, bought

shares of stock of a domestic corporation whose shares are listed and
traded in the Philippine Stock Exchange at the price of P2 million.
Yesterday, he sold the shares of stock through his favorite Makati
stockbroker at a gain of P200,000.

a) Is John McDonald subject to Philippine income tax on the sale

of his shares through his stockbroker? Is he liable for any other tax?
Explain.

b) If John McDonald directly sold the shares to his best friend, who
is another U.S. citizen residing in Makati, at a gain of P200,000, is he
liable for Philippine income tax? If so, what is the tax base and rate?
(2008 Bar)

43. Pedro Manalo, a Filipino citizen residing in Makati City, owns a vacation

11
 house and lot in San Francisco, California, U.S.A, which he
acquired in 2000 for P15 million. On January 10, 2006, he sold said real
property to Juan Mayaman, another Filipino citizen residing in Quezon
City, for P20 million. On February 9, 2006, Manalo filed the capital gains
tax return and paid P1.2 million representing 6% capital gains tax. Since
Manalo did not derive any ordinary income, no income tax return was
filed by him for 2006. After the tax audit conducted in 2007, the BIR
officer assessed Manalo for deficiency income tax computed as follows:
P5 million (P20 million less P15 million) x 35% = P1.75 million, without
the capital gains tax paid being allowed as tax credit. Manalo consulted a
real estate broker who said that the P1.2 million capital gains tax should
be credited from the P1.75 million deficiency income tax.

a) Is the BIR officer’s tax assessment correct? Explain.

b) If you were hired by Manalo as his tax consultant, what advice

would you give him to protect his interest? Explain. (2008 Bar)

44. In 2007, spouses Renato and Judy Garcia opened peso and dollar

deposits at the Philippine branch of the Hong Kong Bank in Manila.

Renato is an overseas worker in Hong Kong while Judy lives and works
in Manila. During the year, the bank paid interest income of P10,000 on
the peso deposit and US$1,000 on the dollar deposit. The bank withheld
final income tax equivalent to 20% of the entire interest income and
remitted the same to the BIR.

a) Are the interest incomes on the bank deposits of spouses

Renato and Judy Garcia subject to income tax? Explain.

b) Is the bank correct in withholding the 20% final tax on the entire
interest income? Explain. (2008 Bar)

45. What is the “all events test”? Explain briefly. (2010 Bar)

46. What is the immediacy Test? Explain briefly. (2010 Bar)

47. What is the “rational basis test”? Explain briefly (2010 Bar)

48. Mirador, Inc., a domestic corporation, filed its Annual Income Tax Return for

its taxable year 2008 on April 15, 2009. In the Return, it reflected an income tax
overpayment of P1,000,000.00 and indicated its choice to carry-over the
overpayment as an automatic tax credit against its income tax liabilities in
subsequent years. On April 15, 2010, it filed its Annual Income Tax Return for
its taxable year 2009 reflecting a taxable loss and an income tax overpayment for
the current year 2009 in the amount of P500,000.00 and its income tax
overpayment for the prior year 2008 of P1,000,000.00. In its 2009 Return, the
corporation indicated its option to claim for refund the total income tax
overpayment of P1,500,000.00

Choose which of the following statements is correct.

A. Mirador, Inc. may claim as refund the total income tax overpayment of
P1,500,000.00 reflected in its income tax return for its taxable year 2009;

12
 B. It may claim as refund the amount of P500,000.00 representing its income tax
overpayment for its taxable year 2009; or

C. No amount may be claimed as refund.

Explain the basis of your answer. (2010 Bar)

49. A is a travelling salesman working full time for Nu Skin

Products. He receives a monthly salary plus 3% commission on his sales in a

Southern province where he is based. He regularly uses his own car to maximize
his visits even to far flung areas. One fine day a group of militants seized his car.
He was notified the following day by the police that the marines and the militants
had a bloody encounter and his car was completely destroyed after a grenade hit
it. A wants to file a claim for casualty loss. Explain the legal basis of your tax
advice. (2010 Bar)

50. In 2009, Caruso, a resident Filipino citizen, received dividend income from a

U.S.-based corporation which owns a chain of Filipino restaurants in the West

Coast, U.S.A. The dividend remitted to Caruso is subject to U.S. withholding tax
with respect to a non-resident alien like Caruso.

