0% found this document useful (0 votes)
301 views7 pages

Atty. Alden Francis C. Gonzales

The document outlines Philippine obligations and contracts law, citing numerous cases related to specific articles. It discusses key concepts like sources of obligations, contracts as the law between parties, default and demand, fortuitous events, interest imposition, conditions of obligations, forms of payment, compensation, novation, consent and stages of contracts. The document provides an extensive list of case citations corresponding to various legal articles governing obligations and contracts under Philippine law.

Uploaded by

Justin Tayaban
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
301 views7 pages

Atty. Alden Francis C. Gonzales

The document outlines Philippine obligations and contracts law, citing numerous cases related to specific articles. It discusses key concepts like sources of obligations, contracts as the law between parties, default and demand, fortuitous events, interest imposition, conditions of obligations, forms of payment, compensation, novation, consent and stages of contracts. The document provides an extensive list of case citations corresponding to various legal articles governing obligations and contracts under Philippine law.

Uploaded by

Justin Tayaban
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 7

OUTLINE AND CASES

OBLIGATIONS & CONTRACTS

(ATTY. ALDEN FRANCIS


C. GONZALES)
Article 1156 & 1157; Obligations defined; Sources

Makati Stock Exchange vs. Campos


G.R. No. 138814, 16 April 2009

Article 1158; Obligations derived from law are not presumed

 Pelayo vs. Lauron


12 Phil. 453

 De la Cruz vs. Northern Theatrical Ent.


95 Phil. 739

Article 1159; Contract is the law between the parties

 NGEI Multi-Purpose Cooperative Inc. vs. Filipinas Palmoil Plantation Inc.


684 SCRA 152

 MBTC vs. Rosales


713 SCRA 75

Article 1169, Default; Demand

 General Milling Corporation vs. Ramos


654 SCRA 256

 Santos Ventura Hocorma Foundation vs. Santos


441 SCRA 472

 Solar Harvest, Inc. vs. Davao Corrugated Carton Corporation


625 SCRA 448

 SSS vs. Moonwalk Development & Housing Corp.


221 SCRA 119

 Cruz vs. Gruspe


693 SCRA 415

 Rivera vs. Spouses Chua


746 SCRA 1

 Lorenzo Shipping Corp. vs. BJ Marthel Int’l.


443 SCRA 163

Article 1170; Malicious delay; Contravention of tenor

 Telefast Communications/Phil. Wireless, Inc. vs. Castro, Sr.


158 SCRA 445
2

 RCBC vs. Court of Appeals


305 SCRA 449

Article 1174; Fortuitous event

 Juntilla vs. Fontanar


136 SCRA 624

 NPC v. Court of Appeals


222 SCRA 415

 Mindex Resources vs. Morillo


379 SCRA 150

 Metro Concast Steel Corporation vs. Allied Bank


711 SCRA 479

Article 1175; Interests to be imposed on obligations

 Sunlife of Canada vs. Tan Kit


738 SCRA 371

 Macalinao vs. BPI


600 SCRA 67

 Spouses Solangon vs. Salazar


360 SCRA 379

 Commonwealth Insurance Corp. vs. Court of Appeals


421 SCRA 367

 Federal Builders vs. Foundation Specialist


734 SCRA 739

Article 1180; Fixing of term

 Tiglao vs. Manila Railroad


98 Phil. 181

Article 1181; Suspensive and resolutory condition

 Javier vs. Court of Appeals


183 SCRA 171

 Heirs of Paulino Atienza vs. Espidol


628 SCRA 256

 Central Phil. University vs. Court of Appeals


246 SCRA 511

 Parks vs. Province of Tarlac


49 Phil. 142
3

Article 1182; Potestative, casual and mixed conditions

 Vda. De Mistica vs. Naguiat


418 SCRA 73

 Trillana vs. Quezon College, Inc.


93 Phil. 383

 Romero vs. Court of Appeals


250 SCRA 223

 Santos vs. Court of Appeals


337 SCRA 67

Article 1189; Suspensive condition; lost of the thing

 Osmena III vs. SSS


533 SCRA 313

Article 1191; Rescission of reciprocal obligations

 Villamar vs. Mangaoil


669 SCRA 426

 Ayson-Simon vs. Adamos


131 SCRA 439

 Maglasang vs. Northwestern University


694 SCRA 128

 Mila A. Reyes vs. Victoria T. Tuparan


650 SCRA 283

 Pagtalunan vs. De la Cruz Vda. de Manzano


533 SCRA 242

 Fabrigas vs. San Francisco del Monte, Inc.


