0% found this document useful (0 votes)
211 views68 pages

Lecture - 12 - Project Evaluation

Here are the calculations for the case study with a 10% discount rate: (i) Payback period = 3 years (Break-even occurs after net benefits become positive in year 3) (ii) B/C ratio = NPV / Total costs = 3255 / 13500 = 0.24 So at a 10% discount rate, the benefit-cost ratio is 0.24.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
211 views68 pages

Lecture - 12 - Project Evaluation

Here are the calculations for the case study with a 10% discount rate: (i) Payback period = 3 years (Break-even occurs after net benefits become positive in year 3) (ii) B/C ratio = NPV / Total costs = 3255 / 13500 = 0.24 So at a 10% discount rate, the benefit-cost ratio is 0.24.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 68

Construction

CE 401 ProjectPractices
Planning and
and Management
Construction
Management
Project Evaluation
Analysis of Capital Investment
Decision

 The process of investment in land, productive


equipment, buildings, working capitals, raw material
deposits and other assets for future economic gain is
particularly difficult and calls for careful analysis.

 We will discuss the analytical techniques which are


used to support investment decisions.
Construction
CE 401 ProjectPractices
Planningand
andManagement
Construction
Management
Project Evaluation
Analysis of Capital Investment
Decision

 Three elements of investment analysis

 Net investment

 Economic life.

 Operating cash flows


Project Evaluation
Analysis of Capital Investment
Decision

B= Benefit

O
n YEARS

C= Cost
Fundamental reason for investment of capital is “to
obtain sufficient economic returns over a future period to
justify the original outlay; i.e. enough receipts to
justify enough cash spent”.
Project Evaluation

Method of analysis
Definitions

Net Investment Refers to the net outlay

Operating Cash Flow Are the not economic benefits.

The time period over which one can


Economic life
expect to obtain the benefits.
Project Evaluation

Method of analysis
Pay back Is a simple relationship of the annual benefit of
(Time Period) a project to the investment required.
Net Investment
Pay back =
Av. Annual operating cash flow
Simple Return on Investment: - inverse of the payback
Av. Annual Cash Flow
Return on investment =
Net Investment
Average Return on Investment
Av. Operating Cash Flow
Average Return =
Av. Net Investment
Project Evaluation

Method of analysis

 Advance concept (Time Value Concept)

Use of time value of money

 Present Value (PV) concept

Techniques of Compounding and Discounting


Project Evaluation
Compounding Growth
Now 1 Year 2 Years 3 Years

$(1+i) (1+I) $(1+i)2 (1+I)


$1 $(1+i)
Or Or
$ (1+i)2 $ (1+i)3

for i = 10% (i.e. 0.1)

$1 $1.10 $1.21 $1.331


Project Evaluation
Now 1 Year 3 Years
2 Years

$1

$1.10

TIME VALUE OF $1.21


MONEY

S 1.331
Project Evaluation
DISCOUNTING
Now 1 Year 2 Years 3 Years

$1 $1.1

$1 $1.21

$1.21
$1
(1/1.10)
$
0.909
$1
(1/1.21)
$ $1
0.826
$ (1/1.331)
$1
0.751
Project Evaluation
SUM OF AMMOUNTS IN DIFFERENT YEARS
Now 1 Year 2 Years 3 Years

$X $A $B $C

Considering the time value of money –

Is $X = $ (A+B+C)
Or, $X Greater than $ (A+B+C)
Or $X Less than $ (A+B+C)
Project Evaluation

Method of analysis

1. Compound Amount (CA): Given P, Find F

F
CA= (1+i)n P

i= interest rate (Cost of Capital)


Opportunity Cost of Capital (OCC) n YEARS
Project Evaluation

Method of analysis
2. Present Worth (PW)
F

Given F, to find P
P

PW
n YEARS
(discount factor)
Project Evaluation

Method of analysis
3. Sinking Fund (SF)
For series amount Give F, to find A
A A
F
A A A

n YEARS

i.e. How much must be deposited at i% each year for n


years to have accumulated F?
SF
Project Evaluation

Method of analysis

Sinking Fund Provision

Problem:

To replace the pumps in 15 years, will


cost US $ 875,000. How much should be
the annual collection from the farmers?,
given, i=12%
Project Evaluation