A. What will be your advice to Caruso in order to lessen the

impact of possible double taxation on the same income?

B. Would your answer in A. be the same if Caruso became a

U.S. immigrant in 2008 and had become a non-resident Filipino citizen?

Explain the difference in treatment for Philippine income tax purposes.
(2010 Bar)

51. ABC, a domestic corporation, entered into a software license

agreement with XYZ, a non-resident foreign corporation based in the U.S. Under
the agreement which the parties forged in the U.S., XYZ granted ABC the right to
use a computer system program and to avail of technical know-how relative to
such program. In consideration for such rights, ABC agreed to pay 5% of the
revenues it receives from customers who will use and apply the program in the
Philippines. Discuss the tax implication of the transaction. (2010 Bar)

52. True or False. (1% each)

A) Gains realized by the investor upon redemption of shares of stock in a mutual

fund company are exempt from income tax.

B) A corporation can claim the optional standard deduction equivalent to 40% of

its gross sales or receipts, as the case may be.

13
 C) Premium payment for health insurance of an individual who is an employee in
an amount of P2,500 per year may be deducted from gross income if his gross
salary per year is not more than P250,000.

D) The Tax Code allows an individual taxpayer to pay in two equal installments,
the first installment to be paid at the time the return is filed, and the second on or
before July 15 of the same year, if his tax due exceeds P2,000.

E) An individual taxpayer can adopt either the calendar or fiscal period for
purposes of filing his income tax return.

F) The capitalization rules may be resorted to by the BIR in order to compel

corporate taxpayers to declare dividends to their stockholders regularly.

G) Informer’s reward is subject to a final withholding tax of 10%.

H) A non-resident alien who stays in the Philippines for less than 180 days during
the calendar year shall be entitled to personal exemption not to exceed the amount
allowed to citizens of the Philippines by the country of which he is subject or
citizen. (2010 Bar)

53. Z is a Filipino immigrant living in the United States for more than 10 years. He is
retired

and he came back to the Philippines as a balikbayan. Every time he comes to the
Philippines, he stays here for about a month. He regularly receives a pension from his
former employer in the United States, amounting to US$1, 000 a month. While in the
Philippines, with his pension pay from his former employer, he purchased three
condominium units in Makati which he is renting out for P15, 000 a moth each. 

a. Does the US$1, 000 pension become taxable because he is now residing in the
Philippines? Reason briefly.  
b. Is his purchase of the three condominium units subject to any tax? Reason
briefly. (2007 Bar)

54. Antonia Santos, 30 years old, gainfully employed, is the sister of Edgardo

Santos. She died in an airplane crash. Edgardo is a lawyer and he negotiated with the
airline company and insurance company and they were able to a agree total settlement
of P10 Million. This is what Antonia would have earned as somebody who was
gainfully employed. Edgardo was her only heir. 

a. Is the P10 Million subject to estate tax? Reason briefly.  

b. Should Edgardo report the P10 Million as his income being Antonia’s only heir?
Reason briefly.  (2007 Bar)

55. Nutrition Chippy Corporation gives all its employees (rank and file,

supervisors and managers) one sack of rice every month valued at P800 per sack.
During an audit investigation made by the Bureau of Internal Revenue (BIR), the
BIR assessed the company for failure to withhold the corresponding withholding
tax on the amount equivalent to the one sack of rice received by all the
14
 employees, contending that the sack of rice is considered as additional
compensation for the rank and file employees and additional fringe benefit for the
supervisions and managers. Therefore, the value of the one sack of rice every
month should be considered as part of the compensation of the rank and file
subject to tax. For the supervisors and managers, the employer should be the one
assessed pursuant to Section 33 (a) of the NIRC. Is there a legal basis for the
assessment made by the BIR? Explain your answer. (2007 Bar)

