Workforce Diversity & Performance
Workforce Diversity & Performance
SCHOOL OF COMMERCE
JUNE 2017
                                 I
                                Addis Ababa University
                        College of Business and Economics
                                 School of Commerce
APPROVALS
The undersigned certify that they have read and hereby recommend to Addis Ababa University
to accept the Thesis submitted by Saron Eshetu, and entitled “The Effect of Work Force Diversity
on Employee performance (The Case of Addis Credit and Saving Institution S.C)’ ” in partial
fulfillment of the requirements for the award of the Degree of Masters in Human Resource
Management.
Date _____________
Date ______________
Date ______________
                                               II
                                    Letter of Certification
This to certify that Saron Eshetu has carried out her thesis work on the topic entitled “The Effect
of Work Force Diversity on Employee performance (The Case of Addis Credit and Saving Institution
S.C)” under my guidance and supervision. Accordingly, I here assure that her work is appropriate
and standard enough to be submitted for the award of Master of Arts in Human Resource
Management.
                                                III
                                        DECLARATIONS
Here with I, Saron Eshetu, declare that this thesis is prepared for the partial fulfillment of the
requirements for the Master of Arts in Human Resource Management ‘A Study on Effects of
Workforce Diversity on Employee Performance (The Case of Addis Credit and Saving
Institution S.C)’. This thesis is my original work and has not been presented for a degree in any
university, and that all sources of material used for the thesis have been duly acknowledged. I have
made it independently with the close advice and guidance of my advisor.
___________________________
                                                 IV
                                                                     Contents
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT ......................................................................................................... VIII
List of Tables ................................................................................................................................ IX
List of Figures ................................................................................................................................ X
List of Abbreviation ...................................................................................................................... XI
Abstract ........................................................................................................................................ XII
CHAPTER ONE ........................................................................................................................... 1
1. INTRODUCTION..................................................................................................................... 1
   1.1 Background of the Study ..................................................................................................................... 1
   1.2 Statement of the Problem .................................................................................................................. 3
   1.3 Research Questions: ........................................................................................................................... 5
   1.4 Objectives of the study ....................................................................................................................... 6
      1.4.1 General Objective ........................................................................................................................ 6
      1.4.2 The specific objectives of the study ............................................................................................ 6
   1.5 Significance of the study ..................................................................................................................... 6
   1.6 Limitation of the Study........................................................................................................................ 7
   1.7 Organization of the paper ................................................................................................................... 7
CHAPTER TWO .......................................................................................................................... 8
2. Review of Related Literature ................................................................................................... 8
   2.1 Different Views of Diversity ................................................................................................................ 8
   2.2 Managing Diversity ........................................................................................................................... 10
   2.3 Workplace Diversity .......................................................................................................................... 10
   2.4 Theoretical Consideration ................................................................................................................. 11
   2.5 Benefits of Managing Workforce Diversity ....................................................................................... 12
      2.5.1 Six Diversity Perspectives that Benefit a Diverse Workforce:.................................................... 12
   2.6 Challenges of Workforce Diversity.................................................................................................... 14
   2.7 Performance ..................................................................................................................................... 16
      2.7.1 Steps on the Improvement of Effectiveness of Performance Appraisal Practices in the Area of
      Diversity .............................................................................................................................................. 16
   2.8 Relationship between Performance and Workforce Diversity ......................................................... 17
   2.9 Diversity and Demographic Variables ............................................................................................... 17
                                                                              V
      2.9.1 Employee Performance.............................................................................................................. 17
      2.9.2 Ethnicity and work performance ............................................................................................... 18
      2.9.3 Gender and Work Performance ................................................................................................. 19
      2.9.4 Education Background and Work Performance......................................................................... 21
   2.10 Empirical Review of Literature ........................................................................................................ 22
      2.10.1 Effects of ethnicity on employee performance ....................................................................... 22
      2.10.2 Effects of Gender on employee performance ......................................................................... 24
      2.10.3 Effects of Educational Background on Employee Performance .............................................. 27
   2.11 Conceptual Frame work and Hypotheses ....................................................................................... 28
      2.11.1 Conceptual Frame .................................................................................................................... 28
      2.11.2 Hypothesis................................................................................................................................ 28
CHAPTER THREE .................................................................................................................... 30
3. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY .......................................................................................... 30
3.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 30
   3.2 Research Design ................................................................................................................................ 30
   3.3 Target Population.............................................................................................................................. 30
   3.4 Sample Size Determination ............................................................................................................... 31
   3.5 Sampling Technique .......................................................................................................................... 32
   3.6 Procedure for Data Gathering........................................................................................................... 33
   3.7 Reliability Test ................................................................................................................................... 33
      3.7.1 Biographical Data Sheet (Section A) .......................................................................................... 33
      3.7.2 Work Force Diversity Survey ...................................................................................................... 34
      3.7.3 Origins of Construct ................................................................................................................... 34
      3.7.4 Pilot Test .................................................................................................................................... 34
   3.8 Validity Test....................................................................................................................................... 35
   3. 9 Data Processing ................................................................................................................................ 35
   3.10 Methods of Data Analysis ............................................................................................................... 36
      3.10.1. Descriptive Analysis ................................................................................................................ 36
      3.10.2. Inferential Analysis .................................................................................................................. 36
   3.11 Ethical Considerations..................................................................................................................... 39
CHAPTER FOUR ....................................................................................................................... 40
4.RESULTS AND DISCUSSION .............................................................................................. 40
   4.1. Response Rate.................................................................................................................................. 40
                                                                             VI
   4.2 Descriptive Analysis .......................................................................................................................... 41
      4.2.1 Demographic Characteristics of Respondents ........................................................................... 41
      4.2.2 Measurement of Central Tendencies (MCT) for Constructs ...................................................... 46
   4.3 Inferential Analysis ............................................................................................................................ 55
      4.3.1 Correlation Analysis ................................................................................................................... 55
      4.3.2 Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) .................................................................................................... 56
      4.3.3 Multiple Linear Regression Analysis........................................................................................... 57
   4.4 Hypothesis testing and discussion of results .................................................................................... 59
CHAPTER FIVE .................................................................................................................................... 60
5. SUMMARY, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ......................................... 63
   5.1 Introduction ...................................................................................................................................... 63
   5.2 summary of descriptive analysis ...................................................................................................... 63
   5.3 Recommendations for Future study ................................................................................................ 66
   5.4. Conclusion ........................................................................................................................................ 66
References ..................................................................................................................................... 67
APPENDICES .............................................................................................................................. 76
                                                                            VII
                                   ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
All thanks and praise is due to the almighty God the most Beneficent, the most Merciful for giving
me the health, strength and determination to complete this thesis. It is He that I give thanks to,
above all.
I would like to extend my gratitude and sincere appreciation to the following people that has
supported, assisted and facilitated the completions of this research:
To my advisor, Dr WoldeEmmanuel Walombo for the assistance with the completion of my thesis.
Your astute insight and guidance throughout the writing and completion of this thesis was
inspiring, invaluable and encouraging.
To my beloved Mother W/ro Genet Mengesha for allowing me to grow in my own shoes and your
continuous love and guidance.
To my beautiful, inspirational and supportive husband and children, Ato Mehateme, Dawit, Hana
and for my youngest child Robel I love you all and you are the center of my heart. Your patience
and understanding throughout my studies has not gone unnoticed. Your positivity and words of
encouragement inspired and kept me going.
I am also grateful to Addis Credit and Saving Institution for allowing me to conduct this study.
My special appreciation goes to member of the institution Ato Abey Kasahun at head office and
W/ro. Mesert Assefa Kirkose district assisted me in data collection and sampling procedure.
                                                VIII
                                                        List of Tables
Table 3.1. Population frame work................................................................................................31
                                                                    IX
                                                    List of Figures
Figure 2.1 How race influences the self-perceived communication model..................................23
                                                                X
                        List of Abbreviation
                                    XI
                                               Abstract
Workforce diversity is a multi-faceted phenomenon that will continue to evolve as the world becomes a
global marketplace. No doubt many believe workforce diversity is fundamental for employee
performance. This study sought to find out the effect of workforce diversity on employee work
performance, using the Addis Credit and Saving institution S.C. In the context of this study the term
workforce diversity was defined as the similarities and differences among employees in terms of ethnic
background, gender and education. These similarities and differences formed the independent variables
of this study. Literature review was done and an attempt was made to link the various published studies
with this study with a view to discovering how each variable effect on employee work performance at the
ADCSI. The most unfortunate is that there are no WFD related studies done in Ethiopian context to the
knowledge of the researcher. So the purpose of this study was twofold. The primary goal was to fill the
research gap on the area in Ethiopian context by examining work force diversity practices of case study
affiliate company and its effect on employee performance.
To achieve the objective of the thesis, the research method used was explanatory survey design study.
Through the use of primary and secondary data sources, the researcher has gathered the necessary
information regarding WFD practices of the case study company ADCSI and its effect on employee’s
performance besides intensive literature review to identify gapes and different scholars point of view on
WFD and demographic diversity model. A survey was administrated to a sample of current employees of
the financial institution. The data collected from primary sources were analyzed quantitatively (using
descriptive inferential method of analysis).
The summarized responses were used to examine the effect of each variable on employee work
performance. Correlation Coefficient analysis showed a significant level of association between
performance and the tested variables of diversity. It became evident that workforce diversity has
significant correlation between gender and employee performance The finding of this study showed
gender, ethnic and employee performance is positively linked and education diversity has no significant
effect on work performance of the employee. This study could be a guideline for future studies. It is
therefore important for the institution to realize the need to capitalize on these demographic categories
in order to stay ahead of other company or organization.
Key Words: Diversity, Diversity Management, Gender Diversity, Ethnicity Diversity, Education
Diversity, Workforce Diversity
                                                   XII
                                       CHAPTER ONE
                                     1. INTRODUCTION
Advances in technology and the advent of a global economy bring the people of the world closer
together than ever before. Given this fact, businesses, educational systems and other entities are
investigating ways to better serve their constituents. Child (2005).
To achieve success and maintain a competitive advantage, company must be able to draw on the
most important resource such as the skills of the workforce. With the increasing richness of
diversity in the workforce. Srivastava (2012).
Company’s need to expand their outlook and use creative strategies to be successful by using
Employees knowledge and skill as a primary resource. Workforce diversity refers to organizations
that are becoming more heterogeneous with the mix of people in terms of gender, age, race, and
education background. Robbins (2009). A diverse workforce for instance, includes gender, age,
ethnicity, and education background. According to Robbins (2009), workforce diversity has
important implications toward management practices and policies. Frequently, diversity is
viewed in a limited fashion, primarily addressing issues of race or gender differences, and linked
to the laws providing protected status to certain groups. Scholars have used a very broad
definition of diversity, to encompass most characteristics that individuals possess that affect the
way they think and do things. Algahtani, (2013)
Today’s managers are responsible for both leading employees and responding to the needs of
customers who are more ethnically and culturally diverse, older, and in greater need of child and
elder care. Leaders in both the public and the private sectors are focusing more attention on the
issue of diversity. Whether the goal is to be an employer of choice, to provide excellent customer
service, or to maintain a competitive edge, diversity is increasingly recognized and utilized as an
important organizational resource. Sungjoo, (2010).
                                                 1
Leaders and managers within organizations are primarily responsible for the success of diversity
policies because they must ensure that the policies are effective. Instead of treating every
employee alike to recognizing and responding to those differences, it is a way to ensure employee
retention and greater productivity. Roberson et, al. (2007), the most important issues of
workforce diversity are to address the problems of discrimination in terms of gender, age,
ethnicity and education background. When diversity is not managed properly, there will be a
potential for higher turnover, difficult in communication and interpersonal conflicts. Overall, it
will be confrontational to organization’s performance, profitability and reputation.
This research proposes to adopt the narrow definition of diversity so as to use the demographic
categorization to investigate the effect of workforce diversity on employee performance at
ADCSI. Three dimensions of workforce diversity namely ethnicity, gender and education shall
therefore form the independent variables. The dependent variable shall be the work
performance.
It distinguishes the factors that can affect the employee’s performance mainly focuses the
financial institution. This research would also act as a guideline for the potential new entrants
who wish to enter the industry on issues that need to be considered before starting business.
From the researcher’s analysis, microfinance institution is a small businesses financial aid
company which operates within the boundaries of Addis Ababa city Administration. It was
established and registered at the National bank of Ethiopia and owned by six shareholders,
namely, Addis Ababa city Administration, A.A. City Women, youth & Teachers associations’
Karalo Akababi peasant’s cooperative & one physical person. As a company, Addis Credit and
saving institution (ADCSI) draws its workforce from diverse backgrounds. Therefore, it faces
pertinent issues such as demographic changes, increasing number of women joining its
workforce, company restructuring, and the implementation of the equal opportunity legislation,
which requires the institution review their management practices and develop new and creative
approaches to people management. All these issues play out on the employee and can affect his
or her work performance.