Method of analysis
4. Capital Recovery Factory (CRF)
P Given P, to find A,
A
A A A A

n YEARS

CRF A=P x CRF


Project Evaluation

Method of analysis

5. Compound Amount (Series)


Given A, to find F

SCA
Project Evaluation

Method of analysis
6. Present Worth (Series) (SPW)
P Given A, to find P
A A A A A

n YEARS

SPW
P=A x SPW
SPW= Annuity Factor
Project Evaluation

Method of analysis
CBA= Const Benefit Analysis
Measures/Criteria for Investment Decisions
The most commonly used measures of discounted figures are
Net present value (NPV)
Benefit/Cost (B/C) ratio
Internal Rate of Return (IRR)

Present Value Payback(PVP),


Present Value Index (PVI)
First Year Rate of Return (FYRR) etc
Project Evaluation

Method of analysis
Example
Purchasing a piece of equipment a company may have the option of
paying in two different ways. Each way involve payments over a five
year period but the actual payments per year vary in each option as
follows:
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5
Option A 10,000 20,000 30,000 40,000 60,000
Option B 45,000 30,000 20,000 20,000 20,000
If payments are made at the end of each year and the discount (interest)
rate is constant over the five years and is equal to 10% p.a., which payment
option should the company choose?
Project Evaluation

Method of analysis
Problem
Once a cement factory is in full production in 1997, the
sixth year of the project (t6), it will produce cement value
Tk. 1,475,000 annually over the economic life of the plant,
taken to be 15 years.

 What is the Present Worth of the cement production


from 1997 through 2006 (t6-t15) discounted at 12%?

 Find the Present Worth of an annuity Factor.


Project Evaluation

Method of analysis
Solution
1 2 3 4 5 6

0 1997 15
A= 1,475,000 SPW=
PWB= (SPW15- SPW6)*A
DF
Here,
SPW15= 6.811
SPW6 = 3.605
Project Evaluation

Method of analysis
Present Worth of Cement Production
Annual Production = 1,475,000
Annuity Factor= A
Year 1 2 3 4 5 A A A A
t1
1997 20065
T6
t6(3.605)
Spw6
Spw15 t15
(6.811)
Project Evaluation

Method of analysis

PW of Total Cement Production

= PWB

=(Spw15- Spw6)*A

= (6.811-3.605)*1,457,000
Project Evaluation

Method of analysis
CBA (Cost Benefit Analysis)
Computational Exercise

Calculation of –

I. Payback Period,
II.Benefit-Cost Ratio,
III.
Net Present Value(NPV),
IV.Internal Rate of Return (IRR) or Discounted Cash Flow (DCF)
Return,
V. First Year Rate of Return(FYRR)
Project Evaluation

Method of analysis

Problem
Case A : Discount Factor-10%

Case B : Discount Factor 20%

Test: “Sensitivity” Analysis


Project Evaluation
Method of analysis
CASE-A (DISCOUNT FACTOR-10%)
Yr Capital O+M1 Total D.F2 PWC Gross D.F2 PWB Net
cost cost 10% benefit 10% benefit

1 7500 - 7500 .909 6818 - .909 - (6818)


2 6000 - 6000 .826 4956 - .826 - (4956)
3 - 1300 1300 .751 976 6000 .751 5606 3530
4 - 1300 1300 .683 888 6000 .683 4098 3210
5 - 1300 1300 .621 807 6000 .621 3726 2919
6 - 1300 1300 .564 733 6000 .564 3384 2651
7 - 1300 1300 .513 667 66003 .513 3386 2719
Total 13500 6500 - - 15845 - - 19100 3255
Project Evaluation

Method of analysis
1 Operation and maintenance Exercise: Calculate
(O&M) costs
2 Discount Factor (1/ n
(1+i) ) (i) Payback
3 Includes Salvage value of 600 (ii) B/C ratio at 10%

(iii) Net Present Worth at


10% and 20% D.F.
B/C = PWB/PWC
NPV/NPW = Total PWB – (iv) IRR (Internal Rate of
Total PWC Return)
IRR = Discount Rate at which (v) FYRR
NPV=0

CASE-B: (D.F.= 20%)


Project Evaluation

Method of analysis
Results of Worksheet

Solution:
1. Payback (i) at 10% 3.8 yrs.
(ii) at 0% 2.9 yrs.