56. Weber Realty Company which owns a three-hectare land in Antipolo entered

into a Joint Venture Agreement (JVA) with Prime Development Company for the
development of said parcel of land. Weber Realty as owner of the land contributed
the land to the Joint Venture and Prime Development agreed to develop the same into
a residential subdivision and construct residential houses thereon. They agreed that
they would divide the lots between them. 

a. Does the JVA entered into by and between Weber and Prime create a separate
taxable entity? Explain briefly.  
b. Are the allocation and distribution of the saleable lots to Weber and prime
subject to income tax and to expanded withholding tax? Explain briefly.  
c. Is the sale by Weber or Prime of their respective shares in the saleable lots to
third parties subject to income tax and to expanded withholding tax? Explain
briefly. (2007 Bar)  

57. Noel Santos is a very bright computer science graduate. He was hired by

Hewlett Packard. To entice him to accept the offer for employment, he was offered
the arrangement that part of is compensation would be an insurance policy with a face
value of P20 Million. The parents of Noel are made the beneficiaries of the insurance
policy. 

a. Will the proceeds of the insurance form part of the income of the parents of
Noel and be subject to income tax? Reason briefly.  
b. Can the company deduct from its gross income the amount of the premium?
Briefly.   (2007 Bar)

58. Charlie, a widower, has two sons by his previous marriage. Charlie lives with

Jane who is legally married to Mario. They have a child named Jill. The children are
all minors and not gainfully employed.

1. How much personal exemption can Charlie claim? Explain.

2. How much additional exemption can Charlie claim? Explain. (2006 Bar)

59. Gold and Silver Corporation gave extra 14th month bonus to all its officials

15
 and employees in the total amount of P75 Million. When it filed its corporate
income tax return the following year, the corporation declared a net operating
loss. When the income tax return of the corporation was reviewed by the BIR the
following year, it disallowed as item of deduction the P75 Million bonus the
corporation gave its officials and employees on the ground of unreasonableness.
The corporation claimed that the bonus is an ordinary and necessary expense that
should be allowed.

If you were the BIR Commissioner, how will you resolve the issue?
(2006 Bar)

60. X, while driving home from his office, was seriously injured when a bus

Driven by a reckless driver bumped from behind his automobile. As a result, he

had to pay P200,000.00 to his doctor and P100,000.00 to the hospital where he
was confined for treatment. He filed a suit against the bus driver and the bus
company and was awarded and paid actual damages of P300,000.00 (for his
doctor and hospitalization bills), P200,000.00 by way of moral damages, and
P50,000.00 for what he had to pay his attorney for bringing his case to court.

Which, if any, of the forgoing awards are taxable income to X and which are not?
Explain. (2005 Bar)

61. A, a doctor by profession, sold in the year 2000 a parcel of land which he bought as
a form of investment in 1990 for P1Million. The land was sold to B, his colleague at a
time when the real estate prices had gone down and so the land was sold only for
P800,000.00, which was then the fair market value of the land. He used the proceeds to
finance his trip to the United States. He claims that he should not be made to pay the 6%
final tax because he did not have any actual gain on the sale. Is his contention correct?
Why? (2001 Bar)

62. Explain briefly whether gain on sale of a car used for personal purpose is taxable on
non-taxable. (2005 Bar)

63. Explain Briefly whether gain arising from expropriation of property is taxable or
non-taxable.

64. Three brothers inherited in 1992 a parcel of land valued for real estate tax purposes
at P3.0Million, which they held in co-ownership. In 1995, they transferred the property
to a newly organized corporation as to their equity, which was placed at the zonal value
of P6.0 Million. In exchange for the property, the three brothers thus each received
shares of stock of the corporation with a total par value of P2.0 Million or, together, a
total of P6.0 Million. No business was done by the corporation and the property
remained idle, In the early part of 1997, one of the brothers, was in dire need of funds,
sold his shares to the two brothers for P2.0 Million.