                                                2
This research sought to investigate the effect of workforce diversity on employee work performance
in the ADCSI, (demographic categorization). The ADCSI has a total workforce of over 1,000 employees.
The study focused on the employees in head office and kirkos district of ADCSI whose number 93.
Lastly, recommendations were provided concerning the effect of workforce diversity towards
employee’s performance in Addis Credit and saving institution.
Workforce diversity trends were first identified in the mid-1980s and they were proclaimed as an
opportunity for organizations to become more creative, to reach previously untapped markets
and talents, and in general to achieve and maintain a competitive advantage Roberson (2007).
Erasmus (2007) contended that, diversity management and workforce diversity are a forced
integration that creates conflict and uncertainty in the workforce as leadership is not skilled in
the discipline of diversity management and its principles. As a result, managers do not know how
to effectively practice diversity management, and what factors contribute to effective diversity
management and task that can deal with diversity related issues in the work place.
Even though companies train employees upon hire, conduct ethics test, online training and
targeted anti-harassment training, employees still make decisions to break the rules with their
behavior when it comes to diversity. (Victoria and Mary 2010).
According to Dahm (2003), diversity within the workplace can evoke an array of emotions as,
some view diversity as something to be dealt rather than a tool to be used to improve the
organization. Even though, many will agree that the results of a diversity-conscious organization
add value to the employee and organization, yet research evaluating diversity for the sake of
developing training interventions does not exist. Dahm (2003).           Hilary and Elaine (2000)
suggested that organizations should embrace diversity in their workforce and work towards
achieving it by creating a culture where difference can thrive, rather than working simply for
representatives and assimilation.
                                                 3
For instance, CIMB group's chief executive officer Datuk Nazir Razak reported in The Star Online
that Malaysia needs to build on its diversity and its strength and review the affirmative action
policy created under the New Economic Policy. However, according to an article in The Star
online, most of the Malaysian companies are not doing enough in retaining women professionals
by creating conducive working environment. Based on a report from a Ranstad (2010) World of
Work, many women in their 30‟s were choosing to leave their workplace to find balance between
work life and their home life. Lee, (2011).
Most attention on diversity management focused on the organizational decision maker who is
biased against certain groups and who allows these biases to influence how he or she treats
employee. Moreover, they become embodied in organizational policies and practices that
systematically disadvantage some employees Loriann and Carol. (2007).
As an extension, employee diversity does not necessarily boost creativity, market share, or
competitive advantage. In fact, research suggests that left un-managed, employee diversity is
more likely to damage morale, increase turnover, and cause significant communication problems
and conflict within the organization Loriann et, al., (2007).
The study by Eugene et al. (2011), at the Malaysia Airlines showed that there is significant
relationship between ethnicity group and employee performance. They observed that teams of
employees who were ethnically diverse performed poorly compared to the homogeneous teams.
According to their results, in ethnically homogeneous organizations, the ethnic differences
among members of diverse teams becomes more salient and are more likely to interfere with
performance. They further observed that in heterogeneous organizations, the ethnic identities
of team members may be less salient and therefore they create less disruption.
Another study done by Elsaid et al. (2012), in the Egyptian Pharmaceutical Industry indicated that
educational background was significant in explaining employee performance when employees
with different educational levels or background worked together. Those with higher education
tended to perform better. Similar outcome with Munjuri et, al. (2012) study’s, the Banking Sector
                                                 4
in Kenya with respect to the effects of educational background and employee performance
showed that employees with higher education performed better.
According to Kochan, et.al (2003), people began to realize that visible, legally recognized,
demographic differences such as race and gender were not only types of differences that affected
work relationships among employees. Furthermore, most studies show that training programs
on workforce diversity management, that presumed to enhance decision making, problem
solving, and creativity at work; rarely leads to the desired long-term changes in attitudes and
behavior.
Decades of research on the effects of diversity within teams and small groups indicate that
diversity can have negative effects, as well as positives ones Kochan et al. (2003). Moreover, they
elaborated that the lack of evidence linking workforce diversity to employee performance may
be that the relationship between diversity and the bottom line is more complex than is implied
by the popular discussion. Therefore, this study focuses on the relationship among gender,
ethnicity, and education background towards employee’s performance in ADCSI.
Thus, this study aims to fill the perceived gaps in empirical studies on the area of Ethiopian
context on effect of workforce diversity on employee performance area focuses on the
researched company and propose a definition of diversity and model of DM that can be
applicable to related context.
                                                5
1.4 Objectives of the study
1.4.1 General Objective
The purpose of this study is to examine the effect of workforce diversity towards employee
performance.
Workforce diversity is very much interrelated with HR Management in any sector to fascinate
and recruit the best people from a group of diverse workforce.
Motivated by this view, the researcher target is to fill the gap on workforce diversity practices in
Ethiopia with a particular reference to the case study company as well as to contribute to the
enrichment of the body of knowledge on workforce diversity effect on employee performance.
It is therefore, predicted that the results of the study would go a long way to enlighten scholars
and lay readers on the effects of workforce diversity upon employee work performance at Addis
Credit and saving institution. The parties that will benefit immensely from this study included,
the Human Resource Manager at the microfinance institution, who could use the findings of this
study to review the policies on employment and the top management at microfinance institution
who would use the findings of this study in policy formulation on diversity and related issues.
Other microfinance institutions in Ethiopia, as well as other organizations, both private and
public, that required employee services for their sustainability, would benefit from this study it
also serves as literature who has a desire to know about demographic diversity. Finally, future
researchers and scholars, in this field of study, would benefit too from the findings of this study
                                                   6
1.6 Limitation of the Study
There are some limitations that were identified during the progress of completing this research
study. A major problem that can never be eliminated during the process of generating
information is respondent’s resistance. Lack of willingness to participate in the survey because of
answering the questionnaires was time consuming and perceived as it did not bring any benefits
to them. Therefore, the unresponsive and inactive behavior of the respondents may affect the
study.
A mixed methods approach could have been employed combining qualitative information with
quantitative outcomes. With qualitative information, greater clarity could have been provided
through penetrating questions. Unfortunately, by their nature, forced-choice format
questionnaires prevent researchers from gaining valuable information to reinforce their findings.
The current research could have included more biographical data in the questionnaire such as
income levels and disability’s in order to gain more information of the participants.
All these factors may affect the reliability of the study and generalizability of the findings.
In chapter one, the researchers present the overview of the study context and explain the
research problem. This chapter addresses the research objective to be achieved, the research
question to be answered and briefly explain about the importance or contribution of the
research. Chapter two focuses on the literature review of the theoretical argument from
secondary sources such as journal, articles and etc. The empirical studies that were done in this
chapter to enable the researchers to construct the hypotheses and conceptual framework of the
research. Chapter three is conducted to describe how the research is carried out in terms of
research design, population, sample and sampling procedures, data collection methods,
operationalization and the methods of data analysis.
The results of the analysis presented in chapter four, finally, chapter five concludes with overall
findings and provides the recommendations of the present research.
                                                  7
                                         Chapter two
                              2. Review of Related Literature
In support of this notion Erasmus (2007) indicates that individuals have primary characteristics
which are inborn attributes, which contribute to the manner in which individuals perceive the
environment and serve as a lens through which individuals interpret the world. Primary
differences are factors such as age, ethnicity, gender and race. The above author also stated that
individuals also have secondary characteristics which evolve or change over time and through life
experiences. Secondary attributes relate to factors such as level of skill, education and religion.
While there is no consensus on the concept of diversity, the basic definition includes
demographic differences which include observable social or group identities. However, diversity
is complex concept has been conceptualized from several viewpoints. There are three categories
of views: broad, narrow and balanced view. Erasmus (2007).
According to Janssens, Sels & van den Brande (2003), workplace diversity is a complex,
controversial, and political phenomena. It has been conceptualized by researchers from several
viewpoints. Nkomo (1995) stated that several researchers have looked at workforce diversity
from a very narrow perspective while some from a broad view. According to Cross, Katz et al,
(1994), scholars favorably disposed to a narrow definition argue that the concept of diversity
should be restricted to specific cultural categories such as race and gender.
                                                  8
Nkomo (1995) lectured that diversity based on race, ethnicity and gender cannot be understood
in the same way as diversity based on organizational functions, abilities or cognitive orientations.
In harmony with Michaéla et al. (2003), argued that since a cultural diversity dimension interacts
with other dimensions of diversity, a narrow concept of diversity would be deficient since it will
fail to recognize those interactions.
According to Jackson, et al, (2003), advocates of a broad definition of diversity, argued that,
diversity encompasses all the possible ways people can differ. According to this school of thought,
individuals do not only differ because of their race, gender, age and other demographic
categories but also because of their values, abilities, organizational function, tenure and
personality. They contended that an individual has multiple identities and that the manifold
dimensions cannot be isolated in an organizational setting.
The advocates of the broad definition of diversity further argued that, apart from bringing their
race, age, ethnicity, and gender, individuals also come with their particular knowledge gained
from their educational background, personality and cognitive style to the work place. They
pointed out that in order to understand the dynamics of a heterogeneous workforce, interactive
effects of multi-dimensional diversity have to be addressed.
According to Herring and Henderson (2011), has broadened the concept of diversity to include
all differences that people bring to work, which makes its management more difficult. Wheeler
(2003) defines diversity as “all the ways in which we differ…”. For them diversity includes all types
if individual or human differences include a range of personal, demographic and organizational
difference. McGrath, et al, (1995) conceptualized workforce diversity by way of developing a five
cluster classification. This categorization is widely used and is as follows: demographic
characteristic (age, ethnicity, gender, sex, physical status, religion and education), task related
knowledge, skills and capacities (values, views and attitudes), personal, cognitive and attitudinal
styles (status in the organization such as one`s hierarchical position, professional domain,
departmental affiliation and seniority)
                                                 9
2.2 Managing Diversity
Diversity initiatives typically involve employee recruitment and promotion strategies targeting
underrepresented groups and mechanisms to both tap the latent perspectives within
organizations and, ultimately, bring them to bear on organizational policy decisions (Herdman &
McMillan-Capehart, (2010).
According to Stockdale and Crosby (2004) ‘workplace diversity presents as differences that affect
people with regard to acceptance, work performance, satisfaction, career or job related progress
in an organization’. According to Robbins (2001) workplace diversity is the challenge
organizations have in exerting an effort to adapt to the dynamics of employees which are
different. Workplace diversity is about inclusion, which is a challenge that encompasses everyone
to work together for the optimal function of the organization. What is becoming increasingly
evident is that workplace diversity is an increasing reality and organizations need to be able to
manage this phenomenon successfully, as this diversity is also becoming increasingly complex
Kamps & Engelbrecht, (2011).
Workplace diversity directly and indirectly affects and has influences on in-group and outgroup
behavior (the effects of individuals belonging to certain subgroups, such as gender, age, or
race, and thus being outside of other subgroups), stereotype and status expectancies, and
individual differences in cognition, values, and behavior.
In turn, these three intermediary variables affect interpersonal and role relations and task
performance Brown, Knoese & Stewart, (2009). Irrespective of the amount of information on
                                                10
how to manage diversity, relatively little attention has been paid to the measures of workplace
diversity Hostager & De Meuse, (2002). The dimensions of workplace diversity alter and influence
organizational work and functionality. Workplace diversity plays many roles within an
organization, on an interpersonal, intrapersonal and structural participation level. The
dimensions of workplace diversity play a pivotal role in the organization which influences
organizational policies which creates and contribute to stifling differences among employees.
Workplace diversity often affects employee job satisfaction based on factors of equity related to
performance appraisals, which affect salary fluctuations and career mobility.
Diversity initiatives relate to finding the balance between the individual needs of employees and
the organizational needs, while at the same time managing the conflicts and uncertainty resulting
from diversity Uys, (2003) and Brooks (2007) argued and presents a few guidelines below that
are required to enhance diversity management with which to effectively manage workforces:
1. “Ensure management accountability.” Managers who are responsible for hiring and training
staff need to be held accountable for their success or failure at creating a diverse staff. In the
corporate world promotions and pay raises should depend on a manager’s proven success at
managing a diverse staff.
                                               11
3. “Pay attention to the numbers.” Those responsible for recruiting and managing staff need to
constantly monitor the diversity statistics of their staffs, and also be managed around those
statistics by CEOs.
4. “Provide training.” Training is essential for staff to understand the importance of diversity
goals and to learn how to successfully manage and work with a diverse staff.
5. “Develop mentoring programs.” Mentoring relationships are crucial to retaining a diverse staff
and communicating organizational expectations concerning promotions and advancement.