476 SCRA 247

 Communities Cagayan, Inc. vs. Nanol


685 SCRA 453

Article 1192; Both parties guilty of violating the obligation

 Central Bank vs. Court of Appeals


139 SCRA 46

Article 1207; Joint & solidary obligations

 IMIDC vs. National Labor Relations Commission


331 SCRA 640
4

 Ernesto Ronquillo vs. Court of Appeals


132 SCRA 274

 Manlar Ricemill vs. Deyto


715 SCRA 81

Article 1217; Recovery in case of payment

 Republic Glass Corp. vs. Qua


435 SCRA 480

Article 1240; To whom payment shall be made

 BPI vs. Court of Appeals


232 SCRA 302

 Culaba vs. Court of Appeals


427 SCRA 721

 Dela Cruz vs. Concepcion


684 SCRA 74

Article 1245; Dation in payment

 Caltex (Phil.), Inc. vs. IAC


215 SCRA 580

 PNB vs. Pineda


197 SCRA 1

Article 1249; Republic Act No. 8183 (June 11, 1996); Form of payment

 Tibajia vs. Court of Appeals


223 SCRA 163

 Papa vs. Valencia & Co., Inc.


284 SCRA 643

Article 1250; Extraordinary inflation and deflation

 Filipino Pipe and Foundry Corp. vs. NAWASA,


161 SCRA 339

Article 1256; Tender of payment and consigation

 Roman Catholic Archbishop of Malolos vs. IAC


191 SCRA 411

 Rayos vs. Reyes


398 SCRA 24

 Dalton vs. FGR Realty and Development Corporation


640 SCRA 92
5

 Spouses Cacayorin vs. AFP-MBAI


696 SCRA 311

Article 1279; Legal Compensation

 International Corp. Bank vs. IAC


163 SCRA 296

 Francia vs. IAC


162 SCRA 753

 Mondragon Personal Sales, Inc. vs. Victoriano S. Sola, Jr.


689 SCRA 18

 Montemayor vs. Millora


654 SCRA 580

Article 1291; Novation

 Iloilo Traders vs. Heirs of Soriano


404 SCRA 67

 Ajax Marketing & Development Corp. vs. Court of Appeals


248 SCRA 222

 California Bus Lines vs. State Investment House


418 SCRA 297

Article 1292; Real or objective novation

 Philippine National Bank vs. Lilian S. Soriano


682 SCRA 243

Article 1293; Subjective novation

 S.C. Megaworld Construction vs. Parada


705 SCRA 584

Article 1305; Stages of a contract

 Robern Development Corporation vs. People’s Landless Association


693 SCRA 24

Article 1308; Mutuality of contracts

 Philippine Savings Bank vs. Castillo


649 SCRA 527

Article 1311; Stipulation in favor of third persons


6

 Mamaril vs. The Boy Scout of the Philippines


688 SCRA 437

 Coquia vs. Fieldmen’s Insurance Co., Inc.


26 SCRA 178

Article 1314; Unlawful Interference

 Gilchrist vs. Cuddy


29 Phil 542

 Yu vs. Unisia Merchandising


217 SCRA 328

Article 1315 ; Consensual contracts ; effects

 C.F. Sharp & Co. Inc. vs. Pioneer Insurance & Surety Corporation
666 SCRA 210

Article 1319 ; Consent and acceptance ; How manifested

 Heirs of Fausto C. Ignacio vs. Home Bankers Savings and Trust Company
689 SCRA 173

 Laudico vs. Arias


43 Phil. 270

Article 1324; Option contract

 Ang Yu Asuncion vs. Court of Appeals


238 SCRA 602

Article 1331; Mistake to invalidate consent

 The Roman Catholic Church vs. Pante


669 SCRA 234

Article 1335; Vitiation of consent; intimidation

 Mangahas vs. Brobio


634 SCRA 351

Articles 1345 & 1346; Simulation of contracts

 Heirs of Dr. Intac v. Court of Appeals


684 SCRA 88

Articles 1356, 1357 & 1358; Form of contracts

 Dauden-Hernaez vs. De los Angeles


7

27 SCRA 1276

Article 1403; Unenforceable contracts; Statute of Frauds

 Orduña vs. Fuentebella


622 SCRA 146

 Hernandez vs. Court of Appeals


160 SCRA 821

 Fernandez vs. Court of Appeals


166 SCRA 577

 Vda. De Espina vs. Abaya


196 SCRA 312

You might also like