Is the transaction subject to any internal revenue tax other than the documentary stamp
tax? (1997 Bar)

65. An insolvent company had an outstanding obligation of P100,000.00 from a

creditor. Since it could not pay the debt, the creditor agreed to accept payment through

16
dacion en pago a property, which had a market value of P30,000.00. In the dacion en
pago document, the balance of the debt was condoned.

a) What is the tax effect of the discharge of the unpaid balance of the obligation
on the debtor corporation?

b) Insofar as the creditor is concerned, how is he affected taxwise as a

consequence of the transaction? (1997 Bar)

66. Explain briefly whether recovery of bad debts previously charged off is taxable or
non-taxable. (2005 Bar)

67. What is meant by “tax benefit rule”? Give an illustration of the application of the
tax benefit rule. (2003 Bar)

68. Distinguish a capital asset from an ordinary asset. (2003 Bar)

69. What is the rationale for the rule prohibiting the deduction of capital losses from
ordinary gains? Explain. (2003 Bar)

70. State with reasons the tax treatment of income realized from sale of (i) capital assets;
and (ii) ordinary assets in the preparation of annual income tax returns. (2005 Bar)

71. Mr. Sebastian is a Filipino seaman employed by a Norwegian company, which is

engaged exclusively in international shipping. He and his wife, who manages their
business, filed a joint income tax return, the BIR issued on April 20, 2001 a deficiency
income tax assessment for the sum of P250,000.00, inclusive of interest and penalty. For
failure of Mr. and Mrs. Sebastian to pay the tax within the period stated in the notice of
assessment, the BIR issued on August 19, 2001 warrants of distraint and levy to enforce
collection of the tax.

What is the rule of income taxation with respect to Mr. Sebastian’s income in 1997 as a
seaman on board the Norwegian vessel engaged in international shipping? Explain your
answer. (2002 Bar)

72. Mr. Santos died intestate in 1989, leaving his spouse and five children as the
only heirs. The estate consisted of a family home and a four-door apartment,
which was being rented to tenants. Within the year, an extrajudicial settlement of
the estate was executed among the heirs, each of them receiving his/her due share.
The surviving spouse assumed administration of the property. Each year the net
income from the rental of the property was distributed to all, proportionately, on
which they paid, respectively the corresponding income tax. In 1994, the income
tax returns of the heirs were examined and deficiency income tax assessments
were issued against each of them for the years 1989 to 1993 as having entered
into unregistered partnership. Were the assessments justified? (1997 Bar)

73. Distinguish Allowable Deduction from Personal Exemptions. Give example of

an allowable deduction and another example for personal exemption. (2001 Bar)

74. OXY is the president and chief executive officer of ADD Computers, Inc.
When OXY was asked to join the government service as director of the bureau
under the Department of Trade and Industry, he took a leave of absence from
17
 ADD. Believing that its business outlook, goodwill and opportunities improved
with OXY in the government, ADD proposed to obtain a policy of insurance on
his life. On ethical grounds, OXY objected to the insurance purchase but ADD
purchased the policy anyway. Its annual premium amounted to P100,000.00. Is
said premium deductible by ADD Computers, Inc.? Reason. (2004 Bar)

75. X is the manager of Mang Douglas Hamburger Inc. X had dinner with Y, owner of a
chain of restaurants to convince the latter to carry Mang Douglas hamburgers. After Y
agreed, both went their separate ways. X celebrated by going to a single’s bar. He
picked up a partner and consumed a bottle of beer. He drove home at 3:00 a.m. On his
way home, he sideswiped a pedestrian, who died as a result of the accident. X amicably
settled the case by paying the heirs of the pedestrian. The money, however, came from
Mang Douglas Hamburger, Inc.

Discuss whether the reward, given to the heir can be claimed by Mang Douglas
hamburger, Inc. as an expense deductible in its Income Tax Return. (1993 Bar)

76. PQR Corp. claimed as a deduction in its tax returns the amount of P1,000,000 as bad
debts. The corporation was assessed by the Commissioner of Internal Revenue for
deficiency taxes on the ground that the debts cannot be considered as “worthless,” hence
they do not qualify as bad debts. The company asks for your advice on “What factors
will help in determining whether or not the debts are bad debts?” Answer and explain
briefly. (2004 Bar)

77. Kronge Konsult, Inc. (KKI) is a Philippine corporation engaged in

architectural design, engineering, and construction work. Its principal office is
located in Makati City, but it has various infrastructure projects in the country
and abroad. Thus, KKI employs both local and foreign workers. The company
has adopted a policy that the employees'salaries are paid in the currency of the
country where they are assigned or detailed.