A diverse collection of skills and experiences such as languages, cultural understanding may allow
a company to provide service to customers on a global basis. A diverse workforce that feels
comfortable communicating varying points of view provides a larger pool of ideas and
experiences from which an organization can draw from that pool to meet business strategy needs
and the needs of customers more effectively. Companies that encourage workplace diversity
inspire all of their employees to perform to their highest ability. Companywide strategies can
then be executed; resulting in higher productivity, profit, and return on investment. De Meuse,
(2002)
Based on a review of the literature, Cox and Blake (1991) proposed the following business
benefits allowing a cost advantage within a diversity.
    Cost Argument
The cost argument of diversity indicates that through diversity management organizations can
develop a cost advantage. According to Cox and Blake (1991) diversity management works
                                               12
toward the development and improvement of organizational performance permitting higher
levels of efficiency and the maintenance of competitive advantage within the industry.
Diversity in an organization means being different in a workplace can allow the individual to feel
excluded.
The cost argument indicates that failure to maintain and initiate diversity efforts among
employees, specifically minority groups such as women, can have immense cost effects on
the organization. Costs such as decreased profitability, increases in labor turnover and higher
levels of absenteeism. There is a rising cost of integrating workers poorly, as demographic
diversity increases Cox & Blake (1991).
    Resource Acquisition
The resource acquisition argument indicates that by fully utilizing and intervening with diverse
employees in diversity initiatives. it benefits the organization resulting in competitive advantage.
The managing resources argument in diversity means using employees to reach goals.
Organizations that make an intent on including minority group women and integrating groups
that feel diversity does not benefit them personally are proactively managing the interest of the
organization for future success. Focusing on including minority groups and retaining previous
staff decreases labor turnover and increases productivity, decreases losses and increases gains
means that equilibrium in terms of diversity can be achieved. Leveraging diverse resources means
that an organizations market competencies and meeting the needs of diverse consumers by
understanding diverse needs which adds value to the company in the market place among
consumers. Adopting a diversity management approach will develop reputations of favorability
for the organization as prospective employers for women and ethnic minorities and companies
get the best personnel. As the labour pool shrinks and changes composition, increasing minority
groups will become increasingly important. Cox & Blake (1991).
    System Flexibility
System flexibility relates to managing and leading employees into work challenges and
experiences that are best suited to individual needs. By clustering together, diverse individuals
are able to express different points of view about a topic of discussion meaning that projects and
                                                13
workplace initiatives have more flexible solutions and leave clients with an array of options from
which to choose. System flexibility is about how flexible the system of work can be managed so
as to provide clients with improved work-output from the organization improving market share
and meeting the needs of clients at an optimal level. The system becomes less standardized, and
therefore more fluid, which creates more flexibility to react to environmental changes. The
increased fluidity should create greater flexibility to react to environmental changes (i.e.,
reactions should be faster and at less cost). Cox & Blake (1991).
    Marketing Argument
Overseas companies will obtain insight and cultural sensitivity from having members with roots
of other countries and different nationalities thus improving market capabilities and marketing
strategies. There is the potential for marketing gains from improved insight and cultural
sensitivity, from having members with roots in other countries. Consumers are becoming more
diverse and the firm needs to reflect this, or it will lose out on important markets. For multi-
national organizations, the insight and cultural sensitivity that members with roots in other
countries bring to the marketing effort should improve these efforts in important ways. The same
rationale applies to marketing to subpopulations within domestic operations. Cox & Blake (1991).
    Creativity Argument
Creativity argument indicates the presence of diversity of perspectives and less emphasis on
conformity to past norms should improve creativity. There are savings from a reduction in
employment tribunals and other workplace costs when organizations and workers comply with
equality legislation. Cox & Blake, (1991).
    Problem–Solving Argument
Heterogeneity in groups potentially produces better decisions and problem solving through a
wider range of perspectives and more thorough critical analysis of issues Cox & Blake, (1991).
According to Greenberg (2004) the major challenges are communication, resistance to change,
and implementation of diversity in the workplace. D’Netto and Sohal (1999) cite challenges from
workforce diversity as meeting diversity challenges requires a strategic human resource plan that
                                                14
includes a number of different strategies to enhance diversity and promote the productivity and
effectiveness. It also compels human resource managers to solicit a trainable population, check
required skills and competencies against the job, market jobs sufficiently ahead of needs, and
extend the workforce boundaries to include the nationals of other countries. It brings with it the
need for re-examining Human resource practices from top to bottom need to be re-examined to
cope with the new strengths and challenges of diversity, so better approaches can be created by
management to recruit new talent, retain them, and manage them more effectively. Denton,
(1992).
Robinson et al., (1994) also cite that human resource managers are faced with the challenge of
convincing their senior management that diversity programs are beneficial to the organization.
Some organizational leaders are concerned that implementing diversity initiatives is too
expensive, upsets productivity and causes disruption in the workplace. Prejudice and hostile work
environments also pose internal stumbling blocks to managing workforce diversity effectively.
An important barrier that affects full integration of ethnic employees is the issue of poor
communication or lack of it by failure to overcome the various barriers to communication Loden
and Rosener, (1991).
According to Morrison (1992) managing diversity involves leveraging and using the cultural
differences in people’s skills, ideas and creativity to contribute to a common goal, and doing it in
a way that gives the organization a competitive edge.
         Lower group cohesiveness- diverse groups find it difficult to form a bond and be cohesive
          unlike similar groups who have things in common such as language, culture, background
          etc. in which they can relate to. The lack of group cohesiveness can result in a negative
          impact on teamwork and work performance in the organization.
         Communication problems- these occur when individuals assume that the other party
          understands the message they are conveying when in fact they do not. This leads to
          misunderstandings, communication problems, inaccuracies, and inefficiencies.
                                                 15
      Mistrust and tension- individuals tend to trust and associate with other individuals who
       are similar to them in terms of values and beliefs. Because of this misunderstandings and
       mistrust may occur between individuals who do not share the same values and beliefs.
2.7 Performance
Whereas performance refers to the act of performing; the carrying into execution or recognizable
action, achievement or accomplishment, in the undertaking of a duty, employee performance
refers to the effective discharge of one’s duty for good results. It is how well an employee is
fulfilling the requirements of the job Rue and Byars,( 1993). Cascio (2006) defines performance
as working effectiveness, that is, the way in which somebody does a job, judged by its
effectiveness. Performance management is one of the key areas DM (diversity management)
goals are integrated and aligned with the strategic objectives of the organization. DM has to be
linked to performance management system and one way to ensure the integration is to hold
mangers accountable for ensuring equity diversity inclusion by linking their performance
appraisal and compensation to the progress of diversity initiatives Kreitz, (2007).
                                                16
2.8 Relationship between Performance and Workforce Diversity
According to Fernandez (1993) argues that good workforce diversity practices in the area of
human resources are believed to enhance employee and organizational performance. This is
because managing diversity involves leveraging and using the cultural differences in people’s
skills, ideas and creativity to contribute to a common goal, and doing it in a way that gives the
organization a competitive edge. Hayles and Mendez (1997) add that even recent studies have
shown a strong correlation between good diversity practices and profits.
                                                 17
Conflict is not always negative. It depends how the conflict is handle. If handled properly, it can
become source of development; otherwise it creates hostilities Kigali, (2006). So it affects quality,
performance and profit of organization. Conflict is essential for life and dynamic for team
performance Medina et al., (2005). When managers ignore the clash between the co-workers,
those clashes will be converted into personal and emotional conflict in the long run and therefore
damages the organizational culture, worker morale and overall chap reduction of organizational
performance.
Relationship conflict negatively effects on the team performance and it breaks personal and
professional relations. Cascio (2000), defined performance as working effective which is the way
in which somebody does a job, judged by its effectiveness. It is how well an employee is fulfilling
the requirements of a job (Rue & Byars, 1993). Smith (2010), argued that good workforce
diversity practices in the area of human resources are believed to enhance employee and
organizational performance. According to Cornelius (1999), effective performance can be a key
determinant in the achievement of business objectives while maximizing the contribution of
employees. Schuler (1992), observed that a performance appraisal system should be objective,
relevant to the job and the organization, fair to all employees and offers no special treatment.
                                                 18
more attention to how different groups interact with one another at work. Opstal (2009) stated
that ethnic diversity can have both advantages and disadvantages for the organization. Jackson
et al. (2004) cited examples of ethnic diversity disadvantages as communication problems and
conflict. When managers ignore the clashes caused by ethnicity, they might be converted into
personal and emotional conflict in the long run and therefore damage organizational culture,
employee morale and overall sharp reduction of organizational performance. Kiglai (2006)
asserted that conflict resulting from ethnicity does affect quality, performance and profit of an
organization. Benschop (2001) cited discrimination as a disadvantage of ethnic diversity. Dahlin,
Weingart & Hinds (2005) argued that high degree of ethnicity might be negative since it can
create conflict and cliques due to social categorization.
                                                19
prefer to hire male employees compared with women because they are perceived to have better
performance and abilities to manage their jobs.
Diversity policies aim to increase the presence of minority groups in the workplace to achieve an
equitable balance between individuals with varying demographics in all departments and
positions within organizations. Policies such as EE (equal employment) and AA (affirmative
action) contain an immense level of legalities that force organizations to recruit and omit
discrimination against the two gender groups. Though laws such as AA and EE push companies
toward recruiting more minority groups, which women form part of and in so doing commit a
reverse discrimination against males Van Zyl & Roodt, (2003). Holistically the aim of employment
laws is to see women being recruited and moving up the corporate ladder equally as fast as
males, according to research females make for a rich organizational culture Gallego -Álvarez, et
al, (2010). Fundamentally for many organizations it would be ethically right to achieve a gender
balance Gallego-Álvarez, et al, (2010). Laws such as EE and AA has motivated organizations
because of the many advantages that high levels of gender diversity have for a firm.
According to Sipe, et al. (2009), the pros and cons of gender diversity programs relating to
diversity management are that women lag behind men in salary, a trend that could continue
which could hinder organizational development and organizations ability to meet its EE and AA
                                                20
targets. Inequitable decision making power and authority are usually less favorable for women
than men, which results in decreased career mobility and therefore women work in lower end
jobs.
Advantage                                                  Disadvantage
Promotes a better understanding of the Implies heterogeneous teams, which tend to
marketplace, thereby increasing its ability to communicate less frequently are usually less
penetrate markets.                             cooperative and experience more conflicts.
Enhances creativity and innovation inside the   May lead to the generation of discrepancies and
Corporation.                                    less speed in the decision-making process, because
                                                the leadership styles are different among males
Leads to more effective problem-solving since a and females
more diverse board provides a wider variety of
perspectives.                                   Can generate more opinions and critical questions
                                                inside heterogeneous boards that can be more
May improve the quality of the directors and time consuming.
managers if they are selected from both genders
without prejudice.
                                                   21
education an individual employee receives, the more productive the employee will be. Cohen
and Levinthal (2000), contended that the absorptive capacity of an organization is likely to
increase with variety in knowledge structures as reflected in diverse educational majors. Jehn
and Bezrukov (2004), observed that informational diversity, such as education and functional
areas were positively related to actual work group performances, although the relationship was
mediated by task conflict.
However, Cohen et al. (2000), observed that educational background can also negatively affect
team performance and social integration in teams. Horwitz (2005), discovered that heterogeneity
in education level was associated with turnover intention. Jehn, Northcraft & Neale (1999),
observed that wide differences in educational background led to increase in task-related debates
among work teams. Knight et al. (2009) found out that educational diversity was negatively
related to decision-making consensus in top management team.
They asserted that heterogeneous educational backgrounds tend to increase the level of
discomfort and conflict that may lead to decreased social integration in teams.
However, according to Eduard (2010), employees who are less educated are likely to suffer
inferiority complex, which to a large measure may affect their performance. He argued that such
employees might develop a persistent feeling of being inferior. Such employees end up feeling
socially insecure and they become less confident at work. He concluded that the lack of
confidence would greatly impair their performance and could even make them develop a
negative attitude toward other employees and the entire organization. At some instances, they
could become rebellious.
                                                 22
Figure 2.1: Relationship between race, leadership and the self-perceived communication
effectiveness of nursing care teams (NCT).
Source: Sprainer, et al, (2000). Relationship between race, leadership and the self-perceived
communication effectiveness of nursing care teams (NCT).
Sprainer, et al, (2000) found that Figure 2.1 is a visual representation of the resultant theoretical
model of how race ethnic influences the self-perceived communication effectiveness of nursing
care teams. It should be noted that, irrespective of team role or race, NCT members were
generally dissatisfied with the effectiveness of team communication.
According to Sprainer et al. (2000), the NCT members who did characterize communication
within their own NCT saw their team's performance as not representative and acknowledged
that communication within other NCTs was often tense with conflict and misunderstanding.