2. B/C ratio –at 10% 19100


= 1.21
15845
3. Net Present Worth(NPW) or NPV
= Present Worth of Total Benefits - Present Worth of Total Costs
= PWB - PWC =19100-15845=3255
Project Evaluation

Method of analysis
Computation of IRR (Graphical Method)
NPV
Project Evaluation

Method of analysis
4. Internal Rate of Return or Discounted Cash Flow
Return, (at NPV=0)

= Lower discount rate + Difference between discount rates


NPV at lower discount rate
X
difference between NPVs rate
= 10+(20-10) 
3255

 3740
= 10+8.7
= 18.719% NPV at 20% (485)
IRR= 19%
Project Evaluation

Method of analysis
Algebraically,

IRR = Low DR + Difference of DR’s (NPV at Lower


DR/Total Difference between NPVs)
=10%/(20%-10%)*(3255/3740)
=10+ 10 (0.87)
=18.7
=19%
Project Evaluation
Economic Appraisal of
Project
In general Five decision criteria are in use
** Net Present Value (NPV)

** Benefit: Cost Ratio (BCR)

** Internal Rate of Return (IRR)

** Payback period

** First Year Rate of Return (FYRRY)


Project Evaluation
Economic Appraisal of
Project
Discussions
NPV Method is recommended as the best of the
above five techniques for economic analysis.

It is subjected to the least ambiguity, it produces


information which is readily understood.

It is least likely to be affected by assumptions


(definition of costs, benefits and is easiest to
calculate).

IRR can be compared with yields from investments,


and is readily understood by decision markers.
Project Evaluation
Economic Appraisal of Project
Internal Rate of Return (IRR)
Significance

Another way of using discounted case flow for measuring


the worth of a project

 It is the discount rate which just makes the net present


worth of the cash flow equal zero.

This discount rate is termed the internal rate of return

and in a sense, It represents the average earning power


of the money used in the project over the project life:
Project Evaluation

Method of analysis
Internal Rate of Return (IRR)

i.e. at that particular discount rate, the Project just


breaks even-i.e. it will earn back all the capital &
operating costs expended upon it and pay us that
percent (i.e. 12 or 15% etc.) for the use of our money in
the project.

Computation:

Use trial or interpolation method illustrated in the


example.
Project Evaluation

Equipment Replacement
Replacement Studies

One of the problems which individuals and business


encounter frequently is deciding whether existing
equipment or property should be replaced with new and
more modern facilities.

Wear and tear of equipment, coupled with rapid


technological progress which results in new and
improved devices, make this an ever present problem.
Project Evaluation
Equipment Replacement
Reasons for Replacement
Four basic reasons for replacement
1. Physical impairment: Existing equipment is
completely or partially worn out.

2. Inadequacy: do not have sufficient capacity.

3. Obsolescence: caused either by or lessening in demand or


by the availability of more efficient equipment.

4. Rental possibilities: to rent identical or comparable


equipment; thus freeing capital for other and more
profitable use.
Project Evaluation

Equipment Replacement
Project Evaluation

Equipment Replacement
DIESEL Versus GALOLIN cont.

Given the Following assumptions on costs and the working


life of the respective equipment engines, make a decision on
which model to purchase

 if you have alternative investment opportunities that


yield 10% interest compounded annually;

 if you have alternative investment opportunities that


yield 20% interest compounded annually.
Project Evaluation

Equipment Replacement
DIESEL MODEL
Operating life 10 years
Price per Engine 100,000
Ann. operating & maint. costs 10,000

GASOLINE MODEL
Operating life 5 years
Price per Engine 50,000
Ann. operating & maint. costs 15,000
Note: There is no salvage value at the end of operating life for
either model.
Which Model to Buy?
Project Evaluation

Equipment Replacement
DIESEL Vs. GASOLINE –WORKSHEET
DIESEL:
End of Annual Discount Present Discount Present
Year Outlays Factor 10% Worth 10% Factor 20% Worth 20%
1 110000 .909 99,990 .833 91,630
2 10000
3 10000
4 10000
5 10000
6 10000
7 10000
8 10000
9 10000
10 10000
52,350 33,590
Total Present Wroth PW= 152,340 125,230
Project Evaluation