Below are some of the employees of KKI. Determine whether the

compensation they received from KKI in 2017 is taxable under Philippine
laws and whether they are required to file tax returns with the Bureau of
Internal Revenue (BIR).
(a) Kris Konejero, a Filipino accountant in KKl'sTax Department
in the Makati office, and married to a Filipino engineer also
working in KKI;
(b) Klaus Kloner, a German national who heads KKl'sDesign
Department in its Makati office;
(c) Krisanto Konde, a Filipino engineer in KKl'sDesign
Department who was hired to work at the principal office last
January 2017. In April 2017, he was assigned and detailed in
the company's project in Jakarta, Indonesia, which project is
expected to be completed in April 2019;
(d) Kamilo Konde, Krisanto'sbrother, also an engineer assigned to
KKl'sA project in Taipei, Taiwan. Since KKI provides for
housing and other basic needs, Kamila requested that all his
salaries, paid in Taiwanese dollars, be paid to his wife in
Manila in its Philippine Peso equivalent; and
(e) Karen Karenina, a Filipino architect in KKl'sDesign
Department who reported back to KKl'sMakati office in June

18
 2017 after KKl'sproject in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia was
completed. (2018 Bar)

78. Kim, a Filipino national, worked with K-Square, Inc. (KSI), and
was seconded to various KSl-affiliated corporations:
1. from 1999 to 2004 as Vice President of K-Gold Inc.,
2. from 2004 to 2007 as Vice President of KPB Bank;
3. from 2007 to 2011 as CEO of K-Com Inc.;
4. from 2011 to 2017 as CEO of K-Water Corporation,
where Kim served as CEO for seven years until his
retirement last December 12, 2017 upon reaching the
compulsory retirement age of 60 years.

All the corporations mentioned are majority-owned in common by

the Koh family and covered by a BIR-qualified multiemployer-employee
retirement plan (MEE RP), under which the employees may be moved
around within the controlled group (i.e., from one KSI subsidiary or affiliate
to another) without loss of seniority rights or break in the tenure. Kim was
well-loved by his employer and colleagues, so upon retirement, and on his
last day in office, KSI gave him a Mercedes Benz car worth PhP 5 million
as a surprise, with a streamer that reads: "You'llbe missed. Good luck, Sir
Kim."
(a) Are the retirement benefits paid to Kim pursuant to the
MEERP taxable?
(b) Which internal revenue tax, if any, will apply to the grant of
the car to Kim by the company? (2018 Bar)

79. Years ago, Krisanto bought a parcel of land in Muntinlupa for

only PhP65,000. He donated the land to his son, Kornelio, in 1980 when the
property had a fair market value of PhP75,000, and paid the corresponding
donor'stax.
Kornelio, in turn, sold the property in 2000 to Katrina for PhP 6.5
million and paid the capital gains tax, documentary stamp tax, local transfer
tax, and other fees and charges. Katrina, in turn, donated the land to
Klaret School last August 30, 2017 to be used as the site for additional
classrooms. No donor's tax was paid/ because Katrina claimed that the
donation was exempt from taxation. At the time of the donation to Klaret
School, the land had a fair market value of PhP 65 million.
(a) Is Katrina liable for donor'stax?
(b) How much in deduction from gross income may Katrina
claim on account of the said donation? (2018 Bar)