Based on Sprainer et al. (2000) study, effective communication, widely recognized as key to high
performing teams occur when sender and receiver share a common interpretation of the
communication exchange; example, when the intended message and the received message are
compatible. Effective communication is perhaps best viewed as an integrating mechanism.
Sprainer et al. (2000) study stated that unifies racially and ethnically diverse groups and, thereby,
enables teamwork.
                                                 23
Although communication as an integrating mechanism appears to be central to well-functioning
racially and ethnically diverse teams, the process of communication in racially and ethnically
diverse teams has not been the focus of group or team research. Maznevski, (1994).
According to Sprainer et al. (2000) it is stated that the purpose of the reanalysis was to develop
a grounded theory of the role that race plays in the self-perceived communication effectiveness
of nursing care teams.
Grounded theory differs from other qualitative methods due to its emphasis on theory
development and the associated requirement that the researchers interprets and categorize
respondents' answers into an overarching framework based on Sprainer et al. (2000) study
(Strauss and Corbin, 1994). Grounded theory analysis of the focus group transcripts resulted in
the identification of three additional themes that serve as reinforcing factors; example, these
themes deepen the conflict and miscommunication that occurs as a natural consequence of the
overarching framework of different perspectives and alternative realities. Sprainer et al., (2000).
According to Sprainer et al. (2000)’s study as Figure 2.2 illustrates, leadership emerged as a
powerful mitigating factor in the model of how race influences the self-perceived communication
effectiveness of nursing care teams. Sprainer et al. (2000) study stated that while conventional
approaches to leadership; example, approaches that deny or fail to address racial dynamics in
NCTs, appear to contribute to the social isolation, selective perception and stereotypes that
reinforce different perspectives and alternative realities, an alternative approach referred to as
diversity leadership Dreachslin, (1996) for a thorough discussion of this approach mitigates
against these same three reinforcing factors and enables NCT members to and common ground
and shared purpose within the overarching framework of different perspectives and alternative
realities.
                                                24
Source: Inmyxai and Takahashi (2010). Performance Comparison Derived from Human Resources
Between Male and Female Headed Firms in Lao MSMEs. International Reviews of Business Papers
Vol 6, No 2, 12-38.
Inmyxai and Takahashi (2010) presented that there are different effects on business performance
when gender; male or female headed a firm in different countries. The studies tested the result
of business performance on different gender. According to researchers, it is an incentive for
different gender headed firm to invest in different stages of business to maximize its performance
and build core competencies through diversifying its workforce thus, contribute better
performance compared with competitors.
Inmyxai and Takahashi, (2010); Cliff, (1998) argues that the liberal and social feminist theory
suggest that female entrepreneurs are reluctant to grow their businesses than males because
                                               25
they have fewer resources available such as insufficient business experience, a lack of freedom
from domestic role and less value for business expansion.
However, the liberal feminist theory proposes that if males and females have an equal
opportunity and condition to access resources available such as education, work experiences and
other resources, females are expected to behave in a similar way as males do Inmyxai and
Takahashi, (2010); Unger and Crawford, (1992), and eventually performance by different gender
headed firms may result in similar outcomes.
Source: Abbas, et al, (2010), Gender Discrimination and Its Effect on Employees Performance or
Productivity, 3rd Annual EuroMed Conference of the Euromed Academy of Business.
Recent studies identified that gender discrimination does affect employee’s performance.
Genders are defined as a range of differences between man and women, extending from a
biological to the social. Abbas, et al, (2010) suggest that there are three dimension of gender
discrimination; gender discrimination in hiring, gender discrimination in promotion and gender
discrimination in provision of goods and facilities.
                                                 26
According to Abbas et al., (2010), women does not have an upper hand when it comes to hiring
compared with men. There are also women discrimination in superintendent salary or getting
promotion. Female superintendent who replace male superintendent gets a lower salary level.
Other than that, it shows that gender discrimination effects employees performance as well as
organization’s productivity.
Abbas et al., (2010); Patrick Francois, (1998) provides explanation that the continuation of gender
discrimination and competitive labor markets and analyzes the effects on employee’s
performance. The literature shows that on average, women receive lower earning than men. The
difference persists even when controlling hours for work, industry of work and human capital
characteristics suggest that this provides evidence of wage discrimination against women.
The study presented that even though there are quotas for their presentation of female in an
organization; it was superficial as the representative was appointed but the bodies were less or
more powerless.
2.10.3.1 Conscientiousness
Barrick and Mount (1993) described those high in conscientiousness as ideal employees because
these individuals possess responsible, dependable, persistent, and achievement-oriented traits.
Conscientiousness employees tend to be ambitious, exacting, methodical, and disciplined,
whereas individuals low in conscientiousness tend to be imprecise, impetuous, and disorganized
Gellatly, (1996). Conscientious individuals are expected to perform at a higher level because they
are, by predisposition, more persevering and disciplined Colquitt and Simmering, (1998), as well
as more confident in their abilities Barrick and Mount, (1991). As such, they are likely more
effective in identifying key priorities and contributing activities that support organizational
objectives.
                                                27
 (Witt, et al, 2002), and extraversion (Witt, 2002) as intervening factors. However, in the search
 for moderators, a significant concern related to unexpected inverse relationships between
 conscientiousness and performance has surfaced Driskell et al, (1994). As a result, the continued
 search for appropriate moderating variables is necessary to further supplement our knowledge
 and provide insight into the conscientiousness–performance relationship.
Gender Diversity
Education Background
      Diversity
 2.11.2 Hypothesis
 Based on the research objective and the proposed conceptual frame work/ model stated in the
 above, then the following hypothesis is presumed:
 H1: There is a significant relationship between gender diversity and employee performance
                                                 28
H2: There is a significant relationship between ethnic diversity and employee performance
H3: There is a significant relationship in the performance of employees on the basis of the level
of education.
                                               29
                                     CHAPTER THREE
                              3. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
3.1 Introduction
This chapter outlined the methods of research, provided guidance to implementation of the
research towards the realization of the objectives. Having considered the underpinning theories,
and the research questions, this section described the background to this study from the
methodological point of view. The following section covered; research design, population,
sampling technique instruments, sampling frame, sample size and, data collection procedures,
questionnaire design, data processing and analysis finally ethical consideration of the researcher.
Population refers to the entire group of people, events, or things that the researcher wishes to
investigate. Sekaran (2003). The company that was targeted is Addis Credit and Saving Institution.
Therefore, the target population for this research were the employees in head office and kirkos
district microfinance institution which consists of 87 and 35 respectively. Generally, the
population of the study is 122.
                                                30
Table 3.1: Population Framework.
              Branch                        No of staff                   Percentage
The study draws sample from all employees of the selected branches of the institution, the
sample and the formula below used to calculate sample size, according to (kothari, 2004).
Where,
n is the sample size
N: the total Population size
Z α /2: normal reduced variable at 0.05 level of significance z is 1.96
P: population reliability (or frequency estimated for a sample of size n), where p is 0.5
q = 1-p
e: margin of error considered is 5 % for this study.
Thus,
n=        (1.96)2 *0.5*0.5*122
         (0.05)2(122-1) + (1.96)2*0.5*0.5
n = 117.1688
        1.2629
n = 93
Therefore, the sample size is 93
                                                  31
3.5 Sampling Technique
The sampling technique in this study was stratified random sampling. Stratified random sampling
is a modification of random sampling in which researcher divide the population into two or more
relevant and significant strata based on one or a number of attributes Saunders, et.al (2009).
Thus, this technique was chosen because the population of the study consists of head office and
kirkos district staff, each being a stratum. This technique done first, by identifying each of two
staffs within the target population as a stratum and then both samples were divided for each
stratum through adopting proportional allocation as shown below.
       n ×Nh
nh =              , Where nh is the number of samples to be determined in each stratum (i.e. head office
            N
Finally, the following samples were taken from each stratum summarized below in Table 3. 2.
Table 3. 2: Sampling Frame
 Stratum of Employees                  Population   Population proportion    Sample Size   Percentage
            Head office                       87              0.71               66            71
           Kirkos district                    35              0.29               27            29
                 Total                    122                  1                 93           100
Source: Researchers’ own
                                                         32
3.6 Procedure for Data Gathering
The data gathering process was quantitative research process. The primary and secondary
sources were used to gather relevant data. The primary data were collected using survey
questionnaires with employees of Addis Credit and Saving Institution with subject matter.
Secondary data were also collected from HRM office, publications, books, journal articles,
company’s yearly magazine and online materials from the web. For this study, the research
instrument used is self-administered questionnaire. Self-administered questionnaire required
respondent takes the responsibility to read and answer the questions.
Measurement or questionnaire adopted from several journals was used to ensure higher validity.
The questionnaire adopted for this research undertaking, is known as the Workforce diversity
survey. The decision to utilize the particular measuring instrument is because its psychometric
properties were evident, and the questionnaire had been used in a number of empirical studies.
Cooper & Schindler (2003). The questions consisted of 5 point Likert scale where the respondent
expected to strongly agree, agree, neutral, disagree and strongly disagree with carefully
constructed that ranged from very positive to very negative toward an attitudinal phenomenon.
The questionnaire was tested by Pilot teste using Cronbach reliability coefficient testing.
Cronbach’s Alpha can be interpreted as percentage of variance where the observed scale would
explain in hypothetical true scale composed of all possible items in the universe. According to
Zikmund et. al., (2010) scales with coefficient alpha score of 0.6 and 0.7 indicate fair reliability,
a Cronbach’s alpha score of .70 or higher and considered as adequate to determine reliability. An
alpha coefficient of 0.7 was obtained. Thus, the data generation was reliable and free of random
error.
The biographical section required information with respect to gender, age, ethnic group, branch,
level of education, and service year.
                                                 33
3.7.2 Work Force Diversity Survey
(Section B, C, D, E): consists of three independent variables which is to determine the main
effects of workforce diversity towards employee’s performance. Each variable consists of 5 to 9
questions to be answered by respondents. Section E consists of 10 questions that talked about
dependent variable employee’s performance.
After designing the questionnaire, reliability analysis was done to ensure measurements are
reliable for the research. Pilot test is a survey which is done on a small group of respondents to
make sure the questions being asked in the questionnaire are reliable. 20 sets of questionnaires
have been distributed. Respondents were asked to comment and suggest changes to the
questionnaire. Most of the feedbacks directed to the comprehensibility of items; therefore,
researcher modified and inserted some of the items to improve their clarities. Pilot test minimizes
the mistakes made in the questionnaire as well as the difficulties before making progress to
distribute it out to the 93 targeted respondents. Reliability of the questionnaire was tested as
well using reliability test with the help of Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS) software.
The result of pilot test is shown below:
                                                34
Table 3.4: Reliability Test
 NO        Constructs                          Cronbach Alpha              No of Items
 1         Gender                              0.807                                 9
 2         Ethnicity                           0.712                                 7
 3         Education back ground               0.735                                 6
 4         Employee performance                0.736                                10
Source: Developed for research from SPSS version 20
The Cronbach alpha for gender diversity, ethnic diversity, and education background diversity
and employee performance was measured using 9, 7, 6 and 10 questions respectively. Cronbach
alpha values estimated are higher than 0.70, the internal consistency of the survey is found to be
good.
In order to ensure the validity of the research instrument, the researcher gave the draft
questionnaire to the advisor and senior colleagues in the field to evaluate appropriateness of the
items and to ensure that all the questions asked in the questionnaire fully exhaust all that are
implied by the research questions, objectives and the formulated hypotheses. In addition,
feedback from the pilot survey were another way of checking the appropriateness of the
question.
3. 9 Data Processing
Data processing is a class of programs that organize and manipulate data which is usually large
amounts of numeric data and convert data into usable information. In data processing, there are
generally few steps which include data checking, data editing, data coding, data transcribing and
data cleaning. After completing the questionnaires, checked to allow early detection of any
problems and also appropriateness of the questions by conducting the pilot test; whether any
corrections or amendments that is needed before conducting the real survey. the second step
were the collected data checked whether any mistakes made by either the researcher or
respondent. Then data editing process were conducted to ensure the information provided was
accurate, complete, and consistent. Data coding is to assign a code with a specific numerical value
                                                35
in response to each specific question on the survey instrument. Finally coded data from the
questionnaires inserted directly into computers and transcribed into SPSS software for data
analysis.
Descriptive statistics are used to describe the basic features or provide a concise summary of the
data in a study. They provide simple summaries about the data numerically or graphically.
Together with simple graphics analysis, they form the basis of virtually every quantitative analysis
of data. Descriptive statistics are used to present quantitative description in a managerial form,
helps us to simplify large amounts of data in a sensible way, reduces lots of data into a simpler
summary, and provide a powerful summary that may enable comparisons across.