Equipment Replacement
GASOLINE
End of Annual Discount Present Worth Discount Present
Year Outlays Factor 10% 10% Factor 20% Worth 20%
1 65000
2 15000
3 15000
4 15000
5 15000
6 65000
7 15000
8 15000
9 15000
10 15000
Total Present PW= 165,810 121,295
worth
Conclusion: At 10%, Diesel is Preferable
At 20%, Gasoline is Preferable
Project Evaluation

Equipment Replacement
DIESEL Versus GALOLIN
CROSSOVER DISCOUNT RATE:
DISCOUNT Total Present Worth Difference between
RATE Cross over Discount
DIESEL GASOLINE Rate: PWs
10% 152,340 165,810 13,470
20%
Between
125,230
10% and 20% there is 3,935
121,295
a
discount rate which will make us
Total Present Worths of the two models will be equal (point of
indifferent
indifference) at a discount rate of:between two
alternatives.(Present Worth of
 13,470 
 10%  (20%  10costs
%)   will be same) 
 13,470  3,935 
=10%+7·7% = 17·7%18%
Project Evaluation
Equipment Replacement
Graphical Solution
Total Total
PWs PWs
Gasoline
Crossover
165,810 Discount Rate
152,340

Diesel 125,230
121,295
110,000
10% 17.7% 20%
Discount Rate
IRR
(NPV=0)
Project Evaluation

Equipment Replacement

From the Figure, Crossover Discount Rate = 17.7%

Crossover Discount Rate

 Between 10% and 20%, there is a discount rate


which will make rate which will make us
indifferent between two alternatives.
Project Evaluation

Equipment Replacement

Crossover Discount Rate

 The Preference ranking of the alternatives (indicated


by the cost stream with the lowest present worth) may
change between lower and higher discount rates.

 The discount rate at which the preference changes is


know as the crossover discount rate.
Project Evaluation

Equipment Replacement
Crossover Discount Rate (contd)

 This is also called as “equalizing” discount rate, at


which the total Present Worth of two alternatives will
be approximately equal.

 In the replacement example, between 10% and 20%,


there is a discount rate which will make us indifferent
between the two alternatives.
Project Evaluation
Exercise- Comparing Alternatives
Compare the economics of two alternative material handling systems.
The Pertinent data are as follows:
System X Y
First Cost $80,000 $200,000
Economic life 20 years 40 years
Annual cash disbursement $18,000 $6,000
Salvage value at end of life $20,000 $40,000

Assuming a 6% minimum attractive rate of return (MARR), show


which alternative is the best by the:

 Annual Cost (A.C) Method


 Present Value (PV) Cost Method.
 Internal Rate of Return (IRR) Method
Project Evaluation
Project Analysis
What is a Project?
A Project is an activity or which we spend money in
expectation of returns and which logically seems to lend
itself to Planning, Financing and Implementing as a unit.

It is the smallest operational element prepared and


implemented as a separate entity in a National Plan or
Program.

It is a specific activity with a specific starting point and


specific ending point intended to accomplish a specific
objective.
Project Evaluation

Project Analysis

Plans and Projects Plans: National plan to accelerate


economic growth- requires good projects.

Good Project requires: Sound Planning; sound planning


requires considerable information, data.

Project Format: Is the framework for analysis of


information from a broad range of sources.
Project Evaluation
Project Activities

Net Social Surplus: = “Good”s - “Bad”s - Inputs


Project Evaluation

Project Analysis
Tools and Techniques for Project management
 Project Selection:

Cost-benefit analysis
Risk and Sensitivity Analysis

 Project Execution Planning:

Work break - down structure


Project execution plan
Project responsibility matrix &
Project management manual.
Project Evaluation

Project Analysis

 Project Scheduling & Coordinating:

Bar charts
Life cycle curves
Line of balance (LOB)
Network techniques (PERT/CPM)
Project Evaluation

Project Analysis

 Project Monitoring & Progressing


Progress measurement technique
Value engineering

 Project Communication & Clean-up

Control room
Computerized information systems.
Project Evaluation
The Project Cycle
There tends to be a natural sequence in the way projects are
planned and carried out – known as Project Cycle.

