Principles of
Darwinite
Fascism
This material was created by
PEF broadcasting.
Section I.
The Philosophy of Social
Darwinism
Social Darwinism is a Socio-Political theory that
originally gained popularity during the late 1800s.
Social Darwinism at its core advocates for natural
law, consequentialism in a way. Theories proposed
by Charles Darwin, especially Natural Selection, (the
idea that only the most fit to survival, the most
intelligent, and the strongest would survive.) Are at
the core of Social Darwinism. This line of thought
seeks to incorporate these theories into political,
economic, social, and corporate fields in the world.
Section II.
he philosophy of Classical
T
Fascism
Fascism, as it’s been classically defined, is a political
line of thought that in simplest terms means the
merging of corporate power and the state. Fascism
is a Third Position based line of thought as it cannot
be grouped into the Capitalistic “Right Wing,” nor
can it be placed in the Communistic class struggle
based “Left Wing.” Rather, it’s a balance, seeking to
progress society past the status quo, and establish a
Corporatist state, with the principles on ending class
conflict, posing an alternative to the traditional
Marxist class war line of thought. “All within the
state, nothing outside the state, nothing against the
state.”
-Benito Mussolini
Section III.
Principles of Darwinite Fascism
Now that we’ve established both what Social
Darwinism and Fascism are, we can begin talking
about the combined principles of the two thoughts
and why they are practical for PEF.
Darwinite Fascism, in basic terms, is what Fascism
is to “Right” and “Left,” an alternative, not one nor
the other. Rather, a perfect fusion of the good ideas
from each system, purging the ideas from each line
of thought that are not relevant to PEF, or to the
modern age.
To begin with, Social Darwinism in its pure state, is
impractical and impossible to implement in modern
age, since it calls for the subjugation or in extreme
cases, extermination of the weak.
It has no views on government or state control over
the subjects of a nation, it doesn’t even have any
views on nation whatsoever. In its purest form,
Social Darwinism would descend into complete
anarchy and chaos, which in turn would make the
nation weak, and any other nation not only would
have the right to, but be justified in invading and
subjugating the nation and its people.
Like mentioned before, Fascism is the best and most
practical way to bridge these gaps. The Fascist
corporatist system is the most practical and most
foolproof way to implement Social Darwinism into
society. Once again, as stated before, neither
ideology is at its best in its purest form, so Darwinite
Fascism bridges these gaps by:
1. Establishing a Corporatist based Authoritarian
state.
(This allows for Social Darwinist policies to be implemented into
society, while keeping society as a whole from plunging into anarchy.)
2. Eliminating the status quo.
( This allows the nation to be dragged out of the weak and
brainwashed mindset of the two party system that’s been pacifying
and weakening the people of a country.)
3. Creating a nation based off of self reliance,
agrarianism, and a united mindset.
(This allows the nation liberated to become independent of foreign
powers, reducing the impact of imperialism, returning troops home
and off of foreign soil. The nation will grow in strength when it is
devoid of interdependence on other powers.)
4. Seeking to create a perfect bridge and balance in
between the doctrines of Social Darwinism and
fascism.
(The bridge is something created over a period of careful thought and
time.)
I. What this should look like is only taking the good elements from
each idea and combining them, thus eliminating the flaws of
each major line of thought.
II. At the end of the day, no idea is perfect at all, Darwinite Fascism
simply seeks to create a workable idea that has as minimal flaws
as possible.
III. For example, taking an important element of Classical Fascism
defined by Mussolini; Class Collaborationism. This element is
almost if not entirely irrelevant to Darwinite Fascism, just as
Class Struggle is. Why? Because it involves one economic class,
being the more privileged, and then having this class help and
build up the lower classes. This is an example of the strong
helping the weak, and in this case completely against the core
principles of Darwinite Fascism. Rather, in Darwinite Fascism,
class is almost a non factor, the economic class has little to do
with how well an individual would survive in a society, on the
contrary it does have some value, as it does represent their
economic intelligence to some extent.
5. Establish a nation state via National Struggle.
(Another element taken from Fascism. National Struggle is a concept
in which people of a nation revolt against the current unjust system
and rise up establishing a new system based off of said principles.)
I. Race is irrelevant in National Struggle, Social Darwinism, and
Darwinite Fascism as a whole.
II. The race of an individual has nothing to do with their strength,
and how well they would do in a society, therefore race and
identity politics are completely not involved with Darwinite
Fascism. In fact, identity politics should in fact be considered the
first and foremost enemy of Darwinite Fascism, as they seek to
give people privileges just because of a skin color, disregarding
Darwinite theories of Natural Selection as a whole.
Section IV.
onclusion and summary
C
Summarized, Darwinite Fascism is a doctrine of
thought that seeks to create a social order that is a
fusion of Fascist and Social Darwinist ideas. It is an
Authoritarian Corporatist state that seeks to create a
highly nationalist and traditionalist society where
only those naturally fit to survive reside in.
-PEF