Of the most common descriptive statistics (tabular, diagrammatic, and measures of central
tendency or dispersion), this study uses:
   1. Frequency distribution
   2. Bar chart and pie chart
   3. Mean and standard deviation
                                                36
3.10.2.1 Correlation Analysis
A Pearson correlation measures the strength of the linear relationship between two variables. A
linear relationship is one that can be captured by drawing a straight line on a scatter plot between
the two variables of interest. The value of the correlation which ranges between -1.0 and 1.0
provides information both about the nature and the strength of the relationship. The sign of the
correlation describes the direction of the relationship. A positive sign indicates that as one
variable gets larger the other also tends to get larger, while a negative sign indicates that as one
variable gets larger the other tends to get smaller. The magnitude of the correlation describes
the strength of the relationship. The further that a correlation is from zero, the stronger the
relationship is between the two variables. A zero correlation would indicate that the two
variables aren’t related to each other at all. Correlations only measure the strength of the linear
relationship between the two variables.
The Pearson correlation coefficient denoted by r between two variables is given by:
                𝑛 ∑𝑛         𝑛        𝑛
                   𝑖=1 𝑥𝑦 −(∑𝑖=1 𝑥 )(∑𝑖=1 𝑦)
r=                              2                           2
     √[𝑛 ∑𝑛    2   𝑛            𝑛    2   𝑛
          𝑖=1 𝑥 −(∑𝑖=1 𝑥 ) ][𝑛 ∑𝑖=1 𝑦 −(∑𝑖=1 𝑦) ]
Regression is a statistical tool that allows predicting the value of one continuous variable from
one or more other variables. When performing a regression analysis, a regression equation
predicts the values of the dependent variable using the values of your independent variables.
Each independent variable is associated with specific coefficients in the equation that
summarizes the relationship between that independent variable and the dependent variable.
                                                 37
Multiple linear regression attempts to model the relationship between two or more explanatory
variables and a response variable by fitting a linear equation to observed data. Every value of the
independent variable x is associated with a value of the dependent variable y.
Multiple regression allows to build an equation predicting the value of the dependent variable
from the values of two or more that independent variables. The parameters of this equation can
be used to relate the variability in the dependent variable to the variability in specific
independent variables.
The linear model is:
Y   0  1 X 1   2 X 2  ...   k X k + 𝜀
Where,
Y is the dependant variable
β0 is the regression constant
Xi’s (X1, X2, … , XK) are explanatory or dependant variables
βi’s (β1, β2, … , βK) are regression coefficients
𝜀 is the random disturbance term
The one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) is used to determine whether there are any
statistically significant differences between the means of three or more independent (unrelated)
groups. According to Hair et al. (2007), ANOVA is used to assess the statistical differences
between the means of two or more groups. ANOVA also helps researchers to examine the
research problem that involves several independent variables.
The one-way ANOVA compares the means between the groups you are interested in and
determines whether any of those means are statistically significantly different from each other.
Specifically, it tests the null hypothesis:
                                                    38
Where, µ = group mean and k = number of groups. If, however, the one-way ANOVA returns a
statistically significant result, we accept the alternative hypothesis (HA), which is that there are
at least two group means that are statistically significantly different from each other.
Researchers used one-way ANOVA to test if any significant difference between gender diversity,
ethnic diversity, and educational diversity with the employee performance in an organization.
The participants in this study was selected with full consent and informed to respond for
questionnaires with confidence and understanding the purpose of the thesis, and the researcher
was assuring that as she will keep the information confidential and the data will be used only for
academic purpose.
                                                39
                                      CHAPTER FOUR
This chapter presents and discusses the results obtained from reliability analysis of the data
collection instruments and describes the study participants based on demographics data. Then
the respondent's demographic profile and descriptive analysis is used to summarize basic
features of the quantitative data collected and finally inferential analysis is used to infer from
sample data to the whole population are discussed at length in this chapter.
The statistical analyses presented in this thesis were done using SPSS statistical software package
and Microsoft Excel.
Response rate, the percentage of people who respond to a survey is important, and shouldn’t be
left to chance. High survey response rates help to ensure that survey results are representative
of the target population. A survey must have a good response rate in order to produce accurate,
useful results.
The essence of determining the response rate is to enquire whether it is sufficient enough to
generalize the results to the target population (Mungai, 2015). Generally, 93 questionnaires were
distributed to sample respondents of the two categories of the Addis Credit and Saving Institution
(ADCSI) which consists of 66 employees working in head office and 27 in kirkose district.
Response rates are calculated by dividing the number of usable responses returned by the total
number of eligible in the sample. Mitchell (2007) suggests that the survey response rate should
be calculated as the number of returned questionnaires divided by the total sample who were
sent the survey initially.
Therefore, out of the distributed questionnaires (93, in all 85 questionnaires from (head office
60, and kirkose district 25) were returned. Thus, as shown in table 1, the researcher attained a
total response rate of 91.40% which believe to be encouraging. This high response was achieved
because the survey was personally administered.
                                                40
        Table 4.1 Respondents Response Rate
The research discusses demographic profile of the respondent's and central tendencies
measurement of constructs.
In the questionnaire survey, each respondent was asked five questions regarding their
demographic profile. This part provides an analysis of the demographic information which
includes gender, age, working experience (in years), ethnicity, educational level and branch in
the institution of the sampled respondents based on frequency analysis obtained from the
questionnaire survey.
4.2.1.1 Gender
                  Frequency          Percent
        male                  37                43.5
Total 85 100.0
Table 4.2 shows the gender distribution of respondents. Male respondents constituted 43.5%,
while 56.5% were female. In other words, from the 85 respondents, 37 of them are male while
the remaining 48 are female. The data is showing that the female gender is prominent when we
compare with male gender.
                                                       41
4.2.1.2 Age
                      Frequency                  Percent
18-30 33 38.8
31-40 36 42.4
51-60 1 1.2
Total 85 100.0
Table 4. 3 and figure 1 show the age of characteristics of respondents. 42.4% and 38.8% are
within the age group of 31-40 and 18 – 30 respectively, while 81.2% are cumulatively within the
age group of 18-40. The data shows that a relatively high proportion of the workforce is in their
active productive years.
Frequency Percent
0-5 52 61.2
        6-10                     29                   34.1
Valid
        11-15                     4                       4.7
Total 85 100.0
Table 4 4 shows that the highest proportion of respondents with 0 – 5 years of working
experience (61.2% or 52 respondents), followed by 6 – 10 years (34.1% or 29 respondents), and
there are less number of respondents working more than 15 years (4.7% or 4 respondents) in the
organization.
                                                     42
4.2.1.4 Ethnicity (Nationality)
                        28.20%                       24.70%
                                                                                  Oromo
                                                                                  Amhara
                                                              11.80%
                                                                                  Tigray
                  14.10%
                                                                                  SNNPR
                                        21.20%
                                                                                  Others
Figure 4.1 shows that the highest proportion of respondents are Oromo (24.7 %), followed by
Tigray 21.2%), and the smallest proportion of the respondents are Amhara (11.8%) in the
organization.
Frequency Percent
Diploma 47 55.3
Total 85 100.0
Table 4.5 shows that, 14.1% of the respondents are the background of below diploma, while
55.3% of the respondents are from diploma-graduation and 29.4% of the respondents are first
degree holders. Since the Credit and Saving Institution is highly growing institution in Ethiopia,
                                                      43
more people are working with good background in their education levels. Cumulatively 84.7%
are from both diploma and first degree; it resembles the importance of education in Credit and
Saving Institution jobs of Ethiopia
Frequency Percent
Total 85 100.0
Table 4.6 shows that, the majority of the respondents (60%) working in the head office while the
remaining 25% working in Kirkos branch.
4.2.1.7 Cross Tabulation (Gender * Age, Educational Level * Gender, and Ethnicity * Educational
Level)
Cross-tabulation is one of the most frequently used methods of analysis for questionnaire data.
It enables us to examine the relationship between categorical variables in greater detail than
simple frequencies for individual variables. The following table shows the statistical analysis
associated with cross tabulation between diversity predictors.
                                               44
     Table 4. 7: Cross Tabulation between Diversity Predictors
Age Total
             male              8               19                 9                    1               37
 Gender
             female            25              17                 6                    0               48
 Total                         33              36                15                    1               85
             male                     4                16                  17                               0               37
 Gender
             female                   8                31                      8                            1               48
 Total                              12                 47                  25                               1               85
Oromo 3 13 5 0 21
Amara 0 4 6 0 10
Ethnicity Tigray 2 12 3 1 18
SNNPR 2 5 5 0 12
             Other                        5             13                         6                            0            24
 Total                                12                47                     25                               1            85
                                                                45
From table 4.7 we can see the numbers of males and females who were treated by each age
category. In particular, we can see that the majority (48) are females. Clearly then, the
proportions of male/female were not equally distributed across the four age groups: more of the
respondents were within the age group between 31 - 40, and from 51 - 60 tended to only one
respondent. Again, the proportions of male/female were not equally distributed across the four
educational level meaning that the below diploma and diploma educational levels tended to
females, and the first degree educational level tended to male employees. More of the
employees (55%) in Addis Credit and Saving Institution (ADCSI) were diploma. The educational
level of all Amhara employees in Addis Credit and Saving Institution (ADCSI) were diploma and
above, while the majority of the Oromo employees were diploma and below. Finally, from all
employees working Addis Credit and Saving Institution (ADCSI) there is no any second degree and
above except from one from Tigray ethnicity indicating that the institution must allow its
employees to pursue their second degree from all ethnicity.
                                                                                 ̅) and
Measurement of central tendencies (MCT) is used to discover the average or mean (𝒙
standard deviation (S) for the five interval-scaled constructs. t. All of the items/questions for all
the variables are being asked using 5-point Likert scale with 1 indicating ―Strongly Disagree, 2
indicating ―Disagree, 3 indicating ―Neutral, 4 indicating ―Agree, and 5 indicating ―Strongly
Agree. For each item (questions) the impact of each independent variables (gender, ethnicity,
and educational background) on the dependant variable (Employee Performance) with particular
percentage, mean and standard deviation were obtained.
Table 4.8: The Effects of Gender Diversity on Employee Performance
                                Strongly   Disagree Neutral Agree          Strongly    Mean      Standard
                                Disagree                                   Agree        ̅)
                                                                                       (𝒙        Deviation(S)
 Employees       are     not 8.2 %         30.6%        21.2%   29.4 %     10.6 %      3.04      1.17
 discriminated         during
                                                   46
hiring and recruitment
process on gender basis
ADCSI does a good job of 3.5 %          21.2%        23.5%    30.6 %   21.2 %   3.45   1.15
attracting      and      hiring
women
At ADCSI fair treatment is 4.7%         29.4%        34.1 %   23.5 %   8.2 %    3.01   1.03
given to all employees
whether male or female.
The        transformational 3.5 %       22.4%        23.5 %   38.8 %   11.8 %   3.33   1.06
leadership style of the
female             employee
contributed        to      the
success of the team.
Gender       diverse     team 3.5 %     15.3%        17.6 %   41.2 %   22.4 %   3.63   1.10
showed better problem
solving      and       decision
making skills than gender
homogenous teams.
A career development 2.4 %              25.9%        23.5 %   27.1 %   21.2 %   3.39   1.16
that includes women is
encouraged at the ADCSI
Training                   and 14.1 %   29.4%        20.0 %   23.5 %   12.9 %   2.92   1.27
development program is
structured to meet the
criteria/ requirement of
male and female gender.
Gender       diverse     teams 3.5 %    25.9%        24.7 %   28.2%    17.6 %   3.31   1.14
achieved target due to
                                                47
 the good relationship and
 effective communication
 I   am    positive   about 3.5 %       18.8%        20.0 %   37.6 %   20.0 %      3.52     1.12
 gender diversity at the
 ADCSI
The average number of respondents to the statement“ Gender diversity or gender diverse team
showed better problem solving and decision making skills than gender homogenous ” has the
highest mean score (𝑥̅ = 3.63), while “Training and development program is structured to meet
the criteria/ requirement of male and female gender” has the lowest average or mean number
of respondents ( 𝑥̅ = 2.92).
The maximum variability of the respondents is occurred to the item “Employees are not
discriminated during hiring and recruitment process on gender basis” with standard deviation (S
= 1.17), while the minimum variability of the respondents is occurred to the statement “Gender
diverse team showed better problem solving and decision making skills than gender homogenous
teams” having standard deviation ( S = 0.10).
Higher number of the respondents (30.6%) disagreed that he/she have been discriminated by
employer while hiring and recruitment process, while 29.4% of them agreed with that statement.
30.6% of the respondents agreed that they feel the institution does a good job of attracting and
hiring women, while 23.5% of them neither agreed nor disagreed with that statement. Mean
while, 29.4% of the respondents disagreed that fair treatment is given to all employees whether
they are male or female and 31.4% of them neither agreed nor disagreed with that statement.