Identification- To find the potential projects (sources are


from technical specialists or social leaders)

Preparation & analysis- First step is to undertake a


feasibility study that will provide enough knowledge to
help to determine whether or not to proceed with more
detailed planning
Project Evaluation
The Project Cycle
(Contd)
Appraisal- After project has been prepared, it is
appropriate for a critical review or an independent
appraisal to be conducted.

Implementation- Implementation becomes the most


critical/important part of project cycle.

Evaluation- The final phase in the project cycle is


evaluation: looks at systematically the elements of success
& failure.
Project Evaluation
The Project Cycle
Project Evaluation

The
Project
Cycle
Project Evaluation

Project Analysis
Some Aspects of Project Preparation & Analysis
Technical aspects:
Concerns the inputs and outputs of real goods and
services
Technical skills and assistance

Institutional Aspects:
Organizational and Managerial aspects.

Social Aspects:
Social implications of proposed investments
i.e. income distribution and others social concerns
Project Evaluation

Project Analysis
Some Aspects of Project Preparation & Analysis
Commercial Aspects:
Arrangements for marketing outputs produced.
Supply of materials and services needed etc.

Financial Aspects:
Financial impacts
Budgets, Sources etc.

Economic Aspects:
Contribution to the development of total economy etc.
(National growth).
Project Evaluation

Project Analysis
Determining Economic values

A Project may be analyzed either from “Financial”


point of view or from “Economic” point of view.
Financial Analysis:
Based on “Market” prices of goods
and services.
Economic Analysis:
Based on “Economic” value(shadow
price - From the view point of entire
economy.
Project Evaluation

Project Analysis
When we change the market price of any good or service
to make it more nearly represent the opportunity cost to
the society, the new value we assign to it becomes its
“Shadow Price” is not the Market Price but is an
estimate of the economic value of the good or service in
question.

Example :- Determining the value of Foreign Exchange.

Feasibility Reports
Examine these aspects for preliminary assessment of
the project.
Project Evaluation

Feasibility Study
Purpose:

The Feasibility study is an in-depth analysis which is


undertaken in order to establish:
 whether the proposed project will solve the problems
which have motivated the identification,
 whether it has the proper scope and the relevant inputs,
 whether it is possible to implement and to sustain in the
future and
 whether alternative solutions should be considered.
Project Evaluation

Feasibility Study
Perspectives:

The Feasibility study analyses The feasibility study typically


the proposal form many angles, requires a multi-professional
such as: team as it address a wide-
ranging complex of different
• Technical, and often interlinked issues.
• Economic, The study is normally
• Financial, undertaken by external
• Social, consultants.
• Institutional,
• Organizational and
• Environmental.
Project Evaluation

Feasibility Report
1. Summary of the Project
 General Presentation of Basic data
 Specialization, Goods/Services
 Capacity; total volume
 Profitability

2. Market Study
 Market problem in relation to specific project (nature of
markets)
 Specifications of goods/services
 Type of consumers
 Demand forecasting, projection of demand
 Economic policy
Project Evaluation

Project Analysis
3. Size & Location
 Justification of capacity & location
 Minimum cost & freight
 Availability of resources

4. Project Engineering
 Preliminary research
 Technical alternatives, Efficiency
 Flexibility of productive capacity
 Construction, Work schedule/program
Project Evaluation

Feasibility Study
5. Investments

 Cost Items; Composition & Volume of capital


investments
 Cost of organization and equipment
 Investment Program

6. Budget Expenditure & Income Budget

 Annual Cost & Income budgets


 Profits and unit production costs, Selling prices
 Prepare such data (personnel, fuel, materials,
depreciation, intangible benefits)
Project Evaluation

Feasibility Study
7. Evaluation
 Issues/Social view points
 Methodologies for evaluation(Economic vs Financial)
 Criteria of evaluation, Net Return, B/C ratio, IRR, Value
added etc.

8. Financing & Organization


(i) Financing: Sources, dates of availability of funds,
Currency involved.

(ii) Organization: Organizational internal matters; Structure;


Legal; Administrative; Decision making;
Forecasting; Future development.

You might also like