80. Spouses Konstantine and Karina are Filipino citizens and are
principal shareholders of a restaurant chain, Karina's,Inc. The
restaurant'sprincipal office is in Makati City, Philippines.
Karina'sbecame so popular as a Filipino restaurant that the owners
decided to expand its operations overseas. During the period 2010-2015
alone, it opened ten (10) stores throughout North America and five (5) stores
in various parts of Europe where there were large Filipino communities.
19
Each store abroad was in the name of a corporation organized underofthe
laws the state or country in which the store was located. All stores had
identical capital structures: 60% of the outstanding capital stock was owned
by Karina's,Inc., while the remaining 40% was owned directly by the
spouses Konstantine and Karina.
Beginning 2017, in light of the immigration policy enunciated by US
President Donald Trump, many Filipinos have since returned to the
Philippines and the number of Filipino immigrants in the US dropped
significantly. On account of these developments, Konstantine and Karina
decided to sell their shares of stock in the five (5) US corporations that were
doing poorly in gross sales. The spouses' lawyer-friend advised them that
they will be taxed 5% on the first PhP100,000 net capital gain, and 10% on
the net capital gain in excess of PhP100,000.
Is the lawyer correct? If not, how should the spouses Konstantine and
Karina be taxed on the sale of their shares? (2018 Bar)

81. Kria, Inc., a Korean corporation engaged in the business of

manufacturing electric vehicles, established a branch office in the Philippines in
2010. The Philippine branch constructed a manufacturing plant in Kabuyao,
Laguna, and the construction lasted three (3) years. Commercial operations in the
Laguna plant began in 2014.
In just two (2) years of operation, the Philippine branch had remittable
profits in an amount exceeding 175% of its capital. However, the head office in
Korea instructed the branch not to remit the profits to the Korean head office until
instructed otherwise. The branch chief finance officer is concerned that the BIR
might hold the Philippine branch liable for the 10% improperly accumulated
earnings tax (IAET) for permitting its profits to accumulate beyond
reasonable business needs.
(a) Is the Philippine branch of Kria subject to the 10%
IAET under the circumstances stated above?
(b) Is it subject to 15% branch profit remittance tax (BPRT)?
(2018 Bar)

82. Klaus, Inc., a domestic, VAT-registered corporation engaged in the

land transportation business, owns a house and lot along Katipunan St., Quezon
City. This property is being used by Klaus, lnc.'s president and single largest
shareholder, Atty. Krimson, as his residence. No business activity transpires
there except for the company'sChristmas party which is held there every
December. Atty. Krimson recently grew tired of the long commute from
Katipunan to his office in Makati City and caused the company to sell the house
and lot. The sale was recorded in the books of Klaus, Inc. as investment in real
property.
(a) Is the sale of the said property subject to VAT?
(b) Is the sale subject to 6% capital gains tax or regular
corporate income tax of 30%? (2018 Bar)

83. Koko'sprimary source of income is his employment with the

20
government. He earns extra from the land he inherited from his parents,
and which land he has been leasing to a private, non-stock, non-profit
school since 2005.
Last January, the school offered to buy the land from Koko for an
amount equivalent to its zonal value plus 15% of such zonal value. Koko
agreed but required the school to pay, in addition to the purchase price, the
12% VAT. The school refused Koko'sproposal to pass on the VAT
contending that it was an entity exempt from such tax. Moreover, it said
that Koko was not regularly engaged in the real estate business and,
therefore, was not subject to VAT. Consequently, Koko should not charge
any VAT to the school.
(a) Is the contention of the school correct?
(b) Will your answer be the same if Koko signed up as a VAT-
registered person only in 2017? (2018 Bar)

84. Kilusang Krus, Inc. (KKI) is a non-stock, non-profit religious

organization which owns a vast tract of land in Kalinga.
KKI has devoted 1/2 of the land for various uses: a church with a
cemetery exclusive for deceased priests and nuns, a school providing K
to 12 education, and a hospital which admits both paying and charity
patients. The remaining 1/2 portion has remained idle.
The KKI Board of Trustees decided to lease the remaining 1/2
portion to a real estate developer which constructed a community mall
over the property.
Since the rental income from the lease of the property was
substantial, the KKI decided to use the amount to finance ( 1) the medical
expenses of the charity patients in the KKI Hospital and (2) the purchase
of books and other educational materials for the students of KKI School.
(a) Is KKI liable for real property taxes on the land?
(b) Is KKl'sincome from the rental fees subject to income tax?
(2018 Bar)

21
  

22
23