The maximum number of the respondents (38.8%) agreed with transformational leadership style
of the female employee contributed to the success of the team but the minimum number of the
respondents (3.5%) strongly disagreed with the statement. 41.2% of respondents agreed that
gender diversity plays a key role in problem solving and decision making processes while only a
                                                48
few respondents 3.5% strongly disagreed. The higher of the respondents 27.1% agreed with
career development that includes women is encouraged within the institution and 25.9% of them
disagreed. For the statement, the institutions’ training and development program is structured
to meet the criteria/requirement of the male and female gender there is 29.4% of respondent
disagreed and 23.5% of them agreed. 28.2% of respondents agreed that gender diverse teams
achieved target due to good communication relation within the institution while 25.9% of them
strongly disagreed. Finally, 37.6% of the respondents agreed that they think positive about
gender diversity in the institution, while only 3.5% of them strongly disagreed with this
statement.
                                                49
 The ethnic diversity in our 5.9 %      28.2%        29.4 %   28.2 %       8.2 %    3.05   1.07
 team helped to expedite
 the completion of our
 task on time
 The ethnic differences in 4.7%         25.9%        24.7 %   24.7 %       20.0 %   3.29   1.19
 work   groups    do       not
 encourage conflict.
 I am positive about ethnic 8.2 %       23.5%        27.1 %   27.1 %       14.1 %   3.15   1.18
 diversity at the ADCSI
The highest average number of respondents (𝑥̅ = 3.40) are favored to the statement “institution
attracts and hires employees from all ethnic background”, while “ethnic diversity in the team
helped to expedite the completion of our task on time” has the lowest average number of
respondents (𝑥̅ = 3.05).
The maximum variability of the respondents is occurred to the items “institution attracts and
hires employees from all ethnic background” and “ethnic differences in work groups do not
encourage conflict” with standard deviation (S = 1.19), while the minimum variability of the
respondents is occurred to the statement “ethnic diversity in the team helped to expedite the
completion of their task on time” having standard deviation ( S = 1.07).
(38.8%) of the respondents agreed that the institution attracts and hires employees from all
ethnic background, while only 5.9% of them strongly disagreed with the statement. Higher
number of the respondents 29.4% agreed that the opportunities for growth and advancement
exist for all ethnic groups, but 8.2% of them disagreed. Mean while, the same percentage of the
respondents 28.24% are neutral and disagreed that the ethnic diversity in the team promoted
free flow of information between ethnic groups as well as again 30.6% of the respondents are
neutral and disagreed that different languages used to communicate create problems among
                                                50
employee. The statement “The ethnic diversity in the team helped to expedite the completion of
their task on time” is favored and in favored by the number of the respondents (28.2%) but the
maximum number of the respondents 29.4% are neutral. The higher number of the respondents
(25.9%) disagreed with ethnic differences in work groups do not encourage conflict but the same
percentage of the respondents 24.7% are neutral and disagreed. Finally, 27.1% of the
respondents agreed and remains neutral that they are thinking positive about gender ethnic
diversity in the institution, while the minimum number of respondents 8.2% strongly disagreed
with this statement.
                                                   51
 background do not bring
 conflict among employee
 As an employee of ADCSI, 7.1 %          21.2%        17.6 %   41.2 %    12.9 %       3.32     1.16
 l    experience    lack   of
 confidence due to my
 educational background.
 ADCSI      gives      equal 11.8%       36.5%        27.1 %   21.2 %    3.5 %        2.68     1.05
 treatment when it comes
 to            educational
 background.
The highest average number of respondents (𝑥̅ =3.32) experience lack of confidence due to their
educational background, while the minimum number respondents in average (𝑥̅ =2.68) didn’t
have equal treatment when they comes to educational background.
There exist greater variability on the respondents (S = 1.57) at the institution is occurred due to
differences in educational background do not bring conflict among them, while the minimum
variability of the respondents is existed to the statement “the institution provides paid study
leave to employees who further their education” having standard deviation ( S = 1.04).
The recruitment plan of the institution is based on the educational background of applicants is
favored by the maximum number of the respondents 28.2%, while 25.5% and 8.2% of the
respondents are disagreed and strongly disagreed respectively that the recruitment plan of the
institution is based on the education background of the applicants. Higher number of the
respondents 36.5% disagreed that the institution provides paid study leave to employees who
further their education and only small number of respondents 3.5% strongly agree to the
statement. 30.6% of the respondents agreed and 29.4% of them neither agreed nor disagreed
that “opportunities for growth and advancement exist for employees who have lower
                                                 52
qualification in education”, while 5.9% of them strongly disagreed with that statement. The same
percentage of the respondents 30.6% agreed and neither agreed or disagreed to the item “at the
institution differences in educational background do not bring conflict among employee”. 41.2%
of the respondents agreed that at work, they experience lack of confidence due to their
education background, while 21.2% of them disagreed with that statement. 36.5% of the
respondents disagreed and 27.1% of them neither agreed nor disagreed that their institution
gives equal treatment when it comes to the diversity of education background.
                                                  53
 You      are        satisfied 16.5 %    36.5%        21.2 %   21.2 %    4.7 %        2.61     1.13
 regarding your associate
 works
 At the ADCSI employees 5.9 %            29.4%        30.6 %   25.9 %    8.2 %        3.01     1.06
 are given a chance to
 apply their own methods
 of doing their work.
 Training given by the 4.7 %             17.6%        27.1 %   34.1%     16.5 %       3.40     1.10
 company encourage me
 to work better
 At ADCSI employees with 34.7 %          22.4%        29.4 %   32.9 %    10.6 %       3.22     1.06
 higher           educational
 qualifications      perform
 better than those with
 lower qualification.
 Good     employee      work 0%          17.6%        23.5%    36.5%     22.4%        3.64     1.02
 performance is important
 for the future growth of
 the ADCSI
The highest average number of respondents (𝑥̅ =3.8) are committed to the mission and vision of
the institution and love their work and are motivated to complete the tasks that are assigned to
their always, while the minimum number respondents in average (𝑥̅ = 2.61) are happy with their
current salary.
There exists greater variability on the respondents (S = 1.20) at the institution due to their
performance level has direct effect on their current salary level, while the minimum variability of
                                                 54
the respondents is existed to the statement “they are always committed to the mission and vision
of the institution” having standard deviation (S = 0.91).
31.8% the respondents enjoyed with their tasks and division of work approach and 4.7% strongly
disagreed. All most half of the respondents 45.9% agreed about their commitment to the mission
and vision of their institution. 43.5% of the respondents love their work and are motivated to
complete the tasks that are assigned always to their and 24.7% of them strongly agreed with this.
The same percentage of the respondents 28.2% agreed and disagreed to the item about “their
co-operation well with their colleagues of different ethnic backgrounds”. 34.1% of the
respondents agreed that at work, their performance level has direct effect on their salary level,
while 23.5% of them disagreed with that statement. 36.5% of the respondents are not happy
with their current salary and only a few numbers of respondents 4.7% are happy with their
current salary. 29.4% of the employees are not given a chance to apply their own method of
doing their work while 30.6% of them are neither agreed nor disagreed. 34.1% of the employees
improved their work performance due to the training given by the institution while only 4.7% of
them cannot improve their work performance due to the training given by the institution.
Employees with higher educational qualifications cannot perform better than those with lower
qualification as 34.7% of them agreed with the statement but 32.67% of the employees say that
employees with higher educational qualifications cannot perform better than those with lower
qualification. Finally, 36.5% of the respondents accepted that good employee work performance
is important for the future growth of the institution but there is no any employees strongly
disagreed with this statement.
Here, researcher present the correlation analysis of the heterogeneous factors investigated with
the measures employee performance. The value of the correlation provides information both
about the nature and the strength of the relationship. Pearson’s correlation coefficient (R 2)
measures the strength of the linear relationship between two continuous variables, indicate the
direction, strength and significant of the bivariate relationship among all the variables that were
                                                55
  measured (i.e. gender, ethnicity, and education background). The following table shows these
  relationships.
  The above table 4.12 indicates clearly among the variables (i.e. diversity predictors) there exist
  positive correlation between them i.e. as the value of one variable increases or decreases the
  other variable will also increase or decreases at the same direction since the value of the
  Pearson’s correlation coefficient (R2) is between greater than 0 and less or equal to 1. Clearly
  among all the variables gender has high positive correlation with other variables as well as all the
  diversity predictors have positive correlation with employee performance.
  The relationship between ethnic diversity and gender diversity with employee performance is
  significant because their p-value 0.000 is less than alpha value 0.01 but the relationship between
  educational diversity and employee performance is not significant because its p-value 0.228 is
  greater than alpha value 0.01.
  This section provides an F test for the statistical model. If this F is significant, it indicates that the
  model as a whole that is, all independent variables as a whole (Educational Diversity, Ethnic
                                                     56
Diversity, and Gender Diversity) combined predicts significantly more variability in the dependant
variable (Employee Performance) compared to a null model that only has an intercept parameter.
Total 41.012 84
From the above ANOVA statistics in Table 4.13, the study established the regression model had
a significance level of 0.000 which is an indication that the data was ideal for making a conclusion
on the population parameters as the value of significance (p-value) was less than 0.05 or 5%. The
calculated value was greater than the critical value (8.662 > 2.717) an indication that Educational
Diversity, Ethnic Diversity, and Gender Diversity all affect employee performance. The
significance value was less than 0.05 indicating that the model was significant.
The study used multiple linear regression analysis so as to establish the mathematical model
showing how the independent variables and dependent variable that is employee performance
are interrelated at Addis Credit and Saving Institution (ADCSI). Adjusted R squared is coefficient
of determination which tells us the variation in the dependent variable due to changes in the
independent variable.
                                                                          57
The value of adjusted R squared as a measure of model fitted by the significant variables was
0.215 an indication that there was variation of 21.5 percent on employee performance due to
changes in Ethnic Diversity and Gender Diversity at 95 percent confidence interval. This shows
that 21.5 percent changes in employee performance in Addis Credit and Saving Institution
(ADCSI) could be accounted to Ethnic Diversity and Gender Diversity. R is the correlation
coefficient which shows the relationship between the study variables, from the findings shown
in the Table 4.14 is notable that there exists moderate positive relationship between the study
variables as shown by 0.493. Besides that, the coefficient of determination (R square) can help
us in explaining variance. The R square figure of the three independent variables is 0.243. These
also mean that independent variables (Educational Diversity, Ethnic Diversity, and Gender
Diversity) can explain 24.3% of the variation in dependent variable (employee performance).
However, it is still leaves 75.7% (100% - 24.3%) unexplained in this research. In other words, there
are other additional variables that are important in explaining employee performance that have
not been considered in this research.
The following table 4.15 shows the regression coefficients of the independent variables
(diversity predictors).
The findings revealed that ethnic diversity, gender diversity, and educational diversity to a
constant zero, employee performance in Addis Credit and Saving Institution (ADCSI) would be at
1.521, at one percent change in ethnic diversity would lead to increase employee performance
in Addis Credit and Saving Institution (ADCSI) by a variations of 0.225%, at a one percent increase
in gender diversity would increase employee performance in Addis Credit and Saving Institution
                                                         58
(ADCSI) by a variations of 0.271%, and a at one percent change in educational diversity would
increase employee performance in Addis Credit and Saving Institution by a variations of 0.076%.
Further, the study established that both the variables ethnic diversity and gender diversity were
significant as their significant value was less than (p<0.05) but not educational diversity since its
p-value is greater than 0.05. At 5% level of significance, ethnic diversity had a p-value of 0.006;
gender diversity had a p-value of 0.003 and educational diversity had a p-value of 0.370.
Therefore, the most significant factor is gender diversity.
Finally, from the data in Table 4.15, the study established the fitted regression equation:
Therefore,
Employee performance in Addis Credit and Saving Institution (ADCSI) = 1.521 + (0.225 x Ethnic
Diversity) + (0.271 x Gender Diversity).
From the results of this study, Gender diversity contributed more to the Employee performance
in Addis Credit and Saving Institution (ADCSI).
                                                  59
Table 4.16 Summary of the Result of research Hypotheses
H1: There is significant relationship between gender diversity and employee performance.
Based on the result, there is significant positive relationship between gender diversity and
employee performance which carries correlation coefficient value of 0.401 and p-value of 0.000
which is significant at the alpha value 0.01.
The finding in this research showed that gender group and employee performance is positively
linked. Based on the information provided in the research the overall feeling is that, for the most
part, gender was not an area of concern. All divisions of the company must meet annual targets
for the representation of majority and minority males and females in each employee grade level
(Kochan, Bezrukova and Ely, 2002)
H1: There is significant relationship between ethnicity group and employee performance.
                                                   60
Based on the result, there is significant positive relationship between ethnicity group and
employee performance which carries correlation coefficient value of 0.377 and p-value
of 0.000 which is significant at the alpha value 0.01.
When examined the role of ethnic diversity, researcher found a slightly different pattern.
However, there is a significant moderating effect of company ethnic demography. Ethnically
diverse teams working in relatively homogeneous organizations experienced performance
deficits relative to the more homogeneous teams (Joshi and Jackson, 2003). Furthermore, the
performance deficit was not evident for ethnically diverse teams working in ethnically diverse
organizations. Given the nature of the tasks performed by these teams, this finding is consistent
with reserch predictions.
In ethnically homogeneous organizations, the ethnic differences among members of diverse
teams become more salient and are more likely to interfere with performance. In ethnically
heterogeneous organizations, however, the ethnic identities of team members may be less
salient and therefore they create less disruption (Joshi and Jackson, 2003).
H0: There is no significant relationship between education background diversity and employee
performance.
Based on the result, there is no significant positive relationship between education background
group and employee performance which carries correlation coefficient value of 0.132
and p-value of 0.228 which is greater than the alpha value 0.01.
Different education types, or a more balance in the education types a firm possesses would
increase the likelihood of having an innovation. There is a bias in the education diversity measure,
since it measures diversity within the highly educated group, meaning the employees with a
bachelor degree or higher. All employees with a degree below bachelor are put in a single
category. According to the Ostergaard (2002), as a result a higher entropy value can be explained
by having a larger share of employees with a higher education and multiple types of higher
educated people. Having a higher educated employee alone would be positive for innovation
performance, having more different types would increase the likelihood. (Ostergaard, 2002).
                                                 61
Firms with a higher share of employees with a higher education and diversity in the types of
educations have a higher likelihood of innovating.
Although education is essential to human capital, on job training, heath care, experience and
migration also have great effect on the actual human capital. Growth-oriented strategies
moderated the effects of group diversity in level of education on composite bonuses; this type
of diversity was more beneficial in department with a strong focus on growth oriented strategies
Bezrukova, (2004). An organization may make an effort to compensate for educational or skill
deficiencies of group members by offering specialized training that brings employees up to the
required standards (Moskos and Butler, 1996)
                                               62
                                       CHAPTER FIVE
                SUMMARY, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
5.1 Introduction
This chapter presents the discussion of the research findings. The descriptive analysis presented
in previous chapter is summarized. In addition, the recommendations of the researcher are
included. The last section of this chapter gives the overall conclusion of the entire research
project.
                                               63
which the finding is supported the same as Kochan, et. al, (2002), which says that providing an
equal job opportunity to women is vital to improve performance of employees in an organization.
All divisions of the company must meet annual targets for the representation of majority and
minority males and females in each employee grade level. Kochan, et. al, (2002).
                                               64
Ethnically diverse teams working in relatively homogeneous organizations experienced
performance deficits relative to the more homogeneous teams. Joshi and Jackson. (2003).
Furthermore, the performance deficit was not evident for ethnically diverse teams working in
ethnically diverse organizations. Given the nature of the tasks performed by these teams, this
finding is consistent with our predictions. In ethnically homogeneous organizations, the ethnic
differences among members of diverse teams become more salient and are more likely to
interfere with performance. In ethnically heterogeneous organizations, however, the ethnic
identities of team members may be less salient and therefore they create less disruption. Joshi
and Jackson. (2003).
                                              65
5.3 Recommendations for Future Study
This study could serve as a guideline for future researches at the ADCSI. The focus of this research
was on workforce diversity. The results indicated employee performance is significantly affected
when the diversity variables of ethnicity and gender are considered at the ADCSI. Diversity is a
well-accepted phenomenon at the ADCSI. It is important for the financial institution therefore to
realize the need to capitalize on these demographic categories in order to stay ahead of other
financial institutions or organizations. Smith (2010) argued that good workforce diversity
practices are believed to enhance employee and organizational performance. However, at the
ADCSI there seems to be no link between workforce diversity and performance. To fully
understand the scenario at the ADCSI, further studies need to be conducted in order to unearth
the challenges of employee work performance, with a view to discovering what needs to be done
to enable the institution increase efficiency and make better its service delivery to the people.
5.4 Conclusion
The objectives of this study have been fulfilled with positive results for all the tested variables.
From the findings, workforce diversity has significant effect towards employee work performance
at the ADCSI. There is no discrimination on the basis of ethnicity, gender and educational
background. Normally discrimination either directly or indirectly curtails the potential of
available talents or underutilizes the employees. The ADCSI has a diverse workforce with a
satisfying work environment which is highly socialized. It became clear from the study that low
or higher employee work performance is influenced by workforce diversity such as gender and
ethnicity at the ADCSI.
Several researches suggest that whether or not diversity has positive or negative effect, depends
on different aspects of the organization`s strategies, culture and HRM practices. This indicates
that diversity may be beneficial under certain conditions and may fail to have any impact in
others, Pugh (2008). The following factors are known to affect the effectiveness of workforce
diversity: size of organization, age of organization, type of organization and diversity of
community surrounding an organization.
                                                66
                                        References
Abbas, Qasar & Hameed, Abdul (2010). Gender Discrimination and Its Effect on Employee
       Performance or Productivity. Paper presented at the Conference of the Euromed
       Academy of Business, University of Nicosia, Cyprus.
Adler, N. J. (2005). Cultural Synergy: Managing the Impact of Cultural Diversity. London:
       Sage Publications.
Algahtani, A. (2013). "Diversity in the Corporate Setting." International Journal of Business
       and Social Science 4(14).
Amaram, D. I. (2007). Cultural diversity: Implications for workplace management. Journal
       of Diversity Management,2(4), 1-6.
Amason, A. C. (1996). Distinguishing the effects of functional and Dysfunctional Conflict on
       Strategic Decision Making: Resolving a Paradox for top Management teams. Academy
       of management Journal, 39,123-148.
Armstrong, M. (2003). A Handbook of Human Resource Management Practice. 9th Edition.
       London: Cambrian Printers Ltd.
Barrington, L. & Troske, K. (2001). Workforce Diversity and Productivity: An Analysis of
       Employer-EmployeeMatchedDataRetrievedDec1,2012from
       http://gatton.uky.edu/faculty/troske/working_pap/barrington_troske.pdf.
Benschop, Y. (2001). Pride, prejudice and performance: Relations between HRM, diversity
       and performance. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 12, 1166-
       1181.
Bezrukova, K. (2004). A field study of group diversity, group context, and performance.
       Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25 (6), 703-729.
Brown, S. L. (2008). Diversity in the Workplace: A Study of Gender, Race, Age, and Salary
       Level. UMI Number: 3297416 by ProQuest Information and Learning Company.
Brown, U.J., Knouse, S. B., Stewart, J.B. & Beale, R.L. (2009). “The relationship between unit
       diversity and perceptions of organizational performance in the military”. Journal of
       Applied Statistics, 36 (1), 111-120.
Brooks, F. (2007). Racial diversity on acorn’s organizing staff 1970-2000. Administration in
       Social Work, 31(1), 27-48.
                                              67
Carrel, M. R (2006). Defining Workforce Diversity Programs and Practices in Organizations:
       A Longitudinal Study. Labor Law Journal. Spring, 2006.
Cascio, W. F. (2000). Costing human resources: The financial impact of behavior in
       organizations (4th ed.). Cincinnati,OH: South-Western.
Childs, J. (2005). Managing Workforce Diversity at IBM. A Global Human Resource Topic
        that has Arrived. Human Resource Management 44 (1), 73-77.
Cilliers, F. (2007). A systems psychodynamic exploration of diversity management: the
       experiences of the client and the consultant. South African Journal of Labour
       Relations, 31(2), 32- 50
Cho, S & Mor Barak, M.E. (2008). Understanding of diversity and inclusion in a perceived
       homogeneous culture: A study of organization commitment and job performance
       among Korean employees. Administration in social work, Vol. 32 (4): 100-126.
Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (2000). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning
       and innovation.,. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 128-152. Cornelius, N. (1999).
       HRM A Managerial Perspective. London: International Thomson.
Cox, T. H., Lobel, S. A., & McLeod, P. L. (1991). Effects of ethnic group cultural differences on
       cooperative and competitive behaviour on a group task. Academy of management
       journal, 34(4), 827-847.
Cox, T. (1994). Cultural diversity in organizations: Theory, research and practice. California
       Berrett-Koehler Publisher
Cox, T. & Blake, S. (1991). Managing cultural diversity: Implications for organizational
       competitiveness. The Executive, 5 (3), 45-55.
Cornelius, N. (1999). HRM A Managerial Perspective. London: International Thomson
Childs, J., et al. (2005). "Workforce diversity: A global HR topic that has arrived." The future
       of human resource management 64: 110-118.
Cilliers, F. (2007). A systems psychodynamic exploration of diversity management: the
       experiences of the client and the consultant. South African Journal of Labor
       Relations, 31(2), 32- 50
Cunningham, G. B. (2008). "Creating and sustaining gender diversity in sport
       organizations." Sex Roles 58(1-2): 136-145.
Dahlin, K., Weingart, L. & Hinds, P. (2005). Team diversity and information use. The
                                               68
       Academy of Management Journal 48 (6), 1107–1123.
Dahm, Molly, J. (2003). The Development of a Needs Analysis Instrument for Cultural
       Diversity Training: WDQ-II. UMI Microform 3081485 by ProQuest Information and
       Learning Company.
Daniel C.H. (2009). The effects of higher education policy on the location decision of
       individuals: Evidence from Florida's Bright Futures Scholarship Program. Regional
       Science and Urban Economics, 39, 553-562.
De Dreu, C. K. W., and Van de Vliert, E. (Eds) (1997). Using Conflict in Organizations, Sage,
       London.
Dombai, C. & Verwey, S. (1999). The impact of organizational culture as a context of
       interpersonal meaning on the management of organizational diversity. Journal of
       Communicate, 18 (2), 104-130.
Dee, T.S. (2004). Are there civic returns to education? Journal of Public Economics, 88(9–
       10), 1697–1720
De Armond, S., Tye, M., Chen, P. Y., Krauss, A., Rogers, D. & Sintek, E. (2006). Age and gender
        stereotypes: New challenges in a changing workplace and workforce. Journal of
       Applied Social Psychology, 36 (9), 2184-2214.
Dreachslin, J.L. (1996). Diversity Leadership. Health Administration Press, Chicago.
Eduard, B. (2010). Overcoming an Inferiority Complex- People Skills Decoded. Retrieved,
       www.peopleskillsdecoded.com/inferiority-complex.
Erasmus, L. (2007). The Management of Workforce Diversity and the Implications for
       Leadership at Financial Asset Services. Business Management, University of
       Johannesburg.
Eugene, C., Lee, K., Tan. S., Tee, S. & Yang, P. (2011). Effects of Workforce Diversity on
       Employee Performance. ROI, eprints.utar.edu.my/450/1/BA-2011-0807009.pdf.
Friedman, R. A., Tidd, S. T., Currall, S. C., Tsai, J.C. (2000). What goes around comes around:
       the impact of personal conflict styles on work conflict and stress. International
       Journal of Conflict Management, 11, 32-55.
Frink, D. D., et al. (2003). "Gender Demography and Organization Performance A Two-
                                               69
       Study Investigation With Convergence." Group & Organization Management 28(1):
       127-147.
Gallego-Álvarez, I., García-Sánchez, I. M. & Rodríguez-Dominguez, L. (2010). The influence
        of gender diversity on corporate performance. Revista de Contabilidad-Spanish
       Accounting Review, 13 (1), 53-88.
Gelner, C. & Stephen, V. (2009). The Impact of Aging and Age Diversity on Company
       Performance. Academy of Management Executive. 14 (1), 93–105.
Hasan, A., Muhammad, A. K., Imran A. (2009). Linkage between Employee‟s Performance
        and Relationship Conflict in Banking Scenario. International Journal of Business
       Management,.4(7).
Herdman, A. O. & McMillan-Capehart, A. (2010). Establishing a diversity program is not
       enough: Exploring the determinants of diversity climate. Journal of Business
       Psychology, 25 (1), 39–53.
Herring, C. (2005). Does Diversity Pay? Racial Composition of Firms and the Business Case
       for Diversity.
       RetrievedMay20,2011from
       http://www.genderprinciples.org/resource_files/Does_Diversity_Pay_Raci
       al_Composition_of_Firms_and_The_Business_Case_for_Diversity.pdf.
Horwitz, S. (2005). The Compositional Impact of Team Diversity on Performance:
       TheoreticalConsiderations.http://www.researchgate.net/journal/1552
       6712_Human_Resource_Development_Review.
Hostager, T. J., & De Meuse, K. P. (2002). Assessing the complexity of diversity perceptions:
       breadth, depth, and balance. Journal of Business and Psychology, 17(2), 189-206.
Inmyxai, S. & Takahashi Y. (2010). Performance Comparison Derived from Human
       Resources between Male and Female Headed Firms in the Lao MSMEs. International
       Review of Business Research Papers, 6(2), 12-38.
Jayne, M. E. A. &Dipboye, R. L. (2004). Leveraging Diversity to Improve Business
       Performance Research Findings and Recommendations for Organizations. Human
       Resource Management, Winter 2004, 43(4), 409–424.
Jackson, S. E. & Joshi, A. (2004). Diversity in social context: A multilevel analysis of team
       diversity and sales performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, 675-702.
                                               70
Janse Van Rensburg, K. & Roodt, G. (2005). The perceptions of employment equity and
       black Economic empowerment as predictors of union commitment. South African
       Journal of Industrial Psychology, 31 (1), 55-64
Janse van Rensburg, K. & Roodt, G. (2005). The perceptions of Employment Equity and
        black economic empowerment as predictors of organization-related commitment.
       South African Journal of Human Resource Management, 3 (3), 49-60.
Janssens, M., Sels, L., & van den Brande, I. (2003). Multiple Types of Psychological Contracts.
       A Six Cluster Solution’, Human Relations, 56, 1349–1378.
Joshi, A., & E. Jackson, S. (2003). Managing workforce diversity to enhance cooperation in
        organization. International Handbook of Organizational Teamwork and Cooperative
       Working.
Jehn, K. A., & Bezrukova, K. (2004). A field study of group diversity: Workgroup context and
       performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(6), 703- 729.
Joshi, A., & E. Jackson, S. (2003). Managing workforce diversity to enhance cooperation in
       organization. International Handbook of Organizational Teamwork and Cooperative
       Working.
Kamps, J. & Engelbrecht, A. (2011). The influence of emotional intelligence on diversity
       complexity cognition and the attitude towards diversity. South African Journal of
       Business Management, 42 (3), 37-48.
Kernahan, C. & Davis, T. (2007). Changing perspective: how learning about racism
       influencing student awareness and emotion, Journal of Teaching Psychology, 34(1),
       49-52
Kirby, S.L. & Richards, O. C. (2000). Impact of marketing workplace diversity on employee
       job involvement and organizational commitment. Journal of Social Psychology, 140
       (3), 367-377.
Kiglai. (2006). Training Manual on Conflict Management, The National Unity and
       Reconciliation Commission, Republic of Rumanda.
Knight, D., Pearce, C. L., Smith, K. G., Olian, J. D., Sims, H. P., & Smith, K.A. (2009). Top
       management team diversity, group process, and strategic consensus. l, 20, Strategic
       Management Journal,1 (20), 445-465.
Kochan, T., Bezrukova, K., & Ely, R. (2002). Society for Human Resource Management. The
                                                 71
        Effects of Diversity on Business Performance, 15-30.
Kochan, T., Bezrukova, K., Ely, R., Jackson, S., Joshi, A., Jehn, K., Leonard, J., Levine, & Thomas
        (2003). The Effects of Diversity on Business Performance: Report of the Diversity
       Research Network. Human Resource Management, Spring 2003, 42(1), 3-21.
Kossek, E., Lobel, S. A. & Brown, J. (2005). Human Resource Strategies to Manage Workforce
       Diversity Examining „The Business Case‟. Retrieved Dec 3, 2012 from
       http://www.sagepub.com/upm-data/7425_03_Konrad_02.pdf
Kossek, E.E., Lobel, S.A., and Brown, A.J. (2005), ‘Human Resource Strategies to Manage
       Workforce Diversity,’ in Handbook of Workplace Diversity, eds. A.M. Konrad, P.
       Prasad and J.M. Pringle, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 54–74.
Kulik, C. T. and L. Roberson (2008). "Common goals and golden opportunities: Evaluations
       of diversity education in academic and organizational settings." Academy of
       Management Learning & Education 7(3): 309-331.
Kundu, S. C. (2003). Workforce Diversity Status: A Study of Employees‟ Reactions,
       Industrial Management & Data Systems, 103 (4), 215 – 226.
Kunze, F., Boehm, S., & Bruch H. (2009). Age Diversity, Age Discrimination, and
        Performance Consequences – A Cross Organizational Study
Latham, G, P, & Locke, E, A. (2006). Enhancing the Benefits and Overcoming the Pitfalls of
       Goal Setting. Organizational Dynamics,35, 332-340.
Lee, Y. (2011). Report: Firm must do more to retain keep women staff [Electronic version].
       TheStarRetrievedMay29,2011,fromhttp://www.thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?se
       c=nation&file=/2011/3/8/nation/8210968Leonard, J. S., Levine (2003). Diversity,
       Discrimination and Performance. (p40). California:
       Institute for Research on Labor and Employment, UC Berkeley.
Mack, R. W. (1965). The Components of Social Conflict. Social Problems, 22(4), 388-397.
Madiha, A., Niazi, M., & Abbasi, R. (2003). Workforce diversity. ROI,
       www.slideshare.net/leomaryslideshare/workforce-diversityppt-2003.
Makokolo, M. (2005). A report on Minority indigenous peoples and ethnic diversity in Kenya.
       London: Minority Rights Group International.
McMillan-Capehart, A. (2006). "Heterogeneity or Homogeneity." Performance
       Improvement Quarterly 19(1): 83-98.
                                                72
McMillan-Capehart, A. (2003). Cultural diversity's impact on firm performance: The
       moderating influence of diversity initiatives and socialization tactics. Unpublished
       doctoral dissertation, Louisiana Tech University, USA.
McGrath, J.E., Berdahl, J.L., Arrow, H. (1995). Traits, Expectations, Culture and Clout: The
       Dynamics of Diversity in Workgroups. Washington D.C, : American Psychological
       Association.
Mfene, P. N. (2010). Enhancing supervisor and subordinate communication in diversity
       management. Africa Insight, 40(2), 141-152.
Michele. E. A., Jayne, Dipboye. R. L. (2004). Leveraging Diversity to Improve Business
       Performance: Research Findings and Recommendations for Organizations. Wiley
       InterScience, 43(4).
Moskos, C. C. (1996). Black leadership and racial integration the Army way. New York: Basic
       Book
Nkomo, S. (1995). Identities and the Complexity of Diversity in Work Teams. Washington DC:
       American Psychological Association. Opstal, E. (2009). Management Diversity. The
       relationship between the Management of ethnic cultural, 25-46.
Ostergaard, C. R., et al. (2011). "Does a different view create something new? The effect of
       employee diversity on innovation." Research Policy 40(3): 500-509.
Passos M. A. & Caetano A. (2005). Exploring the effects of intragroup conflict and past
       performance feedback on team effectiveness. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 20
       (3/4), 231-244.
Pitts, D. W., Hicklin, A. K., Hawes, D. P., & Melton, E. (2010). What Drives the
       Implementation of Diversity Management Programs? Evidence from Public
       Organizations. Journal of Public Administration Research & Theory, 20(4), 867-886.
Roberson, L. & Kulik, C.T. (2007). Stereotype threat at work. Academy of Management
       Perspectives, 21, 24-40.
Robbins, S.T. & Judge, T.A. (2007). Organizational behaviour. 12th ed. New Jersey: Prentice
       Hall.
Rue, L.W., & Byars, L.L. (1993). Supervision: Key Link to Productivity, (4th Ed). Chicago:
       Irwin.
                                               73
Sipe, S., Johnson, C.D. & Fisher, D.K. (2009). University Students’ Perceptions of Gender
       Discrimination in the Workplace: Reality Versus Fiction. Journal of Education for
       Business, 28, 339-349.
Schuler, R. (1992). Strategic Human Resource Management Linking the People with the
       Strategic Needs of the Business. Organizational Dynamics, Summer, 18-31.
Simons, T. L., Peterson, R. S. (2000). Task conflict and relationship conflict in top
       management teams: the pivotal role of intragroup trust. Journal of Applied Psychology,
       Vol. 85, pp.102-11.
Srivastava, E. & Agarwal, N. (2012). The Emerging Challenges in HRM. International Journal
       of Scientific & Technology Research, 1(6), 46-48.
Smith, P. (2010). Increasing Productivity: Workforce Training and Development. The
       Bleaner.
Stockdale, M. S. & Crosby, F.J. (2004). The Psychology and Management of Workplace
       Diversity. Journal of Sport Management, 19 (1), 523-525.
Sungjoo, L. (2010). Open innovation in SMEs—An intermediated network model. ROI,
       http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048733309002248
Syed, J. (2009) contextualizing diversity management in M. Ozbiligin (Ed.) Equality,
       Diversity and inclusion at work: A research Companion, PP.101-111. Cheltenham &
       New York: Edward Elgar.
Timmermans, B., Ostergaard, C. R., &Kristinsson, K. (2011). Does a different view create
       something new? The effect of employee diversity on innovation. Research Policy,
       500-509.
Tracy R. L. & David E. M. (2011). Choosing workers' qualifications: No experience
        necessary? International Economic Review,34(3), 479-502.
Uys, I. (2003). Diversity management: reasons and challenges. Politeia, 22 (3), 30-48.
Van Knippenberg, D., De Dreu, C. K. W., & Homan, A. C. (2004). Work group diversity and
       group performance: An integrative model and research agenda. Journal of Applied
       Psychology, 89, 1008-1022.
Van Esbroek, W., & van Engen. M.L. van (2008). Management van Diversiteiten
       Rechtvaardigheid: Op zoeknaar een „Beste benadering‟. Tijdschrift voor HRM, 63-90.
Williams, K.Y (1992). Demography and Diversity in Organizations.
                                               74
Van Zyl, B & Roodt, G. (2003). Female perceptions on employment equity: is the glass
       ceiling cracking? South African Journal of Human Resource Management 1(2), 13-
       20.
Zeng, H., Zhou, X. and Han, J. L. (2009). Employee engagement and personal performance in
       hotel service industry of China.
Zgourides, G. D., Johnson, L., & Watson, W. E. (2002). The influence of ethnic diversity on
       leadership, group process, and performance: an examination of learning teams, 2-8.
                                              75
                                         APPENDICES
Date: ___________________________
MBA STUDENT
ID NO: MBA/2238/2008
To Respondent,
Dear Sir/Madam
You have been selected to participate in this study as a respondent. The information you provide
shall be treated entirely for academic purposes and shall be held with high confidentiality.
Yours sincerely,
Saron Eshetu
                                                76
                                      APPENDICES
APPENDIX B: QUESTIONNAIRE
This questionnaire consists of five sections. The respondent will be required to answer six
questions in section one of the questionnaire on his/her background. All the items in sections B-E
require responses ranging from strongly agree to strongly disagree. The respondent is expected to
tick (√ ) whichever is appropriate with his or her opinion.
1.Gender
Male ( )
Female ( )
18-30 years ( )
31- 40 years ( )
41- 50 years ( )
51- 60 years ( )
0- 5 years ( )
6 - 10 years ( )
11- 15 years ( )
Over 15 years ( )
                                                77
 Oromo                        SNNPR                  Harere
 Amara                        Somali                 Other
 Tigray                       Afar
Diploma 10+3 ( )
1st Degree ( )
6. Branch
Head office ( )
Kirkose District ( )
SECTION B
                                              78
 3 The ethnic diversity in our team promoted
    free flow of information between ethnic
    groups
 4 Different languages used to communicate
    create problems among employee.
 5 The ethnic diversity in our team helped to
    expedite the completion of our task on time
 6 The ethnic differences in work groups do not
    encourage conflict.
 7 I am positive about ethnic diversity at the
    ADCSI
SECTION C
Attribute on Gender
                                                 79
 5 Gender diverse team showed better problem
    solving and decision making skills than
    gender homogenies teams.
 6 A career development that includes women
    is encouraged at the ADCSI
 7 Training and development program is
    structured to meet the criteria/ requirement
    of male and female gender.
 8 Gender diverse teams achieved target due to
    the good relationship and effective
    communication
 9 I am positive about gender diversity at the
    ADCSI
SECTION D
                                                 80
 4 At the ADCSI differences in educational
     background do not bring conflict among
     employee
 5 As an employee of ADCSI, l experience lack
     of confidence due to my educational
     background.
 6 ADCSI gives equal treatment when it comes
     to educational background.
SECTION E
                                                81
7   At the ADCSI employees are given a
    chance to apply their own methods of doing
    their work.
8   Training given by the company encourage
    me to work better
9   At ADCSI employees with higher
    educational qualifications perform better
    than those with lower qualification.
10 Good employee work performance is
    important for the future growth of the
    ADCSI
82